Issue while posting message to queue

Hi ,
I am getting following exception while posting message into queue.For every new build I am getting this exception and after 2 or 3 times of restart of corresponding OBPM related weblogic server,Issue is getting resolved
A component failed while executing activity '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/ComponentExecution[PreProcessor]' (BP-method preProcessor) over instance '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/15141/0'.
Details:
The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
fuego.lang.ComponentExecutionException: The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1091)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.runCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1277)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.runCil(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:126)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.execute(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:84)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.executeActivity(MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.java:57)
     at fuego.server.execution.ImmediateActivity.execute(ImmediateActivity.java:42)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startNestedTransaction(TransactionAction.java:527)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:548)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(DefaultEngineExecution.java:62)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(EngineExecution.java:42)
     at fuego.server.execution.ToDoItem.executeAutomaticWork(ToDoItem.java:251)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean$1.execute(ItemExecutionBean.java:217)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startBaseTransaction(TransactionAction.java:470)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:551)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeImmediate(EngineExecution.java:66)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.processMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:203)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.onMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:115)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:466)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:371)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:327)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4123)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4013)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:4541)
     at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:464)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
Caused by: fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
at fuego.connector.ConnectorException.exceptionOnGetResource(ConnectorException.java:95)
     at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:324)
     at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:298)
     at fuego.connector.JMSHelper.getSession(JMSHelper.java:75)
     at fuegoblock.msg.DynamicJMS.sendMessage(DynamicJMS.java:145)
     at xobject.Utility.JMSService.writeToAppQueue(JMSService.xcdl:11)
     at xobject.Utility.Notification.sendAuditNotification(Notification.xcdl:19)
     at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl:20)
     at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1082)
     ... 31 more
Please help how can I resolve this issue
Thanks
Sailendra

I am also getting the same issue. Sailendra, did you resolve the issue?
If not could anyone help us to resolve this issue.
I am using Tibco JMS for queue and I have set 'ConnectionFactory' as Connection Factory Lookup Name value in the external resourse.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramanan

Similar Messages

Facing Intermittent Error while posting Messages to Queue

HI ,
I am working on a WLI Project which involves the Message Queue, Topic, Message Brokers, JMS Event Generators.
To test the Application,
I have a test page from where I pump in the Messages to the Channel. The messages are being read and the JPD that has subscribed to the Message Broker is getting invoked and is able to Post a response Message to a Queue which is created.
The Message is getting Posted to the Queue properly For some time until I run a single Test at a time
Once I try to do simultaneous test for the Test page I see that the Message is not getting posted to the Queue. And I get a error Message on the Server Console as:
<Error> <WLW> <000000> <Received message without correlationID. MessageID=ID:P<106224.1170871006171.0>>
I am not getting any kind of solution in any forum on how to fix this Issue. and also not sure where exactly is it going wrong.
I am using Weblogic 8.1 SP4 on Windows. Application is deployed on Integration Domain.
Waiting for some solution.
Thanks in Advance!!

Thanks Denis for your Reply.
I was looking in the Bea Docs and it states that we need to set the CorrelationID to the conversationID of the listening Service. So I am not getting how to get the ConversationID of another Service(listening Service) which is trying to read this message from the Queue.
I also tried to set the correlationID to conversationID of the same JPD from which I am sending the message to the Queue. But still I see the same error message .
Also the conversationID for the JPD is null.
I am trying to do as below:
Map jmsHeaders = new HashMap();
String cid=null;
cid = context.getService().getConversationID();
jmsHeaders.put("JMSCorrelationID", cid);
QueueCtrl.setHeaders(jmsHeaders);
QueueCtrl.sendTextMessage(this.mpiMessageDoc);
When I run multiple instance of the JPD which r trying to post to the same Queue simultaneously I get the same error:
<Error> <WLW> <000000> <Received message without correlationID. MessageID=ID:P<106224.1170871006171.0>>
Can any body comment on this Issue?
Thanks in Advance

Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin

Document splitting issue while posting MIRO transaction

Hello All
I have a piculiar related to document splitting while posting MIRO entry and this issue started after defaulting the profit center
to the tax gl.
The scenario is like this
While posting a vendor invoice document where there is a difference in the invoice value and stock is allready consumedn
hence system will try to post the difference to the material difference account.
The following is the asccounting entries
01 vendor a/c cr   1000
02 gr/ir a/c dr         800       pc from po document
03 tax g/l                 180       default pc
04 inventory diff       20
the error message
system is not able to determine the profit center at line item 04 and message is
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled
The document splitting settings are all standards related to vendor invoice ..................
One important point to be noted here is that this issue is come after defaulting the profit center at tax gl.
But we cannot remove those default pc also.
Can be their any solution on this
Kindly suggest
Thanks

Hi
In addition to my previous mail i want to add that
i tried to add even expense item category to splitting rule of business transaction and transaction variant.
Even then it doers not work.
other then is as per standard document splitting rule the expense item category is not included in invoice verication buisness transaction.
Thanks
alok

Dummy Profit center issue while posting the transaction in FB60

Dear SAP friends,
We have implemented ECC6.0 version,
I have the below issue:
I am posting the document in FB60 transaction: after simulating the document system is throwing the error "Profit center 9937/FIREPRODMY does not exist for 14.08.2009"
Message no. KM700
Document spilitting active at Business area level..
In 0KE5( maintain controlling area settings) I have not given the Dummy profit center.
Eventhough it is asking for Dummy profit center while posting, Please let me know apart from the 0Ke5 settings do i need to remove the dummy profit center anywhere in the Config.
I have not maintained any settings in FAGL3KEH, 3KEH and OKB9.
No sunstitutions are active in the system.
Please let me know from where i need to remove the dummy profit center.
My client going live on 17th Aug 2009.
Regards,
Anand

Hi,
Check the validity period of the Profit Center 9937/FIREPRODMY. The valid from period should have the date same or earlier than 14.08.2009
If not then change the profit center master data to be valid from an earlier date (Tcode KE52). Steps-
KE52 - Profit Center FIREPRODMY
Click Change Validity Period (Ctrl +F1)
Valid from - put a date earlier or equal to 14.08.2009
Click Activate (Shift + F1)
Thanks,

SAP HUM Issue while Posting TO.

Hi There,
I have issue while doing picking for HUM with Nested HU.
Scenario :
- We have Nested HU with 11 Box packed on it. (10 Box Batch A + 1 Box Batch B).
- I have an outbound delivery for 1 material with split batch. (Batch A and Batch B). while doing picking against outbound delivery, i created a TO. System did proposed me a Nested HU for picking. I created a Pick HU by LH01 as well to repack what i want to pick. All worked fine till now.
- Now I want to pick 1 box of Batch A and 1 Box of Batch B.
- I can not do that. I am keep getting error i do not have enough material on nested HU, how ever i do!!!
- IFFFF,
I do have only 1 Batch to pick ( NO Split delivery), from same Nested HU, i can always pick 1 box. Either Batch A or Batch B with full QTY. I only get error for Batch split scenario for picking.
Can any one help me on that?
Smit.

You should debug your program and see where exactly and what causes this behavior.
In this way you will have a cause of the issue and could be able to retrace it back to the root cause of the problem.
Just one more thing to clarify... Your TO is created and the system did propose your nested HU for picking but when you pick from it, you get the error message?
Can you please write the exact error message number and description?

Issue while posting billing doc to account

Hi All,
There is an inssue with an inbound idoc, actually when an inbound idoc is recieved, sales order is created automatically, but while posting the billing document to account it shows an error, pricing error in item, and when we check the the data in idoc we are getting it selects the wrong Relational owener id which are not maintained, so i need to find out in which exit i can the logic for that please help me.
The error is not consistent , sometime it works and sometime does not.
see the below
''When we change this Relational Owner from ‘F’ to ‘J’, they are able to posting their accounts. I want to know from where this ‘F’ is getting populated because we didn’t maintain ‘F’ anywhere. Need to know from where –F is getting populated in the sales order''.
Thanks
Ik

Hello Khan ,
You need to solve this issue on your own by debugging. I suggest you to set a watch point on the filed i,e variable-name = '-F' to know how it is being populated.
Thanks

Issue while posting physical inventory document

Hi Team,
While posting a physical inventory document system is giving error message saying that
HU exists at another point in the warehouse. Clear the HU first
Message no. /SCWM/GM751
here is my scenario: As per the system bin is empty, while doing physical inventory we found and counted one HU in the same bin. while posting the same physical inventory document we are getting the above error message. as per the system this HU available in some other bin.
could you please let us know is there any process which i am missing before posting the PI document.
while posting the PI document is it not possible automatically HU get move from one bin to other bin?
Thanks
Mastan

Hi kmastanrao
All above suggestion given need to check.
1. Check HU available in WH. In EWM monitor and HU details.
And after finding the status of HU and use as you need in your process.
second if needed I can provide HU table in EWM which can be used.
Regards
Suraj

Dealer Excise Invoice-Issue while posting MIRO

Dear All,
Today i was doing Domestic procurement with Dealer for Gas Cylinder. In PO we entered total value which includes Excise amount also (1000+103)& VAT @ 14% (154,42).
While doing GR i selected as Only captured excise inv, checked MRP indicator.
Changed the bse value to 1000, entered BED as 100, E Cess as 2 & SEcess as 1.
The accounting entries were correct, Inventory is posting with Rs 1000
Posted excise invoice in J1IEX, the values were coming from GR, its correct and the acc entries were also OK with 103 Cenvat clearing acc Cr & Excise acc Dr.
While posting MIRO, I am facing problems...
In line item i am getting as 1103 Base value...
VAT is calculating on (1103+103) @ 14% 168.84,
so total value is 1271.84
When i simulate, its showing
Vendor 1271.84 Cr
GR/IR clg acc 1000 Dr
Material 103 Dr
VAT 168,84 Dr
There is no cenvat clearing account here
Please help me how to resolve this.
Regds,
CB
When i simulate

Hi,
have you mainatin 100% setoof condition check it it should be there
check MIRo posting date and excise invoice posting date
check condition record validity in FV13
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Edited by: kailasugale on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 PM

Issue while posting XML to BAPI_LEAD_CREATE

I am stuck while trying to HTTP post an XML to Gateway Service which calls the BAPI_LEAD_CREATE in SAP CRM. The request is posted from the REST CLIENT In Firefox and i get an non descriptive HTTP 400 error in response
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><error xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata"><code/><message xml:lang="en">
System expected the element '{&EXPECTED_NAMESPACE&}&EXPECTED_NAME&'</message>
</error>
I am unable to figure what the issue is, because i have used the Standard atom Envelope for the Request Body and have ensured the required data elements are present in the XML string
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<atom:entry
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/atom"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices"
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata">
<atom:content type="application/xml">
<m:properties>
<d:value>xxx@xxxxxx,com</d:value>
<d:scheme_id>Z_CRM_LEAD_FINAL</d:scheme_id>
<d:scheme_agency_id>E61</d:scheme_agency_id>
<d:process_type_1>dmy1</d:process_type_1>
<d:lead_type>dmy1</d:lead_type>
<d:process_type_2>L</d:process_type_2>
<d:lead_type_1>dmy2</d:lead_type_1>
<d:partner_fct>L</d:partner_fct>
<d:title_p>M</d:title_p>
<d:firstname>sriram</d:firstname>
<d:lastname>vasudevan</d:lastname>
<d:city>bangalore</d:city>
<d:street>sjri</d:street>
<d:street_no>20</d:street_no>
<d:country>india</d:country>
<d:region>karnataka</d:region>
<d:tel1_numbr>900-000-002</d:tel1_numbr>
<d:fax_number>900-000-002</d:fax_number>
<d:partner_fct_1>C</d:partner_fct_1>
<d:title_p_1>M</d:title_p_1>
<d:firstname_1>sriram</d:firstname_1>
<d:lastname_1>vasudevan</d:lastname_1>
<d:city_1>C</d:city_1>
<d:street_1>C</d:street_1>
<d:street_no_1>S</d:street_no_1>
<d:country_1>I</d:country_1>
<d:region_1>T</d:region_1>
<d:e_mail>xxx@xxxxxx,com</d:e_mail>
<d:tel1_numbr_1>9</d:tel1_numbr_1>
<d:fax_number_1>9</d:fax_number_1>
</m:properties>
</atom:content>
</atom:entry>
Any help with this is appreciated.

Chandan
Couldn't figure out your reply on the payload, i have instead attached the Metadata for your reference, can you help me structure the payload
... Metadata
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<edmx:Edmx Version="1.0" xmlns:edmx="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/06/edmx" xmlns:gp="http://www.sap.com/Protocols/SAPData/GenericPlayer" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata" xmlns:sap="http://www.sap.com/Protocols/SAPData">
<edmx:DataServices m:DataServiceVersion="2.0">
<Schema Namespace="Z_CRM_LEAD_FINAL" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2008/09/edm">
<EntityType Name="z_crm_lead_final" m:HasStream="false" sap:content-version="1">
<Key>
<PropertyRef Name="scheme_id" />
<PropertyRef Name="scheme_agency_id" />
<PropertyRef Name="value" />
</Key>
<Property Name="row" Type="Edm.Int32" sap:label="Lines in parameter" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="log_no" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="20" sap:label="Log number" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="process_type_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="4" sap:label="Transaction Type" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="street_no" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="12" sap:label="Street Code" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="partner_fct_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="tel1_numbr_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="firstname" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="40" sap:label="First name" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="message_v4" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="50" sap:label="Message Variable" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="parameter" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="32" sap:label="Parameter Name" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="message_v2" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="50" sap:label="Message Variable" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="field" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="30" sap:label="Field name" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="scheme_id" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" MaxLength="30" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="country" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="3" sap:label="Country Key" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="fax_number" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="30" sap:label="Fax" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="e_mail" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="241" sap:label="E-Mail Address" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="number" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="3" sap:label="Message number" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="scheme_agency_id" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" MaxLength="16" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="system" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="10" sap:label="Logical system (source of message)" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="title_p_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="partner_fct" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="8" sap:label="Partner Function" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="message_v1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="50" sap:label="Message Variable" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="street" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="60" sap:label="Street" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="lead_type" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="4" sap:label="Lead Group" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="process_type_2" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="message_v3" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="50" sap:label="Message Variable" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="lastname" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="40" sap:label="Last name" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="street_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="title_p" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="30" sap:label="Title" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="region" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="3" sap:label="Region" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="lastname_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="region_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="log_msg_no" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="6" sap:label="Message serial no." sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="type" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Message type" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="country_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="tel1_numbr" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="30" sap:label="Telephone" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="firstname_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="street_no_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="message" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="220" sap:label="Message text" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="id" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="20" sap:label="Message Class" sap:creatable="false" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="city" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="40" sap:label="City" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="city_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="value" Type="Edm.String" Nullable="false" MaxLength="72" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="fax_number_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
<Property Name="lead_type_1" Type="Edm.String" MaxLength="1" sap:label="Updated info. user data field" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:filterable="false" />
</EntityType>
<EntityContainer Name="Z_CRM_LEAD_FINAL" m:IsDefaultEntityContainer="true">
<EntitySet Name="z_crm_lead_finalCollection" EntityType="Z_CRM_LEAD_FINAL.z_crm_lead_final" sap:content-version="1" sap:creatable="true" sap:updatable="false" sap:deletable="false" />
</EntityContainer>
</Schema>
</edmx:DataServices>
</edmx:Edmx>
--> ....
Appreciate your help on this.

Error while posting messages to SOAP sender adapter SP 13

Hi Friends,
I have configured a SOAP sender adapter in XI 3.0 and is using the URL
http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:BS_WEBSERVICE:CC_WEBSERVICE_SOAP to post the messages. When I open the URL in the browser I am getting the error.
Message Servlet is in Status ERROR
Status information:
Servlet com.sap.aii.af.mp.soap.web.MessageServlet (Version $Id: //tc/aii/30_VAL_REL/src/_adapters/_soap/java/com/sap/aii/af/mp/soap/web/MessageServlet.java#5 $) bound to /MessageServlet
Classname ModuleProcessor: null
Lookupname for localModuleProcessorLookupName: localejbs/ModuleProcessorBean
Lookupname for remoteModuleProcessorLookupName: null
ModuleProcessorClass not instantiated
ModuleProcessorLocal not instantiated
ModuleProcessorRemote not instantiated
But when I test the URL http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/HelperServlet?action=FindChannel&channel=:BS_WEBSERVICE:CC_WEBSERVICE_SOAP to check the communication channel I am getting the right response as below.
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/HelperServlet?action=FindChannel&channel=:BS_EBTR_WEBSERVICE:CC_EBTR_WEBSERVICE_SOAP> <s:ChannelInfo xmlns:s="http://sap.com/xi/WebService/xi30">
<channelID>e7ac884596ea3d088cbfd8b434f942f2</channelID>
<name>CC_WEBSERVICE_SOAP</name>
<type xmlns:st="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">st:SOAP</type>
<direction>INBOUND</direction>
<party />
<service>BS_WEBSERVICE</service>
</s:ChannelInfo
I used the http capture to debug, In the 1st case though I am getting "Message Servlet in status error" I am seeing a 200 OK code in the http capture tool. When the message is posted from .net client proxy we are getting a 500 internal server error.
Am not sure what causes the error ? I saw two notes in SDN related to SOAP - J2EE SP13. We are in SP13. Is this the issue ? Wanted to know your opinion before applying the notes.
Thanks & Regards,
Mathew

ABAP & Java stack was on different SP levels.

BRS issue while posting in ff67

Hi experts
I done brs changes in my server, that one i implemented in client server. While testing in client server t code ff67. checking in feba its not posted, the error system showing "give movement typ x1 to x50". This is nothing but transaction type so i added in variant one field Tran type. But while procedding ff67 the message "values are ignored". I know that because i am using int algorithm so that system not picking tran type. but for posting its mandatory. I don t know what i do. How can i insert
Tran type under variant even though i am using int algorithm. Please give a solution.
Thanks
Regards
Mani.S

hi
I already copied standard and added tran type but while doing ff67. system showing values message "values are ignored".
i double clicked that warning message. i come to know that why because i am using bank reference remaining field it will not consider. But system picking profit center field not tran type field. But tran type field is mandatory we have to use.
Please give me a solution how to make use tran type field in ff67. ( here i have use bank ref as well as tran type)
Thanks
Regards
Mani.S
Edited by: smanimba1 on Oct 31, 2011 10:29 AM

Decimal Issue while posting annual salary using HCM P&F

Hello All
We are facing a strange problem while updating the Annual Salary of Infotype 0008 using HCM P&F. User in the form can enter a wage type amount, based on this wage type amount the annual salary is getting calculated by the std. way.
Now the problem here is, say we are passing Hourly wages as 55.000 USD3, the annual salary should have been updated as 114400.00 USD (i.e. 55 * 2080 Hours Annually). But after the posting when we see the annual salary amount it is displayed as 11440.00 USD (Strange!! It is divided by 10 ). But the wage type amount is properly displayed as 55.000 USD3 in PA20. All the other infotypes are updated correctly with the new pay structure and work schedule details correctly.
Appreciate your help, if any of you have come across this issue before.
Thank you.
Regards
Ranganath

hahahahahahaha
Been down this road before.
Pretty much it is exactly as said....decimal for currency issue. Some currencies use 2 decimal places...some use 4...and better yet, SAP allows you to even configure your own if needed.
Now, how did WE solve this. We tore apart (debugging) the actual code SAP uses in PA30 when showing/editting/updating Basic Pay. You will see in there how they work the "magic". Oddly.....the look at the decimal setting, multiply it out in the background to store correctly but pull a "switch-a-roo" on the front end to display it correctly as the user would expect (ie 4 decimals for example). It's pretty crazy stuff.
But we got it working....via code in our own generic service......and it worked like a charm.

Issue while posting using goods issue for delivery type NL

Hello Experts,
I have created an outbound delivery for an intra-company transfer (within same company code) between two plants. The delivery type in NL (replinishment delivery)
When i am trying to post the goods issue from supplying plant, I am getting following error
"Account type K is not defined for document type WL".
Delivery type NL should not be used to issue stock to vendor but I am not issuing it to any external vendor , issuing the stokc only to a receiving plant.
Please help to understand why i am getting this error.
Regards,
Nish.

Hi,
If you are doing an STO Scenario, Check whether you have created the supplying plant as a vendor.
The Vendor Account group should be plants.
Also check whether you have given the plant in the vendor master Purchasing Data - Extras tab in the menu click on add purchasing data & check.
If you haven't assigned this, do the same & create a fresh STO & check.
Hope it will work.
Thanks & Regards,

Issue while posting through MIRO

Hi,
I am posting through MIRO.
I am using two POs in MIRO from different contracts.
When I add them for one PO amount and QTY feild is filled up properly,
but for other the value of QYT is filled into amount and qty field.
Could any one help in solving this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
You ae trying to post two POs from different contracts (i assume for same vednor)
When you allocate the first PO, everythin is fine
when you subsequently allocate the second PO, the vale and qty fields are not populated properly.
Is this right?
What values are going to the qty and value fields of second PO?

Issue while posting message to queue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for