Issue in TO Confirmation

Gurus
I have an issue with Transfer order confirmation
Error :Storage Unit already exists , Check your number range
Can anyone pls help me out on how to resolve this issue
It is very urgent
BR
Avinash

Hi Avinash,
First of all check wheter TO is open or it has been already confirmed(Automatic).
So first check the status of TO you want to do confirm in below Tcodes:
LT22 u2013 By storage type,
LT24 u2013 By matériel,
LT26 u2013 By storage bin ,
LT27 u2013 By storage unit).
And let me know the exact status.
Regards,
Rock

Similar Messages

  • Line item issue in order confirmation

    Hi folks..!!!
      i have an issue regarding order confirmation. while i am trying to display a sale order that line item quantity and somo more data's are printing in second line. i need those data's has to be print in same line in line i.e  item , material and material description displaying row...
    while in layout they done for item, material , material desc are in one TEXT element i.e ITEM_LINE and Quantity and some more fields  are in other TEXT element i.e ITEM_LINE_PRICE_QUANTITY, i think becoz of this quantity is display in second line.. could you plz solve this issue..
    ITEM     MATERIAL     QTY      DESCRIPTION   PRICE....
    10           ABC                           DEMO       
                                    10PC                                 2113
    i need output like this...
    ITEM     MATERIAL     QTY      DESCRIPTION   PRICE....
    10           ABC             10PC          DEMO         2133

    hi ,
    u r using script or form ?
    if u r using script ...
    in tag column put "=" ... so it will cont with the prev line...
    in case u r using smartforms ... keep all the values in single text element ...
    is there any problem in putting them in single column ?

  • Issue related to confirmation of Stock in Sales Order.

    Hi Gurus,
    I have an issue related to confirmation of Stock in Rescheduling.
    I have created a Sales Order for 10 Cases. I am using a Rescheduling Program for the confirmation of Stock
    in Sales Order. I have a stock of 100 Cases but still when i am putting that Order in Rescheduling Program for
    confirmation it is showing me Deficit of Stock.
    Also I have checked the Stock in MMBE it is showing Stock of 100 in Unrestricted Use.
    Also I have checked in MMBE the On Order Stock is 150.
    Please could you give me relation of On Order Stock in this.
    What role it plays in Availability Check.
    Is it because of On Order Stock I am not able to confirm the Sales Order Quantity.
    Awaiting for the resolution.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sam.

    Hi Jameer,
    Thanks for your reply,
    I have replicated the same scenario in Quality it is working fine.
    I forget to add up one more thing in my last issue. There is Product Allocation in Material Master.
    When I go to Sales Order change screen and go to Schedule Line Level to Product Allocation screen
    it is showing the Stock. While same scenario in Production user is not able to confirm the Stock Quantity
    in Sales Order. I want to check the Alloted Stock against that Particular Customer in Product Allocation.
    I need the table and T Code so that I could do the detail analysis with respect to Product Allocation Stock.
    Please if you could help me out.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sam Rock.

  • Post Goods Issue before TO Confirmation

    Hello,
    Is there any possibilities for Post Goods Issue of a delivery document before confirming the TO.
    Scenario 1. Delivery 2. Create TO 3. Post Goods Issue 4. Confirmation.
    Regards

    if the item category in your delivery has a picking relevance, then it is not possible to post a goods issue before picking, since picking quantity is updated when the TO is confirmed.
    Why do you want to post it in that illogical sequence?

  • Tolerence limit for Goods issue while CO11N Confirmation

    Hi,
    We are creating the production order which continues for 1 to 5 days, and partial confirmation is done for the order e,g production order 100, partial confirmation 5,10,20 etc.
    Now while order confirmation, we do the goods movement by which raw material issue against order, but some material issue in different units, like cement issue in BAG, KG etc, due to this at final partial confirmation some times system is issuing the message goods movement failed and in transaction 'COGI' it is showing the error as 'RE Reserved quant. exceeded by 0.010 TO : 40007510 XXXX XXXX XXXX004002'  is there any option for this to allow some excess quanity by providng the tolerence limit, or is there any badi or user exit for this to rounding  the values at the time of final issue.
    Regards,
    Zafar 

    Hi Zafar,
    You can define underdelivery/overdelivery tolerance in Work scheduling view for the material master.
    Added to that, you can define if the tolerance is checked in order confirmation parameter (OPK4 ).
    Thanks and regards,
    Suraj Kamble

  • Goods Issue- Process Order Confirmation

    Hi,
    During Process order confirmation, in Goods Movement tab the BOM components with qty are displayed. But some components OTHER than BOM items ISSUED for the process order is not displayed in the goods movement tab. Why?
    Is there any additional configuation to be done?
    Thanks....
    JK
    Edited by: J K on Apr 15, 2008 6:04 AM

    Hi
    As said by Mr sateesh,
    If u r doing confirmation phase/operation wise(COR6), then the material assign to phase/operation is only seen according to phase/operation wise.so have to check in which phase u have confirm the component quanity.
                    or
    If u confirm the process order collectively(CORK), then their must missing in OPK4 (confirmation Parameter) of All component tick at Goods Movement.
    Kindly check the same & coem back if their is any other issue
    Parminder

  • Issue: CO15 Order confirmation

    Hi,
    In case of u2018Production Orderu2019 confirmation I am facing following issue:
    For the u2018Production Orderu2019 confirmation we use transaction CO15. While confirming the u2018Production orderu2019 system is giving error u2018Posting period 009 2011 is not openu2019, while pressing u2018BACKu2019 F3 it gives error u2018Error in determining actual costs for orderu2019 and terminate the process.
    The FI and MM consultant had checked the period and the period is open. Also the standard cost estimation ect are fine.
    While I try to confirm same order with CO11N system allow to confirm the order.
    suggest what can be the reason?
    Regards,

    Hi ,
           Please try in this fashion-
    1 Check MMPV/MMRV, the desired periods are maintained?
    if yes-go ahead
    2.OB52 make sure period variants are correctly assigned to the posting periods you are looking for.
    if yes-go ahead
    3.If both of the settings are maintained/configured,then suggest you to have a glance of 'Shop Floor customisation'> confirnation parameters.
    Hope it would be heplful at some extent.
    Cheers
    Chandra

  • Automatic Material Issue on Activity Confirmation

    Dear All,
    I am trying to setup the system so that on internal activity confirmation material assigned to the activity is automatically Issued to the WBS.
    Issue:
    BS, but when i confirm the activity system does not issue the material automatically when stock is available as unrestricted stock in the correspondign WBS.
    When there is stock available in the Storage location mentioned in CJ20N for the material automatic GI happens on activity confirmation.
    Can you please let me know why is system not issuing the material available as unrestricted stock on the corresponding WBS??
    Warm Regards,
    Jatinder

    Dear Gokul, Srikant,
    Fine i can use CN25 for confirmation.
    Requirement is that i want to track stock on WBS level, and then issue it to Network/Activity from WBS stock? is this not possible via activity confirmation??
    Is it that if i want to automatically post GI on activity confirmation, it is not possible from Project/WBS stock?
    Warm Regards,
    Jatinder

  • ERP-WM automatic Outbound Delivery Goods Issue upon TO Confirmation

    Hello all,
    We have the following scenario :
    Stock Transfer Order -> Outbound Delivery -> Transfer Order -> Picking -> TO confirmation
    When the TO is confirmed, we customized the system to post the Goods-Issue automatically.
    Now, we would like to stop the Auto-GI on specific situations. To do that we would like to use BADI, UE or Enhancement-Point.
    Since the Auto-GI is done in the background, we cannot make sure which enhancement to use - Breakpoints do not help (again, because it is done in the background).
    My question - does anybody know which program is run in the background for the auto-GI ? OR, does anybody know which UE etc. can be used and may stop th auto-GI ?
    Thanks,
    Isaac

    To my knowledge, there is no user exit or BADI for this purpose.
    A proper solution depends on the way each transaction is executed and the criteria for allowing auto GI.
    If the user is confirming the transfer order in transaction LT12 and provided he knows the GI should not happen then the indicator 3 can be selected for 'Adopt Pick. quantity'. This will override the movement type config and not post the GI for delivery.
    On other hand if you are confirming TO via RF transactions or batch jobs then you insert the coding logic to set this indicator where required.
    Hope this helps.

  • Issue by the confirmation of a who

    Hello Colleagues,
    we got a problem with our SCM-EWM System. We set up an ERP-SCM-EWM Landscape and configured according to the rapid deployment solution guide. All looks fine, but all the time when we try to confirm the warehouse order of the inbound delivery from ERP the system issues an express document with the message "Update was terminated". (attached files)
    Has anyone ever had this problem?
    Thanks and best regards.

    hi
    Can you check is it useful and resolve ur issue.
    Number
    0001022053
    Installation
    0120061532
    Package
    4620  
    Note
    0001233912  -  Dump in UI for WT confirmation when using large no of WOs  
    Software Component
    SCMEWM  
    Status
    Released 
    Date
    30.07.2008
    LIMU 
    METH 
    /SCWM/CL_UI_TO_CONF FILL_TO_SEL_FILTER 
    R3TR 
    CLAS 
    /SCWM/CL_UI_TO_CONF
    SCMEWM
    510
    510
    1022053
    *$*$----------------------------------------------------------------$*$*
      *$ Correction Inst. 0120061532 0001022053 $*
      *$ Req. Corr. Instructions 0120061532 0000925770 Note 0001093935 $*
      *$--------------------------------------------------------------------$*
      *$ Valid for : $*
      *$ Software Component SCMEWM Extended Warehouse Management $*
      *$ Release 510 To SAPK-51007INSCMEWM $*
      *$*$----------------------------------------------------------------$*$*
      *& Object FUNC /SCWM/WHO_GET
      *& Object Header FUGR /SCWM/WHO_MAIN
      *& FUNCTION /SCWM/WHO_GET
      FUNCTION /scwm/who_get.
      DATA: lt_whoid TYPE /scwm/tt_whoid,
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      lt_ordim_o TYPE /scwm/tt_ordim_o,
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      lt_whoids TYPE /scwm/tt_whoid,
      lt_ordim_o TYPE /scwm/tt_ordim_o,
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
      SORT gt_whohu BY lgnum who hukng.
      RETURN.
      ENDIF.
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      ELSEIF NOT it_whorange IS INITIAL.
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      ELSEIF NOT it_whoid IS INITIAL.
      * coding identical to iv_whoid - just in LOOP
      LOOP AT it_whoid INTO ls_whoid.
      READ TABLE gt_who ASSIGNING <who> WITH KEY lgnum = iv_lgnum
      who = ls_whoid-who
      BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
      IF <who>-db_lock IS INITIAL AND NOT iv_lock_who IS INITIAL.
      DELETE gt_who WHERE lgnum = iv_lgnum AND
      who = ls_whoid-who.
      DELETE gt_whohu WHERE lgnum = iv_lgnum AND
      who = ls_whoid-who.
      APPEND ls_whoid TO lt_whoids.
      ELSE.
      APPEND <who> TO et_who.
      IF et_whohu IS REQUESTED.
      READ TABLE gt_whohu TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
      WITH KEY lgnum = iv_lgnum
      who = ls_whoid-who
      BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
      LOOP AT gt_whohu ASSIGNING <whohu> FROM sy-tabix.
      IF <whohu>-lgnum <> iv_lgnum OR <whohu>-who <> iv_whoid.
      EXIT.
      ENDIF.
      APPEND <whohu> TO et_whohu.
      ENDLOOP.
      ENDIF.
      IF <who>-type CA 'CD' AND "pick pack path
      <who>-topwhoid IS NOT INITIAL.
      READ TABLE gt_whohu TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
      WITH KEY lgnum = iv_lgnum
      who = <who>-topwhoid
      BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
      LOOP AT gt_whohu ASSIGNING <whohu> FROM sy-tabix.
      IF <whohu>-lgnum <> iv_lgnum OR
      <whohu>-who <> <who>-topwhoid.
      EXIT.
      ENDIF.
      APPEND <whohu> TO et_whohu.
      ENDLOOP.
      ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      ELSE.
      APPEND ls_whoid TO lt_whoids.
      ENDIF.
      CHECK NOT iv_to IS INITIAL.
      APPEND ls_whoid TO lt_whoid.
      ENDLOOP.
      IF NOT lt_whoids IS INITIAL.
      TRY.
      IF et_whohu IS REQUESTED.
      CALL FUNCTION '/SCWM/WHO_SELECT'
      EXPORTING
      iv_to = iv_to
      iv_lgnum = iv_lgnum
      it_who = lt_whoids
      iv_lock_who = iv_lock_who
      iv_lock_to = iv_lock_to
      io_prot = io_prot
      IMPORTING
      et_who = et_who
      et_whohu = et_whohu
      et_ordim_o = et_ordim_o
      et_ordim_c = et_ordim_c.
      ELSE.
      CALL FUNCTION '/SCWM/WHO_SELECT'
      EXPORTING
      iv_to = iv_to
      iv_lgnum = iv_lgnum
      it_who = lt_whoids
      iv_lock_who = iv_lock_who
      iv_lock_to = iv_lock_to
      io_prot = io_prot
      IMPORTING
      et_who = et_who
      et_ordim_o = et_ordim_o
      et_ordim_c = et_ordim_c.
      ENDIF.
      ENDTRY.
      APPEND LINES OF et_who TO gt_who.
      APPEND LINES OF et_who TO gt_who.
      SORT gt_who BY lgnum who.
      APPEND LINES OF et_whohu TO gt_whohu.
      SORT gt_whohu BY lgnum who hukng.
      ENDIF.
      CHECK NOT iv_to IS INITIAL.
      ELSEIF NOT it_whorange IS INITIAL.
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
      >>> A T T E N T I O N: P L E A S E N O T E: <<<
      >>> Correction contains additional changes that are NOT shown here <<<
      >>> Display all changes by Note Assistant Note display functionality <<<
      *& Object METH /SCWM/CL_UI_TO_CONF
      *& CALL_WHO_GET
      *& Object Header CLAS /SCWM/CL_UI_TO_CONF
      DATA: ls_msg TYPE symsg,
      lv_who TYPE /scwm/de_who,
      ls_who TYPE /scwm/s_whoid,
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      lt_who_range TYPE rsds_frange_t,
      ls_who_range TYPE rsds_frange,
      lt_selopt TYPE rsds_selopt_t,
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      lt_selopt TYPE rsds_selopt_t,
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
      IF iv_who IS SUPPLIED.
      lv_who = iv_who.
      ENDIF.
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      IF it_who IS SUPPLIED.
      LOOP AT it_who INTO ls_who.
      ls_selopt-sign = wmegc_sign_inclusive.
      ls_selopt-option = wmegc_option_eq.
      ls_selopt-low = ls_who-who.
      APPEND ls_selopt TO lt_selopt.
      ENDLOOP.
      IF NOT lt_selopt[] IS INITIAL.
      ls_who_range-fieldname = wmegc_fname_who.
      APPEND LINES OF lt_selopt TO ls_who_range-selopt_t.
      APPEND ls_who_range TO lt_who_range.
      ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      TRY.
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      TRY.
      IF et_whohu IS REQUESTED.
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
      CALL FUNCTION '/SCWM/WHO_GET'
      EXPORTING
      iv_lgnum = iv_lgnum
      iv_whoid = lv_who
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      it_whorange = lt_who_range
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      it_whoid = it_who
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
      iv_lock_who = iv_lock_who
      IMPORTING
      es_who = es_who
      et_who = et_who
      et_whohu = et_whohu.
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      CATCH /scwm/cx_core.
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      ELSE.
      CALL FUNCTION '/SCWM/WHO_GET'
      EXPORTING
      iv_lgnum = iv_lgnum
      iv_whoid = lv_who
      it_whoid = it_who
      iv_lock_who = iv_lock_who
      IMPORTING
      es_who = es_who
      et_who = et_who.
      ENDIF.
      CATCH /scwm/cx_core.
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
      *& Object METH /SCWM/CL_UI_TO_CONF
      *& FILL_TO_SEL_FILTER
      *& Object Header CLAS /SCWM/CL_UI_TO_CONF
      LOOP AT it_selection INTO ls_selection
      WHERE fieldname EQ 'F_TANUM'
      OR fieldname EQ 'F_TOSTAT_O'.
      IF ls_selection-fieldname EQ 'F_TANUM'
      *>>>> START OF DELETION <<<<<
      AND ls_selection-sign EQ wmegc_sign_inclusive.
      *>>>> END OF DELETION <<<<<<<
      *>>>> START OF INSERTION <<<<
      AND ls_selection-sign EQ wmegc_sign_inclusive
      AND ls_selection-low CO '0123456789'
      AND ls_selection-high CO '0123456789'.
      *>>>> END OF INSERTION <<<<<<
    Regards
    Suraj

  • Output Issue for order confirmation

    We have a sales order contains 3 line items 10,20 & 30.
    We have found the line item 30 has been created in the sales order change log,. after the line items 10 and 20 has created. 
    The print output copy is having 4 pages.
    In that print preview the header data was appearing for item 10 on page 1 and the same header data was re-appearing for item 30 on page 3.
    For better understanding we have taken the generated spool files of the sales order and compared with the print output copies which was sent by the user.
    Also we found that all the header details ( sold-t0 & ship-to addresses ) are generating in the SAP spool file for all the 3 line items 10,20 & 30. Here the output is z output type.
    But the header details are printing in the PDF ( print output ) for line item 10 and 30 only. ( Not printing for item 20 ). 
    As per the SAP print program, whatever layout is generated in SAP, same thing should print in PDF
    So as we assume that there is some mismatch in the layout mapping. ( here the layout is JETFORM Server )
    But we are not sure about the problem ?
    Please help me on this ...

    Hi,
    This can be due to various problems,
    First check if there is any bug in the program itself. have a walkthrough. Once this is ensured, process one document in debugging mode for similar scenario and then check the spool.
    You can convert the spool into PDF using your own program and then use the same spool for PDF conversion using some SAP programs like RSTXPDF4 etc. If there is an issue with your program, you can find out using these cases.
    Also, there can also be problems which are printer specific. I would suggest you to test in different printers. Then only you can decide if ABAPer needs to fix it or you need a BASIS guy.

  • Issue while making confirmations in SRM.

    Hi Gurus,
    Can any one suggest me a solution for this problem.
    This is SRM version 4.0 . The user has raised a Shopping cart in SRM with 4 line items and it  got appoved and created a PO sucessfully in the SAP R/3 system.
    Now the user has changed the PO quantities in the SAP R/3 system and now trying to do the confirmations  against that PO for the quantities he has received, i.e he has now tried to do confirmations for the 2nd Line item and it gave an error saying that Error in process. which is diplayed in the shopping cart history.
    Now when he is trying to do the confirmations for anyone of the Line item in that PO. System gives a POP -UP message saying that
    " ** Document is in transfer for Puchase order, creation not possible **".
    Can any one suggest how to get rid of this error message and perform  the confirmations in SRM against this PO , if this is not possible then we need to do it from SAP R/3.
    Regards
    Srujan.K

    Hi Muthu,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Just wanted to clarify you on background of it.  we are using the classic  SRM 4.0 version and the PO in the SAP R/3 is the leading PO so I cannot  change the PO in the SRM.
    However the PO hwich has been changed in the SAP R/3 system I can see the updated quantities and while user trying to do the confirmations I can see the updated quantities in SRM at line item level.
    But I am not able to find the Idoc number for this confirmation and I have gone to the BU2023 object in BBP_PD and could check there the object key is not updated but core key is updated  and I can see the error in transmission.
    This error is when the user is trying to make confirmation first for the line item 2 in the PO. But now the system is not allowing to do the confirmations to any of the line items and now displays the error as
    "  Document is in transfer for PO , creation not possible"
    I even have checked in SM58 in the SAP R/3 system no entries I could find.
    Regards
    Srujank

  • Issue with qty confirmation in sales order

    Dear All,
    Earlier when i used to create the sales order and even if i confirm 1 qty also, i was able to deliver  the entire qty mentioned in the sales order. But now. I am unable to do it.
    System is asking me to confirm the entire qty mentioned in the sales order. Unless i do it system is not allowing me to do the delivery.
    Pls help

    Hai,
    In the particular customer master,
    Check
    Sales area data
    Partial delivery per item     (Entry blank) Partial delivery allowed
    Then try new sales order.
    Regards,
    Mani

  • Issue on ship confirm API

    Hi All,
    I am working on the ship confirm API. I created package and calling WSH_DELIVERY_DETAILS_PUB.Update_Shipping_Attributes API if it returns the status as success('S'), then we are calling wsh_deliveries_pub.delivery_action API. But my problem is getting return status as 'E' and Msg_data as 'Error'.
    Can anyone help how to trace errors in calling API.
    Thanks in advance.....
    Venkanna.

    Hi Venkanna
    Hi
    wsh_delivery_details_pub.update_shipping_attributes
    (p_api_version_number => 1.0,
    p_init_msg_list => lcl_init_msg_list,
    p_commit => fnd_api.g_true,
    x_return_status => x_return_status,
    x_msg_count => x_msg_count,
    x_msg_data => x_msg_data, p_changed_attributes => changed_attributes,
    p_source_code => 'OE',
    p_serial_range_tab => serial_range_tab
    we can get it from x_msg_data.
    Thankyou
    [email protected]

  • Goods issue after PO confirmation

    Hi, expert
    After the production order being confirmed, can production line still staging materail from warehouse to PSA with referende to the same order?

    Wang,
    Do you mean to say that can the GR be done on the order which is already confirmed with CO11N? or the confirmation more than the order quantity.
    GR & confirmation are two separate processes.
    But GR as well as confirmation can be done more than the order quantity.
    You can have extra GR against the order with T code MB31.
    For confirmation more than the order quantity, you need to do settings in confirmation parameters in OPK4. If you set over & underdelivery toleranceis not checked in 'Generally valid setting' tab page.
    If you do this then it will enable you to do confirmation more than the order quantity.
    Hope this helps you.
    SmanS

Maybe you are looking for