ISE 1.2 EAP-TLS and AD authentication

Hi,
I am sure I have had this working but Just cant get it to now.
So I have a Computer that has a Certificate on it with the SAN - princible name = to [email protected] This is an auo enroled Cert from my AD.
My Authentication profile says
IF the SSID (called-station) contianes eduroam and Princible name containes @mydomain.com then user a certification authentication profile. (see attachemnt below) 
Then my authorization profile says
if active directoy group = "Domian computers" then allow access.
When my computer trys to join it passes the certificate test, but when it gets to the AD group is get the below.
24433          Looking up machine in Active Directory - [email protected]
24492          Machine authentication against Active Directory has failed
22059          The advanced option that is configured for process failure is used
22062          The 'Drop' advanced option is configured in case of a failed authentication request
But I know my machine is in AD? What do i need to do to get the PC to use EAP-TLS to authenicate and AD group to authorize?
Cheers

This accepts all requsts to one SSID and then as you can see if it is EAP TLS uses Cert store (see below), other wise AH
This jsut says if AD Group = /user/domainComputer allow full access (simple rule)

Similar Messages

  • EAP-TLS and LEAP on a 1200 AP

    Is it possible to have a 1200 AP use EAP-TLS and LEAP authentication simultaneously? We currently use LEAP in production and I have successfully configured a test 1200 AP to use EAP-TLS, but we would like to have it use both methods until all clients can be set up for EAP-TLS.

    You may view this link : http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/sqsw/sq/tech/acstl_wp.htm
    Regards
    Mc

  • ISE 802.1x EAP-TLS machine and smart card authentication

    I suspect I know the answer to this, but thought that I would throw it out there anway...
    With Cisco ISE 1.2 is it possible to enable 802.1x machine AND user smart card  authentication simultaneously for wired/wireless clients (specifically  Windows 7/8, but Linux or OSX would also be good).  I can find plenty of  information regarding 802.1x machine authentication (EAP-TLS) and user  password authentication (PEAP), but none about dual EAP-TLS  authentication using certificates for machines and users at the same time.  I think I can figure out how to configure such a policy in ISE, but options seem to be lacking on the client end.  For example, the Windows 7 supplicant seems only able to present either a machine or user smart card certificate, not one then the other.  Plus, I am not sure how the client would know which certificate to present, or if the type can be specified from the authenticator.

    Hope this video link will help you
    http://www.labminutes.com/sec0045_ise_1_1_wired_dot1x_machine_auth_eap-tls

  • Cisco ISE - EAP-TLS - Machine / User Authentication - Multiple Certificate Authentication Profiles (CAP)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to do machine and user authentication using EAP-TLS and digital certificates.  Machines have certificates where the Principal Username is SAN:DNS, user certificates (smartcards) use SAN:Other Name as the Principal Username.
    In ISE, I can define multiple Certificate Authentication Profiles (CAP).  For example CAP1 (Machine) - SAN:DNS, CAP2 (User) - SAN:Other Name
    Problem is how do you specify ISE to check both in the Authentication Policy?  The Identity Store Sequence only accepts one CAP, so if I created an authentication policy for Dot1x to check CAP1 -> AD -> Internal, it will match the machine cert, but fail on user cert.  
    Any way to resolve this?
    Thanks,
    Steve

    You need to use the AnyConnect NAM supplicant on your windows machines, and use the feature called eap-chaining for that, windows own supplicant won't work.
    an example (uses user/pass though, but same concept)
    http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise/design-zone-security/howto_80_eapchaining_deployment.pdf

  • EAP-TLS and MS AD auth problem

    Hi,
    I have a problem with an ACS to authenticate users with certificate on MS AD.
    Working things:
    PEAP authentication with the MS AD;
    EAP-TLS authentication with the local DB.
    Not working things:
    EAP-TLS authentication with MS AD.
    Because I'm able to auth users with PEAP on MS AD, I guess my config on MS AD is correct.
    Because I'm able to auth users with certif in EAP-TLS, I guess my certif config is correct.
    So, why it's not working with the combination EAP-TLS and MS AD.
    I receive the error 'External DB Account Restriction'
    Thanks for your help.

    This issue is generally seens when there are multiple domains. Try out this step. Choose Network Connections from the control panel. Right-click the local area connection.Choose Properties. Double-click the TCP/IP option. Choose Advanced at the bottom. Click on DNS at the top. Choose Append these DNS suffixes. Add the FQDN for each domain that ACS authenticates against in the field.

  • EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake

    Hi Pros,
                   I am a newbie in the ACS 4.2 and EAP-TLS implementation, with that being said. I face an issue during a EAP-TLS implementation. My search shows that this kind of error message is already certificate issue;However, I have deleted and recreated the certificate in both ACS and the client with the same result. I have deleted and re-install the certchain as well.
    When I check my log in the failed attemps, there is what I found:
    Date
    Time
    Message-Type
    User-Name
    Group-Name
    Caller-ID
    Network Access Profile Name
    Authen-Failure-Code
    Author-Failure-Code
    Author-Data
    NAS-Port
    NAS-IP-Address
    Filter Information
    PEAP/EAP-FAST-Clear-Name
    EAP Type
    EAP Type Name
    Reason
    Access Device
    Network Device Group
    06/23/2010
    17:39:51
    Authen failed
    000e.9b6e.e834
    Default Group
    000e.9b6e.e834
    (Default)
    EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake
    1101
    10.111.22.24
    25
    MS-PEAP
    wbr-1121-zozo-test
    Office Networ
    06/23/2010
    17:39:50
    Authen failed
    [email protected]
    Default Group
    000e.9b6e.e834
    (Default)
    EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake
    1098
    10.111.22.24
    25
    MS-PEAP
    wbr-1121-zozo-test
    Office Network
    [email protected] = my windows active directory name
    1. Why under EAP-TYPE it shows MS-PEAP not EAP-TLS? I did configure EAP-TLS....
    2. Why sometimes it just shows the MAC of the client for username?
    3. Why  it puts me in DEFAULT-GROUP even though i belongs to a group well definy in the acs?
    2. Secondly, When I check in pass authentications... there is what i saw
    Date
    Time
    Message-Type
    User-Name
    Group-Name
    Caller-ID
    NAS-Port
    NAS-IP-Address
    Network Access Profile Name
    Shared RAC
    Downloadable ACL
    System-Posture-Token
    Application-Posture-Token
    Reason
    EAP Type
    EAP Type Name
    PEAP/EAP-FAST-Clear-Name
    Access Device
    Network Device Group
    06/23/2010
    17:30:49
    Authen OK
    groszozo
    NOC Tier 2
    10.11.10.105
    1
    10.111.22.24
    (Default)
    wbr-1121-zozo-test
    Office Network
    06/23/2010
    17:29:27
    Authen OK
    groszozo
    NOC Tier 2
    10.11.10.105
    1
    10.111.22.24
    (Default)
    wbr-1121-zozo-test
    Office Network
    In the output below, it says that the user is authenticate and it puts the user in the right group with the right username, but the user never really authenticate. Maybe for the first few seconds when I initiate the connection.
    Before I forget, the suppliant is using WIN XP and 802.1x is enable. I even uncheck not verify the server and the ACS under External User Databases, I did  check ENABLE EAP-TLS machine authentication.
    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Crazy---

    Any ideas on this guys?? In my end, i've been reading some docs... Things started to make sens to me, but I still cannot authenticate, still the same errors. One more thing that catch my  attention now is the time it takes to open a telnet session to cisco device which has the ACS for auth server.
    My AD(Active Direct) and the ACS server are local same subnet(server subnet). Ping to the ACS from my desktop which is in different subnet is only take 1ms. To confirm that the issue is the ACS server, I decided to use another server in remote location, the telnet connection is way faster than the local ACS.
    Let's brain storm together to figure out this guys.
    Thanks in advance,
    ----Paul

  • EAP-TLS & ACE Appliance "EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed"

    Hello - I have a version 3.2 of the ACS appliance and I am trying to set up a successful test of EAP-TLS. I have a W2K server for a CA and I believe I have the certificate install properly. However, I get the "EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake" error message in my failed attempts log. The troubleshooting document tells me to look at the CSAuth.log file but I can't seem to find in on the ACS Appliance.
    Does anyone have any ideas how to troubleshoot this problem with the appliance?

    If the client's certificate on the ACS is invalid (which depends on the certificate's valid "from" and "to" dates, the server's date and time settings, and CA trust), then the server will reject it and authentication will fail. The ACS will log the failed authentication in the web interface under Reports and Activity > Failed Attempts > Failed Attempts XXX.csv with the Authentication Failure-Code similar to "EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake." If the ACS rejects the client's certificate because the ACS does not trust the CA, the expected error message in the CSAuth.log file is similar to the following.
    AUTH 06/04/2003 15:47:43 E 0345 1696 EAP: ProcessResponse:
    SSL handshake failed, status = 3 (SSL alert fatal:unknown CA certificate)If the ACS rejects the client's certificate because the certificate has expired, the expected error message in the CSAuth.log file is similar to the following.
    AUTH 06/04/2005 15:02:08 E 0345 1692 EAP: ProcessResponse:
    SSL handshake failed, status = 3 (SSL alert fatal:certificate expired)
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a00801df0ea.shtml

  • EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed due to unknown CA certificate during SSL handshake

    Hi All ,
                 I am trying to test EAP_TLS authentication on acs 4.2.1.15 running on Appliance 1120 , I have installed my server certficate along with CA certficate on my appliance box , I have enabled features of  EAP_TLS under golbal authentication setup .
                 I have downloaded client supplicant certficate file for my windows XP machine .
    When i tried to authenticated i am finding following error message under  failed attempts(EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed due to unknown CA certificate during SSL handshake) on my acs appliance box .
    Under certficate revocation list , I have forced my CA as CRL in use . Attached snap shot of all .
    Suggest me whether i need to enable all corresponding CA certficate undercertficate trust list , Kindly let me know were i am doing wrong on this ..

    Hello,
    I am NO expert on certificates but I have seen your error dozens of times from wireless clients on my Cisco ACS 4.2 Radius server.
    Through trial and error I wrote up this procedure for our Helpdesk for installing certs in Windows XP and Windows 7. These steps haven't failed me yet and the Helpdesk doesn't bother me as much anymore so see if this helps you:
    -          Manually install the Global CA under BOTH Trusted Root Certification Authorities\Certificates AND Intermediate Certification                      Authorities\Certificates
    -          Manually install the Intermediate CA under JUST the Intermediate Certification Authorities\Certificates
    -          Delete the wireless network from the computer
    -          REBOOT!!
    -          Open the Microsoft Management Console, “mmc”.
    -          Go FILE\Add Remove SnapIn. Select Certificates ..
    -          If promoted, do it for “My User Account”.
    -          Make sure the certificates are where you put them. 
    -          If you see any of these exact certificates out of place in either Trusted Root Certification Authorities\Certificates or Intermediate Certification                      Authorities\Certificates, remove them.
    -          Redo wireless network setup again
    I hope this helps you.
    Mike

  • EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake to the ACS serve

    We are running the LWAPP (2006 wlc's and 1242 AP's) and using the ACS 4.0 for authentication. Our users are
    experiencing an issue, where they are successfully authenticated the first time, however as the number of them is increasing, they're starting to drop the connections and being prompted to re-authenticate. At this point, they are not being able to authenticate again.
    We're using PEAP for the authentication and Win XP SP2 clients as the supplicants. The error message that we are seeing on the ACS for that controller is "EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake to the ACS server"...Not sure if this error msg is relevant since we have other WLC's that are working OK and still generating the same error msg on the ACS...
    Thanks..

    Here are some configs you can try:
    config advanced eap identity-request-timeout 120
    config advanced eap identity-request-retries 20
    config advanced eap request-timeout 120
    config advanced eap request-retries 20
    save config

  • EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake error

    I have 2 Windows 2003 ACS 3.2 servers. I am in the process of upgrading them to ACS 4.0. I am using them for WPA2/PEAP wireless authentication in a WDS environment. I recently upgraded one to ACS 4.0 and ever since that time some (not all) of my Windows XP clients have started to not be authenticated and logging the error "EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake" on the ACS 4.0 server. During the upgrade (which was successful) I did change the Certificate since the current one was going to expire November 2007.
    The clients that do not authenticate on the ACS 4.0 server I can point to the ACS 3.2 server and they successfully authenticate there. I am able to resolve the issue by recreating the Windows XP PEAP profile for the wireless network and by getting a new client Cert. But, I have a couple of questions:
    Is the "EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake" error due to the upgrade to ACS 4.0 or to the fact that I changed the Certificate, or both?
    Can this error ("EAP-TLS or PEAP authentication failed during SSL handshake") be resolved without me touching every Windows XP client (we have over 250+)?
    Thanks for the help

    My experience suggests that the problem is the certificate.
    I'm running ACS 3.3.
    I received the same error message when my clients copied the certificate to the wrong location, or otherwise did not correctly follow the provided instructions.
    Correctly following the instructions led to a successful connection and no more error message.

  • EAP-TLS and CA export

    Iam using EAP-TLS for client authentication. I dont want connect new user to our wired network in order to install certificate. Is possible to export certificate and install certificate from diskette or from CD?????

    If you are using MS Certificate server you can export the certificates to a file from the web gui by selecting "Retrieve the CA certificate or certificate revocation list" and then either "Download CA certificate" or "Download CA certification path" You are then given the normal download file option.
    Rgds
    Paddy

  • ISE - EAP-TLS and then webAuth?

    Hello everyone!
    I have a little bit of a complex dilemma in an ISE deployment and I am trying to lean more on how it works technically. Long story short: I am trying to do both machine and user authentication / authorization (per requirements from our Security department) on a wireless network using iDevices (iPads, iPhones, iTouches) that are shared between users. Just an FYI, I know Apple devices are not intended for “multiple users”; hence, why it is a problem I am trying to solve with CWA.
    Hardware:
    Cisco ISE VM running 1.1.3.124
    WLC 5508 running 7.4.100.0
    AP 3602I running 7.4.100.0 / IOS 15.2(2)JB$
    iPod Touch version 6.1.3(10B329)
    Senario:
    •- User Authenticates to SSID that is 802.1x WPA2 AES,
    •- Machine is checked by having valid Cert issued by CA and given access to ISE CWA
    •- User open’s their browser
    •- WLC redirects them to ISE CWA
    •- User provides credentials on the portal
    •- User to CoA’d to full access network
    Rules, NSP is a limited profiling access network. CWA is a limited access network with redirect to centeral web auth on ISE. Standard rule 2 & 3 (which are disabled in this screen shot) are the rules that prove the CWA works on an open SSID.
    I have gotten the CWA to work great on an open SSID, however when the process involves EAP-TLS everything works but the redirect. The iPod is properly authorized to the CWA (which is the redirect permission), but when I open a browser the iPod just spins searching for the website; it is never redirected to the ISE. My question is, is this even possible? Is there a trick or order of sequence that needs to be changed? I have been told from a Cisco NCE that specializes in ISE that this “may” or “may not” work, but not given an explanation as to why or why not. And if it’s not possible, why not?
    Thank you in advance!
    Example, now the user is authorized for CWA, but when a user opens the browser it just sits there spinning.
    I checked the WLC “Clients>Details” (from the monitoring page) and I noticed something interesting:

    Please review the below link which might be helpful :
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_60_byod_certificates.pdf
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_man_id_stores.pdf

  • EAP-TLS and ISE 1.1 with AD certificates

    Hello,
    I am trying to configure EAP-TLS authentication with AD certificates.
    All ISE servers are joined to AD
    I have the root certificate from the CA to Activie Directory installed on the ISE servers
    I created the certificate authentication profile using the root certificate
    I have PEAP\EAP-TLS enabled as my allowed protocol
    I am getting the following error for authentication:
    "11507  Extracted EAP-Response/Identity
    12500  Prepared EAP-Request proposing EAP-TLS with challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12301  Extracted EAP-Response/NAK requesting to use PEAP instead
    12300  Prepared EAP-Request proposing PEAP with challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12302  Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response and accepting PEAP as negotiated
    12318  Successfully negotiated PEAP version 0
    12800  Extracted first TLS record; TLS handshake started
    12805  Extracted TLS ClientHello message
    12814  Prepared TLS Alert message
    12817  TLS handshake failed
    12309  PEAP handshake failed"
    I have self-signed certificates on the ISE servers – do they need to be signed by the same CA as the client?
    Any other issues I am missing?
    Thanks,
    Michael Wynston
    Senior Solutions Architect
    CCIE# 5449
    Email: [email protected]
    Phone: (212)401-5059
    Cell: (908)413-5813
    AOL IM: cw2kman
    E-Plus
    http://www.eplus.com

    Please review the below link which might be helpful :
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_60_byod_certificates.pdf
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_man_id_stores.pdf

  • Authentication failed using EAP-TLS and CSSC against ACS

    Hi.
    Playing with a trial version of CSSC (Cisco secure services client) I had a problem that really I don´t understand.
    Any 802.1x configuration work fine but when I use anything involving the use of certificates (EAP-TLS or PEAP using a certificate instead a password to autenticate) I always see the same log message in ACS:
    "Authen session timed out: Challenge not provided by client" It seems that my client supplicant does not repond to the ACS when the first one proposed an EAP method.
    First I discart a certificate error because the same certificate works fine with Intel Proset Wireless supplicant and Windows Zero Configuration. EAP Fast works fine using auto provisioning or manual provisioning.
    Any idea? I red the CSSC administration guide but I did not find anything that explains this behaviour or defines the right configuration for this EAP method.
    I´m using Windows XP SP3, Intel Wireless 4965AGN and CSSC 5.1.1.18; My CA is a Windows CA.ACS version 4.2
    Thanks in advanced.
    Best regards.

    Today is not mmy day.
    It´s still failing and maybe I will open a TAC case.
    I´m looking at the log file of the CSSC and I don´t like what I have seen.
    2125: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.156 -0100: %CSSC-6-INFO_MSG: %[tid=344][mac=1,6,00:1d:e0:9f:05:ef]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: EAP suggested by server: leap
    2126: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.156 -0100: %CSSC-6-INFO_MSG: %[tid=2044][mac=1,6,00:1d:e0:9f:05:ef]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: EAP requested by client:  eapTls
    2127: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.156 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: EAP methods sent : sync=8
    2128: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.156 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: Credential Request completed, response sent : sync=8
    2129: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.156 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: Authentication state transition: AUTH_STATE_UNPROTECTED_IDENTITY_SENT_FOR_FULL_AUTHENTICATION -> AUTH_STATE_UNPROTECTED_IDENTITY_ACCEPTED
    2130: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=344]: Credential callback, type=AC_CRED_SERVER_VERIFY, sync=9
    2131: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=344]: Calling acCredDeferred
    2132: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=344]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: Credential Request deferred : sync=9
    2133: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: Server verification sent : sync=9
    2134: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: Credential Request completed, response sent : sync=9
    2135: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=344]: Credential callback, type=AC_CRED_USER_CERT, sync=10
    2136: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=344]: Calling acCredDeferred
    2137: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=344]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: Credential Request deferred : sync=10
    2138: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: Impersonating user
    2139: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: Loading client certificate private key...
    2140: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.171 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: Calling acCertLoadPrivateKey()...
    2141: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: ...acCertLoadPrivateKey() returned
    2142: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-3-ERROR_MSG: %[tid=140]: Internal error 204, contact software manufacturer
    2143: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: acCertLoadPrivateKey() error -20 [c:\acebuild\bldrobot_cssc_5.1.1.21_view\monadnock\src\ace\certificate\certificateimpl.cpp:239]
    2144: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-3-ERROR_MSG: %[tid=140]: Internal error 4, contact software manufacturer
    2145: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: CssException for function 'acCertLoadPrivateKey' => -20{error} [certificateimpl.cpp:240]
    2146: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-3-ERROR_MSG: %[tid=140]: Internal error 7, contact software manufacturer
    2147: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.187 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: Assertion 'CSS exception - should this be logged instead?' failed at [cssexception.cpp:114]
    2148: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.218 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: Client certificate private key has not been loaded
    2149: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.218 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=140]: Deimpersonating user
    2150: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.218 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: Client certificate 239f43fdcde8e190540fab2416253c5660c0d959 has been processed: ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR(7)
    2151: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.218 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: Certificate 239f43fdcde8e190540fab2416253c5660c0d959 is unusable
    2152: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:29.218 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: {764C6E35-2FFF-47CF-A0CA-5B90E9483367}: Credential Request completed, no response sent : sync=10
    2153: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:30.078 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: Checking for new configuration
    2154: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:32.078 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: Checking for new configuration
    2155: portable-9b7161: oct 28 2010 20:34:34.078 -0100: %CSSC-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2044]: Checking for new configuration
    It seems that It found a valid certificate, starts the Authentication proccess and when it must request the ACS challenge it fails when loading the private key and crash the supplicant 
    Do you think the same??
    Thanks.
    Best Regards.

  • ISE 1.2 EAP-TLS handshake to external RADIUS

    Hi everyone!
    I'm trying to implement ISE to authenticate a wireless network using a cisco WLC 5508, I have an ISE virtual Appliance version 1.2  and a WLC 5508 version 7.6 with several 3602e Access Points (20 aproximately).
    Right now they are authenticating with a RADIUS Server (which I don't manage, it's out of my scope), the WLC uses this RADIUS Server to authenticate using 802.1x and EAP-TLS (which means the clients need to have a valid certificate and be in the RADIUS database which is integrated to the Active Directory), I can't touch the CA either. So now I need to authenticate using Cisco ISE instead of the RADIUS Server (at least directly), the problem is that for "security" reasons or whatever they don't let me integrate the ISE to the CA, so I added the RADIUS server as an external identity source and made my authentication Policy rule pointing at it, like this:
    If: Wireless_802.1X          Allow Protocols: Default Network Access          Use: RADIUS
    Then I added ISE as a RADIUS Server on my WLC and made a Test SSID 802.1X pointing to ISE to authenticate and all that, I did some tests and I got this error:
    12520 EAP-TLS failed SSL/TLS handshake because the client rejected the ISE local-certificate
    Which means the clients are trying to do the EAP-TLS Process to validate the certificate with the Cisco ISE (but ISE does not have the certificate because they won't let me integrate to the CA directly) so it fails. Is there any way I can do something to redirect that EAP-TLS handshake to the exernal RADIUS Server? Making ISE kind of like a connecting point only for the authentication, I realize it's not the best scenario but giving the circumstances it's the best I can do for now, later on I will add the AD to ISE and start creating some authorization policies based on that, but right now I just want them to authenticate.
    Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance!

Maybe you are looking for