Issue in system condition

Hi Gurues, Can anybody please tell me what is system condition ? how to use this field. and here my requirement is that iw31, i want to mandatory field "system condition" is there any possibility to do this ? and Why system condition is used ? i have more confusion about this field, please share details about this filed. i am really appreciate for your response ? Best Regards Rajeev

Greetings Rajeev,
You may make the field CAUFVD-ANLZU mandatory in configuration under:
SPRO > Plant Maintenance > Maintenance and Service Processing > Maintenance and Service Orders > Define Field Selection for Order Header Data (PM) > Field Selection for Order Header Data and Reference Object
About your other query, see System condition in PM order

Similar Messages

I have an issue with pricing condition ZPRO (basic price )

Hello gurus
I have an issue with pricing condition ZPRO (basic price ).
users created a sales order, and the basic price ZPRO which is mannual is added twice ,now i want to put a check so that condition tpye zpro is not accepted twice by the system. please let me know how can i restrict system from accepting condition type zpro twice during sales order.
regds
Edited by: sapuser09 on Jul 26, 2011 8:44 AM

Hi,
Solution for this is very simple. Don't make any changes to the sales order user exit. Use condition exclusion for the condition type.
Do customization in the following path of IMG
Sales and distribution---- > Basic Functions--- > Pricing--
> Condition exclusion -- > Condition exclusion for groups of conditions
First In Define condition exclusion groups you have to define condition exclusion group (ZXXX)
Then in Assign condition types to the exclusion groups you have to assign condition type to the exclusion group (ZXXX ZPRO)
Then in Maintain Condition exclusion for pricing procedures select the pricing procedure where you have the problem and click Exclusion box present in Dialog structure box
You will be faced with Change view exclusion overview screen Click new entries
You will be faced with New entries overview of added entries screen.
Take serial no as 10 Condition exclusion procedure as B (Best condition with in condition type) In the exclusion group1 add the exclusion group ZXXX.
Save it and create order.
In the order pricing you will again observe that ZPRO appearing twice but only one will be active.
Changing user exit for this issue is not at all required and it must be only the last resort Try replicating the issue in your sand box system. As I had mentioned it will be picked twice but only one will be active.
Hope this helps.
Edited by: mokirala tilak on Aug 10, 2011 10:19 AM

Issue installing System Update 5.01

Hello all I am having an issue installing System update 5.01. I looked in the logs within the temp directory and it says error 1602 which is user canceled. However, I am not canceling the install. I also tried http://support.microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall that didn't work either.
I'm on a T420 with Windows 7 64bit.
Any ideas?
Thanks for your time

I had similar issues installing 5.01. I believe there is something wrong with the package. Here is how I fixed it:
Download installer from http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/detail.page?LegacyDocID=TVSU-UPDATE
Extract package with 7zip
Copy "Lenovo System Update.msi" to "System Update.msi"
Run setup.exe
For some reason the installer was looking for this file and it wasn't there, perhaps running the installer in silent/unattended mode caused it to exit with the code you mentioned.
I hope this fixes your problem too!

Z77A-GD65 power issue/bad system board?

Looking for advice. I am afraid its a bad board, but some symptoms point at power which also makes no sense.
This is what the WHOLE system should look like.
MSI Z77A-GD65 system board
Intel 3770K 3.5Ghz
Anted Kuhler H20 620
G.Skills RipJaws 16GB 1600Mhz DDR3 F3-14900CL9Q-16GBXL (on the test list)
Asus nVidia GTX 680 video card
OCX Vertex 3 256MB SSD
Seagate 500GB data drive
Razer Lycosa Keyboard
Razer DeathAdder Mouse
Antec Sonata IV case with Neo ECO 620W power supply
It seems to me that 620W should be more than enough. According to my calculations thats roughly 330W of power draw against a 620W powersupply.
I am not currently over clocking.
So what the system does look like is:
If I connect the 500GB drive then windows starts rebooting as soon as the Windows logo comes up.
If I place all four sticks of RAM in the system windows starts rebooting as soon as the Windows logo comes up.
If I leave the 500GB standard sata drive off and only use 3 sticks of RAM... well we get a solid system and I am writing this message on it.
3 sticks of ram appear to work in any 3 slots and allow the system to boot, except 1,3,4. That combo also resulted in the reboots at the windows logo.
I first thought it was RAM, originally I was using Corsair Vengeance. I saw some posts here about people having the same problem, and noted that the Corsiar RAM was not tested and switch to a the tested G.Skill instead.
Any ideas? It does not completely seem like a System board issue, but it certainly should not be power. All heat levels are well within normal and as I said the system works great if I leave off the drive and one stick of RAM.
Thanks guys....

System torn down, and put back together. (Found out I was out of Thrermal Compound, so I had to run to the store to get some.)
No long leads, only 9 stand offs matching each mount point on the systemboard.
Back together... problem is the exact same.
However, back to the hard drive issue. I decided to play with that since I was getting no where with 4 sticks of RAM.
What I have discovered is that with NO sata cable connecting the drive to the system board, if I try to power the two 250GB standard sata drives the system reboots just as the Windows logo should come up.
The fact that this behavior is so close to the RAM behavior... I am back to thinking its a power issue, though system board is still a chance... its just easier to buy a new better power supply than the Antec Neo Power 620 that came with the case. (I have not ever had a problem with Antec before, and will likely just buy one of their higher end power supplies to replace it, but I think I will try it next, just in case.)
I am not seeing any strange behavior power wise as far as any monitor shows... but connecting power to a sata drive that is NOT connected with a sata cable and causing a reboot just screams power at me.
Anymore thoughts today. In the mean time off to play Secret World with just the SSD and two sticks of RAM, which still runs rock solid.

Has anybody had an issue with System State Backups on a Dell PowerEdge R510 Server running Server 2008 R2?

Hi,
We have recently had issues running system state backups on our 2008 R2 Domain Controllers.  They are running on Dell PowerEdge R510 Physical Hardware. Whenever you initiate a system state backup, the Domain Controller becomes unresponsive
forcing us to physically reboot it.   Nothing in the Event logs or the Dell Open Management Hardware Software indicates issues with Phyiscal disks but we can always replicate the issue by starting the system state backup.
The system state backup is initialted as a batch file that runs as a scheduled task.   the commands run are as follows:
WBADMIN START SYSTEMSTATEBACKUP -backupTarget:[drive letter] -quiet
We have 4 Domain Controllers with identical disk configurations. When the DCs were setup I confirmed the system state backups were working but the issue started occuring sometime in Dec 2014. We are going to run the Dell Hardware Update Utility
to update the RAID, BIOS, Firmware updates but Has anyone experienced a similar issue that may have been triggerd by a Microsoft Patch?
Thanks,
Kevin C.
kconway@fnalgov

Hi Kevin,
This issue could be due to the Mountmgr.sys driver incorrectly maintains a global mutex. This behavior causes a deadlock situation in the Mountmgr.sys driver.
Please install the hotfix in the article below to resolve the issue:
A computer stops responding because of a deadlock situation in the Mountmgr.sys driver in running Windows 7 or in Windows Server 2008 R2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2614892
Best Regards,
Mandy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

System Condition is not picked from TL while generating calls from Plan

Hi,
I've marked System condition field at work order header as required.
However, the system doesn't pick up that field from Task List when generating call from maint plan.. that would still be not populated therefore preventing e.g. from bulk release..
Do you know why is that? looks like a system bug or so..

Hi Paul,
I have to revive that topic..
defining system condition as decribed before seems to be working only for work order being called from maintenance plan
on the other hand, for notification generated from plan and then transformed to work orders defining system condition at task list details at item level does not work..
also ,defining system condition at TL header doesn't help (like in order example)..
at the same time, defining system condition at operation level are getting transferred to order with no problem..
do you have an idea?
Thanks in advance

Setting field (system condition) required at work order operation level

Hi everyone,
I wanted to make 'required' system condition field at operation level, however neither it's available in OIOPL nor in OIOPD..
I'd appreciate if anyone could suggest something
Thanks in advance

Hi Sergey,
The System Condition field enables you to reserve capacity in Production Planning Work Center so that during any maintenance, Production Planning work center should not be undergoing any production.
But the system condition that is taken into account for the above scenario is the System Condition field at the header level which indicates whether the maintenance requires the equipment to be shut down or in operation so apart from the header System Condition field, the operation system condition fields do not create any capacity requirement at PP Work Center.
The Operation Sys Condition field is just for reporting purposes and does not hold any significance in PP-PM integration so for that fact there is no provision for setting this field mandatory at Operation level rather it can be set mandatory at Order header level.
Best Regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot

Document for configuring Early watch alerts And issue tracking system

Hello Experts,
Iam on SAP Solution Manager 4.0 and need step wise step procedure document for configuring Early watch alerts and Issue tracking system in solman 4.0 . I hv checked Help site and other standard config docs by SAP but getting confused and things are not working ,so help shall be appreciated.
My Email id is [email protected] .
Requested to revert at earliest as iam in urgent need of it .Points guaranteed.
Thanks and Regards,
Somya

Hi Somya,
setting up EWA is explained in Application help of SAP Solution Manager.
It would be helpful to know, what you have already done and what is causing problems for you.
Prerequisite to process EWA is to configure all steps described in the Basic Settings of SAP Solution Manager Configuration guide (tx SPRO).
The configuration of Issue Tracking is also described in the IMG (Basically, it's required to activate a BC Set).
Path in IMG: Basic Settings -> Standard Configuration of Basic Settings -> Solution Manager -> Basic BC-Sets for Configuration -> Activate Issue Tracking BC Set
Access the configuration guide:
- run transaction SPRO
- choose SAP Reference IMG
- expand tree SAP Solution Manager -> Configuration -> Basic Settings
- follow the steps under
"Wizard-based Initial Configuration of Basic Settings", if your SolMan system has not been yet configured or
"Standard Configuration of Basic Settings", if you have done already some configuration.
Best regards,
Ruediger Stoecker

Develop customer & product attribute system & condition sequencing

Hi,
For our Client, we need to provide inputs on following.
Develop customer & product attribute system & condition sequencing for lead markets
Please advise what all things we should ask regarding this?
Any pointers on this will be highly apperciated.
Thanks
Tushar

Hi,
Any pointers on this please.
Regards
Tushar

Mac mini having issues with system preferences retaining settings

Mac mini having issues with system preferences retaining settings; this was present with Mavericks and now Yosemite after installation. Did try removing com.apple.systemprefs.plist file (library/preferences folder) to trash, but couldn't find it in trash in order to empty it. Upon reboot the file is still missing. Please don't suggest reloading Yosemite, have very slow internet connection, Yosemite took 7-8 hours to D/L.
Any troubleshooting suggestions out there? thanks

Well, I'd open Font Book, it's included with OSX, & see what it says for Validate & Duplicates.
I would also like to add I am new to Apple computers and I'm doing my best to stay up to par with whats what and understanding!
No problem, we were all new to everything once, do let us know if you need more help or clatification.

Oracle HTML DB Tutorial: Building an Issue Tracking System with Oracle XE

Hello.
I am using Oracle XE and have loaded the sample Issue Tracking System.
I had to set the time-out to 100 seconds as explained in the Oracle XE thread: Problem with importing HTML DB applications (Problem with importing HTML DB applications
I am trying to create users.
The documentation at http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/htmldb/pdf/issue_tracking_tutorial_1.6.pdf
on page 82 discusses using HTML DB authentication. However, my understanding is that the HTML DB in Oracle XE currently uses only DATABASE authentication.
Is there any documentation on creating users for the sample Issue Tracking System using Oracle XE?
Thanks!
-Ricky Burke
[email protected]
972-235-5665

Ricky,
I am trying to create users.
The documentation at
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/htmldb/pdf/issue_tracking_tutorial_1.6.pdf
on page 82 discusses using HTML DB authentication. However, my understanding is that
the HTML DB in Oracle XE currently uses only DATABASE authentication.Well, in order to log in to the XE management GUI you use the database account. This is correct.
But for authenticating to the application you are going to build, you still have all possible authentication schemes available as in HTML DB (standalone).
Well, you should be able to just go ahead and create the HTML DB users in your workspace (for example HR). In XE a workspace corresponds to an actual Oracle database user, a workspace is created implicitly for the user.
Thus, just go to Home > Application Builder and will find on the right hand side under "Tasks" the link "Manage HTML DB Users".
There you can create the users in your workspace for your application.
~Dietmar.

Issuing Solaris system calls through Java

How can I issue a system call to Solaris using Java? (i.e. Start a script, open a file, and similar)

Hi Srini,
This is just a suggestion, but try entering the following commands (in your SQL*Plus session) before executing your stored procedure:
set serveroutput on size 1000000
exec dbms_java.set_output(1000000)Hope this helps.
Good Luck,
Avi.

Is There a Public "Bug and Issue Management System" for Strobe Media Playback?

HI all,
Is there a public "Bug and Issue Management System" for Strobe Media Playback? Or is this forum the only officially supported public mechanism for SMP bug reporting and feature requests?
(fyi, I ask in part because SMP is built on top of OSMF, and both projects are led by development teams at Adobe. The OSMF project, however, has fuller level of support including "Bug and Issue Management System" here:
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM )
Thank you to all of the SMP team for this great player!
Best regards,
g

Hi Greg,
Here is our public bug and issue management page:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ST
Thanks for your interest in Strobe Media Playback and for your great articles!
-Andrian

Issue with Freight condition with scales

HI Experts
We have requirement like below.
When customer send an order
o     if the order contains materials for a minimum quantity the system should not apply freight condition
o     if the order contains materials for less than minimum quantity the system should apply freight condition
For example: sales condition freight has scale
     scale qty     unit     amount     unit
From     0     PC     18,3     u20AC
     4     PC     0     u20AC
e.g.1  customer send order that contain 9 PC, so system NOT apply freight condition
material     quantity
x1     1
x2     1
x3     2
x4     5
e.g.2  customer send order that contain 2 PC, so system apply freight condition
material     quantity
x1     1
x2     1
For this we have maintained Group condition and maintained scales up to 3 Order quantity 18 EUR . If order quantity is greater than 4 condition should not apply.
But Now our issue is when ever Material determination is occurring in Order our condition is going to fail. For example order quantity is 2 with TAPA item(parent item) and so substitute Item also 2 quantity (Tan item). In this case system is reading order quantity as 4 and our condition is 0. But actual quantity is 2 condition should apply in Order.
Could you please suggest us where we can control this kind of scenario.
Regards, Lakshmikanth

Done through user exit

VK34, problem of warning issued upon new condition:Reason codes inconsist

Hello,
The Scenario is :
for a given material/sales organisation
1- I create a ZP00 condition value =100$ valid from 01.09.2009 to 31.12.2009
2- I create new ZP00 condition value= 160$ valid from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2999
To day, I decide to change the ZP00 condition value,
3- I created a new ZP00 condition with value=160$ valid from 11.09.2009 to 31.12.2009
The system doesn't issue any warning message to tel me that there is a gap in value between the new condition and the old condition valid for the same period
In fact the system compare the new condition value with the last created condition, hence it doesn't find any difference, and as consequence no warning is issued.
I expect that system compares the new condition value to the condition value valid for the same period and not the last condition
==> Shall I post an OSS for this problem ??
For more details, hereafter the sap code, include MV13AF0K
* Get the Original value (from database) of ZP00 or ZPI1 condition
CLEAR: lv_old_zp00, lv_knumh.
CLEAR: lv_new_zp00, lv_sum_z0xx.
SELECT MAX( knumh ) INTO lv_knumh===> *system looks for the last condition created, it doesn't take care*
    FROM konh                                                      *whether the condition is valide or not*
    WHERE kappl = 'V'
      AND kschl = xkonh-kschl
      AND vakey = xkonh-vakey.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
*   Item data
    SELECT kbetr INTO lv_old_zp00
           UP TO 1 ROWS
      FROM konp
      WHERE knumh = lv_knumh
        AND kschl = xkonh-kschl.
    ENDSELECT.
ENDIF.
* If no old value --> continue the processing without checking the gap
IF NOT lv_old_zp00 IS INITIAL.
*   Calculation of Z0xx conditions sum
    LOOP AT xkonp where knumh = xkonh-knumh AND loevm_ko = space.
      CASE xkonp-kschl.
        WHEN 'ZP00' OR 'ZPI1'.
          MOVE xkonp-kbetr TO lv_new_zp00.
        WHEN 'Z006' OR 'Z008'.
*********Exclusion mode to be defined***********
        WHEN OTHERS.
          IF xkonp-kschl(2) = 'Z0'.
            ADD xkonp-kbetr TO lv_sum_z0xx.
          ENDIF.
      ENDCASE.
    ENDLOOP.
*   Calculation of the gap between the old and the new price
    lv_gap = lv_new_zp00 - lv_old_zp00.
*   If the gap do not correspond to the sum of condition z0xx
*   -> warning popup
    IF lv_gap NE lv_sum_z0xx.
      lv_diff_flag = 'X'. "Set Difference flag
      lv_diff = lv_gap - lv_sum_z0xx.
For more deta

very bad layout, I try to enhance it
The Scenario is :
for a given material/sales organisation
1- I create a ZP00 condition value =100$ valid from 01.09.2009 to 31.12.2009
2- I create new ZP00 condition value= 160$ valid from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2999
To day, I decide to change the ZP00 condition value,
3- I created a new ZP00 condition with value=160$ valid from 11.09.2009 to 31.12.2009
The system doesn't issue any warning message to tel me that there is a gap in value between the new condition and the old condition valid for the same period.
In fact the system compare the new condition value with the last created condition, hence it doesn't find any difference, and as consequence no warning is issued. I expect that system compares the new condition value to the condition value valid for the same period and not the last condition
==> Shall I post an OSS for this problem ??
For more details, hereafter the sap code, include MV13AF0K
CLEAR: lv_old_zp00, lv_knumh.
CLEAR: lv_new_zp00, lv_sum_z0xx.
SELECT MAX( knumh ) INTO lv_knumh
    FROM konh
    WHERE kappl = 'V'
      AND kschl = xkonh-kschl
      AND vakey = xkonh-vakey
lv_gap = lv_new_zp00 - lv_old_zp00.
If the gap do not correspond to the sum of condition z0xx
-> warning popup

Issue in system condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for