ISA-570 5 ports programmable?

We bought the ISA-570 for the same reason. On the literature it says that 5 ports are programmable for WAN ports but I can not find any configuration help or documentation on how to configure these ports. We are already using WAN1 and WAN2 but want to program the programmable ports for additional wans. Each time I have submitted a help ticket, I get no help on this or explanation. Can you point me to some configuration information on how to accomplish this?
Thank you

Hi Marc, that is an excellent question, I will be more than glad to answer it, in order to configure your physical ports, after you click the Edit (pencil) icon on the Networking > Ports > Physical Interface page, use the Ethernet Configuration - Add/Edit page to enable or disable the selected physical port, in the section “Port Type”, you can choose the type of the physical port, such as WAN, LAN, or DMZ. I hope this answer help you.
***Please mark the question as Answered or rate it so other users can benefit from it"***
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco Network Support Engineer.

Similar Messages

  • ISA-570 DMZ configuration?

    Our configuration is a little tricky, but certainly not uncommon.  Our ISP provides a single static WAN IP x.x.x.162/30 (gateway is x.x.x.161), then has provisioned 2 ranges of public IP's in different subnets.  One is y.y.y.112/29 and the other is z.z.z.32/28.   We use the "z" range for our DMZ and when we lease office space to a tenant they get the "y" range.
    We have been using an RV082 in "router mode" as the first inside device, some firewall rules here to protect our servers/device in the DMZ ranges.  Then a 2nd RV082 between that and our LAN running in "gateway mode" to provide traditional NAT & firewall for the private network.
    Recently, we increased the speed of our ISP fiber to 100M.  The RV082's don't really have the processing power to keep up with this, so we are trying to replace them with a more capable device.  The ISA-570 was recommended as it is rated to perform at or above 100M for VPN and Stateful firewall.
    The ISA-570 appears to have the capability to do advanced routing functions, so it would seem there should be a way to combine our two RV's into one ISA.  The ISA has a "routing mode" that you toggle on or off.  When routing mode is ON it disables all NAT functions, so that won't work.  I need to configure this with routing mode OFF, but figure out how to put in custom Routing or NAT rules since our Public IP ranges are in different subnets from our primary WAN IP.  We have tried many config options with no success.
    I'll see if I can diagram this as quickly as possible...
    WAN port - IP x.x.x.162/30   (gateway x.x.x.161 - Centurylink's device)
    DMZ1 - z.z.z.32/28  (port 9 configured with IP of z.z.z.33)
    DMZ2 - don't worry about this for now - if we get one working we can get both working
    No matter what I try, the DMZ range either gets NAT'ed through the WAN IP, or loses internet connection.
    Is there a way to do this with this device?  (My residential U-verse router can do this)  Is there another device that will allow me to function as a router and gateway at the same time?  I have tried static routing rules, RIP.... got desperate and tinkered with static/advanced NAT, Dynamic PAT, etc, but I don't really have any training in routing protocols and syntax, so I'm a little lost there.
    ** The only thing we haven't tried is setting the DMZ as a private range and configuring static NAT.  Reprogramming all the DMZ NIC's of the servers is something I'd like to avoid.  Furthermore, this really turns it into just another private LAN subnet which could be handled as a VLAN, so then what is the purpose of having so-called "DMZ" as a special classification in the ISA's config?   More confusing is the ISA-570 will program for multiple DMZ ranges, so there must be something we're missing...  If not, then it's like having a rack full of new servers and only one free port on the switch.

    Good morning
    Thanks for using our forum
    My name is Johnnatan and I am part of the Small business Support community. I apologife for the problems you are having, as your Cisco partner contact said, you are looking for a enterprise device, like the ASA. If you use your ISA as “gateway” it disables the “router” mode features and viceversa. I hope you find this answer useful,
    *Please mark the question as Answered or rate it so other users can benefit from it"
    Greetings,
    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • Access Site to Site from SSL VPN. ISA 570 & ASA 5505

    I have an Site to Site network between my ISA 570 and my ASA 5505.
    On the ISA 570 side I have the network 192.168.0.0/24 and remote users that are connecting via AnyConnect are in the 192.168.190.0/24
    On the ASA 5505 side I have the netowrk 192.168.200.0/24
    The Site to Site is working properly i can reach the networks from both sides.
    But when I am connected via AnyConnect to the ISA firewall I will also access the 192.168.200.0/24 network on the ASA side.
    I have made an firewall (in the ISA 570) rule that are allowing traffic from SSLVPN to VPN, but I need to nat the traffic from the 192.168.190.0/24 to 192.168.200.0/24 otherwise the ASA are blocking the traffic. I can solve the problem in the ASA but i want to solve it in the ISA 570.

    I have solved my problem.
    Just added an Advanced NAT.
    From: Any (this will be changed to proper network later)
    To: Any (this will be changed to proper network later)
    Original Source Adress: Any (this will be changed to proper network later)
    Original Destination Adress: Site_B (192.168.200.0/24)
    Original services: Any
    Translated source adress: IP of my ISA 570 (192.168.0.1)
    Translated destination adress: Site_B (192.168.200.0/24)
    Translated services: Any

  • I have isa-570 i had wan1 configured but when i want to ping it from outsied my campus it does not pings how to do that

    I have isa-570  i had wan1 configured with static ip but when i want to ping it from outside my campus it does not pings  how to do that

    In the ISA550, the setting is under Firewall - Attack Protection - Block Ping WAN Interface. Unchecked it should respond to a ping.

  • ISA 570 utm log view

    Hi,
    I configured ISA 570 Web URL Filtering policy assigned to Zone , its working and blocking the website as per confiuration ,
    but i am not able view the detail log , which website it blocked and visted by which user.Please help to do the same.
    Thanks
    kunal

    Hello Kunalmausam83,
    Have you tried setting the Log Facilities on the device? You can control what type of logs are sent where. For instance, you can choose to have the Web URL Filtering logs be sent to an email, remote log, or the local log.
    Here is an article that shows you how you can do this:
    Log Facilities on ISA500 Series Integrated Security Appliances
    I hope this helps!

  • ISA 570 , HTTPS Web Filtering not work

    We just replace the new ISA 570, we enable the Web URL Filtering and config the speific web site is block to access.
    We confirm Security Services > Web URL Filtering > Advanced Settings 80 and 443 is on filtering.
    We test the http 80 is block the speific website but the same web site use https can bypass the URL fultering and access success.
    How come?

    Hi, I think below two links, may be help for you
    Refer to:
    http://cdetsweb-prd.cisco.com/apps/dumpcr?identifier=CSCuf81910&parentprogram=QDDTS
    http://www-tac.cisco.com/Teams/ks/c3/xmlkwery.php?srId=625197659
    From: [email protected]
    Subject: SR 625197659 - ESC- ISA550-BUN1-K9 - Web URL Filtering //URLs are opening with https
    See detail note for email text
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: SR 625197659 - ESC- ISA550-BUN1-K9 - Web URL Filtering //URLs are opening with https
    Hello Team,
    I do have a ISA500 case open on our queue regarding HTTPS URL filtering and I remember one of you mentioning about the problem last week.
    I was able to replicate the issue customer is experiencing with https://www.youtube.com.
    Do you have any updates we can provide to our customers?
    Thank you,
    Marcelo
    (1h) 2013-03-20 22:06 GMT+000 JTSAO : Email InChange Note Status Edit as New
    From: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: SR 625197659 - ESC- ISA550-BUN1-K9 - Web URL Filtering //URLs are opening with https
    See detail note for email text
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected],[email protected]
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: SR 625197659 - ESC- ISA550-BUN1-K9 - Web URL Filtering //URLs are opening with https
    Hi Marcelo,
    There is a limitation in our HTTPS support. ISA500 may already have certificate before you configure to allow https://www.youtube.com . You need to wait for the certificate to time out before it is allowed. If you still have it configured to allow. Please check again if it works now. I am able to block facebok with HTTPS.
    Regards,
    Jeff
    From: Marcelo Demello (mamello)
    Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:14 PM
    To: isa500-tiger-team(mailer list)
    Cc: email-in(mailer list)
    - Toggle view for this email - - Expand ALL emails -

  • Vpn site to site isa 570 to asa 5505 multiple local lan

    Hello, i have configured a site to site vpn with a asa 5505
    In the tunnel will pass the network 172.x.x.x/16 and 192.168.x.x/24 from local isa to a single lan 192.168.x.x/24 on remote asa
    I have create a group network address and i put the the default_lan and the other lan in it
    In the tunnell configuration i have use this group address with local lan parameter
    When the tunnel was up in the routing table i view the remote lan on interface ipsec0 but also i view the local lan on  interface ipsec0  
    Is this configuration n ot supported?
    Thank best regards             

    Hello, thank for answer.
    The problem is that tha second lan is a routing static lan.
    The ip address of ISA is 172.16.10.254/16 and the default_lan is 172.16.0.0/16
    The second lan is 202.1.1.0/24 and it is a staic lan on another gateway.
    When the site-to-site ipsec go up in routing table i see three route on interface ipsec0:
    The remote lan, the default-lan (that is also on default interface. Behaviour?) and a subnet lan 172.16.10.0/24.
    If i ping from a lan pc an ip of subnet 172.16.10.0/24, i see that the arp is equal at mac-address of ISA and i have a problem on the lan. It's normal?
    Best regards

  • ISA 570 Web filtering: can't configure

    Hi
    I have the latest firmware installed but for some reason I don't get the pencil icon when I try to edit a policy profile in Web URL filtering under Security Services.
    Any help would be appreciated

    Hi Neels, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support community. I apologize for this inconvenience; you could use a different browser such as Mozilla, i.e 9.0 in order to resolve this issue.
    I hope you find this answer useful
    “Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
    Greetings, 
    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • Cisco ISA-570, Norton Anti Virus sperrt Outlook Termineinladungen

    Hallo zusammen,
    wenn ich versuche per Outlook jmd. zu einem Termin einzuladen bekommen ich folgende Fehlermeldung von meinem Norton Anti Viren Program:
    Ihre E-Mail konnte nicht gesendet werden, weil die Verbindung zu Ihrem Mail-Server unterbrochen wurde.
    Die E-Mail geht somit nicht raus, ich habe allerdings keine Probleme normale E-Mails mit und ohne Anhang zu verschicken. Habe kurzzeitig in der Firewall mal die  "SMTP Email Attachments" Funktion ausgeschaltet um zu schauen ob das Problem daran liegt, leider hat ich damit kein Erfolg. Erfolg habe ich erst dann wenn ich in den Norton Anti Virus Einstellungen die E-Mail ausgänge nicht überprüfen lasse.
    Wenn ich mich mit meinem PC in einen anderen Netzwerk ausserhalb der Firewall befinde habe ich dieses Problem nicht. Auch andere PCs in dem Cisco Netzwerk kämpfen mit dem gleichen Fehler.
    Hat jemand das gleiche Problem und abhilfe hierzu?
    Danke im voraus

    Cisco hat vor kurzem ein neues Firmware Update rausgebracht, nachdem ich das installiert habe war das Problem behoben.

  • ISA 570 WAN2 as VPN Tunnel Only

    So I have two ISP here in my location. WAN1 is the primary use for everything. WAN2 is to be used ONLY for VPN Tunnels
    Any guides, documents, articles, and help is appreciated.
    In the next phase, I want only select computers to use the WAN2 Internet. I guess this has something to do with VLANS??

    You can also use PBR on your next phase.  You won't have to use VLANs  if  you group your desired systems accordingly in combination with PBR.
    =========================================================
    I need clarification from your above statement. The next phase i stated involves a different network from DEFAULT_NETWORK.
    DEFAULT_NETWORK
    192.168.100.0 /255.255.255.0
    PHASE2_NETWORK
    172.16.0.0 /255.255.255.0
    So this means I am leaning towards VLAN here?
    I tried implementing the guide document you sent. All PC on the DEFAULT_NETWORK had no internet to outside. They are set to a static IP. When I told them to switch to DHCP, they had access. Why is this?
    I will post a desired design of my network here and see if it is feasible. To follow

  • 4800 SE VTD Problem tv-out

    When i use tv-out (DualView) the image crash in the monitor and tv after some time (+- 10minutes), and i have to reset the computer.

    Sorry, i am put more information .
    About 10 minutes de screen show vertical bars and some garbage. i have to reset de computer.
    Xpc Power Pack (St-450W)
    +3.3V => 28A
    +5V => 45A
    +12V => 18A
    +3.3V & +5V => 230W
    +12V => 216W
    -5V => 0.8A 4W
    -12V => 1A 12W
    +5Vsb => 2.5A 12.5W
           ******************** RESUMO DO SISTEMA ********************
           Versão do Windows: Windows 5.1 Service Pack 1 (Geração 2600)
           Tipo de computador: AT/AT COMPATIBLE
           Versão do BIOS do sistema: KT400  - 42302e31
           Data da BIOS do sistema: 09/02/03
           Tipo de processador: x86 Family 6 Model 6 Stepping 2
           Fornecedor de processador: AuthenticAMD
           Número de processadores: 1
           Memória física: 1024 MB
           ******************** INFORMAÇÕES DA UNIDADE DE DISCO ********************
             Unidade A:
               Tipo: Unidade de disquete de 3,5" e 1,44MB
               Espaço total: 1.474.560 bytes
               Cabeças: 2
               Cilindros: 80
               Setores por trilha: 18
               Bytes por setor: 512
             Unidade C:
               Tipo: Unidade de disco fixa
               Espaço total: 31.453.437.952 bytes
               Espaço livre: 14.868.799.488 bytes
               Cabeças: 255
               Cilindros: 14946
               Setores por trilha: 63
               Bytes por setor: 512
             Unidade D:
               Tipo: Unidade de disco fixa
               Espaço total: 91.473.305.600 bytes
               Espaço livre: 12.049.399.808 bytes
               Cabeças: 255
               Cilindros: 14946
               Setores por trilha: 63
               Bytes por setor: 512
             Unidade E:
               Tipo: Unidade de disco fixa
               Espaço total: 81.956.655.104 bytes
               Espaço livre: 31.601.451.008 bytes
               Cabeças: 255
               Cilindros: 9964
               Setores por trilha: 63
               Bytes por setor: 512
           ******************** RESUMO DE IRQ ********************
           Resumo sobre o uso de IRQ:
             (ISA)  0    Timer do sistema
             (ISA)  3    Porta de comunicação (COM2)
             (ISA)  4    Porta de comunicação (COM1)
             (ISA)  6    Controlador padrão de disquete
             (ISA)  8    CMOS do sistema/relógio em tempo real
             (ISA)  9    Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System
             (ISA) 13    Processador de dados numéricos
             (ISA) 14    Canal IDE primário
           Relatório do resumo dos recursos - página: 2
             (ISA) 15    Canal IDE secundário
             (PCI) 16    NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
             (PCI) 16    Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC
             (PCI) 18    HighPoint HPT3xx ATA RAID Controller
             (PCI) 19    Creative EMU10K1 Audio Processor (WDM)
             (PCI) 21    VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller
             (PCI) 21    VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller
             (PCI) 21    VIA Rev 5 or later USB Universal Host Controller
             (PCI) 21    VIA USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller

  • Accesing a class from a different PC on Internet

    Hi all. I have the following problem:
    I have a Java programa that access to serial port to send data to a device. It works good.
    Also I have Jakarta Tomcat installed, and a servlet that instantiate the previous java program that access to serial port.
    If this PC is connected directly to Internet, there are no problems to people from Internet can send data to serial port.
    But I would like to put the device connected to another computer not connected directly to Internet.
    I know Jakarta Topmcat should be on the PC connected directly to Internet, but...are there any possibility that my servlet call my Java serial port programme on a different computer ? E.g: using a special nomination before the class name...Also someone told I should use Java RMI...Dont know if its very difficult to use...
    Would appreciate some advice or example code...
    Thanks...
    John

    RMI seems to be a perfect solution to your problem. It isn't difficult to use, but will involve a little learning. It's a cool technology though, and should be fun to mess around with.
    To learn it go to http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/rmi/index.html
    The example that they use is cool, it's where I learned it first.
    Dave

  • IPSec VPN b/w ISA500 and RV042

    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Could not change to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/crls';
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Could not change to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts': /;
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Could not change to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts': /;
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  error in X.509 certificate default.pem;
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  loaded CA cert file 'default.pem' (2745 bytes);
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  loaded CA cert file 'default_crt.pem' (1070 bytes);
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  error in X.509 certificate default_key.pem;
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  loaded CA cert file 'default_key.pem' (1675 bytes);
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Changed path to directory '/mnt/shiner/certificate';
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=loading secrets from "/tmp/etc/ipsec.d/S2S.secrets";
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  loaded CA cert file 'default.pem' (2745 bytes);
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  loaded CA cert file 'default_crt.pem' (1070 bytes);
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  error in X.509 certificate default_key.pem;
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=  loaded CA cert file 'default_key.pem' (1675 bytes);
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Changed path to directory '/mnt/shiner/certificate';
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=loading secrets from "/tmp/etc/ipsec.d/S2S.secrets";
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets";
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=forgetting secrets;
    2013-07-30 11:37:04
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=added connection description "Tunnel0";
    2013-07-30 11:37:02
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg="Alabang" #117: deleting state (STATE_MAIN_R1);
    2013-07-30 11:37:02
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg="Alabang": deleting connection;
    2013-07-30 11:36:55
    Warning
    IPsec VPN
    msg="Alabang" #117: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2;
    2013-07-30 11:36:55
    Error
    IPsec VPN
    msg=ERROR: "Alabang" #117: sendto on ppp0 to 112.209.172.XXX:500 failed in STATE_MAIN_R0. Errno 101: Network is unreachable;
    2013-07-30 11:36:55
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg="Alabang" #117: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1;
    2013-07-30 11:36:55
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg="Alabang" #117: responding to Main Mode;
    2013-07-30 11:36:55
    Warning
    IPsec VPN
    msg=packet from 112.209.172.XXX:500: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection];
    2013-07-30 11:36:46
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Could not change to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/crls';
    2013-07-30 11:36:46
    Information
    IPsec VPN
    msg=Could not change to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts': /;
    ==============================================================
    Site 1 = Cisco ISA 500. Named as CHI
    Site 2 = Cisco RV042. Named as Alabang
    Shown above is the logs from my ISA 570 IPSec VPN. I have set the same settings for my IKE Policies and my Transform Sets. Attached are the screenshots of my the VPN Settings of my 2 systems. It does show in the table above that the 112.209.172.XXX is unreachable, but please look at screen6.bmp and see that I can very well ping the RV042 system. Please feel free to ask me for more info about my setup.
    On a side note, take a look at Screen5.bmp. This screenie shows that I have an existing WORKING VPN connection to another site with a Linksys RV042, named as Villa. So as you can also see in the screenshot, it has a VPN setup for CHI but it can not connect. Hence my problem above. The VPN setting for Villa is the same as CHI (PFS, IKE, Transforms, PFS).

    Dan,
    Since I'm not a Cisco employee, don't have access to spare ISAs and RVs to setup a lab and test, don't have a setup similar enough to yours to test with, don't have access to your devices, and wouldn't have other than UI access if I did, doing a little trial and error is all I have to work with to assist you.
    That said, it's not random trial and error. From what I'm able to see via your screenshots and explanations, all of your config looks correct. So if everything for Phase 1 & 2 are accurate, then it should work unless there is an interesting traffic mismatch.
    Usually this is pretty straightforward and simple to troubleshoot and confirm. However when you add in additional challenges that come with Multi-WAN support, terminating the VPN on the secondary WAN interface, and PBR, there is a lot of room for possible mistakes as the config is becoming fairly complex.
    So my thought was to remove what I perceived to be the least impacting piece of complexity, which is the custom PBR that is sending those 2 laptops out WAN 2 instead of WAN 1, so that the only non-typical configuration was the VPN terminating on WAN 2.
    Right now I'm assuming the issue isn't the the possibility of the ISA and RV042 being incapable of establishing a VPN. I'm assuming it is either an issue with VPN termination on WAN 2 (which I don't believe is an issue) or something not quite right with PBR and VPN interesting traffic.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Problème de ralentisse​ment sous LabVIEW 7.0

    Bonjour,
    nous rencontrons actuellement un phénomène de ralentissement sur une application développée sous LabVIEW 7.0.
    Description des ressources et de la configuration utilisée (pour info) :
    LabVIEW 7.0
    NI-DAQ 8.0.1
    2 cartes PCI-6229 avec :
    une acquisition analogique à 10 kHz - échantillons prélevés par bloc de 1000
    une acquisition de type codeur
    des entrées/sorties TOR
    2 cartes PCI-6528 (entrées/sorties TOR)
    1 carte MOXA C168H (carte ISA 8 ports série)
    2 cartes Exotest PCI pour dialogue LIN et Ligne K
    L'application tourne en mode debug (= il ne s'agit pas d'un exécutable)
    Application d'environ 350 VIs
    Utilisation (a priori à bon escient) de la réentrance, du parallélisme, de sémaphores, ... (en bref, il s'agit d'une application multi-tâches classique)
    Description des symptômes :
    Le ralentissment constaté n'est pas systématique. L'application tourne en général parfaitement, mais parfois, dès le lancement de celle-ci, parfois après 10 minutes, parfois après une heure, et parfois plus, nous constatons un fort ralentissement de l'application. Cela se traduit par le ralentissement du déroulement de notre séquenceur (il s'agit d'une application pour un banc de test).
    Nous ne constatons aucune augmentation du taux d'occupation du CPU, et aucune augmentation de mémoire.
    La difficulté principale de notre problème est que nous ne savons absolument ce qui peut provoquer un ralentissement si soudain, si imprévisible et qui ne se traduit pas par un taux d'occupation du CPU élevé.
    Actions déjà faites :
    Nous avons utilisé l'outil d'observation de profil des VIs (Outils > Avancé > Optimisation de VIs...) mais n'avons rien constaté d'aberrant.
    Nous avons lu (et appliqué) les principes de la documentation suivante : http://forums.ni.com/attachments/ni/250/7849/1/prf​rmnc.pdf
    La (les) question(s) :
    Un tel phénomène a-t-il déjà été rencontré ?
    Avez-vous des conseils particuliers (autres que ceux contenus dans le document ci-dessus) ?
    Pensez-vous à une action particulière à réaliser ?
    Merci par avance !

    Bonjour,
    Obtenez vous un code d'erreur? A quelle étape s'arrête la création de votre executable ?
    je vous envoie un lien qui traite de probleme d'executable avec les boitiers USB
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/129BE1A90E522E3886256F24007606F4?OpenDocument
    Cordialement
    Alexandre D
    NIF

  • Trying to configure an ISA500

    I am trying to configure an ISA500 (base model without built-in wireless). The customer has a Comcast cable modem, and a Linksys wireless router for his client machines. I have it set up to go from the modem to the ISA WAN port, and then one of the LAN ports is serving up the wireless router. However, this is not working for me. I can see the ISP IP address on port 1, but cannot talk to the wireless router on the LAN port at all. Can someone offer some direction on this? Everything I have looked at online talks only about configuring the 500W model that has its own wireless radio, nothing about 3rd party.

    Hi Jeremiah, you should be able to make a LAN port to LAN port connection to the other wireless router so long as the wireless router has DHCP disabled and an IP address on the same subnet as the ISA.
    -Tom
    Please mark answered for helpful posts

Maybe you are looking for