Issue in settlement of WBS to Asset under construction
I had created new WBS elements to projects and tried to settle the values in the WBS element to Auc at the end of period 12.
Instead of settling to Auc acquisition account specified in account determination in asset accounting, the values are trying to settle to downpayment clearing account specified in the asset accounting.
Can you tell me how I should correct that.
When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA.
Similar Messages
-
Settlement of WBS element down payments to an asset under constructions
The down payment (of the transactions tcode F-47 and tcode F-110), are
always settlement wbs element (tcode CJ88), we do not want to post down
payments to the receiving asset under construction (transaction type
180 or 181).
In the down payments are always taken into account in the settlement to
an asset. The settlement of the down payment is the actual reason for
the previous update of down payments in FI (Transaction type group
15). Furthermore, the settlement of down payments to assets should
not be capitalize.When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA. -
Hi,
The issue is as follows:
User has capitalized an expense which was earlier been booked under WBS in March 2007.
On 13.12.2007, they have received a credit note & booked under relevant WBS but not yet settled to asset, so there is a balance lying in AUC account on 31.12.2007 till now, now user wants to settle those WBS over asset.
Note:1. Fiscal year 2007 (Jan to Dec) & 2008 has already been closed & dep. has been posted accordingly.
2. We are on SAP 4.6C version & IM module has been implemented here
Now I am running CJ88 transaction in 2009 for period 11 to settle this WBS to asset but getting the following error:
"Transaction in area 01 contradicts the net book value rule
Message no. AA 660
Diagnosis
The document cannot be posted, as it is contrary to the net book value rule which is checked in area 01.
Procedure
This error usually occurs when you enter proportional values. The proportional values exceed the amount posted, for example, post capitalization of 100 but proportional depreciation to the amount 110. Check your entries and correct them if necessary."
Can anybody suggest me about feasible steps for solving this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj AgarwalWhen you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA. -
WBS Elements and Asset Under Constructions have different Cost Centers
Hello Experts,
We have created a WBS element in one of the projects.
As per standard process, when we create the WBS Element the Asset under construction is also getting created through the settlement rule within the WBS.
These assets should have the same Cost Center as the WBS has. However we are in a situation wherein the Cost Center in the asset under construction is different than the Cost Center in the WBS.
I have checked the settings like automatic account assignment, etc but all settings look correct.
Can you please explain first what could be the reason for such a difference between Cost Centers in WBS and AuC's and what is the solution to avoid it in future?
Thanks in advance
LeenaThanks for your replies...
@ Alex - There is no Investment Programme ID maintained for this WBS in question since there is no IM for this project.
@ Abdul - Please elaborate more on Validation and Substitution.
Regards,
Leena. -
Settlement of Asset Under construction
Hi Folks
Can someone please explain an overview of settling Assets under construction. I am having some issues with AUC. The actual value of asset is being taken from AUC, not from final asset. Any kind of assistance will be highly appreciated.Hi,
The Below are some important Steps.
1. T.code KO88 - Here you settle Expences to Settlement cost Elements via internal Order or Cost Centers. Give the Settlement rule and by tht Expences will be distrubuted or settled to SCE..
2. In AIAB T.code -Here Distrubution is done from Settlement Cost Elements to AUC, Here settlement rule is defined as such.
3. In AIBU T.code - Here Settlement if Cost from AUC to Actual Asst is Done.
after AIBU Transcation is Processed, you can directly run the Deprecation for tht Asset.
Hope the above would Help in Understanding the Concept of AUC Settlements.
Thanks
Goutam -
Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element message no cj824
Hi,
i am getting error message when i change dates in activities.
Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element
Message no. CJ 824
i have checked related post but did not find any solution. also check SAP Note but not related to my issue.
Please guide.
thanks
SunilHi Ken,
Please check below screens:
according to this error message AUC has some missing field or some incorrect value. but when i checked via program RAUNVA00 which will display
Incomplete Assets - Detail List.
but this program does not return any incompleteness.
i found many threads and SAP Not but none of is related to my program. this problem comes when i change dates in activity and save the project.
Please suggest what to do now.
thanks
Sunil -
Settlement of Assets under Construction - Error Message
Dear Friends,
In one of the Co, Codes we are using the Category FXA to settle the assets under construction and when we define the Asset No. in the Settlement Receiver, the system gives the error message " Receiver Categ. G/L is not allowed by Settlement Prof. AI for this sendor". Message No. KD031.
It is not understood why the system is referring to the GL when we are putting in the Asset No. as the Settlement Receiver. However, in other Company Code we are not facing this problem. What could be the issue and what do we need to check.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,Hi Raj
posting to Asset, also posts to FI-GL i.e. the recon account.. hence, system might be asking to allow GL
If your settl receiver is FXA, settlement will be made to that only.. Dont worry on that front
Regards
Ajay M -
Settlement of an Internal Order to Asset Under Construction
We are running SAP 4.7 and Iam trying to settle an Internal order to AUC and I get the following error
You cannot use this transaction type to post to this asset
Message no. AA834
Diagnosis
The transaction type entered belongs to transaction type group 15. According to the specifications for this transaction type group, posting with transactions types belonging to this group are only allowed in specific asset classes (for example, asset classes for assets under construction).
The asset to which you are posting belongs to class 18000 (chart of depreciation SEEF). You cannot post to this class using the transaction type you have entered.
Procedure
Check the asset number entered. You may want to allow posting with this transaction type group for the asset class of the asset.
**Please take note that the costs which have come on the internal oder are through GR( Goods receipt) and not down payment. Also note that last month, the order settled without any problems!**Hi,
thanks for your answer.
I want to do that because of some french tax rules.
These rules say that goods, hours or services produced internally for the contruction of an asset can be "delivered" to itself.
So you can register output tax based on the value produced but you have also to register input tax for the same amount.
Finally the balance for VAT amount is 0.
I was interested to know if that was possible to automize. If not, there is still the possibility to make a separate postings at month end or year end.
Best Regards -
Asset Under Constructions - Settlement
Dear Gurus,
I am trying to do an Asset Under Construction - Settlement using T.Code AIBU, when i click on proceed, it gives me an error:
SYST: You cannot determine the period for rule 02 to 12/31/07
Message no. AA613
Diagnosis
The system could not determine depreciation periods on 12/31/07 for period control 02 of calculation key 0000.
What to do
Maintain the allocation of the periods for the period control you entered.
Proceed
If the period control you entered is a standard period control, you can set up the allocation of periods automatically.
Procecd
Could you guide me through this...
Thanks in advance for your help.
regards,
RajHi,
Please check
Note 357375 - Settlement: AA613 for AuC intracompany transfer
There are two possibilities how to solve this problem:
a. Define period control 02 with Transactions OA84 or OAVH.
b. If you work with self-defined period controls, you can enter another period control instead of 02 in depreciation key 0000.
Rgds. -
Asset Under Construction(AUC),During month end settlement run(via KO8G)
Hi Guys ,
please hlep on this AUC :
During month end settlement run (via tcode KO8G), if there are -ve (credit) values to be settled to an Asset Under Construction (AUC) asset which does not have sufficient +ve value in the current FY, the settlement run will prompt an error message "Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01". The TT posted via the settlement run is TT115. To get around, user has to raise a manual journal (via doc type AT) to post the -ve value to the same AUC asset via TT101. TT 115 and 101 are configured differently (see attached).
Since the Fixed Assets system does accept credit posting to AUC via a journal, is there a solution to make posting go through via the settlement run?
Regards,
NarraYou can settle the AUC value in one period and posting can be made in another period. in the same you can give the different asset value date in KO88 screen. The only limitation is this possible only if the fiscal year is same.
Give the asset value date as 15.07.2007 in KO88
Hope this will work
Radha -
Settlement from internal order to asset under construction
HI All,
I have allocated some labors hours cost from production cost centers to real order which is created for allocating the internal cost to asset under construction.
when i allocate the labor hours by using the "KB21N" it has used the secondary cost element that is "Internal activity allocation" cost element "1200002".
i have given the source cost element "1200002" which is created as "internal activity allocation" and in settlement cost elements folder i have given receiving category is "FXA" and selected by cost element check box. i selected required entry field in settlement profile and assigned in order type.
when i do the settlement to asset under construction from internal order it is showing bellow errow.
"Settlement by cost element not possible due to secondary cost element
Message no. KD553
Diagnosis
You want to settle the secondary cost element 1200002 by cost element to an asset or G/L account, which is not allowed.
Procedure
Extend your allocation structure R3, so that secondary cost elements are not settled by cost element, but with a settlement cost element."
please let me know the problem and where i did mistake. give me the solution
thanks in advance
Mr.RaoHI,
in your allocation structure R3 you entered in the view "Settlement cost element" that settlement receiver categoy FXA receives values "by cost element". This is only possible for primary cost elements. For internal activities do not tick "by cost element" but use a settlement cost element with cost element category "22".
best regards, Christian -
Asset Under Construction Settlement - transaction types 340 & 345
Hi all,
My understanding is that
a) If an Asset Under Construction (AUC) item is settled completely through transaction AIBU, then transaction type 345 is used to credit the AUC GL Account in asset accounting document
b) If an AUC item pertaining to previous fiscal year is settled completely through transaction AIBU in current fiscal year, then transaction type 340 is used to credit the AUC GL Account in asset accounting document
Please confirm if my understanding is correct.
Also, please clarify, which is the program or configuration which proposes transaction type 340 or 345 for AUC settlement accounting document. I understand that transaction type 340 or 345 can't be entered manually & they are automatically determined by the system at the time of settlement
of AUC through transaction AIBU.Hello
The transaction types posted with AIBU are defined in the IMG:
Financial Accounting > Asset Accounting > Transactions > Intercompany Asset Transfers > Automatic Intercompany Asset Transfers > Define Transfer Variants
Transfer variant used in this case is number 6.
They are also used for settlement purposes. And it is really important their definition regarding dependant areas. As the revaluation area.
It is recommended that transfer variants 4, 5 and 6 do have as transfer method 4. You can check this information in the following SAP notes 300273 and 327088.
Regards
Javier Reviriego -
Asset Under Construction Settlement
Hi ,
Asset under Construction Settelement is it a month end activity ?
If it is a month end activity what are the reasons?
If it is not month end activity , why?
if Settlement is posible in between the period what are all the effects in sap?
Please reply me
Regards,
LaxmiHi
You can settle from AUC to Main asset at any time during the month and any no of times... No -ve consequences.. However, it is advisable to schedule it at month end... Other wise, you would be generating more no of docs due to multiple settlements to the same asset
However, if you are settling from an Internal Order to AUC / Main Asset - In that case prefer it to be a month end activity.....
Br, Ajay M -
Asset Under Construction Issue
Hi,
I am facing problems while settling of Auc.
I created one asset with asset class of AuC. In Auc master i have given the Capex order type's internal order. After i posted few entries for Order. while entering of fi entries to order i didn't selected any asset number just i posted the fi entries with 40 and 50 posting key.
After i settled the order in KO88. It was settled.
After i run AIBU t code then system is saying no line items existed for order.
Without line items how can i settle the order.
Please explain me from start to end of Auc Settlement Process and Converting to asset of Auc. It is very very very urgent for me.
SateeshHi
This works like this:
First we create Asset class for asset under construction with investment measure.
Assign GL accounts to that asset class
Create one asset master under that asset class
create secondary cost element with catagory external settlement.
create internal order type and select settlement with assets are optional.
create internal order
post entries to internal order
that particular internao order will capture the total cost for particual asset under construction.
once you finished that construction you will settle to one asset or multiple assets using external secondary cost element in assessment cycle. -
New Depreciation Area in Asset Master Data, for assets under construction.
Hi,
The issue is relating to New Depreciation area. We have created new Depreciation area as 80=IFRS. We had followed three steps
1. Create Depreciation area via OADB.
2. Activate Depreciation area via OAYZ.
3. Automatic opening of new depreciation are via AFBN and program RAFABNEW :-
3.1 u2013 Indicator: Leave values initial = ticked. Set this indicator if you want to open the newly created depreciation area without any values i.e. blank.
In this we have find that the old assets value has been copied. But when we are doing internal order settlement through KO88 i.e. from pre-cap to AUC we are not finding new Depreciation area 80=IFRS in AUC. We had checked in AW01N.
Letu2019s assume that creating a new deprecation area is normally not required since these assets are not depreciated. But During the final settlement, the new depreciation area should also automatically supplied with values from the reference depreciation area from the AUC(assets under construction) in the completed assets. But we doesnu2019t find any values of in Dep Key = 80 IFRS for final assets.
In Assets Class of AUC we had used Investmnet Measure as Status of AUC.
Kindly provide solution for the same.
NikhilCheck Transfer Variant 5 (under Transactions->Intercompany Asset Transfers->Automatic Intercompany Asset Transfers->Define Transfer Variants):
5 Investment measure settlement
Your Transfer Method is most likely 1 now (without transfer to dependant areas), change it to:
4 Gross method with transfer of values to dependent areas
This should help.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Since I updated my itunes I can no longer burn a playlist to disc using MP3 format. I clicked on converting the songs to mp3 format but they still won't burn to disc. The computer says it is checking media and then stops.
-
I bought a iPhone 6 16 GB i OS 8.1.2 last week. A software upgrade to i OS 8.1.3 was downloaded to my phone automatically. I taped install now and the phone went to a window verifying update. Then after the verifying window another window came up and
-
JLabel with HTML visible only for the first time
I've implemented a really simple applet: public class TestApplet extends JApplet { @Override public void init() { try { SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(new Runnable() { public void run() { JPanel topPanel = new JPanel();
-
Still can not get songs to delete from library.....
I have read through the forums..made sure to try every option available..still I can not get songs to delete from library. Help!!
-
OMG OMG OMG....CAN SOME1 PLEASE HELP?!
So this morning, I grabbed my ipod and turned it on to listen to 311's "Amber" cause it was stuck in my head and all I heard was this blantantly loud "EEHEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!" over the fading music in the background. I was shocked bec