Issue in IT2001

Hi All,
I have any issue in IT2001. My requirment is if an employee on sick leave first 6 months no pay and next 6 100% sicknees Pay.
I have done setting in PY--> Payroll: Great Britain --> Statutory and Occupational Absences --> Occupational Absences (OxP) --> New OxP Absence Processing (Automatic) --> Absence Evaluation Schemes --> Create Absence Evaluation Scheme Rules
Scheme            Rule     Text                     Start seniority           End Seniority     units           Start age      End age      Units    Start date           End date
08CASUAL      00      0 to 6Months          0                                        6                        Months                                                             01.01.1990     31.12.9999
08CASUAL      01      7 to 11   Months         7                                 00011                Months                                                                 01.01.1990     31.12.9999
selected first record and double click on Entitlement Band and maintained required fields. In Payment Band I have selected as Nil Pay(Default).
Now I have enter for 30 days sickness for any employee in PA30 and checked in it2001when we click on Rem.Entitlements
000                              8   Only OSP         Nil Pay (Default)           6.0         6.0 Month-wo
001                              8   Only OSP         100% Sickness              12.0        12.0 Month-wo
When we click on Absence breakdown tab it is not showing date wise whether it is nil pay or 100% sickness or not.
Could you please advice.

Githa,
Its correct.
In your 3 absence days also it is correct, as you might have set Counting rule to avoid Sat/Sun.
Being half day it is showing Zero Calendar days, which will show only if you take more than 1 full day.
If you want to generate some other result from less than one day absence, you can set your rounding rule for the same.
Best Wishes.
Pls. check you have written Absence Days as 3 Days in half day also ???
Edited by: Always Learning... on Jul 16, 2009 6:30 PM

Similar Messages

Performance issue for this function-module(HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA)

Hi Friends
I am having performance issue for this function-module(HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA) and one my client got over 8 thousend employees . This function-module taking forever to read the data. is there any other function-module to read the absences data IT2001 .
I did use like this .if i take out this F.M 'HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA_INI' its not working other Function-module.please Suggest me .
call function 'HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA_INI'
exporting "Publishing to global memory
option_string = option_s "string of sel org fields
trig_string = trig_s "string of req data
alemp_flag = sw_alemp "all employee req
infot_flag = space "split per IT neccessary
sel_modus = sw_apa
importing
org_num = fdpos_lines "number of sel org fields
tables
fieldtab = fdtab "all org fields
field_sel = fieldnametab_m. "sel org fields
To Read all infotypes from Absences type.
RP_READ_ALL_TIME_ITY PN-BEGDA PN-ENDDA.
central function unit to provide internal tables: abse orgs empl
call function 'HR_TIM_REPORT_ABSENCE_DATA'
exporting
pernr = pernr-pernr
begda = pn-begda
endda = pn-endda
IMPORTING
SUBRC = SUBRC_RTA
tables
absences = absences_01
org_fields = orgs
emp_fields = empl
REFTAB =
APLTAB =
awart_sel_p = awart_s[]
awart_sel_a = awart_s[]
abstp_sel = abstp_s[]
i0000 = p0000
i0001 = p0001
i0002 = p0002
i0007 = p0007
i2001 = p2001
i2002 = p2002
i2003 = p2003.
Thanks & Regards
Reddy

guessing will not help you much, check with SE30 to get a better insight
SE30
The ABAP Runtime Trace (SE30) - Quick and Easy
what is the total time, what are the Top 10 in the hitlist.
Siegfried

USER EXIT to be added in IT2001

Hey Experts,
I have the following requirment and i havnt worked on HR ABAP.
Please provide me the solution and how to reach the user exit in the infotype.
User exit needs to be added to IT 2001 to include the logic mentioned below:
a.     For every new record of subtype ANLE or ANLS in IT2001 for any employee, check the IT 0000 (infotype actions), table P0000 if any Action Type I2 (Termination of Contract) exists
b.     If found, check the Quota balance for current year for Quota Type 30 (Accrued annual leave), 31 (Carried over annual leave), 32 (Accrued home leave)
c.     Quota balance for each type can be found from IT2006 (Absence Quotas), Table P2006 by deducting P2006-KVERB from P2006-ANZHL
d.     If leave applied is not within this quota, throw error message u2013 Leave exceeds available quota by #(actual no. exceeding)
thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ram
Moderator message: "spec dumping", please work yourself first on your requirement.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Sep 28, 2011 2:20 PM

Hi Shilpa,
there is no hard code rule to use the specific user exit for substitutions, attached screen shots will help you to resolve the issue.
Step 1: Go to the t.code: OKC9, specify the controlling area and event 0001.
Step 2 : Create the substitution and select the step (attachment 1)
Step 3: below mentioned screen shot specify the any existing user exit (naming conversion starts with U) by F4 option and double click on the particular exit
Step 4: you can see the Report ZGGBS800, here you can create the user exit next free number starts with U naming conversion, once it's created the replace the existing user exit in the substitution rule.
Hope this will help you to understand the user exit process in substitution rule.
Note: Only substitution rules there is no hand code rule for user exit, for other transactions we need to check the SAP delivered exits.
Make sure that substitution rule must be activated once exit created
Thanks & Regards
Srinu

ESS MSS leave workflow problem when updating IT2001 & IT2006

Dear all,
We have one issue in our production portal leave system. Hospitalization leave was applied for 22.06.2011 to 28.06.2011. Workflow was done properly. I checked workflow log also. It was done properly. But some how Infotypes 2001 and 2006 were not updated at all for the leave applied. I don't understand what could be the problem. I checked the leave table PTREQ_HEADER. I could see the below statuses.
1. SENT
2. APPROVED
3. ERROR
4. POSTED.
I want to know how the update to IT2001 & IT2006 missing. Is there any special program to post the data to IT2001 and IT2006 .
I appreciate your inputs.
Regards,
Venkat.O

Hi,
Hmmm, clearly there had been some problems due to the ERROR status. Do you know who managed to fix the problem (and how) (for example check the POSTED line in table PTREQ_HEADER and check last changed (or similar) field. Maybe someone tried to manually handle the error and caused the problem. Could you get some more information about the error in PTARQ?
Actually from my point of view this is not a wokflow problem at all. Could you just ask the HR guys to fix it? Isn't it possible to make the infotype entries directly with PA30?
Regards,
Karri

Issue with late coming hrs deduction

Hello,
We have positive time management in place for plant workmen and one absence configured called Late coming to duty.
for which deduction take place in case person reports late in duty.
Now issue is, if workers are doing off-day duty on sunday or wrongly punched on sunday at some late hrs, then at the month end whole day's salary is getting deducted instead of only for late coming hrs. By default in IT2001 "Full Day" indicator is getting selected, therefore we cannot specify the hrs of late coming.
Please sugest how to rectify it, how to deselect the "Full Day" indicator in IT2001 and configure the required late coming hrs.
Do i need to do any modification in counting rule of that absence??
Regards
Tan

Thanks Ranjeeta...it was helpful
Can you please help in another issue i am facing related to it, which is related to fixed sunday off. We do have work-schedule defined sunday as off-day for all employees. But still system is not checking it and deducting salary in case there is no punching on Sunday. For resolving it, we are uploading a off-day special daily work-schedule for all employees in IT2003 and also maintaining variable offs there in case employee works on Sunday.
Now, problem is when employee's off is already defined on sunday in IT2003 and by mistake he punches on Sunday, system is not reading that and allowing his attendance to be recorded.
Please advise, how to rectify this issue.
Regards
Tan

PT_ERL00 Issue

Hi,
I have an issue with report PT_ERL00 - the report is throwing a customised error for an employee (25.03.2013), however the employee is present on that day. See below screenshots.
Also you can see in CAT2 that the employees times have been recorded and approved. They have then been transferred to the PA30 record.
When I run Time Evaluation (RPTIME00) for the employee there is no issues with this date (25.03.2013).
Any help or guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
PT_ERL00
PA30 - Attendances
CAT2
Thanks,
Brian

Hi Brian,
It seems EE is absence on 06.03.2014 and there is no any clock-in/out. The absence record that comes from IT2001 may be generated automatically by system.
If you check PT66 you will see this is a working day for EE based on its work schedule rule. So system works well and stop time evaluation by generating error message.
If you would system go ahead you should implement an automatic absence generation. In this way system will generate an absence record and the next day by running time evaluation system won't stop on this day because the day before a record has been generated and already there is in IT2001.
Regards,
Omid

PY and TM issue

Hi All,
An employee is absent from saturday to monday, but his salary was deducted only for 2 days. But as per the requirement, the salary should be deducted for 3 days.
We have checked in IT2001 and it is showing payroll days as 3 days.
And if an employee is absent for full month, all the sundays are being paid when we process payroll.
Kindly help us to resolve these issue.
Helpfull points will be always rewarded.
Regards,
shyam.

Hi Jun,
Thanx for your inputs.
You are absolutely right. Kindly go thru the issue once again.
If an employee applies leave on saturday and monday, sunday should also be included and deduct 3 days from his quota when processing the payroll. The payroll days are taking 3 in IT2001 but it is getting paid on sunday.
Regards,
shyam.

New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York. I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
1. I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention. Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording. I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows. I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR. Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
2. I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes. One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day. My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new". Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR. Any fixes?
Thanks for the help.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I came from RCN about a year ago. Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable. Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
Some general principles.
Saving changes. When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes. Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options. Look at the Series Options window. Look at the far right side. There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes. Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
Default Series Options. This is accessed from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options. This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options. You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create. Be sure to SAVE your changes. This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide. When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead. Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
Non-series recordings. With Fios you have no directly available options for these. With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series. With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later; change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
And now, to the unwanted repeats.
First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only". If not, fix that and SAVE. Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New". It happens. Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time". To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide. Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored.
Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New". These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel". Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes". However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.
As for you missing two minutes, I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time. To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time. You might have an older software version. Newest is v.1.8. Look at Menu--Settings--System Info. Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes. I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording. There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them. With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

Dear All,
As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
Please suggest.
Ashwani

Dear Jayanti,
We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
/111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
With Regards
Ashwani

Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

Hello Friends
I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
(Delivery completed).
We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
following:
DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM      DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
650000001       10     UB        X
650000001       20     UB        X
650000001       30     UB
650000001       40     UB
When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
system.
Any help is appreciated in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
sampath

Hi Priya and Reddy
   Thanks for your response.
                     Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                    I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                   In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
    41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---
    42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
    43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
    44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
(Here --- means blank)
Thanks and Regards
sampath

HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue

Hello,
I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
Regards,
Anatoly

I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
Click on New Post.
I hope this helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue

Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
Physical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3073 MHz
Built-in memory: 12279 MB
Free memory: 9577 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
Image tile size: 128K
First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
Any help will be gratefully accepted.
Doug

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
doug87510 wrote:
The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key. When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair. That's a feature, not a bug.
Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out. I will download them and try them now myself.
Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing... QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe. Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
-Noel

Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0

Hello,
I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
The issues i am facing --
1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are - Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
--Regards
Dedeepya

Hi Anu,
i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
You can preset your break-points at :-
1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
Regards
Dedeepya C

Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10

Hi all,
This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
When i entered into Log-
1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
My segemnt is as follows-
ZMATMAS05                      matmas05
       E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)
           Z1KLART                        KLART----
My extention
           E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
           E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT)
           E1MARCM                        Master material C segment (MARC)
               Z1AUSPM                        E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
My extention
               E1MARC1                        Additional Fields for E1MARCM
               E1MARDM                        Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
               E1MFHMM                        Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
               E1MPGDM                        Master material product group
               E1MPOPM                        Master material forecast parameter
               E1MPRWM                        Master material forecast value
               E1MVEGM                        Master material total consumption
               E1MVEUM                        Master material unplanned consumption
               E1MKALM                        Master material production version
           E1MARMM                        Master material units of measure (MARM)
           E1MBEWM                        Master material material valuation (MBEW)
           E1MLGNM                        Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
           E1MVKEM                        Master material sales data (MVKE)
           E1MLANM                        Master material tax classification (MLAN)
           E1MTXHM                        Master material long text header
           E1CUCFG                        CU: Configuration data
       E1UPSLINK                      Reference from Object to Superior UPS
Thanks.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PM

CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ?

Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA

Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Thanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi

Issue in IT2001

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for