Is Windows 2003 Server supported as a server that MA can migrate?

Will Migration Accelerator support Windows Server 2003 as a source server that it can migrate to Azure?
Tom Hickling

Hi,
Thanks for your post.
According to the blog:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/srinathv/archive/2014/09/17/prerequisite-and-support-matrix-microsoft-migration-accelerator-for-azure.aspx
The following Operating Systems could migrate to Azure:
Windows Server 2008 R2 (64 bit), R2 SP1 (64 bit) - Web, Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter editions.
Windows Server 2012 (64 bit), R2 (64 bit) - Standard, Datacenter, Essentials editions.
It seems like there is no Windows server 2003. So i am afraid that it is not supported.
Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Similar Messages

Installing mini sap on windows 2003 server..............

hi friends,i want to install mini sap on windows 2003 server, i have two cds for that but i m not getting how to install this,n also want to know,can it be installed on windows 2003 server or it can be installed on windows 2000 only.
please help me out
thanks

Hi,
Depending on which mini sap version you are trying to install. If you have 2 CD's, it means that it is an old version, for starting with 6.2 mini sap comes in 3 CD's (1 Kernel + 2 Database). As for the steps to install, just insert the kernel cd and an HTML file will pop up with the steps you need to do before, during and after the installation. As for installation issues please refer to:
http://www.sap-press.com/support.cfm?account=&product=H958
Regards,
Lachker

Oracle 9i on Windows 2003 server - DBCA error

1. This is the error message that I get when I am trying to install the 9.2.0.3 software in a new oracle home. There is a 10g database which sits in a different Oracle home. The OUI runs smoothly until it comes to the point where the Database Config Assistant tool starts running and then I get this error and the installer hangs. Could anyone let me know why I might be getting this error.
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: initializeCluster
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.nativesystem.WindowsSystem.initializeCluster(WindowsSystem.java:390)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes.initializeCluster(GetActiveNodes.java:260)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes$ClusterWareThread.<init>(Compiled Code)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes.<init>(GetActiveNodes.java:139)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes.create(GetActiveNodes.java:158)
     at
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.backend.Verifier.isRawFeasible(Compiled Code)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.backend.Verifier.processRawConfigFile(Compiled Code)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.ui.ProgressOnlyHost.performOperation(ProgressOnlyHost.java:138)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.backend.Host.startOperation(Host.java:2171)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.Dbca.execute(Dbca.java:99)
     at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbca.Dbca.main(Dbca.java:161)
Agent Config Asst
Parameter "orahome" = C:\Oracle\product\ora92
Parameter "nodeinfo" = NO_VALUE
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: initializeCluster
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.nativesystem.WindowsSystem.initializeCluster(WindowsSystem.java:390)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes.initializeCluster(GetActiveNodes.java:260)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes$ClusterWareThread.<init>(Compiled Code)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes.<init>(GetActiveNodes.java:139)
     at oracle.ops.mgmt.cluster.GetActiveNodes.create(GetActiveNodes.java:158)
     at oracle.agent.AgentCA.configureOPS(AgentCA.java:74)
     at oracle.agent.AgentCA.main(AgentCA.java:39)
Exception in thread "main"
FYI - I have installed the OUI patch Oracle Universal Installer release 2.2.0.18.0 for Windows and the Oracle9i Database Release 2 (9.2.0.3.0) Patch Set for Windows after I installed the 9.2.0.1 database software.
I then tried to run the DBCA tool from the 'Start > Programs>Oracle 9ihome>' menu to create the new Oracle 9.2.0.3 database but the DBCA assistant would not start up.
2. I have a related question:
Has anybody performed a downgrade of Oracle 10g database to Oracle 9.2.0.3 database using export/import?
Can you perform a full database export of the Oracle 10g database using the 9.2.0.3 export utility and then perform a full database import into Oracle 10g? I have read some documentation that states this is not possible. Can anyone verify or confirm how they did this migration? So is the only option then to perform a table or user level export?
Also, if both the databases reside on the same Windows 2003 server box, how can you ensure that the source database files are not overwritten?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Vishal.

It only happens when you have oracle 10g and Oracle 9i on the same machine.
You can run 9i dbca successfully, if you rename the 10g "orasrvm.DLL" found in any 10g BIN directory. Rename it back after you are 9i dbca is complete.
Please complete details for this issue see
http://orafaq.net/maillist/oracle-l/2004/10/08/0335.htm
Thanks
Ravisayal

How to view failed updates on Windows 2003 Server ?

Hello,
Can anyone tell me how I can view what Windows Updates failed and why, on a Windows 2003 server that uses Configuration Manager?
Thanks
Stuart

You won't find the solution in ConfigMgr. It has done it's job and the updates have been delivered. The fact that the updates cannot install is a Windows problem. You need to be looking at the EVENT logs.
Gerry Hampson | Blog:
www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
@gerryhampson

Whether Oracle 8.1.6 Supports Windows 2003 Server/Windows 2000 Adv. Server

Dear All,
Whether Oracle 8.1.6 Supports Windows 2003 Server/Windows 2000 Adv. Server.
I tried it in windows 2003 server but i couldn't. Atlease tell me wheather it support windows 2000 adv. server. This is my first dba job.
Under Doc ID: 66397.1 saying Oracle 8.1.6 Not Support Windows NT Server 4.0 Terminal Server Edition.
Under Doc ID: 77627.1 saying Oracle 8.1.6 Supports Windows 2000 Support.
Please help me out urgently.

Since you have access to Metalink, you could be looking at the Certify tab to find this information. But, the answer is that 8.1.6 is no longer supported by Oracle. However, you should be able to install it on Win 2000 advanced server. You just can't get any support for it.
The earliest version of db supported on Win 2003 was either 9.0 or 9.2, but 9.0 is desupported now as well.

CSA 5.1 windows 2003 server 64bit support

Dear Netpros,
Could anyone tell me CSA 5.1 support windows 2003 server 64 bit OS.
I am trying with this machine but not installing.
SWAMI

Currently CSA does not support 64-bit platforms. This is because Microsoft has included a feature called patchguard or something like it in those platforms in order not to allow to touch Kernel, yet this is the way CSA works.
Microsoft and Cisco still working on it. It's likely that CSA v6 will support 64-bit platforms but there's no release date yet.

RAID drivers that support Windows 2003 server for Qosmio G30-153

Hi,
Where can i find RAID drivers that support Windows 2003 server for Qosmio G-series(G30-153 )
Thanks in Advance.
Abdul Hameed

Hi
Windows Server 2003 should support the XP drivers.
So try to search for the RAID XP drivers!
regards :)

Maximum User Accounts supported by Windows-2003 server

I want to know the maximum limit of User Accounts supported by Window 2003 Server Logically. I think physically it depends upon Hardware and network infrastructure. So want to know logical limit. I heard about window 2000, that it supports near about 16000
and NT server 4.0 supports 40000 User accounts. But there is no source on the web to know about win2k3's Maximum Users account limit...
Thanks...

This article documents the scalability limits of Active Directory, including W2k3:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756101.aspx
Per the article, the maximum number of security principals (total of all users, groups, computers, and all objects with SIDs ever created) in Windows Server 2003 AD is 2^30 or 1,073,741,823.
Richard Mueller - MVP Directory Services

How to Install 64-bit "Generic / Text Only" print driver on a 32-bit Windows 2003 Server?

Hi All,
In a nutshell, I need to Install the 64-bit Generic / Text Only print driver on a 32-bit Windows 2003 Server’s “Generic / Text Only 32-bit print queue.
The problem is that there is no Driver-Disk to get the drivers. I’ve been able to isolate 14 files related to the 64 bit drivers from a Windows 7 x64 computer and copy them to a temp folder on the Windows 2003 x32 server. When I try to add the 64 bit driver
to the Windows 2003 x32 server, it wants a *.inf file, which I don’t have and can’t find.
Because Microsoft will no longer support Windows XP, my client is replacing all of their Point-of-Sale Windows XP x32 systems with Windows 7 x64. They use Terminal Services (Remote Desktop) to connect to a Windows 2003 x32 server to use the POS system. The
POS software redirects LPT1 back to the local Generic / Text Only printer. This works great for XP x32.
When we use the Terminal Services POS software on the new Windows 7 x64 system, none of the labels print out because it’s redirected in 32-bit back to the local Windows 7 x64 Generic / Text Only 64-bit printer.
This will be a huge issue for me if I can’t get this to work.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions and help! -Rob

those may be helpful...
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a129f49a-0216-41f0-b190-3efb46fbb8ac/generic-text-only-driver-on-windows-2008-server-r2?forum=winserverprint
http://blogs.technet.com/b/yongrhee/archive/2009/09/14/how-to-add-64-bit-print-drivers-on-32-bit-windows-server-2003-or-windows-server-2008-print-server.aspx
Best,
Howtodo

Crystal Ras 9 on Windows 2003 Server, IIS6.0, single threaded?

We have just migrated from Windows 2000 server to Windows 2003 Server over the weekend. We ran into an issue with Crystal Ras 9.0 where the server serving up reports slower that our previous box. We are using IIS 6.0 and .net 2.0 framework with 1.1 installed for backward compat on our some of our old legacy codes. From what our developers can tell, the issue seems to be Crystal Ras queuing up the request and process them one at a time. That didn't happen before the migration. In fact, we also saw it working in our test environment before the migration. Once the pool is filled no further reports are generated which causes all report to stop which also starts to hang our server. They symptoms is worst under heavy user load. We tested with 6 simultaneous users and all 6 are done at the same time no matter the size of the report. Even the one that fail with an error message came up at the exact same time.
Are there anyway we can adjust the IIS pools and or Crystal Ras to support additional threads? We are connecting to Windows 2008 SQL Server EE. Any suggestions and or help is appreciated. I cannot find any references that would help us diagnose this further.
Also, if you can also detail the cost to buying a phone case, that would be helpful as well.
Thanks
-atiwat

Since you are not changing the version of RAS, I am not sure why the queuing would be different on different Operating Systems? You may want to check on how the queuing is setup on the WIN 200 server and duplicate that on the WIN 2003 server. Also, RAS has a limited number of licenses out of the box. Ensure that you are using the same license on both environments.
Re. phone support. You can obtain a phone case here:
http://store.businessobjects.com/store/bobjamer/DisplayProductByTypePage&parentCategoryID=&categoryID=11522300
However, please note that support of version 9 products terminated years ago, so you will not be able to get support for your version. To get phone support, you will have to upgrade to a supported version of RAS (XI r2 at minimum).
Ludek
BTW.; Windows 2008 SQL Server EE came way after RAS / CR 9 and has thus not been tested in this environment...

IPod Shuffle (2nd Generation) Windows 2003 Server

Hey All,
Having a hard time getting my iPod to sync. Getting this error. "The iPod cannot be synced. An unknown error occured (-48).
I have been researching these forums on a solution and its directing me to update the iTunes BUT, the latest version of iTunes
is not supported on my Windows 2003 Server.
Also, Tried to do a restore and hitting a deasd end there also, "The iPod software update server could not be contacted".
I guess at this point I am confused as to whether the problem is with my ITunes or iPod.
Yes I have an internet connection that works and have dis-abled the anti-virus.
Where do I go from here?
Confused.
Nate

Did this previously work (with this shuffle and computer), and it's not working now for some reason? Or is this the first time you are trying to use this shuffle with this computer?
I ask because, according to the 2nd gen shuffle specs
http://support.apple.com/kb/SP27
Windows 2003 Server is not a supported version of Windows (unless it is considered "later" than Windows XP). If that shuffle worked previously with the same OS, I guess it is supported... Also, is the version of iTunes "7.4 or later" and does the PC have USB 2.0 (not 1.1) ports.
Tried to do a restore and hitting a deasd end there also, "The iPod software update server could not be contacted".
That seems to come up occasionally. When you do a Restore, iTunes checks with a server at Apple over the Internet to get the latest version of software for the iPod. Possible causes are (1) that server at Apple being unavailable at that moment, (2) a problem with your ISP Internet connection at that moment, or (3) a problem with your computer's Intenet connect at that moment. To comfirm it's not (2) or (3), I would restart your computer and check some other apps that use the Internet (like a web browser or email app) to make sure everything it working properly. Then, immediately try doing a Restore again.

HP OFFICEJET PRO 8500A PLUS on Windows 2003 Server

I'm trying to install the Windows 2003 driver for the HP OFFICEJET PRO 8500A PLUS but the installtion halts and says the operating system is not supported. The O/S is fully patched. Does anyone have a go around for this? I simply need it for Terminal Services users.

Where did you get the driver pack from? Also are you running a 32 or 64 bit version of Windows 2003 Server?
This is the version of the driver pack you need: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=bi-105951-1&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en...
Let me know if this is what you already downloaded and also the questions from above.
Thanks!
Sean
-------------How do I give Kudos? | How do I mark a post as Solved? --------------------------------------------------------

Can't install ITunes on Windows 2003 server (WHS box)

Hi,
I can't install the latest ITunes because it incorrectly mistakes my Windows 2003 server as Windows XP. So after search I find that I can change the MSI files as according to this thread: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2154140.
This seems to work for all MSI file sin the ITunes etup exe except for this: AppleMobileDeviceSupport.msi. If I change the MSI LaunchConditions it gives my error 2229 no matter what.
So I'm stuck. Should I call Apple next?

I can't help you with the error you get, but just to clarify while iTunes isn't "officially" supported for use on Server 2003, it does work. Sort of. iTunes 8 could be installed by editing the MSI, iTunes 9 however while this method is still required you'll run into a problem with iPodService.exe crashing, and iTunes refuses to finish the install until that service is up and running.
There are a few topics on here that detail what you can do to get around this problem. I believe currently the only tried and tested method is to use the iPodService.exe from iTunes 8, doing a swap trick when the iTunes 9 service crash occurs so that you can at least get the application to install.
I can't be bothered to go to the trouble though. I'm interested in seeing if Apple will silently stop with the BS and just fix the installer's version mismatch errors (easily done), and fix iPodService.exe. The reason why the service crashes, according to what I've read, is because it seemingly misidentifies Server 2003 and similar OS's as Vista or Windows 7, and then begins calling functions for those OSs from ntdll.dll - which causes the crash.
As for your error, presumably that is with Orca. All I could find relating to the errors is something about transforming the MSI and language translations. It could also be because of an older version of Orca. Perhaps try and re-download iTunes, and extract the MSI packages again. But you should only need to edit the LaunchCondition for AppleMobileDevice.msi - and you don't need to delete the table either, you can simply change the number in NTVersion from 501 to 502, save the package and it'll all work. It did for me when I first tried it anyway.

Installing 9i on windows 2003 server

i am trying to install oracle 9i on windows 2003 server, but i got an error message, like the following...
"There are no patches that need to be applied from the patch set Oracle 9iR2 Patch set 9.2.0.3.0."
i can't find a version(9.2.0.3) for windows 2003 server(32bit) on oracle download section. I think that windows 2003 server doesn't support the Oracle 8i(8.1.7), either.
can someone help me install Oracle 8i or 9i on windows 2003 server?
Thanks...

I'm not sure there is a supported version for your O/S but if there is you will find it by going to the downloads page at http://otn.oracle.com.
If there isn't I'd recommend going with a currently supported version of the product rather than one whose full support has ended.

Oracle 9i 32 bit ON Windows 2003 server 32 bit

Hi all
I have oracle 9i 32 bit istalled on HP server with windows 2003 server 32 bit, 8GB ram.
I am trying to increase oracle memory size (SGA + PGA),
but when I exceed 2GB for (SGA + PGA) it gives me error (ORA-27102 : out of memory)
Is it because the windows 32bit ?
How to manage this issue?

The maximum amount of memory that can be allocated on a Windows Server 2003 is 4 Gb.
If you have Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, it supports 32 GB of physical RAM and Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition supports 64 Gb by means of the Physical Address Extensions (PAE) feature.
You should declare the 3 Gb switch that is in the Boot.ini file with Microsoft Windows Server 2003 so it addresses more than 2Gb. So verify which windows 2003 server edition are you currently using.
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com

Is Windows 2003 Server supported as a server that MA can migrate?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for