Is windows 8.1 better than windows 7 for photoshop cc

Which windows is better to use for photoshop cc , 8.1 or 7

I made the transition from 7 to 8.1 about 6 months ago and can't say I've had any problems at all with PS CC.
If you are upgrading then I would say go for it. Are you upgrading the spec of your machine as well or do you already have a good set-up?

Similar Messages

Meego is better than Windows Phone

I think Meego is better than Windows Phone from certain point of view, at least the Name of Meego is nice than the Name of Windows Phone!

@Avenger_Osiris: As I have got the N9, I can already comment on that. I love the device. The buildquality is excellent, the screen is a pearl with vivid colours. The OS and UI is a new experience to me, but has so far been nothing but great. You adapt easily to how to navigate and the whole thing is so smooth.
There are of course lots of improvement needed, but I had no issues using it as my main device straight out of box. There are at least 2 updates coming as I know, and you also have the support from the community. It's a geeks device, but still easy enough for everyone to use.
Symbian is dying yes, but not as fast as we first thought. Even though the mess with Anna was a crazy mans circus, I still haven't heard anything saying that Nokia will stop the process with belle. Hopefully they will manage to get it out a bit quicker than with Anna.
I will comment on the lumia when I get it. That will also be a new experience to me - though I had a windows phone many years ago - motorola clam shell

Why SAP is better than Oracle for timber plantation industry

Dear Experts,
I have to prepare a ppt regarding Why SAP is better than Oracle for timber plantation industry? please supply me some precious points that could convince my client to go for SAP rather than Oracle.
I u have a ppt ready for this then please help me by sending that. Pleease help me asap.
Thank u all
Sankhajeet

Hi,
if anyone have any other docs or links on this...please send me...
Thanks in advance
krishna
[email protected]

Why does a DVI or VGA look better than HDMI for 2nd Monitor

Why does a DVI or VGA connection for a program monitor look better than HDMI. I've tested this on several systems with CS5x and CS6. The full screen output from premiere definitely looks worse with HDMI.
I can often see visual differences with the Windows GUI as well, over sharpening of text and lines, harsh rendering of gradients. It looks like a VGA signal displayed on a television.
I've looked at the NVidia stetting and it appears to be set to 1920x1080 at 60hz either way, DVI or HDMI. On one Acer 20 inch monitor the was VGA, HDMI, Composite, Component, and Digital Tuner, but no DVI. The program monitor has always looked blah from the HDMI. So I recently switched the connection to a DVI to VGA adaptor, and now the video looks so much better.
Any thoughts or explanations?

Just because the monitors accept a 1080P signal doesn't mean their native resolution is 1920x1080. At 20 inch they very likely can scale that signal down to the native resolution of the panel which may be 1600 x 900 or another resolution that is 16 x 9 resolution. That scaling can be done by the GPU or firmware on the Monitor depending on the video driver options and the firmware options. That scaling is also the most common cause to text and icon blurriness you are talking about. As an example there are Pro monitors that accept a 4K signal but scale it down to 2.5K or 2K on the actual panel. You might try going into your video card settings such as Nvidia control panel and look for the scaling options. Select GPU scaling and see if the preview is better. If that doesn't work select no scaling and see if it's better if the monitor firmware handles the scaling.
Eric
ADK

Is rank() really better than rownum for top-n-queries?

Several sources say that for Oracle databases rank() should be used instead of 'rownum <= n' for top-n-queries. But here we have an application, where we a lot of top-n queries are executed on a big table with several million rows and rank() has a quite bad performance. I get much better results when I use a query with rownum <= n but the programmer of the application doesn't want to change it in the software because of those articles about rank() and rownum. I wonder, whether it is possible, to find a better form of the rank()-query or an additional index, that gives me the same performance.
To explain my case I created the following example (if you try it, be aware that depending on the size of your dba_objects view you might need up to half a gig free space in your tablespace for this example).
create table big_objects
as
select
ascii(m.alpha)*100000+o.object_id object_id,
o.owner owner,
o.object_type,
m.alpha||'_'||o.object_name object_name,
sysdate-400+mod(100*object_id+99*ascii(m.alpha),365)+24/(o.object_id+ascii(m.alpha)) created,
o.status
from
(select distinct
upper(substr(object_name,1,1)) alpha
from
sys.dba_objects
where
upper(substr(object_name,1,1)) between 'A' and 'Z') m,
sys.dba_objects o
order by
object_name;
create index bigindex_1 on big_objects (owner, object_type, created);
analyze table big_objects compute statistics;
So my table looks a bit like dba_objects but with much more rows and I made a synthetic "created" date which is more similar to my real case, where top-n means a date selection of the newest records from a certain type.
Here is the size of the segments on an nearly empty 11gR2 database:
select segment_name, bytes, blocks from sys.dba_segments where segment_name like 'BIG%'
SEGMENT_NAME BYTES BLOCKS
BIGINDEX_1 75497472 9216
BIG_OBJECTS 142606336 17408
On my database the example table has approx. 1,9 Mio rows:
select count(*) from big_objects;
COUNT(*)
1884246
and some 1,4% of those rows have owner = 'SYS' and object_type = 'INDEX'
select
count(*)
from big_objects
where owner = 'SYS'
and object_type = 'INDEX';
COUNT(*)
25896
But I want to find only the 10 newest indexes for the owner SYS. I think the typical rank() approach would be:
select
owner,
object_type,
object_name,
object_id,
status,
created
from
( select
owner,
object_type,
object_name,
object_id,
status,
created,
rank() over (order by created desc) rnk
from
big_objects
where
owner = 'SYS'
and object_type = 'INDEX')
where rnk <= 10
order by created asc;
OWNER OBJECT_TYPE OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_ID STATUS CREATED
SYS INDEX B_COLLELEMIND 6600515 VALID 15.04.2010 19:05:55
SYS INDEX V_I_WRI$_OPTSTAT_IND_OBJ#_ST 8600466 VALID 15.04.2010 19:09:03
SYS INDEX G_I_RLS 7100375 VALID 15.04.2010 19:23:55
SYS INDEX V_I_DIR$SERVICE_UI 8600320 VALID 15.04.2010 19:31:33
SYS INDEX L_I_TSM_DST2$ 7600308 VALID 15.04.2010 19:36:26
SYS INDEX L_I_IDL_UB11 7600235 VALID 15.04.2010 19:57:34
SYS INDEX V_I_VIEWTRCOL1 8600174 VALID 15.04.2010 20:19:21
SYS INDEX L_I_TRIGGER2 7600162 VALID 15.04.2010 20:31:39
SYS INDEX L_I_NTAB1 7600089 VALID 15.04.2010 21:35:53
SYS INDEX B_I_SYN1 6600077 VALID 15.04.2010 22:08:07
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.22
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2911012437
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1427 | 188K| 1400 (1)| 00:00:17 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 1427 | 188K| 1400 (1)| 00:00:17 |
|* 2 | VIEW | | 1427 | 188K| 1399 (1)| 00:00:17 |
|* 3 | WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK | | 1427 | 79912 | 1399 (1)| 00:00:17 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BIG_OBJECTS | 1427 | 79912 | 1398 (0)| 00:00:17 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | BIGINDEX_1 | 1427 | | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("RNK"<=10)
3 - filter(RANK() OVER ( ORDER BY INTERNAL_FUNCTION("CREATED") DESC )<=10)
5 - access("OWNER"='SYS' AND "OBJECT_TYPE"='INDEX')
Statistics
1 recursive calls
0 db block gets
25870 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1281 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
524 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
2 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed
As from the index only the first two columns are used, all the 25896 records that I found above are read and sorted just to find the ten newest ones. Many unnecessary blocks are read and luckily all needed database blocks were in memory already. In our real case quite often a lot of physical reads are performed, which makes the performance of the application even worse.
In my following example with a "rownum <= 10" all three columns of the index are used and the number of block gets is much, much smaller than in the rank() example.
select
owner,
object_type,
object_name,
object_id,
status,
created
from
big_objects
where
(owner, object_type, created)
in
( select
owner,
object_type,
created
from
( select /*+ first_rows(10) */
owner,
object_type,
created
from
big_objects
where
owner = 'SYS'
and object_type = 'INDEX'
order by
owner,
object_type,
created desc
where rownum <= 10
order by created asc;
OWNER OBJECT_TYPE OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_ID STATUS CREATED
SYS INDEX B_COLLELEMIND 6600515 VALID 15.04.2010 19:05:55
SYS INDEX V_I_WRI$_OPTSTAT_IND_OBJ#_ST 8600466 VALID 15.04.2010 19:09:03
SYS INDEX G_I_RLS 7100375 VALID 15.04.2010 19:23:55
SYS INDEX V_I_DIR$SERVICE_UI 8600320 VALID 15.04.2010 19:31:33
SYS INDEX L_I_TSM_DST2$ 7600308 VALID 15.04.2010 19:36:26
SYS INDEX L_I_IDL_UB11 7600235 VALID 15.04.2010 19:57:34
SYS INDEX V_I_VIEWTRCOL1 8600174 VALID 15.04.2010 20:19:21
SYS INDEX L_I_TRIGGER2 7600162 VALID 15.04.2010 20:31:39
SYS INDEX L_I_NTAB1 7600089 VALID 15.04.2010 21:35:53
SYS INDEX B_I_SYN1 6600077 VALID 15.04.2010 22:08:07
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3360237620
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 10 | 760 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 10 | 760 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 10 | 760 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 10 | 200 | 2 (50)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | HASH UNIQUE | | 10 | 200 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | COUNT STOPKEY | | | | | |
| 7 | VIEW | | 11 | 220 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN DESCENDING| BIGINDEX_1 | 1427 | 28540 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | BIGINDEX_1 | 3 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BIG_OBJECTS | 3 | 168 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
6 - filter(ROWNUM<=10)
8 - access("OWNER"='SYS' AND "OBJECT_TYPE"='INDEX')
9 - access("OWNER"="OWNER" AND "OBJECT_TYPE"="OBJECT_TYPE" AND "CREATED"="CREATED")
Statistics
1 recursive calls
0 db block gets
26 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1281 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
524 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed
I made this comparison with the Oracle versions 10.2 and 11.2 and the result was more or less the same. How can I change the rank() query in a way that only the small number of really needed blocks are read from the database?

this was exactly the hint, I was looking for. Generally speaking hints are not the preferred way to go to tune queries. They can have nasty side-effects when data changes.
Now the rank()-query is similar fast and much better to read than my fast one with three nested SELECTs.
Your rownum query was needlessly complicated, and could be simplified to:
select owner, object_type, object_name, object_id, status, created
from (select owner, object_type, created
      from big_objects
      where owner = 'SYS' and
            object_type = 'INDEX'
      order by created desc)
where rownum <= 10
order by created ascand very likely get the same speed.
One more question. How did you format those sql queries and results. When I copy/paste them into the editor of forums.oracle.com the format allways gets lost.To preserve formatting use {noformat}{noformat} before and after the section you want ot keep formatted. In general, if you want to see how someone generated an effect, reply to the post and hit the quote original icon. You will see all the formatting codes used in the original.
John

CS4 better than CS3 for Leopard?

Hi,
I've been having some trouble with Adobe CS3 (especially Photoshop) on Apple OS X Leopard. Does anyone have experience with CS4 on this platform, and if so, is it better in terms of compatibility and/or memory management? Or is it just a bunch of new features? I would really like improved stability for my Adobe software.

"keep in mind that many of the people that have responded are not running Leopard so they are just repeating rumors they have heard on this forum." - that's not the case, I am running Leopard using CS4. Main issues are slightly carelessly put together compatability between the OS and the CS4 Application Frame, and windows. Otherwise everything is roughly Ok. There are some hard drive usage issues too, with Occasional crashes during heavy scratch activity - and these
may be Leopard related issues. I use CS4 about 80% of the time.
Check your graphics card is compatible as Jim said, although you can still use CS4 very well with Open GL turned off if you need.

Will Final Cut Express be any better than iMovie for colour resolution

Hi
I have just made the move from a Laptop/Windows to a Macbook Pro, whilst running on the Laptop i used Ulead Video Studio V10.5 to capture and edit DV movies from my Panasonic NV-GS180. Once I learnt the basic the output results were very good, eg. an mpeg movie file of around 2.5GB for an hour of video.
Since moving to the Mac I have uploaded 2 recent DV tapes into the standard iMovie application. I have done a simple upload with minimal editing just to prove the quality of the output. I have output into H.264 format and the resultant file is around 2.5GB for an hour. The quality of the video is very poor compared to the equivalent on the VS10.5. Now, so by "poor quality" i mean the colour resolution is literally rubbish, on VS10.5 there are many different shades of the same colour, whereas in iMovie there is literally two. The resolution also looks worse, but I have read that iMovie doesn't handle the original interlaced video from my camcorder. So, I am more than willing to but Final Cut Express if my two problems with iMovie are addressed to achieve the same quality as VS10.5 on my old windows XP Laptop. There's no Trial like there is with Aperture, which I have recently bought to improve on the original installed iPhoto.
Any help, advice or comments gratefully received.

hi Ian
In store, we were using an huge Mac, whereas I am using a Macbook Pro. I must admit I did not try iMovie in the store to check the quality was equally as bad. But I can confirm that since installing FCE4 on my Macbook Pro at home and capturing the same piece of video that the colour resolution is the same as in store, so all is good.
Cheers
Gary

Windows Touch Screen Stylus Pen use for Photoshop

I was have Windows touch screen and I want to use a styles pen. However, when I try to use the pen it will not draw, but just move the picture around. How can I fix this? Thank you

[Apologies for the multiple versions, but I also raised this issue in another part of the forum where there's an active Helix discussion, so there's another conversation happening in the thread "When is the Helix release date?", around page 59]
For those experiencing this problem, I'm becoming convinced that it's mostly going to occur in OneNote. Here is a "solution" I'm testing; it's not a proper fix but it works.
OneNote has the ability to automatically detect whether or not you're using your finger to pan, your pen nib to write, or your pen eraser (if you have one) to erase. It's controlled by a setting under File-Options, Advanced. Look for the Pen settings. You'll see "Automatically switch between inking, selecting, typing and panning." It's checked by default. If you uncheck it, then your eraser won't work anymore, and you have to manually switch between inking, erasing and panning; to make this easy I dropped those icons into my quick access bar.
I think this is a Helix problem, not a OneNote problem. On my Dell Latitude 10 tablet, I do not have this problem. There's something about the Helix sensors and/or drivers that isn't working quite right, so it can't consistently figure out what's up with the pen, and it gets stuck.

Is apple TV better than Roku for Netflix?

Trying to buy one system to play movies with Netflix, and just got Roku. I was ondering if Apple TV does what Roku does better and then more (iTunes, etc)
Anybody has a recommendation about this?

With ATV you have access to iTunes rentals and TV shows purchases, Netflix, Youtube, Vimeo, Podcasts, Flickr, iTunes Match, some sports etc.
http://www.apple.com/appletv/
If you have an IOS device then you can use airplay or mirror (via iPad 2, iPhone 4S) for additional content.

Which computer would it be better to buy for photoshop cc - the newest mac mini or the mac pro?

i think 16 mb of ram is essential, but other than that, is there a reason to spend more for the mac pro?

CPU, Graphics card, and disk speed also impact performance. Details that may help you are in this article (which is applicable to CC): How to tune Photoshop CS6 for peak performance

HT4759 Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?

chewy cabeza wrote:
Why did apple support Windows better than Mac in iCloud?
From your point of view and the framing of your question, Apple does indeed support WIndows better than Mac for the limited issue of iCloud.
chewy cabeza wrote:
...YET, Leopard and Snow Leopard are NOT iCloud compatible. How can that be justified? Obviously, Apple can make iCloud available to Snow Leopard, but disdains us...
Historically speaking, Apple has rarely gone backwards in its OS development. Once they have released a new OS with new technology, I can only think of one example of when they backtracked: They released TrueType technology in System 7 and then released System 6.0.8, which included TrueType technology for continuing System 6 users.
So it is part of their culture to move forward and not backwards. Other examples:
• Inclusion of the then novel SONY 3.5" disk drive in its release of the first Macintosh (and not the industry standard 5.25" drive); after its use in the Lisa and adoption for the Apple II series of computers.
• Elimination of the floppy drive completely in the release of the first iMac.
• Use of then novel AAC audio compression as "state of the art" compression for the iPod release in 2001 instead of the outdated mp3 standard.
• Refusal to allow use of FLASH in iPod Touch/iPhone/iPads.
How could they justify these decisions? The marketplace justified them for Apple!
So, yes, they could release 10.6.9 with iCloud support. But why now, if not then?

Better than expected

I'd read all the review and watched all the videos and thats what made me buy the IPhone even though I'd just upgraded my old phone on T-mobile to a Nokia 6300.
One of the reasons for the change was that I do access the WWW, email etc and my last T-mobile bill was £120+ mostly made up of data transfer costs.
With the 02 unlimited data download, the IPhone will pay for itself in a couple of months and I have to say I am extremely impressed so far even though I've only been activated a few days.
I assumed there were bound to be some teething problems with such a jump in technology, but everything I have tried to do with the IPhone has worked and passed the test with flying colours.
Kudos also to you guys on this forum for all your help. I've read quite a few of the posts and you do a great job in providing help where needed.

You find it amazingly faster. Honestly, I just don't see it. It doesn't matter as I'm just I've gotten to on to what I really see as their architecture for future development and progress. I also gather their implementation of 64 bit is way better than Windows 7 for some reason.
At this point in time, my computer is plenty fast with Leopard or Snow Leopard. Its just a couple of pieces of software that's the problem vexxing me and other users - Entourage 2008 and the problem with Apple's sync services (I see Apple implemented a diagnostics capability in Snow Leopard to assist with sync issues) and Intuit with Quicken still being stuck at 2007 and PowerPC. I had to install Rosetta for Quicken 2007 only and honestly from what I've seen of Intuit's Quicken beta, if the next beta (due in a couple weeks) isn't a major step in the right direction as they're going for release in Feb 2010 I might be with Quicken 2007 for quite a while. These two things are the unfortunate thing for me at the moment.

Better Graphics Card for Mac Pro !!

Hi,
I planning to upgrade my Mac with the latest Mac Pro .. so I'd like just to know ..
Which is the better performance can I get it for 3D Graphics redraw .. and Open CL feature:
A Mac Pro, have (One) NVIDIA EVGA GeForce GTX 285 1GB GDDR3 memory (Here is the Card info )
Or Mac Pro, have (3x) NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB (Here is the Card info )
Or anyone can advice me another graphics card better than above for Mac Pro ?
(Except the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800)
Thanks in Advance.

Two choices, either ATI 4870 can be bought as BTO for $200, or buy with GT120 and add GTX 285 $449 afterwards (not offered as BTO configuration at reduced price).
ATI seems favored by OS X and Apple applications but has to catch up in some areas, you know, like behind on OpenCL which will take time and work really (and Nvidia with CUDA, GPGPU and Physx has a leg up).
Or, sit on pins and needles and hope ATI 5870 or GTX 480 (bit, power guzzeler).
Apple likes to have basic card that doesn't need aux power so has to work @ 75W, and only has two 6-pin, the Fermi cards have 6 and 8-pin, unless revised models of Mac Pro have more options.
Run Windows, the GTX shines.
There has never been support for SLI, and recently even CFX was disabled as well.
Photos of the 480:
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2010/03/04/first-photos-of-the-geforce-gtx-480
Specs:
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2010/03/03/first-information-about-geforce-gtx-480
And 1.5GB RAM... http://techreport.com/discussions.x/18556

LabVIEW better than VB?

HI,
Our customer requested that a motion system should be constructed with VB and Omron hardware. Fortunately they accepted LabVIEW and NI-hardware due to the fact we said this would result in a shorter delivery time (because I have not used VB for large apps before). They are considering re-writing the application in VB after delivery, so that the in-house programmer can further develop the system.
The system is quite complex - it involves 10-axis of motion to control and parallel software loops. The question I am asked again and again - "Why is LabVIEW better than VB for this?". Unfortunately after much investigation this seems hard to summarise. I have read all the previous posts but there does not seem to be any argument to convince that LabVIEW is the better solution here. I'm looking for a sentence or two that goes some way to convincing people LabVIEW is the better solution - any ideas?
Martin
Certified LabVIEW Architect

Martin.D wrote:
> HI,<br><br>Our customer requested that a motion system should be
> constructed with VB and Omron hardware. Fortunately they accepted
> LabVIEW and NI-hardware due to the fact we said this would result in
> a shorter delivery time (because I have not used VB for large apps before).
> They are considering re-writing the application in VB after delivery,
> so that the in-house programmer can further develop the system.
> The system is quite complex - it involves 10-axis of motion to control
> and parallel software loops. The question I am asked again and again -
> "Why is LabVIEW better than VB for this?". Unfortunately after much
> investigation this seems hard to summarise. I have read all the previous
> posts but there does not seem to be any argument to convince that LabVIEW
> is the better solution here. I'm looking for a sentence or two that goes
> some way to convincing people LabVIEW is the better solution - any ideas?
Mostly it depends with what you are familiar with. I couldn't write
almost any real app in Visual Basic and deliver it in a reasonable time.
There are people who claim they can do anything in Visual Basic in a
short time, but for me I simply miss the overview over what methods do
what and when in VB.
Why do they want to consider to rewrite the whole app? That is a major
undertaking and really only justified if they are not happy with what
they have now and consider redoing it anyhow, and/or don't feel you
would be available in the future for timely maintenance work. as such it
seems more a management and communication problem to me than what
software really is better.
Rolf Kalbermatter
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

Better Display Driver under Windows 8 than Windows 7 for MacBook Pro Retina?

Anyone happen to know if the display support for a MacBook Pro Retina is better under Windows 8 than it is under Windows 7?
Ideally, I would like to be able to run 2880x1800 at True Color as well as have the HDMI out fuction as a second display (maching the behaviour while booted under Max OS X 10.8).
Under Windows 7, the highest resolution that supports True Color is 1600x1200. This would be okay if that setting did not distort the picture (everything is slightly squeezed). At 2880x1800, the highest color depth is High Color (16-bit) which is, well, not something one can actually use if doing graphics work. On my 27" iMac, 2680x1600 supports True Color as expected.
Also under Windows 7, the display connected via HDMI is not recognized.
I've contected both Apple care support and Microsoft support about this, but Apple referred me to Microsoft and Microsoft referrred me back to Apple.
Thanks,
Warren
P.S. Personally, I think it's rediculous to even attempt to do graphics work under Windows, but tell that to the Windwows based corporate world that I freelance in.

Yes, there is a better display driver for the MacBook Pro Retina while running Windows 7 Pro.
And, the answer is so obvious, that I feel a little silly having started this thread in the first place!
The Windows 7 Professional NVIDIA drivers for the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M card need to be installed manually by downloading them from NVIDIA directly.
If you need to do this on your MBPr Boot Camp volume, use this link:
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us
Then, set the pop-up menus based on your MBPr. [Mine were as follows: GeForce; GeForce 600M Series (Notbooks); GeForce GT 650M; Windows 7 64-bit: English (US)]
What tipped me off to this is that the CUDA drivers need to be downloaded manually on the Mac OS X side to take full advantage of raytracing in Adobe After Effects CS6 and CC. As soon as I started to run that installer it dawned on me, "Hey, you probably need to install the drivers on the Boot Camp side as well." And sure enough after doing so, I am able select all of the expected resolutions as well as run 2880 x 1800 at Millions of Colors (32-bit).
I guess I'm showing my nearly three decades worth of being a Mac user where I'm accustomed to having about everything needed included with the OS.
-Warren

Is windows 8.1 better than windows 7 for photoshop cc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for