Is working in 4:3 Aspect Ratio going the way of the dinosaur?

It seems to me that all the new flat screen TVs being sold are designed for 16:9 Aspect Ratio. (I know they can play 4:3, but that requires the user to push extra buttons to set that up.) Therefore, am I correct in thinking that it makes little sense to continue to shoot footage and edit in FCE in 4:3 ?
If so, can previously 4:3 DV be converted to 16:9 within FCE? (How?)
Thanks much, Bob

Over time, yes, I believe 4:3 is headed out. It's clear that the manufacturers are all pushing 16:9 in their product lines. How else will they maintain their revenue stream into the future? People don't go out and buy a new TV just for the heck of it. TVs were a very mature market until 16:9 format came along and breathed new life into it. The format change is certainly a more compelling reason to buy than just getting a bigger screen. And the industry has effectively lobbied the FCC to help them push sales via the switch to DTV in February. There is a lot of advertising going on and a lot of people will decide they should just buy a new TV for Christmas this year because of the switchover coming in Feb.
However, I do think the transition will take a very long time. Years. There are still millions of 4:3 TVs in use and they work perfectly fine and a lot of owners are not going to switch until their TV gives up the ghost.
I've not made the move to 16:9. The reason is the cost of going there. New camera, new TV/monitors, and they're not cheap. At least not if you want something better than middling. None of my customers or friends are banging down the doors to have me do 16:9 instead of 4:3.
My 2 cents ...

Similar Messages

Using Win 10 there is a need for an app to determine the full device display area and aspect ratio programitically; the dimensions are needed to create full-screen bitmap.

While Windows.Current.Bounds returns the application windows size, in order to create a full-screen bitmap my app would need to retrieve the full display area of the device. I cannot even get the aspect ratio.
Pre-Win10, using Windows.Current.Bounds I can create a bitmap of whatever size application window the user is seeing. When the user is showing my app at full screen, I can therefore get the full display area and aspect ratio of the device and create a full-screen
bitmap.
With Win10, the user would need to know to hide the taskbar and also display at full-screen before an app can retrieve the display area and aspect ratio using Windows.Current.Bounds.
Before Win10 it's obvious to the user that full-screen is or is not being used. When I create the bitmap, I create it to fit the application window. When the app is displayed full screen, the bitmap will be full screen. Also, the app starts full-screen so
I can detect the display area at startup if I need to.
With Win10, to the user the app "looks like" it is full screen with the taskbar displayed even though it's not really full screen.
I believe that in Win10 determining the full display area will be useful and not just retrieving the application window size.
musical9

Rob, Is this forum best way to get my suggestion to the development team?
Before Win10 it's obvious to the user that full-screen is or is not being used. When I create the bitmap, I create it to fit the application window. When the app is displayed full screen, the bitmap will be full screen. Also, the app starts full-screen
so I can detect the display area at startup if I need to.
With Win10, to the user the app "looks like" it is full screen with the taskbar displayed even though it's not really full screen.
Yes, Windows.Current.Bounds does work the same, but I believe that in Win10 determining the full display area will be useful and not just the application window.
musical9

How can i export a series of images in different aspect ratios to the same height

How can i export a series of images in different aspect ratios to the same height?
I wish to make a slider callery for my website. all the images need to be 750 Pixels high, the width does not matter. I have a mixture of square pandscap and protraite images can i do thing as one export or do i have to do it twice? Once for long edge and once for shot edge?
Thanks

Yes, you can but there is a trick to it.
In the Export Dialog under <Image Sizing> select Widdth & Height.
Then enter 750 pixels for Height.
Put your cursor into the Width field behind all the numbers that appear there and with the backspace key delete the numbers. If you enter "0" it will not accept that. But it accepts when you just delete the field for Width with the backspace key. The Width field will now be just blank.
When you then export all image will have a height of 750 pixels and the width will fall variously according to thne height / width ratio.
Or alternatively you can enter 7.5" for height at a resolution of 100 ppi.

CS6 Camera Raw - I can now only crop using aspect ratio in the custom crop setting rather than being able to set the dims in cm and inches? anyone know how to revert? ever since installing new mac operating system things have been strange!

CS6 Camera Raw - I can now only crop using aspect ratio in the custom crop setting rather than being able to set the dims in cm and inches? anyone know how to revert? ever since installing new mac operating system things have been strange!

Hi Kglad.
I have looked at all of my settings both in Bridge and CS6 Photoshop regarding Camera Raw. I am at a loss how to set the crop tool in cm or inches as I once did - now the only option is to crop using ratios of 1:1 etc etc - This is infuriating as lots of my square crops I could set at 10" x 10'' specifically to print one to one to fit frame and mount size -
Now if cropping using bloody aspect ratio of 1:1 (square) the actual dims of the crop are roughly 4.25 inches x 4.25 inches. this means I then have to open the whole image in photoshop in order to crop at the dims I have set! It was so much quicker in terms of batch cropping in camera raw being able to set dims in centimetres and inches but they have gone and mucked around with it, with the new bloody update! Unless you are an absolute genius and know how I can go back to having an option of CM, Inches and aspect ratio within the custom crop settings? (Please say you do)
here is the new tutorial for CC - my guess is they have scrapped the control we had over the custom crop settings
Cropping Images In Adobe Camera Raw 8

What aspect ratio is the 15'' macbook pro retina 2013 model?

Hello. Can someone please tell me what the aspect ratio of the 2013 Macbook Pro retina 15inch is? Is it 16:10 or 16:9

Glad to have helped in some way. I'm a college student that is on this website because I am a huge apple fan, have good knowledge of apple products, and enjoy helping others.
I'm sorry you had an encounter with a rude person. I promise you most people on here are not like that. These are support forums for getting help with your apple products. This is the right place for you to ask questions and get help concercing them. You will find that most on people are helpful and kind.
Your question was in no way stupid and deserved a nice response. I have a grandpa who is 90 years old and he tends to ask questions that can be considered stupid such as "how do i close this window" or "how do i find the internet browser" but none of us ever ridicule him on it we are all just happy he can use the computer at his age.

How to get the aspect ratio follow the mouse?

Hi! I'm just wondering, is there a way to have the aspect
ratio follow the mouse?
Cause I'm trying to implement Adobe Capture-videos to a
phpbb-based forum and therefore, the videos can't be any bigger
than standard youtube-videos. So I need to have the aspect ratio be
fixed and about 448x337 pixels. And when i want the mouse centered
in the video and have everything around follow the mouse.
Is there a way to do this? Or do I just have to create a link
in the forum to a new browser-window?

Hi Kenny Bones and welcome to our community
Unfortunately there is no way to automatically have this
occur. With Captivate, you simply define a recording region of the
screen and grab whatever happens inside that region. I suppose one
way you *might* accomplish it would be by manually recording. In
this case, you press the Print Screen key each time you desire a
screen grab. But for what you are talking about, it would require
toggling on and off the full motion recording. (FMR) Turn on FMR,
move the window, turn off FMR, etc.
This sounds like something you might wish to suggest to the
development team. You may do this by
clicking
here and completing the form.
Cheers... Rick

I have a project in FCP that is a 2:1 aspect ratio. When I send to compressor to author a DVD I lose the aspect ratio and the image fills the 16x9 frame. How do I preserve the original ratio thru compressor?

Aspect ratio lost in compressor

Hi Tom, thanks so much for answering. I totally get the need to letterbox but my issue is, how do I get the best quality in letterbox format?
Should I export it thru QT Conversion or just Export to Quicktime Movie? I exported as a self contained movie to keep the quality but when I send it thru the MPEG-2 compressor for DVD it fills the 16x9 frame without letterbox.
How would I modify the MPEG-2 preset to give me the letterbox in the MPEG-2?
I've been playing around but haven't hit the jackpot yet.
If there's any info you have, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks so much
James

Can I change the aspect ratio of the storyboard template in Pages to 16x9?

Every time I try to drag a side of the storyboard panel it keeps the aspect ratio constrained to 4:3. I'd like to make it more rectangular to fit my 16x9 storyboards. Suggestions?

Jason,
With object(s) Selected, open an instance of the Metrics Inspector and deselect "Constrain Proportions".
Regards,
Jerry

Working with two aspect ratios on the same project?

Hello fellow FCE HDers!
I am currentley editing a project that has both 16:9 and 4:3 and would like to be able to use both. Can this be done without streching and shrinking the shots? Is there a happy medium.
Thanks G

Sometimes. You have to decide whether you want the widescreen material letterboxed, or the 4:3 material pillarboxed. Or do a lot of scaling that will soften the image.

What is the aspect ratio of the panoramic photos in iOS 6?

I'm trying to figure out at what sizes I can print these panoramic photos. With the full 240 degree panoramic shot, what is the aspec ratio? Any help?

aprildesigns wrote:
I'm trying to figure out at what sizes I can print these panoramic photos. With the full 240 degree panoramic shot, what is the aspec ratio? Any help?
There is no set aspect ration. It depends how big the photo is.

Aspect ratio for the 3D can mesh in CS6

Hello,
I am creating a 3D can that I want to place a label design on. When I open up the mesh (diffuse texture) and place my label design on it, it does not fit proplely, it is flipping it and scaling it. I have use the UV propeties to scale it but it is doing only a so-so job. Does anyone know how to make this work easily?
Thanks in advance!

I will attach (ZIP file) the CS5 Soda can here, I hope this helps until we correct that UV issue in the CS6 can.
If you want it to appear in the Mesh Preset menu you need to copy the CS5_soda.dae here:
C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Presets\Meshes
On the Mac Applications | Adobe | Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit) | Presets | Meshes
When you add it will be here in the 3D menu > New Mesh from layer > Mesh Preset >

Working with several video formats aspect ratios need help...

Hi folks I have searched around quite a bit but I need more specific advice based my situation...I am editing a docu about Japanese biker gangs shot on several different SD cameras:
MY FOOTAGE
1.Sony Vx-2000 fitted with a Century Optics 16:9 converter lens bayonet mounted
2.Canon Xl2 shot in 16:9 mode
But I also have:
ARCHIVAL/ACQUIRED FOOTAGE
1. Contributor's camera SD 4:3 aspect ratio
2.Contributor's camera SD 16:9 aspect ratio
3. Transferred from VHS into SD 4:3 aspect ratio
I would like to standardize the aspect ratio for the project but I am getting confused as sometimes the footage shot on the sony (which should be true 16:9) appears elongated vertically at times.
Are my settings off?
Also, I have "title safe" wireframe on in the Canvas and the images all exceed the outer box. I don't have a TV so it's hard to check what (if anything) gets
lost. I guees most TVs can handle 16:9 without letterboxing....
Do I have to worry about that? Which box should I crop to if I letterbox? The out or inner? Or the outside of the screen? Should I just letterbox the whole project?
BTW eventually I am planning on Uprezing the project to HD using Magic Bullet when outputting.
The overall question is: Who has experience dealing with multiple aspect ratios in one timeline? Can you offer any advice on a work flow to output successfully?

Sorry to butt in, haven't read the entire thread.
Suggest you plan from the beginning to create one timeline but encode for two separate output formats.
Standard procedure for bringing multiple formats is to convert them to a single format as they are ingested. Decide early what the timeline format will be and transcode everything to that codec before anything is brought into the timeline.
When your project goesgolden, export a single self-contained movie and take that to Compressor to create release movies that will be played on Blu-ray, SD DVD, online, or in Power Point, whatever you need.
bogiesan
Message was edited by: David Bogie Chq-1

Defined crop aspect ratios work only in landscape mode (LR2.1) (Mac, Win)

When I try to use pre-defined or user-defined crop aspect ratios, e.g., 5x7, on a picture in portrait mode, the crop always goes into landscape mode. This makes no sense; PS doesn't do that.
As an interim solution I have been rotating my portrait pictures 90 degrees into landscape orientation just to get the cropping done, and then rotating them back to portrait, but my neck is beginning to hurt. What is the correct method for cropping in portrait mode using pre-defined aspect ratios?

The method I use is to set the ratio, then do not drag from the corner; plop the crop tool inside the edges and draw as you would in PS. Then adjust via edges, corners, etc.

Interpretation rules not working; can't change pixel aspect ratio

Hi,
I'm following the instructions on the Adobe help site here...
http://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/aspect-ratios.html
...so that I may use custom pixel aspect ratios in the interpret footage dialog box.
Unfortunately none of my changes to this file have any effect, and I'm clueless. These are cinemaDNG sequences and I'd like to keep working with them raw, otherwise I would take the time to export them and stretch them en masse through AE.

Hi Kevin, a mix of BMPCC and 5Dmk3 Magic Lantern. ML raw at 60p has a non-standard PAR, most of my footage is shot in this format. I need 0.65, the closest is 0.9091. I was disappointed at first to find no ability to manually enter the value, then elated to find the Interpretation rules text file, then disappointed again to find it doesn't work...hoping this ends well!

What is the difference between Aspect Ratios?

Hello. I couldn't find any specific documentation regarding this.
I am working on an iPhoto 09 slideshow project using the scrapbook theme. I am planning to export the slideshow as a movie (it looks like the default export is mpeg 4 but I could also export as a quicktime .mov) and then move to iDVD to burn on a DVD. Ultimately, I need to show it on a projector using a DVD player. I'm not sure what the projector's resolution is but I assume 16:9 will be the best aspect ratio for the highest quality.
In the slideshow settings, there are 4 different aspect ratios:
1) This Screen (16:9)
2) HDTV (16:9)
3) TV (4:3)
4) iPhone (3:2)
What is the difference between This Screen (1) and HDTV (1)? Does it matter? Any other suggestions?
Thanks.

Terence Devlin wrote:
Aspect ratio is the ratio of the width to the height of the image - in other words it's about shape. So both the 'This Screen' and the 'HDTV' settings will be the same Aspect Ratio.
The Aspect Ratio has no bearing on the quality, only the shape of the final images.
TD is absolutely correct here. The aspect ratio is only the shape of the image, not the quality. Basically, you need to decide if you are designing the show for viewing on a HD tv (16:9 or widescreen) or a SD tv (4:3 or squarish). A couple of years ago this choice was easy since most tv's out there were still 4:3, but today, the opposite is true. The popular choice now would be 16:9.
The biggest problem you will have with the quality of your slideshow is the
fact that you're burning it to DVD.
Your slideshow will be heavily compressed to fit the DVD spec of 640 x 480
pixels and this can lead to soft images or even blurry ones.
I think we're getting "compression" and "resolution" confused here a bit, or at the very least, we're using the wrong terminology.
For everyone's benefit, let me try to explain...
If you show an image that is native 640x480 on a screen that is native 640x480 (standard def tv screen), the image will look just fine. This is resolution and will not effect quality as long as you don't try to view at a higher resolution than the image actually is.
(If you try to view a 640x480 slide show in full screen mode on your computer monitor which is running at 1280x1024, the image will look horrible.)
Trying to view a higher rez image (ie: 3200x2400) on a lower resolution (ie 640x480 or SD tv) screen will reap NO benefit in quality. Remember that a SD TV will only show 640x480 (or 720x480) and no higher, so there is no benefit in trying to cram more pixels into an image than the screen can actually show.
Of course this all changes if you're going to view it on today's HiDef tvs, but even on them, the resolution tops at at 1920x1080. Once again, using a very high def image (ie: 3840x2160) will reap NO benefit since the resolution of the screen it's being viewed on tops out at 1920x1080. The aspect ratio on this type of tv is now 16:9 so the images shape will be wider than a normal tv (4:3).
Compression is the scheme used to compress an image to reduce it's file size, thus reducing it's quality. JPEG is a common form of image compression, and the amount of compression can be adjusted..the more compression, the more degradation of quality. This has nothing to do with resolution.
Depending on how you're going to process (iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD), the program will reduce the resolution of the original image to the resolution of you output. In other words, don't worry about doing any kind of resolution change prior to creating the dvd, as the program you choose to use will simply lower the resolution (this is not compression) to fit the output you choose.
Message was edited by: Rufus
Message was edited by: Rufus
Message was edited by: Rufus

Is working in 4:3 Aspect Ratio going the way of the dinosaur?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for