Issue in vl10b transaction in SHP_VL10_DELIVERY_CREATE

Hi friends,
I am facing a problem in vl10b transaction. when i execute this transaction for return good receipt, it gives me an error saying
No data exists for delivery 80000292. I debuged it and found that it is returning this error while executing
SHP_VL10_DELIVERY_CREATE fm. I am trying to find the reason from last 3 days but not able to find the same.
Kindly help me what can be the reson behind this.
This transaction is working fine for normal good receipt.

i used CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_OUTPUT.
and it is solved.

Similar Messages

STO po number not appearing in VL10B transaction

Dear Guru,
I have created STO PO with inter plant transter and shipping tab is also coming as per required in STO
but for further operation in VL10B transaction STO PO number is not appearing
Pl let me know if i have missed anything important.
Regards,
Vimlesh

hi,
Please try this way with check points
1.delivery date in PO and make sure it is in the delivery creation date range of VL10B
2.Stock of material should be available in supplying plant.
3.Enter PO number in Purchase Orders tab (T code VL10B) and execute
4.In next screen,Select line and click on Background button.this will create a delivery.
Hope it would work...
regards,
Vineet

Returns PO appearing in VL10B transaction even after delivery is created with full PO qty

Hi All,
Returns PO is appearing in VL10B transaction even after delivery is created with full PO qty /
Regards
ab

Hi Ayub,
Please go to the Return PO item details, and check the Delivery tab and make sure the delivery completed check box is selected. If not please select the check box and save the line items.
If there are multiple line items, then do the same for all the line items.
Then check in VL10B and confirm me.

Issue with VL10b

Hi,
I am facing the very weird problem. i am using the retail envirnoment ecc 6.0.
i have scheduled daily batch job for outbound delivery creation from STO's through VL10B transaction.
As per the SAP standard system it should create a single delivery for one customer consolidating all STO's related to that customer/site.
but unfortunately system is not behaving like this and creating split deliveries for singel site/customer.
I have also checked the number of line items in the delivery they are much less than 999 so there should not be any reason to create split delivery.
can anybody guide in what aread i can look to resolve this?
thanks in advance
Praful

Hi,
split Deliveries are created due to following criteria:
ship to party
Delivery date
Plant
shipping point
shipping conditions
Transportation grp
Loading grp
Item categories of materials
Please check the data
Regards,
Abhee.

2 issues with call transaction to LS24

Hello All,
There are 2 issues with call transaction to LS24.
<b>1) It doesn't take batch value and displays stock for all batches.
2) When you go back, it doesn't go back to the calling program.</b>
Any thoughts ?
<u>Here is my code:</u>
PARAMETERS: p_lgnum TYPE lgnum,
            p_matnr TYPE matnr,
            p_werks TYPE werks_d,
            p_lgort TYPE lgort_d,
            p_charg TYPE charg_d.
START-OF-SELECTION.
END-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM display_stock_per_batch.
*&      Form DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH
FORM display_stock_per_batch .
SET PARAMETER ID 'LGN' FIELD p_lgnum.
SET PARAMETER ID 'MAT' FIELD p_matnr.
SET PARAMETER ID 'WRK' FIELD p_werks.
SET PARAMETER ID 'LAG' FIELD p_lgort.
SET PARAMETER ID 'CHA' FIELD p_charg.
CALL TRANSACTION 'LS24' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ENDFORM.                    " DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH

hello
use this code
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RL01S-CHARG'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-LGNUM'
                              p_lgnum.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-MATNR'
                              p_matnr.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-WERKS'
                              p_werks.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-LGORT'
                              p_lgort.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-BESTQ'
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-SOBKZ'
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-CHARG'
                              p_charg.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/EBACK'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RL01S-LGNUM'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'LS24'.
may be it will help u

Authorization issue on SHD0 transaction variant in R/3

Hi,
Can anyone help me on the below issue?
Created a transaction variant ZME31K using SHD0 on R/3 system with the base transaction ME31K.
And created a transaction ZME31K for the above transaction variant.
Created one ID which has access only to transaction ZME31K.
But when tried to create contract using ZME31K, it allows to create the contract, but ended up with message "You are not authorized to use ME31K".
Anyone faced similar issue before? how this can be resolved? As per the busniess requirement, they can provide access only to the transaction variant for the user and they will not be assigned to ME31K.
-Thanks,

> We are doing an Upgrade assessment wherein at R/3 side, the system is being upgraded from 4.6 to ECC 6.0.
> I wanted to know the impact the Change in Transactions at R/3 side.. namely transactions..
> AS02, CT02, F-02, F-41, F-49, FB01 would have on BW.
What do you mean? I don't get your question. What impact should those transaction have on BI?
Markus

Issue in MD04 transaction with exception message 26

Dear All,
I am facing 2 issues:
1) Even if the sales order line is confirmed and fulfilled, we are getting the stock for that material against the same sales order in the MMBE Transaction.
2) For the above material present in those sales Order which are confirmed and fulfilled, We are getting the entries for that material in Transaction MD04 ( Stock requirement list of the material after we run the MRP for a particular materia) with the exception message 26.
From our end, we have used the report sdrqcr21 which delete the wrong entries from "VBBE" so that MD04 will show incorrect entries but this approach is not helping us in the above situation.
Regards,
Rakesh

Rakesh,
This is one issue. There is nothing wrong with the software, this is standard behavior. You have built or procured more stock than was required by the sales order. The remaining unnecessary stock is now sitting in inventory, and is displayed in MD04 under the Sales order segment. This stock can never be used again within SAP, unless someone re-opens the sales order or performs some transaction to remove the stock from being 'Sales order on hand' stock.
Some companies will scrap this material, using their standard scrapping policies. Others will transfer this un-usable E stock to general stock, if it can actually be reused.
Rgds,
DB49

Issue in Material Transaction in WIP

Gratings to Guru's...
I trying to do Material issue for Discrete job components in WIP. but facing an error in MTL_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE. below are the error details.
Error Msg : ‘Requirement is this job/schedule's primary assembly’
Error Code : inventory_item_id.
I am using below insert statement.(able to do material transaction through front end also Similar kind of data for other organization is working fine).
insert into mtl_transactions_interface
( source_code,
source_line_id,
source_header_id,
process_flag,
validation_required,
transaction_mode,
lock_flag,
last_update_date,
last_updated_by,
creation_date,
created_by,
inventory_item_id,
organization_id,
transaction_quantity,
primary_quantity,
transaction_uom,
transaction_date,
subinventory_code,
locator_id,
transaction_source_id,
transaction_source_type_id,
transaction_action_id,
transaction_type_id,
transaction_reference,
wip_entity_type,
operation_seq_num,
bom_revision_date,
routing_revision_date,
scheduled_flag,
final_completion_flag,
Flow_schedule,
--revision,
transaction_interface_id
values (
1, --source code
1, -- source line id
-1, -- source header id
1, -- process flag
1, -- validation required
3, -- transaction mode
2, -- lock flag
sysdate, -- last update date
-1, -- last updated by
sysdate, -- creation date
-1, -- created by
62481, -- inventory item id --*
414, -- org id*
-30, -- transaction quantity
-30, -- primary quantity
'EA', -- transaction uom *
sysdate, -- transaction date
'UKDIE', -- subinventory code*
47473, --locator_id *
4368857, -- transaction source id *
5, -- transaction source type id
31, -- transaction action id
35, -- transaction type id
'test', -- transaction reference
1, -- wip entity type
10, -- operation seq num
sysdate, -- bom revision date
sysdate, -- routing revision date
2, -- scheduled flag
'N', --final_completion_flag
'N', -- flow schedule
--'0' , -- Revision
15375520 --interface_id *
delete from mtl_transaction_lots_interface
where TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID = 15375519
/*2. Data inserting into mtl_transaction_lots_interface */
insert into mtl_transaction_lots_interface
(TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID,
SOURCE_CODE,
SOURCE_LINE_ID,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
LOT_NUMBER,
TRANSACTION_QUANTITY,
ERROR_CODE,
PROCESS_FLAG)
values(
15375520,--interface_id, *
1, -- Source Code
1, -- Source Line id
sysdate, -- Last update date
-1, -- Last updated by
sysdate, -- Creation Date
-1, -- Created By
'PID0190454', -- Lot number Needs input *
-30, -- Transaction Quantity
NULL,
1 -- Process Flag
Please help me ....
Thanks in advance
Balaji

It seems that 62481 may be the inventory_item_id of the assembly. Make sure you use the inventory_item_id of the component when inserting into mtl_transactions_interface.
Sandeep Gandhi

Urgent Issue in FBL5N transaction

Hi Experts,
I need your very urgent help.
I am executing FBL5N then enter inputs as 'Customer Account' , 'Company Code' and Check "Check Box: Parked Items and Open key date "today's date". Rest of the input fields are left blank. Press F8
I see Customer Line Item display as expected.
Now Issue begins here. In Quality, When I double click on any line item...It opens *Display parked customer invoice XXXXX( Transaction FV73,Program SAPMF05A Sub-Screen SAPLFDCB)
In Production, When I double click on any line item...It opens Display Parked Document : Overview ( Transaction FBL5N ,Program SAPLF040 Screen 700)
Could anybody please let me know...Why is such dual behavior of system. For same double click on Customer item line, SAP is displaying the different screen in quality and different one in Production.
Thanks in Advance.
Ratnesh

This is a user specific setting
Ask the user to go to FB00 transaction,
In that go to the line item tab and there you will find a setting "Item selection goes to", select the option you want there and the system will change the behaviour.
Thanks
Naveen

Vendor number range issue in BUCF transaction

Hi,
We are implementing the SRM 5.0 with Extended Classic scenario. I my current SRM system is already connected with 3 SAP R/3 system and I am implementing and adding 4th SAP R/3 system.
I am having an issue to replicating the vendor master from 4th R/3 system to our SRM system due to wrong number ranges in BUCF transaction code.
Current Number Range in SRM systems are:-
01     0010000000            0014999999     10003009
AB     0001000000        0009999999                        X     --> (7 Digits)
My new vendor master from 4th R/3 system is:-
0080000001        to     0080029999    --> (8 Digits)
My new vendor master number range is overlapping with my internal number range 01. As we know that we cannot reduce the lower range of 01 from 0010000000 to 0000000001. Also I cannot increase the number AB higher value from 0009999999 to 0099999999.
Can you any one please suggest me to correct the number range?
Thanks,
Senthil

Hello Senthill,
The vendor replication to external number ranges works as follows:-
(1) Cross-Application Components SAP Business Partner > Business Partne
> Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Number Ranges
Here you sould define an external number range which corresponds to
the R/3 numbers. You may want to have more than one external range
in order to replicate all vendors.
(2) Cross-Application Components > SAP Business Partner > Business Part
> Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Groupings and
Assign Number Ranges
For each replication run, you can download the vendors which correspond
to the external number range / grouping which is marked as 'standard
external'.
So, you will have to replicate your vendors separately for each number
range:-
Select the correct grouping each time by marking 'Ext.Std Grping'
and then run BBPGETVD for the vendors to be assigned to this grouping.
As standard, the customized settings for the number ranges
would have to be changed for each run of BBPGETVD and BBP_VENDOR_SYNC.
If you run the update or synchronization in combination with a
BADI the intervals could be taken into account.
The BADI is BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP
The methods are:-
Method: PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA (intitial download)
Method: PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA (update)
Import data is stored in CT_LFA1 should be copied to an
internal table. There the required intervals can be determined.
This BADI is not assigned in the IMG but can be seen through SE18.
I hope this information is helpful.
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Startroutine issue when updating transactional DSO from parallel process

Hi
I have the following issue.
In a start routine i do some processing of data. In some cases errors missing master data creates a potiential error but does not stop the processing. What i want to achieve is the following.
I have created a transactional DSO where i want to update information about the records where issues is found in processing. I use a standard ABAP modify statement to update the DSO. This works fine when i run the DTP in 1 batch process but i get errors when i run the DTP in parallel. The problem is related to the database locking of the DSO table. I have tried to play around with ENQUEUE but cant get it right.
Any input to get this to work in parallel would be appreciated.
/Chris

Hi ,
fiscal year variant, go into Customizing for Financial Accounting (FI) under Financial Accounting Global Settings >>>Fiscal Year >>>Maintain Fiscal Year Variant.
check this link ..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/50/0d89f2ad919c40b95b9ae7583c8c96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/50/0d89f2ad919c40b95b9ae7583c8c96/content.htm
Regards,
shikha

Issue on mb21 transaction

Hi sap fans,
I got one issue on mb21 ( material reservation) my client saying that while doing purchase order for every material backend one
reservation number generates automatically this reservation number automatically updates to eket, rseb table
but here my client doing reservation for same purchase order materials using
mb21 transaction in there for all materials only one reservation number will generate.
so did bdc like this fethched ekko,ekpo ,eket ,resb using given ebeln number then passed these matirials to mb21 recorded transaction but the drawback is ebeln,and ebelp fields are not available to store these values in mb21 transaction
so my client gave men another modification is if he change purchase order quantity we have compare the difference of quantity using porder material with mb21 generated reservation then do reservation for that difference quantity only else modify that quantity using mb21 transaction
mb21 generated reservation number we cant get ebeln and ebelp values so how to resolve this issue
Regards
Udaya Bhasker Bandi

hi This is issue is aswered

Oracle, Issue with Multiple transaction from two nodes.

Hi All,
Below is the scenario ,that we are encountering.
We have Client which is RAC modelled having Node1 and node2 and the server having primary and secondary nodes.
From Client we are getting multiple transactions at a rate of nano-milliseconds to the server.
Our code setup:
1) Requests would be fired from client for either insert or update into DB to a Table(Table_A).
If record exists, we are going for update or else we are inserting.
Table Structure:
Table_A Table has Primary key on Account_id
Our Scenario is that
Scenario 1:
a) Database is verifying ,if the data exists in table.
b) Data not available(record count=0) in the table and as per functionality it goes for insert query.
c) Before commit occurs, another requests comes in and checks in table for data existence.
d) Since commit is yet to happen, the count on table is ZERO and hence the second request is also coming as INSERT.
e) Since two insert on same record comes in, Unique Key Constraint Violation error is been triggered.
Scenario 2: We tried to simplify the above process by using Merge option In Oracle. But even that is not solving our concern.
Thanks

Scenario 1 - you will probably have to perform some sort of locking to prevent this issue. However, doing so will hurt scalability.
Scenario 2 - your situation sounds perfect for the MERGE statement. Can you provide more details on "But even that is not solving our concern."? What are you doing and what are you seeing?
Also, post your version.
Cheers,
Brian

JDev 9.0.3.3 Commit issue when using Transaction DataSource

Hi,
Env: JDev 9.0.3.3/WL 6.0 sp1/Oracle 8i
We have successfully deployed our application in 3-tier(remote mode) in JDev 9.0.3.2. using JClient, EO/VO, EJB Session Facade (BMT).
Now we are planning to use JDev 9.0.3.3
In JDev 9033 with the same code base we have issues after Commit.
We are using ejb.txn.type=global (default) and Weblogic Transactional DataSource. It gives following error after Committing and when we navigate to some other row:
=====================================================
[690] BaseSQLBuilder Executing DML ... (Update)
[691] Executing DML...
[692] UPDATE CISDBA.DCX_X_SAVED_SEARCH SavedSearch SET DCX_MODEL_YEAR=?,DCX_USAGE_VEHICLE_FAMILY=?,DCX_END_ITEMS=?,DCX_RECORD_STATUS=? WHERE DCX_ID=?
[693] cStmt = conn.prepareCall(" UPDATE CISDBA.DCX_X_SAVED_SEARCH SavedSearch SET DCX_MODEL_YEAR=?,DCX_USAGE_VEHICLE_FAMILY=?,DCX_END_ITEMS=?,DCX_RECORD_STATUS=? WHERE DCX_ID=?"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[694] cStmt.setObject(1, "2004"); /*DcxModelYear*/ // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[695] cStmt.setObject(2, "LX"); /*DcxUsageVehicleFamily*/ // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[696] cStmt.setObject(3, "All"); /*DcxEndItems*/ // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[697] cStmt.setObject(4, "All"); /*DcxRecordStatus*/ // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[698] // ERROR: Unknown data type java.lang.Long // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[699] cStmt.setObject(5, "206"); /*DcxId*/ // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[700] cStmt.execute(); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[701] cStmt.close(); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
BaseCostInvestCost VO before postChanges...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() before executeQuery...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() after executeQuery...
BaseCostInvestCost VO before postChanges...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() before executeQuery...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() after executeQuery...
[702] BaseSQLBuilder: releaseSavepoint 'BO_SP' ignored
[703] BaseSQLBuilder: setSavepoint 'BO_SP' ignored
BaseCostInvestCost VO before postChanges...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() before executeQuery...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() after executeQuery...
BaseCostInvestCost VO before postChanges...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() before executeQuery...
this.getWhereClause(): null
isDirty() after executeQuery...
[704] BaseSQLBuilder: releaseSavepoint 'BO_SP' ignored
[705] EJBTxnHandler: Commited txn
[706] BaseCostInvestCostView2 notify COMMIT ...
[707] BaseCostInvestCostView1 notify COMMIT ...
[708] StdCostView1 notify COMMIT ...
[709] AltCostView1 notify COMMIT ...
[710] PaperCarView1 notify COMMIT ...
[711] InvestCostItemView1 notify COMMIT ...
[712] SavedSearchView1 notify COMMIT ...
[713] AltCostView1_BaseInvestToAltViewLink_AltCostView notify COMMIT ...
[714] InvestCostItemView1_BaseInvestToInvestItemViewLink_InvestCostItemView notify COMMIT ...
[715] PaperCarView_BaseCostTrackedVehicleViewLink_PaperCarView notify COMMIT ...
[716] VehicleProgramLOV1 notify COMMIT ...
[717] SubDeptLOV1 notify COMMIT ...
[718] Transaction timeout set to 28800 secs
[719] Column count: 14
[720] ViewObject : Reusing defined prepared Statement
[721] QueryCollection.executeQuery failed...
[722] java.sql.SQLException: The transaction is no longer active (status = Committed). No further JDBC access is allowed within this transaction.
     void weblogic.jdbcbase.jts.Connection.checkIfRolledBack()
          Connection.java:468
     void weblogic.jdbcbase.jts.Statement.setMaxRows(int)
          Statement.java:179
     void weblogic.jdbc.rmi.internal.StatementImpl.setMaxRows(int)
          StatementImpl.java:82
     void weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialStatement.setMaxRows(int)
          SerialStatement.java:132
     void oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.executeQuery(java.lang.Object[], int)
          QueryCollection.java:534
     void
===================================================

Hi Carsten,
I tried to reproduce your problem, but couldn't. Let me explain what steps I executed and perhaps you can advise where I've not matched your steps.
--Using build jdeveloper 9.0.3.3.1203, I built a new bc4j project containing a dept-emp default bc4j project (deptEntity, empEntity, deptView, empView, deptempFKAssoc, deptempFKViewLink, ApplicationModule).
--In dos shell, I went to the directory \jdevdir\jdev\bin and ran setvars -go to set the correct jdk version
--In the dos shell, in the directory \jdevdir\j2ee\home I executed the following command to install oc4j:
java -jar oc4j.jar (defaults pswd to welcome for admin)
--I remoted the appmodule to EJB Session Bean (BMT) and created a new deployment profile using the 9ias configuration for the application module.
--I deployed the bc4j objects to oc4j
--I created a new project
--In this project I created a new jclient master-detail form using the above project's application module for the data model
--I saved all and compiled the jclient project
--I ran the jclient form and inserted a master record
--I committed the transaction successfully
--I browsed records, then edited a record
--I committed the transaction successfully, then browsed.
Is there something I've missed? Did you migrate your project and not start by creating a new project? Is there something special about the database schema you are using?
Thanks,
Amy

Issue in invoice while issuing output in Transaction VF01

Hi,
If I issue the invoice through the transaction it is showing the wrong net amount in VF01 and it is showing the correct amount if I issue through VF02.
Also, I found that in the processing log it is showing me one error saying one element is not defined for the form.
Thanks,
srinivas.

-

Issue in vl10b transaction in SHP_VL10_DELIVERY_CREATE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for