Issue with Landscape table in Portrait Page

Hi All,
I have requirement where i need have a table that should be in the landscape format..like the output should display like this.
Jan Feb Jun
100 20 30
Only the Month and Value are coming from the Query..So how can i achieve this in Rtf..
Please help..
Thanks
Bharat

You can use for-each@column and for-each@cell

Similar Messages

Issues with Advance Table Add Row New Row not work in some scenarios.

Hi,
Wondering if there's any issue with Advanced Tables where it does not create any rows. I don't know if anyone tried this or not. I have one OA Page with Advanced Table and a button that when clicked open a new OA Page in a POP-UP Window. The pop-up page conatins one textbox where u enter a data and this gets saved in one of the VO's transient attribute. Now on the ase page if you don't click a button to open a pop-up page you can Add New Rows in the Advanced Table by clicking Add Row Button. But as soon as you open a popup window and close it Add New Rows button doesn't work and is not creating any new rows. Basically page stops working. Both the POP-UP and the base page share the same AM but have different controllers.
POP-UP page is a custom page that I open giving the Destination URI value in the button item and target frame _blank.
I even tried creating rows programmatically for Advance Table but this too doesn't work once u open a pop-up. Also I have used pageContext.putTransactionValue in the pop-up page and am checking and removing this in the base page.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

anyone

Issue with displaying summary in the Page Bottom

Hi Friends,
I have an issue with displaying summary in the page bottom. for this i am using command BOTTOM and ENDBOTTOM in Main Window.
I designed 2 pages are First and Next, in the first it displays PO Header details and Item details in the Main window and also Item details continuious in the Next Page also.
If the lines are enough in Bottom then it displays the summary. But if the lines are not enough in bottom then it does not trigger the new page, so that it doesn't displays the Summary in Bottom.
for ex: Total lines of the page 50 and Bottom required 15 lines. In the next page contains upto 35 lines, it triggers the Bottom.
But if the lines are more than 35 and below than 50, it does not trigger the new page so that it does not shows the bottom.
Please help me on the same, this is very urgent.I will give a rewatrd if it is helful.
Regards,
Subbarao

HI,
Try with printing the bottom data with Protect and ENDPROTECT along with your Bottom and endbottom.
Eg: Protect
bottom
text
endbottom
endprotect.
Regards,
Venkatesh

Hello Gurus..... ISSUE with child Table update

I have an issue with child table update
I have created a GTC with one parent table and two child tables. I'm able to update the parent table and the values are found in db, but the ISSUE is the child Table values are not updating the db.
please give me a solution
regards
Srikanth

If you are keeping referential integrity in the database, not in the application, it is easy to find the child and parent tables. Here is a quick and dirty query. You can join this to dba_cons_columns to find out on which columns the referential constraints are defined. This lists all child-parent table including SYS and SYSTEM users. You can run this for specific users of course.
select cons1.owner child_owner,cons1.table_name child_table,
cons2.owner parent_owner,cons2.table_name parent_table
from dba_constraints cons1,dba_constraints cons2
where cons1.constraint_type='R'
and cons1.r_constraint_name=cons2.constraint_name;

Auto adjustment of page orientation causes printing issues with documents that have a page width greater than its page height.

Hi,
Since an upgrade from Word 2003 to Word 2010, we are experiencing printing issues with certain
documents that have a page width greater than its page height.
In Word 2003, it was no problem to set the page width greater than the page height while setting the page orientation to "portrait".
In Word 2010, this seems impossible: despite leaving the page orientation to "portrait", if one changes the page width/height as stated,
Word 2010 automatically adjusts the orientation to "landscape". Resetting the orientation to "portrait" will flip the page's width/heigth settings.
This behaviour causes printing problems: the page prints out 90° rotated.
I do not believe this is a printer driver issue: I tried several different printer drivers, and all give the same (bad) result. Setting the printer driver's page orientation settings (before printing) makes no difference, as
Word 2010 seems to force the page orientation settings.
Inserting the documents 90° rotated is not an option, since it causes problems with the printing margins.
This is very annoying, since we have to print official documents of a municipality (driver's licences).
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Regards,
Laurent Grandgaignage
Sysadmin Gemeentebestuur Stabroek, Belgium

Hi
Thank you for using
Microsoft Office for IT Professionals Forums.
From your description, we can follow these steps to test this issue
Step 1: Repair Office 2010
1.
Click
Start, and then click Control Panel.
2.
Click
Programs and Features.
3.
Click the
Office 2010 program that you want to repair, and then click
Change.
4.
Click
Repair, and then click Continue. You might need to restart your computer after the repair is complete.
Step 2:
Rename the global template (Normal.dotm)Follow the steps for the operating system that you are using:
Windows Vista and Windows 7
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start.
c)
In the
Start Search box, type the following text, and then press
ENTER:
1.
%userprofile%\appdata\roaming\microsoft\templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
Microsoft Windows XP
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start, and then click Run.
c)
In the
Open box, type the following text, and then press ENTER:
%userprofile%\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
f)
Close Windows Explorer.
How to troubleshoot print failures in Word 2010, Word 2007, and Word 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826845
Please take your time to try the suggestions and let me know the results at your earliest convenience. If anything is unclear or if there is anything
I can do for you, please feel free to let me know.
Hope that helps.
Sincerely
William Zhou CHNPlease remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Duplex printing issues with landscape orientation

I have read through all of the previous questions, and can't seem to resolve my problem here.
I am using Acrobat 8 Professional (8.2.2). I have created a PDF from a Powerpoint presentation. I need to be able to send this to someone else and have them view it on screen with the correct orientation, and also duplex print it correctly, as all of our company printers default to duplex printing (to save paper). However, since the person who prints it is going to staple it in the upper left hand corner, it really needs to be duplexed to open along the left edge (the short edge of the paper).
When I first bring up the print screen the document has the incorrect orientation; i.e. it shows a thumbnail of an 8.5 x 11" page in portrait orientation, and my content is reduced in size to fit the 8.5 width. I think this is really the issue at hand--for some reason, even though the page is set up in Powerpoint as a 8.5x11 landscape oriented document, when it exports to the PDF format, that orientation doesn't hold.
Anyway, it seems that no matter what settings I try to adjust, it doesn't seem to work. I have toggled "Auto-Rotate and Center," I have toggled the duplex settings in the PDF document properties. I have toggled the duplex print settings on my printer driver between "Open to Left" and "Open to Top." None of it seems to make any difference in the final printout--basically what comes out of my printer is a document that is rotated to print out as if it was a portrait page, and is bound on the left edge (so each second page is printed upside down, when I am looking at it in landscape orientation).
The only work-arounds I can think of would be to rotate every other page in the PDF so that when it printed it printed correctly. However, then the PDF would not be readable on the screen. I could generate two separate versions of the PDF, one marked for print, and the other for viewing--but that is a real waste.
Does anyone have any suggestions here? I am looking for a way either to get the PDF software to "understand" that this document is a landscape document from the get-go (then it SHOULD work to duplex print correctly with the "Open to Left" setting), or maybe create a custom print setting for this document that allows me to rotate every other page as it is printed, but that doesn't rotate the pages on the screen.
I hope this is all clear...and that someone can offer some advice.
Thanks!
Melise
P.S. Just in case it makes any difference, I am running Windows XP Professional and am using the Microsoft Office 2007 software package. Because the company has multiple different printers throughout the company, I need a solution that will work without regards to the specific printer driver.

I am having the exact same issue. The setting of "Auto-Rotate and Center" has no affect.
Do I have to rotate the odd pages 180 so they are upside down in the PDF, but print correctly?
I am using Acrobat 9 Pro V. 9.3.3 in Win 7 Pro 64, to HP CP6015XH (colour laser).

Strange issue with ADF table in chrome browser

I have ADF table which should display 23 rows, but only 20 rows are visible in chrome browser, but other browsers like IE, firefox displays the 23 rows correctly. I have used default ADF table with Drag&drop behaviour in this table. All the 23 rows exported correctly to Excel with export to Excel behaviour and inspect page source also shows all the rows in Chrome browser, but display in the adf is only problem in chrome browser. We're having a production issue with this, any ideas are appreciated.
Thanks,
Surya

Hi All,
Is this issue fixed yet? There are a couple of threads reporting this issue and the original thread has been Archived. It is a real issue, and it remains an issue. The Chrome browser cuts off the last row of a table in the display. IE displays the row correctly. I am working with JDev 12.1.2 and I am building an application using ADF Tables. Without exception, on every page that has one, the last row of the table is cut off from display in a very ugly way and you cannot scroll down to display the full row. I have tried wrapping the table in a Panel Collection - same result, I have tried setting the height of the table - same result. I have tried surrounding the table with a PanelGroupLayout component (layout set to scroll) - same result. I have even tried surrounding the table with a PanelHeaderComponent component, Type set to both default and Stretch - yes, you guessed it, same result! I've even put the table in the middle of a PanelStretchLayout component - but the last row is always cut off.
This should be easy for you to reproduce, just drop a data control on a ADF page and select a table. When you view it in the Chrome browser and you will see what I'm talking about. I'm using Google Chrome version 31.0.1650.63 m.
I have experimented with AFStretchWidth and AutoHeightRows (as suggested by previous threads), nothing seems to work.
Here's another suggestion, if the forum would allow you to insert an image, I could actually show you what I'm talking about. Food for thought perhaps?
Best regards,
Nigel
"Life's too short not to use ADF"

Problems with 2 tables on same page (in tabs)

i have two data tables bound to different data providers on a page
the tables are presented in two of the tabs of a 5 tab tabset
both tables bind to the data, refresh etc fine. i can customise the data, sort the tables, paginate and so on. no problems.
however, both tables have an edit and a delete button. on table 1 these buttons work fine and fire the appropriate event handlers. on table 2 the buttons i have added to the second table don't seem to fire any event when they are clicked - i have run in debug mode and nothing is happening when the buttons are clicked at any point in the code that i can find
has anyone had similar problems - anyone got any suggestions
thanks
ben

Thanks Misha, for the help
I actually ended up tracing it back to an issue with the data provider - essentially, I had changes some of the table structure behind the data provider and this seemed to cause the table in question to not fire the button events - it seemed that because part of the compound primary key was not selected in the data provider's source rowset, the provider could not get a row key and therefore the events did not fire - i have it working now though after modifying the backing query
thanks again

Performance issues with pipelined table functions

I am testing pipelined table functions to be able to re-use the base_query function. Contrary to my understanding, the with_pipeline procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy no_pipeline procedure. Am I missing something? The processor function is from [url http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=429]improving performance with pipelined table functions .
Edit: The underlying query returns 500,000 rows in about 3 minutes. So there are are no performance issues with the query itself.
Many thanks in advance.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pipeline_example
IS
 TYPE resultset_typ IS REF CURSOR;
 TYPE row_typ IS RECORD (colC VARCHAR2(200), colD VARCHAR2(200), colE VARCHAR2(200));
 TYPE table_typ IS TABLE OF row_typ;
 FUNCTION base_query (argA IN VARCHAR2, argB IN VARCHAR2)
 RETURN resultset_typ;
 c_default_limit CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := 100;
 FUNCTION processor (
 p_source_data IN resultset_typ,
 p_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT c_default_limit)
 RETURN table_typ
 PIPELINED
 PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION p_source_data BY ANY);
 PROCEDURE with_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ);
 PROCEDURE no_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ);
END pipeline_example;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY pipeline_example
IS
 FUNCTION base_query (argA IN VARCHAR2, argB IN VARCHAR2)
 RETURN resultset_typ
 IS
 o_resultset resultset_typ;
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT colC, colD, colE
 FROM some_table
 WHERE colA = ArgA AND colB = argB;
 RETURN o_resultset;
 END base_query;
 FUNCTION processor (
 p_source_data IN resultset_typ,
 p_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT c_default_limit)
 RETURN table_typ
 PIPELINED
 PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION p_source_data BY ANY)
 IS
 aa_source_data table_typ;-- := table_typ ();
 BEGIN
 LOOP
 FETCH p_source_data
 BULK COLLECT INTO aa_source_data
 LIMIT p_limit_size;
 EXIT WHEN aa_source_data.COUNT = 0;
 /* Process the batch of (p_limit_size) records... */
 FOR i IN 1 .. aa_source_data.COUNT
 LOOP
 PIPE ROW (aa_source_data (i));
 END LOOP;
 END LOOP;
 CLOSE p_source_data;
 RETURN;
 END processor;
 PROCEDURE with_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ)
 IS
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(t, 5) */ colC,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD > colE AND colE != '0' THEN colD / ColE END)de,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colE > colD AND colD != '0' THEN colE / ColD END)ed,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = colE AND colD != '0' THEN '1' END) de_one,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = '0' OR colE = '0' THEN '0' END) de_zero
 FROM TABLE (processor (base_query (argA, argB),100)) t
 GROUP BY colC
 ORDER BY colC
 END with_pipeline;
 PROCEDURE no_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ)
 IS
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT colC,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD > colE AND colE != '0' THEN colD / ColE END)de,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colE > colD AND colD != '0' THEN colE / ColD END)ed,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = colE AND colD != '0' THEN 1 END) de_one,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = '0' OR colE = '0' THEN '0' END) de_zero
 FROM (SELECT colC, colD, colE
 FROM some_table
 WHERE colA = ArgA AND colB = argB)
 GROUP BY colC
 ORDER BY colC;
 END no_pipeline;
END pipeline_example;
ALTER PACKAGE pipeline_example COMPILE;Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 9:47 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 11:31 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 11:32 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 20, 2010 12:04 PM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 20, 2010 12:54 PM

Earthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the with_pipeline procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy no_pipeline procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

Issue with Multiple Tables in Report

Post Author: dwessell
CA Forum: General
Hi,
I'm using Crystal Reports 2k8.
I'm doing a report with three tables, CQ_HEADER, SO_HEADER and SALESPERSON. Both the CQ_HEADER and the SO_HEADER tables link to the SALESPERSON table via a SPN_AUTO_KEY field.
However, I always receive duplicates in my result set, due to the joins made, and I don't receive results that are valid in one table, and empty in another (Such that it only counts a CQ, if there is a SO associated with it. Here's the query that's produced by CR.
SELECT "CQ_HEADER"."CQ_NUMBER", "CQ_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE", "CQ_HEADER"."TOTAL_PRICE", "SALESPERSON"."SALESPERSON_NAME", "SO_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE", "SO_HEADER"."TOTAL_PRICE"
FROM "CQ_HEADER" "CQ_HEADER" INNER JOIN ("SO_HEADER" "SO_HEADER" INNER JOIN "SALESPERSON" "SALESPERSON" ON "SO_HEADER"."SPN_AUTO_KEY"="SALESPERSON"."SPN_AUTO_KEY") ON "CQ_HEADER"."SPN_AUTO_KEY"="SALESPERSON"."SPN_AUTO_KEY"
WHERE ("CQ_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE">={ts '2007-12-01 00:00:00'} AND "CQ_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE"<{ts '2007-12-18 00:00:00'}) AND ("SO_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE">={ts '2007-12-01 00:00:00'} AND "SO_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE"<{ts '2007-12-18 00:00:00'})
ORDER BY "SALESPERSON"."SALESPERSON_NAME"
There is no link between the SO_HEADER and the CQ_HEADER. Can anyone make a suggestion as to how I could go about structuring this such that it doesn't return duplicate values?
Thanks
David

Hey,
I understand you used Retainsameconnection property true for all the OLEDB connections you used in the package if not make sure its for all the connection including file connection as well.
Additionally, you can try to set Delayvalidation property to true for all the dataflows and control flows in the connection and try running the package for 10MB file.
I hope this will fix the intermittent failure issue you are facing with SSIS.
(Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker)
Thanks,
Atul Gaikwad.

Issue with Temp tables in SSIS 2012 with RetainSameConnection=true

Hello,
We have few packages written in 2008 and are being upgraded to 2012. Our package mostly uses temp tables during the process. During initial migration, we faced issue with handling temp table in the OLE Db destination provider and found a solution for
the same under
usage of Temp tables in SSIS 2012
Most of our packages execute fine now.
we came across a different issue recently. For one of our package, which merges 3 feeds into a temp table and then executes a stored procedure for processing, the package fails intermittently.
Below are properties of SSIS and its components, which you might be interested
* Retainsameconnection for the OLE Db connection manager set to True
* properties of OLEDB Destination
AccessMode : SQL Command
CommandTimeOut : 0
SQLCommand : Select * from #tmp
* using SSIS 2012 and SQL OLEDB Native Provider 11 (Provider=SQLNCLI11.1)
* one of the feed is 10MB
During investigation using profiler, found that though I use RetainSameConnection, I often could see that more than one SPId is used during the scope of SSIS execution and when ever this happens, package fails with below error message
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Statement(s) could not be prepared.".
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Invalid object name '#tmp'."
Now, Why SSIS uses a different SPId during its execution when RetainSameconnection is set to True (note : I have only one OLEDB connection in that package)?
To simulate the issue, Instead of 10MB file, I used a 500KB file and execute the package twice and all went fine.
Is it because of 10 MB file taking long time to process causing the time out of that OLEDB destionation forcing the SSIS to go for another connection? but remember, CommandTimeout is set to infinite(0) for that OLEDB destination.
Much appreciated your response.

Hey,
I understand you used Retainsameconnection property true for all the OLEDB connections you used in the package if not make sure its for all the connection including file connection as well.
Additionally, you can try to set Delayvalidation property to true for all the dataflows and control flows in the connection and try running the package for 10MB file.
I hope this will fix the intermittent failure issue you are facing with SSIS.
(Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker)
Thanks,
Atul Gaikwad.

Multiselection issue in advanced table on OAF page

Hi,
I have a advanced table on OA Page. To this advanced table, I had added the multi selection table action.
To the multiselect, i have attached a View Instance and a view attribute.
There is text input field in the advanced table. If user makes changes to it, an event "updateDate" fires.
In CO:
if(event.equals("updateDate")){
System.out.println("A");
String rowReference =
pageContext.getParameter(OAWebBeanConstants.EVENT_SOURCE_ROW_REFERENCE);
Serializable[] param = {rowReference} ;
am.invokeMethod("DetailsCheckBox", param);
In AM:
public void DetailsCheckBox(String rowReference) {
System.out.println("B");
oracle.jbo.Row row = findRowByRef(rowReference);
DetailsVOImpl ivo =
(DetailsVOImpl) findViewObject("DetailsVO1");
String chkbox = (String)row.getAttribute("Multiselect");
System.out.println("multiselect original: "+chkbox);
if ((chkbox == null)||(chkbox.equals("N"))){
ivo.setCurrentRow(row);
row.setAttribute("Multiselect","Y");
String chkbox1 = (String)row.getAttribute("Multiselect");
System.out.println("multiselect : "+chkbox1);
// ivo.reset();
The issue is that if there are 5 rows getting displayed in the advanced table and i make changes to any of first 4 rows, the checkbox gets checked on page but if i make changes to last row the checkbox is not checked on page, even though the statement String chkbox1 = (String)row.getAttribute("Multiselect"); returns 'Y' in AM.
Please help. Its urgent.

Hi Gyan,
Multiselect attribute is checked for Always Updateable.
and have done sop for other attributes also, dey are coming for 5th row only.
also if my VO query returns 27 rows, and advanced table displays 10 rows at a time then pnly 10th row gives this issue. It works fine even for 20th row.
Observed one more thing, if i first update any other row and then the last row, it works fine.

Rebate related issue with database table VKDFS & VBAK

Hi everybody,
I am facing the problem with the tables VKDFS and VBAK.
In my program the report has to display the details of the agrement numbers concerning to the sale or billing doucmnets later on it has to create a credit memo for that particular customer.
In the coding the program in very beging step, it is fetching all sales documents from VKDFS as per selections like following.
select        * from vkdfs into table ivkdfs
         where fktyp in r_fktyp
         and    vkorg in s_vkorg
         and    fkdat in s_fkdat
         and    kunnr in s_kunnr
         and    fkart in s_fkart
         and    vbeln in s_vbeln
         and    faksk in s_faksk
         and    vtweg in s_vtweg
         and    spart in s_spart
         and    netwr in s_netwr
         and    waerk in s_waerk.
After this whatever the sales orders fetched here, for those all again its fetching from VBAK table as following.
SVBAK[] = IVKDFS[]
select * from vbak into table ivbak
for all entries in svbak
where vbeln = svbak-vbeln
and   knuma in s_knuma
and   auart in s_auart
and   submi in s_submi
and (vbak_wtab).
So, its filtering from VBAK.
But the exact issue is that, there is one sales order which is available in VBAK but does not available in VKDFS table.
So, my program fails to display the report regarding to that agreement number.
As per my analysis I came to know that there are no entries in VKDFS table against to the sales orders in VBAK concerning agreement numbers.
VKDFS-SD index: billing initiator table.
I want to know how come this VKDFS table is updating against to VBAK table. If possible how to make this entry in that table against to the values in VBAK. But it should not effect other tables.
Please let me know the solution if you people have any .
Its an urgent and sev 1 tickets
eagerly waiting for solution or some information.
Thanks&Regards.
J.

Hi everybody,
I am facing the problem with the tables VKDFS and VBAK.
In my program the report has to display the details of the agrement numbers concerning to the sale or billing doucmnets later on it has to create a credit memo for that particular customer.
In the coding the program in very beging step, it is fetching all sales documents from VKDFS as per selections like following.
select        * from vkdfs into table ivkdfs
         where fktyp in r_fktyp
         and    vkorg in s_vkorg
         and    fkdat in s_fkdat
         and    kunnr in s_kunnr
         and    fkart in s_fkart
         and    vbeln in s_vbeln
         and    faksk in s_faksk
         and    vtweg in s_vtweg
         and    spart in s_spart
         and    netwr in s_netwr
         and    waerk in s_waerk.
After this whatever the sales orders fetched here, for those all again its fetching from VBAK table as following.
SVBAK[] = IVKDFS[]
select * from vbak into table ivbak
for all entries in svbak
where vbeln = svbak-vbeln
and   knuma in s_knuma
and   auart in s_auart
and   submi in s_submi
and (vbak_wtab).
So, its filtering from VBAK.
But the exact issue is that, there is one sales order which is available in VBAK but does not available in VKDFS table.
So, my program fails to display the report regarding to that agreement number.
As per my analysis I came to know that there are no entries in VKDFS table against to the sales orders in VBAK concerning agreement numbers.
VKDFS-SD index: billing initiator table.
I want to know how come this VKDFS table is updating against to VBAK table. If possible how to make this entry in that table against to the values in VBAK. But it should not effect other tables.
Please let me know the solution if you people have any .
Its an urgent and sev 1 tickets
eagerly waiting for solution or some information.
Thanks&Regards.
J.

SQL Query : Order By issue with HUGE Table

Hello friends,
I have been through a terrible issue with order by. I would appreciate your help. Please let me know, your input for my case:
=> if i run select query it returns result quick in some milliseconds. (sql dev. fetches 50 rows at a time)
=> if i run select query with where condition and column (say A) in where condition is even indexed and i have order by and that order by column (say B) is also indexed.
Now, here is the issue:
1. if no. of rows with that where condition can filter yielding small result set then order by works fine .. 1-5 sec which is good.
2.*if no. of rows with that where condition can filter yielding Large result set, say more than 50,000 then with order by then the wait time is exponential.... i have even waited 10+ mins to get the result back for 120,000 records.*
Is order by takes that long for 100K records ... i think something else if wrong... your pointer will really be helpful... i am very new to sql and even newer for large table case.
I am using SQL Developer Version 2.1.1.64
and Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
Thank you so much.
Edited by: 896719 on Jan 11, 2013 8:38 AM

Yes you are correct, but my concentration was on order by thing, so it will do full scan of table so i was putting that ... and was also wondering if millions of record in table should not be a issue...???
Any way for the explain plan , when just a value in the where changes there is the huge difference i want to point out too as below:
SELECT
FROM
    EES_EVT EES_EVT where APLC_EVT_CD= 'ABC' ORDER BY CRE_DTTM DESC
execution time : 0.047 sec
Plan hash value: 290548126
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |    27 | 14688 |    25   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |             |    27 | 14688 |    25   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EES_EVT     |    27 | 14688 |    24   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | XIE1EES_EVT |    27 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("APLC_EVT_CD"='ABC')
Note
   - SQL plan baseline "SYS_SQL_PLAN_6d41e6b91925c463" used for this statement
=============================================================================================
SELECT
FROM
    EES_EVT EES_EVT where APLC_EVT_CD= 'XYZ' ORDER BY CRE_DTTM DESC
execution : 898.672 sec.
Plan hash value: 290548126
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |   121K|    62M|       |   102K (1)| 00:11:02 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |             |   121K|    62M|    72M|   102K (1)| 00:11:02 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EES_EVT     |   121K|    62M|       | 88028   (1)| 00:09:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | XIE1EES_EVT |   121K|       |       |   689   (1)| 00:00:05 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("APLC_EVT_CD"='XYZ')
Note
   - SQL plan baseline "SYS_SQL_PLAN_ef5709641925c463" used for this statementAlso Note this table contains 74328 MB data in it.
Thanks

Insert performance issue with Partitioned Table.....

Hi All,
I have a performance issue during with a table which is partitioned. without table being partitioned
it ran in less time but after partition it took more than double.
1) The table was created initially without any partition and the below insert took only 27 minuts.
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:27:35.20
2) Now I re-created the table with partition(range yearly - below) and the same insert took 59 minuts.
Is there anyway i can achive the better performance during insert on this partitioned table?
[ similerly, I have another table with 50 Million records and the insert took 10 hrs without partition.
with partitioning the table, it took 18 hours... ]
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 4195045590
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 643K| 34M| | 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 643K| 34M| 2112K| 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
| 2 | VIEW | index$_join$_001 | 69534 | 1290K| | 529 (3)| 00:00:07 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
| 4 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE | 69534 | 1290K| | 181 (3)| 00:00
| 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE_IDX2 | 69534 | 1290K| | 474 (2)| 00:00
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_SISADMIN_BALANCE | 2424K| 87M| | 6413 (4)| 00:01:17 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access("A"."VENDOR_ACCT_NBR"=SUBSTR("B"."ACCOUNT_NO",1,8) AND
"A"."VENDOR_CD"="B"."COMPANY_NO")
3 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
Open C1;
Loop
Fetch C1 Bulk Collect Into C_Rectype Limit 10000;
Forall I In 1..C_Rectype.Count
Insert test
     col1,col2,col3)
Values
     val1, val2,val3);
V_Rec := V_Rec + Nvl(C_Rectype.Count,0);
Commit;
Exit When C_Rectype.Count = 0;
C_Rectype.delete;
End Loop;
End;
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:51:01.22
Edited by: user520824 on Jul 16, 2010 9:16 AM

I'm concerned about the view in step 2 and the index join in step 3. A composite index with both columns might eliminate the index join and result in fewer read operations.
If you know which partition the data is going into beforehand you can save a little bit of processing by specifying the partition (which may not be a scalable long-term solution) in the insert - I'm not 100% sure you can do this on inserts but I know you can on selects.
The APPEND hint won't help the way you are using it - the VALUES clause in an insert makes it be ignored. Where it is effective and should help you is if you can do the insert in one query - insert into/select from. If you are using the loop to avoid filling up undo/rollback you can use a bulk collect to batch the selects and commit accordingly - but don't commit more often than you have to because more frequent commits slow transactions down.
I don't think there is a nologging hint :)
So, try something like
insert /*+ hints */ into ...
Select
     A.Ing_Acct_Nbr, currency_Symbol,
     Balance_Date,     Company_No,
     Substr(Account_No,1,8) Account_No,
     Substr(Account_No,9,1) Typ_Cd ,
     Substr(Account_No,10,1) Chk_Cd,
     Td_Balance,     Sd_Balance,
     Sysdate,     'Sisadmin'
From Ideaal_Cons.Tb_Account_Master_Base A,
     Ideaal_Staging.Tb_Sisadmin_Balance B
Where A.Vendor_Acct_Nbr = Substr(B.Account_No,1,8)
   And A.Vendor_Cd = b.company_no
      ;Edited by: riedelme on Jul 16, 2010 7:42 AM

Issue with Landscape table in Portrait Page

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for