Issue w RSCUSTV23 Analysis Authorization System after upg from BW3.5 to BI7

We set it to "Obsolete Concept with RSR Authorization Objects" and we do no understand why from the suddenly changes to
"Current Procedure with Analysis Authorization" from no where - any ideas why from the sudden this changes by itself?
still were not not migrating our security to the new version...we will do it around april...but in the meanwhile i would like ot understand why is happening by itself.
thanks,

Note that the logging will probably only help you if you activate it in the transport tool profiles (STMS) as it sounds to me as if imports of the customizing are making this setting.
Did you set the value in DEV and transport it through or did you use one of the "BW utility reports" to change it (in which case you do not always have change documents and inconsistent customizing is "by design"...).
Cheers,
Julius

Similar Messages

Work book size increased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7

Hi Experts
work book size increased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7
our client runs the report using BI web report and exports to excel sheet.
she asks us to investigate why the size of the work book isincreased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7.
please let me know what you think.
thank you for reading this.
Regards
satish

ANY suggestion would be greatly appreciated

Testing of SAP BW system after migration from OS Unix to windows

Hi Experts,
I am working on a project wherein testing of BW system is required after migration from OS Unix to Windows.
If any one has done same set of activities in past or has any idea of this, please share all major test steps required after migration.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi Neeraj,
I will paste the list we used for our upgrade from 3.1 to 7.0. I removed some company specific details. Sorry for the "lay-out", it is copied from excel, this messes up the whole message.
best regards, André.
Preparation     PHASE 1
Review New Functionality     Review BW section on SAPNet for latest information on new release
Confirm Upgrade Timing (First Sat)
GUI Upgrade     Install GUI's for Upgrade Test persons
"Check Prerequisites     -Operating System
-SAP Kernel
-DBMS
-Disk space
-R/3 plugin
-BW software version and SP
Citrix.."
"Check Compatibility Reqs with other systems     APO
ECC6.0"
Check Compatibility Reqs with 3rd party software     ?
"Test Team 2004s Delta Training     To
have idea on new functionality
not have confusion if looks different.."
"End User Communication: upgraded system and changes     e.g. right vs left click
- send out communication twice"
End User Communication: several "look and feel" sessions NOTE: incorporate WISBECH !!!
Setup Portal connected to BW QA for testing once upgraded     Setup Portal connected to BW DEV for testing once upgraded
Check best go live date - based on assuption 2 days needed
Determine test set - based on input BS / KU
Estimate resources Business for testing
BluePrint     PHASE 2
Check/CleanUp Development Objects     Check all open and not-released developments for release prior to upgrade
Prepare System Setup     Prepare (if needed) flat-files for test loads
Check OSS for release notes on objects     Each functional area should check out OSS for release notes on objects (for changes etcu2026, new functionality)
"Prepare (detail) list of objects to be tested     Complete list of objects to be tested, special attention to custom/non-standard programs, enhancements. List of:
- extractors
- process chains
- reports"
"Setup delta mechanisms (create transaction data)     BackEnd Test: Financial Extraction and load, process chains
u2022tbd
u2022
u2022 "
Verification / creation of process chains     Check existence of to-be-tested process chains; if none, create 'sample' process chains
Realization     PHASE 3
Prior to Upgrade: Install any necessary frontend software
Prior to Upgrade: Install any necessary frontend software (end-users)
Prior to Upgrade: Complete any extraction - suspend V3 and scheduled BW jobs
Create Sandbox
Connect Sandbox to external systems (connections/BDLS)
Pre-upgrade steps
Perform Upgrade of BW
Check connection with R/3/APO
Perform system backup
"BackEnd Test: Logistics extraction and load, process chains
u2022 Z_example_CHAIN
u2022 2lis_03_BF and 2lis_03_BX     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Sales Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 Z_SALES_1
u2022 all lis extractors:
u2022 12_vcitm
u2022 13_vditm
u2022 11_vaitm
u2022 11_vahdr
u2022 11_v_ssl
u2022 11_vasti
u2022 12_vcscl
u2022 selection of z-extractors
     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Financial Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 0FI_GL_4
u2022 NOTE: no further extractors are chosen for testing
u2022 tbd     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Master Data... Extraction and load, process chains     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Zxxx Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 Z_TRANSACTION_DATA
u2022 Zxxx
u2022 Zyyy     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: Plant Maintenance Extraction and load, process chains     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
BackEnd Test: PP Extraction and load, process chains     Test: load from Zxxx
"BackEnd Test: Purchasing Extraction and load, process chains     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
"BackEnd Test: APO Extraction and load, process chains
u2022 ZAPOxxx
u2022 ZAPOyyy
u2022 others can be tested, but were not included in de testset     Test:
- Extractor within process chain preferably otherwise mimic behavior (drop index, load, rebuild, aggragate etc)
- Delta extraction"
BackEnd Test: Regular Schedule - Production
BackEnd Test: Flat file upload     Test: 2 types from server and PC
BackEnd Test: Test Admin Workbench: creation of objects, change existing     Test the Admin Workbench: creation of infoobjects, change infoobject, create/change hierarchy, create cube,u2026
BackEnd Test: Test Bex: creation of queries (kf etc...); change existing     Creation of new query/ change query, create condition, calculated/restricted kf, variables,..
BackEnd Test: Issue handling
Development box issue fixing - on forehand     apply fixes based on issues BWQ
FrontEnd Test: Run Logistics Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Sales Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Supply Chain Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Financial Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Controling Reports     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Master Data and Special Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run PM Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run Purchasing Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Run APO Reports (log results in Reports tab)     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, make sure to execute each item of menu paths,validate no loss of functionality, report new functionality. Run few managed bookmarks
FrontEnd Test: Issue handling
FrontEnd Test: Make before image of reports - Production     Run reports; save of before image to compare once upgraded
FrontEnd Test: Run All Reports - Production     Run reports, execute various navigation steps, compare with 'before image' taken in prevous step
Test Security     Test security with various end-user roles/IDS other than BW developer (usually has * ALL)
Test Portal integration     Test portal with various end-user roles/IDS other than BW developer (usually has * ALL)
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:50 AM
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:50 AM
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:52 AM
Edited by: A. Nagelhout on Feb 12, 2010 10:52 AM

Thunderbolt Display has issue with weird washed-out colors after waking from sleep (after upgrade to Mavericks)

I've got a Thunderbolt Display that I use with my Macbook Air (mid 2012) - usually in clamshell mode.
When I let the computer go to sleep, and then wake it up by clicking the mouse, the monitor turns back on but the colors are washed out and purple looking.
The display goes back to normal when I unplug and replug it to my laptop.
I first noticed this problem after upgrading to Mavericks.
I made a video demonstrating the issue here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19179-MVpWA&feature=youtu.be
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Will

Same thing for me too. Late 2012 13" MBP Retina. I have to unplug the Thunderbolt cable and plug it back in.
This has only started for me in the last two days. The first two weeks of Mavericks was ok.
Update: I just got back from a trip. I was using the laptop separate from the Thunderbolt display. I hadn't restarted since I returned and connected the monitor. I've just rebooted, and put the computer to sleep. After resuming from sleep, the display is ok. Maybe try rebooting? I'll update if it continues.

Photoshop CS6 issue with shortcuts and my keyboard after upgrade from CS5

I recently upgraded from CS5 Extended to CS6 Extended on my Mac (Mavericks), but installed it in English instead of German this time. I transferred most of my presets just fine, but none of the keyboard shortcuts were working. All I got was an unequal sign for all shortcuts and even manually changing them didn't get them to work. I found a few discussions about this issue and ended up adding a German keyboard, as I am always on the Romaji setting of my Kotoeri (Japanese) keyboard. That seemed to solve the issue, but only if I change to the German keyboard before opening Photoshop. Shortcuts don't work in CS5 anymore either unless I do. Sometimes the shortcuts also stop working a while after I change back to the Kotoeri keyboard.
Now I would like to know if there is any way to get around this issue. Isn't there a way to get my shortcuts working again without constantly having to change keyboards? I much prefer the Kotoeri one since the icon for the German keyboard in my menu bar looks extremely obnoxious, in my opinion. It's mostly a cosmetic thing to me, but I would love to get everything back to the way it was before.
I'd much appreciate any advice or help.

I am having a similar problem. Just upgraded to Apple Yosemite and all none of my keyboard shortcuts are working in a clean install of Photoshop CS6. Every menu item has some form of the ≠ sign. I've trashed the .plist file, rebuilt permissions, etc. Even basic keyboard commands, like Command-N for NEW or Command-Q for QUIT do not work. In fact, many don't show up in the menu at all. I don't have this issue in InDesign CS6 or Illustrator CS6. Every once in awhile, maybe 1 time out of 20, menus and keyboard shortcuts work properly, but I can't find any pattern.

Issue to connect Apex 3.2 after reverting from 4.0

Hi,
I did by mistake (SID error) an upgrade from Apex 3.2. to Apex 4.0 on a DB 10g R1 which is not supported by 4.0. - I regret by the way that the APEX 4.0 installation doesn't make any check on the DB version before executing..
Well I followed the instructions to revert to 3.2 (clearly mentioned in the Installation manual of Apex 4.0) but now I can't log in on my Apex 3.2 environment receiving the following error (Admin & Dev environments)
ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
Unable to run page sentry in application 4500.
Return to application.
I also checked the DBMS registry and I couldn't find 'APEX' in it.. That might be the reason ..?
Given that I have some applications in my Apex environment, I want to avoid to launch the apexremov.sql procedure & I think that I miss a little procedure to solve my issue..
Any idea ? As to me if I can solve the way the APEX installation or removing procedure updates the dbms_registry it would be quite helpful
Thxs in advance for your help.
Brgds,
Yves
Edited by: ymoricea on Oct 15, 2010 1:35 AM
Edited by: ymoricea on Oct 15, 2010 1:37 AM

Hi,
I've solved my issue and I'd like to share what went wrong.
After further investigation, I found that "Invalid Credential" page was not
affected by any actions I took. So I tried to change XML DB HTTP port
number then everything went wrong.
It seemed that not until changing/restarting XML DB HTTP listener,
the page of "Invalid Credentials" was just a cache in the listener and
not an actual response from APEX.
Cheers.

10.7.3 issues with reconnecting to the Internet after waking from sleep mode?

My iMac worked great until this last update. Now it does not connect to the internet after I wake it from sleep mode. Any fixes?

I have a similar issue. My connection has been rock-solid since we went to Uverse, and now my computer loses the internet every 60-90 minutes or so. Driving me nuts. iPhone still on wireless router to internet, so problem seems to be computer.

BADI not found in QA System after transporting from DEV system

Hi,
I had created a new implementation ZHR_IN_CALC_PTX_AMT to the BADI: HR_IN_CALC_PTX_AMT in the DEV system with Request ID. But when i had transported that request, i am not able to find that BADI implementation in SE18 and SE19 respectively in Quality system.
Please suggest me on this, as this is urgent.
Regards.
Ravi

Hi,
Can you pls repeat the BADI Definition name? I couldn't find HR_IN_CALC_PTX_AMT in SAP versions 4.7, 5.0 and 6.0. Which is the version you use for development?
Regards,
Renjith Michael.

Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
Regards,
Salman

Salman,
What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
Regards,
Shivraj Singh

Analysis Authorization Issue 7.3

Hello Friends,
System BW 7.3, Currently there are 80 odd analysis authorization objects
We want to introduce a new info object (GL Account) to be authorization relevant, ( there are few objects in the system which are already authorization relevant in the system with proper analysis authorization objects and they are working fine)
Things done, made the GL Account object authorization relevant in RSA1, Created 2 analysis authorization objects with GL Account and TCT objects and one with hierarchy restrictions and one open access.
Added this object to the user in addition to its already existing authorization objects. Created authorization variable in BEx.
Some how the authorization is not picked up and it gives us all the values in the report. But if I add the GL Account info object to the existing analysis authorization objects then it works fine.
I do not want to change all the existing analysis authorization objects to add GL Account.
Your inputs are most welcome.
Thanks
Ed.

Gajesh- I have added the new analysis authorization object to the user in RSECadmin.
Subhendu- Problem statement: What are the steps involved in making a new info object(GL Account) authorization relevant. Authorizations are given at hierarchy level. Can we create a new analysis authorization with GL Account only or do we have to add it to every existing analysis authorization
I have done the following steps
1. Made the GL Account object authorization relevant in RSA1,
2. Created 2 new analysis authorization objects with GL Account ( with hierarchy restrictions) and TCT objects and one with GL Account open access.
3. Added this object ( which has restrictions) to the user in RSECADMIN, in addition to its already existing authorization objects.
4. Created authorization variable in BEx.
5. No existing analysis authorization objects have been changed.
When I test the report, It does not restrict based on the hierarchy that I have given, it gives open access.
But If I add GL Account with restrictions to the existing analysis authorization object, it works good.
Guess I am missing some thing here.
Do you need any other screen shots.
Thanks
Ed.

Analysis Authorization Issue

Hi:
I created an analysis authorization ZCO_CODE to trstrict it by a company code.
I added following objects in authorization with values.
0COMP_CODE = 1000
0TCAACTVT = 03
0TCAIFAREA = *
0TCAIPROV = *
0TCAVALID = *
Then I created a role Z:00:BW_REPORT, where I added following authorization objects S_RS_AUTH and restricted it by value ZCO_CODE. Then I assigned this role to a user test01.
When I execute a program RSEC_MIGRATION for this specific user, I do not see authorization object ZCO_CODE on 2nd step of this program. Any Idea Why? I think this object should show up as I want to migrate this specific object.
Help will be appreciated.

Hi Sachin:
Okay here is my issue.
I have a Reporting authorization Object created earlier which is ZCOCODE. I though I'll have to create a new Analysis authorization object e.g. ZCO_CODE and then restrict it with other chars. as mentioned in Marc Bernards presentation and then you have to migrate it.
In selection list I can see old Reporting authorization object. If I select it and use option "Enhance existing profile" then It will update profile and not role? right....
How can I see whether it has updated existing profile?????
Do I need to create new Analysis Auth. for Company code or I can use old Reporting authorization for company code?
For testing purpose, I created a test user and assigned all reporting roles but It will not show up in RSEC_MIGRATION step???

BI 7.0 Analysis Authorization issue: some reports displaying a blank page.

Hi All,
This is regarding BI 7.0 Analysis Authorization issue.
Overview:
we have restricted some queries at infoobject level.
Issue:
a. For some of the queries, we can see the selection screen but when we try to execute the query by clicking on the execute button (Queries WAD) we get a blank page, meaning nothing is displayed on the output (white/Blank screen).
b. When we execute the same query through RSRT, we get a message which says "Disconnecting from BW server..".
c. Let me explain further on this. Basically we are doing this in order to have limited access to Auditors at the client side. At the same time normal users should not get impacted due to this, hence we created two roles. One for normal users and other for Auditors.
d. Now the thing is that we execute the same report with normal user ID's the report executes properly and displays the output. it does not show the blank page.
e. But when we execute the same report with Auditors ID then we get a blank page.
Any idea why this is so?

Hi Neha,
I tried the below also,
GL Acnt
I EQ 0000134010
I EQ :
but still it didn't work.
No Infoobject is missing in Authorization Object.
For your point, "rsecadmin - > analysis -> execute as -> check for the desired user & analyze the log" it didnu2019t allow me to analyze, since as soon as click on execute button a pop-up comes up saying "Disconnecting from the BW server..."
As mentioned earlier also it is giving me the below message,
""I>> Row: 103 Inc: AUTHORITY_02 Prog: CL_RSR_RRK0_AUTHORIZATION RS_EXCEPTION 301CL_RSR_RRK0_AUTHORIZATION AUTHORITY_02"
Kindly suggest, since this is a show-stopper for us!
Thanks,
Ishdeep Kohli.

Analysis Authorization and relates issue

Hello all,
I am in the midst of designing authorizations using RSECADMIN transaction.
We have a set of 50 different queries.
In our cube, there are 5 different characteristics, which are authorization relevent.
So, in RSECADMIN, i have created one analysis auth role, included all special and authorization relevent characteristics and maintained the appropriate values.
But when i execute the queries,the desired output is not coming.
- Do i need to create authorization varaibles and included in all my queries ?
- Without including the auth.variabes in queries, is there any other way to restrict the users ?
I though, by assigning the parameters in RSECADMIN, the query will automatically filter the data.
Can you pls help ?
We are on SP19.

Hi,
First of all, The query is always based on a InfoCube. Now, you have 50 different Queries which is based on this InfoCube if I am not wrong as you are not getting any authorization error.
For a query to run, the user should have access to 1. Query, 2. Infocube and 3. Data(All Auth Relevant + 4 Special Objects)
Authorization relevant objects are for an InfoCube which means that these objects are important or key fields for the infocube.
You say that in your case, you have 5 Auth relevant objects which means they are important. But please note that there are more infoObjects in that InfoCube.
Now, when you go to the query design, you can restrict on any object in the InfoCube but it makes more sense that you do it on one of those authorization relevant objects as you have to specify that in the Analysis Authorization where the system can pick up the data easily and give the output.
Again, on the query design, if you have designed the query with processing type "Authorization", then it would automatically pick up (What you mentioned as automatic filtering) the value from the Analysis Authorization which is contained in the user's role for that query which otherwise gives a wide variety of options to chose from where the user has to choose the correct one.
To get the desired output, all the correct variables should be included in the query and user should have access to all the three mentioned above.
May be this gives a clear picture.
Regards,
Prasanna
Edited by: Prasanna Nagaraja on Sep 11, 2009 11:40 PM

Issues with Analysis Authorization on Infoset

Hi all
We are facing an issue with Analysis Authorization on Infoset, it doesnt seem to throw authorization error when we access a record that is outside the authorization. We tried to use the same authorization set up from the same user we try to access the a record that is outside the authorization it behaves correctly.
Here is my setup
0CRM_MKTELM__0CRMCAMPTYP = ZA11
0TCAACTVT = *
0TCAIPROV = *
0TCAVALID = *
When I tried to access ZA12 it should throw an authorization error but for infoset it doesnt seem to work. Is there anything that we should take note for Infoset?

Hi Chee,
I am getting similar issue.
I believe navigational attribute was already a authorization relevant in your case.
What and where did you set it as authorization relevant to make it work on infosets.
Regards,
Ramz

Issues with Analysis Authorization checks in APO

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue with Analysis authorization checks in APO.
We have setup user access based on Management Entity (Analysis authorization - AGMMGTENT and 0TCAACTVT) and core APO authorizations (based on the work profile - e.g: Demand Planner).
Scenario: Consider User A has access to India and Australia Management Entities with 0TCAACTVT - *
This user also has display access to all management Entities (AGMMGTENT - * and 0TCAACTVT - 03). This scenario works very well in Quality where the RSECADMIN trace shows check on both Characteristics. However in Production the RSECADMIN trace shows up only against AGMMGTENT (*) and by default takes 0TCAACTVT as (*).
In Quality the Characteristics that get checked are as below : and it works as expected. Display access for Management Entities that are supposed to be displayed only and change access to only the Management Entities that it should.
However the Trace for Production shows the following : As a result it is allowing the user to change access to all management Entities. Which is not desirable..
Resultant trace results are as below: This should not happen..
I have compared all Analysis Authorizations and it is same across both Instances. The Demand planner access is consistent too..
Will it be possible for you to advise on what could I be missing.

Hi All,
If it helps, in Quality: the Authorization checks are listed as: Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 1
while in Production it checks Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 1 in one place, however where it fails - the check happens as Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 0.
Is there a way we can change this to SUBNR 1. Is there any table entry that I can look at to check if the Authorization check is functioning incorrectly..
Please advise.. Thanks..
Regards,
Prakash

Issue w RSCUSTV23 Analysis Authorization System after upg from BW3.5 to BI7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for