Issue more than Planned in Production Order

Hi All,
I have a problem with 2007B SP00 PL11 for Issue for Production.
In 2005B, I can issue the BOM Components more than planned. But in 2007B version, I am unable to issue more than planned. When I right-click at Production Order to Issue Component or at Issue for Production and copy from Production order. no items are displayed.
I have already issued in full at the 1st issue. Then subsequently, i need to issue some more qty for certain components. But i am unable to do that.
Has this feature of issue more been changed in 2007B?
What other method can be adopted without changing the planned qty?
Please advise.
Regards
Jessie

Hi guys,
Thanks for the fast response.
Duplicate the previous issue to create the over-issue is not a good solution. It is very troublesome. itis not a good procedure to ask customers to do this step.
Changing of the planned qty will mean that i am not able to trace my initial plan and have to go back to the BOM. again, this is not logical. especially when the queries are using figures directly from production order tables.
Since it can be done in 2005 version, why is SAP taking it out this feature in 2007?

Similar Messages

  • MRP, more than planned order in one purchase ru00E9quisition.

    Hello, friends
    I have a problem with the MRP system that, we want to collect or convert more than planned order into one purchase requisition.
    Regards.

    Lamier,
    Purchase requisitions typically are never seen by Suppliers.  They are internal documents to be managed by people in your  own company.
    There are several ways to manage your business requirement.  Many companies use purchasing scheduling agreements, and some companies will automatically send the schedules to the Vendor.   Refer to  http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/75/ee0f7455c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm  Other companies will select all of the approved/released purchase requisitions and copy them into a single Purchase order, which is then transmitted to the vendor using standard methods.  Review this and other tips in http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/75/ee11d955c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm
    For businesses where standard ERP functionality is inadequate, It is also possible to create custom development that will meet any business requirement.
    If you are unsatisfied with the standard functionality offerings available in SAP ERP, you should contact Walldorf.  Alternatively, SAP generally listens to the larger user groups, such as ASUG here in the US. I imagine that Algeria also is covered by a similar group.  If enough people in the user groups ask for the same functionality, SAP is more likely to place it into future offerings.
    http://www.asug.com/
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Want to Prevent Inventory Transfer More than Planned Quantity

    Dear Experts,
    I want to Prevent Inventory Transfer More than Planned Quantity. so that No one can Post any Issue for Production More than Planned Quantity has Assigned that Production Order. Using SAP Business One B1 .
    Please Advice ......
    Thanks In Advance ,
    Ajibul Hakim

    Hello Gordon,
    Thanks for your Reply . I want to Prevent Inventory transfer , which will Exceed the Planned Limit. but yesterday I Have Tried Myself again and I have succeed ! so thanks you again ,
    Also thanks to Nagarajan for your kind reply and i wanted to do like that but I want to restrict Inventory transfer...
    I have Done Like this....
    IF @object_type='67' 
      BEGIN
      IF @transaction_type='A' OR @transaction_type='U'-----Add
          BEGIN
            IF exists(SELECT * FROM  WTR1 T0
          LEFT JOIN OWTR T1 ON T1.DocEntry=T0.DocEntry
            WHERE  (T0.U_PlanQTY<(T0.Quantity+T0.U_TotalIssue)) AND T1.U_OrderType='100'
                         AND T0.DocEntry=@list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
            BEGIN
             SET @ERROR=1
             SELECT @ERROR_message = N'Issued Quantity Can not More than Planned Qty ,Check again and reconfirm please '
            END
          END   
       END
    Thanks,
    Ajibul Hakim
    Message was edited by: Ajibul Hakim

  • No Recieving more than planned Quantity

    Hi All,
    My client want that no user can recieve FG more than planned Quantity in Production Order. I Put a query in SP_Transaction Notification but its not working.
    IF (@object_type = '59' AND @transaction_type= 'A')
    BEGIN
    If exists
    (Select p.Type
    From OIGN b
      inner join IGN1 bs
         On b.DocEntry=bs.DocEntry and bs.LineNum=0
      inner join OWOR p On p.DocEntry=bs.BaseEntry
    Where b.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
       and p.Type= 'S'
       and bs.BaseType=202
       and p.PlannedQty< p.CmpltQty )
    Begin
    set @error =1
    set @error_message = 'You can not Complete more then planned !'
    End
    Regards
    Piyush

    Hi Piyush,
    Try this:
    If (@object_type = '59' and @transaction_type = 'A')
    Begin
       If (Select CurSource From OIGN Where DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del) = 'L'
       Begin
          If((Select Sum(Z.Quantity) From IGN1 Z Where Z.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del) > (Select PlannedQty From OWOR Where DocNum = (Select A.BaseRef From IGN1 A Where A.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del)))
           Begin
                  Select @error = 1
                  Select @error_message = 'Quantity Exceeds Planned Quantity!!'
          End
       End
    End
    Thanks,
    Neetu

  • Issue regarding Batch determination in Production order as per Expiry date.

    Dear all,
                    first of all  happy Navratri.
    I have issue regarding batch determination in production order.
    I have to compare P.O header materialu2019s expiry date and issuing components expiry date at the time of batch determination.
    lets take example,  Material having self life is u201CXu201D years and batch determination against PO is based on FEFO with the help of self life we can determine Expiry date of manufacturing material  suppose it is u201CYu201D  I have to introduce restriction at the time of good issue if expiry date of issuing components u201CZu201D is less than expiry date u201CYu201D.
    Please give your valuable suggestions either standard or through SAP enhancements.
    thanks & Regards
    SIVA

    Dear
    Thanks for your reply, i am layman about batch derivation can u elaborate it.
    Thanks & Regard

  • HT1420 i have more than 5 apple products.  how can i get them to all be authorized under one id?

    I have more than 5 apple products and I want to have them all autorized under one id.  How do I do that for the itunes?  It seems ridiculous that apple would limit me to 5 products or less.

    The limit is 5 computers and as far as I know that can't be increased- are you including iPads, iPhones and/or iPod Touches in your products ? If so then they don't count towards the 5.

  • Goods Issue To Each Operation Of Production Order?

    As we know, in SAP ,when we create and realse the production order,we could posts good issue to the production order ,using MB1A. And in SAP , the components can be assigned to the operations of the finished product.
    But in our company, the production order will take long time,and during production,different materials will be used in different phase of the production order,that means different components will be used for different operations.
    And for some reason,we don't want our material to be backflushed during production.
    So I want to ask can we post goods issue to each operation of the production order,not to the whole production order? Can SAP support Post Goods Issue To Each Operation Of Production Order?
    What shall we do if we want do this?By ABAP development ? Or there is third party software
    can do this with SAP? 
    Thanks for any reply!
    Edited by: Fei Liu on Mar 14, 2009 4:56 PM

    Hi Fei,
    As explained above, i think the concept of releasing the individual operations instead of releasing the order at header level would work fine for your requirement.
    Steps:
    1. Go to operation page in co02.
    2. Select the first operation, at the bottom of the screen you would find a Green Flag, click on the same.
    3. You will now find that the status of the first operation has changed to REL, while the others are still not.
    4. At header level you will find a status PREL, indicating partial release.
    5. After completion of the first operation, confirm the same & select the second operation & click release, & the process follows in this manner
    6. Please do not click the green flag at the header level as this will release the entire order.
    Pre-requisite:
    1. You have assigned components to the respective operations.
    You might also want to consider the usage of trigger points. This you can assign to each operation, where-in if the status changes to CNF, you trigger the release of the following operation. But before opting for this flow, first do it manually to ensure it meets your need.
    Also if the components assigned to the same operation, needs to be issued at different date, then you can use the lead time offset in BOM. In cs02, go to item details, here you can specify the same. Eg: If your operation stats on 15th March & you want this component to be issue only on 17th March, then specify the offset as 2. But if you want the components to be issued 2 days in advance of 15th march, then specify as 2-.
    Hope the above helps.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Issuing a handling unit to production order

    Hi
    Is it possible to issue a handling unit to production order. Kindly through some tips in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    Saravana Kumar

    hi Sarvana,
    a handling unit consists of altogether several contents items that are listed as
    >full delivery items,
    >partial delivery items,
    >or even further handling units
    So from the above the handling unit consist of the items for delivery and are packed in one packaging
    material (box). The packaging material and the materials it contains form a handling unit that is
    assigned to a delivery and can be moved within the warehouse. The content of the handling unit is not significant for Warehouse Management. In fact, the contents can only be determined by referring to the delivery.
    So a HU can't be assigned to the production order within the same plant.
    for further assistance you can check the following link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/16/4bad1ba63611d2b44e006094b9b9dd/frameset.htm.
    hope this helps to answer your question,
    with regards,

  • Planned and production order

    Hi,
    what is meant by planned and production order?
    I have to list planned order,production order and stocks that are cancelled or rejected?
    How to do that?
    ASAP
    thanx,
    sudha

    Hi,
    A planned order is sent to a plant and is an MRP request for the procurement of a particular material at a determined time. It specifies when the inward material movement should be made and the quantity of material that is expected.
    It can be changed or deleted at any time (exceptions: planned orders for direct production and for direct procurement).
    Planned orders are converted into production orders for in-house production and into purchase requisitions for external procurement.
    In contrast to planned orders, production orders and purchase requisitions are fixed receipt elements, which commit to the procurement.
    By means of table,
    Planned order is : PLAF-PLNUM ;
    and Production Order is AFKO-AUFNR .
    You can trace the relationship by using tcode : MD13 ( PlOrder) and MD4C (PrOrder).
    Rgds,
    TS Winedya

  • To issue the component to the Production Order

    Hello All,
    I have assigned the component to the Operation of Production Order from Different plant(say 1100) of Same company code(1000).
    I want to issue that material from that plant to this plant (say 1000) of Production Order.
      So my question is the correct method of directly issuing the component to this Production Order of different plant.
    Shailendra

    Hi  HAdkar
    The correct procedure is .
    You have to assign special procurement key 80 in material master for which you want to procure from plant 1100. The material master of procuring material should exist for the plant 1100. While running MPR the procurement proposal will be automatically created in the 1100 plant. From 1100 plant you do stock transfer to your storage location. Then finally do GI for the header prod order in you plant.
    This is the procure in SAP. Eventhough both the plants exist in the same compound.
    Regards
    J . Saravan

  • Find Planned and Production Orders

    Hi all ,
    I have a requirement . If i give the Work center Name i should get already assigned Planned Orders or Open Production Order against that Work center .
    Please let me know . If there is no standard FM then let me know can i retrieve those from any tables .
    I appreciate for any suggestions .
    Regards
    Raj

    Hello Raj
    Please note that your "objective" (Find planned and Production Orders) has little to do with object orientation.
    Function module BAPI_ALM_ORDEROPER_GET_LIST is probably the one you are looking for. You need to feed TABLES parameter IT_RANGES with the appropriate values.
    Please note that the selection parameters have special names that can be found in the structures defined in fm IBAPI_ALM_ORDEROPER_GETLIST:
    * set some local constants:
      constants:
        lc_progname like rsvar-report value 'RIAFVC20',
        lc_par_int  type ddobjname value 'IBAPI_ORDER_LISTOPER_PARAMS',
        lc_par_ext  type ddobjname value 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_LISTOPER_PARAMS',
        lc_sel_int  type ddobjname value 'IBAPI_ORDER_LISTOPER_SELOPS',
        lc_sel_ext  type ddobjname value 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_LISTOPER_SELOPS'.
    Example: If you want to select for a specific work center then I assume the selection parameter is:
    (BAPI_ALM_ORDER_LISTOPER_SELOPS-) OPTIONS_FOR_WORK_CNTR
    Thus, to select for a given work center add the following record to IT_RANGES:
    FIELDNAME = 'OPTIONS_FOR_WORK_CNTR'   " presumably without the DDIC structure name
    SIGN = 'I'
    OPTION = 'EQ'
    LOW = <work center>
    If the selection does not work then just do a little debugging.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • Prevent Component Issue More than Service Order Quantity

    Dear Experts,
    We are able to Issue Materials to Service Order(CS) more than the Material Quantity in the Service Order.
    Our Requirement is to prevent this . Please help.
    Regards,
    Shareeq

    Dear Tejasg,
    Your post was an Useful information.
    The required configuration can be done at.
    ECC 5.0
    SPRO-> Plant Maintenance and Custmer Service ->Maintenance and Service Processing->Maintenance and Service Orders->Funtions and settings of Order Types->Goods Movement for Order ->Define Documentation of Order.
    Regards,
    Shareeqq
    Edited by: K M AHAMED SHAREEQ HUSSAIN on Mar 13, 2010 11:22 AM

  • Performance Issue, Unable to pull all production Orders in given statuses

    HI All,
    I have a requirement to pull all production orders that are in the created or released status and then action some different things in the program such as adjusting dates, etc. The issue I'm having is that as the volume of production orders grows the select statement stops being able to complete and pull these production orders. I've tweaked this before and it was able to work for a few weeks but has now reached it's limit again. I tried using the trace and SE30 to analyze the program as I've read suggested here, however it's been difficult to try adjustments as the program runs in about 3 second in the development environment. Our quality environment, which has roughly half the volume of the production system ran in about 15 seconds. So I am unable to duplicate the issue until the program is moved to production.
    Here is the select statement:
      SELECT k~aufnr
        FROM aufk as k INNER JOIN afko as f ON f~aufnr = k~aufnr
          INNER JOIN jest as j ON k~objnr = j~objnr
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_aufk
        WHERE k~aufnr IN s_aufnr     "Order Number select option
          AND k~werks IN s_werks             "Plant select option
          AND k~auart EQ u2018PP01u2019              "PP01 std orders only
          AND k~kokrs EQ u20181000u2019              "Seneca Controlling Area
          AND k~autyp EQ u201810u2019                "PP Production Order
          AND k~loekz EQ space                 "Deletion indicator
          AND ( j~stat EQ u2018I001u2019             "CTRD, created status
            OR  j~stat EQ u2018I002u2019 )           "REL, released status
          AND j~inact EQ space.              "status not inactive
    There are a couple thoughts I have to try, but I don't know of any good way to verify if helping given the volume differences until in production so am looking for feedback. Here's the ideas:
    1. Use the field IDAT2 in AUFK to determine if an order is not TECO'd , rather than using the JEST table. Testing this in Dev had increased run time versus how I have it written now, but may be helpful with larger volume and/or if an index is put on this field. Thoughts?
    2. Separate the select statements to read AUFK and JEST separately and instead use the FOR ALL ENTRIES command. Seems to be a lot of conflicting thoughts on which works better, thoughts on this particular case?
    Also, there is another program that pulls only production orders in Created status, and it doesn't have this same issue.
    Thanks in advance for any help,
    Kyndal
    Edited by: Kyndal Copley on Oct 1, 2009 6:46 PM

    I have three recommendations for your join.
    1) Assuming that fields AUART and KOKRS are always known (constants) I recommend that you move them up in the where clause (like illustrated) to ensure that the system uses index C.
    2) AUTYP EQ '10' seems superflous. In addition it seems to increase the search time. Check with your functional consultant if there could be a production order with AUART EQ 'PP01' and AUTYP NE '10'. If you will never encounter this situation it makes more sense to drop the clause AUTYP EQ '10'.
    3) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE usually takes longer than INTO TABLE. Define the table with AUFK with just field AUFNR so that you can use the clause INTO TABLE.
    SELECT k~aufnr
      FROM       aufk AS k
      INNER JOIN afko AS f
      ON f~aufnr EQ k~aufnr
      INNER JOIN jest AS j
      ON k~objnr EQ j~objnr
      INTO TABLE it_aufk
      WHERE k~auart EQ 'PP01'
      AND   k~kokrs EQ '1000'
      AND   k~aufnr IN s_aufnr
      AND   k~werks IN s_werks
      AND   k~loekz EQ space
      AND ( j~stat  EQ 'I001' OR j~stat EQ 'I002' )
      AND   j~inact EQ space.

  • Consumption acct of materia which issue to maint. ord. and production order

    Hi all,
    I have one problem with the cost report for maintenance orders.
    I have one material code, such as we call A.
    Mat. A is issued to production order and also maintenance order.
    For production order, consumption account is 123
    For maintenance order, consumption account is 456
    I have defined new movement type for issuing to Maintenance order is ZB1
    in OBYC:
          GBB - VRB --> 123
          ZB1  --> 456
    So for accounting purpose, I can slit these consumption accounts
    However, when  I go to maintenance order cost reports, systems slit these cost into 2 line
    Material  A        Acct. Cons 123        Plan cost 100        Actual cost 0
    Material   A        Acct. Cons  456       Plan cost 0            Actual cost 120
    How can I group into  1 line ?
    Edited by: Emily Nguyen on Jun 2, 2009 12:15 PM

    Hi Emily
    In OBYC you can configure GL accounts per valuation class.
    You cannot configure Movement type wise. Each General modifier is linked with movement types.
    We cannot give two consumption accounts for one valuation class in VBR.
    Run your plan cost again.
    Thanks
    Kiran A

  • Issue in committing material for production order

    Hi, we are facing an error situation that when we try to release production order there came an issue that few component committed quantity is less than required quantity. When we check the stock of the components they were having enough stock to consider for this production order.
    What could be the other reasons or cause for this situation. Can any one suggest for the correction action.
    would reservation cause this problem when i check the component availability overview it has ATP 0.   will it cause this.
    When i look in to the system there were several Orders that were in CRT state that were using same components as used in the current order under discussion.
    Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 3:16 AM

    Hi All
    Even MD04 also seems to be showing as if the material is available.  Pl. see the data against 13/12 hereunder.
    06.01.2011     Stock                                                            6,370/      6,370
    08.12.2010     Ord.DS     4604767106/00100                         80-/     6,290
    09.12.2010     OrdRes     420252                         2,740-/     3,550
    13.12.2010     OrdRes     420268                         3,420-/     130
    availability overview CO09 shows as follows for the component:
    13.12.2010     OrdRes     Totals record     3,420-(receipt/req)       0(confirmed)
    13.12.2010     OrdRes     420268                          3,420-(receipt/req)        0(confirmed)                       0(ATP quantity)
    scope of check:
    to include
    purchase order
    include dependent requirements
    sales requirements
    deliveries
    include shipment notifications
    all reservations
    check releases for transport orders only
    take all productions orders into account.
    With this scenario what can i do get it working.
    Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 6:46 AM
    Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 6:59 AM
    Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 7:00 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can i open my pdf files on surface rt desktop

    i can't seem to open pdf files on the desktop

  • Error in using complete() method along with Pop-up.

    Hi All, I m working on NWDS 7.1(CE) and using GP interface. The scenario is on click of a button,'Proceed', a pop-up opens which ask for a confirmation and if this is 'yes', then i have to call complete() method. When i m doing so,i m getting followi

  • The option " open in low resolution " in not there

    When i right click on any app ,, and go to " Get info "  the option  " open in low resolution " in not there , my OS is up to date as well the app i clicked on and its happen on all apps ,,, why ? macbook pro reitna 2.7 16gb

  • Buttons and Sub Forms

    Been new to LiveCycle, I have managed to create some basic forms but would like to know the best way of creating a menu and depending on which menu choice the user makes then only subform appears and the others are invisible. So if the user is offere

  • User Exit for Requisition Release Strategy

    Hi All, Is anyone able to provide any guidance on determining the release strategy of a purchase requisition via a user exit? It has become neccessary to do this due to certain shortcomings of the classes and characteristic functionality. I believe i