Is VIA 4-in-1 required for Win2K?

Are the VIA 4-in-1 drivers required under Windows 2000 SP3?
My motherboard is a KT4 Ultra-SR with BIOS 1.1.
These drivers are known to cause issues with the Radeon 9700 Pro (which I just purchased), and I need to know if I can do without them...

Ok, great. Thanks for the reply!
I plan on re-installing Win2000 over the holidays. It's been through many installations of my previous card (Radeon 64 DDR VIVO), so I figure I'll start fresh, minus the VIA AGP driver.

Similar Messages

WebAS access via Portal: Web Dispatcher required for load balancing ABAP

Hi Folks -
We have EP 6.0 SP18 (Java only, WebAS 6.40, Unix/Solaris). The portal has a CI/SCS and one DI so we have a Web Dispatcher to load balance the portal servers. This works fine (and provides port 80 access).
This portal will provide access to HTTP services from an ABAP WebAS (6.20 with 6.40 kernel, Unix/Solaris). A landscape configuration entry has been added to the portal for this ABAP system. The ABAP system has a CI and multiple app servers, all capable of handling HTTP requests. This will also require port 80 access.
1. Will we need an additional Web Dispatcher to load balance HTTP requests to the 'backend' ABAP WebAS system, or will the portal be smart enough to handle the load balancing itself (perhaps based on the information in the landscape configuration)?
2. If the portal itself handles the HTTP load balancing can you point me to documentation (so I can make sure I have proper configuration)?
3. Are there any changes to this with NW2004s Portal (we plan to upgrade soon)?
Thanks in advance! Jeff

Jeff,
Regarding:
Q1. If you create a system object from the "SAP system with load balancing" template in portal and configure the object to point to your CI (msg server), the LB should be handled.
Q2. Portal load balancing is handled by the message server. If you point a test URL to the port of your message server, you will notice that you are issued a redirect the URL of your dialog instance. The web dispatcher is just a proxy (with some intelligence). When a request is made to the WD, it makes a connection to the MSG server, the list of active instances is queried, a redirect is made to that instanct. If you use WD, that connection can be proxied behind a standard URL. If you connect directly to the MSG Server instead, you will notice your URL change, just as it does on the service marketplace.
WDs are good for providing services, masked (proxied) behind virtual names. If you do not want the customer to see a physical URL of the server, use the WD. There are lots of other solutions that can do this too though such as Apache, ISA, Juniper devices, Cisco LDs. WDs have a very low performance threshold though, especially if you use SSL. WD is a performance bottleneck and should be benchmarked to see if it is right for your application.
Q3. No changes this architecture in 04s.
jwise

Bandwidth requirement for accessing SAP via SAPGUI

Hi,
I have ECC 6.0 system on windows. I need connectivity from remote locations to central office where SAP server resides.
How to calculate bandwidth requirement for accessing SAP via SAPGUI from Remote locations?
Regards,
Nirav.

Hello,
please refer to the [Front-end Network Requirements for SAP Solutions|http://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700003943521999E] document.
(The navigation path on Service MarketPlace would be http://service.sap.com/sizing > Sizing Guidelines > Solutions & Platforms, then search for the title above).
Best regards
Rolf-Martin

Macbook requirements for streaming via Apple TV

What are the minimum Macbook requirements for wireless streaming via Apple TV?

Welcome to the Apple Support Communities
See > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5404 If your computer isn't compatible, use AirParrot > http://www.airparrot.com

Is CAL required for SharePoint Foundation 2010?

Is extra CAL required for uploading/downloading docs using SharePoint Foundation 2010? We already have Licensed Windows Server 2008 R2. Ours is an intranet application which will be accessed by 400 intranet users.
If CAL is required then can i use only 1 CAL for my app server to upload/download docs on SP Foundation provided all 400 client requests will go via app server to SP server?

If I want to use sharepoint foundation 2013, I need to have Windows server 2008 R2 / 2012 license & SQL server license (optional). I'm confused in - what kind of windows server license is required & do I also need some other license to use sharepoint
foundation?
How can I provide external user access to my sharepoint environment? Is there any requirement of any other license also?

Help define the requirements for an Oracle Spatial management tool

Hi,
We are developing a tool that, we hope, will be indispensable for all Oracle Spatial and Locator dbas/users. We've released version 1.0, but we need your help to define the requirements for the next version.
What features would you like to have in a management tool for your spatial databases?
The features we've got so far:
1. Viewing of vector data in a map + attributes
2. Loading from shapefiles
3. Exporting to shapefiles
4. Validating metadata, indexes and spatial data.
We are adding editing of vectors in the next version - basic stuff for add, update and delete.
But there must be a lot more. What do you find difficult to do in Oracle Spatial/Locator? What would you like in a tool such as this?
Any feedback either to myself or the forum is much appreciated.
cheers,
Andrew
[email protected]
PS If you like to have a look at what we have done so far, go to http://www.geometryit.com/products/spatialConsole.php

Andrew knows what I have asked for but for others to think about and to start
the ball rolling, here's what they are:
1. Ability to enter own SQL commands but with PARAMETERS for attributes
and shapes as in the following examples:
SELECT ...
FROM my_spatial_table a
WHERE a.ATTRIBUTE = :attr
AND MDSYS.SDO_RELATE(a.shape,:polygon,'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE'
When executed the attribute value is asked for via a input box (data type?)
and the user is asked to define the SDO_GEOMETRY for the :polgygon parameter via mouse clicks on the screen.
Similarly, this would work for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE...
INSERT INTO my_spatial_table (shape) values(:polygon)
The data type of an attribute parameter could be determined in two ways:
a) By querying the Oracle catalog;
b) By using a "PARAMETERS" command before the query as follows
PARAMETERS name type [(size)] [, name type [(size)] ...]
The PARAMETERS declaration has these parts:
name     The name of the parameter.
type     The type of the parameter.
size     The size of the parameter in characters or bytes.
2. When executing an SQL SELECT statement I would like the tool
to suggest the HINTS that are needed to improve performance.
3. Following on from 2, I would like to Tick an option that would return the
EXPLAIN PLAN that the query optimizer used when executing my query.
4. The tool has to support ALL Oracle's spatial vector data types.
5. It would be nice to be able to work with GeoRasters. Since Spatial Console
imports/exports shapefiles why not the same for rasters. However, the problem
with supporting foreign data formats is WHERE DO YOU STOP!!!!!
6. You could allow for the styling of the Spatial Console to be stored in the MapViewer catalogs or use the MapViewer catalogs when styling an Sdo_Geometry if it exists (I note that your tool extracts the SDO_METADATA
why not the MapViewer metadata as well)?
regards
S.

Purpose of instructor led training requirement for OCP?

What is the purpose of requiring OCP candidates to take an instructor led course? It all seems a bit random / superfluous. Costly too if one does not have an employer willing to pay for the training.
My Oracle Press "OCA/OCP Oracle Database 11g All-in-One Exam Guide" doesn't even hint that classes are a requirement for the OCP; the most said is: "The OCA qualification is based on two examinations; the OCP qualification requires passing a third examination." (pg. XXIX). An incomplete characterization, correct?
And "To prepare for the OCA/OCP examinations, you can attend Oracle University instructor-led training courses, you can study Oracle University online learning material, or you can read this book." (pg. XXIX). Prepare for the exams, sure. But why would such a book omit the not insignificant detail that a perhaps expensive course is required to get the OCP? Seems discourteous to the reader.
From http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=244#5 via http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=198&p_org_id=&lang=
I say it seems random and superfluous because of the following list:
"These foundation courses meet the Hands On Course Requirement for OCP-Level certification:
* Oracle Database 11g: Introduction to SQL
* Oracle Database 11g: Introduction to SQL Ed 1 LVC
* Oracle Database 11g: SQL Fundamentals I
* Oracle Database 11g: SQL Fundamentals l Ed 1 LVC
* Oracle Database 11g: SQL and PL/SQL Fundamentals
* Oracle Database 11g: SQL and PL/SQL Fundamentals Ed 1 LVC
* Oracle Database 11g: Develop PL/SQL Program Units
* Oracle Database 11g: Administration Workshop I
* Oracle Database 11g: Administration Workshop I Ed 1.1 LVC
* Oracle Database 11g: Administration Workshop II
* Oracle Database 11g: Data Warehousing Fundamentals"
A modest Intro to SQL course will count? But an OCA will already have that knowledge. Obviously, one should choose a course with higher-level content. But I'm not sure I understand the logic of the OCA-grade courses being eligible. And for those funding certification without financial assistance from an employer, the question that suggests is this: what is the least expensive way to satisfy the "instructor led" course requirement? I cheapest price I see from Oracle is a 3 day class costing $1,800. It would also cost 3 days of vacation time, or unpaid leave, if an employer is not supportive of certification.

Dana N wrote:
Thanks for your thoughtful reply Hans.
TO expose the candidate to techniques related to the new features rather than traditional techniques that are commonplace in the industry.That makes sense to me. But many of us like to tinker with new features on our own.In my experience, many, many more people want the OCP without doing any work. Some will use pure memorization or out and cheating to get there.
It's unfortunate that you and I get penalized by those.
>
And to ensure that the has had at least some hands-on time, instead of only pure theory. While some people may get hands-on at work, many others do not
have that opportunityh, especially in the are of new features.Then it might make sense for OCP certification to allow submission of proof of work experience in place of the HOC, as is the case with other professional certifications.
Yes, that would be nice.
But difficult to verify. and you would be surprised how many organizations have very narrow definitions of the job. Experimenting not allowed in some places.
It all seems a bit random / superfluous. Sad, from an instructors and OCP's point of view, to hear you think of it that way.I don't mean to say there isn't anything new any of us couldn't pick up, say, even from an Intro to SQL course. There's a vastness to most technology topics and we can't master every facet. But the cost/benefit ratio may be terribly low for those who are already Oracle professionals with many years of on the job experience. The reality as well is that some instructors are duds--that's the case anywhere. And for my learning style, I prefer self-guided / on-my-own study.
Costly too if one does not have an employer willing to pay for the training.No doubt.
My Oracle Press "OCA/OCP Oracle Database 11g All-in-One Exam Guide" doesn't even hint that classes are a requirement for the OCP; the most said is: "The
OCA qualification is based on two examinations; the OCP qualification requires passing a third examination." (pg. XXIX). An incomplete characterization, correct?A topic to discuss with the authors, and publisher. We (the user community with whom you are talking) have little to no control over this.Wonder if the authors participate in these forums. I realize you, as a user, have no control over this. But a book blessed by Oracle via Oracle Press, I respectfully submit, can and should do better--by including details about the HOC requirement.
Some do. But much more effetive would be to lodge a formal complaint or inquiry.
"These foundation courses meet the Hands On Course Requirement for OCP-Level certification:
...All of which will ensure you have had time becoming acquainted with SQLPLus, DBControl, and perhaps SQLDeveloper.I already use all 3 tools. Would love to take all the courses listed; but I'm not independently wealthy or otherwise.
So would I. ;-)
As well as logging in (you would be surprised how many OCA candidates do not know how), these all give you an opportunity to issue SQL and PL/SQL
commands. Scary, but seems beside the point. The HOC requirement is one solution to this problem, but it seems like a sub-optimal one. Again, this punishes Oracle professionals already working in the field who'd like to become certified. Why is there no regard for them? One way to correct this, if this is a genuine concern on Oracle's part, is to include a "live" aspect to the exams. Then, if this causes a fail, those who flunk might be interested in taking HOCs to remedy this. In this day and age, I'm certain training could involve interactive SQL*PLUS sessions, etc. Only a failure of imagination and will could prevent I suspect; particularly in a world of virtualization. I'd consider a redesign of exams before I'd require people to pay for classes they may be unable to pay for. It's a bit of an insult to working Oracle professionals who want to add certification.
I agree to some extent. Again, the issue is the consistency in experience. I have met people with 10 years of experience, and others with 10 times 1 year of experience.
A modest Intro to SQL course will count? But an OCA will already have that knowledge. I wish this was consistently true. Then I mispoke. But the HOC still punishes existing Oracle professionals.
I sympathize. I'm an independent, and all exams and certification costs come out of my own (corporate=me) pocket. But life in the professional fast lane is not
cheap. This topic has been the source of some contention for quite some time.
Unfortunately a number of people have been unscrupulous in their method of getting certification - cheating, using gunners, and so on - and I see this as one of
the few ways to combat the issue. If the cheating issue is just left alone, the value of OCP (and any other certification) is effectively lost.The unscrupulous, I'm afraid, will always be with us. This problem is not solved, I'm also afraid, by requiring a costly HOC. It is in my opinion one potential solution of many, and not at all the best one. I wonder how other vendors with certifications handle this. I do know that some industry-generic certifications require proof of X years of work in the field (e.g. GISPs), as well as providing proof of various contributions to the field. This could be gamed as well I suppose. But the honest should not be punished along with the dishonest.Basically I agree with the sentiment. Implementation is the issue.
>
Bottom line: in my view, a few alternate solutions to the HOC are:
1) Allow submission of work credentials to substitute for the HOC
2) Incorporate hands-on aspects to the exam, e.g. a SQL*PLUS simulator.
I'm sure the brilliant minds at Oracle, or a suitable contractor, could easily accomplish #2. And #1 might be a true bar-raiser. It seems highly unlikely to me that, say, requiring an Intro to SQL HOC course raises the bar more than a few millimeters.There have been many discussions around this. Several of us have even considered non-vendor certifications as a route to accomplish this.
It is an imperfect world. But hopefully the steps will correct some of the deficiencies.
I am sure Paul and the rest of the Certification team would be happy to hear more feedback on how to implement practical verifiable real-world experience alternatives to the HOC that do not increase Oracle's costs.
>
Since both are unlikely to happen any time soon, what is the least expensive option for the HOC and where do I find a list of courses and institutions that offer them? In my view, Oracle should provide this information as a courtesy. No reason not to unless there is a revenue motive; and the author of the blog posts you sent me assures us the addition of the HOC is not a revenue enhancement maneuver. I'd be more inclined to believe it if those words were backed-up with helpful actions like the one I've proposed--since such a thing seems not to exist.All courses and course locations are available through http://education.oracle.com (and have been available for years) as well as the price. Oracle's policy does not allow for much price variation for education. The exception is when bulk purchased are negotiated, which is outside what you and I can talk with them about.

Transfer Requirement for Goods Receipt Item

Hi All,
We are trying to create Transfer Order for Goods Receipt items using an ITS mobile application.We are using the function module L_TO_CREATE_TR to create Transfer Order by passing the Transfer Requirement from the Goods Receipt as an input to the function module. Our requirement is to create one Transfer Orde per Goods Receipt item. We need to create Transfer Order for the items simulatneously from different terminals.Since we have only one Transfer Requirement for the entire Goods Receipt document, we are not able to create Transfer Orders simultaneously because of the system lock (Transfer Requirement is locked).
Is it possible to create separate Transfer Rquirement for the individual items in the Goods Receipt via customizing/User exit.
Your guidance in this regard will be great help for us.
Regards,
Shaju

Hi Dirk,
Thank you for your reply.
Our enduser will be using handheld device for Transfer Order creation. The user will pick the GR item material from one storage type (902) and the Transfer Requirement will be locked at this moment.Later while placing the SU in destination bin the user will scan the destination bin and the Transfer Order will be created at the time of scanning. Till the completion of the entire process the Transfer Requirement will be locked and no one else can pick the materials of the same GR from 902 storage type.
We are trying to create Transfer Requirements for each Goods Receipt Item and we are not able to find any user exit in Goods Receipt Creation or any customizing option.
Can you please check and help us to resolve the same.
Regards,
Shaju
Edited by: shaju tv on Apr 5, 2010 11:40 AM

What are the ports required for the Audio, Video and A/V conferencing when the following end points are enabled for QoS in Lync 2013 server?

Hi All,
What are the ports required for the Audio, Video and A/V conferencing when the following clients are enabled for QoS in Lync 2013 server?
Client Type
Port range and Protocol required for Audio
Port range and Protocol required for
Video
Port range and Protocol required for
A/Vconferencing
Windows Desktop Client
Windows mobile App
Iphone
Ipad
Andriod phone
Andriod Tablet
MAC desktop client
Please advise. Many Thanks.

Out of the box, 1024-65535 for all of the client ports. :)
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398833.aspx
You'll want to tune your client ports a bit
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204760.aspx as seen here, and then the client ports would use those ranges which is easier to set QoS markings. I'm not sure the mobile clients respect that setting.
Elan's got the best writeup for Windows clients here:
http://www.shudnow.net/2013/02/16/enabling-qos-for-lync-server-2013-and-various-clients-part-1/
However, the marking of the packets is the tricky part. Windows can do it via Group Policy, but for the other clients you'll need to have the network specifically prioritize ports regardless of DSCP markings. You have to do it based on ports
as the traffic could be peer to peer.
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications
This forum post is based upon my personal experience and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Checking for Patch Requirements for Extended Support of 11.5.10

Hello
I am trying to check for a client that they are meeting the minimum requirements to remain on Extended Support. They use 11.5.10.2 and run that on a 11.2.0.3 db
The method I am using is:
1.
Check to see what is Shared and Licensed via OAM.
This will tell me the products that we must licensed and shared and which we must ensure we meet the minimum
2.
Go to Patch Requirements for Extended Support of Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11.5.10 [ID 883202.1]
and ensure that we are meeting these.
Seems very tedious ... (over 60 products to check) is there another way?
DA

Pl see if this MOS Doc can help
How to Verify the Versions for the 11.5.10 Minimum Baseline Requirement (Note 883202.1) [ID 1271621.1]
Pl also see
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_11i_patch_wizard_extended_support_baseline
HTH
Srini

How to maintain year of experience required for a position?

Hi All,
There is a very requirement for a position like "3 years of experience as Executive" I dont know how to maintain this requirement in SAP. Right now we have created a qualification named "Executive Experience" with a time scale assigned to it with a validity period of one year so HR dept must change the scale evey year. It works but it's not best practice. I know if there is a way we can use employee past and current work history to determine the level of experience and also how to define this requirement in position profile.

Hi Dilek,
I maintained all those thing. But i have to do the selection process on the basis of position with year of experience. While doing the selection process via Position or Qualification its picking up the exact applicant. I created a career as 3 years as you said so that the minimum year of experience for that position is 3 years. Then where i can give the year of experience for the applicant? Even though i maintained the previous employer details as 2 years the system is picking up the applicant. Logic wise how to do this?
Please help me to sort out this problem.
Thanks in advance,
Magesh S.

ISSUE: "This domain controller must register a DNS SRV resource record, which is required for replication to function correctly"

so we currently have three domain controllers set up, two of them on 2012r2 and one of them on 2008r2. prior to any of these domain controllers being added to the domain there was only one, running on 2003r2. the 2003r2 server was up and running when the
first 2012r2 was added and that's when running 'dcdiag /e /c /v' would yield an issue with "_ldap._tcp.9a5f3c17-e7ac-48f7-ab42-bf1ea621a6f5.domains._msdcs.cmedia.local" in the DNS portion of the diagnostics, specifically:
TEST: Records registration (RReg)
Network Adapter [00000010] Microsoft Hyper-V Network Adapter:
Error:
Missing SRV record at DNS server 192.168.22.4:
_ldap._tcp.9a5f3c17-e7ac-48f7-ab42-bf1ea621a6f5.domains._msdcs.cmedia.local
after adding the second 2012r2 to the domain, this issue is still there... adding the 2008r2 server to the domain and running BPA it gives the following:
Title:
This domain controller must register a DNS SRV resource record, which is required for replication to function correctly
Severity:
Error
Date:
7/3/2014 11:24:48 AM
Category:
Configuration
Issue:
The "DcByGuid" DNS service (SRV) resource record that advertises this server as an available domain controller in the domain and ensures correct replication is not registered. All domain controllers (but not RODCs) in the domain must register this record.
Impact:
Other member computers and domain controllers in the domain or forest will not be able to locate this domain controller. This domain controller will not be able to provide a full suite of services.
Resolution:
Ensure that "DcByGuid" is not configured in the "DnsAvoidRegisteredRecords" list, either through Group Policy or through the registry. Restart the Netlogon service. Verify that the DNS service (SRV) resource record "_ldap._tcp.9a5f3c17-e7ac-48f7-ab42-bf1ea621a6f5.domains._msdcs.cmedia.local", pointing to the local domain controller "CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local", is registered in DNS.
More information about this best practice and detailed resolution procedures: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=126968
I've tried scanning and then re-scanning every single entry in DNS Manager and do not see any reference to this specific GUID mentioned, nor do I see any other domain controllers referenced that should not be in there. The two 2012r2 and the 2008r2 domain
controllers are the only ones listed in DNS Manager... the 2003r2 mentioned earlier failed and was removed.

Just to chime in, I noticed that you said you have one 2008 R2 DC, and two 2012 DCs.
I also noticed in the ipconfig /all that all DCs are pointint to themselves for DNS. We usually like to see them point to a partner, then itslelf as the second entry, w hether loopback or by its own IP.
Based on that, what I suggest to level the playing field by choosing the WIndows 2008 R2 DC as the first DNS on all DCs and only administer DNS using that DC. The reason I chose that is because of the least common denominator is what we rather use so we
don't invoke any new features in the newer 2012 DNS console that 2008 R2 may not understand. After that's done, on each DC run (and you can use a PowerShell window to run this):
Rename the system32\config\netlogon.dns and netlogon.dnb files by suffixing ".old" to the file.
ipconfig /registerdns
net stop netlogon
net start netlogon
Then re-run the dcdiag /e /c /v.
Post your results, please.
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCSE 2012, MCITP EA & MCTS Windows 2008/R2, Exchange 2013, 2010 EA & 2007, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
I thought the DNS entries were supposed to be the other way around? point to themselves first and a partner as secondary? regardless, as requested, I've changed it to what you've prescribed where they point to the 2008r2 server as the primary with themselves
as the secondary. I've also followed the steps to what seems like refreshing the DNS? on each of the DCs. Here's the output from dcdiag /e /c /v
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
* Verifying that the local machine CM-DC1-NY01, is a Directory Server.
Home Server = CM-DC1-NY01
* Connecting to directory service on server CM-DC1-NY01.
* Identified AD Forest.
Collecting AD specific global data
* Collecting site info.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory
=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the sites
Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia
,DC=local
Getting ISTG and options for the site
* Identifying all servers.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=nt
DSDsa),.......
The previous call succeeded....
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the list of servers
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 3 DC(s). Testing 3 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC1-NY01
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Connectivity
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC3-NY01
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Connectivity
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC4-NY01
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC1-NY01
Starting test: Advertising
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as a time server
The DS CM-DC1-NY01 is advertising as a GC.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Advertising
Starting test: CheckSecurityError
* Dr Auth: Beginning security errors check!
Found KDC CM-DC1-NY01 for domain cmedia.local in site Default-First-Site-Name
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC1-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
[CM-DC1-NY01] No security related replication errors were found on this DC! To target the connection to a
specific source DC use /ReplSource:<DC>.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test CheckSecurityError
Starting test: CutoffServers
* Configuration Topology Aliveness Check
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: FrsSysVol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test FrsSysVol
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC1-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/a29d12f1-2869-44bf-8e43-adf7ddf33865/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\CM-DC1-NY01\netlogon
Verified share \\CM-DC1-NY01\sysvol
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
CM-DC1-NY01 is in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local
Checking for CN=CM-DC1-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuratio
n,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local on 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: OutboundSecureChannels
* The Outbound Secure Channels test
** Did not run Outbound Secure Channels test because /testdomain: was not entered
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 16109 to 1073741823
* CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 4609 to 5108
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 4609 to 5108
* rIDNextRID: 4629
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000002F
Time Generated: 07/08/2014 13:19:14
Event String:
Time Provider NtpClient: No valid response has been received from manually configured peer 0.ca.pool.ntp.org
after 8 attempts to contact it. This peer will be discarded as a time source and NtpClient will attempt to discover a n
ew peer with this DNS name. The error was: The peer is unreachable.
Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: Topology
* Configuration Topology Integrity Check
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test Topology
Starting test: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference) CN=CM-DC1-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local
and backlink on
CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local are
correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=chiefmed
ia,DC=local
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on CN=CM-DC1-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local are correct.
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test VerifyReferences
Starting test: VerifyReplicas
......................... CM-DC1-NY01 passed test VerifyReplicas
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC3-NY01
Starting test: Advertising
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as a time server
The DS CM-DC3-NY01 is advertising as a GC.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Advertising
Starting test: CheckSecurityError
* Dr Auth: Beginning security errors check!
Found KDC CM-DC1-NY01 for domain cmedia.local in site Default-First-Site-Name
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC3-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
Checking for CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 2 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
[CM-DC3-NY01] No security related replication errors were found on this DC! To target the connection to a
specific source DC use /ReplSource:<DC>.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test CheckSecurityError
Starting test: CutoffServers
* Configuration Topology Aliveness Check
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: FrsSysVol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test FrsSysVol
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC3-NY01 on DC CM-DC3-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/5e9d1971-39ca-484c-922d-411c2364c96e/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC3-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC CM-DC3-NY01.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\CM-DC3-NY01\netlogon
Verified share \\CM-DC3-NY01\sysvol
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
CM-DC3-NY01 is in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local
Checking for CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuratio
n,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local on 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: OutboundSecureChannels
* The Outbound Secure Channels test
** Did not run Outbound Secure Channels test because /testdomain: was not entered
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 16109 to 1073741823
* CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 15109 to 15608
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 15109 to 15608
* rIDNextRID: 15110
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: Topology
* Configuration Topology Integrity Check
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test Topology
Starting test: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference) CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local
and backlink on
CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local are
correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=chiefmed
ia,DC=local
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC3-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on CN=CM-DC3-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local are correct.
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test VerifyReferences
Starting test: VerifyReplicas
......................... CM-DC3-NY01 passed test VerifyReplicas
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\CM-DC4-NY01
Starting test: Advertising
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as a time server
The DS CM-DC4-NY01 is advertising as a GC.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Advertising
Starting test: CheckSecurityError
* Dr Auth: Beginning security errors check!
Found KDC CM-DC1-NY01 for domain cmedia.local in site Default-First-Site-Name
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC4-NY01 on DC CM-DC1-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
Checking for CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 2 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
[CM-DC4-NY01] No security related replication errors were found on this DC! To target the connection to a
specific source DC use /ReplSource:<DC>.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test CheckSecurityError
Starting test: CutoffServers
* Configuration Topology Aliveness Check
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the alive system replication topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: FrsSysVol
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test FrsSysVol
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Confi
guration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configur
ation,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC1-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN
=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC CM-DC4-NY01 on DC CM-DC4-NY01.
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :LDAP/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :LDAP/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187._msdcs.cmedia.local
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/37830012-1f10-43c9-a0ff-2a0e8a912187/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01
* SPN found :HOST/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia
* SPN found :GC/CM-DC4-NY01.cmedia.local/cmedia.local
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC CM-DC4-NY01.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=cmedia,DC=local
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\CM-DC4-NY01\netlogon
Verified share \\CM-DC4-NY01\sysvol
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
CM-DC4-NY01 is in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local
Checking for CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain DC=cmedia,DC=local o
n 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuratio
n,DC=cmedia,DC=local in domain CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local on 3 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: OutboundSecureChannels
* The Outbound Secure Channels test
** Did not run Outbound Secure Channels test because /testdomain: was not entered
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=cmedia,DC=local
Latency information for 4 entries in the vector were ignored.
4 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's
no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 16109 to 1073741823
* CM-DC1-NY01.cmedia.local is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 15609 to 16108
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 15609 to 16108
* rIDNextRID: 15609
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: Topology
* Configuration Topology Integrity Check
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
* Analyzing the connection topology for DC=cmedia,DC=local.
* Performing upstream (of target) analysis.
* Performing downstream (of target) analysis.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test Topology
Starting test: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference) CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local
and backlink on
CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cmedia,DC=local are
correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=chiefmed
ia,DC=local
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=CM-DC4-NY01,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=cmedia,D
C=local
and backlink on CN=CM-DC4-NY01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=cmedia,DC=local are correct.
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test VerifyReferences
Starting test: VerifyReplicas
......................... CM-DC4-NY01 passed test VerifyReplicas

Reducing time required for ABAP-only copyback (system copy) process

Our company is investigating how to reduce the amount of time it takes to perform a copyback (system copy) from a production ABAP system to a QA system. We use a similar process for all ABAP-only systems in our landscape, ranging from 3.1h systems to ECC6.0 ABAP-only systems on both DB2 and Oracle database platforms, and the process takes approximately two weeks of effort from end-to-end (this includes time required to resolve any issues encountered).
Here is an overview of the process we use:
u2022     Create and release backup transports of key system tables and IDu2019s (via client copy) in the QA system to be overwritten (including RFC-related tables, partner profile and IDOC setup-related tables, scheduled background jobs, archiving configuration, etc.).
u2022     Reconfigure the landscape transport route to remove QA system from transport landscape.
u2022                    Create a virtual import queue attached to the development system to capture all transports released from development during the QA downtime.
u2022     Take a backup of the target production database.
u2022     Overwrite the QA destination database with the production copy.
u2022     Localize the database (performed by DBAu2019s).
u2022     Overview of Basis tasks (for smaller systems, this process can be completed in one or two days, but for larger systems, this process takes closer to 5 days because of the BDLS runtime and the time it takes to import larger transport requests and the user ID client copy transports):
o     Import the SAP license.
o     Execute SICK to check the system.
o     Execute BDLS to localize the system.
o     Clear out performance statistics and scheduled background jobs.
o     Import the backup transports.
o     Import the QA client copy of user IDu2019s.
o     Import/reschedule background jobs.
o     Perform any system-specific localization (example: for a CRM system with TREX, delete the old indexes).
u2022     Restore the previous transport route to include the QA system back into the landscape.
u2022     Import all transports released from the development system during the QA system downtime.
Our companyu2019s procedure is similar to the procedure demonstrated in this 2010 TechEd session:
http://www.sapteched.com/10/usa/edu_sessions/session.htm?id=825
Does anyone have experience with a more efficient process that minimizes the downtime of the QA system?
Also, has anyone had a positive experience with the system copy automation tools offered by various companies (e.g., UC4, Tidal)?
Thank you,
Matt

Hi,
> One system that immediately comes to mind has a database size of 2TB. While we have reduced the copyback time for this system by running multiple BDLS sessions in parallel, that process still takes a long time to complete. Also, for the same system, importing the client copy transports of user ID's takes about 8 hours (one full workday) to complete.
>
For BDLS run, I agree with Olivier.
> The 2 weeks time also factors in time to resolve any issues that are encountered, such as issues with the database restore/localization process or issues resulting from human error. An example of human error could be forgetting to request temporary ID's to be created in the production system for use in the QA system after it has been initially restored (our standard production Basis role does not contain all authorizations required for the QA localization effort).
>
For the issues that you encounter because of system copy, you can minimize this time period as you would be doing it on periodic basis (making some task list) and you can make a note of issues that you faced in previous run. So, normally i don't count it as system copy time
Thanks
Sunny

Does not meet the system requirement for installing BB App World

I bought a Curve 8520 in Singapore yesterday. When i tried to download App world into this phone, it says "my phone does not meet the system requirement for the software". does it refer to hardware specification or the BB O/s version on the phone. How can fix it because being able to use App world is one of the purposes that i buy a BB.
Also, How about MS Live Messenger , facebook ? Do I need to install them seperately through App World?
Please help!

Hi there!
Please see these links for reference:
http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/appworld/download.jsp#tab_tab_system_requirements
http://www.blackberry.com/app_includes/devicesoftware/appworld/appworld_availability_en.html
A key component in accessing AppWorld is your carrier -- if they are not delivering it, then you can't get it. If you don't have an adequate plan from them that incudes it, then you can't get it. Hence, if you meet the hardware requirements AND it is available in your country, then you need to contact your carrier to find out how you can get it via their network.
All that said, AppWorld is merely a storefront, vending apps developed by others...there are many other storefronts available that don't have the same restrictions.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

What are the System Requirements for Web Server hosting Adobe Air application

Working on a project that is using Adobe Air . The Adobe support site has system requirements for the client side application, but for the server side, what are the system requirements?
Using a Windows server, would expect to have approx. 100 concurrent connections at any given time.

Adobe AIR applications are installed on the end user's computer. They are not hosted on a web server. You can deploy an AIR file, which is the installer file for an AIR application, via your web server.

Is VIA 4-in-1 required for Win2K?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for