Issue in Profitability segment in ITS for FV50

Dear All,
I am creating ITS for FV50 tcode and testing the same.
Here every thing goes fine except profitability segment. I am cliking on Profitability segment (PS) and Window popup is opening. Here when I am passing Profit center and try to go back by pressing Continue button, it is not working. I am not able to perform any action on PS pop window (Continue, Cancel etc.. )
But all other popups on window are working fine like F4 help etc.
Please check below parameters that I am passing while creating service.
~TRANSACTION
FV50
~WEBGUI
1
~WEBGUI_SIMPLE_TOOLBAR
24
~SINGLETRANSACTION
0
~POPUPS
1
Please help, its urgent.
Thanks

Hi Neha,
I was not aware of FV50 transaction but below are some trouble shooting options to try out.
(1). Have you tried to test the same service in different browser (Chrome,IE,Firefox etc.. )
(2). Is the screen published correctly? (Check the HTML code generated for the push button OK-CODE)
(3). Any changes have you observed when tested on SAP GUI and on device.
(4). Any dumps generated?
Regards,
SG

Similar Messages

  • Issue in Creating a screen variant for FV50 through SHD0

    Hi,
    I need to create a Screen variant for FV50 to hide the post button through the Transaction SHD0, It was working fine and the function keys BU and BS  i disabled in the variant, but the problem is when i disabled the Function keys from FV50 it is not allowing me to post the transaction in FBV0 also. I found that T code FV50 is using the program :SAPMF05A  and FBV0 is using : SAPMF05V.
    Is there any way to overcome the issue through the transaction SHD0 ?
    Regards
    San

    Hi,
    To Create  aVariant You can use Tcode : SHD0.
    Provide the tocde and clik on Screen variant and create...
    You can follow the below link as Reference ..
    Link:[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/67/232037ebf1cc09e10000009b38f889/content.htm]
    Hope it helps you.
    Thanks
    Arbind

  • BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE settlement rule for profitability segment

    I am trying to create internal orders using BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE, in the Settlement rules data I want to settle to profitability segment but I can't find away to do this. I can settle to other orders, cost centers and WBS elements but not PSG.
    Are you guys aware of any way I cant do this. How can I derive profitability segment from PNL? is there other functions that will help do this?
    Thank you very much
    Omar

    Yes that field is enabled for settling from settlement profile configuration. The other enabled fields like order, cost centers and profit centers are available.
    I think the BAPI is missing this functionality since the profitability segment has to be derived from other characteristics like PNL.
    Are you guys aware of any functions that do the derivation of the profitability segment given PNL for example?
    In this case where the BAPI is missing some key function what is the best way forward?
    Thanks very much
    Omar

  • Problem with profitability segment derivation while posting sales order

    Hello,
    We have the issue of profitability segment being not derived when the sales order is changed using BAPI 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'. Subsequent to calling this BAPI we execute a BDC - to derive the profitability segment - which runs well in the foreground but fails in the background. Immediate help in this regards would be of immense help.
    I have searched the forum but could not locate anything useful. There is this thread (Re: BDC for profitability segment VA02 (sales order)) citing the same problem but without answers.
    Kind Regards,
    Indu Shekar

    Probability Segment is maintained but  Profitability Segment is still grayed out.
    The only way i was able to move things to COPA  was to do a project Settlement from
    WBS element to Profitability Segment (PSA).
    But does anyone know if we can move things to COPA during Sales Order (specifically for a project-based Sales Order)?
    Thanks.

  • Profitability segment lost

    Hi Gurus,
           I created a FI doc and I filled one item with profitability segment, and this doc was posted successfully.
           But when I check this document, that item's profitability segment got lost. The button of profitability segment is grey, meaning it can not  be clicked.
           Profitability segment field status for corresponding account is required. No COPA doc is generated. And its real CO assignment object is cost center, not profitability segment.
            Anyone has some clue,thanks.
    regards
    zhihua

    Hi..
    You should check whether the Substitution is applied for the GL account to replace profitability segment with cost center using t-code OKC9 or OBBH.

  • User exit for profitability segment in service order settlement rule

    Does anybody know if exit EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 works for the profitability segment creation during the creation of a settlement rule of a service order?
    The context is the following: the company uses service orders which are settled periodically (it receives revenue from sales order which is posted to the service orders at time of billing, and also costs at time of goods issue). The profitability segment in the settlement rule of the service order needs to be the same as the one from the billing document that posted to the order.
    Can I use EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 to find the characteristics from the billing document and populate it in the PSG of the settlement rule? If yes, could this be applied to only one specific service order type?
    Thank you.

    Hi
    If your settlement is triggered by a batch or is triggered by a workflow exit EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 is not run. From release 5.00 on characteristic groups are indeed not considered any more during batch input processes because there were problems before with initial chars of a CO-PA line item resulting from a batch input process that actually shouldn't be initial.
    Refer SAP Note 581739, which put an end to usage of char groups during batch input processes. Also refer SAP Note 142628.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    Edited by: Sanil K Bhandari on Jun 23, 2011 10:12 AM

  • DKACB-XERGO Assignment to a profitability segment has no effect for account

    Hi,
    I have a batch input (FB01) in error for this message:
    Assignment to a profitability segment has no effect for account XXXXXXXXXX
    This account is not to opened as cost element...and this is correct.
    If I process batch input in foreground, I notice that field 'Profit. Segment'
    (DKACB-XERGO) is flagged.
    How Can I unflag this field?
    Where 'Profit. Segment' is customized?
    Thanks,
    Marco

    I am wondering what is behind the batch input or what process is used  to do that. For e.g, when I tried entering FB01 transaction with a pure G/L account (it has no cost element) and  clicked on the profitability segment icon, I got the same message what you got.
    So could it be possible that batch input goes through the 'Detail screen for profitability segment' though it may not be required?

  • Validation for profitability segment in Account document

    Hi Team,
    Currently We are using validation for cost object i.e. either cost center or WBS elements enter  in a  GL account line items and if we are enter both cost object then system will be give Error message . in this validation we have added validation for profitability segment . System will be allow only one at a time enter in Gl accounts (i.e. cost center /WBS elements / profitability segment ). But it is not working for  profitability segment so can you help regarding this.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Manas deo

    Hi
    I think you should check
    BSEG-KOSTL <> "" (Blank) AND BSEG-PROJK(WBS) <> ""
    OR
    BSEG-KOSTL<> "" AND BSEG-PAOBJNR <> ""
    OR
    BSEG-PROJK <> "" AND BSEG-PAOBJNR <> ""
    trigger the error msg
    br, Ajay M

  • Which table is available for profitability segment?

    Hi,
    I have the G/L account, the Profit center and the customer number.
    In which table can I find the profitability segment?
    Thank you.
    Kind regards,
    Linda

    Profitability segment we can find in CE4XXXX
    CE1XXX is for actual line item
    CE2XXX is for plan line item
    CE3XXX is for Summary record by profit segment
    XXXX stands for operating concern
    Assign points if useful

  • Mandatory field set up for Profitable segment entry

    Dear All,
    Is there any way to set up Customer as mandatory field in profitable segment while manually posting  to GL for which Profitable segment is required.
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi Ram,
    You could try to use Enhancement COPA000 for this requirement.

  • GL Account Subject for Profitability Segment

    Hi gurus,
    I just want to ask if how will I know if a certain GL account is subject for Profitability Segment (CO-PA).
    Regards
    Andre

    Hi
    I think you should check
    BSEG-KOSTL <> "" (Blank) AND BSEG-PROJK(WBS) <> ""
    OR
    BSEG-KOSTL<> "" AND BSEG-PAOBJNR <> ""
    OR
    BSEG-PROJK <> "" AND BSEG-PAOBJNR <> ""
    trigger the error msg
    br, Ajay M

  • Profitability Segment for Parked Documents

    Hi All,
    I have got the FI Document Item details for Parked FI Documents in table VBSEGS.  I have entered a Profit. Segment (field PAOBJNR) for these.  As these items are not posted yet, the information will not be shown up in tables CE1XXXX.  I would like to ask in which table can I get the Profit.Segment details of the Parked Documents.
    Thanks.

    HI,
    guess its CE4xxxx. Check also CE4xxxx_ACCT if you deont find it in CE4xxxx.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Profitability Segments are not created for Invoices

    Hi Guru's
    Can any one help on this ?
    "Invoice Documents Profitability Segments are not created" can you please suggest me?
    Thanks,
    Aakash

    Hi Aakash,
    I think you are trying to integrate FICA with CO-PA and then getting the error.
    The posting of a contract accounts A/R & A/P document in CO-PA is dependent on-
    (a) Activation of the operating concern in the SPRO node Controlling → Profitability Analysis →
    Structures → Define Operating Concern → Maintain Characteristics
    and
    (b) CO short account assignment of the contract in the SPRO Node Financial Accounting → Contract
    Accounts Receivable and Payable → Basic Functions → Posting and Documents → Documents
    → Define Account Assignments for Automatic Postings → Store CO Short Account Assignments
    for IS-U Contracts.
    In here, the system only carries out the posting if the Profitability Segment Assigned selected in CO
    account assignment.
    Hope it helps...
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • Profitability segment issue

    hi
    iam having issues with profitablity segment number bcoz in my case system is behaving like this now. when i settle the order with new charecteristic values it is showing settlement reciever as "123" on settlement screen. but when i looked into ce4xxxx table it is showing different segment number for same posting. can anyone  help me to resolve this problem
    thanks
    monica

    the PA segment number you see in the document refers to teh PA segment number in table CE4XXXX_ACCT. This table has a field called Key CE4 (CE4KEY) which in turn links to teh PA segment number in CE4XXXX
    Praveen.

  • Profitability segment being derived again-in MIRO for Subsequent Credit

    HI All,
    Need help for below Warning message i could not able to post MIRO for subsequesnt Credit.
    Profitability segment being derived again
    Message no. KI350Diagnosis
    You have assigned an profitability segment with the auxiliary account assignment  PrCtr 5300MN0000. The profitability segment, however, contains the characteristics  PrCtr 5300MN0000.
    System Response
    The characteristics of the profitability segment and the auxiliary account assignments must not contain different values. In particular, the profit center and business area must match.

    Hi
    As Waman said, there will be some substitution which is forcing PC into the line item.. Else, this problem wont occur...
    If possble, switch off your subst and Post this entry..... See if it goes through
    Br, Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for