Issue while implementing MUDE

Hi
While we are implementing the MUDE utility we ar unable to see few schemas and tables .
Please, help in resolving this issue.
Thanks.

Hi Sam,
Set a break on SCWB_CINST_READ function, in one of the selects cwbcihead table (Header date for correction instructions), you can see will that not find the correction statement.
In case the statement is a note from a previous version,it´s not possible to insert the statement in the table manually, because for some reason had an inconsistency and the statement was not inserted in the table.
Best regards,
Luiz Ferreira

Similar Messages

  • Issue while implementing OSS note

    Hi Experts,
    While Implementing the note 100690 in sap , I am facing the following issue.
    The traffic signal light is red and the message text shows as follows:
    Object REPS ZKOGLMNG doesn't exist, create it
    Object REPS ZKOMENGE doesn't exist, create it
    Object REPS ZKORWEM2 doesn't exist, create it
    Object REPS ZKORWEM3 doesn't exist, create it
    Object REPS ZKORWEM4 doesn't exist, create it
    Could you guys help me out in resolving this issue ASAP .
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Sandy

    Hi Juan ,
    Thanks for the mail,
    I had a small doubt over here,
    can I follow this procedure:
    1). I will ask my ABAP team to create those mentioned objects manually.
    2). Then I will implement the SNOTE , so that the corrections will  be inserted into those objects.
    I do understand your point earlier that to manually apply the corrections (In this case both step1 & 2 will be done by ABAPer's).
    Please let me know if above procedure works .
    Thanks&Regards
    Sandeep

  • How to resolve Issues while implement gateway security by using reginfo,secinfo?

    Hi,
    I want to implement gateway security using  gw/reg_info,  gw/sec_info,  gw/reg_no_conn_info.
    so far I have created reginfo and secinfo files to allow all internal traffic and I kept gw/reg_no_conn_info=11, gw/acl_mode=1
    reginfo
    ======
    #VERSION=2
    P TP=*,HOST=local
    P TP=*,HOST=internal
    P TP=*,HOST=*.abc.com
    with the above setting I believe all the programs with in sap systems(including app servers), also system from domain abc.com can register programs with out having any issues.
    secinfo:
    ======
    #VERSION=2
    P TP=* USER=* USER-HOST=local HOST=local
    P TP=* USER=* USER-HOST=internal HOST=internal
    similarly  as per secinfo content I believe that all the internal traffic can go with out any issue with in sap system.
    beside that I have activated gateway logging to find the rejecting connections if any.
    I have following questions:
    ===================
    1)As the reginfo,secinfo files maintained can I remove gw/acl_mode=1 parameter ?
    2)if I want to add a specific programs to register from 3rd party system, suppose a program called "zram" from system "172.198.10.1" where I suppose to add it. Do I need to add that IP to secinfo along with reginfo?
    3)when I set parameter gw/reg_no_conn_info=11 when convert to binary it equals to 00001011
    what exactly this means from the following definitions from note 1444282
    1 1298433 Bypassing security in reginfo & secinfo
    2 1434 117 Bypassing sec_info without reg_info
    4 1465129 CANCEL registered programs
    8 1473017 Uppercase/lowercase in the files reg_info and sec_info
    will that means 8+2+1 means satisfying the above 3 lines except condition 4 ?
    4) I enabled  gateway logging, how could I catch rejecting connections from third party systems?
    5)From simulation mode I got to know that It will satisfy reginfo,secinfo restrictions and it will allow all other traffic.so what is the added advantage with this when activate?
    6)is there any sap native tools which help while preparing reginfo, secinfo files?
    Regards,
    Koteswararao.Davuluri(Koti).

    Hi,
    Here is answers for questions 4 and 5.
    4) I enabled  gateway logging, how could I catch rejecting connections from third party systems?
    SMGW->Goto->Expert functions->logging
    In the above path if you select security->(under that)->Rejected access only
    when you select that it should show you the connections getting rejected.
    5)For simulation mode you have 2 options. you can activate directly from the above path.Other option  if you maintain gw/sim_mode = 1  that will make the permanent simulation mode. But once after all the entries set in reginfo you have to disable simulation mode. with secinfo you will not have much problems.
    After doing steps 4, 5 you can see rejected entries in Gateway log.

  • BAM Portal issue while implementing BAM tutorial 4

    Hello All,
    I am trying to implement BAM tutorial. I have deployed everything as specified in the tutorial, except for RTA. I am not using RTA.
    When I checked the BAM Portal I can see views and activities over there. But not all fields are having values in it.
    Do anyone have any idea why few fields are blank over here?
    Thanks, Girish R. Patil.

    The reason for fields in a BAM View being empty is because
    They are not assigned any value - Values in BAM are assigned either through TPE mapping OR through BAM API in the orchestration.
    If a BAM Activity is populated using a mixture of BAM API & TPE then it is possible that there are different fields being used for Activity ID and as a result TPE is mapping the same activity using Message ID while the orchestration is using the Instance
    Id to create the activity. In such a scenario TWO activities are being created.
    In your case, it is possible that you've missed some steps in the tutorial where after deploying the Activity (through bm.exe) there may have been instructions on TPE and mapping of the message instance data into the BAM Activity.
    Regards.

  • Issues while implementing Graceful switchover and switchback

    Hi Guru's,
    I had a DR Drill between one of my 10.2.0.4 ( standard edition) Primary database server and it's manaual standby dr server. Where only reports were going to be generated.
    With reference to http://www.pafumi.net/Graceful_Failover_Failback.html , I have implemented Graceful Switchover and Switchback feature for this activity.
    1. Disabled the jobs
    a) where my new archives are being copied on to dr server
    b) manual archive apply for standby
    2. I did a clean shutdown both (Primary and manual dr)
    3. Verified the sequence# on both ( it was same)
    4. Copied Control file ,Redolog files from Primary to Standby
    5. Replaced and renamed standby control file with primary one
    6. STARTUP MOUNT – standby database
    7. Renamed Datafiles and Redo logfiles at MOUNT state ( As redo log were already copied to the specified location after renaming)
    8. Verified all the datafiles and redo log files are renamed properly.
    9. Perform RECOVER DATBASE; -- Where I have received following error:
    Errors in file e:\vision\udump\orcl_ora_5676.trc:
    ORA-00314: log 1 of thread 1, expected sequence# 29756 doesn't match 27878
    ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: 'E:\PROD\REDOLOG2A.LOG'
    ORA-00314: log 1 of thread 1, expected sequence# 29756 doesn't match 27878
    ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: 'E:\PROD\REDOLOG2.LOG'However ; I have tried to perform the same steps with fresh copy ( cold backup of Primary) of redo log files ,but end up with same message, this time it was for redo log group 1.
    I have also Startup the primary and performed some log switches and tried to redo the entire activity. But no success.
    Finally i have taken cold backup of manual standby (data+control) in a folder.
    Then i had to activate the standby database since the business user was waiting for the running reports .
    As soon as the testing (i.e. generating reports worked fine , we performed the revertback where i have simply restored the cold backup of standby.
    Started my Primary , and enabled the jobs that i disabled in step 1.
    Please suggest me as to why this failure has happened ? As per the error information in Control file and Redo log did not matched :-( but why ??
    Any advice / observation will be appreciated.
    Regards

    For dataguard/standby related post create thread in this link
    Data Guard
    --neeraj                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Issues while creating implementation for BADI  "ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST"

    Hi Group,
    I have issues while creating implementation for  BADI "ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST".
    I tried to create implementation for the above mentioned BADI but, I was getting an error like this:
    "Interface implementation IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST does not exist".
    I want to implement this BADI and so, ideas/views at the earliest will be appreciated.
    Please let me know how to overcome this error.
    Thanks,
    Vishnu.

    Hi,
    Have you activated the class which is implementing the interface? (in transaction SE19 you should see class name)
    Best regards,
    Wojciech

  • Issue while starting AdminSerever using wlst commands

    Hi, I am facing issue while trying to start the AdminServer and Managed Server via nodemanager using wlst commands. I have installelled WebLogic 11g on windows 2008 R2. Mentioned below are the steps that I followed:
    1) In Nodemanager.properties files I set following parameters to true. I did this, so that nodemanager can start the server in case of crash.
    CrashRecoveryEnabled=true
    StartScriptEnabled=true
    2) started nodemanager and then started AdminServer from the command prompt as follows:
    nmConnect('weblogic','password','10.23.226.58','5556','IMDomain','E:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\IMDomain','ssl')
    nmStart('AdminServer')
    I dont see any errors but it seems the AdminServer do Not start properly as in the cmd window I don't see any 'started successfully' message - the message remains as *"Starting AdminServer..."*
    However in the adminServer logs I see that the status is Running (refer logs at the end) and I can also see it as Running in weblogic console.
    I really didnt care if its not giving a success message in cmd window but the problem occurs when I start the managedServer. After starting the managed server in about 10 minutes, there is a stuck thread. (I guess it is 10 mins because Stuck Thread MaxTime value is 600).
    If I set StartScriptEnabled=false, and start by directly running the startweblogic.cmd then it works fine.
    I am struggling with this for last 1 week, appreciate any help.
    LOGS.......
    Starting WLS with line:
    E:\PROGRA~1\Java\JDK16~1.0_2\bin\java -client -Xms256m -Xmx1024m -XX:CompileThreshold=8000 -XX:PermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Dweblogic.Name=AdminServer -Djava.security.policy=E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\weblogic.policy -Djavax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory=weblogic.xml.stax.XMLStreamInputFactory -Dweblogic.security.SSL.nojce=true -Xverify:none -da -Dplatform.home=E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3 -Dwls.home=E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server -Dwli.home=E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\integration -Dweblogic.home=E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server -Dweblogic.management.discover=true -Dwlw.iterativeDev=false -Dwlw.testConsole=false -Dwlw.logErrorsToConsole=false -Dweblogic.ext.dirs=E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\patch_wls1035\profiles\default\sysext_manifest_classpath;E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\patch_ocp360\profiles\default\sysext_manifest_classpath weblogic.Server
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:30 PM CDT> <Info> <Security> <BEA-090905> <Disabling CryptoJ JCE Provider self-integrity check for better startup performance. To enable this check, specify -Dweblogic.security.allowCryptoJDefaultJCEVerification=true>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:30 PM CDT> <Info> <Security> <BEA-090906> <Changing the default Random Number Generator in RSA CryptoJ from ECDRBG to FIPS186PRNG. To disable this change, specify -Dweblogic.security.allowCryptoJDefaultPRNG=true>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:30 PM CDT> <Info> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000377> <Starting WebLogic Server with Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Version 20.2-b06 from Sun Microsystems Inc.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:31 PM CDT> <Info> <Management> <BEA-141107> <Version: WebLogic Server 10.3.5.0 Fri Apr 1 20:20:06 PDT 2011 1398638 >
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:32 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to STARTING>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:32 PM CDT> <Info> <WorkManager> <BEA-002900> <Initializing self-tuning thread pool>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:32 PM CDT> <Notice> <Log Management> <BEA-170019> <The server log file E:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\IMDomain\servers\AdminServer\logs\AdminServer.log is opened. All server side log events will be written to this file.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:36 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090082> <Security initializing using security realm myrealm.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:37 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to STANDBY>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:37 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to STARTING>
    Mar 14, 2012 3:16:39 PM com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener contextInitialized
    INFO: Initializing Sun's JavaServer Faces implementation (1.2_03-b04-FCS) for context '/console'
    Mar 14, 2012 3:16:39 PM com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener contextInitialized
    INFO: Completed initializing Sun's JavaServer Faces implementation (1.2_03-b04-FCS) for context '/console'
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <Log Management> <BEA-170027> <The Server has established connection with the Domain level Diagnostic Service successfully.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to ADMIN>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to RESUMING>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default" is now listening on 10.227.211.13:8001 for protocols iiop, t3, ldap, snmp, http.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000329> <Started WebLogic Admin Server "AdminServer" for domain "IMDomain" running in Production Mode>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to RUNNING>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:16:40 PM CDT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000360> <Server started in RUNNING mode>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090171> <Loading the identity certificate and private key stored under the alias DemoIdentity from the jks keystore file E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\DemoIdentity.jks.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file E:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\DemoTrust.jks.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file E:\PROGRA~1\Java\JDK16~1.0_2\jre\lib\security\cacerts.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Alert> <Security> <BEA-090152> <Demo trusted CA certificate is being used in production mode: [
    Version: V3
    Subject: CN=CACERT, OU=FOR TESTING ONLY, O=MyOrganization, L=MyTown, ST=MyState, C=US
    Signature Algorithm: MD5withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.4
    Key: Sun RSA public key, 512 bits
    modulus: 9550192877869244258838480703390456015046425375252278279190673063544122510925482179963329236052146047356415957587628011282484772458983977898996276815440753
    public exponent: 65537
    Validity: [From: Thu Mar 21 14:12:27 CST 2002,
                   To: Tue Mar 22 15:12:27 CDT 2022]
    Issuer: CN=CACERT, OU=FOR TESTING ONLY, O=MyOrganization, L=MyTown, ST=MyState, C=US
    SerialNumber: [    33f10648 fcde0deb 4199921f d64537f4]
    Certificate Extensions: 1
    [1]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true
    KeyUsage [
    Key_CertSign
    Algorithm: [MD5withRSA]
    Signature:
    0000: 9D 26 4C 29 C8 91 C3 A7 06 C3 24 6F AE B4 F8 82 .&L)......$o....
    0010: 80 4D AA CB 7C 79 46 84 81 C4 66 95 F4 1E D8 C4 .M...yF...f.....
    0020: E9 B7 D9 7C E2 23 33 A4 B7 21 E0 AA 54 2B 4A FF .....#3..!..T+J.
    0030: CB 21 20 88 81 21 DB AC 90 54 D8 7D 79 63 23 3C .! ..!...T..yc#<
    ] The system is vulnerable to security attacks, since it trusts certificates signed by the demo trusted CA.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=Entrust Root Certification Authority - G2,OU=(c) 2009 Entrust\, Inc. - for authorized use only,OU=See www.entrust.net/legal-terms,O=Entrust\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=thawte Primary Root CA - G3,OU=(c) 2008 thawte\, Inc. - For authorized use only,OU=Certification Services Division,O=thawte\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 3,OU=T-Systems Trust Center,O=T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH,C=DE". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 2,OU=T-Systems Trust Center,O=T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH,C=DE". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=GlobalSign,O=GlobalSign,OU=GlobalSign Root CA - R3". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "OU=Security Communication RootCA2,O=SECOM Trust Systems CO.\,LTD.,C=JP". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority,OU=(c) 2008 VeriSign\, Inc. - For authorized use only,OU=VeriSign Trust Network,O=VeriSign\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=KEYNECTIS ROOT CA,OU=ROOT,O=KEYNECTIS,C=FR". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 14, 2012 3:20:53 PM CDT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G3,OU=(c) 2008 GeoTrust Inc. - For authorized use only,O=GeoTrust Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
    <Mar 15, 2012 11:41:41 AM CDT> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000337> <[STUCK] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' has been busy for "650" seconds working on the request "weblogic.kernel.WorkManagerWrapper$1@68a3f7ed", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "600" seconds. Stack trace:
    java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
    java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
    weblogic.utils.io.ChunkedInputStream.read(ChunkedInputStream.java:159)
    java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85)
    com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readFragment(Unknown Source)
    com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readRecord(Unknown Source)
    com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.read(Unknown Source)
    com.certicom.io.InputSSLIOStreamWrapper.read(Unknown Source)
    sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:264)
    sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:306)
    sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:158)
    java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:167)
    java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:136)
    java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:299)
    java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:362)
    weblogic.nodemanager.client.NMServerClient.checkResponse(NMServerClient.java:289)
    weblogic.nodemanager.client.NMServerClient.checkResponse(NMServerClient.java:314)
    weblogic.nodemanager.client.NMServerClient.start(NMServerClient.java:102)
    weblogic.nodemanager.mbean.StartRequest.start(StartRequest.java:75)
    weblogic.nodemanager.mbean.StartRequest.execute(StartRequest.java:47)
    weblogic.kernel.WorkManagerWrapper$1.run(WorkManagerWrapper.java:63)
    weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
    >
    <Mar 15, 2012 11:42:41 AM CDT> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000337> <[STUCK] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' has been busy for "710" seconds working on the request "weblogic.kernel.WorkManagerWrapper$1@68a3f7ed", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "600" seconds. Stack trace:
    java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
    java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
    weblogic.utils.io.ChunkedInputStream.read(ChunkedInputStream.java:159)
    java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85)
    com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readFragment(Unknown Source)
    com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readRecord(Unknown Source)
    com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.read(Unknown Source)
    com.certicom.io.InputSSLIOStreamWrapper.read(Unknown Source)
    sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:264)
    sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:306)
    sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:158)
    java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:167)
    java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:136)
    java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:299)
    java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:362)
    weblogic.nodemanager.client.NMServerClient.checkResponse(NMServerClient.java:289)
    weblogic.nodemanager.client.NMServerClient.checkResponse(NMServerClient.java:314)
    weblogic.nodemanager.client.NMServerClient.start(NMServerClient.java:102)
    weblogic.nodemanager.mbean.StartRequest.start(StartRequest.java:75)
    weblogic.nodemanager.mbean.StartRequest.execute(StartRequest.java:47)
    weblogic.kernel.WorkManagerWrapper$1.run(WorkManagerWrapper.java:63)
    weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
    weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
    >

    Hi chamila,
        I never tried the example. Exception is not clear. Could you please post more stack trace from log files.
    Thanks,
    Sham

  • Problem while implementing  OSS note 1077403

    Hi,
    I am trying to implement a OSS note ( 1077403) using SNOTE transaction. When I download the note, the status of this note is u201CCan be implementedu201D. It creates few standard programs which are utility programs related to Unicode conversion. While  implementing this note, I am facing the issue "Objects can only be created in SAP package" and some of the objects in the note are not created. The note status becomes u2018Incompletely Implementedu2019.
    Can you please suggest what could be the issue?

    HI,
    For more efficence  direct link to note Note 1077403 - Cluster table check using SDBI_CLUSTER_CHECK
    Have you a basis release version >= 6.20 ?
    you can use transaction SNOTE to implement the version for Basis Release 6.20 and higher.
    Rgds
    Edited by: stéphane mouraux on Mar 1, 2010 6:31 PM

  • Dump "GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED" while implementing Remodeling

    Hello Everyone,
    i am trying to add an infoobject 0calweek with constant value using remodeling. while implementing this scenario i encountered with a short dump "GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED" could anybody suggest any fix to this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ajay.D

    thanks

  • SOlman_setup issue at implement SAP Note Step

    Hi Friends,
    While i am performing the solman_setup (system preparation) facing once issue at Implement SAP Note step.
    In this step while i am performing  the post processing step (3rd step) giving the red signal The system only partially implemented the manual activities for note 1856234.
    And i followed the note 1856234 as per the note i ran the report AI_CRM_ANALYZE_IBASE_SORTF and i got the error messages.
    The Ibase component 000000000000003598 has deviceid: SID 00XXXXXXX
    Sort string is needed!
    Comp. with same device id:
    Replace Sort string with (from LMDB):
    The Ibase component 000000000000003272 has deviceid: SID 00XXXXXXX Etc.
    Sort string is needed!
    Comp. with same device id:
    Replace Sort string with (from LMDB):
    And as per the note
    when i am executing IB_GEN i am getting below errors.
    Object not found - will be created.
    No changes made; Saving not allowed
    Failed to save object %   1 (Object family 7001).
    Kindly suggest on this.
    Thank you,
    Chowdary.

    Please refer to SAP Notes 1694004 - Dealing with duplicate technical system names (SIDs) and 1747926 - Dealing with duplicate technical system names (old SLD)

  • Issue while apply support pack SAP_BASIS SAPKB70013 -18

    Hi Gurus,
    We have issue while apply support pack to Development system, we have implemented SAPKB70012 pack first and then we have implemented SPAU and saved in Trasport request  . while applying other patch SAPKB70013 -18 in one go system asked us to release SPAU  transport and then we released that transport after that same transport with auotomatic job it has got implemneted to Quality system and then after that we got below error in quality system :-
    The function module "EXTENDED_AUTH_CHECK_FOR_REPS" is called, but
    cannot be found in its function group.
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPLS38E" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    Please suggest now both system is not working .
    Regards,
    Jeetendra

    Also you can check object modifications in transaction SE03 looking for request that touched object SAPLS38E.
    Could you please share the syntax error message ?
    Best regards

  • I'm facing performance issue while accessing the PLAF Table

    Dar all,
    I'm facing performance issue while accessing the PLAF Table.
    The START-OF-SELECTION of the report starts with the following select query.
        SELECT plnum  pwwrk matnr gsmng psttr FROM plaf
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_tab
        WHERE matnr IN s_matnr
          AND pwwrk = p_pwwrk
          AND psttr IN s_psttr
          AND auffx = 'X'
          AND paart = 'LA' .
    While executing the report in the Quality system it does not face any performance issue...
    When it comes to Production System the above said select query itself it is taking 15 - 20 minutes time to move further.
    Kindly help me to over come this problem...
    Regards,
    Jessi

    Hi,
    "Just implement its primary Key
    WHERE PLNUM BETWEEN '0000000001' AND '9999999999' " By this you are implementing the Primary Key
    This statement has nothing to do with performance, because system is not able to use primary key or uses every row.
    Jessica, your query uses secondary index created by SAP:
    1     (Material, plant) which uses fields MANDT MATNR and PLWRK.
    but it is not suitable in your case.
    You can consider adding new one, which would containt all fields: MANDT, MATNR, PWWRK, PSTTR AUFFX PAART
    or - but it depends on number of rows meeting and not meeting (auffx = 'X' AND paart = 'LA' ) condition.
    It could speed the performance, if you would create secondary index based on fields MANDT, MATNR, PWWRK, PSTTR
    and do like Ramchander suggested: remove AUFFX and PAART from index and where section, and remove these unwanted rows
    after the query using DELETE statement.
    Regards,
    Przemysław
    Please check how many rows in production system

  • Logical systems while implementing charm in solution manager

    Hello Everybody,
    I just wanted to know how many logical systems we need while implementing charm in solution manager 7.0. I have 3 clients in development , 3 clients in Quality and 1 client in production.
    Thank you,
    vikram.

    Hi Vikram,
    Yes, i1n ChaRM we always work with logical systems, I mean clients.
    The standard is:
    DEV -> QAS -> PRD
    However, you can also use:
    - Minimum
    DEV -> PRD
    - Target groups
    DEV -> QAS -> PRD
             - > TST
    DEV -> QA1 -> QA2 -> PRD
    DEV -> QA1 -> PR1
             -> QA2 -> PR2
    There are a lot of combination possible.
    BR
    Fernando

  • Issue in implementing Dynamic participant chooser process Step

    I am facing issue in implementing Participant chooser process Step.
    I want to create dynamic Participant chooser process Step, I have implemented 'ParticipantStepChooser' class and overwrote 'getParticipant' method. But this process did not appear in Dynamic participant chooser dropdown in CQ5.6 environment.
    I deployed same code in CQ5.5 and process appeared in Dynamic participant chooser dropdown.
    This is the sample code which I have used:
    @Component(immediate = true, metatype = true, label = "DMP Config Service123")
    @Service
    @Properties({
            @Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_DESCRIPTION, value = "A sample implementation of a dynamic participant chooser.", propertyPrivate=true),
            @Property(name = Constants.SERVICE_VENDOR, value = "Adobe", propertyPrivate=true),
            @Property(name = ParticipantStepChooser.SERVICE_PROPERTY_LABEL, value = "******** Hello ********", propertyPrivate=true),
            @Property(name = "immediate" , value = "true", propertyPrivate=true)
    public class MyDynamicParticipant implements ParticipantStepChooser {
        private static final String TYPE_JCR_PATH = "JCR_PATH";
        @Activate
    void activate(ComponentContext context) {
      LoggerUtil.infoLog(this.getClass(), " ");
        public String getParticipant(WorkItem workItem, WorkflowSession workflowSession, MetaDataMap args) throws WorkflowException {
      LoggerUtil.infoLog(this.getClass(), "inside getParticipant method{} ");
            WorkflowData workflowData = workItem.getWorkflowData();
            if (workflowData.getPayloadType().equals(TYPE_JCR_PATH)) {
    String path = workflowData.getPayload().toString();
    String pathFromArgument = args.get("PROCESS_ARGS", String.class);
    if (pathFromArgument != null && path.startsWith(pathFromArgument)) {
    return "admin";
            return "administrators";

    Make sure to change your imports in 5.6 to use granite api. Please change from [1] to [2].
    [1]
    import com.day.cq.workflow.WorkflowException;
    import com.day.cq.workflow.WorkflowSession;
    import com.day.cq.workflow.exec.ParticipantStepChooser;
    import com.day.cq.workflow.exec.WorkItem;
    import com.day.cq.workflow.exec.WorkflowData;
    import com.day.cq.workflow.metadata.MetaDataMap;
    [2]
    import com.adobe.granite.workflow.WorkflowException;
    import com.adobe.granite.workflow.WorkflowSession;
    import com.adobe.granite.workflow.exec.ParticipantStepChooser;
    import com.adobe.granite.workflow.exec.WorkItem;
    import com.adobe.granite.workflow.metadata.MetaDataMap;

  • Issue while creating repair order via IW52

    Hi All,
             I am facing an issue while creating a repair order from Service Notification.
    In IW52 for service Notification , we have option of Create repair order in Action box of service notification, when i am clicking that i need to enter the sales order type.. when i am selecting standard order type KD01 or any other it is saying that
    1)Order type KD01 does not have the sales doc. identifier "repair"
    Message no. QM127
    Diagnosis
    You entered an order type that is not assigned to the sales document identifier "F" or "G" = repair order.
    Procedure
    Enter an order type that has the sales document identifier "F" or "G".
    Where can we see sales document identifier in config ?
    2. I would like know is there any setting where we can give default sales order type to service notification type ..
    regards
    giri

    Dear,
            Thanks for your inputs. It will be great help if you can let me know the below :
    1) Diff between Repair order, spare parts order..
    2)I happened to create a service order from a sales order following IDES Model for CS -4.6C / the service order type created is SM01 is created and my sales order type is OR .. now my question is there any setting where we assign Service order type to sales order type ???
    Note :- In OIOL Tcode for SM01 Order type i have IRC Sales order document type linked ..
    regards
    giri

Maybe you are looking for