Issue regarding Parallel dynamic block

Dear All,
I need some help regarding Parallel dynamic process issue.
My Process structure as follows.
Process
->Sequential Block
--->Action1
--->Parallel Dynamic Block
>Sequential Sub Block
>Action2
I am able to trigger the tasks to multiple users.
Action2 has to perform by multiple users.
Action2 contains Webdynpro Callable Object.
Webdynpro CO view contains two buttons namely "Approve" and "Send Back".
My requirement is
1)If All users selects approve then Action2 has to complete and control moves to Action1
2)If anyone selects Send Back then Action2 will be completed and control moves to Action1.This process will be continues still all the users Approve.
I am struggling for this requirement so please help me.

Hi Rajesh,
Question 1:
I am trying to call the Action1 in the Sequential Sub Block from Action 2.At that time i am gettin the following error.
Transition between blocks cannot be defined because there is a parallel block in the path.
@nswer 1:
Please include "Action2 " and "Action1(On Send Back from Action2)" in the subblock.
If both the actions are in the same sequential block (sub-block) then you can set result state.
Question 2:
Please suggest me what to set result state of Action2 when it is completed and how to call Action3.
Tell me Action3 comes under Sequential Block?
@nswer 1:
Action2 must have two result state
1. Completed -- Assign it "Terminal"
2. Send Back -- Assign it "Action1(On Send Back from Action2)"
Action3 is outside Parallel Dynamic Block. The structure of your sequential block will look like this
Process
->Sequential Block
--->Action1
--->Parallel Dynamic Block
--->Action3
Regards,
Pratik

Similar Messages

Regarding Parallel Dynamic Block

Hi,
I tried to use PDB (Parallel dynamic block). But it is behaving differently that, I assigned action to 3 users and then the task is appearing in all of the 3 users uwl.But while any of the one user started working on that then remaining users uwl task got disappeared or seems locked or terminated. I did not understand why it is happening like this. can you please help me to solve this issue.
My process structure is mentioning below:
Process
Init Block (Sequential block)
Input action
Block (PDB)
output block (parallel block)
output action
Is there any alternative way to do this if PDB will not solve this issue?
Is it possible to create actions dynamically in a block. suppose this block is creates statically as a parallel block.?
Mahesh please help me if you have any idea or information about this.
thanks in advance,
Sajith

Hi Dipankar,
Thanks for ur response.But that form is not going parallel to same users.and i have other problem.If that form go to multiple users.
That form has to states Approved and rejected.Though any one of them rejected that process must be continuously.not to be terminated.
If u have any idea /if u worked on same Scenario pl z send document.
Thanks,
Santhosh

How to use parallel dynamic block in guided procedures!!

hi
My application is as following i have to initiate a process from a webdynpro for java application and after that i have to send the action to the multiple users..
For that i created a parallel block inside that a sequential block and inside that an action .
In my wdj coding i created a variable user and assigned this parameter for the role of that action.
But the problem is it is not going to the multiple users.
pls suggest me if there is some other solutions to do this.....
Pls give me a solution it is urgently needed
With regards
Shanto Aloor
Edited by: Armin Reichert on Jun 18, 2008 12:11 PM

Hi,
Refer this
Regarding Parallel Dynamic Block

Urgent ......!!!!!how to use parallel dynamic block in guided procedures!!

hi
My application is as following i have to initiate a process from a webdynpro for java application and after that i have to send the action to the multiple users..
For that i created a parallel block inside that a sequential block and inside that an action .
In my wdj coding i created a variable user and assigned this parameter for the role of that action.
But the problem is it is not going to the multiple users.
pls suggest me if there is some other solutions to do this.....
Pls give me a solution it is urgently needed
With regards
Shanto Aloor

Hi,
Refer this
Regarding Parallel Dynamic Block

Problem in Parallel Dynamic Block

Hi All
I have a scenario in GP,
An initiator will make request and he/she want to get approval from multiple approvers. So the request want to go multiple users at a time.
Here I tried this with one Sequential block and a Parallel dynamic block.
In Sequential block I created inputform callable object using webdynpro DC and in Parallel dynamic block also created approval form using webdynpro DC.
Here i am facing a problem, while reaching the form to approval users, if any of the approver open it executed and submitted all other approver actions are also terminating or the inbox content is disapearing.
I want to exit from the Parallel dynamic block only after finishing all of the approvers submition.
Is any setting or modifications can be done to achieve this?
If anybody knows about this problem please reply me.
regards
Sajith

Hi Sajith
I think you are attaching multiple users to the same action (having approval form Callable Object). This will send the action to multiple approvals, but the process will be terminated on approval from any one of the multiple approvers. Due to this the request goes off from other approver's inbox.
I think for your scenario you can have a sequential block in which you pass the approver action to next approver only when the previous approver has approved it. You can do this by keeping a decision dialog process control, which gives you two actions approve and reject.
This will send the initiators request to multiple approvers and for the last approver you can terminate the process.
Parallel Dynamic Block is used for a scenario where you have to take a vote or survey, in this case you pass the survey document to multiple users (and multiple users are decided at runtime).
Please go thru this link to understand the Parallel Dynamic Block properly.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/7e5b306b3b2679e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
Regards,
Anish

GP task dissappers in parallel dynamic block

hi,,
I want to use gp workflow using webdynpro development component callabale objects.
The flow is an initiator will initiate a task , it goes to 3 different users only after the three approvers have approved, it should move to the third single approver.
So i have used parallel dynamic block in the second step and the callable object is of webdynpro development component type .Now when an initiator initiates a task the three approves are getting the task.If any one approves also the task disappers form the other two users and moves to the next level.
I want the task to be moved to the next level only after if all the three users have approved.
please help....
Thanks in advance,
shami.

hi,
thanks for ur response.
From the initiator the process should go to three approvers simultaneously.
And then only after the three approvers have approved it should go to the third level approver.
how can this be achived..
thanks in advance.
shami.

Assigning roles to Parallel dynamic block-multiusers

Hi David,
I am using PDB in that one sequential block is used , which I am assigning to multiple users.I have assigned the role in Process- Default role tab.
Parallel dynamic block
Sequential block
Action1----
assigning multiuser
Every thing is working fine except when PDB will execute it will go to all users UWL but one user will complete the process, other user's process will not be able to complete the process.that process will end there.
Do you have any guideline for this?
Yogesh

Hi Yogesh,
Select the sequential block(body block) under the PDB and open the Roles tab. There select the option "Filled From Conext Parameter" and in the drop-down that appears select the user id. You must have an input parameter defined for all the COs present under the PDB type string and which is mapped to a username/role/group at parameter grouping.
Refer this document for step-by-step guide : <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fe43ced1-0c01-0010-10ae-bc49598b18f6">Using Parallel Dynamic Block and Dynamic User Assignment (GP)</a>
Thanks,
Dipankar

Passing Multi line values to Parallel Dynamic Block.

Hi All,
In process structure as follows.
Process:
Sequential Block:
->Action1:
DDPTSStatus(0..n)
ReqSequence(0..n)
ListofStakeHoldersforApproval(0..n)
Action2:
DDPTSStatus(0..n)
ReqSequence(0..n)
ListofStakeHoldersforApproval(0..n)
PDB Block:
->Sequential Block:
-->Action3:
Multiline Input
--->DDPTSStatus(0..n)
--->ReqSequence(0..n)
--->ListofStakeHoldersforApproval(0..n)
Multiline OutPut
--->DDPTSStatus(0..n)
--->ReqSequence(0..n)
--->ListofStakeHoldersforApproval(0..n)
Sequential Block:
->Action4:
DDPTSStatus(0..n)
ReqSequence(0..n)
ListofStakeHoldersforApproval(0..n)
I have done parameter grouping for PDB Multiline input (nodes) with Output of Action2 nodes at process level.
While i am trying to initiate action for Multiple users it is getting tasks in all users who are initiated but if one person performs the task action remaining users wont get the task and it will show No activity Present.
I think when i am Passing the values from Action2 output to PDB Action Input the problem is.
I am pasting the code which i wrote complete method of Action2 CO setting values for Multiline Input please correct me if i am wrong
IGPStructure output = executionContext.getOutputStructure();
for(int i=0;i<2;i++)
{ IGPStructure struct_ddptsStatus_out =
output.addStructure("DDPTSStatus");
// Set the values of the output parameters
/////////////development comments/////////////////
struct_ddptsStatus_out.setAttributeValue(
"Status",
wdContext
.nodeVn_DDPTSStatus()
.getCurrentElement()
.getAttributeValue(
"va_status")); }
executionContext.setResultState("Success");
executionContext.processingComplete();
Please tell me whether this code is correct.
Regards,
Rajesh

Solved on my OWN.....
Edited by: RAJESH NIMMAKAYALA on Jul 28, 2009 10:44 AM

Multiple user in a parallel dynamic process step?

Hi,
anyone an idea how to address an process step in an parallel dynamic block simultaneously to multiple users?
I already tried the Assign Users to Process Role-Callable Object. Unfortunately each added user to one step in the parallel dynamic block was added to the same step in each parallel thread.
Any suggestions how to solve this problem in a other way?
Thanks and best regards
Robert

WKAriyoshi wrote:
Is there a way to execute the Prompt User for Input in parallel process while executing the read data part? Is there another way to request a password from the user?
Executing these tasks (reading from instrument AND prompting user for inputs) in parallel loops can solve your problem instantly, if you can share the code, one can pin point what & where exactly changes are required or parallel loop can be included (along with any other changes which might be required).
I am not allergic to Kudos, in fact I love Kudos.
Make your LabVIEW experience more CONVENIENT.

Parallel Conditional Block Example

I am new to Guided Procedures. I am trying to create a process that has a parallel conditional block where the block would execute when an output parameter equals some value. All the examples seem to have just simple sequential blocks. Can anyone point me in the right direction/reference?? I am sure this is very simple for you GP wizards.
Thanks.

One way for you to go about it is:
- first you need create one main sequential block B1 that'll contain the parallel dynamic block B2
- then you need your parallel dynamic block B2 that'll contain sequential blocks (B3 and B4) for each branching
The first callable object of your parallel dynamic block will be a "decision value" callable object. Based on the result of the decision value, the block B3 or B$ will be choosen.
Straightforward and easy to test. I mean normally

Issues with parallel processing in Logical Database PCH and PNP

Has anyone encountered issues when executing programs in parallel that utilizes the logical database PCH or PNP?
Our scenario is the following:
We having have 55 concurrent jobs that execute a program that use the logical database PCH at a given time. We load the the PCHINDEX table with the code below.
      wa_pchindex-plvar = '01'.
      wa_pchindex-otype = 'S'.
      wa_pchindex-objid_low = index_objid.
      APPEND wa_pchindex TO pchindex.
We have seen instances where when the program is executed in parallel, with each process having its own range of positions id's, that some positions are dropped or some are added that is outside the range of the given process.
For example:
process 1 has a range of positions ID's 1-10
process 2 has a range of positions ID's 11-20
process 3 has a range of positions ID's 21-30
Process 3 drops position 25 and adds position 46.
Has anyone faced a similar issue?
Thanks for your help.
Best Regards,
Duke

Hi,
first of all, you should read [Using Parallel Execution|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14223/usingpe.htm#DWHSG024] in documentation for your version - almost all of these topics are covered there.
1. According to my server specification how much DOP i can specify.It depends not only on number of CPU. More important factors are settings of PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS and PARALLEL_ADAPTIVE_MULTI_USER.
2. Which option for Setting Parallel is good - Using the 'alter table A parallel 4' or passing the parallel hints in the sql statementsIt depends on your application. When setting PARALLEL on a table, all SQL dealing with that table would be considered for parallel execution. So if it is normal for your app to use parallel access to that table, it's OK. If you want to use PX on a limited set of SQL, then hints or session settings are more appropriate.
3. We have a batch processing jobs which are loading data into the tables from flat files (24*7) using sql loader. is it possible to parallel this operation and any negative effect if enabled parallel.Yes, refer to documentation.
4. Query or DML - which one will be perform best with parallel option.Both may take advantages of using PX (with some restrictions to Parallel DML) and both may run slower than non-PX versions.
5. What are the negative issue if parallel option is enabled.1) Object checkpoint happens before starting parallel FTS (true for >=10gR2, before that version tablespace checkpoint was used)
2) More CPU and memory resources are used with PX - it may be both benefit and an issue, especially with concurrent PX.
6. what are the things to be taken care while enabling the parallel option.Read the documentation - it contains almost all you need to know. Since you are using RAC, you sould not forget about method of PX slaves load balancing between nodes. If you are on 10g, refer to INSTANSE_GROUPS/PARALLEL_INSTANCE_GROUPS parameters, if you are using 11g then properly configure services.

Parallel insert blocked on business table

Hi guru, i've got this problem: parallel insert blocked on the same table. This event is periodic and the name table change of time in time.
Version SAP is R/3 Enterprise 4.7 witn DB ORACLE 9.2.0.8 on SO AIX 5.3 ( ML 10)
Thank You for yuor support
MC

You need to provide more info that that.... whats the context?, whats the error?, is this a question or a statement?
Read the "Rules of Engagement"
Regards
Juan

I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID # V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
WiltonA_VZW
VZW Support
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

same problem for me. I am using abe edition 3 as I don't think 4 can be used with kobo. Book has been downloaded to kobo but it can't be read as it is not authorised.Help please

Issue regarding Parallel dynamic block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for