Islamic organiser for the N95 model.

Could any one give me advice about the availability of the Islamic organizer for the Nokia N95, I have been using it on the Nokia 9300i and found it particularly useful. Any help to get this on to the Nokia N95 will be welcome.\
Thank you
Junaid

checke at this link
http://www.bestmobileworld.com/nokia-s60ver3-softwares/9/

Similar Messages

XML File not found for the Container model.cpx

I can run my application from JDeveloper without receiving the error. But when I deploy the application I get the following:
500 Internal Server Error
oracle.jbo.NoXMLFileException: JBO-26001: XML File not found for the Container model.cpx at oracle.jbo.mom.DefinitionManager.loadProjectDefinition(DefinitionManager.java:751) at oracle.jbo.uicli.mom.JUMetaObjectManager.createPool(JUMetaObjectManager.java:457) at oracle.jbo.http.HttpContainer.findSessionCookie(HttpContainer.java:541) at oracle.jbo.html.struts11.BC4JRequestProcessor.initPageFromPath(BC4JRequestProcessor.java:233) at oracle.jbo.html.struts11.BC4JRequestProcessor.processMapping(BC4JRequestProcessor.java:123) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:234) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1292) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:510) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:721) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:306) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:767) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:259) at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.3.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:106) at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:803) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
Any Ideas?

Hi,
please explicitly "make" the project. One reason for this problem could be that the model.cpx isn't created properly. Select the model project and compile the complete project before deploying it. Sometimes it helps to clear the "class" directory of the project on teh file system before re-compiling
Frank

Multiple DEVL_PROJECT_ID for the same model in CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS Table.

Hi,
Did anyone came across this issue!! I am triggering the config engine from back and and trying to pick up a model but it has multiple devl_project_id's. :(
I could see multiple DEVL_PROJECT_ID for the same model in CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS Table. Apart from DEVL_PROJECT_ID and created_by_date every thing looks the same.
Below are the 2 records the data from the table
select * from CZ.CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS where product_key = '122:17056' and DEVL_PROJECT_ID in (12943,15321)
DEVL_PROJECT_ID     NAME     ORIG_SYS_REF     CREATION_DATE     LAST_UPDATE_DATE     PERSISTENT_PROJECT_ID     MODEL_TYPE
12943     ASI XXX MODEL(122 17056)     OPTIONAL:122:17056     12/18/2012 10:01     12/18/2012 10:01     11100     A
PRODUCT_KEY     ORGANIZATION_ID     INVENTORY_ITEM_ID     BOM_CAPTION_RULE_ID     NONBOM_CAPTION_RULE_ID
122:17056     122     17056     802     801
15321     ASI XXX MODEL(122 17056)     OPTIONAL:122:17056     12/26/2012 23:10     12/26/2012 23:10     11100     A
122:17056     122     17056     802     801
Thanks in advance,
-vijay

It can be possible to have multiple devl_project_id for the same model in cz_devl_projects Table.
Case -1 : When you delete the existing model and re-import again.
case 2:
When you publish the model locally, it will create the same copy of the record with different devl_project_id, creation_date, last update_date etc..\
You can see that for published records the last_updat_login, checkout_user will be null and for the original model, last_update_login,checkout_user (if model is locked) will not be null.
-Murali
Edited by: 907569 on Jan 8, 2013 10:55 AM

Get a Samsung HDTV and ATV or wait for the latest model?

A newbie to HDTV, video and ATV.
I have almost decided to buy the Samsung 50" plasma HDTV PN50A650. But have discovered that Samsung has a new model PN50A760 with added capabilities for playing video and wireless networking.
Connectivity is an issue to me. Spending all the green on a HDTV, I do not want it to be obsolete in 4 years. What if I get a digital camcorder? Or Apple introduces a flat-rate movie-rental scheme? My options:
OPTION A) Wait a few months until the $500 premium for the new model drops.
Some excerpts for reviews of the latest 760 model:
"The 7 series can playback video content stored on a USB device while the 6 series are limited to images and audio."
(Naively, I thought that all HDTVs should be able to play back video.)
"The 7 Series can stream audio, video and pictures over your home network."
"The TV recognizes not only MP3 and JPEG files but also XviD and MPEG4 files to enjoy video playback."
"The TV can also reach out to your home network and play back photos, videos and music stored on networked computers. You'll need to install special software, included with the TV, onto your PC." This could be some very basic software. Suitable for Macs?
"While this feature seems pretty cool, it's not as good as similar functionality built into a PS3 or an Xbox 360, let alone that of a dedicated network media streamer like Apple TV. Despite being billed as DLNA-compliant, the TV won't play nice with DLNA server software like Windows Media Player 11 or TVersity, so you're stuck with the included proprietary software. Samsung's software is basic..." (Compatibility with Macs?)
OPTION B) Buy the older model and then, add ATV. The total cost will be less and I think, the video playback (through my iMac?) and networking capabilities (2Wire Wi-Fi) will be much better. But I see there have been problems between ATV and Samsung HDTV.
Isn't the combo with ATV a much more capable and flexible (and cheaper) long-term solution? Which Samsung is unlikely to match?
Thanks for your valuable advice! (Urgent for the X-Mas season!)

Winston, I think you're missing my points:
1) If you're interested in a device for watching HD video, then you can compare the AppleTV and Blu-Ray. You then have to look at what other features they provide, or don't provide as the case may be, and decide. I was just giving my opinion on an alternative.
2) There was no detailed information given as to what the streaming capabilities were and so I was giving my opinion again.
To say that there is little difference quality wise between current HD broadcasts (even if some are 1440x1080i) and the maximum output of the AppleTV at 1280x720 shows a total lack of experience on your part of watching HD broadcasts on a TV capable of 1920x1080, or a lack of appreciation of the better detail contained in the picture. It's like comparing AppleTV HD at 1280x720 with DVD PAL native resolution of 720x576 and saying there is little difference quality wise. But then if you look at the US market where 30fps is standard, the AppleTV cannot support resolutions higher than 960x540, and then you really are lowering the benefits of the AppleTV over DVD quality, and the difference between the AppleTV and HD broadcasts is even bigger.
I have compared video from HD broadcast at 1920x1080 with the same video converted down to 1280x720 on the AppleTV, and the loss of detail is noticeable, especially when watching on a 40" TV, not an uncommon size these days with them being used with games consoles. Before you comment, no it is nothing to do with how I convert them, there is just physically far fewer pixels available. I much prefer watching 1920x1080 through my Media PC than watching 1280x720 through my AppleTV.
Also, as we all know it happens, there is software available freely on the internet - no names will be mentioned - that allow the convertion of movies from DVD to a PC, and likewise from HD-DVD and Blu-Ray to a PC. So reality is that it's available now and with the cost of 1TB and 1.5TB HDDs so cheap, the potential for a 1920x1080 resolution video collection for playing on a 1920x1080 TV is already there. Saying it's not going to happen 'any time soon' is rediculous as it's already happening, albeit quietly, especially as talk of how to do such things is not allowed on this forum.
You keep using this phrase 'any time soon' without quantifying it. You use words like 'unlikely'. We live in a fast changing world. The world of televisions has changed dramatically in the last two years, whereby nearly all mid-priced TVs (both plasma and lcd) from about £800 GBP upwards now support native 1920x1080. Two years ago I paid over £1500 GBP for a 37" plasma supporting native 1024x720. You can now buy Sony OLED 11" TVs, which a couple of years ago were just being shown off as prototypes. In my opinion, OLED will blow away lcd and plasma tv sales within 5 years, and in my timescale, that is any time soon.
12 months ago I bought a blu-ray player for a PC, whilst people around me were going for hd-dvd. The format wars was predicted as not going to end 'any time soon' and no one could have forseen that within 6 months the whole blu-ray / hd-dvd argument would be over.
For your information, ABC in the US have been broadcasting in HD for over 10 years.
But as I keep saying Winston, these are my opinions. You're allowed yours and I'm allowed mine.

Should i open my new iPod Touch or wait for the (S) model?

So i just bought an iPod Touch 2G and just found out that the new iPhone 3G S will have a faster processor and other extras to play games better, in fact, some say that the App Store might slip in two sections, one section for the S model and the other for the rest of the iDevices.
Should i hold off and wait and see if Apple might also upgrade the iPod Touch in near future?

Whatever floats your boat. I have a 2nd Gen Touch, which is great, but if I were in the market now for a Touch, I'd wait.

OC4J 10.1.2 - No XPathFactory implementation found for the object model

Hello,
We are doing some maintenance on an old 10.1.2.3.0 container. The project has to be extended with a library built with xml-apis-1.3.03.jar. I know you will suggest a upgrade, but that is a no-go - sorry, since other projects also are running on this server. So I hope some of you remember or know how to avoid or replace the oracle xml parser.
It seems like it gets the wrong XPathFactory
XPathFactory#newInstance() failed to create an XPathFactory for the default object model: http://java.sun.com/jaxp/xpath/dom
with the XPathFactoryConfigurationException: javax.xml.xpath.XPathFactoryConfigurationException: No XPathFctory implementation found for the object model:
I have searched the documentation for 10.1.2 and everything relevant on the Internet for a solution, but i seems to non-trivial when dealing with oracle xml parser. We tried to put the jar-files (xml-apis-1.3.03.jar, xercesImpl-2.8.0.jar, xalan-2.6.0.jar) in the endorsed library under the jdk, and we have already added <web-app-class-loader search-local-classes-first="true" include-war-manifest-class-path="true"/> to our orion-web.xml.
I also know that the <shared-library> tag got introduced in 10.1.3 where you easily can replace the parser.
Any ideas on how to deal with this exception or comments to the interpretation on the exception are appreciated.
-MK

Hello,
You are correct, in OracleAS 10g (10.1.2), Oracle does not expose JMX MBean server.
OracleAS 10g R3 (10.1.3) is a J2EE 1.4 container will full support for JMX, and all the JSR-77 MBeans exposed. You can also create and register your own MBeans.
Could you give us the different requirements you have around JMX for your application?
Regards
Tugdual Grall

I want to exchange all my equipment for the newest model available.

I've been a steady customer since Feb. 2008. I want to exchange all of my equipment for the latest model available. How do I go about that?

It's my understanding that I'm a grandfathered "original" customer, whatever that means. My answers might be different from what you'll get.
If you have Motorola 1200, 1215 (DVR) or 1225 (DVR) boxes, I agree. These boxes are obsolete and slow. They'll still get updates, but it's like trying to run Windows 8.1 on something that was purchased with Windows XP on it... it may work, but it'll take a long time to do a very simple task. A few years ago, when the update was pushed out to AT&T boxes that introduced the spinning circle in the lower right corner and "poster view" for movies, those boxes I mentioned basically started running very slowly.
It's my understanding those boxes are obsolete and are being junked when they're returned to AT&T.
AT&T has two types of modern non-DVR boxes... wireless and wired. I had a tech come out and he was able to waive the $49 fee to get one wireless box. If you call AT&T and let them know your boxes "broke" because of an update they pushed out, and if you're nice and polite, you should be able to get them to waive the $49 fee... actually, you may have to pay it, but your next bill will get a $49 credit...that's what they did in my case.
I don't think that was 100% free as my taxes and fees were *a bit* higher on one bill and I don't know if they were that much lower on the next bill...but whatever.
When I added a second wireless box, I had it shipped via UPS and installed it myself. I was able to get them to credit the $49 fee off the next bill. Once again, I paid $49 on one bill and my next bill had the $49 credit.
Now...if you want the newer wired boxes, there shouldn't be any sort of fee. Like I said before, it was AT&T that pushed out newer software. IMO, a customer shouldn't pay when AT&T's update "breaks" a customer's equipment.
As for the DVR, yes, you will lose recordings. What you *can* do is either buy a Slingbox and put the DVR and Slingbox by theirselves or just put the DVR on a TV you don't watch a whole lot.
My silver remotes still work absolutely fine. If you want a newer "basic" remote, keep in mind that some buttons have changed. Those should be free, at least they are when mine stop working and I know for a fact they have new batteries.

XML Parser Message: Element series is not valid for the content model

Hello,
I work with FrameMaker 8 and DITA.
I change the element prodinfo in the topic.edd from:
General rule: (prodname), (vrmlist), (brand | series | platform | prognum | featnum | component)*
to:
General rule: (brand | series | platform | component)*
When I import the element definition to the template everything is okay.
When I insert the elements metadata, prodinfo, brand, series, platform and component into a topic I get the XML Parser Message that the element brand is not valid for the content model (prodname,vrmlist, ((brand|series|platform|prognum|featnum|component))*).
When I delete the element brand in the topic I get the XML Parser Message that the element series is not valid for the content model (prodname,vrmlist, ((brand|series|platform|prognum|featnum|component))*).
I change the element prodinfo in the topic.edd to:
General rule: (brand)?, (series)?, (platform)?, (component)?
...and get the same Parser Message.
I do not understand that. Is not it allowed to change the EDD this way without changing the DTD?
With kind regards
Nina

Hi Nina... In general, the EDD and DTD need to sync up. You can remove elements from an EDD element definition's general rule, as long as the resulting elements are still valid to the DTD. But if changing a general rule creates an invalid structure, you'll need to also change the DTD to allow the revised structure. With DITA, it is common to remove inline elements from block-level elements. For example, you might want to remove the <msgblock>, <msgnum>, and <msgph> elements from the general rule of the element .. this can be done easily in the EDD and the resulting structure remains valid with the DTD. However, what you're doing leaves the <brand> element as a child of <prodinfo> .. which is invalid. You'll get these errors when saving a file, since this is when the file is validated against the DTD. I do not recommend modifying the structure in such a way that requires you to modify the DTD. If you really need to do this, then you should consider making a specialization to support your revised model. I hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! ...scott

"can the iphone 5 hold 1170 songs and 85 apps or should i go for the 32gb model?"

"can the iphone 5 hold 1170 songs and 85 apps or should i go for the 32gb model?"

I have more music than that and more apps, and I have a 32GB model with about 15GB free, so I would suggest the 32GB.

HT4972 Will there ever be an update for the 2G models or are they now obselete?

Will there ever be an update for the 2G models or are they now obselete?

Pretty sure they're well past their "expiration" date.

Should i buy macbook Pro now??? or wait for the new model in 2012..???

i want to buy MacBook Pro....so... should i wait for the new model or???

Your question is analogues to the same situation if you were contemplating the purchase of a new car.
If you need one and the current model satisfies your needs, purchase it. If the current crop does not satisfy your needs you certainly can wait for a new model, but there is no guarantee that the new model will have features that will fulfill your expectations.
In short, your choices are dealing with the known vs unknown possibilities.
Ciao.

Is There Newer Firmware For The N95

hey guys does anyone know if there will be newer firmware anytime soon for the nokia n95
my current firmware is
V 21.0.016
14-02-08
RM-159
any help with a newer version
thanks
Nokia N95 v31.0.017 16GB Nokia N91 4GB Nokia N80 2GB Sony Ericsson W850i 4GB
Solved!
Go to Solution.

New versions are not announced before they're made available.
V21.0.016 is indeed the latest version for the N95-1 right now.
You can find the latest version for your phone by going here:
http://europe.nokia.com/link?cid=EDITORIAL_528996
Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

Lack of firmware updates for the N95 8GB

Does anyone know what the latest firmware is for the N95 8GB? I've unlocked my phone from Vodafone but the updater still says the latest version is 20.0.016 but there are numerous posts talking about version 30?

As stated in his first post he has unlocked his phone. Also there is no point even phoning Vodafone. I spent around 2 months speaking to them trying to get an update for my N96 which never came. I was then also told they were under no obligation to do it either. Only option for me was to get the vodafone branding removed, so glad I did as he phone is much quicker now.

Lightsabre app for the N95

Has anybody tried the lightsabre app for the N95?
I just saw it for the first time on youtube, looks fun.
Nokia N95-1
v30.0.015

heres the link if you want to try it for yourself http://www.zoeandgraham.co.uk/lightsabre/
EnjoyMessage Edited by adiy2k on 24-Nov-200709:54 PM
Nokia n95, 5800 and n97

Can I trade a broken ipod touch for the same model.

Can I trade a broken ipod touch (dead battery) for the same model.

Yes. See the repair pricing here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=United_States&product=ipod
If only the battery the exchange price is $79.
You can make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store for the exchange
Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar

Islamic organiser for the N95 model.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for