Issue in Releaving action

Dear Friends,
We have done a August month payroll for all employees and also posted the same payroll results to Accounting.
Actually payroll period parametre is every month 25th but  we are runniing up to month end and giving 5 days advance salary to all.
Here mext month we came to know that one of the employee is not coming to office after 26th of August.But we paid him total august month Salary.Then we completed the releaving action W.E.F 26th of august for this employee.
Now problem is in posting results are not showing balances and showing negative results for only those 5 days.
How to overcome this issue.
Immediate response are so helpful....
Regards:
Kumar

Hi,
If the employee has to payback the amount then you need to collect the money from the employee in any form and do a manual adjustment in FI to balance the account and also in HR create a wagetype and enter with difference amount and nullify the difference and post it FI. Its a work around .
Many time it happens when an employee quits without serving their notice period and his deductions(notice period payout) will be more than his earnings and we do the same sort of adjustments.
Let me know if you are not clear.
thanks,

Similar Messages

  • Security issues in OM Actions

    Hello gurues,
       I had customized some actions for PA and I could customized parameter UGR so that not all of them would be displayed in PA40 (depending on UGR parameter of each user)
      Now, I have to deal with OM actions and I realize They dont use parameter UGR.... Is there any way to implement some security issues in these actions? How can I deny or grant access to OM actions to some users?
      Please ANY comment will be very apreciated, thanks very much in advance.
      Regards, Cristian.

    I don't know of a parameter to help you with this but a couple ideas: obviously, standard security will restrict folks from using actions they're not supposed to, but they'll still see them in the drop down list in transaction PP03 - they just won't be able to use them; you can use the actual transactions for the actions and only give people authorization to the transactions they're supposed to use (these are listed in Table T77S0 under group 'TCODE' and you have to look for them b/c they're mixed in with other transactions - for example, the action 'Create Position' is PQ13); you could just use PPOCE/PPOME, which is much cleaner than actions and the method I have recommended my clients use since 4.6C.  The client won't have to dig through a list of irrelevant actions. 
    One word of warning - don't delete the delivered actions you're not using.  They're used throughout the system.  For example, all the Training Management actions drive the screens in the Training Management function.  If you delete them, the training screens will be gone.  That may not matter now, but it could impact your client as they grow their footprint in the future.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    Sharon

  • Issue with folder action created with automator

    Hello all,
    I'm having an issue with folder actions that i created with automator and it's driving me crazy. Apple says they can't help with things created by the user so this is my only shot at figuring this out.
    Running a Mini 2.3G quad i7, 8GB ram on OSX Mavericks 10.9.2
    My goal is to set up an action to add text to the filename of a file placed into a particular folder. So I open automator and choose folder action. Then I choose the folder I want the action applied to at the top. Then I go to Files and Folders in the library and choose rename finder items and drag it over to the workflow. I select add text, then add the text I want added to the file name and choose before name because I want the added text to preceede the original filename text. I save it then go to the folder I applied it to and right clikc go to services then folder actions and verify that the service is attached to that particular folder and it is.
    Should work right? No. When I place a file in that folder the action runs and adds the text like I want it to... but then it starts to add it over and over again in an infinite loop. It also adds a file with the extension .ds_store to the folder that also has the name added over and over.
    I've tried deleteing all the folder actions and even deleteing all the folder actions themselves saved by the automator in the workflow file in the user library.
    I'm stumped... no idea what to do. A while ago I had used the automator to batch rename files and it worked perfectly. I tried the same steps i listed above to set this action up on a machine in an Apple retail store and it worked... so I know I have the set up right.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Justin

    Hi JK257
    This is why it happens:
    The folder action is looking for new items in the folder. You drop in a file called "File1". So it renames it "sometext File1". Then it sees this new file called "sometext File1" and thinks "Hey, this is a new file - I'll call it 'sometext sometext File1' because I have to rename every new file." Then it sees this new file called "sometext sometext File1" and thinks...
    You get the picture.
    (the .ds_store is a normally hidden database file which is getting revealed by the same process.)
    The solution is to move the files out of the renamer folder into a receiving folder after they have been renamed:
    Hope this helps,
    H

  • Performance issues with dynamic action (PL/SQL)

    Hi!
    I'm having perfomance issues with a dynamic action that is triggered on a button click.
    I have 5 drop down lists to select columns which the users want to filter, 5 drop down lists to select an operation and 5 boxes to input values.
    After that, there is a filter button that just submits the page based on the selected filters.
    This part works fine, the data is filtered almost instantaneously.
    After this, I have 3 column selectors and 3 boxes where users put values they wish to update the filtered rows to,
    There is an update button that calls the dynamic action (procedure that is written below).
    It should be straight out, the only performance issue could be the decode section, because I need to cover cases when user wants to set a value to null (@) and when he doesn't want update 3 columns, but less (he leaves '').
    Hence P99_X_UC1 || ' = decode('  || P99_X_UV1 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC1  ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV1  ||')
    However when I finally click the update button, my browser freezes and nothing happens on the table.
    Can anyone help me solve this and improve the speed of the update?
    Regards,
    Ivan
    P.S. The code for the procedure is below:
    create or replace
    PROCEDURE DWP.PROC_UPD
    (P99_X_UC1 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_UV1 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_UC2 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_UV2 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_UC3 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_UV3 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_COL in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_O in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_V in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_COL2 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_O2 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_V2 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_COL3 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_O3 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_V3 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_COL4 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_O4 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_V4 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_COL5 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_O5 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_V5 in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_CD in VARCHAR2,
    P99_X_VD in VARCHAR2
    ) IS
    l_sql_stmt varchar2(32600);
    p_table_name varchar2(30) := 'DWP.IZV_SLOG_DET'; 
    BEGIN
    l_sql_stmt := 'update ' || p_table_name || ' set '
    || P99_X_UC1 || ' = decode('  || P99_X_UV1 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC1  ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV1  ||'),'
    || P99_X_UC2 || ' = decode('  || P99_X_UV2 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC2  ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV2  ||'),'
    || P99_X_UC3 || ' = decode('  || P99_X_UV3 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC3  ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV3  ||') where '||
    P99_X_COL  ||' '|| P99_X_O  ||' ' || P99_X_V  || ' and ' ||
    P99_X_COL2 ||' '|| P99_X_O2 ||' ' || P99_X_V2 || ' and ' ||
    P99_X_COL3 ||' '|| P99_X_O3 ||' ' || P99_X_V3 || ' and ' ||
    P99_X_COL4 ||' '|| P99_X_O4 ||' ' || P99_X_V4 || ' and ' ||
    P99_X_COL5 ||' '|| P99_X_O5 ||' ' || P99_X_V5 || ' and ' ||
    P99_X_CD   ||       ' = '         || P99_X_VD ;
    --dbms_output.put_line(l_sql_stmt); 
    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE l_sql_stmt;
    END;

    Hi Ivan,
    I do not think that the decode is performance relevant. Maybe the update hangs because some other transaction has uncommitted changes to one of the affected rows or the where clause is not selective enough and needs to update a huge amount of records.
    Besides that - and I might be wrong, because I only know some part of your app - the code here looks like you have a huge sql injection vulnerability here. Maybe you should consider re-writing your logic in static sql. If that is not possible, you should make sure that the user input only contains allowed values, e.g. by white-listing P99_X_On (i.e. make sure they only contain known values like '=', '<', ...), and by using dbms_assert.enquote_name/enquote_literal on the other P99_X_nnn parameters.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Issue with Consolidate Action through Batch Process

    We find that when "Load" reports an error, "Consolidate" does not fire - only from Batch. When processing manually, Consolidate fires regardless of Load errors.
    We are using an Essbase load rule that results in records continuing to be loaded, when there are kickouts. So, the Essbase API is returning an error code to FDM [that's fine].
    We want to run a calc script whether or not the load errors.
    Again, with a "manual" process - no problem. But Batch stops prior to firing Consolidate.
    We checked the Batch flag - we set it to "10" (Consolidate) and even "12" (Check).
    Any thoughts?
    We are trying to avoid altering the Load Action code to execute the Essbase calc within that code set.
    Any inputs regarding this issue would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Thanks for responding back. I have seen the link before.
    We have HR_PL_ADMINISTRATOR_000 role. The role has P_ASRCONT P_ORGIN and P_PERNR object. Object  P_ORGIN needs to be set as
    Authorization level            Read
    Infotype                           *
    Personnel Area                *
    Employee Group              *
    Employee Subgroup         *
    Subtype                           *
    Organizational Key            *
    in order to show the Hire Process in execute hiring link on the Portal. If we put a restriction on personal area, we do not see the Hire process on the execute hiring on the portal.
    Kindly advice.
    Thanks,
    Gowri

  • Authorization issue on hire action through HCM Process and Forms

    Hi All,
    We are executing hiring action through HCM form process. The process is using the  HR_PL_ADMINISTRATOR role on ECC which is super admin access to execute the action and HR administrator role on the portal. If we restrict the role with personal area, we do not see the hire process on the portal.
    Could you please let me know if anyone has faced this issue?
    Thanks,
    Gowri

    Thanks for responding back. I have seen the link before.
    We have HR_PL_ADMINISTRATOR_000 role. The role has P_ASRCONT P_ORGIN and P_PERNR object. Object  P_ORGIN needs to be set as
    Authorization level            Read
    Infotype                           *
    Personnel Area                *
    Employee Group              *
    Employee Subgroup         *
    Subtype                           *
    Organizational Key            *
    in order to show the Hire Process in execute hiring link on the Portal. If we put a restriction on personal area, we do not see the Hire process on the execute hiring on the portal.
    Kindly advice.
    Thanks,
    Gowri

  • Issue with Dynamic Actions - Infotype 0041 Updation

    Hi All,
    Requirement :
    I have to update the Date type-13 ( Resignation Date - DAR11 ) without Date ( DAT11 as Blank value - User will fill through Infogroup ) while performing the Termination action through PA40.
    Added below code in V_T588z (0000):
    I have added 186,188 Lines.Other lines are standard thing.
                  04     180     P     PSPAR-MASSN='10'/X  **Termination
                  04     181     P     PSPAR-MASSN='ZB'/X **Termination
                  04     182     P     PSPAR-MASSN='14'/X  **Termination
                  04     185     I     COP,41,,,(PSPAR-BEGDA),(PSPAR-ENDDA)/D
                  04     186     W     P0041-DAR11='13' **BEGIN & END OF CRA01670 CODE ***
                  04     188     W     P0041-DAR11='' **BEGIN & END OF CRA01670 CODE ***
    Issue :
    1. The above logic is not working for Finland ,other countries. For only India it is working.
    2. Some times Date type-13 is coming twice while through the Infogroup-0041 screen twice,which is incorrect. The infotype-0041 should call only once.I have checked the User parameters,MOLGA,USR. But it is not working.
    2. The standard configuration Date type -09-Last day of work - is working fine . But i could not be able to find ,from where it is coming.I have checked the Dynamic actions,but no use.
    Need your inputs to solve the issue.
    Thanks,
    N.L.Narayana

    P     P0000-MASSN='01'    Action type
    P                   P0000-MASSG="01"   Action Reaosn
    P     T001P-MOLGA='40'
    F                   here u will keep the Call Routine
    I     INS,2001,,,(P0000-BEGDA),(P0000-ENDDA)/D  (here u have pass the date of Call routine )
    W     P2001-IAWRT='01'
    But here Infotype 2001 we will give Absence type this IT is used for Booking Absence Types i did not get the Wage type 8001
    thru which IT are u processing it
    for more info Checjk Tabvke V_T588Z  here iam pasteing the sample call routine which i got from earlier thread
    Create a Program (Subroutine) using SE38. Save and activate it.
    ZZSY_DYA_TEST2
    REPORT ZZSY_DYA_TEST2.
    tables : p0000,p0001,rp50d.
    FORM getdate.
    rp50d-date1 = p0000-begda + 90.
    ENDFORM.
    FORM get_date.
    rp50d-date2 = p0000-begda + 180.
    ENDFORM.

  • MGE - issues with pers. actions for delegation in ECC6.0 - management of global employees

    Hi experts,
    during implementation of MGE at my client we are facing issues with the personnel actions for delegation.
    We were using the standard actions as follows, without success.
    action Expatriation planning (81), IG 92 via PA40 --> new persno. has been created successfully, empl. status has been set to withdrawn, IT715 "host" has been set to "planned", IT710 has been filled (required fields only, no admin, no manager, no sending pers. assignment info), all payroll relevant ITs have been skipped (706 + 707)
    IT715 has been set to "to be activated" via PA30
    running of report RPMGE_Activation for newly created persno.(assignment nr), pers. action 82 Activation in host country, IG GE --> following ISSUES occure:
    Action can not be executed via PA40 (is this normal behaviour?)
    when running with report, employm. status changed to active
    IT715 "host" has not been changed updated in status (should have been updated to "in progress", right?)
    IT715 "home" has not been created (correct?)
    IT710 has not changed
    Background information:
    > Switch MAINS is activated
    > We are not going to use global payroll! No switch has been activated. Payroll will always run in home country, so the client does not want to use any of the py relevant ITs dealing with global employment.
    Many thanks + best wishes,
    Evelyn

    Hi experts,
    short update on our issue:
    After several times of trying the same thing, the report worked out fine as it should for 82 and also in the next step for 83. IT715 is going to be updated correctly. We need to work with the report and not with PA40.
    Some open questions remain:
    - Set home assignment to active during delegation (not to inactive for payroll reasons in home country)
    Documentation for RPMGE_Activation says
    Home Activation (Active) (84)
    Same process as described above, excpet that in the third step, the Employment Status field in infotype Action (0000) is set to Active if there are any trailing payments in the home country.
    We understand that 84 is identical to 83 but employment status is different.
    For action 84 a different IG is underlying (93) than for 83 (GE) and also it is called "Change expat.planning". The Action does not seem to work with the report as well.
    >> Is this correct? Do we need to create our own Home Activation (Active) Action by coping 83, changing the employment status setting?
    How do we need to configure Feature ACTCE then? EXPATACTHOME would need to have 2 entires at the end, no?
    - End of delegation
    Which actions are used for end of delegation? Are there standard once that we could not find?
    We would like to set the host country to withdrawn and the home country back to active (also change of employee group in this case).
    Also using the logic of IT715, is there any automatic way of changing the host country record to status completed, or would we use an exit action, including IT715 and set status manually?
    Same question for home country.
    Many Thanks,
    Evelyn

  • Issue with JSF action method and Popup

    All,
    I have command Button, which has an action method. And my onclick function opens new popup. Once I close the popup, it has to return some values to the parent page and then my action method has to be executed.
    Issue is if I close the popup, nothing is happening in parent page.
    In my JavaScript if I return true, popup is opening and my action method is executing. But my expected behavior is after closing popup then only my action has to be executed.
    Thanks,
    Dhana

    Hi all,
    I came back to this today (after almost 2 years)... the current version of facestrace doesn't require a taglib at all: http://code.google.com/p/primefaces/downloads/list
    Just drop it in WEB-INF/lib, add *.jsf to the url mappings for the faces servlet. Then whenever you add trace=true to your URL, you get a nice dump of information there.
    Best,
    John

  • Issues with POWL action buttons and row selection after Support Packs

    We recently applied ECC 603 Support Stack 16 to our environment and are having problems with some SAP standard POWL lists (example is KYKOP-OPS-MM-PO-W: Purchase Orders for Goods Receipt).  In fact all of the POWL lists that we are using are behaving the same way.  There are 2 changes that have happened after moving to this stack.
    1.  In order to select a row in the list, we now have to press ctrl + click, previously, just clicking the the row would select it and fire the OnLeadSelection
    2.  All of the Action Buttons in the POWL lists are disabled.
    I have debugged the Feeder Class /KYK/CL_MM_FEEDER_PO and see in th GetActions method and see that the ls_actions-enabled is getting set to true, but for some reason the buttons are disabled when the list is rendered.
    I've checked a side-effects report from OSS and have come up empty handed.  Has anyone else run into this?
    Eric

    I have found an OSS note that addresses this problem.  This problem will effect anyone who is using ALV for ABAP WebDynpro after applying BASIS Support Pack 20 for 7.0.  The OSS note is 1363334.  Question Answered.

  • Photoshop CS6 'threshold' issue in the actions.

    after 13.02, the 'threshold' cannot be executed in the actions.

    Good day!
    And after the 13.0.4 update?
    Also what happens exactly? Is there an error message, does the Action stop, …?
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • Issue in recruitment actions -SOS

    Dear All,
    Our client is not interested in using the standard SAP recruitment actions.So we have configured the actions according to clients requirement.
    I can only do  Initial entry of basic data action.
    when i tried to do other actions its giving the following message
    applicant 0000068 already exists(initial entry of action not allowed)
    Can any body explain where the problem lies.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Ananya.K

    Hi Kumar
    configure the feature     PINCH (Administrator groups ) with u r admn group
    Regards
    kiran
    Edited by: kiranessmss on Oct 25, 2010 7:03 AM

  • Issue with Corrective Action Deletion Log

    Hi
    I am working on Corrective Actions of Audit Management. Whenever a Corrective Action is deleted, none of the related tables stores the deleted information. You can not retrieve historical data from tables once a corrective action is deleted. Unlike some other activities, there is no deletion flag set. Instead the record is removed from all the related tables. Is there any other way to retrieve the deleted records information from tables?
    Thanks and Regards
    Murali

    Hi,
    Better you can manage archival & deletion of audit components using some preprocessing programs
    For instance PLM_AUDIT_ARC_AUD_DELETE.This will give you the detailed log.
    Please check SARA transaction for the set up.
    REgards
    Keerthi

  • Issue regarding cell action in webdynpro for abap alv

    hello gurus,
           i have one requirement in webdynpro for abap alv.i have one alv table in that i have one coloun employee name.
    for that i have provided F4 help and that is editable field.if i select value from F4 help it is getting value correctly and it is showing properly at the same time it is allowing values entered manually insted of from F4 help.but as per my requiremnet it should not allow any manually entered values.how can i get this functinality. i am not aware indepth od WDA.
    could you go through my isssue and could you revert me some solution.
    thanks in advance.

    Hi,
       I dont think this is possible because when you can change the value using F4 then it would obviously be
       possible to enter manually.
       You can try using a drop down instead because in drop down you cannot enter values manually,
       But this would be good if the values that can be shown in drop down are very low, if the values are more
       then again user will face problems selecting values.
       Else you can try out what srinivas suggested, But dont know whether we can have two cell editors at a time
       inside a single cell of ALV. Please post the answer if you have found any other way to do it.

  • OBIEE 11g Action Link translation issue

    Hi All,
    I have a translation issue with the Action links in OBIEE 11.1.1.5 version.
    The pop-up which is displayed on clicking the column having action link is not getting translated. This seems to be the issue with all the action links.
    All other catalog objects, captions etc are translated properly.
    Has anyone faced similar issues ? Is there a workaround for this ?
    Thanks for any pointers.

    Action links are not getting translated. I faced a similar problem in OBIEE 11.1.1.6 version.
    What you can do is replace that action link with a 'link or image' option in dashboard objects.
    'Link or Image' types of object get translated in OBIEE 11.1.1.5 as well as OBIEE 11.1.1.6 version.
    hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for