Issue in Production Core Schema of ATG 10.0.3

Hi All,
I tried to create a schema in Production Core from CIM. The schema created successfully and when I tried to import data , it finished up saying that "No Data to Import".
In the table listing, none of the DCS tables are found.
I am using ATG 10.0.3 version with weblogic server.
Kindly help to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Dinesh

What option did you select under CIM product selection? If you are not able to see DCS tables then you might have selected "ATG Platform" which would not include commerce. You would have to select B2C/B2B commerce or CRS depending on what you are setting up. It will include commerce module along with ATG platform and CA.

Similar Messages

  • Cannot create Schema for ATG Publishing

    I am so close to completing my first install! Please help.
    I am stuck on creating the schema for publishing. Everything else when just fine. But now:
    -------SELECT A DATASOURCE TO CONFIGURE-----------------------------------------
    enter [h]elp, [m]ain menu, [q]uit to exit
    [R] Reporting DataWarehouse - Done
    [L] Reporting Loader - Done
    *[P] Publishing
    [C] Production Core - Done
    [D] Done
    >
    -------CONFIGURE DATASOURCE PUBLISHING------------------------------------------
    enter [h]elp, [m]ain menu, [q]uit to exit
    [C] Connection Details - Done
    [T] Test Connection - Done
    *[S] Create Schema
    Import Initial Data
    [D] Drop Schema
    [O] Configure Another Datasource
    >
    -------CREATE SCHEMA------------------------------------------------------------
    enter [h]elp, [m]ain menu, [q]uit to exit
    Publishing
    *[C] Create Schema
    [S] Skip
    >
    Schema Creation Beginning. View log file at /home/oracle/ATG/ATG10.0.3/home/
    ../CIM/log/cim.log
    |. . . . . . . . |
    |
    -------SCHEMA CREATION FAILED---------------------------------------------------
    enter [h]elp, [m]ain menu, [q]uit to exit
    ORA-00904: "CHECKIN_DATE": invalid identifier
    *[E] Edit Connection Details
    [D] Drop Schema
    [C] Cancel
    >

    Thanks,
    I did try a drop, but it didn't work. However, once more did the trick. Funny thing is the "Drop" didn't actually work as there were foreign key requirements. But I'm past that now.
    Thanks,
    Steve

  • PRINTER 6510 e-all in on. photo product core exe has stopped working?lang=en

     i installed the 6510 all in one printer,   it works great but the photo creation has a message that is (photo product core exe has stopped working).  that should i do to fix it?
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hi Puhu.
    Please contact our customer support team at [email protected] They can help get you printing again.
    Thanks for writing,
    RocketLife
    RocketLife, developer of HP Photo Creations
    » Visit the HP Photo Creations Facebook page — news, tips, and inspiration
    » See the HP Photo Creations video tours — cool tips in under 2 minutes
    » Contact Customer Support — get answers from the experts

  • To restrict Issue for production than planned qty in production order

    Hi Experts,
    In my scenario, the production staff will prepare production order and right click in production order document and select "Issue Components" option to Issue raw materials for production floor. After issuing the raw materials to production floor closes the "Issue for Production" document and now we have "Production Order" document open in screen. When he again select "Issue Components" option and issues the raw materials once again. Materials are issued once again wrongly. This happens since the production order document is not getting refresh after "Issue for Production" document is done.
    Is there any way to restrict issue of raw materials than the planned qty.?
    I have tried lot of ways to restrict this through SP. Please revert me an solution to this issue.
    The procedure should trigger immediately when the "Issue Components" option is selected second time (If the raw materials are issued in full in first time itself). And it should allow only the qty which is to issued to production order qty (if they issue part issue to production order)
    Thanks in advance
    Raja.S

    Hi Neetu,
    Thanks for your quick response. I have tried this query. But it is not blocking the issue for production document even the raw materials are issued already for the production order.
    I'll explain my work flow again. The Production staff will prepare production order and then release the same and update the production order after changing  the status for "Release". Then he will right click the Mouse button and select "Issue Components" option and perform the Issue for Production process. He will issue the required raw material completely in one shot and add the Issue for Production document.
    After adding the Issue for Production document he will close that document and now we will be in Production order document. Now our production order document will not get refreshed. Now the Production staff go for "Issue components" option, then it should not allow him to issue the components once again. But it is allowing him to issue components any number of times. there is no control.
    If we browse the production order document to previous record and browse back to the same record then my Production order document get refreshed and now we can control the issue. But what should i do to control in the earlier case. Since they want to perfrom lot of production order, there is a chance to issue components for same production order more than one time before the production order document get refreshed.
    Please provide me the SP to control this scenario.
    Thanks in advance.
    Raja.S

  • Print layout - Goods issue & Issue for Production

    I designed two print layouts separately 1 in Goods issue for Goods issue in inventory module
    and 1 in Issue for production for Issue for production in production module.
    If i take a print preview or print in Issue for production , it will reflects the print layout designed in Goods issue.
    regards
    kavitha S

    Hi Kavitha,
    I think, are you duplicate the Goods issue PLD Template to Issue for Production PLD Template on Duplicate Layout Template.
    Best, Try to create a New PLD from Issue for Production(System) PLD.
    Regards,
    Madhan.

  • Report issue in Production

    Hi Experts,
    I got an issue in production that it should trigger mails daily once. But this program is triggering for every hour,where to look it pls how to debug this issue?can this FM can check?
    call function 'DURATION_DETERMINE'
        importing
          duration                   = lv_duration
        changing
          start_date                 = ls_history-datum
          start_time                 = ls_history-uzeit
          end_date                   = p_datum
          end_time                   = p_uzeit
        exceptions
          factory_calendar_not_found = 1
          date_out_of_calendar_range = 2
          date_not_valid             = 3
          unit_conversion_error      = 4
          si_unit_missing            = 5
          parameters_not_valid       = 6
          others                     = 7.
      if sy-subrc <> 0.
    Thanks

    Hi ,
    Youi can check this tables
                        MKPF               material document
         MSEG               material document (item level)
                        RESB                                Material reservations
         RKPF                                 header
    Rergards
    SANIL

  • Good issue to Production order - Allows it in back posting date

    Dear all,
    Good issue to Production order ( 261 Movement ), allows us to post the component in back dated eventhough stock is not avaible on that date.
    Example - Component stock on date 10.02.2010 = Zero , I made it Good receipt on date 18.02.2010 and now stock is available on date 18.02.2010.
    Now GI to Production it allows the qty on current and back Posting date also , I want control on date with error message. It should not allowed the GI for back date from 18.02.2010.
    Because of this our MB5B report shows the negetive issue qty if i post in back date.
    Waiting for reply
    Thanks and Regards,
    Saurabh

    Hi SAurabh,
    PLease check whether Negative Stock is allowed for the valuation Area (plant).
    GOTO >> SPRO >> MM>> Invetnroy management and physical inventory >> Goods issue/ Transfer Posting >> Allow Negative stock.
    Untick the Negative stock allowed for your valuation area (PLant)
    Regards,
    Pravin

  • Error while adding  the issue for production (item cost not found)

    Hi all,
    The scenario is,
    when the user is trying to add the issue for production system is showing error item cost not
    found.The item which is issued is Inventory + purchase item with manual issue method.The valuation
    method for that item is FIFO.since the valuation method is FIFO,error related to item cost should
    not occur.
    Since the valuation method is FIFO.Item cost error should not occur.
    The error related to item cost must not occur at the time of issue for production.
    Regards-
    Mona.

    Hi!
    Please check these threads
    Sales Delivery Document
    Item Cost Error
    No item cost was found

  • Error While Updating Issue For Production

    Hi,
            When i am trying to update an UDF in issue for production i am getting the following error message.
      Item is Not a Component to the Referenced work order[Goods Issue - Object Type] Message 3560 -5

    Dear Manikandan K,
    Regarding the message we can tell you that the error message           
    "Item is not a component of the referenced Work Order" usually appears 
    because there is a case sensitive problem between the item code given  
    in the BOM and the item code given in the item master data.            
    Please check if the item codes of the BOM are exactly the same as the  
    codes given in the item master data. There should not be any differences
    between spelling of the codes (for example item code in the item master
    data is with capital letters X00014447 while the item code in the BOM  
    is with normal letters x00014447).                                                                               
    In case you find item with this issue please correct its item code     
    in the BOM manually so it will be exactly identical with the code given
    in the item master data.                                               
    Regards,
    Marcella Rivi
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Error while doing Good Issue for Production Order using BAPI

    Hi All,
    I am facing an error like 'u2018Content of order 1011907: MDT218AJ10 transferred to interface (IMSEG): T-86410-71".
    I have written the code as below. Please let me know what is missing when using the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'. What is the cause of this error ?
    *Action in Transaction (GM_CODE)
    *GM Code for Goods Issue for Production Order is 03
      gs_gmcode-gm_code = '03'.
    *Header Data
    *Posting date
      gs_header-pstng_date = sy-datum.
    *Document date
      gs_header-doc_date   = sy-datum.
    *Item Data
    *Material
      gs_item-material  = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-matnr1.
    *Movement Type
      gs_item-move_type = '261'.
    *Movement Indicator
      gs_item-mvt_ind   = 'F'.
    *Stock Type
      gs_item-stck_type = 'F'.
    *Plant
      gs_item-plant     = gv_plant.
    *Storage Location
      gs_item-stge_loc  = gv_str_loc.
    *Quantity
      gs_item-entry_qnt = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-menge2.
    *Unit
      gs_item-entry_uom = gv_uom.
    *ISO code for unit of measurement
      gs_item-entry_uom_iso = gv_uom.
    *Order Number
      CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
        EXPORTING
          input  = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-aufnr
        IMPORTING
          output = gs_item-orderid.
    *Reservation Number
      gs_item-reserv_no = gv_resv_num.
    *Reservation Item
      gs_item-res_item = gv_resv_itm.
    *Reservation Type
      gs_item-res_type = gv_resv_type.
      APPEND gs_item TO gt_item.
    Calling BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create the Material Document Number
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
        EXPORTING
          goodsmvt_header       = gs_header
          goodsmvt_code         = gs_gmcode
        IMPORTING
          goodsmvt_headret      = gs_headret
        TABLES
          goodsmvt_item         = gt_item
          goodsmvt_serialnumber = gt_serial
          return                = gt_return.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi,
    did you look at message ?
    System says, there are differences between the interface data and the order data. It can be anything. I think you should check
    data in the interface . 
    this is the long explanation of your message :
    Diagnosis
    When calling the function module MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT or the BAPI GoodsMovement.CreateFromData (BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE) to post a goods receipt for a production order, there are differences between the interface data and the order data.
    Example: The order was created for plant 0001, but plant 0002 is passed on in the interface.
    The system checks this for the material and the order item.
    System response
    Due to this difference, the system cannot post the goods receipt.
    Procedure
    Check the data in the interface (IMSEG-WERKS, IMSEG-AUFNR). If necessary, correct the plant or the order number in the interface.
    << Moderator message - Point begging removed >>
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 6, 2012 11:24 AM

  • Goods Issue from Production Order in SAP

    Dear experts,
    I faced one issue not yet solve is that my customer created the production order
    then already issue for production for all quantities of child item .
    Example:
    Production OrderItem A
    Item A1 = 2 Qty
    Item A2 = 2 Qty
    Item A3 = 2 Qty
    Issue for Production Item A
    Item A1 = 2 Qty
    Item A2 = 2 Qty
    Item A3 = 2 Qty
    But later on, my customer found out that 1 Qty of Item A1 already damaged.
    So they want to issue one more Qty of Item A1 instead of one that already damaged.
    How can I issue one more Qty for this item?
    Please your advices are necessary for me.
    Best regard,
    Borey

    Hello Borey,
    Solutions may depend upon the way you want to book the cost for the damaged part A1.
         (a) If you want to book the cost to the production order itself (production order is a cost object), manually book consumption for another quantity using MB1A, 261 movement (you will have to mention the production order during posting this consumption).
         (b) If you do not want to book higher cost to that production order, you can:
               1. Extract damaged quantity of A1 from that production order using MB1A 262 movement.
               2. Create a manual QM lot and after rejection, move that damaged quantity to blocked stock.
               3. You can scrap or rework from that blocked quantity later.
               4. Issue another quantity of A1 from unrestricted stock to that production order using MB1A                261 movement.
    Hope I could help you.
    Best Regards.
    Rajen        

  • ABAP Error:Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (in MIGO-Goods issue to Production)

    Hi Experts,
    while i am doing MIGO(Goods Issue to Production Order, I am getting the below ABAP Error:
    Please give solution, It is urgent requirement.
    THE ERROR IS:
    Short text
         Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM.
    What happened?
         Error in the ABAP Application Program
         The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB" had to be terminated because it
          has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    Error analysis
         During the flow of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (event for the
         initialization of an ABAP program), a condition occurred under which
         the event was to be left early. This is not permitted as it would
         result in an inconsistent status in the ABAP program.
    Trigger Location of Runtime Error
        Program /MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB
        Include /MRSS/LRAP_INT_OBF00
        Row                                     34
        Module type                             (FORM)
        Module Name                             GLOBAL_INIT
    Source Code Extract
    Line  SourceCde
        4
        5 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
        6 *&      Form global_init
        7 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
        8 *       text
        9 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
       10 FORM global_init.
       11
       12 * local data
       13   DATA lv_badi_impl_exists TYPE flag.
       14
       15
       16 * get ref to BAdIs
       17   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
       18     CHANGING
       19       instance = gv_ref_badi_inter_company.
       20 *  CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
       21 * CHANGING
       22 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_rap_back.
       23 *  CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
       24 *    CHANGING
       25 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_ps_int.
         26   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST

    Hi Rob thanks for your response.  I thought about doing an OSS note however; I would think I would need to get the problem in config corrected first as it contradicts each other.  The problem I am talking about is how they are to return material to vendor....I have never even seen this as a process in my 10 years....
    Process.....when the PO is a return to vendor PO they go to migo and choose the goods receipt and mvmt type 101 and the system will default the 161 in the item level....the two are inconsistent.  If I try to change the top level to a 161 mvmt (as this is what I am used to seeing) it gives the error that the PO is not a stock transport order... Would you agree that I should correct that problem first before creating an OSS note?

  • Issue from Production !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Hi Everyone !!!!!!
    Actually i had made Production Order Form in which i can populate all the Production order with respect to BOM (Bill of Material).
    Now i want to Populate Specific Production Order Number  another form which is "Issued for Prouction " Basically Now i want to developed another form which can be worked Like Issue from Production Screen.
    For this i have to use Production Order Object in SAP based....
    Could anybody have sample code for this .......that would be really helpful for me,
    The Main Problem is that i do not know how it will start ? how can i get the Production Order as well as their Item List.....and how can i issued Production Order in Issue from Production Form.....
    could you guide me that where should i have to start ........
    Thanks
    Regards..
    Rizwan

    hello
    Check the following thread:
    Regards
    János

  • How to get material's last posting date of issuing to production order?

    Hi,
    In my scenario, I need to get material's last posting date of issuing to production order (e.g. mov. typ. 261).
    I tried to select the material documents whose movement type is 261, and restrict the posting date from month to month each time, until the first material document is selected.
    But this method seems quite inefficient.
    What kind of algorithm is more effient to do this?
    Thanks
    Wesley

    Hi,
    select max( budat )
      from mkpf
      into gv_budat
      where mblnr in ( select mblnr
                         from aufm
                        where aufnr = gv_aufnr "(Prod. Order)
                            and  matnr = gv_matnr "(Issued Material)
                            and bwart = '261' ).
    Edited by: Azeem Ahmed Matte on Mar 12, 2010 12:33 PM

  • Java Development issue/differences between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo (??)

    Hi Everyone,
    I am a Java developer that uses my 17" MBP Core Duo for all of my development. Lately, I've been trying to use both the Glassfish Application Server V2 (from Sun) and Maven 2.09 from the Apache project. I have configured identical scenarios on my MBP Core Duo and on a 15" MBP Core 2 Duo.
    The scenario involves compiling and running some webservices (at least on the Core 2 Duo) in a local development environment. Both machines use the default JDK 1.5.0_13 installed on the machine.
    On the 17" Core Duo, issuing a "mvn install" command produces the following error:
    [INFO] Compiling 1 source file to /Users/john/downloads/soabook-code-20070504/chap07/endpoint-provider/modules/en dpoint/target/classes
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] Fatal error compiling
    Embedded error: Prohibited package name: java.lang
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] Total time: 12 seconds
    [INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 05 07:09:06 CDT 2008
    [INFO] Final Memory: 9M/17M
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Running Maven with the "-e" switch turned on produces the following stacktrace:
    org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Fatal error compiling
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecyc leExecutor.java:564)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(De faultLifecycleExecutor.java:480)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycl eExecutor.java:459)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailure s(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(Default LifecycleExecutor.java:278)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExe cutor.java:143)
    at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334)
    at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125)
    at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:280)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.ja va:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
    at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
    at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
    at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
    at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
    Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Fatal error compiling
    at org.apache.maven.plugin.AbstractCompilerMojo.execute(AbstractCompilerMojo.java: 498)
    at org.apache.maven.plugin.CompilerMojo.execute(CompilerMojo.java:114)
    at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.j ava:443)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecyc leExecutor.java:539)
    ... 16 more
    Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: Prohibited package name: java.lang
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.preDefineClass(ClassLoader.java:534)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:669)
    at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
    at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(IsolatedClassL oader.java:56)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:374)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:675)
    at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
    at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(IsolatedClassL oader.java:56)
    at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler.compileInProcess(JavacCompiler .java:398)
    at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler.compile(JavacCompiler.java:141 )
    at org.apache.maven.plugin.AbstractCompilerMojo.execute(AbstractCompilerMojo.java: 493)
    However, the exact same software setup on the Core 2 Duo produces this result (which I would expect on the Core Duo):
    [INFO] Installing /Users/john/Downloads/soabook-code-20070504/chap07/endpoint-provider/pom.xml to /Users/mjhart/.m2/repository/soabook/chap07-endpoint-provider/1.0/chap07-endpoi nt-provider-1.0.pom
    [INFO]
    [INFO]
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] Reactor Summary:
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER-WSDL2JAVA .................... SUCCESS [1:35.885s]
    [INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER-ENDPOINT ..................... SUCCESS [7.221s]
    [INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER-CLIENT ....................... SUCCESS [16.525s]
    [INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER .............................. SUCCESS [1.597s]
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [INFO] Total time: 2 minutes 1 second
    [INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 05 07:07:23 CDT 2008
    [INFO] Final Memory: 16M/30M
    [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I have installed the same software versions and have the same configuration on a Windows desktop running XP SP2 and get the same successful result.
    Is this an issue between the Core Duo and Core 2 Duo? I can't see that it is since I don't believe the hardware influences the software to that degree. However, I am at a loss for what is causing the issue and the Apache Maven list insists that there are developers that are using Maven successfully on OS X.
    I really need to get past this issue, but I am at a loss. Please help.
    Thanks,
    John

    Have you repaired permissions? (/Applications/Utilities/Disk Utility.app)
    Are you sure you're using JDK 5? (Applications/Utilities/Java/Java Preferences.app or output of $ javac -version)
    --greg

Maybe you are looking for