Issue with Condition dependent PO output

Hi,
We're implementing Extended classic version for SRM 5.0.
As part of the output determination, we need to determine 2 print outputs for Purchase orders. We have 2 purchase organizations and both of them need to have 2 different smartforms for the print. So, we're designing 2 different smartforms. In order to assign the smartforms as per the purchasing org, I've used "Condition dependent output" in IMG settings. But whenever I try to print, it picks up the standard form from the IMG node "Define actions for Document Output" where the standard form is maintained. We did not maintain the custom form in this node because we have 2 forms for print.
I would like the program to pick up the custom form maintained in " Condition dependent document output".
I understand that we could use the BADI alternatively. But any help in resolving this problem through the configuration is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Lakshmi

Hi,
Pls implement the badi "BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF".
For sample code/pointers,see the foll links;
Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
Re: Smartform display
Re: Add a Printer ? -> LP01
Re: Condition Dependent Document Output
Re: Add a Printer ? -> LP01
sending Smart form to Printer in SRM
Re: SRM PO's to be printed out with the PO
BR,
Disha.

Similar Messages

Issue with Condition dependent PO output in SRM 4.0

Thought I am using Condition-Dependent Purchase Order Output
The PO preivew still picks up the form which is defined under Define Actions for Purchase Order Output
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Have a look at the following note:
Note 968534 - Incorrect determination of conditions on the BOR object
Thanks,
Pradeep

Condition Dependent PO output

Hi Friends,
I have maintained the PO output condition as 'Processing using Selection Report' in
(IMG): SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Set Output Actions and Output Format->Define Actions for Purchase Order Output.
In (IMG): SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Set Output Actions and Output Format->Condition-Dependent Purchase Order Output, I have maintained the
Processing Time as 'Processing when saving the document' for e-mail output.
But currently my system is not taking the Processing time ''Processing when saving the document' which I maintained in Condition Dependent PO output. It is taking the
value 'Processing using Selection Report' which I maintained in Define Actions for Purchase Order Output.
So when my PO is ordered the output status will be "Not Processed' at first and then I have to manually process it or run the selection report to process it.
I want the Po output to be "Successfully Procssed" immediately after the PO is ordered with my current settings. Is that possible? Kindly help me with this issue.
Thanks in Advance...
Best Regards,
Vidya

Hi,
Pls implement the badi "BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF".
For sample code/pointers,see the foll links;
Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
Re: How to change default smartform triggered while printing for shopping cart
Re: Smartform display
Re: Add a Printer ? -> LP01
Re: Condition Dependent Document Output
Re: Add a Printer ? -> LP01
sending Smart form to Printer in SRM
Re: SRM PO's to be printed out with the PO
BR,
Disha.

Condition Dependent Document Output

Hello, all
Please help me,
We have extended classic scenario in SRM 5.0.
May I to use Condition Dependent Document Output in Spro
if I need to print 2 smartforms for one purchase order?
Best regards,
Guzal

Hello, all
I'm solved a question. I'm used the BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF.
Best regards,
Guzal

Issue with "timing" in Message output of Change PO

Dear Experts,
For change PO, We are facing issue with the Timing in message output of PO.
i.e, For example when we create a PO - the timing in message output is "1"
after executing ME9F, the message turns GREEN - and still the timing is 1.
Change PO : NOW WHEN WE CHANGE A PO, a new entry of Message output appears in "YELLOW"
Here is the issue - Now when we manually change the timing from "3" to "4", initially it appear's "4",
but if u refer the below screenshot - once we save the application i turns back to 3.
any idea - why this is happening.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rohit

Hi,
1st make sure which Dispatch time you want for your PO layout and restrict changing dispatch time manually in PO.
Now use t.code:NACE, with application EF for your PO message type, Keep Dispatch time 4 in ‘Default values’ TAB and select check of “CannotBeChanged” in Basis Data TAB and save.
Maintain message condition record in t.code:MN04 with PO message type and keep Dispatch time 4.
Now create PO , try to change Dispatch time and see how system behave!
Regards,
Biju K

Issue with Saving the Query output data in Excel format

Hi,
Recnetly we had upgraded from 4.6c to ECC 6.0.
In ECc 6.0 environment, when user try to export the query output , we are getting only XML option to save the data.
But user want to save the data in EXcel format, he was able to do that in 4.6C.
pleas eprovide some inputs, on this issue.
Thanks,
Sanketh.

I cannot for the life of me imagine, why a link to a post in the 'Business One Forum' where one uses ODBC to transfer query-data to MicroSoft Excel is of relevance to the OPs question, even if the same is not a security issue.
Never mind. [note 40155|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/402155] deals with various symptoms in the ALV-Excel combination as as of release 4.6C. There are various others, mostly in components BC-SRV-ALV and BC-ABA-LI - also: I remember that when we upgraded from 4.5B to 4.7C there was an issue with Excel-templates -> the solution was in the release notes somewhere. So, in addition to SMP you might want to check the release notes and/or upgrade guide for solutions.
And yes, moderators ... this is not a security issue, this should go to ECC-Applications/Upgrade.

Issue with Customizing Condition-Dependent Document Output

Hello gurus!
When we print a Bid Invitation on SRM menubar web "Output Control", Sap creates three new spool orders.
The first contains the output format of our SmartForm ZBBP_BID INVITATION.
The second contains the format of a external mail.
And the third, contains both (the two previous orders in a single spool).
We need to change some parameters to print smartform and to store email content in a two spools maximum. Further, in the future will have to change email body and subject, and print inmediatly in the local printer. We don't know how to do anything, although we have tried several things.
What can we do? Any idea?
Thank you in advance. Hugs!!

Hello, all
I'm solved a question. I'm used the BADI BBP_OUTPUT_CHANGE_SF.
Best regards,
Guzal

Issue with fixed point number output from 9219 module for full bridge measurement (cRIO/FPGA)

Hi,
I have a question regarding the fixed point output acquired from a 9219 module (in FPGA on a cRIO) when setup to acquire a strain measurement (full bridge).
Software: Labview 2009
Hardware: cRIO-9012 (NI-RIO 3.2.1), NI-9219 module
The 9219 module is configured in the project as follow:
Ch0: Full-Bridge +/- 7.8mV/V
Ch1: Voltage +/- 4V
Ch2: Voltage +/- 15V
Ch3: Voltage +/- 60V
The calibration mode is 'Calibrated' so the FPGA outputs fixed point numbers.
My issue is that the precision of the fixed point number for Ch0 (strain) is "(fixed point <+/-32,-1>[-2.5e1,2.5e1]:1.16e-10)", which indicates that the fixed point number is a value between +/- 0.25 and not the +7.8mV/V as I expected?
The fixed point number does not change in precision whether the range for the strain measurement is set at +/- 7.8mV/V or +/-64mV/V (the two available options).
As the fixed point number doesn't change precision I'm assuming that changing the range of the strain measurement changes the resolution of the acquired number? And as such I will need to perform additional scaling on the fixed point number to convert it to the expected range?
There is no mention of scaling of the voltage or strain measurements mentioned in any documentation or examples, with the only scaling example provided for the thermocouple measurements.
Any help/clarification is much appreciated.
Regards,
Mike

Hello Mike,
Hopefully I can help clarify some of the behavior you are seeing.
My issue is that the precision of the fixed point number for Ch0 (strain) is "(fixed point <+/-32,-1>[-2.5e1,2.5e1]:1.16e-10)", which indicates that the fixed point number is a value between +/- 0.25 and not the +7.8mV/V as I expected?
For calibrated values on the FPGA VI, the returned data is a Voltage measurement, not a directly calculated strain value. Based on the specified ranges for the 9219 in a Full bridge configuration, 250 mV will encompass all possible input values, at the module provided excitation (2-2.7V dependent on the sensor gage resistance).
The fixed point number does not change in precision whether the range for the strain measurement is set at +/- 7.8mV/V or +/-64mV/V (the two available options).
As you may notice from the fix-point definition, the fixed point data contains 32-bit precision which is larger than the acquired precision of 24-bits provided by the 9219. The fixed point data-type is coded to accept input encompassing both the range and precision of the instrument; such that, no additional coercion of the input data values is required based on user-defined software settings, i.e. the bridge sensitivities +/- 7.8mV/V or +/-64mV/V.
As the fixed point number doesn't change precision I'm assuming that changing the range of the strain measurement changes the resolution of the acquired number? And as such I will need to perform additional scaling on the fixed point number to convert it to the expected range?
The documentation does not clearly define that by varying the discrete levels of strain input (+/- 7.8mV/V or +/-64mV/V) the range of the ADC on the module is also adjusted. I am working to follow up further on this topic, to provide a clarification on the module documentation. As for scaling, the voltage values acquired regardless of the ADC resolution will still be related strain via the bridge sensitivity. The resolution of the ADC will simply define the smallest measurable change in the strain value.
There is no mention of scaling of the voltage or strain measurements mentioned in any documentation or examples, with the only scaling example provided for the thermocouple measurements.
For converting the acquired voltage values to a strain measurement, I would recommend the documentation linked here for a detailed explanation on strain calculation. Often, users will forward the acquired voltage data as fixed point values through a DMA FIFO to the RT controller on the Compact RIO; such that, they may handle conversion from voltage to strain using floating point math in real-time.
I hopes these responses provided a bit of clarity. I will continue to work to provide additional information on the 9219 specification information. Please post back any further questions.
Cheers!
Edit: Forgot to add the link.
Message Edited by Pcorcs on 04-14-2010 04:55 PM
Patrick Corcoran
Application Engineering Specialist | Control
National Instruments

Issue with conditional breaks

Hi Experts,
I am working on conditoinal breaks in adobe.
My requirement is: For a delivery item if i have 3 batched i have to print 3 forms with item data. Here the data of one batch can flow into multiple pages I had applied a conditional break on batch field at the item level of the table(designed with dragging the table into the layout.). this form contains Batch at header and footer. When the data fits in one page conditional breaks are working fine and i am getting 3 forms in the same spool as desired. But when there is more item data conditional breaks are not working properly.
Issue like item data over flow on the footer and batches are not showing up properly according to the page breaks.
Please help on this issue.
Thanks,
Anil

Guys, Tell me if my question was not clear or need further information.

Issue with condition editor in integration process

Hi,
Now there is the chance to use this feature for the first time.
Seems to be very easy.... No, it isnt!
Variable RETURN (type string) referencing to a field of a message structure is used for this condition:
RETURN!="I001"
So, if the variable does not contain the string I001 the process should use the exception path.
Ok, easy! This works!
But now I have this case to solve with the condition editor.
If the variable does not contain the string I001 OR E002 the process should use the exception path.
So my condition looks like this now:
RETURN!="I001"|RETURN!="E001"
=> If return is NOT I001 OR Return is NOT E001....
Result: semantical check is OK but the process always chooses the exception path now.
Oh, why this?
An alternative RETURN!=("I001"|"E001") does not pass the semantic check.
So I am missing ideas now how to write down the condition for my switch step
as this issue seems to be not discussed in any thread here.
Any help with this strange feature is really appreciated!
Best regards
Dirk

Hi Dirk,
=> If return is NOT I001 OR Return is NOT E001....
for me, your logic is wrong, what you need for your exception receiver is :
=> If return is NOT I001 AND Return is NOT E001....
NON (a OR b) <=> (NON a) AND (NON b).
so for your receiver_ok, you have to use the opposite: so the solution providen by Ramesh, and so to ahve two receiver lines like that:
(Result = "l001" OR Result ="E0011" ) ==> Receiver_ok
<blank_condition (*)> ==> Receiver_Exception
(*) all condition which does not respect the 1st ones: Result = "l001" OR Result ="E0011".
regards.
Mickael

Condition Dependant Document Output in SRM 5.0

Hi,
My requirement is to conditionally suppress the sending of the PO output if the action profile type is MethodCall (XML) and the initial PO send completed successfully. This means that on any subsequent change to a PO for this profile type, do not send the output.
If I create a start condition for the Method Call process type, the output record is created but not sent as expected.
Because the BOR object BUS2201 doesnu2019t have the required attributes to meet my requirement, I extended it by adding the version_no attribute.
When testing BUS2201 via SWO1, the custom attribute is visible and populated. When I create the desired condition, the custom attribute is available for selection. When I create the PO the system sends the XML output. Then when I subsequently change it, the system still sends the output. Itu2019s as if itu2019s not recognizing the custom attribute in the decision to determine whether to process the send action.
Has anyone successfully implemented this type of solution?
Thanks,
Jerry Martinek

The solution to conditionaly suppress the PO output generation using a custom attribute seems to be working. Don't know why but would guess that it might have been somekind of a buffering issue as it worked the next day.

Issue with sound effects preference output (no sound)

HI,
Weird issue, my macbook will play any music or sound except sound effects like moving items to the trash or when something is done copying to my external drive.
I checked the sound preferences and everything seems right.
My Sound Effects panel works and shows the list of sounds.
"Play alerts and sound effects through:" is there but that list is greyed out (maybe because only one option?). It does say internal speakers
My Output is through the internal speakers and works fine.
I thought the problem might have been an external pair of speakers I had used. I hooked them up and selected the internal speakers from the menu and then disconnected the speakers but still silence.
I like the audio feedback especially with multitasking. Since all other audio plays fine it's not the internal speaker.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Phillyman
A typo in the title Message was edited by: Phillyman

HI Carolyn,
Thanks for your reply! The weird thing is that this is a brand new system (about a month old). On my other systems I do have some audio software but I've hardly touched this system. I'm pretty sure it once did give me audio feedback. All the boxes are checked in the sound effects panel (including the play user interface sound effects).
My other systems all have external speakers and I've been too lazy to crawl under the tables and disconnect them. But here my followup. If you have nothing connected is the sound effects through menu: greyed out if you only have one source? In my case it is and I think that has something to do with my problem.
thanks for any and all help,
Phillyman
posted the message while still in the middle of it. Message was edited by: Phillyman

Issue with conditional formatting in XML publisher report

Hi All,
I am working on a XML report where in I am required to use conditional formatting to highlight changes, if there is change in any of the column value. The condition is required to be implemented on a text column as well as a number column. I have tried to use the conditional formatting available in the BI Publisher Release 10.1.3.2, wherein I have compared the two columns, and when they are not equal to, then formatting should change to red color; but the same is not working in the excel output.
Can anybody help here?
Thanks,
Nitin

Cross conditional formatting ie formatting based on some other column is not supported in pivot view.
There are some workaround.See if that helps
http://www.obinotes.com/2010/03/pivot-view-conditional-formatting-in.html
Regards,
Sandeep

Issue with At selection-screen output

Hi,
I tried in SDn to find suitable thread atlast i am creating query here.
My requirement is: i have two radiobuttons.
when i click first radiobutton it hasto show one selection screen it contains pernr and bukrs
when i click second radiobutton it has to show second selection screen . This screen includes personnel area and Wage type
Thanks,
Maheedhar

Use "AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT" and distinguish them with "MODIF ID"
Code flows like this:
PARAMETERS r_online RADIOBUTTON GROUP g1
                     USER-COMMAND ex DEFAULT 'X'.
PARAMETERS r_batch RADIOBUTTON GROUP g1.
PARAMETERS r_down RADIOBUTTON GROUP g1.
PARAMETER: p_bukrs LIKE t024e-bukrs OBLIGATORY
                   DEFAULT 'US60'.
SELECT-OPTIONS: s_werks FOR marc-werks.
PARAMETER: p_vari TYPE slis_vari MODIF ID md5.
PARAMETERS: p_a_file LIKE rlgrap-filename
                     DEFAULT '/transfer/us6/ZUS6MM04_MatPlt'
                     MODIF ID md2.
PARAMETERS: p_h_file LIKE rlgrap-filename
                     DEFAULT '/transfer/us6/ZUS6MM04_MatPlt_HDR'
                     MODIF ID md2.
PARAMETERS: p_hfile1 LIKE rlgrap-filename
                     DEFAULT '/transfer/us6/ZUS6MM04_MatPlt_HDR'
                     MODIF ID md3.
PARAMETERS: p_hfile2 LIKE rlgrap-filename
                     default 'C:\Transfer\US6\ZUS6MM04_MatPlt_HDR.txt'
                     MODIF ID md4.
* AT SELECTION-SCREEN EVENTS
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT.
PERFORM modify_screen.
*&      Form MODIFY_SCREEN
FORM modify_screen .
LOOP AT SCREEN.
    IF r_online = 'X'.
      IF screen-group1 = 'MD3' OR
         screen-group1 = 'MD4' OR
         screen-group1 = 'MD2'.
        screen-active = '0'.
      ENDIF.
    ELSEIF r_batch = 'X'.
      IF screen-group1 = 'MD3' OR
         screen-group1 = 'MD4' OR
        screen-group1 = 'MD5'.
        screen-active = '0'.
      ENDIF.
    ELSEIF r_down = 'X'.
      IF screen-group1 = 'MD2' OR
        screen-group1 = 'MD5'.
        screen-active = '0'.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                    " MODIFY_SCREEN

Issue with condition in Query

Hi,
I have report on a cube which when execute vit all main characteristics(highest level char[plant] to lowest level[material] chars) like plant, external-material grp, material type, project-plant and material the report vil come vit correct values , wen v remove the lowest level ie., material the overall result is changing.
     There is a condition for Godown Quantity(godown qty notequalto 0)
    Because of the condition on godown qty the overall result is changing.
like:
qty 61-120amt 61-120qty >120----amt >120
10936.06-766957.91-1955762.54--725613332.2(overall-results)
when we drill down are remove drill down any characteristic then some value(6422) of amt61-120 days is shifting to amt>120days,this happening also for qty.
like:
10934.66760535.291955763.94---725619755(overall-results)
    so i removed the condition and executed the report, here wat ever char v remove and wat ever char v drill down no effect to over all result means it vil remain unchange.
   But asking for no zero values for Godown quantity.
Help me in this....
Thanks in Advance,
Chaitu.
Edited by: chaithu218 on Jun 6, 2011 5:09 PM

Hi,
user555994 wrote:
Hello Lee,
thanks for your reply.
But what is B?I think Lee meant to name the in-line view "B", like this:
SELECT b.app_req_id
FROM (SELECT   a.app_req_id,
                COUNT(*) cnt       -- or maybe COUNT (DISTINCT a.class_symbol)
       FROM     app_req a
       WHERE    a.class_symbol IN ('MBA', 'BTECH', 'BBA', 'SENIOR SECONDARY', 'SECONDARY')
       GROUP BY a.app_req_id) b     -- Alias added here
WHERE b.cnt = 5
;You don't really need either alias. In fact, you don't need the sub-query: the query below is equivalent to the one above:
SELECT    app_req_id
FROM      app_req
WHERE     class_symbol     IN ('MBA', 'BTECH', 'BBA', 'SENIOR SECONDARY', 'SECONDARY')
GROUP BY app_req_id
HAVING    COUNT (*)           -- or maybe COUNT (DISTINCT class_symbol)
                 = 5
;If the combination (app_req_id, class_symbol) is not unique, then use "COUNT (DISTINT class_symbol)" instead of "COUNT (*)".
There is only 1 table i am reffering to and need to get the ID where values matches in other column. Other column can have the values as that of MBA,BTECH,BBA,SENIOR SECONDARY and SECONDARY.
I don't want to use query as -
Select APP_REQ_ID FROM app_req where class_symbol in ('MBA', 'BTECH', 'BBA', 'SENIOR SECONDARY', 'SECONDARY')
As this will be with either of the match found. I want where all of the match found.That's what the condition "WHERE b.cnt = 5" in the main query is for.
>
Kindly help.If the query above is not doing what you want, then post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements), and the results you want from that data. Point out where the query above is getting the wrong results, and explain, with spoecific examples, how to get the right results in those places.

Issue with Condition dependent PO output

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for