Issue with Action

For an action "edit non employee", after entering new row for IT1, if hit Enter before clicking save button, IT1 screen jumps to the last row of already created data and the new values are lost. For now work around is not to hit enter but save new values by directly clicking the Save Button. It is hard to always remember.
Thanks!

Hi,
check the operation what you stated for IT 0001 whether it is INS / COP / MOD for your action type.
regards.

Similar Messages

Issue with action 'Place' in CS3

I have been having an issue with an action I made. The action is:
{Set Background
Set Layer Styles of current layer
Image Size
Canvas Size
Place
Move Current layer
Save}
My issue is when it come to 'place' if the image is larger than the window it will center to the window not the canvas.
The details of 'Place' are:
filename.jgp
Center: center
Translate: 0 inches, 0 inches
I was wondering if there was anything in the action I should have added.
Also, could someone explain why it does this?

Thanks for the help. It worked, kinda...
It was already checked so I unchecked>applied. Tested it. It didn't properly scale the placed image
Went in checked it. Tested it. It worked like a charm.
Restarted PS with it still checked, tested the action and I had the orginal issue.
Checked my preferences and it was still checked.
Unchecked>applied.
Checked>applied -worked fine.
I'm assuming this is an error in the program that it is not properly reading the preferences. Any ideas?
Thanks!
Ann

Issue with Action Links

Hi All,
We have implemented the Action Links.
Issue: A particular order number is present in 14 different organizations.
when the order number and the Org Name is selected we are able to all the records.
We have included the Action Link column to the above request, then we are only able to see 3 records, the other organization records are not able to view.
SQL generated after including the Action Link column is
select distinct T259660.SALES_ORDER_NUM as c1,
T334186.BASE_ORG_NAME as c2,
sum(case when T265919.W_XACT_TYPE_CODE = 'Regular' and T262056.W_STATUS_CODE <> 'Cancelled' then T259660.NET_AMT * T259660.GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE else 0 end ) as c3
from
W_INT_ORG_DH T334186 /* Dim_W_INT_ORG_DH_Sales_Org */ ,
W_SALES_ORDER_LINE_F T259660 /* Fact_W_SALES_ORDER_LINE_F */ ,
W_STATUS_D T262056 /* Dim_W_STATUS_D_Order_Status */ ,
W_XACT_TYPE_D T265919 /* Dim_W_XACT_TYPE_D_Sales_Ordlns */
where ( T259660.XACT_TYPE_WID = T265919.ROW_WID and T259660.ORDER_STATUS_WID = T262056.ROW_WID
and T259660.SALES_ORDER_NUM = '1000004' and T259660.SALES_ORG_WID = T334186.ORG_WID
and T259660.DELETE_FLG = 'N' and (T334186.ROW_WID in (0) or T334186.PRIMARY_FLG in ('Y'))
and (T334186.ROW_WID in (0) or T334186.W_HIERARCHY_CLASS in ('NON-HRORG'))
and (T334186.ROW_WID in (0) or T334186.SALES_ORG_FLG in ('Y')) )
group by T259660.SALES_ORDER_NUM, T334186.ORG_WID, T334186.BASE_ORG_NAME
order by c1, c2
select concat(concat('<a href="', T623258.ORDER_HEADER_ACTION_LINK_URL), '"> Link to EBS Source Order</a>') as c1,
T623258.HEADER_ID as c2
from
+(SELECT header_id+
+,fnd_run_function.get_run_function_url+
+(+
CAST
+(fnd_function.get_function_id ('ISC_ORDINF_DETAILS_PMV') AS NUMBER)+
+,CAST (272 AS NUMBER)+
+,CAST (53059 AS NUMBER)+
+,CAST (0 AS NUMBER)+
+, 'HeaderId='+
+|| header_id+
+|| '&pFunctionName=ISC_ORDINF_DETAILS_PMV&pMode=NO&pageFunctionName=ISC_ORDINF_DETAILS_PMV'+
+,NULL) AS order_header_action_link_url+
FROM oe_order_headers_all) T623258
order by c2
By executing these 2 generated queries we are able to see all the headers ids for a particular order same in both the queries.
But even then the results are not shown in the Answers.
Can any one have an idea how to fix it.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Vishwanath

For the action Links i have created a opaque view with the Query
SELECT CAST(header_id as Varchar2(80)) as HEADER_ID
+,fnd_run_function.get_run_function_url+
+(+
CAST
+(fnd_function.get_function_id ('ISC_ORDINF_DETAILS_PMV') AS NUMBER)+
+,CAST (valueof(NQ_SESSION.OLTP_EBS_RESP_APPL_ID) AS NUMBER)+
+,CAST (valueof(NQ_SESSION.OLTP_EBS_RESP_ID) AS NUMBER)+
+,CAST (valueof(NQ_SESSION.OLTP_EBS_SEC_GROUP_ID) AS NUMBER)+
+, 'HeaderId='+
+|| header_id+
+|| '&pFunctionName=ISC_ORDINF_DETAILS_PMV&pMode=NO&pageFunctionName=ISC_ORDINF_DETAILS_PMV'+
+,NULL) AS ORDER_HEADER_ACTION_LINK_URL+
FROM oe_order_headers_all
When we created a request in the answers using the above opaque view, it is taking lot of time around 12 min.
when i executed the query returned from session log in the database it took less than a second.
not sure what causing the performance issue.
Can any one help me out.
Regards
Vishwanath.

Issue with Action pane sap bpc 7.5 MS

Hello All,
Got a issue , when clicking the dimension to select members in action pane it shows blank box .
Is there any XLS setting that needs to be in place OR any other thing needs to be fixed??
It happens only with one id.
Kindly help on this.
Thanks
Venkkat

Hi Venkat,
if your sp is 3 or lower then this is an old issue and you have to upgrade to sp4 or higher, if it occurs on web see please this note 1746878 - BPC MS: Action Pane Disappears from BPC Web Interface otherwise plese add you sp version.
Regards
Roberto

Issues with Action Wizart to remove security

Hi,
I am using action wizard in Adobe11 to remove security from group of files, but it asks for password for every file and also prompts to save the file for each file. In earlier versions I used to do this with batch processing and it used to ask the password only for the first file and assumed same password for remaining, this is not happening in Adobe 11. Any help of this is highly appriciated.
Thanks
Vineet Neema

Hello Maureen,
Thanks for posting, but I'm not sure I see if your question
relates to Acrobat.com
Are you using any of the Acrobat.com Services as any part of
your workflow?
Thanks!
Pete

Anybody else have an issue with actions disappearing and having to reinstall ALL of them?

Every few weeks, my actions disappear from Photoshop and I have to reinstall ALL of them? Anybody else have this issue?

I have occasionally lost data connectivity when I leave my house and have to flip airplane mode on then off to restore it. Otherwise I'm not near large crowds to see if I have any connectivity issues.
Do you know if you have the Portico update? Go to Settings > About and tap on more info. See what the OS version is. Portico is 8.0.10211.204.
Just want to see if its a build issue and may be non-Portico devices are having reception problems when it come to crowd density....
Also give Nokia a call, they would be interested in this issue and would tell you if its definitely a phone issue or OS. You can also post to their community and see if anyone else has some answers, http://discussions.nokia.com/t5/Nokia-Lumia/bd-p/Nokia_with_Windows_Phone

Security issues with action commands....

Hi
I have a webapplication that under its context has two diffenent
maps, one is admin and the other one is user.
I use an ActionRouter and has actions like list-clients.do.
The admin map is restricted area described in web.xml.
You have to be in AdminRole to get access.
My problem is that if I log in as user, I can "shoot" actions commands
like list-clients.do from the user area and Servlet maps to the proper
jsp that is in the admin map. When I then try isUserInRole and so on
there is only a quetstionmark. If I run from admin area the isUserInRole
knows who is logged in.
I put in the list-clients.do in the url like: http://myplace.com/users/list-clients.do and servlet reply with jsp from
admin area.
Anybody know why not the restricted area declared in the web.xml file
works during that condition, and how to solve this?
Im working with Tomcat 4.1 and use SingleSignOn.
Heres my web.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app>
<filter>
<filter-name>loginfilter</filter-name>
<filter-class>argus.web.util.LoginFilter</filter-class>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>loginfilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/admin/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>loginfilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/user/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>action</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>argus.web.servlet.ActionServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>setup</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>argus.web.servlet.SetupServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>action</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>*.do</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<session-config>
<session-timeout>0</session-timeout>
</session-config>
<security-constraint>
<display-name>ArgusAdmin</display-name>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>AdminAdaptor</web-resource-name>
<url-pattern>/admin/*</url-pattern>
<http-method>GET</http-method>
<http-method>POST</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>ArgusAdmin</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<security-constraint>
<display-name>ArgusUser</display-name>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>UserAdaptor</web-resource-name>
<url-pattern>/user/*</url-pattern>
<url-pattern>/index.htm</url-pattern>
<http-method>GET</http-method>
<http-method>POST</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>ArgusAdmin</role-name>
<role-name>ArgusUser</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<login-config>
<auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
<form-login-config>
<form-login-page>/login.htm</form-login-page>
<form-error-page>/loginError.htm</form-error-page>
</form-login-config>
</login-config>
<security-role>
<role-name>ArgusAdmin</role-name>
</security-role>
<security-role>
<role-name>ArgusUser</role-name>
</security-role>
</web-app>
Many Thanks
Ben

I found them in my firewall list on my Windows 8.1 Pro installation and posted a question on a forum as well, though I don't think it was here. I don't believe anyone ever answered.
It looks as though these are parts of the bundled virtual private networking clients.
Note, for example, the "distributed by Microsoft as part of Windows 8.1" wording on this page:
http://www.sonicwall.com/app/projects/file_downloader/document_lib.php?t=PG&id=605
-Noel
Detailed how-to in my eBooks:
Configure The Windows 7 "To Work" Options
Configure The Windows 8 "To Work" Options

Facing issue with Action Menu

Hi all,
I've created an Action Menu to open a link on a new page, however it is not working. I changed the URL to call some external website (Ex. www.google.com) but even so it doesn't do anything. Is there any setup that can prevent links from Action Menu (Table component) to be executed? Is there any bug related to this? I've tried the same on a different page, enabling exactly the same URL and on the other page, it works.
I'd appreciate any help or comment.
Thanks,
Eduardo

Hi Dan,
I solved the issue by including a "GROUP BY" statement in my EQL Query. This really seems to be a bug since my query doesn't need a Group By. I set the Group By for the record ID and I'm testing whether it caused any side effect.
Thanks and Regards,
Eduardo

Speed issue with Action Listener

I have a JCombobox that has an action listener that waits for an action to be performed.
When I update the Combobox list by using removeAllItems() and then loop additem on an array to rebuild it, It take 14 seconds to rebuild the list.
When I remove my action listener, it does it instantly. I tried setEnable(false) on my combobox to disable the action listener temporarily while I update the combobox, but it doesn't appear to work.
Looking for a way to disable my listener temporarily to increase performance when I update it.
Thanks in advance.

Nevermind. got it.

Issue with Action in Transaction

Hi Experts
I have Created new action and assigned it to lead., this action is to create work flow ( WS10001011 ) for opportunities from lead if the user status is equal to "Accepted by sales". But when ever lead status is changing to "Accepted by sales". We have observed that no action is being performed and when i clicked on action push button in pop-up i am getting this message "There are no actions in the worklist"
Can you please assist what need to be modified.
Thanks in advance
Vinay

SAP supplies standard workflow from Lead to Opportunity which does not use actions.
It uses events which are triggered based on user status.
You might like to do it that way and see if it works.
Best regards,
Koshal

Performance issues with dynamic action (PL/SQL)

Hi!
I'm having perfomance issues with a dynamic action that is triggered on a button click.
I have 5 drop down lists to select columns which the users want to filter, 5 drop down lists to select an operation and 5 boxes to input values.
After that, there is a filter button that just submits the page based on the selected filters.
This part works fine, the data is filtered almost instantaneously.
After this, I have 3 column selectors and 3 boxes where users put values they wish to update the filtered rows to,
There is an update button that calls the dynamic action (procedure that is written below).
It should be straight out, the only performance issue could be the decode section, because I need to cover cases when user wants to set a value to null (@) and when he doesn't want update 3 columns, but less (he leaves '').
Hence P99_X_UC1 || ' = decode(' || P99_X_UV1 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC1 ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV1 ||')
However when I finally click the update button, my browser freezes and nothing happens on the table.
Can anyone help me solve this and improve the speed of the update?
Regards,
Ivan
P.S. The code for the procedure is below:
create or replace
PROCEDURE DWP.PROC_UPD
(P99_X_UC1 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_UV1 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_UC2 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_UV2 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_UC3 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_UV3 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_COL in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_O in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_V in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_COL2 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_O2 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_V2 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_COL3 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_O3 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_V3 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_COL4 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_O4 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_V4 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_COL5 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_O5 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_V5 in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_CD in VARCHAR2,
P99_X_VD in VARCHAR2
) IS
l_sql_stmt varchar2(32600);
p_table_name varchar2(30) := 'DWP.IZV_SLOG_DET';
BEGIN
l_sql_stmt := 'update ' || p_table_name || ' set '
|| P99_X_UC1 || ' = decode(' || P99_X_UV1 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC1 ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV1 ||'),'
|| P99_X_UC2 || ' = decode(' || P99_X_UV2 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC2 ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV2 ||'),'
|| P99_X_UC3 || ' = decode(' || P99_X_UV3 ||','''','|| P99_X_UC3 ||',''@'',null,'|| P99_X_UV3 ||') where '||
P99_X_COL ||' '|| P99_X_O ||' ' || P99_X_V || ' and ' ||
P99_X_COL2 ||' '|| P99_X_O2 ||' ' || P99_X_V2 || ' and ' ||
P99_X_COL3 ||' '|| P99_X_O3 ||' ' || P99_X_V3 || ' and ' ||
P99_X_COL4 ||' '|| P99_X_O4 ||' ' || P99_X_V4 || ' and ' ||
P99_X_COL5 ||' '|| P99_X_O5 ||' ' || P99_X_V5 || ' and ' ||
P99_X_CD || ' = ' || P99_X_VD ;
--dbms_output.put_line(l_sql_stmt);
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE l_sql_stmt;
END;

Hi Ivan,
I do not think that the decode is performance relevant. Maybe the update hangs because some other transaction has uncommitted changes to one of the affected rows or the where clause is not selective enough and needs to update a huge amount of records.
Besides that - and I might be wrong, because I only know some part of your app - the code here looks like you have a huge sql injection vulnerability here. Maybe you should consider re-writing your logic in static sql. If that is not possible, you should make sure that the user input only contains allowed values, e.g. by white-listing P99_X_On (i.e. make sure they only contain known values like '=', '<', ...), and by using dbms_assert.enquote_name/enquote_literal on the other P99_X_nnn parameters.
Regards,
Christian

MGE - issues with pers. actions for delegation in ECC6.0 - management of global employees

Hi experts,
during implementation of MGE at my client we are facing issues with the personnel actions for delegation.
We were using the standard actions as follows, without success.
action Expatriation planning (81), IG 92 via PA40 --> new persno. has been created successfully, empl. status has been set to withdrawn, IT715 "host" has been set to "planned", IT710 has been filled (required fields only, no admin, no manager, no sending pers. assignment info), all payroll relevant ITs have been skipped (706 + 707)
IT715 has been set to "to be activated" via PA30
running of report RPMGE_Activation for newly created persno.(assignment nr), pers. action 82 Activation in host country, IG GE --> following ISSUES occure:
Action can not be executed via PA40 (is this normal behaviour?)
when running with report, employm. status changed to active
IT715 "host" has not been changed updated in status (should have been updated to "in progress", right?)
IT715 "home" has not been created (correct?)
IT710 has not changed
Background information:
> Switch MAINS is activated
> We are not going to use global payroll! No switch has been activated. Payroll will always run in home country, so the client does not want to use any of the py relevant ITs dealing with global employment.
Many thanks + best wishes,
Evelyn

Hi experts,
short update on our issue:
After several times of trying the same thing, the report worked out fine as it should for 82 and also in the next step for 83. IT715 is going to be updated correctly. We need to work with the report and not with PA40.
Some open questions remain:
- Set home assignment to active during delegation (not to inactive for payroll reasons in home country)
Documentation for RPMGE_Activation says
Home Activation (Active) (84)
Same process as described above, excpet that in the third step, the Employment Status field in infotype Action (0000) is set to Active if there are any trailing payments in the home country.
We understand that 84 is identical to 83 but employment status is different.
For action 84 a different IG is underlying (93) than for 83 (GE) and also it is called "Change expat.planning". The Action does not seem to work with the report as well.
>> Is this correct? Do we need to create our own Home Activation (Active) Action by coping 83, changing the employment status setting?
How do we need to configure Feature ACTCE then? EXPATACTHOME would need to have 2 entires at the end, no?
- End of delegation
Which actions are used for end of delegation? Are there standard once that we could not find?
We would like to set the host country to withdrawn and the home country back to active (also change of employee group in this case).
Also using the logic of IT715, is there any automatic way of changing the host country record to status completed, or would we use an exit action, including IT715 and set status manually?
Same question for home country.
Many Thanks,
Evelyn

So, about a week ago my macbook pro started having lots of issues: wifi connectivity, slow performance, sound issues, spotlight wasn't working. After going through the issues with apple support, they decided the best course of action was to erase it...

So, about a week ago my macbook pro started having lots of issues: wifi connectivity, slow performance, sound issues, spotlight wasn't working. After going through the issues with apple support, they decided the best course of action was to erase the hard drive and do a reinstall. Since I have a recent backup this seemed like a good enough option. They were kind enough to send me a copy of the snow leopard disk to do the install since we couldn't get it to complete through the disk utility. Not sure why, since it says we are fully connected, it just never completed.
Anyway, so now that you have the background here is the new issue. The macbook pro keeps spitting out the disk I'm trying to install from. Disk utility and using the 'Startup Disk' function from the apple menu doesn't read the disk.
Can anyone suggest a solution to this vexing problem?
Thanks in advance.

Jeremy.Laurin,
have you tried agb76’s approach here?

Issue with folder action created with automator

Hello all,
I'm having an issue with folder actions that i created with automator and it's driving me crazy. Apple says they can't help with things created by the user so this is my only shot at figuring this out.
Running a Mini 2.3G quad i7, 8GB ram on OSX Mavericks 10.9.2
My goal is to set up an action to add text to the filename of a file placed into a particular folder. So I open automator and choose folder action. Then I choose the folder I want the action applied to at the top. Then I go to Files and Folders in the library and choose rename finder items and drag it over to the workflow. I select add text, then add the text I want added to the file name and choose before name because I want the added text to preceede the original filename text. I save it then go to the folder I applied it to and right clikc go to services then folder actions and verify that the service is attached to that particular folder and it is.
Should work right? No. When I place a file in that folder the action runs and adds the text like I want it to... but then it starts to add it over and over again in an infinite loop. It also adds a file with the extension .ds_store to the folder that also has the name added over and over.
I've tried deleteing all the folder actions and even deleteing all the folder actions themselves saved by the automator in the workflow file in the user library.
I'm stumped... no idea what to do. A while ago I had used the automator to batch rename files and it worked perfectly. I tried the same steps i listed above to set this action up on a machine in an Apple retail store and it worked... so I know I have the set up right.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Justin

Hi JK257
This is why it happens:
The folder action is looking for new items in the folder. You drop in a file called "File1". So it renames it "sometext File1". Then it sees this new file called "sometext File1" and thinks "Hey, this is a new file - I'll call it 'sometext sometext File1' because I have to rename every new file." Then it sees this new file called "sometext sometext File1" and thinks...
You get the picture.
(the .ds_store is a normally hidden database file which is getting revealed by the same process.)
The solution is to move the files out of the renamer folder into a receiving folder after they have been renamed:
Hope this helps,
H

Issue with applying Event Action filters

Dear friends,
A general question on Event Action filters. There is a signature with sig ID 6257.
The following is the event action filter configuration:
service event-action-rules rules0
filters edit DHCP
signature-id-range 6257
subsignature-id-range 0
attacker-address-range 172.20.20.10,172.20.20.11
actions-to-remove produce-alert
filter-item-status Enabled
stop-on-match True
os-relevance not-relevant
exit
Even though a valid DHCP offer is being given by the DHCP server, this alert is getting fired.
We have even excluded the IP's of the DHCP Servers - 172.20.20.10 and 172.20.20.11 from the Attacker Address range parameter in the signature but still this alert gets fired.
evIdsAlert: eventId=1204853641442197329 vendor=Cisco severity=low
originator:
hostId: IDSM2Core1
appName: sensorApp
appInstanceId: 592
time: April 7, 2008 5:46:48 AM UTC offset=180 timeZone=1
signature: description=DHCP Client DoS id=6257 version=S316
subsigId: 0
sigDetails: Server Offered a Malicious IP Address
marsCategory: DoS/Host
interfaceGroup: vs0
vlan: 200
participants:
attacker:
addr: 172.20.20.10 locality=OUT
port: 0
target:
addr: 10.1.1.78 locality=OUT
port: 0
os: idSource=unknown type=unknown relevance=unknown
summary: 4 final=true initialAlert=1204853641442197267 summaryType=Regular
alertDetails: Regular Summary: 4 events this interval ;
riskRatingValue: 25 targetValueRating=medium
threatRatingValue: 25
interface: ge0_7
protocol: udp
Looking forward to your kind help and advise on this.
Thanks a lot
Gautam

Some things to check:
1) Is the filter in the active list? Filters can be enabled or disabled, but they can also be active ro inactive. You've only show a part of your configuration so I can't tell if the filter is part of the active list.
2) Are there actions other than produce-alert for the signature? Or is an event action override adding other actions?
Produce-alert is not the only action that can cause an alert to be generated. The produce-verbose-alert, request-snmp-trap, log-attacker-packets, log-victim-packet, and log-pair-packets will also cause alerts to be generated. Modify the filter to also remove these actions.
3) The alert you've shown is a Summary Alert. There may be an issue with Summarization and the Filters. Try modifying the signature to set it to FireAll with no summarization.
4) If you have multiple filters then check the order of the filters. If the event is matching an earlier filter where the stop-on-match is set to True, then it will not check the event against this filter. Either move this filter up higher in the filter list, or change earlier filters to be "stop-on-match false".
5) Also check to see if you are running the latest 5.1(7) or 6.0(4) Service pack. If running earlier 5.1 or 6.0 versions you might be hitting a bug that could have already been fixed.
If none of the above help, then contact the TAC. It could be that you may have foung a bug that the sensor development team is unaware of.
To help in identifying the problem take a packet capture of the packets from 172.20.20.10 for several minutes around the time when the sensor is generating these alerts.
This way the team can both check if the signature is firing correctly, and if the filters are working correctly for that signature.

Issue with Action

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for