ISE and wireless CWA

Need some help on this one.
This is ISE 1.1.1 and WLC 7.2
I want to use CWA and Webauth for guest users, and I have configured that on the ISE and WLC.
This is working but I need some clarification :-)
First I tried to use AuthC policy with
allowed protocolls= PAP-ASCII + Host lookup
Result of that was that for Mac OS X an MS PC it's no problem, I get redirected, logon, press yes on the AUP and I can go on surfing the web.
But on the iOS devices I get redirected to the guest logon page, put in my credentials and insted of the AUP page I get a network error, could not connect.
If I change AuthC to
allowed protocolls= Default Network Access
All is working fine for all endpoints.
Im looking at the RADIUS Authentication Details but I dont understand what iPhone/iPad do diffrent?
An other question here, can I get a redirect after successfull logon instead of 'Please retry your orginal URL request'?
Thanks!

I did solv this (sort of) using html redirect on a custom portal, going to the customers web page.
http://www.cisco.com/">
It would be nice to have a redirect to the page the user wanted to view prior to login but this is good enough

Similar Messages

ISE and Wireless compatibiity

we are in the process of preparing to upgrade our Wireless Controllers from 7.2.110 to 7.6.130. When I check the ISE compatibility matrix, it does not specifically list 7.6 WLC code as supported on ISE 1.1.4 or ISE 1.2. I assume it is, given 7.5 is listed as supported in the 1.2 matrix. Can you verify that 7.6.130 WLC code is supported in ISE 1.1.4 AND ISE 1.2.1?

Yes, it is. I have done several ISE deployments with WLCs running 7.6. With that being said, stay away from 7.5. It is not a good code and it is full of issues.
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

Inline Posture between Cisco ISE and Wireless LAN Controller

Hi,
I was looking into Cisco ISE solution for deploying NAC.
I have a question about the network topology.
In the user guide documents of cisco ISE, it is written that for Wireless LAN Controllers (WLC) and VPN devices, an additional server, Inline Posture, is needed.
However, in the following integration document, there is not an inline posture between WLC and Cisco ISE server.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-18121
I want to know if Inline Posture is a requirement, if not a requirement, what are the benefits of having it between Cisco ISE Server and WLC.
Thanks & Regards
Sinan

Hello,
Please go through below mentioned links which might be helpful for you.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/installation_guide/ise_deploy.html
Best Regards,

Ask the Expert: Cisco BYOD Wireless Solution: ISE and WLC Integration

With Jacob Ideji, Richard Hamby and Raphael Ohaemenyi
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about the new Identity Solutions Engine (ISE) and Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) hardware/software, integration, features, specifications, client details, or just questions about Cisco's Bring-your-own device (BYOD) solution with cisco Experts Richard Hamby, Jacob Ideji, and Raphael Ohaemenyi. The interest in BYOD (Bring You Own Device) solutions in the enterprise has grown exponentially as guests and company users increasingly desire to use personal devices to access . Cisco BYOD enhances user experience and productivity while providing security, ease-of-administration, and performance. The heart of the Cisco wireless BYOD solution is Identity Solutions Engine (ISE) utilizing the Cisco Unified Wireless portfolio. Starting with ISE v1.1.1MR and WLC (Wireless LAN Controller) code v7.2.110.0 and higher, end-to-end wireless BYOD integration is reality.
Jacob Ideji is the technical team lead in the Cisco authentication, authorization and accounting (AAA) security team in Richardson, Texas. During his four years of experience at Cisco he has worked with Cisco VPN products, Cisco Network Admission Control (NAC) Appliance, Cisco Secure Access Control Server, and Dot1x technology as well as the current Cisco Identity Services Engine. He has a total of more than 12 years experience in the networking industry. Ideji holds CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCDA, CCDP, and CISM certifications from Cisco plus other industry certifications.
Richard Hamby works on the Cisco BYOD Plan, Design, Implement (PDI) Help Desk for Borderless Networks, where he is the subject matter expert on wireless, supporting partners in the deployment of Cisco Unified Wireless and Identity Services Engine solutions. Prior to his current position, Hamby was a customer support engineer with the Cisco Technical Assistance Center for 3 years on the authentication, authorization, accounting (AAA) and wireless technology teams.
Raphael Ohaemenyi Raphael Ohaemenyi is a customer support engineer with the authentication, authorization and accounting (AAA) team in the Technical Assistance Center in Richardson, Texas, where he supports Cisco customers in identity management technologies. His areas of expertise include Cisco Access Control Server, Cisco Network Admission Control (NAC) Appliance, Cisco Identity Services Engine, and IEEE 802.1X technologies. He has been at Cisco for more than 2 years and has worked in the networking industry for 8 years. He holds CCNP, CCDP, and CCSP certification.
Remember to use the rating system to let Jacob, Richard and Raphael know if you have received an adequate response.
Jacob, Richard and Raphael might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the wireless mobility sub community forum shortly after the event. This event lasts through Oct 5th, 2012. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

OOPS !!
I will repost the whole messaqge with the correct external URL's:
In general, the Trustsec design and deployment guides address the specific support for the various features of the 'whole' Cisco TS (and other security) solution frameworks. And then a drill-down (usually the proper links are embedded) to the specifc feature, and then that feature on a given device. TS 2.1 defines the use of ISE or ACS5 as the policy server, and confiugration examples for the platforms will include and refer to them.
TrustSec Home Page
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns1051/index.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns170/ns896/ns1051/product_bulletin_c25-712066.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5712/ps11637/ps11195/at_a_glance_c45-654884.pdf
I find this page very helpful as a top-level start to what features and capabilities exist per device:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns170/ns896/ns1051/trustsec_matrix.html
The TS 2.1 Design Guides
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/landing_DesignZone_TrustSec.html
DesignZone has some updated docs as well
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns982/networking_solutions_program_home.html#~bng
As the SGT functionality (at this point) is really more of a router/LAN/client solution, the most detailed information will be in the IOS TS guides like :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/6_x/nx-os/security/configuration/guide/b_Cisco_Nexus_7000_NX-OS_Security_Configuration_Guide__Release_6.x.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_usr_cts/configuration/xe-3s/asr1000/sec-usr-cts-xe-3s-asr1000-book.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/trustsec/configuration/guide/trustsec.html

CWA with ISE and 5760

Hi,
we have an ISE 1.2 (Patch 5), two 5760 Controllers (3.3), one acting as Primary Controller (named WC7) for the APs and the other as Guest Anchor (named WC5).
I have trouble with the CWA. The Guest is redirected and enters the correct credentials. After that, the CoA fails with error-cause(272) 4 Session Context Not Found. I have no idea why....
aaa authentication login Webauth_ISE group ISE
aaa authorization network cwa_macfilter group ISE
aaa authorization network Webauth_ISE group ISE
aaa accounting network ISE start-stop group ISE
aaa server radius dynamic-author
client 10.232.127.13 server-key 0 blabla
auth-type any
radius-server attribute 6 on-for-login-auth
radius-server attribute 31 send nas-port-detail mac-only
wlan test4guests 18 test4guests
aaa-override
accounting-list ISE
client vlan 1605
no exclusionlist
mac-filtering cwa_macfilter
mobility anchor
nac
no security wpa
no security wpa akm dot1x
no security wpa wpa2
no security wpa wpa2 ciphers aes
security dot1x authentication-list Webauth_ISE
no shutdown
wc5# debug aaa coa
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: COA: 10.232.127.13 request queued
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: authenticator CC 33 26 77 56 96 30 58 - BC 99 F3 1A 3C 61 DC F4
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address      [4]   6   10.232.127.11
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 14 "40f308c3c53d"
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: Event-Timestamp     [55] 6   1393503547
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS:   22 F8 CF 1C 61 F3 F9 42 01 E4 36 77 9C 9B CC 56            [ "aB6wV]
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco       [26] 41
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   35 "subscriber:command=reauthenticate"
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco       [26] 43
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   37 "subscriber:reauthenticate-type=last"
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco       [26] 49
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: RADIUS:   Cisco AVpair       [1]   43 "audit-session-id=0aea2001530f2e1e000003c6"
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: COA: Message Authenticator decode passed
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: ++++++ CoA Attribute List ++++++
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB84A0 0 00000001 nas-ip-address(600) 4 10.232.127.11
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB87EC 0 00000081 formatted-clid(37) 12 40f308c3c53d
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB8820 0 00000001 Event-Timestamp(445) 4 1393503547(530F2D3B)
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB8854 0 00000001 reauthenticate-type(756) 4 last
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB8888 0 00000081 audit-session-id(819) 24 0aea2001530f2e1e000003c6
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB88BC 0 00000081 ssg-command-code(490) 1 32
Feb 27 12:19:08.444:
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: ++++++ Received CoA response Attribute List ++++++
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB84A0 0 00000001 nas-ip-address(600) 4 10.232.127.11
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB87EC 0 00000081 formatted-clid(37) 12 40f308c3c53d
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB8820 0 00000001 Event-Timestamp(445) 4 1393503547(530F2D3B)
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB8854 0 00000001 reauthenticate-type(756) 4 last
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB8888 0 00000081 audit-session-id(819) 24 0aea2001530f2e1e000003c6
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB88BC 0 00000081 ssg-command-code(490) 1 32
Feb 27 12:19:08.444: 92FB88F0 0 00000002 error-cause(272) 4 Session Context Not Found
Feb 27 12:19:08.444:
wc5#

Reason for this are two bugs which prevent this from working:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCul83594
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCun38344
This is embarrassing because this is a really common scenario. QA anyone?
So, with ISE and 5760 CWA is not working at this time.

ISE and WLC for posture remediation

Please can anybody clarify a few things in relation to ISE and wireless posture.
1) Is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for remediation, or is it just an ACL to redirect only some traffic to kickoff posture checking?
2) Can/Should a dACL/wACL be specified as a remediation ACL?
3) Do the WLC ACLs have to be written in long format (manually specifying source and dest ports/doesny direction any work?)
4) Does anybody have working example ACLs for posture redirect (cpp) and remediation (dACL)?
5) Any other advice or pointers would be helpful too as no docs i have found so far, be it TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, dont seem to help me understand WLC posture and remediation
thanks
Nick

Nick,
Answers are inline:
1) Is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for remediation, or is it just an ACL to redirect only some traffic to kickoff posture checking? This is for both (if ports 8905..are included) then this is for initial redirection, and remediation
2) Can/Should a dACL/wACL be specified as a remediation ACL? Wireless does not support DACL, you will have to reference another ACL in the the authorization policy, the new versions have the Airespace ACL field, where you will have the ACL defined locally on the wlc.
3) Do the WLC ACLs have to be written in long format (manually specifying source and dest ports/doesny direction any work?) Yes you have to add two entries, for example for all traffic redirection to ise...source = any, destination=iseipadd, source port=any, destination port=any direction=any action=permit
source=iseipaddr, destination ip = any, source port=any, destination port=any, direction=any action permit. Its not the easiest but I will attach a screenshot that will show you my example.
4) Does anybody have working example ACLs for posture redirect (cpp) and remediation (dACL)? ISE doesnt support DACLs so when you build your authorization profile in ISE you select the web authentication type (Posture Discovery) after that the ACL field will come up, there you will "call" the posture ACL which is defined on your controller.
5) Any other advice or pointers would be helpful too as no docs i have found so far, be it TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, dont seem to help me understand WLC posture and remediation Keep in mind that you have to have radius NAC and AAA override enabled under the advanced settings for COA to work.
You have to turn on COA under the global settings in ISE (Administration > Profiling > Coa Type > Reauth)
Then you have to build your policies so that when a user connects to the network they are redirected to the download the nac agent (this is where the Posture Discovery and redirect ACL work in tandem).
Once the client download the nac agent and is compliant the report is forwarded to ISE where a COA event is triggered.
Then the client will reauthenticate and will hit another policy that will give them access once their machine is compliant, you can set the ACLs for restricted access, use dynamic vlan assignment, or just send the access-accept.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

ISE and 802.1x - Retrieve User Cert from AD for Auth without it being in the Personal Store?

Hello,
We are implementing 802.1x EAP-TLS wired at the moment with Cisco ISE, and wireless is to come after that, along with our internal PKI. I set up the PKI, and our network engineer is setting up the ISE. We currently have it set to first authenticate the computers with a computer certificate (allowing access to AD, among some other things), and then further authenticate the users with user certificates.
I don't have much knowledge of Cisco ISE, and plan to learn as we go, but I'm wondering:
Is it possible to authenticate the computer via the computer certificate, getting access to AD, and then have the ISE check AD for the User certificate INSTEAD of the User certificate being in the local Personal store of the client computer? We have autoenrollment going for user certificates, but it seems to be cumbersome (in thought) that once 802.1x is enabled, a new computer/employee coming on the network has to first go to an unauthenticated port to be able to download the User certificate in the Personal store, before then being able to use an 802.1x port?
I guess that makes two questions:
1) Can ISE pull the user cert from AD, without needing it in the local Personal store?
2) What's the easiest way to handle new computers/users that don't already have the User cert in their local Personal store once 802.1x is enabled?

1)No
2)Use EAP-Chaining with EAP-TLS and PEAP
For this scenario, i would go with Cisco AnyConnect NAM, and then use EAP-Chaining, with EAP-TLS for machine auth, and then PEAP for user authentication. This way you can make sure that both the machine and the user is authenticated, and more importantly, that a user can not get on the network with their user identity only and no machine identity. Using windows own supplicant for this, gives no garantee that the user has logged in from an authenticated machine. The feature that used to be used for this before EAP-Chaining was introduced, is called MAR, and has many problems, making it almost useless in a corporate environment. Security wise, the PEAP-MSCHAPV2 is tunneled in EAP-FAST and does not have the same security issues as regular PEAP.

CWA using ISE and mobility anchor

My team is trying to demo wireless guest access using CWA with an ISE server. We appear to be hitting an issue when combining this with mobility anchoring.
When we don't use a mobility anchor the authentication goes off without a hitch seemingly proving that the ISE configuration is sound. The test laptop associates and gets redirected, auths, moves to the RUN state and access to the network is granted.
When the mobility anchor is enabled, the test laptop does get redirected, authentication is successful, but the process does not fully complete, as on the foreign controller the user is in RUN state whereas on the anchor the user is still stuck at CWA required.
Now, I've read the L2 auth occurs between the foreign controller and ISE, and the L3 auth occurs between the anchor controller and ISE, but this does not appear to borne out in packet captures of the process where both parts of the auth seems to go to and from the foreign controller and ISE.
I'm curious to know if anyone else has come across this issue, or has ideas where I should be looking in the config or debugs to find the root cause.
When setting up the controllers and ISE this guide (linked below) was used and the controllers are 2504 controllers on 7.5 series software and ISE is on the latest 1.2 patches:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080bead09.shtml
To me it seems to be mobility related, but the authentication flow does seem to be off compared with what the guide says.

FOREIGN
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Adding mobile on LWAPP AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20(1)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Association received from mobile on BSSID 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:2f
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Global 200 Clients are allowed to AP radio
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Max Client Trap Threshold: 0 cur: 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Rf profile 600 Clients are allowed to AP wlan
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying Interface policy on Mobile, role Unassociated. Ms NAC State 0 Quarantine Vlan 0 Access Vlan 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Re-applying interface policy for client
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv4 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2164)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv6 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2185)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Retaining the ACL recieved in AAA attributes 255 on mobile
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 In processSsidIE:4565 setting Central switched to TRUE
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 In processSsidIE:4568 apVapId = 1 and Split Acl Id = 65535
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying site-specific Local Bridging override for station 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - vapId 1, site 'AP-Group-CHEC.default', interface 'management'
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying Local Bridging Interface Policy for station 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - vlan 84, interface id 0, interface 'management'
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 processSsidIE statusCode is 0 and status is 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 processSsidIE ssid_done_flag is 0 finish_flag is 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 STA - rates (8): 140 18 152 36 176 72 96 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 suppRates statusCode is 0 and gotSuppRatesElement is 1
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfProcessAssocReq (apf_80211.c:7830) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from Idle to AAA Pending
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 20) in 10 seconds
*radiusTransportThread: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Username entry (00-1E-C2-C0-96-05) created for mobile, length = 253
*radiusTransportThread: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Username entry (00-1E-C2-C0-96-05) created in mscb for mobile, length = 253
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Received SGT for this Client.
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Redirect URL received for client from RADIUS. Client will be moved to WebAuth_Reqd state to facilitate redirection. Skip web-auth Flag = 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 acl from 255 to 255
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 Flex acl from 65535 to 65535
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying Interface policy on Mobile, role Unassociated. Ms NAC State 2 Quarantine Vlan 0 Access Vlan 84
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Re-applying interface policy for client
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv4 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2164)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv6 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2185)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Retaining the ACL recieved in AAA attributes 0 on mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Inserting AAA Override struct for mobile
MAC: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05, source 2
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Initializing policy
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Change state to AUTHCHECK (2) last state START (0)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 AUTHCHECK (2) Change state to L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) last state AUTHCHECK (2)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Not Using WMM Compliance code qosCap 00
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Plumbed mobile LWAPP rule on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 vapId 1 apVapId 1 flex-acl-name:
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Change state to DHCP_REQD (7) last state L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfMsAssoStateInc
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2 (apf_policy.c:333) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from AAA Pending to Associated
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2:session timeout forstation 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - Session Tout 1800, apfMsTimeOut '1800' and sessionTimerRunning flag is 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 49) in 1800 seconds
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Func: apfPemAddUser2, Ms Timeout = 1800, Session Timeout = 1800
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:2f (status 0) ApVapId 1 Slot 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfProcessRadiusAssocResp (apf_80211.c:3066) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from Associated to Associated
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:04:59.567: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 308,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec03)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:04:59.567: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP (encap type 0xec03) mstype 0ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:04:59.567: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP dropping packet due to ongoing mobility handshake exchange, (siaddr 0.0.0.0, mobility state = 'apfMsMmQueryRequested'
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:01.523: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 308,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec03)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:01.523: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP (encap type 0xec03) mstype 0ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:01.523: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP dropping packet due to ongoing mobility handshake exchange, (siaddr 0.0.0.0, mobility state = 'apfMsMmQueryRequested'
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) State Update from Mobility-Incomplete to Mobility-Complete, mobility role=ExpForeign, client state=APF_MS_STATE_ASSOCIATED
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfMsRunStateInc
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Change state to RUN (20) last state DHCP_REQD (7)
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Reached PLUMBFASTPATH: from line 5793
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Adding Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP Client
on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 0
IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv6 ACL ID = 255,
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206 Local Bridging Vlan = 84, Local Bridging intf id = 0
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.363: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:02.364: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Set bi-dir guest tunnel for 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:02.364: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 Added NPU entry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:02.364: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Skip Foreign / Export Foreign Client IP 0.0.0.0 plumbing in FP SCB
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 308,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec03)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP (encap type 0xec03) mstype 0ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP processing DHCP REQUEST (3)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   op: BOOTREQUEST, htype: Ethernet, hlen: 6, hops: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   xid: 0xafea6bc9 (2951375817), secs: 5, flags: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   chaddr: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   ciaddr: 0.0.0.0, yiaddr: 0.0.0.0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   siaddr: 0.0.0.0, giaddr: 0.0.0.0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   requested ip: 10.130.98.8
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREPLY (2) (len 320,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec07)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP processing DHCP ACK (5)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   op: BOOTREPLY, htype: Ethernet, hlen: 6, hops: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   xid: 0xafea6bc9 (2951375817), secs: 0, flags: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   chaddr: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   ciaddr: 0.0.0.0, yiaddr: 10.130.98.8
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   siaddr: 10.30.4.173, giaddr: 0.0.0.0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP   server id: 1.1.1.2 rcvd server id: 1.1.1.2
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) DHCP Address Re-established
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Reached PLUMBFASTPATH: from line 6978
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Replacing Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP Client
on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 0
IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv6 ACL ID
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206 Local Bridging Vlan = 84, Local Bridging intf id = 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Assigning Address 10.130.98.8 to mobile
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP success event for client. Clearing dhcp failure count for interface management.
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP success event for client. Clearing dhcp failure count for interface management.
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP successfully bridged packet to STA
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:03.889: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Set bi-dir guest tunnel for 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:03.889: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 Added NPU entry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:03.890: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Skip Foreign / Export Foreign Client IP 10.130.98.8 plumbing in FP SCB
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Received SGT for this Client.
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 acl from 0 to 255
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 Flex acl from 65535 to 65535
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 AAA redirect is NULL. Skipping Web-auth for Radius NAC enabled WLAN.
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Retaining the ACL recieved in AAA attributes 255 on mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Inserting AAA Override struct for mobile
MAC: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05, source 2
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Setting session timeout 3600 on mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Session Timeout is 3600 - starting session timer for the mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying cached RADIUS Override values for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 (caller pem_api.c:2307)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Setting session timeout 3600 on mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Session Timeout is 3600 - starting session timer for the mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Applied RADIUS override policy
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Replacing Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP Client
on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 0
IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv6 ACL ID
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206 Local Bridging Vlan = 84, Local Bridging intf id = 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Not Using WMM Compliance code qosCap 00
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Plumbed mobile LWAPP rule on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 vapId 1 apVapId 1 flex-acl-name:
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Change state to RUN (20) last state RUN (20)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfMsAssoStateInc
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2 (apf_policy.c:333) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from AAA Pending to Associated
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2:session timeout forstation 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - Session Tout 3600, apfMsTimeOut '1800' and sessionTimerRunning flag is 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 49) in 3600 seconds
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Func: apfPemAddUser2, Ms Timeout = 1800, Session Timeout = 3600
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.718: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:2f (status 0) ApVapId 1 Slot 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.718: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfProcessRadiusAssocResp (apf_80211.c:3066) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from Associated to Associated
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.720: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Set bi-dir guest tunnel for 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.720: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 Added NPU entry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4

ISE and NAC wireless guest networks

I have a wireless network that is NAC controlled and use lobby ambassador for guest wireless. What is the best way to migrate to ISE for guest. Are there problems running NAC and ISE on the same controller?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Hello,
For your query regarding ISE and NAC following are my findings, which might help you in order to solve your query.
for your first question:-
ISE is a free software upgrade for customers who have NAC appliance or NAC profiler. This is for both for the base and advance licenses.
ISE is a 50% software discount for customers who have NAC guest server. The 50% discount is a migration part for the base license only. The advance features license will not be impacted by this discount.
for your second question:-
There should be no issues running NAC and ISE on the same controller until and unless you are using two SSIDs.

WLC 7.5 Sleeping clients with ISE and Central WEB Auth(CWA)

Hi there,
Is it possibe to use sleeping clients when using ISE and CWA?
I was thinking of enabling layer3 auth with web auth on mac auth failure, but will that work with CWA?
Or is the only solution to use LWA?

Controller-> General-> User Idle Timeout (seconds) = 50 000 sec.
And your users will be connected all this time even if they going in sleepmode
be carefull with CPU loading

ISE 1.2 CWA with Multiple PSNs - SessionID Replication / Session Expired

Hi all.
I have a (2) Policy Services Nodes (PSNs) in an ISE 1.2 deployment running patch 1. We are using Wireless MAB and CWA on 5760 Wireless LAN Controllers running v3.3.3.
We are hitting an issue wherein a client first passes MAB and then gets redirected to a CWA custom portal. The client then receives a Session Expired message. This seems to be related to the fact that CWA is technically a 2-stage authentication (MAB by the WLC and then CWA by the client). Specifically, it seems to happen when the WLC makes its MAB RADIUS access-request to PSN-1 and then the client comes in to PSN-2 to complete the CWA. This issue does not happen when only one PSN is in use and all authentication traffic (both MAB RADIUS and CWA) is directed at a single PSN.
Clients resolve the FQDN in the redirect URL using public DNS and a public DNS zone file (call it cwa-portal.example.com). cwa-portal.example.com has two A records for the two PSN nodes. DNS is responding to queries using DNS round-robin.
I have the PSNs configured in a Node Group for session information replication between PSNs, but this doesn't seem to make a difference in behavior.
So I ask:
What is the recommended architecture for CWA when using more than one PSN? It seems that you would need to keep the two authentication flows pinned together so that they both hit the same PSN when using more than one PSN in a deployment. A load balancer balancing on the SessionID string comes to mind (both the RADIUS MAB request and the CWA URL contain this unique per-client SessionID), but that seems terribly overbuilt for a seemingly simple problem. On the other hand, it also seems like using a Node Group setup should easily be able to replicate client SessionIDs to all nodes in the deployment so that this isn't an issue. I.e., if the WLC authenticates MAB on PSN-1, then PSN-1 should tell the Node Group about it such that when the client CWA's on PSN-2, PSN-2 doesn't respond with a Session Expired message.
Is there any Cisco documentation that talks about this?
Possibly related:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12131531/ise-12-guest-access-session-expired
Justin

Tim,
Thanks for your reply and confirming my suspicion. Hopefully a future version of ISE will provide automated SessionID synchronization among PSNs so that front-end finagling in a multi-PSN environment won't be necessary.
For anyone else with this issue who for whatever reason can't implement a load balancer(s), I built an automated EEM applet running on a "watchdog" switch (3750 running 12.2(55)SEE9) using IPSLA tracking that senses when PSN1 is down and then
modifies an ASA to change its client-facing NAT statement for PSN1 to PSN2
modifies the primary and HA wireless LAN controllers to change its MAB RADIUS aaa server group to use PSN2
reverts the ASA and WLCs to using PSN1 when PSN1 is detected up and running again
The applet ensures the SessionID authentications stay "glued" together so that both WLCs and the client hit the same PSN for both stages of authentication. It's failover only, not a load balancing solution, but it meets our current project's need for an automated HA environment.
PM me if you want the code. I'm have a little too much going on ATM to sanitize and post it. :)
Justin

ISE and Selfservice with single SSID

Hi, i have:
WLAN 2504 Controller with 7.2 Software
ISE 1.1.2
A single SSID with 802.1x Authentication
Today the wireless users are authenticated against an cisco acs. I want to switch to the ISE and make use of the mydevices portal. I want to re-use my single SSID and don't want to make any provisioning.
- The user connects to the single SSID
- The user configures peap authentication on his device
- The user authenticates to a ldap directory with username and password
- After successfull authentication the user will be redirected to the mydevices portal
- he logs in with his ldap credentials
- the mac address of his current device is listed in the mydevice portal
- user adds his device to the known devices list
- manual reconnect to my ssid
Is this possible with ISE? Is there a howto out there with exact this scenario?
Kind regards

Hello Andreas,
WLC 2504 supports CWA, CoA & dACL.
This wireless controller also supports MAC filtering with RADIUS lookup. For WLCs that support version 7.2.103.0, there is support for session ID and COA with MAC filtering so it is more MAB-like. So it should fulfill your requirement and you can use single SSID.
For more detailed help review “Universal WLC Configuration Guide” & “ISE 1.1.x Network Component Compatibility” at the following location:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_11_universal_wlc_config.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html
Regards,
Ashok

ISE and WLC SRE module compatibilty matrix

Hi all,
We are running SRE module on router with code of 6.x release .Is there any compatibilty matrix available for ISE and WLC code to support CWA . because as of now , the wireless clients are not redirecting to the ISE login page.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,
Regards,
Vijay

The doc is for wireless guest using CWA. For wired guest, I don't know since you can do wired guest from a WLC that supports it or from a switch.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Guest Cert problems ISE and Anchor WLC

I'm setting up new Guest Wireless, I have 2 internal foreign 5508 WLC's talking to 2 DMZ anchor WLC's. The guest connects to Guest SSID and the anchor controllers acts as a DHCP server, the Guest interface configured on the WLC is the in the range of the DHCP scope I've setup. The DHCP scope is using the anchor WLC Mgmt interface as the DHCP server.
Guest SSID - is setup for Webauth and Guest is redirected to the ISE server https://wlc.company.com/login...., when the page is presented to the Guest they get cert problem because the cert is not trusted (its an Internal Cert), Guest logins in ok and the AUP says "cert not trusted" 1.1.1.1 name of the WLC wlc.company.com.
In the browser Guest has https://wlc.company.com/loginredirecthttps://1.1.1.1........
1.1.1.1 is the Virtual interface of the Anchor WLC.
How can I get the client to stop using the Virtual Interface for cert. Why is the WLC doing this? I gather something to do with DHCP?
My plan is to apply a External Cert on the ISE for Guests, that way they will automatically trust a cert from Geotrust for example. But I'm going to still run into this Cert "not trusted" problem where the Guest is not trusting the WLC anchor Virtual Interface 1.1.1 . Why is the guest using the Virtual interface error 1.1.1.1. I've even added the ISE name of the cert to the Virtual interface, same problem, instead its just says wlc.company.com not trusted. I have also imported the cert onto the WebAuth cert on anchor WLC, still doesn't work.
Hopefully I've explained this ok.....any ideas? but if the Guest page keeps getting presented with
https://wlc.company.com/loginredirecthttps://1.1.1.1........ it will never work.

I followed Richard's advice and started from scratch, removing LWA and implementing CWA -MAB. It didn't take too long to setup CWA and get authentication working, I appled a Preauth ACL on WLC's and on ISE under Authorization pofile (CWA)
This is when the problems started happening, I was using the default ISE Authorization profile
cisco-av-pair = url-redirect=https://ip:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionid=SessionValueIdValue&action=cwa.which is not what I want, again the certificate is the server cert which is not an external Cert that the guest wants to see. The user can login fine, unlike LWA, with Firefox or IE it would accept the cert and login so at least I had a working Guest wifi solution. Though there was a cert error symbol at the end of the browser url.
The next step I tried was to change the Authorization Profile to
(wireless.company.com which is a C-NAME for ISE box and has this Alias in the cert, this was a test before I apply the external cert)
cisco-av-pair = url-redirect=https://wireless.company.com:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionid=SessionValueIdValue&action=cwa
I applied the change and the new page appeared on the users laptop, great, but this time users were declined access via live Authentications, reason "Cannot login due to session id expiry, please login a again", I created a new user a/c, same problem. Not good. Ok so I thought well if I want clear all these stale session id's that appartenly exist I'll stop/start the application which I did from the command line, still the same error "Cannot login due to session id expiry". hmmm, whats going on here.
I then rebooted the ISE (this must clear all the sessions!), reboot I performed from home and now for some reason I cannot login to the ISE front end GUI with the admin account or my account. Tried resetting the GUI password for admin and other admin users, the message "Error: cannot reset password this can only be performed on Standalone or Primary node" Well what have I done, just rebooted ISE nothing else apart from changing authorization profile. This box is a Standalone node. Without seeing if the clients connect due t no GUI access, I have referred this issue to TAC!
Also I don't like the fact that your have to install a external cert against the internal node name, epsecially when its external. But again I haven't reached this part yet.

VWLC wireless CWA support

I am working on an ISE demo with version 1.1.2 and vWLC 7.3.101.0 code and am configuring wireless CWA. I get the following error message: Cannot enable MAC filtering and other Layer2 Security with RADIUS NAC.
Does anyone know if wireless CWA is supported on the Virtual WLC platform? I know it is supported on the 25/55xx controllers as of 7.2 code.

Jeff,
You can not combine mac filtering with dot1x on the SSID. You will have to use 2 seperate SSIDs, one with mac filtering and the other with dot1x.
Also you will need to open a tac case since the vlan assignment is not working on the published code releases, i ran into this a few weeks back and the bug id is - CSCua58554
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

ISE and wireless CWA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for