Issue in Reprocessing Incorrect Confirmations

Hi Folks,
I have a issue were i work on CO16N to reprocess incorrect confirmations i have a list of 40 production orders , and i choose to process in batch of 5 and execute , i get system dump since the transaction times out and dump error . When my co worker tries to execute CO16N it executes with out getting timed out . To narrow  down i logged with my Id in his sytem and tried, even then i failed , it timed out , so nothing to do with syetem issue . When my friend logged in my system and executed it did execute , very confusing . Has anybody come across this kind of issue , if so pls help..
Points will be rewarded.

Hi Pearls,
It seem some authorization objects are not assigned to your used ID.
Please consult with your BASIS consultant. You can compare the Roles/Profiles of your ID and your friend ID.
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Similar Messages

  • IW46 (Reprocessing incorrect confirmations) : edit parameters

    Hi,
    When running IW46 , the result screen shows data for all the plants.
    I would like to have a way to sort data for a specific plant : on the result screen , in the menu path : 'Edit/Parameters'  is not active , is there a configuration to be done to activate that?
    Thanks,
    Pete

    No standard solution...

  • Posting period issue while deleting a confirmation posted for a limit PO

    Hi ..
    I am facing an issue whiel deleting a confirmation posted for a limit PO.
    Confirmation was posted for a limit PO in SRM and it created a service entry sheet in SAP. If I deleted that confirmation in the same posting period, then it is getting deleted. No issue here.
    But if I deleted that confirmation in the next posting period then the reversal document is going to error in process. RZ20 is showing the error "Positng only possible in periods 2012/2 and 2012/3".
    Posting date of reversal document is current date only and the backend posting period is 2012/3, but still it is failing with this posting period error.
    If I tried to delete a confirmation posted for a normal PO then I could able to delete it even in next posting period by just changing the posting date.
    Why this posting occurs while deleting the limit confirmation, even through the posting date is falls within the backenn posting periiod? Is it like, SAP system is trying to delete the service entry sheet in original posting period? Kindly help.
    I am in SRM 5.0 (server 5.5) SP12.
    Thanks,
    Arun

    OK.
    Well, if the variable is not used in any interval selection, then I would say "something happened to it".
    I would make a copy of the query and run it to check if I get the same problem with period 12.
       -> If not, something is wrong in the original query (you can proceed as below, if changes to original are permitted).
    If so, then try removing the variable completely from the query and hardcode restriction to 12.
       -> If problem still persists, I would have to do some thinking.
    If problem is gone, then add the variable again. Check.
       -> If problem is back, then the variable "is sick". Only quick thing to do, is to build an identical variable and use that one.
    If problem also happens with the new variable, then it's time to share this experience with someone else and consider raising an OSS.
    Good luck!
    Jacob
    P.S: what fisc year variant are you using?
    Edited by: Jacob Jansen on Jan 25, 2010 8:36 PM

  • RU255 : No incorrect confirmations were founds

    Dear Experts,
    When a user log him on the system, the information message "RU255 No incorrect confirmations were founds" appear automatically, before to become on the SAP Menu.
    I've found the transactions CN30 (project) or IW36 (maintenance&services) which have the same effect (Sales -> Product cost by sales order -> Actual posting -> time sheet -> Transfer -> Post processing confirmations)
    Can someone explain me the reason of the apparition of this message at this time and how can I prevent it without a desactivation with transaction SE91?
    Thanks a lot for your assistance.
    herieric

    Hello Mr Lakshmipathi,
    Thanks for your answer.
    We are actually working on version ECC6.0. This note is dated from 2002 and is not precisely relevant with my problem.
    I've also see the note 370387 (2001 but more relevant), but the problem isn't solved yet.
    If you have an another idea... thanks in advance.
    Regards.
    herieric

  • Performance issues while accessing the Confirm/Goods Services' transaction

    Hello
    We are using SRM 4.0 , through Enterprise Portal 7.0.
    Many of our users are crippled by Performance issues when accessing the Confirm/Goods Services tab( Transaction bbpcf02).
    The system simply clocks and would never show the screen.
    This problem occurs for some users all the time, and some users for some time.
    It's not related to the User's machine as others are able to access it fast using the same machine.
    It is also not dependent on the data size (i.e.no . of confirmations created by the user).
    We would like to know why only some users are suffering more pronouncedly, and why is this transaction generally slower than all others.
    Any directions for finding the Probable cause will be highly rewarded.
    Thanks
    Kedar

    Hi Kedar,
    Please go through the following OSS Notes:
    Note 610805 - Performance problems in goods receipt
    Note 885409 - BBPCF02: The search for confirmation and roles is slow
    Note 1258830 - BBPCF02: Display/Process confirmation response time is slow
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

  • HT1657 Last night I rented a movie successully (Argo) but it would not download. Support was called and I was advised that it was probably an internet speed issue. This was confirmed when I did a speed test as suggested. They now want to sell me some soft

    Last night I rented a movie successully (Argo) but it would not download. Support was called and I was advised that it was probably an internet speed issue. This was confirmed when I did a speed test as suggested. They now want to sell me some software for $40.00. Help

    Hi,
    No, it was Apple. Last night the movie (Argo) was downloaded. It took   about an hour, however it did  not open.
    I can watch the preview, but can't open it.
    Thanks for your interest.
    George

  • One issue regarding PPDS OP.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system

    Dear Experts
    we met a BAPI function issue regarding PPDS Operation.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system.
    scenario is as following:
    we want to build the interface between PPDS and non-SAP system, regarding OP. and order confirmation inbound processing.
    now we input simulated inbound date and test using BAPI: BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFOPRMULTI
    but we find a problem, even we set different value for fields ‘ duration’ in function. after call BAPI, It didn't reflect the 'net duration' or 'remaining duration', these fields not changed through check in Tcode:/SAPAPO/RRP3 for single operation.
    In the meanwhile , but it works for fields 'confirmed Yield' and fields 'confirmed Scrap' for single operation.
    my questions is that: if we need to synchronize the operation confirmation( including confirmed yield,confirmation scrap, duration)，do we use the correct BAPI for this or do we need an additional BAPI, please hints.
    Thanks a lot! any feedback would be welcome!
    Best Regards
    Kevin

    Hi Kevin,
    Yes you use the right BAPI.
    you have to use table OPERATION_CONFIRMATION.
    You cannot just set the duration. You have to trigger time event confirmations.
    The field duration according to the documentation currently not supported.
    You need to use CONFIRMATION_TYPE
    0100 Start of Setup
    0150 End of setup
    0200 Start of processing
    0300 Partially complete
    0350 Complete
    Not sure if all confirmation types are supported by the BAPI.
    You can also set start and end time but not sure either whether it is supported or not.
    Regards,
    Uli

  • Incorrect confirmation need to be reprocess.

    Hello,
    We have a problem today, In CO16N, I get the following message on a confirmation information (Confirmations have been entered at operation level for order 10001586).Can you please explain what this means, because Iu2019ve never had this message before? Can this confirmation be deleted without any consequences? Or is there be some modification needed somewhere else?
    Thanks

    Dear,
    This meassge come if you have already confirmed the order at operation level (COR6N ) and next time you are trying to confirm at header level.You can check this in operation overview tab for all operations with status or you can check it in CORT.
    please check and come back.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    Edited by: R Brahmankar on May 27, 2009 1:29 PM

  • Issue with page processing - confirmation message & show /hide a button..

    Hello,
    I am working on a to do list application.
    I have events and for each event, I show list of tasks (grouped in reports based on the calculated task's status).
    In one region I have a drop down list of events and a Select Event button.
    For each task, I had to create a CLOSE option (initially I used a link, but the requester wanted a confirmation before closing the task).
    Now I have a checkbox for each task (generated dynamically with apex_item.checkbox(1,task_id)).
    Closing a task in my application means to set the end_date to sysdate.
    I followed the instructions from
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31036_01/doc/appdev.22/b28839/check_box.htm#CEGEFFBD. I've created also a button and a process and updated the sql from "delete" to "update".
    The process is set: OnSubmit - After Computations and Validations; Run Process Once per page visit (default).
    The issue number 1 is that I see the confirmation message (that tasks have been closed) every time I reload the page (the same when I click Select_event button).. not only after I press on that Close_task button..
    For issue number 2, I have to mention that I've added a condition to show / hide the Close_task button, only if I have at least 1 task in the report.
    The issue number 2 is that I see the button only if I click 2 times on the Select_Event button.. The same is for hide.
    I feel like I am missing something very important about how to synchronize different events(buttons clicks), processes..
    help..?
    Thank you!
    Anca

    This forum is magic..
    As soon as write here, I find the answer!
    Issue 1: I fixed it by specifying this: When Button Pressed (Process After Submit When this Button is Pressed) and my button. I miseed this 1st time.
    Issue 2: I moved the button after the report.. and now it's working just fine!
    I did this about it for some time before asking the question here.. but I just had to write here and got the right answer ;)
    Have a nice day!
    Anca

  • Goods Issue Production Order for Confirmed Qty Component

    Dear PP Gurus,
    Here is my case :
    Stock Qty for Sparepart A : 100 un
    First production will require 80 un A, and availability check confirmed. Second Production Order will require 70 un A, where 20 un confirmed and 50 un is not confirmed on availability check. When i try to goods issue the second production order, it is allowed to consumed all 70 un because unrestricted stock is 100. How can i forbid goods issue in second production order only for 20 un A which is confirmed before.
    Thanks,
    Arman Lie

    Dear
    First of all what ever qty u release during production it well get copied in confirmation so as u said first production order is 80 so the balance qty is 20 out of 100 units so for 20 production order is confirmed so u need another production order for 70 in that case u have deflicit stock of 50 so for that reason ur production order not get confirmed for 50 in order to confirm this order u need t make a stock of 50.
    1. check in the OPK4 enable the actual qty
    2.check t-code OPJK Checking Rule and check when material availability when saving the order
    and please check in the material master what availability check u have maintained in mrp
    [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/cf/70124adf2d11d1b55e0000e82de178/frameset.htm]
    With Regards
    Pushpalas

  • ICal sync issues (times are incorrect)

    Hi guys
    I am having some strange issues with iCal at the moment. As you can see below when I send out invities people are receiving two seperate times in the body of the email, and in the ics attachement.
    I have done some browsing and can confirm the following:
    1/ All my calendars (iCloud, iCal) are set to Singapore timezone as well as having Time Zone support ON
    2/ My iPhone is set to Time Zone support on and to Singapore time
    Screenshot of the email attached.
    Any help or suggestions are much appreciated.

    you may want to check your time settings on your macpro first: system preference>date&time>time zone... make sure you have the right time zone and city, then in system preference>date&time>date&time... check "set date & time automatically".
    then in ical: ical>preferences>advanced, make sure you have "Turn on time zone support" selected.
    finally on the iphone: settings>general>date&time, make sure you have time zone support selected and the right time zone/city.
    hope this helps.

  • 10.9.2 update sleep issue with NEC monitors confirmed

    After updating from Mac OS10.9.1 to 10.9.2, both my friend, who lives in another city, and I find that attempting to put our MacPros (2010, think his is a 2009 model) attached to a NEC PA 301 (mine) or PA 271 (his) series pro monitors to sleep experience a frozen screen and cursor followed about a minute later with an expected and desired sleep mode. My computer does something slightly different than his in that the background of the dock turns a golden yellow when the screen freezes. Both systems start up from sleep correctly.
    If I only use my Apple 30 inch Cinema Display, the sleep mode works as expected.
    Spent two hours with Apple Care (level one and level two) people that didn't have a clue what was going on. Called NEC and they had no explaination.
    Any thoughts of wisdom of what is going on with the sleep issue that occurred right after we put the 10.9.2 update?

    Andrew,
    This is not an AppleCare issue, it is an Apple bug that you didn't want and  will be addressed by AppleCare representatives. Your are helping out the communnity.  If they don't believe you, refer them to this discussion. They never tell you about the 90 day software exception clause for free techsupport when one updates to a major MacOS change. I found that sending in a known bug where many people are experiencing it through AppleCare where they end up uploading your OS data to their engineers gets more attention than going to Apple.com/feedback. The more people who report it, the quicker it gets addressed.
    As far as going back to 10.9.1, didn't you do a back-up before you did an Apple "fix" that you can go back to? My problem is that every day my calendar, documents, email, etc change a lot so I am reluctant to go back to my back-up which I hate to say is only on TimeMachine now. My other backups (mirror copies) occur nightly and I didn't notice this bug till a day later.
    You pay good money for only quality equipment so a wierd bug like this should not occur on a little update.
    I have reported this to Apple and NEC but need others to light a fire under those in charge to make a change and not have us wait for one or two updates later.
    If you want to request NEC to jump in to getting this fixed, send a message to the NEC monitor product manager (Art Marshall): [email protected]

  • Issue with process order confirmation

    Hi,
      I m doing the testing of SAP EHP4 To EHP6 up-gradation. I tried to confirm process order XXXXXX with T-code COR6N.
    In this process order there 2 phase for 2 activity. Now when I entered the order in COR6N I click on enter its automatically taken 2nd phase.
    Its by-pass the first phase. I have to confirm the 1st phase but its not showing.
    Please let me know where is the problem ...what configuration i m missing.
    Thanks,
    Anurudh

    Hi PP guru,
    Thanks all of you replay my problem is resolve now. 2nd phase not showing there because confirmation is possible but not necessary so when I click on f4 its not showing.  I entered it manually after that it taken it and showing activity also.
    So thank u friend once again.
    Thanks
    anurudh

  • Urgent : Issue with Pop to confirm

    l_popup = l_window_manager->create_popup_to_confirm(
      text = str_table
      button_kind = 1
      message_type = 1
    close_button =  'X'
      window_title = 'Confirmation'
      window_position = if_wd_window=>co_center ).
    Here is my code to show pop to confirm screen. I want OK pop up so i used the value "1" for button_kind parameter but i get this runtime error saying
    "No Button 7 Is Defined for Popup POPUP_TO_CONFIRM"
    even after passing the value as 1 iam not able figure out why the system is taking the valye as 7. can someone please give me an immediate solution for this.
    Thanks,
    Suri

    Hi,
    i tried with same thing in m y system and it is working .
    Do one thing :
         <b>Check the fixed values in the domain of WDR_POPUP_BUTTON_KIND.</b>
    whether 1 is defined for ok.
    Madhu

  • Issues with Reprocess Idoc

    Hi all,
    The developement for BOM interface is done.
    it is working fine.But my client extented requirement like this
    after processing IDOC , if there is any status 51 idocs available.
    he will do reprocess from BD87. that time some part of code in FM needs to be triggered.
    I am not able make Difference b/w first IDOC number and Reprocess IDoc number.
    means for keeping conditon , i need one unique differenet between new IDOC and Reprocess IDOC.
    Is there any point to know that properties.
    thanks in Advance,
    regards,
    JBR

    Hi,
    Reprocessing a idoc would not create a new IDoc, only the status of the IDoc would be changed if the error with which it was already occuring has been modified.
    Thanks
    Krithika

Maybe you are looking for