Is this pc good enough for me to use for edit my videos?

Hi
I just need someone to conform me that the pc im getting is good enough to edit my videos with!
Program:Adobe premiere pro cs5 ofcourse
Win 7 64bit ultimate
Intel® Core i7 860 (2,80 Ghz, 8 MB cache)
ASUS P7H55D-M EVO
8 GB DDR3 1333MHz PC3-10666 (2x4GB) Corsair
ATI® Radeon® 5670 1 GB 2xDVI/HDMI + HDTV/HDCP (Asus)
Miditower Antec Sonata III (Quite) With 500 Watt
corsair power supply 400w cx
and I will be using 3 HDD 150Gb 150GB and 1TB
First 150GB HDD will be use for OS,programs and pagefiles
The other 150GB HDD will be used for media and project
And the last 1TB HDD will be used for all my junk file music, export videos,previews and media chache
Is this good enough?
Thanx!

How much whould be recommended?
Their is another one to choose....same brand 650w ,the rest is much expensiver....:-(
Thanx!

Similar Messages

  • Is a mac mini good enough for editing home video?

    I'm considering buying a man mini to do basic video editing. This will be home videos, nothing heavy. Will a mac mini cope with putting an hours and a halfs worth of holiday clips together?

    I would say YES. If you are planning of using iMovie, for example.
    I was doing my family videos on my "old" iMac 2007, with Corde2Duo. I'm sure it's quite enough on the new plateform.
    At least, it's the first price to do it.
    I'm waiting a possible new line of Mac Mini, with latest features to get it.

  • Is this PowerBook Good enough for making music?

    Is this powerbook : PowerBook G4 17Inch
    17-inch TFT widescreen display with 1680x1050 resolution
    1.67GHz PowerPC G4 processor
    2GB memory (DDR2)
    120GB 5400rpm hard drive
    Slot-load 8x SuperDrive (DVD+R DL/DVDRW/CD-RW)
    ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 graphics card with 128MB DDR memory
    The Latest or the last model of Powerbooks
    Is it good enough for making music or editing few video clips?
    Will Snow Leopard run on it?
    Can i upgrade more ram in it ?

    Yes, that Powerbook can be used to make music or edit video clips. When it was new, it was required at the North Carolina School of the Arts for their Film program, using Final Cut software. Having a more powerful Intel CPU would speed up the rendering and processing times, however, the 1.67Ghz Powerbook can certainly handle video editing.
    I know people that have used Garageband on it to make music.
    The last operating system you can run on it is OS X 10.5 Leopard, with the last release being 10.5.8.
    It's RAM is maxed out at 2GB. 
    As long as you don't need newer software that requires an Intel processor and aren't going to rely on that as your system to access streaming video's on the internet, it should work for you.

  • This Computer Good Enough For My Editing Needs?

    I will be getting a new computer for video editing.
    I do gameplay recordings for various games on the PS4.
    My other computer is geared for audio production mixing and mastering.
    This one will be for recording(using game capture device and software) and editing the videos.
    I do not use many effects, mainly some color corrections, and some time remapping using Twixtor, or stock functions.
    I will be using Premiere Pro CS6
    I record using the Elgato Game Capture HD60(H.264 encoding)
    This device connects the PS4 for passthrough your computer, which the software included that controls the device, is installed on the computer, and records the gameplay.
    Specs and info: bottom of the bestbuy page
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/elgato-game-capture-hd-60/7634008.p?id=1219285525278
    Also, the actual website: https://www.elgato.com/en/gaming/game-capture-hd60
    Here is the computer:
    http://www.amazon.com/Dell-X8700-3130BLK-XPS-Desktop/dp/B00K0HMX3A
    I would also get the 4 year protection plan.
    3.6 GHz Intel Core i7-4790 Haswell CPU
    16GB 1600MHz DDR3 RAM
    2TB 7200rpm Hard Drive
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 4GB  GeForce GTX 745 (OEM) | Specifications | GeForce
    Bluetooth 4.0 + 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi
    SuperMulti DVD Burner
    6 x USB 3.0 / 4 x USB 2.0 Ports
    Integrated 7.1 Audio
    Windows 8.1 (64-bit)
    More indepth computer specs:
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1059535-REG/dell_x8700_3130blk_xps_8700_7_i7_4790_16 gb_2tb_windows8_164_black.html
    Also, do these specs/available slots allow for adding a Solid State Drive? Can't find info on available slots..

    Must be based on the fact that the very best AMD based system, a FX8350 octo core, scores only 675 seconds in the benchmark, slower than about 85% of the Intel systems. Other AMD systems are even slower. Most Intel quad cores are much faster and even an average laptop with an Intel quad core CPU is about two times faster than the best AMD system. This AMD system is almost 7 times slower than the fastest single CPU Intel system and other AMD systems are around 10 times slower.
    From the article linked to above:
    As a general rule of thumb, AMD CPU's are not worth considering at all, since they suffer severely from the very limited and badly implemented support of SSE 4.x instructions, which are widely used in PR. That makes these processors very slow, even in the 8-core versions. You get what you pay for, and with AMD that holds very much. Even though Adobe claims AMD processors can be used, that is intended more to make PR look attractive, but it really means you can install the program on an AMD machine, however you can't edit effectively with such a CPU. Even the latest octo-core AMD's are significantly slower than middle-of-the-road Intel quad cores. If you have an AMD processor, do not expect to edit comfortably any codec more demanding than DV. All phone or action camera formats are way beyond what an AMD can handle.
    Does not look like a bias, but a plain statement of easily checked facts.

  • Will specs on an iMac 24in 2.8ghz be good enough for video prod-Mac Newbie?

    Hi guys, I do pretty high end editing in Sony Vegas but wanted to move to Final Cut Pro and Mac workflow. I've been a life time windows user and have been thinking about taking the plunge for about a year now.
    I finally just purchased an iMac 24inch. The related specs are the standard 2.8 ghz, 2 GB ram, and ATI radeon 256 mb. It's still in the box. On my way home I kept wondering about the specs especially since I'm new to Mac. On a windows, those specs might not be that great. Will this be good enough for workflow in FCP. I'm going to upgrade the memory in the near future.
    I was concerned about the graphics card? Will I see slowness or stuttering while editing with a lot of footage, rendering, etc. Thanks so much! I want to take it out of the box so bad!

    It'll be fine for DV and HDV...footage imported from tapeless systems like P2 or XDCAM EX.
    The graphics card doesn't come into play much with editing...only certain filters really use the GFX card...otherwise it is not important.
    It is limiting in that you are only able to use Firewire drives, and since the computer only has one firewire bus, you might run into issues capturing this footage from firewire cameras...the drive and the camera will be using one firewire bus. But I haven't had too many issues with that...daisy chaining works for most of us.
    Shane

  • Integrated graphics (9400M) good enough for keynote?

    I'm thinking about buying a new MBP 15 with only the 9400M card. Will this be good enough for keynote presentations (with some heavy graphics and embedded movies etc) hooked to an external projector?
    (I have an 2006 MBP 15 which is dying (those pixelated horizontal lines) but that had discrete graphics Ati x1600 which had some problems with keynote transitions)
    Thanks!

    It should be able to handle Keynote with no problem.
    But since this particular applications performance seems to
    be very important to you, why not just put a Keynote presentation of yours on
    a CD or flash stick and take it into an Apple Store. They will gladly let you try your
    file with their new Macbook Pro's. If there isn't an Apple Store near you then go to an authorized Apple reseller.
    That is the only way to be totally sure.

  • Is CM RealPower 620 good enough for this ?

    P35 Platinum Combo
    E8500
    N9800GT 1Gb (MSI)
    2x2Gb ddr2-800
    1x sata2 hdd
    1x sata dvdrw
    2x case fan
    Is CoolerMaster 'Real Power 620W' PSU good enough for this setup ?
    (Doesn't have PSU's specification at the moment)
    Thanks

    Cas, you have the coolermaster extreme power. There has been an issue with some models of coolermaster Realpower PSUs.  I could re-state the reasons, but Bosskiller has addressed this several times. 
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=120494.msg910400#msg910400
    Quote from: Bosskiller
    Quote from: mine0000 on 06-October-08, 02:09:39
    The Cooler Master has been working just fine for more than a year with a ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus and an Intel Q6600. The Antec P450 works fine there too. So why should I believe you (no disrespect intended)? What is the specific grounding issue with the Cooler Master? Can you give me a URL to the issue at their support site?
    Thanks.
    Yep:
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=118911.msg897491#msg897491
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=114534.msg858727#msg858727
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113573.msg850339#msg850339
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113170.msg846719#msg846719
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=113573.0
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=115623.0
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=115623.msg869135#msg869135
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=118959.msg897790#msg897790
    http://forum.coolermaster.com/viewtopic.php?p=79607
    Quote from: Ven on 07-August-08, 03:23:06
    Wow are you serious..? Man that sucks...I hope I can get a return on it, damn.
    EDIT: I spoke with there customer support line, they said they could RMA the power supply with a new revision that works with the board, I don't know what I'm going to do though.
    Regardless if you get an updated model which has addressed the compatibility issue, you are better off with a single +12V rail PSU like the ones I suggested.

  • Please make this a good experiance for my first post on any board.  READ ME

    Hi all. Well first off, let me start by saying that my whole life I've owned PC's. And I'm not hacker Elliet. But I've gotten to know them pretty well. All the way from Windows 3.1 that came out a long time ago (more than 10 years ago)
    So after a while of hearing about MAC's I decided to start small and get an iPod (since they are so popular here in NYC) and see what apple was about. Well I really saw that Apple had a great product and started asking about their computers. And did plenty of research. And before the new Intel Macs came out, I was going to get a powerbook. But I had a feeling a new laptop was coming out and waited a lil while and sure enough. The Macbook Pro came out. So I went out and did all my research (as to this being the first real purchase of a Apple product and knew about the possible implications of a new first gen Intel chip in a apple product litterally making history) I knew I might become a new beta tester.
    So I started looking on these boards and did 2 weeks worth of hard research to see if the Mac Book Pro (MBP) was for me. And after all the problems i saw (ex: The whine, Right speaker distortion, heat coming from it, white line at bottom of screen, etc) I never saw or read anything about AOL connectivity problems. And I know, I know... alot of you are probably going to gripe and complain about AOL sucking and yada yada yada, but please. Cut me some slack. I actually like AOL. I got on it back in 92 when it came out, and really enjoyed it. And have been on it since. I like chatting on there, and so forth. And I hope you help with my problem instead of telling me to go get "a real ISP" I do have a real ISP, but I like my AOL too.
    So now to my problem....
    I have a Sony Viao 1.8ghz PC with 512 ram, 80 gig hard drive, 10/100 ethernet port. Connected to a Belkin Router (more info below on specs of router) connected to Opt Online Broadband Cable internet with VoIP. I use my macbook pro on the wireless network at my home.
    I got a mac book pro 1.83 ghz running 512 ram on Tiger OSX 10.4.6 I thought that I would wait till a connectivity patch (which I thought would have been 10.4.6) fix the airport problems came out till I posted something. But now that I've tried everything, I'm hoping you open this thread and help me and possibly someone else out there as well. I just d/l'd and installed the 10.4.6 update last night and it did'nt help. So here's more info on my specs. I have a belkin router wireless G 2.4 ghz 54mbs router and I have configured the router with it's firewall, wap2 encryption (as it's the only selection the router has that is available that matches what airport comes with in encryption) I hid my network, and have tried to upgrade the firmware on the router.
    Now Here's the real problem. I can connect to AOL on my MBP when I connect the actual ethernet cable to the MBP's Ethernet port (after I have let the cable modem do a hard reset to configure itself to a mac) I can connect to AOL. But when I disconnect the cable and return it to it's normal config, I can't connect to AOL. I can connect to the internet via safari, and firefox, and even AOL's IM on iChat. I can use Itunes all kinds of things. I can even play warcraft 3 wirelessly on battlenet. But connecting to AOL is a pain in the @$$. It's the only proggy I have that won't allow it to connect. I keep getting the error message "Your AOL connection ended because the AOL host was unable to start a new session. Please try to sign on again." Of course All i see for a while is the spinning black and white circle. And it goes through step 1 and 2, goes straight to 6. Then it goes blank, and BAM! That message pops up. And what's so frustrating is that I've tried every possible configuration on AOL, my router and even system preferences, for it to let connect. I even went into system preferences on the mac and went down the the Internet & Network "Sharing" icon and tried 100 possible combinations on that in the services tab, and firewall tab. I've turned them on, off, tried to make exceptions ETC. And no matter how much I play with the personal file sharing and windows sharing advanced settings and sigh every possible combination to make AOL connect via wirelessly. And nothing. I then even tried to fix the connection under AOL in setup. I've gone through and selected TCP Script, Airport Script. Cable Script, And practically every script I can think of. And nothing. I even went on to AOL and downloaded thier alleged fix to wireless accessing AOL. And nothing. I've been searching all over google, AOL's website, and all over these discussion boards and no mention of anyone even having the same problem. But please, someone out there with their infinit knowledge of how Macs run and having more experience than me, Please make this a good experiance for my first post on any board anywhere reguarding a mac. A MBP at that too.
    An update to this, But amazingly enough, I actually got it to connect to AOL wirelessly for the first time yest. But I have no Idea how i did it. I tried for 3 hours to reproduce it and no luck. I was accessing my router at it's website config screen and somehow I clicked on connect to AOL and while it was trying to connect to it, i reset the router and BAM, it connected to AOL. And I was in shock. I thought I solved it. Somewhere while it was reseting the router it connected and stayed connected to AOL till I signed off and tried to sign back on to see if I could now connect, and guess what. The same dumb message keeps popping up "Your AOL connection ended because the AOL host was unable to start a new session. Please try to sign on again." And all I did was sign off to test it, thinking I had fixed the problem. I tried for 3 hours like I stated above, and BAM got it connected to AOL wirelessly again (somehow while the router was resetting). And thinking I fixed it, or figured out the trick to getting it to work, signed off... I kissed aol goodbye again. And have been unable to reproduce the "glitch". SIGH Can someone out there please help me?
    I think I've made this message as detailed as possible, but please, can someone give me some constructive criticism on how to fix my AOL wireless connectivity problems. Do you know if it's my router? My MBP? AOL software? BTW, I got AOL software version 10.3.7 (Rev 4136.310 US) The latest version I D/L'ed from the AOL website. Anyone know If I should turn on or off some things such as personal fire sharing on, or firewall off or on? ANYTHING. Please. I've put alot of time into writing this post and making it as detailed as possible. And been having this problem for the past 3 weeks that I've had my MBP, and have waited long enough to use my AOL. If you need any further information or suggestions on making AOL work, please let me know. Thank you for taking the time to read all of this, and I really appreciate all of you in the time you take in responding back in trying to help me. I'll be monitoring this post almost hourly. So I hope someone out there can help. Thanks so much again. And help me make this transition to Mac a pleasant one knowing that there is a mac community out there willing to help a new mac client. Again, Many thanks
    In Heath and Wealth,
    Bruce
    Mac Book Pro 1.83 GHZ 512 Ram   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    I FIXED IT!
    FYI for the rest of you that might be having the same problem. DON'T USE A BELKIN ROUTER WITH AOL ON A MBP!!!!! It ***** wirelessly. or even hard connected, it won't connect. I went to best buy today, and got a refund on the belkin. I then went to J&R and got a D-Link router. And now it works perfect. I can now chat on AOL yet again, and I tried all the other web browsers I have and messengers, and warcraft 3 online via battlenet. And it works great. I want to give you guys a special thanks for taking time out to answer back to my post. FYI! Belkin wireless G routers do not connect you to AOL wirelessly on MBP's. No matter how much you mess around on them. I highly recommend a D-Link Router. They are easy to set up as long as you READ ( AND I MEAN IT!!!) read the instructions before you set anything up on it. Use the CD that it comes with, and you'll be good to go. Set it up and it works great Almost no dead zones in the house, and now I can use the MBP with all it's cababilities. Thanks people. I really appreciate it.
    P.S. I called belkin last night when i decided to get a refund on my router for today and when i talked to the tech, after puersuading him to tell me the truth. And stop BS'ing me, he broke down and admited that AOL does not work wirelessly on MBP's. So to make a long story short this time, There you go. And one last note, I'm very happy now with my d-link router. I honestly thought it would suck. Not being a brand name router or anything. But amazingly, it works like a brand name item! Again, many thanks all.
    Bruce

  • Is photoshop good enough for video editing ?.

    Hi.
    Is photoshop good enough for video editing ?.
    Thanks.

    As DSLRs and cameraphones have added the ability to produce short videos, Photoshop has added that feature in for convenience.
    This should clear up the question for you.
    http://www.adorama.com/alc/0013918/article/Editing-Video-in-Photoshop-Ep-114-DSLR-Video-Sk ills-with-Rich-Harrington-Ador…
    Of course  it's not going to put Adobe Premiere or Final Cut Pro out of business.
    Gene

  • Is Pages Good Enough For Professional Printing?

    I'm looking to do an Large Format Brochure (11" x 17") single fold and I've been using Pages for the mock up and layout. I was thinking that I would need someone to recreate the design in Quark, or Pagemaker, but now I'm wondering if I can do it all in Pages.
    The printer that I plan on using is PSPrint (http://www.psprint.com/) and according to their offset printing specs and template, I just have to provide them with a 300dpi PDF. From what I've tested, exporting to PDF with quality set at "Best" I get a 300dpi file.
    I haven't tested my output with photographs yet since we haven't purchased the final images and are using comps, but am I wrong in thinking that Pages is good enough for this project?
    Template: http://www.psprint.com/DOWNLOAD/templates/brochures/brochurehalffold_11x17front.pdf
    Thanks in advance!

    There is no way to save out of Pages to pdf without flattening the transparency.
    Proposition: In any save path, transparency is flattened in saving.
    Test of proposition: Apple Pages '08 and Apple Mac OS X 10.4.11 as platform.
    1. Launch system software and application software.
    2. Insert first composition frame, select Apple Hoefler antiqua at 24 US pt, enter 'Type', leave default colour, leave default opacity.
    3. Insert second composition frame, select Apple Hoefler antiqua at 24 US pt, enter 'Transparency', change default colour to rubrication red, change opacity to 50%.
    4. Select e.g. File > Print > PDF > Save as PDF, name file 'Test', and select folder.
    5. Launch Acrobat Professional 6 (first version with ISO 15930 PDF/X-3 verification), check the PDF version (: 1.4), check at high magnification (: no rasterisation), check that the source character string can be synthesised (: it can).
    As posted previously, if transparency is applied, PDF 1.4 is automatically configured unless the path is ISO 15930 PDF/X-3 that does not support transparency (PDF 1.3 has an opaque imaging model, not a transparency imaging model). This is a simplistic test, but it is nonetheless a test.
    Because Apple Quartz has applied transparency since 2000, and because there the matrix of system versions and application versions is somewhat monstrous, the notion of testing is somewhat notional .
    /hh

  • K7N2G good enough for Quake 4?

    Hello
    Is K7N2G good enough for Quake 4?
    I mean if Q4 should start at all. System requirements include GForce4MX, but the hangs after the splash window. I wonder what could be the reason. I did set the card shared memory to the required 64MB.
    Thank you
    T

    In the minimum requirements it shows:
    Intel®Pentium® 4 2 Ghz or AMD® XP 2000+ processor or higher
    512 MB RAM
    English Version of Microsoft®Windows® 2000/XP
    100% DirectX® 9.0c compatable 64MB 3D Hardware Accelerator video card required
    8X Speed CD-ROM Drive and latest drivers
    2.8GB of uncompressed free hard disk space (plus 400MB for for Windows® swap file)
    100% DirectX® 9.0c compatable 16-bit sound card and latest drivers
    100% Microsoft®Windows® 2000/XP compatible mouse, keyboard, and latest drivers.
    100% DirectX® 9.0c inlcuded
    They also list Vid Cards:
    ATI® Radeon® 9700
    ATI® Radeon® 9800
    ATI® Radeon® X300
    ATI® Radeon® X550
    ATI® Radeon® X600
    ATI® Radeon® X700
    ATI® Radeon® X800
    ATI® Radeon® X850
    all Nvidia® GeForce 3/TI Series
    all Nvidia® GeForce 4/TI Series
    all Nvidia® GeForce FX Series
    all Nvidia® GeForce 6 Series
    all Nvidia® GeForce 7 Series
    If I read this list correctly you need to be a GeForce 4 TI, not an MX.
    Take Care,
    Richard
    P.S. You will need to run it at the lowest settings and there is still a chance you will get a slideshow. A good Vid Card like an X850XT PE and a total of 2Gb of RAM and I am sure you will get good performance at higher settings.

  • I Want to buy the new mackook air (2013) .Will it be good enough for ios app development as i will be installing xcode.Is 1.3hz processor good enough.

    I Want to buy the new mackook air (2013) .Will it be good enough for ios app development as i will be installing xcode.Is 1.3hz processor good enough.

    The MBA is so small and thin many people can't help thinking it is like a Windows netbook - an underpowered toy. It isn't. There's nothing I do on my top end iMac that I can't - and don't - do on my MBA. Of course the iMac has a faster processor, bus speed, and a discrete video card so it is much faster than my MBA. Then again, my computers spend more time waiting for me to do something than I wait for them - and this includes using Photoshop and compiling code.
    If I were writing large programs - something like Word for example - I'd want a very fast processor to speed up the compile/debug/compile cycle. But for iOS development your codebase will be much smaller. Frankly I can't see that much difference between a 13" MBA and a 13" MBP for development purposes. Now a top of the line 15" MBP is a different matter with its much faster CPU and separate video card.

  • Is a Pentium(R) Dual-Core processor good enough for Adobe Premiere Pro?

    is a Pentium(R) Dual-Core processor good enough for Adobe Premiere Pro?  Under system requirements, Adobe listed Intel Core Duo...not sure if this is just as good?

    Hi Brian,
    Good question. Keep in mind that these are minimum system requirements. I have not had a core 2 duo for some time, but I recall that the performance was not that good at that time, and this was CS5.5, or so. If you are going to use this machine, be sure to work at lower playback resolutions until you can afford a more powerful computer.
    Video editors typically have more powerful systems than the minimum system requirements. Check our hardware forum for details: Hardware Forum
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Is (4770 3.5 i7 qouad core 8 mb cach) good enough for premier and after effect?

    Hi guys,
    am buying the new imac 27" with its maximum features: 32 GB, 1 TB ssd, NVidia gtx 780 with 4GB, but I am worried about the cpu (4770 3.5 i7 qouad core 8 mb cach) is it good enough for premier and after effect?

    Thanks John, but I've already read that page. I have just a simple question about the performance of "4 core" and "6core" if anyone had already tried both of them.

  • Is 96 kbps good enough for iTunes Match?

    I have a pretty large music collection (20,000) but in order to save space I converted it all to 96 kbps. My question is whether or not that is good enough for iTunes Match? I've seen some people who haven't had any problems with 96 kbps but Apple says that it has to be above 96 kbps. I just want to know which one it is.
    Thanks

    No. 96 Kbps songs are not supported by iTunes Match.

Maybe you are looking for