ISE upgrade issue

Trying to upgrade from 1.1.1.268 patch 5 to 1.1.2.145. It fails saying the package isn't correct format via GUI. Tried via CLI and I see this in the logs.
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[245] [<removed>]: Install initiated with bundle - ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz, repo - Patches
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[259] [<removed>]: Stage area - /storeddata/Installing/.1357237542
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[263] [<removed>]: Getting bundle to local machine
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: transfer: cars_xfer.c[54] [<removed>]: ftp copy in of ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz requested
Jan 3 18:26:12 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[272] [<removed>]: Got bundle at - /storeddata/Installing/.1357237542/ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz
Jan 3 18:26:12 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[282] [<removed>]: Unbundling package ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[294] [<removed>]: Unbundling done. Verifying input parameters...
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[316] [<removed>]: Manifest file is at - /storeddata/Installing/.1357237542/manifest.xml
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[326] [<removed>]: Manifest file appname - ise
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[364] [<removed>]: Patch bundle contains patch((null)) for app version(1.1.2.145)
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[367] [<removed>]: Patch for application version (1.1.2.145) is not matching the installed app version
Jan 3 18:26:53 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install install_cli.c[691] [<removed>]: error message: Patch cannot be applied to the installed application version.
Jan 3 18:26:53 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install install_cli.c[694] [<removed>]: Error while Installing - Patch bundle: ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz Repository: Patches ErrorCode: -623 Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[245] [<removed>]: Install initiated with bundle - ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz, repo - Patches
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[259] [<removed>]: Stage area - /storeddata/Installing/.1357237542
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[263] [<removed>]: Getting bundle to local machine
Jan 3 18:25:42 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: transfer: cars_xfer.c[54] [<removed>]: ftp copy in of ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz requested
Jan 3 18:26:12 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[272] [<removed>]: Got bundle at - /storeddata/Installing/.1357237542/ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz
Jan 3 18:26:12 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[282] [<removed>]: Unbundling package ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[294] [<removed>]: Unbundling done. Verifying input parameters...
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[316] [<removed>]: Manifest file is at - /storeddata/Installing/.1357237542/manifest.xml
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[326] [<removed>]: Manifest file appname - ise
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[364] [<removed>]: Patch bundle contains patch((null)) for app version(1.1.2.145)
Jan 3 18:26:52 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install cars_install.c[367] [<removed>]: Patch for application version (1.1.2.145) is not matching the installed app version
Jan 3 18:26:53 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install install_cli.c[691] [<removed>]: error message: Patch cannot be applied to the installed application version.
Jan 3 18:26:53 oranetise02 debugd[2507]: [22327]: application:install install_cli.c[694] [<removed>]: Error while Installing - Patch bundle: ise-appbundle-1.1.2.145.i386.tar.gz Repository: Patches ErrorCode: -623

To avoid contratictory fixes. Essentially, with patch 5 you aply a fix. Upgrade to 1.1.2 removes it (or even worse case leaves orphaned files etc. since it does not know about the fix) and then patch 2 applies it back. It will work fine as long as the "fix" is exactly the same. That assumption can be wrong.
Even the release notes were made to reflect that an upgrade to 1.1.2 requires you to be at 1.1.1 patch 3.

Similar Messages

Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

Hi,
I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
4. DAC upgrade issues??
any response for my questions is appreciated.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

HI Jay,
We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
Award points it is useful.
Thanks,
satya

Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi. Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore. What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work. Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem. This is a picture of the code.
BJD1613
Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
Philips Respironics
Certified LV Architect / Instructor
Attachments:
code.JPG ‏92 KB

Hi BJD1613,
The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.
This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

Hi,
Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
Error log:
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.
Portal Upgrade Issue
Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Srinivas
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

Issue resolved

Upgrade issues list needed

Hi,
We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
Some points i shortlisted are :
1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
aRs

Check the below links
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Venkatesh, Suma
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

Duplicate thread ...
R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

Hi Basis Expert,
while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and find the forum but no luck.
Thanks

Hi,
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
>
It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
Thanks
Sunny
Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

ISE certifiacte issue

Hi,
I have a ISE certifiacte issue when I try to authenticate wireless user with ISE. He show me this:
12321 PEAP failed SSL/TLS handshake because the client rejected the ISE local-certificate12321 PEAP failed SSL/TLS handshake because the client rejected the ISE local-certificate
Please can you help me?
Regards
Aristide

This pretty much means that the authenticating client is not trusting the certificate that is installed in ISE. That certificate is used to build the EAP tunnel that would be used to pass the PEAP credentials. So a couple of questions:
1. What certificate do you have installed in ISE for EAP?
2. What certificate is the supplicant set to trust

Upgrade issues list

Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had a list of Upgrade issues (most likely, from ticketting system) to the 5.0 system.
Thanks

Hi mark,
Can u please send me the upgrade issue list to this email address
[email protected]

IDSM-2 - upgrade issue - 5.x to 6.x

Hello All,
I have an issue upgrading the IDSM-2 module I'm playing with.
It is currently running version 5.0(2).
The thing is when I try to upgrade the image to the latest 6.x version using the .bin.gz file, I get the follwing error message :
The filename IPS-IDSM2-K9-sys-1.1-a-6.1-2-E3.bin.gz is not a valid upgrade file type.
Continue with upgrade? []:
There is no image file that is not .bin.gz on the download section of the website. Only recovery images have the .pkg extension.
Does anybody how to troubleshoot this simple(I guess) upgrade issue?
Regards,
Thibault.

You are trying to "upgrade" using a "System Image" (-sys-) file instead of an Upgrade file.
The upgrade file for the IDSM-2 is the standard upgrade file used across almost all IPS/IDS models:
IPS-K9-6.1-2-E3.pkg
It can be downloaded here:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ips6

Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

LTGee -
I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
Thanks!
Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

CPP - NAC agent upgrade issue - NAC to ISE migration

Hi,
I am currently working on a project to migraate NAC to ISE. Existing version of NACagent running on client macine is 4.8.2.1. CPP is pushing upgarde to required version 4.9.4.3. I can't locate upgrade matrix for this version. Could anyone guide me on this?

You can directly download the nac agent 4.9.4.3 from the below download link
http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283801620&softwareid=283802505&release=1.2&flowid=26081

ISE 1.3 upgrade issue

Dears,
We upgraded from 1.2.1 to 1.3 but many users can't get posture assessment and then stuck in quarantine state.
Any help

TAC advised there is a bug and we are waiting patch :(

Windows 8.1 upgrade issues on Satellite P870 - PSPLFA

Hi there,
For better or worse over the weekend I have downloaded windows 8.1 onto a toshiba laptop (p870 PSPLFA model) that was running windows 8. Video card is NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M 2GB with Optimus + Intel HD Graphics 4000
http://www.mytoshiba.com.au/support/computers/satellite/p870/psplfa-019001/specifications
couple of issues:
(a) I am having a few problems getting windows 8.1 to work properly on this laptop and can't get/find new drivers from the toshiba website to sort out the video card properly.
Any ideas of how or when I can download video drivers that are suitable for this laptop?
Not overly keen on uninstalling and rolling back to windows 8 now that I have gone this far...
I have a call in yesterday with microsoft yesterday that seems to be going nowhere to fix a couple of other things following this upgrade.
(b) On the windows 8.1 machine my internet connection when running IE11
now seems a bit flaky and suspect this is a internet explorer 11/windows 8.1 issue (other laptops on my wireless network running windows 7 and XP are working fine and not dropping out as well as can access all the info I can't on the win 8.1 machine) which seems to be a bit of a common issues looking at some other forums and
(c) I can't download or open files from google docs (screen just freezes most of the way through the download) on the upgraded windows 8.1 machine.
Any help appreciated,
Ken

Hi
Your notebook belongs to the PSPLFA series. This series was released in Australian
The same notebook series PSPLFE is available in Europe.
On the Toshiba EU driver page you will find all Win 8.1 update drivers
http://www.toshiba.eu/innovation/download_drivers_bios.jsp?service=EU
_Importnat:_ the Win 8.1 drivers have to be installed in the right order!
Check the installation instruction which is available in the driver list too and follow exact this order!

ISE upgrade issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for