ISE HA Deployment prerequisite issue.

I encountered this HA node deployment issue.Actually , I finished this feature with the enviroment of CA and DNS.However,Can I finish ISE‘s HA deployment without CA and DNS.
When I adding the second ISE node to the first one,I fill the blank with the second ISE's server IP address,the system notification indicates that Unalbe to authenticate xxx.Please check server and CA certificate configuration and try agian.
After that notification, I deploy the CA and DNS server.Also I signed the certificate and install the root CA for both ISE nodes,DNS records also be done.After that,I fill the blank with second ISE's FQDN and administration account .It can be done successfully.
So if my enviroment doesn't have CA and DNS.Does that mean I can't finish ISE'S HA function?
Any help or suggestion will be appreciated!

Hi,
You can not do ISE HA deployment without CA and DNS.
DNS : When you upgrade a complete Cisco ISE deployment, Domain Name System (DNS) server resolution is mandatory; otherwise the upgrade will fail.
CA : During the split deployment upgrade, before you register the nodes to the new primary Administration node, you must do the following:
-If you use self-signed certificate, you must import the self-signed certificate of all nodes to your new primary Administration node.
-If you use different CA certificates for the nodes, you must import all the CA certificates into the new primary Administration node.
-If you use the same CA certificate for the nodes, you must import that CA certificate into the new primary Administration node.

Similar Messages

Need suggestion for ISE distributed deployment model in two different data centers along with public certificate for HTTPS

Hi Experts,
I am bit confused about ISE distributed deployment model .
I have two data centers one is DC & other one is as a DR I have requirement of guest access service implementation using CWA and get public certificate for HTTPS to avoid certificate error on client devices :
how do i deploy ISE persona for HA in this two data centers
After reading cisco doc , understood that we can have two PAN ( Primary in DC & Secondary in DR ) like wise for MnT (Monitoring will be as same as PAN ) however I can have 5 PSN running in secondary i.e. in DR ISE however I have confusion about HA for PSN .. since we have all PSN in secondary , it would not work for HA if it fails
Can anybody suggest me the best deployment solution for this scenario ?
Another doubt about public certificate :
Public Certificate: The ISE domain must be a registered or part of a registered domain name on the Internet. for that I need Domain name being used from customer .
Please do correct me if I am wrong about certificate understanding :
since Guest will be the outside users , we can not use certificate from internal CA , we need to get the certificate from service provider and install the same in both the ISE servers
Can anybody explain the procedure to opt the public certificate for HTTPS from service provider ? And how do i install it in both the ISE servers ?

Hi there. Let me try answering your questions:
PSN HA: The PSNs are not configured as "primary" or "secondary" inside your ISE deployment. They are just PSN nodes as far as ISE is concerned. Instead, inside your NADs (In your case WLCs) you can specify which PSN is primary, which one is secondary, etc. You can accomplish this by:
1. Defining all PSN nodes as AAA radius servers inside the WLC
2. Then under the SSID > AAA Servers Tab, you can list the AAA servers in the order that you prefer. As a result, the WLC will always use the first server listed until that server fails/gets reloaded, etc.
3. As a result, you can have one WLC or SSID prefer PSN server A (located in primary DC) while a second WLC or SSID prefer PSN server B (located in backup DC)
Last but not the least, you could also place PSNs behind a load balancer and that way the traffic would be equally distributed between multiple PSNs. However, the PSN nodes must be Layer 2 adjacent, which is probably not the case if they are located in two different Data Centers
Certificates: Yes, you would want to get a public certificate to service the guest portal. Getting a public/well known certificate would ensure that most devices out there would trust the CA that signed your ISE certificate. For instance, VeriSign, GoDaddy, Entrust are some of the ones out there that would work just fine. On the other hand, if you use a certificate that was signed by your internal CA, then things would be fine for your internal endpoints that trust your internal CA but for any outsiders (Guests, contractors, etc) that do not trust and do not know who your internal CA is would get a certificate error when being redirected to the ISE guest portal. This in general is only a "cosmetic" issue and if the users click "continue" and add your CA as a trusted authority, the guest page would load and the session would work. However, most users out there would not feel safe to proceed and you will most likely get a lot of calls to your helpdesk :)
I hope this helps!
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

Starting deployment prerequisites: error in BI-Java installation sapinst

Hi all,
We are in process updating Bw 3.5 to BI 7.0 we hace sucessfully completed the Upgrade but while installing Bi java thru Sapinst in third step like java instance installtion i was stck with the below error.
We have downloaded the Cryptographic file and placed in jdk folder still the same problem is coming.
Please suggest...
Thanks,
Subhash.G
Starting deployment prerequisites:
Oct 13, 2007 2:42:18 AM Error: Creation of DataSource for database "BWQ" failed.
Original error message is:
com.sap.sql.log.OpenSQLException: Error while accessing secure store: Encryption or decryption is not possible because the full version of the SAP Java Crypto Toolkit was not found (iaik_jce.jar is required, iaik_jce_export.jar is not sufficient) or the JCE Jurisdiction Policy Files don't allow the use of the "PbeWithSHAAnd3_KeyTripleDES_CBC" algorithm..
Stack trace of original Exception or Error is:
com.sap.sql.log.OpenSQLException: Error while accessing secure store: Encryption or decryption is not possible because the full version of the SAP Java Crypto Toolkit was not found (iaik_jce.jar is required, iaik_jce_export.jar is not sufficient) or the JCE Jurisdiction Policy Files don't allow the use of the "PbeWithSHAAnd3_KeyTripleDES_CBC" algorithm..

Problem solved followed the notes 1063396.

ISE Profiling Deployment

We are starting a ISE deployment to segregate mobile devices (Iphones and IPads, initially) from corporate notebooks. We have a single SSID and two separate vlans, one for mobile devices and another for corporate notebooks, assigned by ISE. We successfully setup profiling in lab environment, with a few devices, but when we put in production we had problems with devices not being profiled correctly. Since devices are not profiled their access are denied. Since devices are denied the cannot be profiled because ISE doesn´t see any traffic (DHCP, HTTP) from clients.
What strategy are you using to deploy ISE profiling? Must I put ISE to listen our network for some time before segregating access?

Hi
I've had the same problem with first time users being denied, that's due to ise not being able to profile before it denies.
I think they should come up with something that will profile devices then continue the authentication process.
Someone mentioned doing a re-auth for couple of seconds. (see attached pic how the authorization rule looks like), that could save you from people being denied for the first time, but if your device is never being profiled then it will just spin there all the time re-authenticating.
What you could do is also setup an unrouted VLAN and all the unknown devices stay there until profiled.
I've talked to cisco and they recommened the same thing so I guess that's it for now
What we have done before deploying ISE and it worked pretty good is I have forwarded all DHCP traffic to ISE before deploying ISE at that particular site, so DHCP forwarding ran for few days and I've already had their devices in my database and when I deployed it, it worked pretty neat
By forwarding all dhcp requests I mean:
We have Active Directory and DHCP servers centrally located, so in the router config I've added helper address to ISE ip address and that's it
Now WLC 7.3 has DHCP PROFILING and HTTP PROFILING options.
Http profiling sends first https packets to ISE and capturing USER-Agent string, that helps if you browse with safari, but if you use any other application that uses http traffic it will end up totally wrong.
example you connect with your iphone to wifi and open up VIBER, ISE will capture viber_blabla_smth as user agent and will not profile accurately.
Hope it helps

ISE 1.2 configuration issues

Fellow ISE users,
We are standing up a new ISE instance using ISE1.2 on VM's. We already have another one for a dedicated purpose on 1.1 and had no issues like what I am seeing here.
Issue one = unable to register nodes to the deployment, it keeps telling me to check server and CA certificate. I have loaded a CA cert from our internal microsoft CA server, same server I used in the other deployment and the servers accept it. Also when browsing to it https comes up with no errors so it seems to be working for https, not sure on EAP. Ideas?
Issue two = unable to find any groups in our AD a search brings back nothing. I was able to join it to our AD domain and it shows green, but none of the attempts to bring in a group have worked, again have done this a bunch with our 1.1 deployment so I know how it works. Ideas?
Anyway I do have a TAC case open on this but trying to get it resolved quickly due to some internation travel coming up where I will need deploy it.

Hi
When you deploy Cisco ISE in a standalone, or in a distributed environment for the first time, you are prompted to run the setup utility to configure the Cisco ISE appliance. Here, you will configure the Domain Name System (DNS) domain and the primary nameserver (primary DNS server), where you can configure one primary nameserver, and one or more nameservers during setup. You can also change, or add DNS nameservers later after deploying Cisco ISE using the CLI commands. For more information please go through this link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.1.1/user_guide/ise_ug.pdf

Cisco ISE Guest Portal - DNS Issue - External Zone

Hello,
I have a customer that has the following sceanrio :
In a wireless deployment and a Cisco ISE 1.1.3 deployment with CWA, when the wireless guest receives the redictect URL from ISE (URL to access the ISE Guest Portal), this URL is based on the ISE DNS name, not on its IP address; so, the PC can't resolve this via DNS name since there is no DNS in the External zone (for guets) or by using the ISP DNS servers addresses provided by the DHCP server, and, so, it can't access the Guest Portal at all ;
I know that in trying to manually code the IP address - this does not work (ie in the CWA Authorization profile, the equivalent URL redirect via the CISCO av-pair as follows :
cisco-av-pair=url-redirect=https://10.10.10.10:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionId=sessionIdValue&action=cwa, )
since the sessionIdValue variable is not replaced by its real value when sent to the wireless client)
My question is : Has this issue been addressed in version Cisco ISE 1.2 - has anyone tried it if has been addressed? If not in Cisco 1.2 - does anyone know iof this feature will become available?
Thank-you in advance for your replies.
Robert C.

Robert,
Manual assignment has been made available in ISE 1.2 release.
M.

Ise distributed deployment upgrade

My customer has an ISE deployment with 4 nodes: Admin/Monitor Primary and Secondary plus 2 Policy Server. The Admin nodes are VMs, the Policy nodes are 3315 appliances.
The system was installed almost three years ago with the version 1.1.0 ... It appears the system never had issues so never was patched or upgraded. Why fix something that is working fine?
Today there was an issue because the certificates expired, so in the review to get the system up and running again, the update issue bring on to the conversation. We like to do an upgrade to the last supported version. So I wonder for some tips and ideas to take care for planning the upgrade.
I have some doubts:
Can the 3315 appliance support the release 1.3 without issues?
I know the upgrade procedure is basically installing a .tar file, but I'm not clear how the process in a distributed deployment should be. I had run upgrades in standalone systems, but never in a distributed deployment. So, I need to upgrade the Primary Admin only and the other nodes would upgrade automatically?
I would need to upgrade 1.1 to 1.2 first and then 1.2 to 1.3?
I undertand release 1.1 was in 32 bits, and the version 1.2 and 1.3 are in 64 bits, so I guess the process would take a long time (perhaps a couple of hours), so a maintenance window would need 3 or 4 hours until the full system became stable.
Can you give me some advice and suggestions to avoid major issues?
Regards.
Daniel Escalante.

Can you give me some advice and suggestions to avoid major issues?
Documents related to upgarde were given by Venkatesh refer those. Along with that additional information.
Can the 3315 appliance support the release 1.3 without issues?
Cisco ISE-3315-K9 (small) 3
Supports ISE 1.3
Any
1x Xeon 2.66-GHz quad-core processor
4 GB RAM
2 x 250 GB SATA4 HDD5
4x 1 GB NIC6
I know the upgrade procedure is basically installing a .tar file, but I'm not clear how the process in a distributed deployment should be. I had run upgrades in standalone systems, but never in a distributed deployment. So, I need to upgrade the Primary Admin only and the other nodes would upgrade automatically?
When upgrading to Cisco ISE, Release 1.2, first upgrade the secondary Administration node to Release 1.2. You do not have to manually deregister the node before an upgrade. Use the application upgrade command to upgrade nodes to Release 1.2. The upgrade process deregisters the node automatically and moves it to the new deployment. If you manually deregister the node before an upgrade, ensure that you have the license file for the Primary Administration node before beginning the upgrade process. If you do not have the file on hand (if your license was installed by a Cisco partner vendor, for example), contact the Cisco Technical Assistance Center for assistance.
I would need to upgrade 1.1 to 1.2 first and then 1.2 to 1.3? I undertand release 1.1 was in 32 bits, and the version 1.2 and 1.3 are in 64 bits, so I guess the process would take a long time (perhaps a couple of hours), so a maintenance window would need 3 or 4 hours until the full system became stable
If you are on a version earlier than Cisco ISE, Release 1.2, you must first upgrade to 1.2 and then to 1.3.
You can upgrade to Cisco ISE, Release 1.2, from any of the following releases:
Cisco ISE, Release 1.1.0.665 (or 1.1.0 with the latest patch applied)
Cisco ISE, Release 1.1.1.268 (or 1.1.1 with the latest patch applied)
Cisco ISE, Release 1.1.2, with the latest patch applied
Cisco ISE, Release 1.1.3, with the latest patch applied
Cisco ISE, Release 1.1.4, with the latest patch applied
Type of Deployment
Node Persona
Time Taken for Upgrade
Standalone (2000 endpoints)
Administration, Policy Service, Monitoring
1 hour 20 minutes
Distributed (25,000 users and 250,000 endpoints)
Secondary Administration
2 hours
Monitoring
1.5 hours
After upgrading to ISE 1.2, upgrade to ISE 1.3
Type of Deployment
Node Persona
Time Taken for Upgrade
Standalone (2000 endpoints)
Administration, Policy Service, Monitoring
1 hour 20 minutes
Distributed (25,000 users and 250,000 endpoints)
Secondary Administration
2 hours
Monitoring
1.5 hours
Factors That Affect Upgrade Time
Number of endpoints in your network
Number of users and guest users in your network
Profiling service, if enabled

ISE Distributed Deployment

Hi All,
Deploying multiple PSN's with a distributed deployment, do all the PSN's have to be in the same domain? I have 8 set up in one domain, and would like to run a few more through firewalls and using a different dns domain.
Also interested to see how AD integration works with this. I'd still expect to join the nodes to the common AD domain. Would they be able to join an AD domain which isn't linked with their FQDN?
I'm hoping that running the other policy nodes on an external domain, I can use a standard CSR for the external public certs.
All comments, suggestions, spoliers welcomed! Question is out to Cisco but I know the value of these forums too.

Hi,
You will have to join all ISE nodes to the same AD domain since the policy for user enforcement (for any external conditions) is configured at the Primary Admin node and replicated down to the PSNs. However, if you choose to configure a different dns domain for one PSN and then join it to the command AD domain, the only issue I see with this is SAMAccount name being sent in the username and not the UPN.
If a user requests authentication with johndoe and your AD domain is abc.com but your dns domain is def.com, then ISE will try to authenticate [email protected] (from my experience), there have been some improvements where ISE should be able to note that this is an authentication request and should suffix the request with [email protected] but I am not 100 percent sure.
If you have a cisco account rep (with your deployment size I am absolute sure you do) have them ping the BU on this issue and see what the official response is.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

NAC Agent Login Dialog Not Appearing - ISE 1.1.1 issue ?

Agent Fails to Initiate Posture Assessment
The NAC agent is properly installed on a Windoes 7 , IE 9 machine, the certificates from ISE ADM PRI are installed in trustable certificate store in the client machine but is a selfsigned ISE certificate.
The reports / USER / Profiling report says the Provisioning Agent has completed the assessment ok.
The redirected URL is working fine (SEE Evidence)
We are always prompted to install the NAC agent again or looking at the additional prompted information wait for the NAC agent to load and complete.
The operations status remains with postering status pending forever and nothing else happens.
Symptoms or Issue
The agent login dialog box does not appear to the user following client provisioning.
Conditions Cisco Says this issue can generally take place during the posture assessment phase of any user
authentication session.
Cisco Advises as Possible Causes There are multiple possible causes for this type of issue. See the following
Resolution descriptions for details of what was already tested by us and please see the atached files for your switch configuration and evidences. .
CISCO SUGGESTED POSSIBLE CAUSES AND RESOLUTIONS
Resolution • Ensure that the agent is running on the client machine. ALL TESTED OK
• Ensure that the Cisco IOS release on the switch is equal to or more recent than
Cisco IOS Release 12.2.(53)SE. - OK
• Ensure that the discovery host address on the Cisco NAC agent or Mac OS X
agent is pointing to the Cisco ISE FQDN. (Right-click on the NAC agent icon,
choose Properties, and check the discovery host.) - OK (See evidence)
• Ensure that the access switch allows Swiss communication between Cisco ISE
and the end client machine. Limited access ACL applied for the session should
allow Swiss ports: ALL CONFIGURED as CISCO GUIDELINES OK (SEE EVIDENCE)
• If the agent login dialog still does not appear, it could be a certificate issue.
Ensure that the certificate that is used for Swiss communication on the end client
is in the Cisco ISE certificate trusted list. (ALL CHECKED OK SEE EVIDENCE)
• Ensure that the default gateway is reachable from the client machine. (TESTED OK)

Hi.
Can you paste all the ACLs on your switch especially the webauth redirect ACL which should deny traffic towards the PSN.
regards
Zubair

ISE 1.3 certificate issue

Hi experts,
I have tried to replicate an issue that my customer is having:
issue: when running client provisioning on default port 8905, the portal certificate shows that it's using the certificate created for the Admin. However, when visiting guest portal or running onboarding process (using port 8443 which is the default one), the certificate is presented with the correct one (the one used for the portal).
Here is what I have setup in my lab:
1. in ISE 1.3, installed two certificate: one for admin and the other for portal access:
2. when accessing the admin page and the client portal, I can see that it's using the correct certificate. ( the OU=ESC one is the admin certificate and the OU=MS one is the portal certificate)
However, when accessing the test client provisioning portal on 8905, the certificate shows it's using the admin one:
In the adminstration->device portal mgmt->client provisioning portal, the port is used as default 8443. It makes more sense it uses the client provisioning certificate rather than the admin certificate when the portal is redirected on to port 8905.
Is the issue an as-designed feature or is there additional configuration needs to be implemented?

Hello Neno,
Thanks for the reply!
Let me clarify: when I access the client provisioning portal on default 8443 which URL is generated by the ISE, I can see the correct certificate (OU=MS) is presented. But when I manually change the port from 8443 to 8905 in the same URL and access, ISE brings me to the same portal page, but this time the incorrect certificate is presented (OU=ESC which I generated for the admin portal).
So it seems that ISE presents a wrong certificate (the one for admin) when user is redirected to the provisioning portal on a port other than port 8443. I believe ISE should present the portal certificate usage in this case. I am not sure if this is an as-designed feature, or some additional configuration should be done.
Let me know if you still have questions with this.
Many thanks,

5760 WLC & ISE 1.2 PEAP Issues

I have the following setup:
WLC 5508 (7.4.100)
WLC 5760 (03.03.02) (I'm replacing the 5508 with the 5760)
ISE 1.2
Im currently running 802.1x PEAP with external AD authentication, on the 5508 and everything is working 100%.
As soon as I switch the users over to the 5760 I get the following errors on the ISE:
Event
5440 Endpoint abandoned EAP session and started new
Failure Reason
5440 Endpoint abandoned EAP session and started new
Resolution
Verify known NAD or supplicant issues and published bugs. Verify NAD and supplicant configuration.
Root cause
Endpoint started new authentication while previous is still in progress. Most probable that supplicant on that endpoint stopped conducting the previous authentication and started the new one. Closing the previous authentication.
I took the config of a working 5760, why would this one give the above errors ?
Jaco

Hello!
Turn on debugs on your 5760 to track authentication activities. Most probably you'll spot the issue from them. If not - post them here, so we'll have a look as well.
Thanks, Irina

ISE Guest deployment

Hi
Im setting up a ISE (1.3) in distributed deployment with a primary and secondary node.
Both nodes are running admin and PSN role.
The 2 nodes are up and running and synchronised, and now i want to set up a CWA guest solution.
So my question is:
In case I need to do a failover to the secondary node how do we need to do the DNS registration of the portal url ?
Do I have to have a uniqe url for each ISE or do I need to set up the DNS pointing to both of the ip addresses that is set up on the interface of the ise that is used for the guest portal.
And also a seperate public cert on each ISE pointing to the CN ?
Hope my question was understandable :)

Redundancy for the sponsor portal falls into two categories. With load-balancers and without load-balancers. In both two node environments and and more than two nodes the design is the same.
With network loadbalancers you simply create a VIP for port 8443 and use the PSNs as member servers. Then simply configure the DNS hostname that is configured in the sponsor portal to the VIP.
The other options are DNS based. You can simply have two A records for the sponsor.example.com and DNS will naturally round robin between the records. The last option is to use a DNS load-balancer to accomplish the same task as the round robin, but with more control over which record is used when.
As for the cert the recommendation for using loadbalancers is to have a shared cert on all of your PSNs. the cert should contain both the FQDN of the sponsor portal and the hostnames of all of your PSNs if you are planning on using the same cert for EAP and not just HTTPS.
Here is the documentation on how to use F5 Big IP load-balancers
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/how_to/HowTo-95-Cisco_and_F5_Deployment_Guide-ISE_Load_Balancing_Using_BIG-IP.pdf

GroupWise 2012 Deployment Bundle Issue - Not Installing

Hello There,
I have an issue to deploy the GroupWise 2012 client via Zen 11.1 (Had no prob to deploy GroupWise 8)
I followed the well-done tutorial from youtube (Novell GroupWise 2012 Deployed Using ZCM 11 SP1 Part 1 - YouTube) or/and the guide (http://www.novell.com/feeds/nih/wp-c...5/GW06_lab.pdf) but it seems that it does not want to work as shown. I googled to see if anyone had the same prob but it seems not to be the case. So I assume I missed something but I do not find the trick.
Everything works until it launches the install.bat as when I get the notification that it has completed the installation the only thing I see is that no GroupWise 2012 is installed at all and that GroupWise 8 has been uninstalled. During the process I see that it copies the first 800 files in Program Files\novell\groupwise but just before telling me that he finished all files are removed. I did not do the step where it should launch GroupWise.
I re-created a bundles and tried to install GroupWise 2012 as GroupWise 8 but it did not work.
It is really frustrating as I really need it to be deployed and that it was meant to be simple.
I would be grateful if anyone could help on that.
Thank you in advance,
OAKFND
PS: Here is a part of the log on the workstation
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.906] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [LaunchActionHandler] [] [Exiting ProcessAction] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.906] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [Action handler Launch Action finished processing Launch GroupWise Installation successfully.] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [Caching action set 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [Caching work set GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade (INSTALL)] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionSet count: 7] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionResult count: 6] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName): b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName): b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [ Using session id: b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f 99, UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM; _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.937] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject returning True in 4 ms] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.937] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) PutObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99, UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM; _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.937] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [Type: Novell.Zenworks.ActionManager.WorkSet] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) PutObject returning C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\cache\zmd\ZenCache\3b17bbd3-f015-4c92-a7e0-c337a893ab0f in 10 ms] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [Cached workset GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade as WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [Processing action: Delete GroupWise2012 Directory] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [Caching action set 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [Caching work set GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade (INSTALL)] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionSet count: 7] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionResult count: 7] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName): b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName): b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [ Using session id: b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f 99, UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM; _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject returning True in 5 ms] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) PutObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99, UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM; _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [Type: Novell.Zenworks.ActionManager.WorkSet] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) PutObject returning C:\Program Files\Novell\ZENworks\cache\zmd\ZenCache\d4bb83fe-6151-42fe-9656-c2c35f55c0d2 in 9 ms] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [Cached workset GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade as WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [Updating status for set 4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [Work set completed. Deleting cached action set 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [Deleting work set GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade (INSTALL)] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName): b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f 99, UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM; _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject returning True in 4 ms] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManUtil] [] [DestroyDauSession countdown reset to 500000 milliseconds for session 6088812] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ActionManager] [] [GetResultSetRequest returning DO_NOTHING] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [Status Library] [] [SetStatus: srchSql= select successcount, failurecount from zstatus where userguid = '' and objectguid = '5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9' and operationtype = 'Bundle.Install'] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [Status Library] [] [SetStatus: sql= insert into zstatus(timestamp, userguid, objectguid, source, objecttype, operationtype, operationstatus, successcount, failurecount, objectversion ) values ( 634829756180156250,'','5c2142000453e9b1159e677b045 77dd9',1,'B','Bundle.Install','S',6,1,0)] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [ZIconMod] [] [Received exception closing the activityIndicator to user session (999): Failed to connect to an IPC Port: The system cannot find the file specified.
Server stack trace:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Ipc.IpcPort.Conne ct(String portName, Boolean secure, TokenImpersonationLevel impersonationLevel, Int32 timeout)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Ipc.ConnectionCac he.GetConnection(String portName, Boolean secure, TokenImpersonationLevel level, Int32 timeout)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Ipc.IpcClientTran sportSink.ProcessMessage(IMessage msg, ITransportHeaders requestHeaders, Stream requestStream, ITransportHeaders& responseHeaders, Stream& responseStream)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.BinaryClientForma tterSink.SyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg)
Exception rethrown at (0):
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleRe turnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateI nvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
at Novell.Zenworks.NotifyIcon.Remoting.IZenIconUIServ er.CloseActivityIndicator(String guid, String status, String name)
at Novell.Zenworks.NotifyIcon.Module.ZenNotifyIcon.Cl oseActivityIndicator(Session session, String guid, String status, String name)] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] [] [BundleManager] [] [Finished Process Action for Item: GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade Action: INSTALL Result: True] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.109] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [BundleManager] [] [From IconUtils.cs)] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.109] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [BundleManager] [] [Required icon found, sending for overlay] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [BundleManager] [] [Evaluating System Requirements for GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade; GUID: 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [Requirement Handler] [] [Comparing actualValue: 5.1.2600.196608 with expectedValue: 5.1.2600.196608 for compareOperator: GreaterEquals returned True] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [Requirements Module] [] [First requirement returned True] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [ArchitectureRequirementHandler] [] [Got architecture - 32] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [ArchitectureRequirementHandler] [] [Expecting architecture - 32] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [ArchitectureRequirementHandler] [] [Returning - True] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [Requirements Module] [] [AND-ing result(True) with previous results (True) yields True] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [Requirements Module] [] [First requirement returned True] [] []
[DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25] [] [BundleManager] [] [System Requirements Passed for GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade] [] []

I don't have GW for any type of testing, but what I would do for testing
is .......
Replace the Install.bat with just calling CMD.exe
then from the command prompt
walk through the commands in the install.bat one by one to see what is
happening............
On 9/11/2012 12:06 PM, OakFND wrote:
>
> Hello There,
>
> I have an issue to deploy the GroupWise 2012 client via Zen 11.1 (Had
> no prob to deploy GroupWise 8)
>
> I followed the well-done tutorial from youtube ('Novell GroupWise 2012
> Deployed Using ZCM 11 SP1 Part 1 - YouTube'
> (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9Wa2ETf7ag)) or/and the guide
> (http://www.novell.com/feeds/nih/wp-c...5/GW06_lab.pdf)
> but it seems that it does not want to work as shown. I googled to see if
> anyone had the same prob but it seems not to be the case. So I assume I
> missed something but I do not find the trick.
>
> Everything works until it launches the install.bat as when I get the
> notification that it has completed the installation the only thing I see
> is that no GroupWise 2012 is installed at all and that GroupWise 8 has
> been uninstalled. During the process I see that it copies the first 800
> files in Program Files\novell\groupwise but just before telling me that
> he finished all files are removed. I did not do the step where it should
> launch GroupWise.
>
> I re-created a bundles and tried to install GroupWise 2012 as GroupWise
> 8 but it did not work.
>
> It is really frustrating as I really need it to be deployed and that it
> was meant to be simple.
>
> I would be grateful if anyone could help on that.
> Thank you in advance,
> OAKFND
>
> PS: Here is a part of the log on the workstation
>
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.906] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9] []
> [LaunchActionHandler] [] [Exiting ProcessAction] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.906] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [Action handler Launch Action finished processing
> Launch GroupWise Installation successfully.] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [Caching action set
> 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [Caching work set GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade
> (INSTALL)] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionSet count: 7] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionResult count: 6] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName):
> b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName):
> b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [ Using session id: b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa]
> [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.921] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9)
> DeleteObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f 99,
> UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM;
> _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.937] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject returning True in 4 ms] [] []
>
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.937] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9)
> PutObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99,
> UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM;
> _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.937] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [Type: Novell.Zenworks.ActionManager.WorkSet] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) PutObject returning C:\Program
> Files\Novell\ZENworks\cache\zmd\ZenCache\3b17bbd3-f015-4c92-a7e0-c337a893ab0f
> in 10 ms] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [Cached workset GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade
> as WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [Processing action: Delete GroupWise2012
> Directory] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [Caching action set
> 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [Caching work set GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade
> (INSTALL)] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.953] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionSet count: 7] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [ ActionResult count: 7] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName):
> b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName):
> b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [ Using session id: b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa]
> [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9)
> DeleteObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f 99,
> UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM;
> _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject returning True in 5 ms] [] []
>
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9)
> PutObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99,
> UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM;
> _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.968] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [Type: Novell.Zenworks.ActionManager.WorkSet] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) PutObject returning C:\Program
> Files\Novell\ZENworks\cache\zmd\ZenCache\d4bb83fe-6151-42fe-9656-c2c35f55c0d2
> in 9 ms] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [Cached workset GroupWise 2012 Installation or Upgrade
> as WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [Updating status for set
> 4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f99] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [Work set completed. Deleting cached action set
> 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [Deleting work set GroupWise 2012 Installation or
> Upgrade (INSTALL)] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [WorkSet] [] [WorkSet using session id (ZenName):
> b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9)
> DeleteObject(WorkSet4c7cc2c6e2cbf85974fdc7eb690c1f 99,
> UserContext{_LocalId=SYSTEM;
> _RemoteId=b683416a643739f118900002b3dfe2fa}) called] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZenCache] [] [(Thread 9) DeleteObject returning True in 4 ms] [] []
>
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManUtil] [] [DestroyDauSession countdown reset to 500000
> milliseconds for session 6088812] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:37.984] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ActionManager] [] [GetResultSetRequest returning DO_NOTHING] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [Status Library] [] [SetStatus: srchSql= select successcount,
> failurecount from zstatus where userguid = '' and objectguid =
> '5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9' and operationtype = 'Bundle.Install']
> [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [Status Library] [] [SetStatus: sql= insert into zstatus(timestamp,
> userguid, objectguid, source, objecttype, operationtype,
> operationstatus, successcount, failurecount, objectversion ) values (
> 634829756180156250,'','5c2142000453e9b1159e677b045 77dd9',1,'B','Bundle.Install','S',6,1,0)]
> [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [ZIconMod] [] [Received exception closing the activityIndicator to
> user session (999): Failed to connect to an IPC Port: The system cannot
> find the file specified.
>
>
> Server stack trace:
> at System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Ipc.IpcPort.Conne ct(String
> portName, Boolean secure, TokenImpersonationLevel impersonationLevel,
> Int32 timeout)
> at
> System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Ipc.ConnectionCac he.GetConnection(String
> portName, Boolean secure, TokenImpersonationLevel level, Int32 timeout)
> at
> System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Ipc.IpcClientTran sportSink.ProcessMessage(IMessage
> msg, ITransportHeaders requestHeaders, Stream requestStream,
> ITransportHeaders& responseHeaders, Stream& responseStream)
> at
> System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.BinaryClientForma tterSink.SyncProcessMessage(IMessage
> msg)
>
> Exception rethrown at (0):
> at
> System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleRe turnMessage(IMessage
> reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
> at
> System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateI nvoke(MessageData&
> msgData, Int32 type)
> at
> Novell.Zenworks.NotifyIcon.Remoting.IZenIconUIServ er.CloseActivityIndicator(String
> guid, String status, String name)
> at
> Novell.Zenworks.NotifyIcon.Module.ZenNotifyIcon.Cl oseActivityIndicator(Session
> session, String guid, String status, String name)] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.015] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [9]
> [] [BundleManager] [] [Finished Process Action for Item: GroupWise 2012
> Installation or Upgrade Action: INSTALL Result: True] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.109] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [BundleManager] [] [From IconUtils.cs)] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.109] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [BundleManager] [] [Required icon found, sending for overlay] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [BundleManager] [] [Evaluating System Requirements for GroupWise 2012
> Installation or Upgrade; GUID: 5c2142000453e9b1159e677b04577dd9] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [Requirement Handler] [] [Comparing actualValue: 5.1.2600.196608 with
> expectedValue: 5.1.2600.196608 for compareOperator: GreaterEquals
> returned True] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [Requirements Module] [] [First requirement returned True] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [ArchitectureRequirementHandler] [] [Got architecture - 32] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [ArchitectureRequirementHandler] [] [Expecting architecture - 32] []
> []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [ArchitectureRequirementHandler] [] [Returning - True] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [Requirements Module] [] [AND-ing result(True) with previous results
> (True) yields True] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [Requirements Module] [] [First requirement returned True] [] []
> [DEBUG] [09/11/2012 17:53:38.125] [400] [ZenworksWindowsService] [25]
> [] [BundleManager] [] [System Requirements Passed for GroupWise 2012
> Installation or Upgrade] [] []
>
>
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

AIA Deploying Artifacts issue

Hi,
here i am tring to Deploying AIA Artifacts by following bellow script:
ant -f /usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/Infrastructure/Install/AID/AIAInstallDriver.xml -DPropertiesFile=/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/aia_instances/AIA30/config/AIAInstallProperties.xml -DDeploymentPlan=/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/services/AIAProDP.xml
But i face below error and my SOA server also running statu..
[exec] Problem invoking WLST - Traceback (innermost last):
[exec] File "/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/Infrastructure/Install/AID/lib/py/updateMetadata.py", line 24, in ?
[exec] at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
[exec] at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
[exec] at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
[exec] at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
[exec]
[exec] java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error connecting to server please check to see if the server exists
[exec]
BUILD FAILED
/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/Infrastructure/Install/AID/AIAExecuteDriver.xml:104: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/Infrastructure/Install/AID/AIAExecuteDriver.xml:65: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/aia_instances/AIA30/tmp/AIDExecuteDP_temp_1229734324.xml:7: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/app/oracle/product/ECO/EcoAIA/Infrastructure/Install/AID/lib/AIDConfigurationLibraryTasks.xml:845: exec returned: 1
please help me on this issue is their any changes neede in AIDConfigurationLibraryTasks.xml
Thanku,
Ram
Edited by: 969014 on May 30, 2013 4:37 AM

Hi Ram,
If you were deploying the artifacts using AID, make sure that the AIDInstallerProperties.xml is properly configured with password/server details for the involved system(s).
During deployment time, AID gets server details from that file and connects to it.
Else, retry configuring this xml file using AIA's config.sh
Thanks,
Harikiran

WebLogic 10.2 Annotation Override/Deployment Plan Issue

We're migrating applications from WLS 9.2.1 over to 10.2. When we create the deployment plan and configure the overrides we find that some of the web service controls overrides are ignored and the defaults are used.
This was not an issue for 9.2.1 and I've not been able to find any information about this.
Has anyone experienced this before?
Chris

This issue turned out to be a missing target during the ant build process.

ISE HA Deployment prerequisite issue.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for