Issue with PO IDOC Change

Hi,
When I change purchasing organzation and purchasing group of a PO, the IDOC is not generated and the error message in process log says that "No IDoc items belonging to purchasing document found". Is there any way to generate an IDOC when we change these details also?
I have configured the message type ORDCHG for changes in PO. Please help me in generating the IDOC for changes to purchasing organization, purchasing group and other header details of PO.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Phani Kumar. S

Hi,
Whenver you change the fields(EKGRP/EKORG) are there any entrires in the table BDCP?
And also didi you make configuration for the above fields using BD52.
Regards,
Ashok

Similar Messages

Issue with ORERS05 IDOC sending immediately after Purchase Order creation.

Hello,
When output mode of an outbound partner profile was setup as Transfer
immediately then when ever EDI output is generated in Purchase Order then
system creates IDOC and sends immediately out of system. But middle
ware has received only control record and whole data records were missing in IDOC file received by middle ware and we were receiving status 29 back from middle ware.
Right now we changed outbound partner profile, output mode was set to
Collect IDOC's and we are running RSNAST00 program in background to send those IDOC's but we
were looking into go for first option to send idoc out of system as soon EDI output is generated in Purchase Order.
Is there any way of fixing this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Prasad

Yes, I'm facing with PO IDOC only and as I said it is not issue with middle ware as they were receiving only IDOC control record.
If I resend same idoc by setting status back to 30 they were able to receive whole IDOC and more over if we set partner profile to Collect IDOC and schedule back ground job every 5mins then middleware was bale to get whole idoc.
Looks like it is SAP issue as this the message I got from SAP.
The problem only exists if the messages are supposed to be output by
means of transmission time-spot
4, that is 'immediately' (during the saving of the application).
With the output of the change message, the change documents are read for the purchasing document (all as of the last successful transmission).
With the transmission time-spot 4, it can occur that the change
documents do not physically exist on the database yet. No change message can be generated in this case and the system generates message ME140 or ME760 in the message log.

Issues with Purchase order change documents

Hi Gurus,
I have some peculiar issues with Purchase order. The PO line item has deletion indicator set but I can't find who set the deletion indicator. The PO change documents doesn't show anything related to deletion indicator.
Please help to fix the Issue.
Regards,
Senthil

Hi
Check it in Tcode SE16
Table Name CDHDR and CDPOS
Regards,
Raman

Having issues with trying to change style in Robo11

Having an issue with Robo11 allowing me to change a style in a topic (document imported from Word) that already exist in the style css. Robo allows me to scroll down, but immediately jumps back to the top. This has only occured on 4-5 projects out of over 50 projects. Have tried more than one way to change style, but continues to jump to top of style type list.

Can you try the styles and formatting pod instead? (View > Pods > Styles and Formatting) Can you assign the style through that?

Issue with xfa.event.change in XFA 3.3

HI all
I've found an issue with the way that XFA 3.3 processes the script below on a change event when a user paste's more than 1 character to a textfield.
var sChange = xfa.event.change;
if((sChange.length>1)){
    app.alert("Bad User\nCopy and paste has been disabled for this field");
    //discard the change
    xfa.event.change = "";
in XFA 3.0 the alert is sent and change is removed, in XFA 3.3 the alert is sent but the change persists.
Any Ideas?

Hi Mark,
Unfortunately thats not possible as I'm using Flash Fields with data being passed between the PDF and the Flex app which only works in XFA3.3, let me know when its fixed.
Kind Regards
Kevin Mortimer
Solutions Archtect
Avoka

Issue with DEBMAS IDoc,not all fields are reflected in the IDoc Seg E1KNB1M

For IDoc type DEBMAS, there is a segment E1KNB1M. This segment is relate to the customer correspondence details (XD02 -> company code data -> Correspondence).
For any change to the customer master a DEBMAS IDoc is triggered which has data in segments including the E1KNB1M.
In my case for few customers, the not all fields in the segment E1KNB1M contain data. Few fields contain data but the rest are filled with u2018\u2019. This is happening only in the production system, for the same customer in the quality system the data is there as required.
I checked in debugging, and found that the data is correctly passed to the segment in program SAPLVV01 Include LVV01F01. And the segment contains data till the IDoc is triggered. I.e. the fields are not getting cleared at any point.
Can anyone suggest what is happening and how to fix this? Please note that the issue is only in the production system and not in the quality system ( for the same customer).

BTT... Need some help on the above

Issue with PO IDOC

Hi,
IDOCs for creation and change of PO is done successfully. But when I try to delete a particular line item in the PO (ME22N), the IDOC is not generated and when I try to issue the output manually, an error message No Items Found is displayed.
Please let me know how to do testing for deletion of IDOC and also let me know whether generation of an IDOC is possible when there is deletion in the PO or not?
Helpful answers will be rewarded.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Phani Kumar. S

Hi
have u configured the msg type ORDCHG in the outbound parameter of the Partner profile with the correspoding message control parameters?
If so try to trigger the idoc manually form PO transaction.
Cheers,
Hakim
Mark all useful answers

HR - Daily Snapshot Issues with Future Dated Changes

The w_employee_daily_snp_f_1 table has timing issues. The effective end date on all per_all_assignments_f, per_all_people_f, etc always shows the time at midnight. For example: 08/14/2009 12:00:00 AM. When this person has a new assignment, for one day only, the extract does not pick up this person. See example below:
Employee 123 has a supervisor change and the new supervisor is effective on 6/15/2009
Emp Eff Start Date Eff End Date Supervisor
123 01/01/2009 12:00:00 AM 06/14/2009 12:00:00 AM 888
123 06/15/2009 12:00:00 AM 12/31/4712 12:00:00 AM 555
When the ETL runs on the night of 6/14/09 at 7:35:42 PM, this record does not get picked up because according to the apps.per_all_assignments_f table on the day of 6/14/09 this person does not have an active assignment. There is one day when the person (according to the system) does not have a supervisor. The next night, on 6/15/09 10:34:18 PM the record reappears and does so every night until the assignment record is again end dated. This only occurs for future dated HR changes.
This is a big problem because if the future dated change is for a supervisor, not only does the supervisor not appear in the daily snapshot, but either does any of his/her subordinates. Has anyone else run into this problem? How did you solve it? Did you customize all the HR mappings?

Have posted an updated version of the MST to my webspace here:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/minkus/shockwave/shockwave115606mst2.zip
This new version fixes the following issues (changes to this version in bold):
MsiInstaller repair & errors on first run as non-admin (removes 'AppData' directory entries)
DCOM errors once Shockwave is installed (adds double quotes to the beginnning of LocalServer32 value)
Incorrect TypeLib paths in the registry (fixed to use built-in [SystemFolder] property)
Default CLSID description value missing (set to 'Shockwave ActiveX Control', as per the executable installer)
Incorrect Shockwave 10 paths in the registry (fixed to use built-in [SystemFolder] property)
Misspelt 'OptionalComponets' registry key (renamed to 'OptionalComponents')
Missing .dcr, .dir, .dxr Content Type registry values (included in the executable installer)
Fixed incorrect AppID registry key (set to use installer's [VERSION] variable)
Removed 'Launch SWDNLD.exe' shortcut created in Programs subfolder (people don't want this - see here)
I have tested this on my network and it all seems to work fine. Unfortunately my original plan to use the executable installer didn't work out as it does not include the Shockwave 10 compatibility components described here and here, so it looks like I'll have to keep this MST file up to date with the latest versions until Adobe fix the problems themselves...
If you want to see the changes that I have made, load up Adobe's 11.5.6.606 MSI file in Orca, then use Transform / Apply Transform to apply the MST, and look for the entries in green.
Please post any feedback to this thread, and I will try to respond if I can help!
Chris Hill

Performance issue with custom IDOC download into SAP MII

Hi,
We have a custom IDOC which has ten fields. We take the data from these ten fields and insert into database. The issue is
we have some where around 4500 idocs flowing into SAP MII and then from SAP MII to sql database. The time taken for these idocs is around 30 mins.
Is there a way where we can improve the performance in terms of time taken?
Additional information is
MaxReaderThreadCount has been set to 5 in Configuration Management -> Infrastructure -> Application Resources
sample idoc structure
<IDOCNAME>
<FIELD1>val1</FIELD1>
<FIELD10>val2</FIELD10>
</IDOCNAME>
Please let us know if more information is needed.
Regards,
Manish Jain

Hi Manish,
My thinking about the queuing is that for each transaction, you are calling your database and passing in the IDoc content. Depending upon your system, database, transactions, etc., you may be having to establish a connection between MII and the database each time you process an IDoc. Each "handshake" takes a finite amount of time. So queuing up the IDocs, establishing a single DB connection and processing large numbers of IDocs in a batch might reduce your processing time substantially. Something worth investigating.
I don't think that adding additional IDoc Listeners for different IDoc types will work if the source ECC system is the same for each type. It will simply use the first one it finds and process all the types there.
Additional threads may improve performance and is certainly a low risk, easily implemented test. Just do it in small increments as you can add too many threads (check with the NW administrator) and lock up your NW system.
And you may want to check with your DBA to see if there are limits on the connections which MII can establish for uploading the IDoc content (or for that matter, any other improvements to be made on the DB side).
Regards,
Mike
Edited by: Michael Appleby on Feb 10, 2012 2:37 PM

Table - Issue with Logging Data Changes

Hi Experts,
My client's requirement is to log data changes happened in a table which is critical. I've selected 'Log data changes' check box in technical settings of the table. Now, I'm able to see log for all the changes i did after that. But, I'm facing following issues. Kindly help me in fixing the same.
1. The table is having two fields with same data element. In the change log SCU3, under the field name, field label mentioned in the data element is getting displayed. As, the data element is same for two fields, its difficult to find out which particular field is changed. Is there any way to display table field name instead of field label from data element?
2. Sometime, even there is change in the data record, I'm able to see a log record in the change log with caption 'Data record unchanged'. What might be the problem and how to resolve?
Thanks in Advance,
Siva Sankar.

Hi Moha Nan,
You just use ABAP to change the table P? In this way I think it is not change to X table.
You can upload master data to add navigation,it is a good way to bulid the SID of P table and X
table .
Hope it is help to you!

Configuration issue with ISMBP_CREATE IDOC

Hi Experts,
Currently my client is creating Business Partners through BP transaction.
The issue now we have is that create and changes made using a BAPI for creation BAPIBUSISM007_CREATEFROMDATA and change BAPIBUSISM007_CHANGE.
For both bapis i have find message type and basic types.
BP creation: Message type ISMBP_CREATE and basic type ISMBP_CREATE01
BP change :Message type ISMBP_CHANGE adn basic type ISMBP_CHANGE01
Now i am using existed partner profiles, partner profile LS -> added message type and basic types in outbound parameters.
Then i have added this BAPI IDOC details in distribution model Add BAPI using the old distribution model.
Now i am creating BP using Bapi in my system business partners are creating but IDOCs are not triggering.
Please help me.
Thanks,
Anji

Hi,
I got solution my self.
By doing below steps we can get it work.
Business Partner IDOCs will be generate in the both create and change time, for this we have to call BAPIBSUISM007_SAVEPROXIES. The input of this function module is business partner only.

PO Form Issue with Header Level Changes

Issue:
It has been observed that whenever changes are done in PO Header (e.g. Header Text), system prints Billing Address and Communications Details as blank. If the changes are made to Line Item level along with header then system prints the Billing address and Communication Details correctly.
Analyse:
we are using the SELECT statement below to fetch the field for
Billing Address and Communications Details.
SELECT SINGLE
mandt z_plant z_company_code z_toll_free_no z_local_no z_fax_no
z_email z_name1 z_name2 z_street z_house_no z_district z_post_code
z_city z_country z_vat_no z_loc_term_cond z_langu
FROM zptp_poformdata
INTO w_poformdata
WHERE z_plant = ls_ekpo-werks
AND z_company_code = ls_ekpo-bukrs .
And when we only change the header level data no value is passing for comany code and plant . as a result Select statement gets failed and we are getting blank window.
NOTE: we are getting blank box only when we fire a print or fax.The preview is coming fine.

by asking so many questions in a single post,you are violating the rule of engagement given below
Only One Question Per Posting
For each question that you have, make a separate posting. Don't ask multiple questions in one posting, this is confusing for people and might not get answered, since the subject line does not reflect all your problems. If a new and unrelated question comes up during a thread, start a new thread.

Issue with LSMW IDOC method

Hello there,
I am facing an issue while creating a LSMW using IDOC method. I am creating it for PROFIT CENTER upload. My file is having the data as, there can be multiple company codes for one profit center, so my file will have more than one record for single profit center. I have to create only one IDOC per profit center, so I have to create multiple segments in that IDOC for different company codes.
I am not sure how to create multiple segments using LSMW. It will be very helpful, if anyone can tell me how to do it.
Thanks,
Ganesh Khumse

Hello Ganesh,
I assume that you are using the IDoc Type PRCMAS02 for the creation of Profit Centers along with Company Code assignment.
In order to be able to extend the Profit Center for Multiple Company Codes, please segregate the source structures into Profit center general data and company code data...along with respective source fields.
In the structure relations, assign the Profit Center General data to the Idoc segments E1KEPCM & E1KEPCT. Then assign the Company Code data to the segment E1KEPCB.
The input file layout expected will be something similar to the below layout...
PCHEAD1
- CCODE1
- CCODE2
PCHEAD2
- CCODE1
- CCODE2
Hope this info resolves your problem.
Pls reward if this answers your query.
With Regards
Vijay Gajavalli

Issues with Reprocess Idoc

Hi all,
The developement for BOM interface is done.
it is working fine.But my client extented requirement like this
after processing IDOC , if there is any status 51 idocs available.
he will do reprocess from BD87. that time some part of code in FM needs to be triggered.
I am not able make Difference b/w first IDOC number and Reprocess IDoc number.
means for keeping conditon , i need one unique differenet between new IDOC and Reprocess IDOC.
Is there any point to know that properties.
thanks in Advance,
regards,
JBR

Hi,
Reprocessing a idoc would not create a new IDoc, only the status of the IDoc would be changed if the error with which it was already occuring has been modified.
Thanks
Krithika

Issues with Master Data Change Run after upgrade 7.3.1

We have upgraded to 7.3.1 on both our BW and ECC clients. When we first run out change run in BW it chose to drop and rebuild aggregates
on changes that usually don't cause a drop and rebuild. They usually do a delta.
Has anyone had this issue once upgraded?
We looked at our performance setting in SPRO for aggregates and the settings have not changed.

I loaded data for 0Material, 4 fields are not getting populated....when I checked in R/3 base table and RSA3, I am able to see data for those 4 fields. But in PSA and 0MATERIAL I am not seeing data for those fields.
THose 4 fields are Z fields mapped to Standard fields in MARA table.
As you say you can see the values of these fields in RSA3, We can rule out that the fields arent hidden. Check the mapping on the BI side, do you have all the Zinfoobjects added to the Omaterial and the corresponding mapping of source fields to target fields.
0CUSTOMER_ATTR has some data...I added new field in datasource as well as in BW also. After creating transformation I executed the DTP, it is throwing same error in every data package
"Record filtered in advance as error records with the same key exist".
Load till PSA is Init with data transfer and DTP is delta.
there are some duplicate records in the master data values that are coming in. You can manually change them in PSA and load. And if you are sure the duplicated records can be dropped, you can tick the HANDLE DUPLICATE RECORDS in DTP - update tab

Issue with PO IDOC Change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for