Issue with limit item  in ECC

Hi,
We are facing one issue with  Shop with Default (Limit items) in ECC.
In basic data tab, if any value is entered in any field and press enter then that value is not getting reflected in that field. But if we enter the value and click on check then that value get reflected .
The reason is BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI is not get triggered if we press only enter but it gets triggered if click on check.
We also tested in Classic case , its working fine in Calssis case.
Do you have idea for this?
Do you know any note that we have to apply for ECC?
Thanks in Advance.
Snehal

The lineitems and such will always be saved with English values. You are supposed to for display purposes, re-lookup the product in the appropriate language when you display it on the cart and what not. 
Brad Foley | www.blfoley.com |
www.darklakesoftware.com

Similar Messages

  • Contract Release value is not updated with Limit item value

    We have SRM 4.0 with ECS scenario.
    Contract are created in SRM and replicated to ERP.
    If we create PO with Service line and Limit line using contract in both of these line items, contract Release value is getting updated only with Service line item value.
    But the contract Total value is the addition of Service and Limit value of PO.
    Why Contract Release value is not getting updated with Limit item value. Please help as early as possible.

    Hi Sandeep
    Yes. there are various reasons .upon your contract incorrect status and linkage not establised / or more attachment in SRM GOA.
    what type of contract are you using? GOA or CCTR
    If it is GOA - which version of SRM and service pack ?are you in ?
    If it is a GOA , BLAREL idoc might failed to post the release value in the SRM .
    How contracts are created material / mat group ?
    to fix or understand the issue, you need to recreate the issue.
    what is the ERROR in BLAREL in SRM idoc monitoring ?

  • SC with Limit Item using Extended Classic Scenario?

    Hello,
    Can we implement SC with Limit Item using Extended Classic Scenario.
    I mention that we replicate the Product Categories from R/3 backend.
    We have tried to create a SC with Limit item, but the data on Quantity, Price and Tax is not picked up at PO level.
    Regards,
    Shaiek

    Hi
    Please try out this.
    For the time-being,
    Try de-activating all the custom BADI Implementations and check, what is happening, in the standard SRM system. How does it behave incase of limit item ?
    Incase it works fine, without any Custom Implementation active in the system, I suspect there is something wrong in your current deactivated BADI Implementation.
    Since i don't have access to your system , Please paste the code here.
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Approval of Shopping cart with limit items

    Hi All,
    We are using n-step item level approval (BADI) for shopping cart approval.
    The approval process is working fine but when i create a shopping cart with limit items, the shopping cart goes withous approval.
    The approval process is also working fine if i am including 1 limit item and one normal item.
    Please let me know why is approval process not working for shopping carts with only limit items.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

    Hello,
    approving a shopping card without any workflow
    is impossible in the Standard SRM case.
    As there is no workflowlog anymore , it was deleted somehow. Please
    ceck if you got processes where the workflow will be archived or deleted
    after a while.
    The question in my point of view is, why was there a workflow
    without any approval steps ?
    As i can see you are using only the workflow ws14500015 which
    is a badi workflow. So the behaviour is controlled from your
    badi,as all approvers come from the BADI.
    If there is a automatic approving then the BADI brings not back
    any approver and the setrelease method of the workflow is triggered
    then immetiately to set the status to "released" = "approved".
    To Do:
    Check your BADI for Shopping Cards like the example one mentioned above.
    Make sure that the workflow logs persist in the system for analysing
    the processes and to get the correct approval preview.
    regards,
    Gaurav

  • BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create PO with limit item (item category = B)

    Hello,
    I want to create a PO with a limit item (category = B). What are the important parameters/tables which have to be filled.
    Currently I'm filling the following:
    POHEADER + POHEADERX
    POITEM + POITEMX
    POSCHEDULE + POSCHEDULEX
    POACCOUNT + POACCOUNTX
    POSRVACCESVALUES
    POLIMITS
    The package number in the item matches with the one which is used in POSRVACCESSVALUES and POLIMITS. When I debugg the function module everything looks fine to me and a PO is also created BUT it does not contain any item with category = B.
    Does anyone of you have an idea what is missing?
    Kind regards,
    Thomas

    hi,
    Please reffer the below link
    Blanket Purchase Order and the Framework Order
    Thanking you

  • Issue with Work Items for a User

    HI All,
    I have an issue with workflow.
    One of my user stopped receiving work items in his inbox. I checked table SWWUSERWI and found 0 entries for the user. So i guess there is no problem with the display setting in SBWP.
    What could be the probable reason and where can i find if those workitems that are generated for him that he has not received.
    Regards,
    Rohit

    There can be many many reasons. You need to understand the workflow and work with an example (an item the user says they should have received). Then try to follow the agent determination logic based on the data contained in that example and verify that everything matches up.

  • SC (SRM) = PO (BE) with limit item (Itm.Cat = B)

    Dear all,
    in SRM I create a SC with two items, the first item is quit normal (material, cost center assignment, etc). The second item is a copy of the first one, unit of measure is LE. Now when this SC is transfered into the BE I want the PO to contain a limit item ( item category = B). The customer is using the classic scenario and upgraded from SRM4.0 to SRM7.0.
    What are the important flags/tables etc. in BADI BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK, method FILL_PO_INTERFACE.
    Currently I'm filling the following parameters:
    PO_SRV_ACCOUNT,
    PO_LIMITS
    zusätzliche Kontierungsinformationen für Serviceposition
          clear ls_po_srv_account.
          ls_po_srv_account-pckg_no    = ls_po_items-pckg_no.
          ls_po_srv_account-percentage = '100'.
          ls_po_srv_account-serial_no  = '01'.
          append ls_po_srv_account to po_srv_account.
    PO Limits
          ls_po_limits-limit     = ls_po_items-net_price.
          ls_po_limits-exp_value = ls_po_items-net_price.
          APPEND ls_po_limits TO po_limits.
    The PO will be created in the backend with the two items, but the item category of them is blank (= normal item).
    Does anyone of you have an idea what is missing?
    Kind regards,
    Thomas

    Hello Laurent,
    I don't know. I think this is something from former times when they had been running on SRM4.0 and they simply took over.
    The UoM is LE and in the BE there should be an appropriate line item in the PO with category B (= Limit).
    How do I define limit items in SRM?
    Kind regards,
    Thomas
    Edited by: Thomas Mueller on Dec 16, 2011 12:36 PM

  • Issue with sent items disappearing from Outlook

    We are having an issue with many of our users who have had their sent items disappear from Outlook. We are running Exchange 2010 SP2 with Rollup 8. All users on Windows 7 appear to be working fine, it is just users on XP that are having the issue. All
    PCs are SP3 with updates applied. The messages were there previously, but the Sent folder shows empty as of Monday. They show correctly in OWA, it is just in Outlook itself that is the problem. If we enable cached mode the items populate, but our standard
    policy is to run online with no local PST. We have tried running Outlook with /clearviews and in Safe Mode, but this does not resolve the issue.

    Hi,
    From your description, all the sent items are correct in OWA. So the Exchange Server is ok.
    About this issue, I recommend you install all the latest Windows updates and check the result.
    Hope it helps.
    If there are any problems, please feel free to let me know.
    Best regards,
    Amy
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Blank Line Item for Rfx Response with Limit Item

    Hi All,
    I have a problem in rfx response for limit item. When creating RFx for limit item, I am using display limit as 'Available to Bid On' and using short text in RFx line item (not using product code). But when bidder creating rfx response, all field in line item is blank (no short text, product category, currency, etc) and bidder need to click on details to see item data. Is this a standard?FYI I'am using SRM 7.0 with extended classic scenario.
    I already try display limit as 'Accept or Reject Possible' but the problem still persists.
    Rgds,
    Aleluya.

    Hello Aleluya,
    As per standard system behaviour you user should be able to see these details in the Item overview screen itself. There is no need to navigate to the details of the same to view them.
    Only to enter price bidder needs to go details of the limit item.
    Have you done any custom changes for the reported scenario here or you are using the standard feature.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • Issue with transfering items from punch out

    Hi All,
    We are using a punch out for ordering shopping carts. It is working fine for all the users but not for one of the user. That user is able to open punch out site in her system and able to select the items in that punch out. But when she clicked on "checkout" button in that site, it is not transferring the items to the shopping cart. Rather it give internet explorer error" Page cannot be displayed". I believe, this is not a punch out or SRM issue. It should be an issue with the user's system settings.
    But I am not sure where to check? Is it something that the cookies need to be enabled in user's system? Could you please help me with your suggestions?
    Thanks,
    SS

    Hi,
    You could perform a HTTP trace (using HTTP watch) and compare the OCI data in POST method for both users (the correct and incorrect ones).
    Perhaps there is some additional/missing information being passed from catalog to SRM.
    Kind regards,
    Ricardo

  • Issue with child items of flex tree using QTP

    Hi,
    We are trying to automate Flex web application using QTP10.
    We are facing below issue with Flex tree when we try to automate a scenario of selecting a child item displayed in flex tree.
    Issue:
    On recording the step of selecting an item from Flex tree using QTP, the script displayed is .Select Index1. But when we replay it back no action is being performed.
    Also on object spy we are able to navigate only till flex tree and we are not able to spy child items of flex tree.On the web page the child items are displayed as radio buttons/checkboxes.
    Please provide a solution for me to this problem.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You could perform a HTTP trace (using HTTP watch) and compare the OCI data in POST method for both users (the correct and incorrect ones).
    Perhaps there is some additional/missing information being passed from catalog to SRM.
    Kind regards,
    Ricardo

  • GoDaddy IMAP issue with "Sent Items"

    There's some long standing issues with GoDaddy IMAP and Apple Mail.  GoDaddy is using Courier-IMAP 3.1.0.5.  The worst of the issues seems to be the fact that if you store your Sent Items on the Server, your log gets spammed with these two message (I'm removed the call stack) over and over and it also seems to degrade performance while Mail tries to traverse the folder hierarchy even though on the surface everything seems to be working.  Mail is spending an inordinate amount of time trying to create this "Sent_Items" mailbox and then failing... over and over...
    Aug 11 09:32:04 seven Mail[9613]: *** Assertion failure in -[IMAPAccount _IMAPMailboxForMailboxUid:name:createIfNeeded:], /SourceCache/Message/Message-1244.3/Accounts.subproj/IMAPAccount.m:1336
              Expected mailboxUid for Sent_Items
    Aug 11 09:32:04 seven Mail[9613]: *** Assertion failure in -[IMAPAccount _IMAPMailboxForMailboxUid:name:createIfNeeded:], /SourceCache/Message/Message-1244.3/Accounts.subproj/IMAPAccount.m:1344
              Didn't create IMAPMailbox for (null)
    Seems to me the reason this is happening has something to do with the fact that the "Sent Items" system folder is internally referenced as "Sent_Items" and they are being treated as synonyms for each other on the IMAP side while Apple Mail is seeing them as 2 different folders and failing when it thinks it needs to create the Sent_Items folder on the server. 
    I'm willing to accept that I could be completely wrong about this, or I could be right, but neither GoDaddy or Apple side seems interested in looking into it and it's very frustrating.  Here's why I think it might have something to do with it:
    [ben@seven][~]$ telnet imap.secureserver.net 143
    Trying 72.167.82.19...
    Connected to imap.where.secureserver.net.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT STARTTLS ID CHILDREN NAMESPACE IDLE] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2004 Double Precision, Inc.  See COPYING for distribution information.
    1 LOGIN [email protected] password
    1 OK LOGIN Ok.
    2 LIST "*" "*"
    * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "INBOX"
    * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Bulk Mail"
    * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Drafts"
    * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Email_Templates"
    * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Send_Later"
    * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Sent Items"
    * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Trash"
    2 OK  Success
    3 STATUS "Sent Items" (UIDVALIDITY)
    * STATUS "Sent_Items" (UIDVALIDITY 1109891090)
    3 OK STATUS completed.
    4 STATUS "Sent_Items" (UIDVALIDITY)
    * STATUS "Sent_Items" (UIDVALIDITY 1109891090)
    4 OK STATUS completed.
    5 LOGOUT
    * BYE IMAP server shutting down
    5 OK LOGOUT completed
    Connection closed by foreign host.
    If you login to the GoDaddy webmail system and bring up the properties of the "Sent Items" folder, it's referenced as "INBOX.Sent_Items" and it's the only folder whose internal name doesn't match the name given in the LIST command.
    I really wish that someone from Apple or someone from GoDaddy would take a look at this seemingly simple thing to fix and just make it work.  It appears to not be an issue for other IMAP clients, or on the iOS devices, though I suppose that my iPhone could be logging all this same stuff internally.
    Hopefully GoDaddyGuy will come to the rescue once again and get this resolved.  If anyone has been able to actually store their Sent Items in the Sent Items system folder and not get this message over and over, let me know.  This has nothing to do with the IDLE command or "Use this mailbox for..." or IMAP prefix (which if you run the NAMESPACE command isn't defined) or any other suggestions that have been given previously. I've already exhausted all the different combinations.
    Sincerely,
    Ben Morin
    CTO
    Sevence, LLC

    Hi,
    I'm marking the reply as answer as there has been no update for a couple of days.
    If you come back to find it doesn't work for you, please reply to us and unmark the answer.
    Thanks,
    Melon Chen
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • Issue with customer download from ECC 5.0 to CRM 5.0

    Dear CRM gurus,
    We are facing very strange problem regarding sales area and sales office in CRM 5.0 test system
    During the download of an ECC 5.0 customer into CRM the BDOC is giving the following error - 'Sales office O 50000617 is not available' and 'Sales office O 50000617 sales group not maintained for sales area O 50000608     10 10'and Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.
    I just select the BDOC and reprocess it immediately. Now the customer is downloaded into CRM and BDOC turns into green. I am also able to see the sales office and sales area in the downloaded CRM BP.
    The sales office 50000617 is very much there in CRM and is properly assigned to sales area 50000608     10 10. That's why, I should be able to reprocess the struct BDOC successfully.
    But for some reason the sales office is not getting determined first time during the download. This issue is driving me crazy. This only happens with the customers with sales office. If there is no sales office in ECC customer (i.e. the field is empty) then there is no issue. This customer will get downloaded without any error.
    Also the downloaded material doesn't have the sales area data. 
    This issue doesn't happen in our development system. The only difference is, sales org structure in development system is manually created and it is downloaded from ECC in test system.
    Can you please advice me on how to solve this issue?. It is a bit urgent.
    All valuable inputs must be rewarded,
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi Gun,
    You are the only one responded to my issue. I have allocated some points.
    Yes. I have checked the assignment in CRM organizational model.
    I did download the org. structure from ECC 5.0
    All objects including sales offices are activated for determination and I have verified with green light
    As per your suggestion if the sales area data is not matched between the two systems, then how come the error will not reappear during the bdoc reprocess?
    What is missing during the first time bdoc process? Looks something is missing for validation module?
    Any inputs?
    Thanks,
    Raj

  • Logon issue with Integrated ESS in ECC 6.0

    Hello,
    We are upgrading to ECC 6.0 from 4.6C. We do not plan to use Portal. PZM3 is not allowed in ECC 6 as 'Screen flow logic' services are not permitted. We had a SSO enabled in the 4.6C system from Win NT using the NT Auth service -- which let users go into ESS services w/o any prompt for login. Currently the ESS services in ECC 6.0 asks for login during first logon after that it doesn't prompt. Can we do the same thing (like that of 4.6C) in the new Integrated ESS(iESS) by using existing tickets issued by Win NT? If not is their any other way SSO can be achieved by not using Portal but by just using iESS? Please advise. Thank you.

    Hi Kshitij,
    SAP note 858138 provides some information about external authentication that is available with SAP Netweaver and points to the related documentation.
    Best regards,
    Klaus

  • Password inconsistancy issue with RFC users in ECC 6.0 System after upgrade

    Hi,
    We have upgraded the system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, but facing the password inconsistancy problem for RFC users. We have set the parameters like "login/min_password_lng" as "8" and "login/password_downwards_compatibility" as "3" & RFC user Type is "system". Could you please suggest how to resolve the password inconsistancy issue.

    Hi Chandan,
    you need to run the txn. SECSTORE and there it will shows you all the RFCs that have inconsistent passwords. Please maintain the correct passwords there.
    In case the existing passwords are no longer acceptable due to new security policies as per the new SAP version, you will have to change the password from SU01.
    Regards,
    Shitij

Maybe you are looking for