Issue with Query OLAP time very high

Hello Guyz
I ran my query in RSRT, and noticed tht the QOLAPTIME was almost 432 seconds (the query had crossed the 65556 records limit by then). The DBTIME was 70 secs.
1. Are the above times in seconds?
2. What are the performance techs I can implement, to improve the OLAP time? Since I think aggregates, indexing and partitioning only improve the DB time?
3. I already have cache active on this query.
Any suggestions?
Please don't post the same question across the different forums
Edited by: Moderator on Jul 8, 2009 11:46 AM

Hello,
One more thing, do any of the standard tech. of Indexing, Partitioning, Aggregate creation help in decreasing the OLAP time?
These tech will be helpful for DB time but no use for OLAP time. And RKF didn't cost extra OLAP time but CKF and CELL calculation do.
In your post you said there are more than 65535 rows. That's the main cause of high OLAP time according to my experience. Why users want so many rows? It's almost impossible to read. You can imaging how long it would take to transfer so many data from bw server to user (result in high OLAP time).
Please reduce the lines by filter or something else. If you can't reduce the line number, I don't think the OLAP time would be low.
Regards,
Frank

Similar Messages

I just restored my 13" MBP i5 at the apple store to the newest version of Lion after issues with a previous Time Machine backup from Snow Leopard- this time I created a new account and just ported files and folders, and now MS Office doesn't work. Help?

I just restored my 13" MBP i5 at the apple store to the newest version of Lion after issues with a previous Time Machine backup from Snow Leopard- this time I created a new account and just ported files and folders, and now MS Office doesn't work.
^^ that's the main problem. Here's the full history.
I bought a new 13" i5 MBP, early 2011 edition. I had an old white Macbook 2.14 ghz core2duo on Snow Leopard. I attempted to port over my time machine backup, but encountered problems in that my User was inaccessible from the new computer after the import finished, and I had to go in and change the root password, etc, and for some reason or another, I couldn't install any programs at all from that administrator's account. By "couldn't" I mean I could install them, but upon installation they would never boot. So, I took it to the apple store and did a clean install from the most up to date Lion OSX. Then, I created a brand new admin account, instead of trying to import the old one, and things seemed great. Then, I just imported my old files from the TM backup, but not any system settings, permissions, or user data. Just my Docs, pics, vids, apps, and itunes stuff.
Here's where things get weird again. I imported this stuff under the name "old", but all of these folders have a red negative sign on them, marking them as restricted. So, from my main admin account, I cannot even peruse these folders. Since I didn't import user data, I can't sign in to the "old" account to change permissions. I already tried to change the permissions from system preferences, but that didn't change anything. And now, for whatever reason, of all the apps that were imported then, MS Office is the only set of apps that does not work. When I click on it, it just says there was a problem and asks if I'd like to send a report to apple. I tried reinstalling it to no avail. I'm an English student, so i really need access to Word. Can anyone help? The Apple store is a major detour for me and would like to fix this issue myself.

Most likely you have Office 2004 which are PPC-only applications and will not work in Lion. Upgrade to Office 2011. Other alternatives are:
Apple's iWork suite (Pages, Numbers, and Keynote.)
Open Office (Office 2007-like suite compatible with OS X.)
NeoOffice (similar to Open Office.)
LibreOffice (a new direction for the Open Office suite.)

Issue with site load time when exported as HTML. Addressed?

Has the issue with website load time been addressed?
I believe the site attempts to load the entire image content at the initial visit - meaning any galleries with numerous pictures are all included when first getting to the site. This is causing a HUGE increase in load time. I was told when I last brought it up that it was an apparent issue that needed to be addressed.
Any type of resolution coming?
Site for reference: www.dkrecollection.com

Major updates of Muse are targeted to release roughly every quarter. The 1.0 release was in mid-May. The 2.0 release was in mid-August. A fundamental change to image loading would only appear as part of a major update due to the engineering and testing efforts required.
As provided in your previous thread http://forums.adobe.com/message/4659347#4659347 the only workaround until then is to reduce the number of images in the slideshow.

Load+gen time very high

Hi all
i m using SAP 4.7 on Oracle 9.2
Server- IBM P series Processor 375Mhzx 2 RAM - 3 GB
I hav problem that in ST03n i have Load +Gen time very high (upto 500)
is it some H/w problem or some tuning prob.
Thanks in Advance

SGEN will recompile ABAP loads that you want.
your system look old, so, this can take anything from 1 hour to 8 hours.
so, do this when user load is minimal.
I usually choose all options and do a complete generation. this takes a lot of space in your DB, but system will be faster even if you use rarely used transactions.

Issues with Query Caching in MII

Hi All,
I am facing a strange problem with Query caching in MII query. Have created one xacute query and set cache duration 30 sec. The associated BLS with the query retrieves data from SAP system. In the web page this value is populated by executing an iCommand. Followings are the steps I followed -
Query executed for first time, it retrives data from SAP correctly. Lets say value is val1
At 10th sec Value in SAP changed to val2 from val1.
Query excuted at 15th sec, it gives value as val1. Which is expected as it gives from cache.
Query is executed 1t 35th sec, it gives value as val2 retriving from SAP system. Which is correct.
Query executed at 40th sec, it gives value as val1 from cache. Which is not expected.
I have tried with java cache clear in browser and JCo cache of the server.
Same problem I have seen for tag query also..
MII Version - 12.0.6 Build(12)
Any thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Soumen

Soumen Mondal,
If you are facing this problem from the same client PC and in the same session, it's very strange.. but if there are two sessions running on the same PC this kind of issue may come..
Something about caching:
To decide whether to cache a query or not, consider the number of times you intend to run the query in a minute. For data changing in seconds, and queried in minutes, I would recommend not to cache query at all.
I may give a typical example for query caching in a query on material master cached for 24 hours, where we know that after creating material master, we are not creating a PO on the same day.
BR,
SB

Performance issue with query when generated from an ODS

I am generating a query from an ODS. The run time is very high. How do I improve the performance of the query ?

Hi Baruah,
Steps:
1. Build the Secondary Index.
2. divide the data in to 2 ODS where Historical and Present data ODS's and then build a Multiprovider and build the query on multiprovider.
3. Build the Indexing on the Table level (ODS table level).
We cannot make much faster performance for the ODS's that too with huge data...
The above are very few of them...
Hope you understood ..
Regards,
Ravi Kanth

Issue with PTO (Paid Time Off) quota generation

Hi All,
We have an issue with quota generation of PTO for our employees.
The issue goes like this:
We have a Paid time off for employees 5weeks( 200 hrs) for employees who have worked less than 5 years.
we have paid time off for employees 6 weeks ( 240 hrs) for employees who have worked more than 5 years.
we have the following logic that has to go in this config:
-- Our fiscal year starts on Feb 1st and ends on Jan end or Feb starts which has a full week of working days. ( ex: if 01/31/2012 falls on a Thursday the following Monday which has full 5 day working week would be the end of the fiscal year).
-- Depending on the working hours of the employees and the date of joining for the first year ( for new hires)0041 info type the eligibility gets varied and reduced. Ex( employees who joins on start of fiscal year and works 40hrs per week schedules is eligible for 200hrs of PTO. Employees who join in the month of august and works for 35 hrs per week ( i.e mid of fiscal year) would get 91 hrs of PTO.
I need to put this in the system. I am thinking this could be done with out tweaking PCR.I need help in configuring this in Absence quotas as to what are the things i need change in system config and how do i do it. Please help with some screen shots if possible. I really need this to get it done ASAP. Looking forward for help.
Thanks,
Chowdary.

We use TM00 schema. Can i call TS15 and TS 12 rules into TM00 acheieve my issue of quota entilements?
Iam doing this because my businees needs to see if an employee chages his work schedule from 40 to 30 or 20 etc.. the PTO has to vary accordingly.
As the minimum eligibility is to work for 20 hrs to avail the PTO days. If at any point the employee drops it under 20 he will not be eligible till he work any this >= 20hrs per month so the evaluation has to check periodically to update the quota availability.... I need help plz suggest ...

Performance issues with query input variable selection in ODS

Hi everyone
We've upgraded from BW 3.0B to NW04s BI using SP12.
There is a problem encountered with input variable selection. This happens regardless of using BEx (new or old 3.x) or using RSRT. When using the F4 search help (or "Select from list" in BEx context) to list possible values, this takes forever for large ODS (containing millions of records).
Using ST01 and SM50 to trace the code in the same query, we see a difference here:
<u>NW04s BI SQL command</u>
SELECT
"P0000"."COMP_CODE" AS "0000000032" ,"T0000"."TXTMD" AS "0000000032_TXTMD"
FROM
( "/BI0/PCOMP_CODE" "P0000" ) LEFT OUTER JOIN "/BI0/TCOMP_CODE" "T0000" ON "P0000"."COMP_CODE" = "T0000
"."COMP_CODE"
WHERE
"P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "P0000"."COMP_CODE" IN ( SELECT "O"."COMP_CODE" AS "KEY" FROM
"/BI0/APY_PP_C100" "O" )
ORDER BY
"P0000"."COMP_CODE" ASC#
<u>BW 3.0B SQL command:</u>
SELECT ROWNUM < 500 ....
In 3.0B, rownum is limited to 500 and this results in a speedy, though limited query. In the new NW04s BI, this renders the selection screen unusable as ABAP dumps for timing out will occur first due to the large data volume searched using sequential read.
It will not be feasible to create indexes for every single query selection parameter (issues with oerformance when loading, space required etc.). Is there a reason why SAP seems have fallen back on a less effective code for this?
I have tried to change the number of selected rows to <500 in BEx settings but one must reach a responsive screen in order to get to that setting and it is not always possible or saved for the next run.
Anyone with similar experience or can provide help on this?

here is a reason why the F4 help on ODS was faster in BW 3.x.
In BW 3.x the ODS did not support the read mode "Only values in
InfoProvider". So If I compare the different SQL statements I propose
to change the F4 mode in the InfoProvider specific properties to
"About master data". This is the fastest F4 mode.
As an alternative you can define indexes on your ODS to speed up F4.
So would need a non-unique index on InfoObject 0COMP_CODE in your ODS
Check below for insights
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=6224682&messageID=2841493
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

Issue with Building OLAP Cubes in Project Server 2010

Hi
There is some issue with while building OLAP cubes.
I have created OLAP cube then successfully cube has builded. When i add resource level custom field which has lookup tables values in ASSIGNMENT CUBE then getting cube failure meesage.
I deleted and recreated custom field and lookup table but no luck
Below error message from manage queue jobs
General
CBS message processor failed:
CBSOlapProcessingFailure (17004) - Failed to process the Analysis Services database <DB NAME> on the 10.3.66.12 server. Error: OLE DB error: OLE DB or ODBC error:
Warning: Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation.; 01003. Errors in the OLAP storage engine: An error occurred while processing
the 'Assignment Timephased' partition of the 'Assignment Timephased' measure group for the 'Assignment Timephased' cube from the <DB NAME> database.
Internal error: The operation terminated unsuccessfully. Server: Details: id='17004' name='CBSOlapProcessingFailure' uid='f2dea43a-eeea-4704-9996-dc0e074cf5c8'
QueueMessageBody='Setting UID=afb5c521-2669-4242-b9f4-116f892e70f5
ASServerName=10.3.66.12 ASDBName=<DB NAME> ASExtraNetAddress= RangeChoice=0 PastNum=1 PastUnit=0 NextNum=1 NextUnit=0 FromDate=02/27/2015 02:10:15
ToDate=02/27/2015 02:10:15 HighPriority=True' Error='Failed to process the Analysis Services <DB NAME> on the 10.3.66.12 server. Error:
OLE DB error: OLE DB or ODBC error: Warning: Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation.; 01003. Errors in the OLAP storage engine: An error
occurred while processing the 'Assignment Timephased' partition of the 'Assignment Timephased' measure group for the 'Assignment Timephased' cube from the
<DB NAME> database. Internal
Queue:
GeneralQueueJobFailed (26000) - CBSRequest.CBSQueueMessage. Details: id='26000' name='GeneralQueueJobFailed' uid='b7162f77-9fb5-49d2-8ff5-8dd63cc1d1d3'
JobUID='76837d02-d0c6-4bf8-9628-8cec4d3addd8' ComputerName='WebServer2010' GroupType='CBSRequest' MessageType='CBSQueueMessage' MessageId='2' Stage=''.
Help me to resolve the issue
Regards
Santosh

Is the SQL Server and Analysis Server are running on different servers and not on default ports?
If yes, then check if the same alias’s name added in Project Server is added on the Analysis Server.
Cheers! Happy troubleshooting !!! Dinesh S. Rai - MSFT Enterprise Project Management Please click Mark As Answer; if a post solves your problem or Vote As Helpful if a post has been useful to you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

Issue with Query on a virtual infoprovider

Hello,
I am getting the following error message while executing a query on a virtual infoprovider. We have recently gone through upgrade from BI 3.5 to BI 7.0 EHP1 (SP5) and from SEM BCS 4.0 to BCS 6.0.
EVersion not specified or not unique                                                             UCR0                006
EError reading the data of InfoProvider ZBCS_CV11                                    DBMAN             305ZBCS_CV11
EError while reading data; navigation is possible                                          BRAIN               289
I>> Row: 11 Inc: RAISE_READ_ERROR Prog: CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE   RS_EXCEPTION        301CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE
this query has been running fine before the upgrade. In the selection screen there are two fields - version1 and version2, if I am specifying same value in both the fields then the query runs fine and if I am providing different values then the above stated error message appears.
I have tried different settings with properties - Read mode: H,A,X and also different combination from the properties of the virtual infoprovider - with and w/o hierarchies; with and w/o navigation attributes but it did not workout.
the only thing which has changed on this virtual provider is that I had enabled delta caching as this was supposed to be used in a multiprovider.
Has anyone experienced similar issue or have an idea as to what is going wrong here. Please advice.
Regards,
Manish

Hi Manish,
I have exactly the same issue with a query on a virtual infoprovider after upgrading from BI 3.5 to BI 7.0 EHP1 (SP5) and from SEM BCS 4.0 to BCS 6.0.
Would you be so kind to tell me how you fixed this. (other queries seem to be working)
Kind regards,
Jamie Flaxman

Issue with Date and Time Picker on Windows 8.1 and Office 2013

We are having a issue with the Developer tool in Excel called the Date and Time Picker which puts a calendar field into the spreadsheet where you can select a date from the calendar popup
If we change this date field and then save and close and reopen it reverts back to the previous date before the change was made
If we do the same process on a Windows 7 machine with Office 2013 it saves the changes we made to the Date and Time picker field

Hi jdono2,
I'm using Windows 8 and Office 2013,and I can't reproduce this issue.
Please make sure you have already upgraded to the latest version of excel, try to reregister the MSCOMCT2.OCX.
Also you can try to use another date picker add-in to test this issue.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/36f83f24-cd76-4f8e-aa7b-5f166666e7d3/excel-2013-popup-calendar?forum=exceldev
Wind Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Issues with restoring a Time Machine backup onto new Macbook Pro Retina

I recently got a new Macbook Pro Retina and I've been trying to restore a Time Machine backup made today from my old Macbook Pro laptop. I didn't restore from the first start up (foolishly, seemingly) simply because of the trivial reason of wanting to see the system all clean and new.
I've tried the Migration Assistant but it gets stuck on "looking for source..", despite having the ex.HD plugged in and double checking the existance of the backup itself on the ex.HD.
I've also tried booting the laptop up in the 'restore' mode (cmd R) and restoring from there but it sends me in a constant loop of 'this backup was from a previous model of laptop' or something to that affect. It also doesn't display the recent backups at all, only displaying those from the beginning of this year for some reason. All backups are in the same place on the ex.HD so its not an issue with locating the backups.
Really stuck on this one! Would really appreciate some help!
Thanks a lot, and merry Christmas

Yes, you can restore to another machine if needs be.

Issue with query output

hi there,
I have an issue with the display of hours 00:00:00 in the query output in BW.
The system assumes it as 0 or blank and therefore display it under unassigned hour.
I am using the reference of 0TIME for this hourly display.
When I checked the 0TIME i could not find the corresponding SID value for 00:00:00 hours.
Can anybody please advise what needs to be done?
Thanks in advance,
Kind regard,
Kate

Hi Kate,
I am experiencing the same problem as you: an InfoObject, created referencing 0TIME, represented in the BEX Query as "#" when the Value is "00:00:00".
How did you work it out?
The Formula Variable strategy is not applicable in this case because 0TIME is not a key figure !
Bye
Aldo

TenFourFox issues with computer date/time

I had an interesting problem tonight which I fixed and can replicate whenever I feel like. On my old Powermac I run TenFourFox which is what I assume most are doing.
The battery in my Powermac needs to be replaced, but I almost never unplug the computer so I'm never worried about the computers time, as it is always right.
Tonight I had to unplug it and when I started it up I got the "wrong time" notice but I mostly ignorred it. Everything worked well and then I tried using TenFourFox...it was an utter disaster.
It was slow, unreponsive and overall unuseable to say the least. After a lot of thinking I set the time right and it worked again, as it had before.
So after this I set the time wrong again and sure enough, TenFourFox before unuseable.
Does anyone know if there are any known issues with TenFourFoxx in the department? Could someone else try this? (Just set your clock back a few days and try to open TenFourFox)
I'm curious if I've found an issue with the app because I know for a fact ti's not hardware issues.

Running v 5.0 here, no problem in TFF changing the Time backwards, but Safari wouldn't work here until I cleared the Caches.
Some Servers are Date/Time critical & consider anything trying to connect reporting the Time off by more than a minute will refuse connections.

Performance issue with Query

11g
Hi there experts,
I have an issue with performance with a simple SQL which I thought cannot be tuned but just wanted to check with the experts here. We are running a query to get a persons ID based on his logged in email address from a Parties table which is huge (Millions of records). The query takes about 30 seconds to return a value. Was wondering is there a way to optimize this
The query is
{code}
select par.party_id
from parties party, users users
where
lower(party.email_address) = lower(:USER_EMAIL)
and party.system_reference = to_char(users.person_id)
and users.active_flag ='Yes';
{code}
The emails are stored in upper and lower, hence the lower functions
IS creating a function based index the only way?
Thanks,
Ryan

Hi Everyone.
Thanks and apologies, first post on tuning as such. Here is the explain plan generated through SQL DEVELOPER. IT showed the output in XML
By the way, looks like the {code} tag does not work?
{code}
SELECT STATEMENT
84903
     HASH JOIN
84903
     Access Predicates
     PARTY.ORIG_SYSTEM_REFERENCE=TO_CHAR(PERSON_ID)
     TABLE ACCESS
     PER_USERS
STORAGE FULL
1059
     Access Predicates
     AND
     ACTIVE_FLAG='Y'
     OR
     OR
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=0
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=1
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=DECODE(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID'),NULL,BUSINESS_GROUP_ID,TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID')))
     Filter Predicates
     AND
     ACTIVE_FLAG='Y'
     OR
     OR
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=0
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=1
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=DECODE(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID'),NULL,BUSINESS_GROUP_ID,TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID')))
     TABLE ACCESS
     HZ_PARTIES
STORAGE FULL
83843
     Access Predicates
     LOWER(PARTY.EMAIL_ADDRESS)='[email protected]'
     Filter Predicates
     LOWER(PARTY.EMAIL_ADDRESS)='[email protected]'
{code}
Purvesh, around 50% are 'Yes'
Thanks!

Issue with Query OLAP time very high

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for