Issue with blocked invoices.

Hi All,
I am having an issue with few of our invoices are not releasing for payment.
Couple of them I noticed were due in June or July but were notpaid. These invoices were blocked due to price variance. Someone went and changed the price in P.O so the difference is within tolerance now. It should be released once 'MRBR' runs in batch everyday. but it's not.I dont see any reason it should be blocked now.
I know I can release it manually but we dont know how many are behaving this way.How should I find the reason why they are not getting released by MRBR.

Hi,
Do you have the workflow active?
Check transaction miro_workflow.
Cheers
Hein

Similar Messages

Issue with cancelled invoice

Hi all,
We got an issue with cancelled invoices.
The user cancelled an invoice and in leiu of that created one more invoice against that.
When we extracted the deltas to BI, the cancelled invoice is appearing as cancelled Item wise but not the entire document is cancelled.
Please suggest what can be the issue and how to rectify this.
Regards
Kumar

Hi
Please check in the delivery document in VBUK and VBUP tables. Also check in the delivery document as the status showing 'C' should be Fully Picked and not fully invoiced.Also check the copy controls VTFL.Can you let us know what is the billing document type that has been used for cancelling billing document. Check in the F2 billing document type weather cancellation billing document type has been assigned or not.
Regards
Srinath

Issues with AR Invoice form after sending barcode and tab data to PC

Hi,
We have a barcode system to scan ItemCodes and send 5 x tabs 'keypresses' to the checkout users PC.
This basically populates all the required fields on the AR Invoice row and jumps down to the next row ready for the next barcode.
We have recently upgrading to 8.8, and we have developed an annoying issue. Intermittently, the PCs not behaving as expected. Here are some of the bad results we have experienced:
1. The barcode scan is done, but the tabs being sent to the PC are not registered.. The PC just sits there with the cursor at the end of the (populated) ItemCode box without recognising that tabs have been sent
2. The barcode scan is done and the ItemCode box is populated as expected. However SAP has not processed all the expected tabs and the cursor remains one of the next few fields awaiting user input.
3. As above the barcode scan is done and the ItemCode box is populated as expected. However SAP has not processed all the expected tabs. Also, the cursor is not present within the current 'selected' field - it seems to have almost lost focus from the fields on the form. Note: the SAP window remains the active Window.
All of this means that the processing of Invoices is being delayed as tabs are not being processing and form focus is being lost.
The form settings are correct as they are unchanged from being working to suddenly stopping working. The issue is occasionally resolved by a reboot of the client PC in question.
Is this a known issue in 8.8? If not, is this most likely to be caused by display issues or SAP 8.8 not being able to handle the receipt of tab commands in such quick sucession?
Any pointers or comments from your experience would be appreciated.
Regards
OB

Which patch level are you using as this should be fixxed. I would also look if there are any conflicts with the add-ons as there some major changes in the SDK.

Issue with blocked TPM2 command (TPM 2.0)

I am developing an application that users TPM 2.0 and have implemented a command layer on top of TPM Base Services. Most of the commands I use work fine however when attempting to do TPM2_ContextSave is is blocked by TBS (TPM Base Services). The documentation
regarding blocked TPM commands seem not to cover TPM 2.0 and the measures described to unblock commands is not working for me. The documentation is found here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn466537.aspx
I have tried the described methods, i.e. gpedit as well as tpm.msc . With gpedit the blocking behaviour remains no matter what policy I attempt. With tpm.msc the UI for managing blocked commands, as described in the above article, is not even displayed. Note
that when testing the tpm.msc UI on Windows 7 the options are displayed exactly according to the documentation.
I am using a Surface 3 Pro tablet with Windows 8.1 Professional installed. Tracing TBS according to the instructions given here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh998628.aspx
Gives:
[0]0FE0.0FE4::01/19/2015-13:44:17.407 [drv] INFORMATION Sched20.cpp(393)
?SubmitRequest@Tpm20Scheduler@@QEAAJPEAVTpm20Request@@@Z:Blocking cmd (0x162) on context FFFFE00088AAB990 as not on allow-list for non-std user.
I.e. the command is blocked.
In addition to the methods described above I have tried the WMI Win32_Tpm interface and specifically the "RemoveBlockedCommand()" and "IsCommandBlocked()" calls. Where "IsCommandBlocked()" returns 0 i.e. the command is not blocked?
And "RemoveBlockedCommand()" returns 0, i.e. successful removal of the blocking command. However the command is still blocked and logged as blocked as seen in the above log.
Link to Win32_Tpm WMI class:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa376452(v=vs.85).aspx
It seems as if the API:s and documentation is not up-to-date for TPM 2.0 or I am doing something else incorrect.
Where can I find a way to unblock TPM2_ContextSave in TBS (TPM Base Services) for Windows 8.1 and TPM 2.0 hardware?

Hello gzon,
For this issue, I am trying to invoke someone experienced to help look into this thread, this may take some time and as soon as we get any result, we will post back.
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Goods issue with blocked serial number

Hi All,
I have the following issue:
I use serial numbers in the delivery, this is mandatory, if the material has a mandatory serial number profile in the material master.
In the delivery its possible to select for a free material a serial number that's blocked (stock type 07 Blocked stock) the system accepts that. This should not happen.
Does somebody know how to solve this issue
Thanks!

Hi,
Receive again with correct item code and ware house with same serial number.
If not, Please explain with an example.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Issue with Blocking RawInput (using Subclassing)

Hello,
We have an application that leverages RawInput and runs all the time. However it seams that it supports INPUTSINK so it gets all the messages regardless of whether it is in the foreground or not.
I want to stop it from getting the events that we don't want it to see.
I injected a DLL that subclassed the MessageHandler for the Window in the application, which we saw using Spy++. It is a 32 bit application.
We can see that the messages are coming as WM_INPUT.
However, we are NOT calling CallWindowProc, but instead reading the raw input and merely returning 0 (as per the raw input instructions). However, although we are NOT passing the call onto the original window, ill be darned if it doesn't react though as
if it does.
I, maybe incorrectly thought, that because we subclassed the window and are NOT calling the original WndProc, that we in fact, would be just "tossing" it away and that it would benefit us..
But not happening as we expect it too.
Is this not how you are supposed to intercept the keystrokes for the window? Or is somehow RawInput doing something we don't know about?
Thanks!

Hello thanks,
Here is the code itself IssueKiller :-)
Just to make sure I think I give all the right information
--I am certain the application uses RawInput and that I am targeting the correct Window that has registered for it, based on Spy++
--I can tell from Spy++ that it does receive WM_INPUTSINK (although I have no idea why)
--I realize that maybe I could just hook the RAWINPUT registration and change that particular value and return back a handle that doesn't do that but... I would rather not right now
--I can see after applying the below, that I get called and that after checking which window is in the foreground (I attempt to block and or pass it through)
--after doing what I think is a block... it still acts as though it receive the data in it's wndproc
--What I assume/assumed was it is RAWINPUT getting through...
--I don't wish to cloud this up, but I also discovered by using LISTDLLS that it loads DINPUT8... (what the heck would a program use DirectInput for) - ok games I get it and maybe some other types, but what we are doing.. Huh???? anyway... I read up and
still thought though
-----even if it uses DirectInput I thought maybe it would be for mouse input (as it does enable us to create in program macros of steps we perform), but who uses it for Keyboard input??? don't most people use Message Loops and or RawInput???
------I have no idea how to check, block or validate that they are in fact using DirectInput Keyboard input, but then I would suspect that it would not be using background mode.. BUT since it clearly is for RawInput... :-(
------lastly..... how in the world would someone coordinate collecting the same input on RawInput and DirectInput and not hose us up....
Anyhoo any thoughts are greatly appreciated. We are working with the vendor but not much progress
// dllmain.cpp : Defines the entry point for the DLL application.
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "Strsafe.h"
//Add the following
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>
namespace std {
#if defined _UNICODE || defined UNICODE
typedef wstring tstring;
#else
typedef string tstring;
#endif
using namespace std;
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
LONG_PTR oldhandler;
namespace std {
#if defined _UNICODE || defined UNICODE
typedef wstring tstring;
#else
typedef string tstring;
#endif
using namespace std;
HWND WMINPUTWindowHandle;
int CurrentProcessID = 0;
int CurrenThreadID = 0;
FILE* pFile;
BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HMODULE hModule,
DWORD ul_reason_for_call,
LPVOID lpReserved
switch (ul_reason_for_call)
case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:
  OutputDebugString(L"Process Attach called:\r\n");
  LONG error;
  CurrentProcessID = GetCurrentProcessId();
  oldhandler = SetWindowLongPtr(WMINPUTWindowHandle, GWLP_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)WndProc);
break;
case DLL_THREAD_ATTACH:
  break;
case DLL_THREAD_DETACH:
  break;
case DLL_PROCESS_DETACH:
  OutputDebugString(L"Process Detach called:\r\n");
  SetWindowLongPtr(WMINPUTWindowHandle, GWLP_WNDPROC, oldhandler);
break;
return TRUE;
bool processit;
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
switch (message)
  case WM_INPUT:
   OutputDebugString(L"Called:\r\n");
   UINT dwSize = 0;
   GetRawInputData((HRAWINPUT)lParam, RID_INPUT, NULL, &dwSize, sizeof(RAWINPUTHEADER));
   LPBYTE lpb = new BYTE[dwSize];
   if (lpb == NULL)
    break;
   if (GetRawInputData((HRAWINPUT)lParam, RID_INPUT, lpb, &dwSize, sizeof(RAWINPUTHEADER)) != dwSize)
    OutputDebugString(TEXT("GetRawInputData does not return correct size !\r\n"));
    return 0;
   RAWINPUT* raw = (RAWINPUT*)lpb;
   TCHAR szTempOutput[256];
   if (raw->header.dwType == RIM_TYPEKEYBOARD)
    HRESULT hResult = StringCchPrintf(szTempOutput, STRSAFE_MAX_CCH, TEXT(" Kbd: make=%04x Flags:%04x Reserved:%04x ExtraInformation:%08x, msg=%04x VK=%04x \r\n"),
     raw->data.keyboard.MakeCode,
     raw->data.keyboard.Flags,
     raw->data.keyboard.Reserved,
     raw->data.keyboard.ExtraInformation,
     raw->data.keyboard.Message,
     raw->data.keyboard.VKey);
    if (FAILED(hResult))
     if (lpb != NULL)
      delete lpb;
     return 0;//
    OutputDebugString(szTempOutput);
    //if the current
    if ((GetForegroundWindow() == WMINPUTWindowHandle))
     OutputDebugString(L"Calling CallWindProc because they matched:\r\n");
     if (lpb != NULL)
      delete lpb;
     return CallWindowProc((WNDPROC)oldhandler, hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
    else
     OutputDebugString(L"NOT Calling CallWindProc because they DID NOT matched:\r\n");
     if (lpb != NULL)
      delete lpb;
     return 0;
   else if (raw->header.dwType == RIM_TYPEMOUSE)
    if (GetForegroundWindow() == WMINPUTWindowHandle)
     if (lpb != NULL)
      delete lpb;
     return CallWindowProc((WNDPROC)oldhandler, hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
    else
     //ignore it
     if (lpb != NULL)
      delete lpb;
     return 0;
   return CallWindowProc((WNDPROC)oldhandler, hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
  default:
   OutputDebugString(L"DEFAULT: Call CallWindowProc:\r\n");
   return CallWindowProc((WNDPROC)oldhandler, hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
OutputDebugString(L"RETURNED 0:\r\n");
return 0;

Issue with 0SRM_TD_IV data source delta

Hi experts,
I have an issue with the invoices numbers not updated correctly when one of invoice item is deleted in SRM.
For example:
In SRM:
Invoice number: 50001168
Invoice item : 1, quantity: 30 - deleted ( deletion indicator - x)
Invoice item : 2, quantity: 4
Invoice item : 3, quantity: 7
In standard extractor (0SRM_TD_IV) RSA3 : exactly same as SRM data.
In standard DSO (0SRIV_D3) : only invoice number and invoice item one is present, which suppose to be deleted in BI.
Invoice number: 50001168
Invoice item : 1, quantity: 30
When I did the full repair for this invoice number from SRM. I got all the 3 invoice items. It did not overwrite invoice item 1, which is deleted in SRM. the way it works in SRM is, it didn't delete the invoice item but flaged with the deletion indicator x.
Know every thing look good up to extractor RSA3. what should I do know to fix this issue? I see that we don't have tranformation rules in BI 7.0 insted we are using trnasfer rules and update rule. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Chandra

Hi Chandu,
The way I understand your issue is that,
when you do a full upload, you get the information correctly in RSA3 and DSO.
when you run a delta, you are not getting all the line items.
1) Please check whether there are any relevant SAP notes for this extractor to fix this delta issue.
2) Please check whether there is any code in the update rule or transfer rule that deletes the missing line item
Thanks,
Krishnan

How do I replace someone else's Mac ID with my own? Bought iPhone second hand. Previous owner re-set the phone but his ICloud account stayed on now my phone. He uses his macID on his new iPhone now?? Any ideas, as this issue is blocking my access to iTune

How do I replace someone else's Mac ID with my own?
Bought iPhone second hand on TradeMe.
Previous owner re-set the phone but his ICloud account stayed on now my phone. He uses his AppleID on his new iPhone now and, understandably, does not want to give me his password. Any ideas?? Please.
This issue is blocking my access to iTunes and any other file from my home computer. It keeps on telling me that I have to autorise my computer to pass on files, yet, it seems, for all this to happen, I need to get logged in through the phone's Apple ID. This of course is different to my one on my computer - and I have no password for it.
This phone is not stolen!! I payed still a fair bit for it. Am still in contact with the previous owner. He doesn't know how to fix the problem either.
Would appreciate any suggestion ????
Thanks
SamSings

Settings>general>resets>erase all content and settings.
That will put it back to its out of the box state. Set it up with your own apple Id.

I don't know if this is the right section but I experience the following issue with Adobe Acrobat Pro XI installed on Windows 8.1. When I start Acrobat the related window opens normally but, after some scroll up and down along the document, it blocks, Acr

I don't know if this is the right section but I experience the following issue with Adobe Acrobat Pro XI installed on Windows 8.1. When I start Acrobat the related window opens normally but, after some scroll up and down along the document, it blocks, Acrobat doesn't respond to any command I can give and, in place of the pointer arrow, a vertical bar, as the one of the text editor appears. The only way I can stop Acrobat is by means of the task manager. I tried to de-install and the re- install Acrobat but the behaviour is always the same. What can I do??

Have you opened Acrobat and gone to Help>Updates to get an updated install?

Block invoices for PO with no GR-based IV flag

Hello SAP experts,
I need your help with finding a way to block invoices for PO with no GR-based IV flag. At our company, we treat service POs almost the same as material POs (to avoid receipt of service entry). The only difference from material PO is that service PO does not have the flag for GR. We customized our EBP to have this done.
Now, accounting wants to automatically block all invoices associate with service POs. In this case it would be a PO with no GR. I tried LIV configuration but it is only for price, quantity and etc. I also tried blocking with IR before GR but it didn't work because there is no GR.
Is there a way to achive automatic invoice block in this case?
Appreciate your help.
-AT-

Hi Annie,
if the configuration doesn't help you enough, you would have to add some custom logic after the invoice has been created.
Technically speaking, I believe there exists a business add-in (BAdI) where you could enter a piece of code which would after the invoice creation check the GR and block it if appropriate. Another implementation option would be a mini-workflow - there you would have a step which checks the GR existence and blocks the invoice.
Hope this helps, I suggest talking to your local abap consultant for more details,
-Mikko

Query-blocked Invoices for Quality per mat with the total quantity in QI

Hello,
We need to create a query for blocked Invoices in Quality summarized per materialcode together with the total quantity in Quality Inspection blocked stock.
As starting point I've used the table RBKP_BLOCKED and linked it with RSEG from which I'm checking the quality block.
From which table should I retrieve the qty in QI blocked stock?
Thanks,
Andrei J

since ur report is depending on LIV's on block due to quality inspection is pending, better take the quantity from MKPF passing document number (GR number) and year of the document.
Taking stock from MARD table will result is total mis match since this table holds stock position of plant and storage lcoation.
Thanks & regards
AHP

Dunning issue with payment block

Hi Experts,
I am currently having an issue with Dunning process.
-> In SAP standard behaviour, if we have a document which has a payment block associated to it,will it be dunned ?
My issue is that whenever I have a document which has a payment block associated to it, it is being dunned and I dont want this.
Could you please advise me on how to proceed ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi SDNer,
Thanks for the confirmation.
But the thing is that I can not put a Dunning Block to it.
The requirement is that when there is a payment block associated to a document, it should not be dunned.
Is there any configuration that needs to be done or any Enhancement ?
Thanks.

Web Template Nav Block issue with a characteristic

Hi folks,
We have an issue with one of our web templates. In one of the navigation blocks there are some characteristics, for example, some are like as below.
G/L Account
Asset
Cost Center
Order
Network
WBS Element
Cost Center (Accoung string -correct object)
Sales document
The second object from bottom supposed to show as 'Account String' since the char is accounting string itself, insted, it is showing as Cost Center which is not correct.
The web template has 'personalization' checked. It is based on a BEx query.
This issue is happening with one user id. For other users (using their logon credentials), it is showing correctly.
I really appreciate any inputs.
Thanks.
G.

Suman,
The parameter ID column is blank for this user.
However, the same query displays same for other users.
By the way, we are on BW 3.5 now.
Thanks for your input.
RK

Issue with VC/2 - not fetching the invoice details

Hi All,
We have an issue with TCode VC/2 in ECC 6. This is not fetching( not showing) the Invoice documents under the header "Last SD Documents".
It is fetching the sales documents like orders, credit memo/debit memo requests but not the invoice documents.
PLease help on this.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Harini Kesani on Jan 12, 2010 8:25 PM

Is it possible that 'last SD document' means 'last sales document', not 'last billing document'? Unfortunately, I'm unable to confirm - we don't use this transaction. You can also check what tables are used in this transaction (get help from an ABAPer or Basis) and then check if there is correct data in those tables. It might be using info structures or index tables, which may need to be populated first.

Incase of GR with Blocked Stock automatic blocking of MIRO (Vendor Invoice)

Dear Experts,
If we are making a GR with blocked stock, i.e. the material is not open for consumption as this is under inspection, system will not stopping to make vendor invoice against the PO(GR Qty).
If the GR is under blocked stock how automatically system will not allow us to make MIRO or MIR7(Vendor Invoicing),
Please advise,
Regards,
Alok Parida

Dear Mr Manohar,
In the QM View - QM Control Key below keys are found.
Which one is to be selected for blocking Vendor Invoice Posting in case of Goods are under Quality Inspection.
0000     No active functions, info message
0001     Delivery release
0002     Delivery release, tech. delivery terms
0003     Delivery release, QA agreement
0004     Del. release, tech.del terms, QA agreem.
0005     Delivery release, certificate
0006     Del. rel,TechDelT,QA agreement,certif.
0007     Del. release, invoice block
8888     Del. block inactive
9999     All functions active with error message
Regards,
Alok

Issue with blocked invoices.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for