Issue In Universe Creation

Hi,
I have One query in BI which contains two structures one at row level and one in column.
column stuture has various selections which are defined using characteristics whereas raw sturcture level selections are dfined using characteristics as well as key figs.
I tried to create universe on this Query.
Universe got suceesfully created but it shows only one structure which is at raw level
the other struture is blank..
may i know why this is happening..
is der any limitation on no of structures in universe..

Go to OMS4 for the status -01 & change inventory mgmt from B to A or blank. It would resolve your issue.
If helpful award points
Regards,
Vivek
Added
Also change the message type to A or blank for fields under material requirements.
Or
Select a status which has A for Mtl req's & Inventory mgmt, that would also resolve your issue
Edited by: Vivek on Feb 20, 2009 5:40 PM

Similar Messages

Designer hangs during universe creation against SAP BW

Hi,
We are trying to create OLAP universe against SAP BW 3.5 and we are running into issue wherein the designer just hangs and is not able to create the classes and objects, in most cases we have waited for about 30-35 mins and still it doesn't come back. We tried this for both against an Infocube as well as against BW query.
I have couple of questions regarding the process flow for universe creation against SAP BW,
Does universe stores/extracts any data from BW, like storing LOVs for the hierarchies? I know it does reads the rows, columns, free characterstics etc. in case of BW Query.
The time to create the universe depends on what factors, size of the cube or amount of metadata? The customer is concerned regarding what is the guideline on how much time would this process take when the universe comes back with the classes and objects. If there is any such guideline, what is it?
Any response on this is appreciated.
Thanks,
Amit Banavalikar

I had similar problems, setting the "Connection timeout" on the SAP/BW connection within Designer (default 10 minutes) from 10 min. to 60 or 120. ALSO: uncheck the universe limits on "number of rows (5000)" and "query duration (10 min)".
This solved the problem.
The connection timeout which is set directly on the SAP-BW connection in designer seems to be used in a wrong way. The definition of the "close connection after xx minutes" means that the connction should be closed after xx minutes of not being used by any process.
With SAP BW the connection seems to be closed regardless of it's use after the specified time period.
regards,
Walter

Issue during automatic Creation of Work Order from Notification

Hi,
I have a issue during automatic Creation of Work Order from Notification.
BADI implemented: NOTIF_EVENT_POST
BAPI called in BADI: BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
I am able to create Work Order successfully but after that i need to update notification header with created work order number.
But i am unable to update the same (VIQMEL-AUFNR).
Can anybody provide solution for the same!
Thanks,
Kumar.

Hi,
Any inputs on above posted issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Kumar.

Automating Goods issue during Delivery creation

Hi all,
We have a requirement to automate the Goods issue creation for certain type of orders when the Delivery is getting created. The orders that need to be automatically Goods issued during delivery creation are identified based on certain plants. These plants are linked to certain output type and in the output type routine is the standard program RVADEK01 with one additonal code for automating the Goods Issue creation.
We have a custom table that holds the status of orders and there is a code in user exit userexit_save_document_prepare which changes the status of the order as closed when the goods issue is done.
But when the delivery is saved, in this case when an automatic goods issue needs to happen, when the flow reaches this user exit, the output type code dosenot get executed and the Goods issue is not done and so the custom table will not be updated with the closed status. So we are in need to findout a place where we can update the status of the order in that table.
The output type code is not executed even before the other user exit userexit_save_document. The output type code gets executed and goods issue is done after the this userexit_save_document when the COMMIT statement is executed in the subroutine BELEG_SICHEN_POST in the include FV50XF0B_BELEG_SICHERN.
I need help in finding out if any user exit or badi is called after this commit statement, so that I can add my code to close the status of the order in my custom table. Just after this commit the Goods issue happens and the VBFA table gets updated with the 'R' records for goods issue.
Please let me know if anyone has any idea on this. The ultimate goal is to find some place after the goods issue is done to update the status of the order as closed in the custom table we have.
Thanks,
Packia

Dear Siva,
As informed yesterday I changed the language from DE to EN, to match the other shipping points settings in table V_TVST, this did not bring the solution.
Please let me summarize, I am really desparate here:
This is only IM related, Not WM.
Picking lists are not printed for any Shipping Point from this warehouse, this is just a small subsidiary of my customer in Finland.
Issue is not Aut. PGI.
VP01SHP has not been configured for any shipping points, still there we do get the PR except for the new shipping point.
In the deliveries of correct processed shipping points I do not find any picking output type.
Item category in new shipping is equal to Item category in already existing shipping points, so no need to config here.
There is no picking block active.
PR creation happens once I enter the pick qty in the delivery in VL02N. This is the part that we need to have automated.
Can you please try to help me out?
Tnx & regards,
Chris

Issue in PO creation for Direct Material Procurement.

Hi Experts,
I am working with SRM 7.0 Classic Scenario.
I have no issues with SC creation for indirect materials with Account Assignment.
But when I select Order as Direct material in SC for any material with out account assignment on Approval of SC PO is created in SRM system as Extendended Classic Scenario even though I have not activated Extended classic scenario.
Kindly help me out in this issue how can I order as DIRECT MATERIAL WITH Classic scenario.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

karthi
it is standard behavior,
but you can do one thing .
BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW BADI - TRY . CLEAR THE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT .Thats all . check it up with technical resoucre.
but you have to decide by developemnt what are the materials are PO with account / without account assignment
br
muthu

OLAP cube not visible in the list during universe creation

Hi
I am trying to create universe on a BI query which is build on a multiprovider. During universe creation step 4 i need to choose the OLAP cubes, but unfortunately i didn't see the multiproivder in the list. If i see that multiprovider i can expand the tree and can find my query in it. But i don't know why the multiprovider is not in the OLAP cubes?
by the way mutliprovider is Z multiprovider which i created, not a standard one.
Do i need to change any settings for the multiprovider just like what we do for query (Allow external access)
Thanks

Yeah I did that, but during the universe creation first we need to choose the multiprovider and when we expand the multiprovider we can see all the queries in it. Here in my case i am not able to see the multiprovider in order to select query in the next step.
I have checked the external access in the query advanced options also.
Thanks

SAP MM issue Relevant to Creation of PO from PR via ME57

Hi
For a PR with Qty 1, Generally On PO can be created. (Take assigned PR)
But while processing through ME57 ,it is creating two PO's.
How ?
with one screen ME57 started and kept some where partially in the process of creating PO.
In another screen ,again through same me57 or ME59n ,processing the same PR and PO is created.
Now from the first screen , SAP is allowing to create another PO
Totally two PO's
How to rectify this error.
After creating PO's if we try for another PO means ,it is giving error that qty exceeded.
For your information,in our system ,we kept the message as warning which wont allow to create another PO.
What is the solution for this Issue.
Is there any OSS notes for this?
Below is the discussion for the same.
You mean , you are on the partial way of trying to create PO through ME57 and your colleagues is started processing same PR through ME59N.
After PO created by him, it is allowing you to create another PO also without error message.
REgards
KG Subramanian
<< Personal information removed >>
JK: Yes, that is exactly what we did. I run open purreqs with ME57, started to make PO of one of them (=> takes me in to ME21N) but I didn't save PO yet. Meanwhile my collague runs ME59N and after it has saved PO for this purreq I was able to save PO for same purreq without any warnings.
Where as if you try after this process you could not able to process another PO against the same PR.?
JK: Yes. If I try to find this purreq with ME57 (or ME59n) it doesn't find it which is logical as PO(s) are already there.
Also confirm me from your experience that whether is it allowed double POu2019s when these transactions done separately ? (not simultaneously processing the PRu2019s)
JK: From my experience I would say it is possible to create PO for same purreq if same purreq has been included in the original result and this "Update worklist" is not pressed:
This I'm not 100% sure and have not tested it but I'd assume so. If this update is pressed, it removes purreqs which have been turned to POseven if it is done by some other user.
Simply I can say the issue is because simultaneous processing of PRu2019s which allows creation of Double POu2019s.
Hope my understanding about the issue is correct.
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 12, 2009 12:32 PM

Hi
I have set the Messages as you mentioned in SPRO and checked to create PR to PO.Still it is allowing to create.
Creating this messages will activate in Po relevant program ?
Because i am getting another Message 06-249 while processing PO for already processed PR. This message is coming from Program .But the same is not there the place wherre you asked to maintian me 06-254 and 06-248 (in SPRO).
Can you some more information about this.

Issue with index creation of an infocube.

Hi,
I have an issue with creation of index's for a info cube in SAP BI. when i create index's using
a process chain for the cube it is getting failed in the process chain. when i try to check the index's for this
cube manual the following below massage is shown.
*The recalculation can take some time (depending on data volume)*
*The traffic light status is not up to date during this time*
Even i tried to repair the index's using the standard program "SAP_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPAIR" in SE38
to repair the index so it is leading to dump in this case.
Dear experts with the above issue please suggest.
Regards,
Prasad.

Hi,
Please check the Performance tab in the Cube manage and try doing a repair index from there.
This generates a job so check the job in SM37 and see if it finishes. If it fails, check the job log which will give you the exact error.
These indices are F fact table indices so if nothing works, try activating the cube by the pgm 'RSDG_CUBE_ACTIVATE' and see if that resolves the issue.
Let us know the results.

Issues in auto creation of tasks using templates/attributes in FS

Hi,
We have a requirement to auto-create one or more tasks when a SR is created in Field Service module. Additionally, task owner should be auto-populated during the task creation (task owner would a CRM group which is dependent on the task type as per company defined business rules). There can be one or more task types associated with a SR type. Tasks within a SR type can or cannot be dependent on one or more tasks within the same SR type e.g. I can have 3 task types A, B and C under a SR type and C is dependent on B, so we set up the dependency as needed.
We were thinking of following the task template group approach. We created the task templates per SR type and associated the template with the SR type. Issue here is - we cannot assign the task owner value to the task type (I couldn't see a placeholder to define the task owner). Does anyone have pointers on defining the task owner while creating task group templates?
Another issue is - whenever there is a dependency between tasks, we cannot define the parent task id value. When you navigate to the tasks screen and select the dependent task, you get the error "field must be entered" for parent task id. Any thoughts on defining dependencies with parent task id populated when the tasks are created?
Second approach we tried is creating SR/Task attribute mapping configuration. Here we can define the task owner as well but the issue is we cannot define the dependencies between the tasks. Also we are getting the error "Attribute CUG_TASK_DEP_ID doesnot exist for item JTFTASK" and tasks are not getting created.
Any pointers on resolving these issues would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Shreevatsa

Hi,
Today Auto Task creation can be based on the following:
Task Template Mapping => Based on SR Type, Product Category/Product, Problem Code mapping. For this mapping, Territories need to be setup to determine the Task Owner. If Territories are not setup, the application will not auto create Tasks.
Task Type Attribute Configuration => Based on SR Type <=> CIC Attributes mapping. In this mapping definition, the Task Owner field is required to be setup. Whenever Tasks are auto created, the Task Owner setup in the definition is used.
For Task Dependency - what is the requirement? For a SR Type if three Tasks A, B, and C need to be auto created - are you looking for functionality to first create only Task A and when Task A is closed to create only Task B and when Task B is closed to create Task C?
Thanks,
Denzil

Issue in BP creation in CRM 7 connected using XIF from CRM 4

Hi All,
We have connected CRM 7 and CRM 4 using XIF
We are facing an issue where 2 IDOCs (with same Basic type CRMXIF_PARTNER_SAVE_M01) are generated at same time while using XIF adapter dring busines partner creation. First IDOC is succesful and other fails with error message " Business patner locked by you".
Can you please share some expertise on this.
Thanks & regards,
Mohit SIngh

Hi Bala,
Which version of CRM are you using? There are some notes for CUST_HIERARCHY BDoc errors. Please have a look at them in the Support Portal.
CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL is used for validation of rules set in CRM Server and maybe you dont have the same mandatory rules in MSA.
Best Regards,
Ankan

Issue in domain creation local deployment Error : odi-core.jar

Hi,
I am trying to create a domain on my VM for local deployment of fincomm and Ess. But during domain creation it is failing with following errors.
Error in writing to file '/scratch/software/mw_local/FMWTOOLS_11.1.1.7.0_GENERIC_130327.1838_PATCHES4FA_11.1.1.7.0_PLATFORMS/vimjain/mw_home_standalone/odi/oracledi.sdk/lib/odi-core.jar'. [invalid block type]
Cancelling Install Session..
Internal Error: File Copy failed. Aborting Install
I tried the various different options for creation but all failed.
1> I tried by resetting to old patchset.
2> 3 days back i was able to successfully create the domain, but today i am seeing the error as discussed.
3>Tried to delete the patchset and recreate a new one, but still no luck
If anyone else is also seeing the same issue and able to resolve.
Thanks
Vimal

You may want to use Oracle Internal forums and blogs for solution.
Since these are public forums, you should not post content contains sensitive information here. Please remove the dir structure (which also includes your uid).

Exchange rate issue during PO creation

Dear Friends
I am getting the below error whenever I am trying to create an Import PO
Enter rate USD / INR rate type for 28.10.2010 in the system settings
Message no. SG105
I have entered the rates in OB08 table- for direct & Indiret exchange rates for M
I also have cheched the OBBS and made entries for the date 28.10.2010
But still I am getting the error
How do I proceed
Samuel
Edited by: samuel mendis on Oct 28, 2010 1:07 PM

Guys
We have solved this issue. Even though we were getting the SG105 error, the real problem was some where else.
We have never used CIN in our our organisation as it is not applicable. The problem we did is to use the Import pricing procedure for our use which was copied from IN: Purchasing for Imported materials.
Whenever we tried to create a Import PO it was validating the CVD entries which we make in the company code settings for Tax on Goods Movements. Once I maintained a dummy G/L account the error was gone.
The problem is why it validated CVD during PO creation we never understood. Since in my opinion CVD capturing is done during Invoicing verification stage and not during PO stage. Either way we have already updated these details to the SAP Support bench.
Thanks
Samuel

No Pre-commitment at PR creation time in ECC -issue at PO creation in SRM

Hi all,
We are on SRM 5.0 Extendec CLassic with ECC 6.0
I have a couple of questions wrt budget check and commitment creation in SRM.
1.When a PRis transferred from ECC to SRM,is the budget check possible?If yes,what are the settings in ECC/SRM?
2. After a PR is transferred to SRM,SC gets created.When creating a SC,is the budget check done?If so,if the funds are available,is acommitment posted to ECC?
3.IF the Budget check error was not encountered at the time of SC creation,while creating a PO,why does the system gives error that "Funds not available".Is this correct?
We have somePR's(inventory) which get transferred to SRM,but after the SC is created and aPO is issued for that SC,systemchecks the budget and throws an error that funds not available.
What we want is that at the time ofPR creation itself,system should check the funds and disallow PRcreation if funda are not available.
Can anyone tell me whether we need to implement the controlin ECC at the of PR creation or is this issue because of no commitment happening at SC level?
Please clarify.

Hi Muthu/Virendra and other xperts,
Any suggestions?

OLAP Universe creation process questions and proposals

We have created an OLAP universe based on a BW-Query. The automatical creation of the OLAP universe does not produce a satisfying result.
We are working with the latest available releases (BOE XI 3.1 SP2 and SAP Integration KIT SP2, SAP BI 7 EHP1).
We have detected that all dimension objects store the name instead of the key field.
Example:
Customer Dimension Object (L01 Customer) = Customer Name
Customer Key Detail Object (L01 Customer Key) = Customer Number
Customer Name Detail Object (L01 Customer Name) = Customer Name
This is not usable for end user because of the following reasons:
1. The detail objects can not be used for merge dimensions, so it is not possible to merge on the supplier number.
2. If you filter on the dimension object you will only see the text in the list of values (LOV) and it is not possible to edit the list of values in the universe to add the supplier number to the LOV as it is possible in relational universes
3. If the user select the detail object always the dimension object in inserted into the report query
4. The "Business Explorer" general setting "Display" of an InfoObject has no effect on the OLAP universe dimension object. If you change it to key always the text is shown. Even if you change the "ValueDisplay as" in the underlying BW Query to "key" is has no effect.
5. The renaming of the L01 object to blank is not possible. You need to rename to " " and then remove on each object the blank.
So we need to modify manually every universe to change the "detail key object" to a "dimension object" and the "detail name object" to reference the new "dimension object" with the key. This manual process has a huge work effort in time. Is there a better solution or enhancements planned in the next releases?
Additionally there should be an option to disable the automatic creation of each characteristic as a subclass in the universe. A wizard should ask if a subclass should be created or not for each characteristic. Currently there are to many subclasses generated which were mostly not needed.

Hi,
First of all I would say u are lucky to start with SP2. Because whatever modifications you do in Universe those are retained.
We had a big trouble in using BOXIR3.1 FP1.7.
Anyways.. Back to your Questions and My asnwers for those:
1. The detail objects can not be used for merge dimensions, so it is not possible to merge on the supplier number.
Ans: True, Dimension object always shows Short text values by default. but if you can create the logic at SAP BI query level to map short text with keys then your problem will be solved.
2. If you filter on the dimension object you will only see the text in the list of values (LOV) and it is not possible to edit the list of values in the universe to add the supplier number to the LOV as it is possible in relational universes.
Ans: True u cannt edit LOV, but alternate solution to it is create the variable in SAP BI Query, that will appear as prompt in universe which will display the List of values with Key as well as Description.
3. If the user select the detail object always the dimension object in inserted into the report query.
Ans: Logically its correct, because Detail object is always associated with Dimension. Buit if you dont want that dimension in query you can remove that dimension by dragging back.
4. The "Business Explorer" general setting "Display" of an InfoObject has no effect on the OLAP universe dimension object. If you change it to key always the text is shown. Even if you change the "ValueDisplay as" in the underlying BW Query to "key" is has no effect.
Ans: In Query designer even if you ValueDisplay as "Key", but at Object level if there is Text and Key associated for perticulat Infoobject, then so by default the dimension will show the Text and there will be seperate Detail object in universe for Key.
5. The renaming of the L01 object to blank is not possible. You need to rename to " " and then remove on each object the blank.
Ans: Yes this is a big trouble.
Regards,
Nisha

How to resolve the issue in token creation in oracle mobile and social?

Hi
I am facing an issue in client token creation.To check where exactly the problem is, I tried logging the same and I found that till the line just before the tokencreation is logged. It breaks at the line where token is to be created.
AuthenticationResult savedClientToken= tc.createToken(tcrd, headers);
Can I have a solution for this?
Thank you
     Devika

It is better to close statement using try...catch...finally , e.g.
PreparedStatement objStmt = null;
try
     objStmt = conn.prepareStatement(...);
     // ... do anything
catch (Exception e)
     // ... exception handling
finally
     // another try...catch block to handle exception during statement close
     try {   objStmt.close();   }     catch (Exception e) {   }
     objStmt = null;
This would guarantee that statment object is being closed even though exception is thrown. (Don't wait for connection release by garbage collector)

Issue In Universe Creation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for