Issue with retriggering Release Strategy

Hi all,
We have a one off situation here. We had already 10 release staragies in our system. We added 2 more release strategies with a new characteristic. We updated the characteristic value only for the new 2 release strategues and did not update the rest 10. Although now we had updated the characteristic value for remaiining strategies, the purchase documents created in the mean tme is not subjected to release strategy. To ensure business control we need to retrigger back the release strategy for almost 1000's of documents.
As any change to purcahsing document will retrigger it when done manually, but given the number of documents and as per Note 493900 we cannot trigger it by any backgoriund job to modify as below:
16. Question :
Why is there no release strategy determination when a program changes in
background a purchasing document which corresponds to the classification of
a release strategy ?
Answer :
This is the system design that a release strategy determination can only be
triggered through a user action and not by changes made in background
process.
If you create a document (e.g. PO, Contract, etc), the determination of the
release strategy takes place only in case of a user event like checking or
saving the document.
Kindly suggest any best practise to retrigger release strategy  for the missing documents to ensure business control. Any easy and time savig measure to get it resolved will be appreciated.
Regards,
Anand Sampath

Hi Arnand,
After investigation by searching customer messages database ,I found              
other customer has  similar problem as the release strategy has changed           
after creation of the SES please review the  explanation from developer           
:(whose release code is 03 )                                                                               
When you try to revoke the acceptance of the service entry sheets                 
in ML81N or ML81, the 'Enter release code' pop  up window appears, but            
entering the code that is determined via the menu path Goto -> Entry              
Sheet -> Release Strategy (which is the 03), the SES remains the same.            
Nothing changes. The status does not vary and no error or warning                 
message is issued.                                                                               
Checking the customizing for the release strategy, the release code               
03 should have never been assigned to the SES 800024272 as the values             
for the relevant characteristics were not included under that code.               
I do not know how it was managed to accept the SES.                                                                               
Now, when you try to revoke it, it seems that no release                          
strategy can be determined, not even including the values RCARESANO               
and 012 between the valid values for the characteristics of the release           
code 03 (RCARESANO as valid value for SUPERVISOR_SERVICIOS                        
(CESSR-ERNAM)and 012 as valid value for GRUPO_COMPRAS (CESSR-EKGRP)).                                                                               
The only Possibility is to change now the SES so that the release                 
strategy can be re-determined by the system.This is the Only possible             
way that the system can  redetermine the Release Strategy , but it will           
not be possible to do so as the SES is already accepted with the Old              
strategy and it does not admit any further changes.                               
To be able to change it you would need to revoke the SES first,                   
but this Will also not be possible as the Release Strategy was changed            
and the system still applies the old rules for determining the Release.           
Solution to our Problem                                                                               
The Only way to revoke the SES is to Restore back the Old Strategy that           
was prior to 03 in the customizing.So now what will happen is that by             
applying the Old Rules the System will be able to revoke the SES that#s           
using the Old one. Once the necessary SES are revoked then go back to             
customizing and apply the new strategy as it was did now, and                     
Change the SES and save , the new value of the Release Strategy will get          
updated in the table ESSR and the field frgsx will now have 03.                                                                               
Problems associated if the Release strategy is changed                                                                               
Actually the release strategy is not supposed to be changed when there     
are some documents in the System that uses it and even if you change the   
Strategy the Old records will not get AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED by the        
system.The Release Strategy routine has to run again to update the         
values. This is Possible by changing the document SES ,                    
This change will happen only if the SES is not accepted and if its         
accepted then you need to revoke and to revoke you need to restore the     
old strategy , revoke and then change the SES , and have to go back to     
customizing and Start using the New strategy from now on by doing so the   
Routine will update the old record with the new strategy.                 
b) You may want to use CEKKO-BADAT(Requisition Date) or any other
structure in CEBAN or CEKKO and create a new release strategy    
to differentiate the old release strategy.
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Similar Messages

  • Issue with PO Release strategy

    Hi experts,
    I have problem with Po release strategy in 5 to 10 purchase orders, i have created few purchase orders(2000 Po's) with same document type and company code ..etc and saved, then release strategy has been triggered.
    For few purhcase orders release strategy has not been triggered.
    If i take 1 po from that few purchase orders(Release strategy has not triggered) as reference and again if i create PO,new purchase order have getting created with release strategy.
    Can some body tel how this ican be possible, hope this might be standard syatem behaviour.
    Hope i should delete thos e purchase orders and i should create new PO's instead of of old PO's (Without release strategy).
    Some experts can share their experiance in this regard.
    And how i should proceed further with this issue.??
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You issue in your system has 2000Nou2019s purchase orders  with release strategy has been triggered but 5 to 10 purchase orders do have release strategy.
    & when you are creating a new PO with reference to old purchase orders (which release strategy has not triggered) and on saving NEW PO created with triggering release strategy.
    Cause for above:
    PO which release strategy does not trigger because the purchase orders are created before setting release strategy for PO. Those PO triggered release strategy and all are created after setting release strategy for PO.
    Action:
    Its completely business call for business users to go for options:
    Option-- >1# You can use same old PO which release strategy does not triggered, do GR and all other process
    Option-- >2# You can create new PO with reference old PO which release strategy does not triggered and upon saving you will have new PO number with release strategy triggered, then release PO & do GR and other related process.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Retriggering Release strategy for PR with Document Type, Company Code and Price Range as Characaterstics

    Hi Friends,
    I have a issue to fix. The issue is releated to PR.
    There are some PR's in the system which has wrong release strategy picked up or wrong approvers picked up due to some congif change. now that the config changes are rectified correctly, we need to find a solution to correct the PR's which got affected due this.
    I have to retrigger the release strategy for all the affected PR's.
    The characterstics which we have consider for release strategy is Document Type, Company Code and Price Range.
    Can anyone suggest how can we retrigger the PR in bulk or individual to all the affected PR's, so that it picks up correct release strategy as per new config changes.
    Regards,
    Manjunath K

    Hi,
    Refer the discussion to triggers release again on release code addition/change in release strategy.
    release code is changed on PR release strategy - old PR can´t be approved
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Issue: Purchase order release strategy with storage loaction.

    Hi Friends,
    I have created release strategy for purchase order considering following characteristics.
    1. Plant
    2. Purchase organization
    3. Purchase group
    4. Document type
    Hence the release strategy is working fine.
    Now the requirement is changed, PO approves should be picked depending on the storage location wise. So i tried to create characteristic for storage location with table name CEKKO and with field LGORT. However system not allowing to create, telling that field LGORT not found in table CEKKO.
    Can any one tell me how to maintain this LGORT filed in structure CEKKO.
    Thanks in advance
    Shashidhar

    HI Shashi ,
      Thanks for your quick response,
    I have Appended a structure to Standard Structure CEKKO with Field LGOBE.
    Also we written the code :move:  i_cekko = e_cekko, in user User-Exit M06E0004 function exit
    FUNCTION EXIT_SAPLEBND_002.
    However, the release strategy is not triggering when PO is saved,
    also the user-exit is not getting triggered , even though i have included the statement ' Break-Point'
    in it.
    Kindly reply.
    Thanks  ,
    Shashidhar

  • Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

    Hi,
    Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level  approval process.
    Information:
    it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
    Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
    Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesn’t disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
    In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
    WORKFLOW STARTED-->
    1st WF appears in WF log.
    Level 1 releases WI ->
    2nd workflow appears in WF log +
    1st workflow with (in process status)
    Level 2 releases WI ->
    3rd WF appears +
    2nd workflow with (in process status) +
    1st workflow with (in process status)
    Level 3 releases WI ->
    3rd WF appears +
    2nd workflow with (in process status) +
    1st workflow with (in process status)
    ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
    Level 4 releases WI ->
    4th WF appears +
    3rd WF appears (in process status) +
    2nd workflow with (in process status) +
    1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
    ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
    Result:
    PO gets released.
    In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.

    Hi Kjetil,
    Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
    RGroup Rcode   Workflow     Agent
    Z6          R1         1                Blank
    Z6          R1             1                Blank
    Z6          R1             1                Blank
    Z6          R1             1                Blank
    Release is sequential.
    For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
    Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields  Agent/ UserID , level, department.
    Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ): 
      When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
      For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2,  L3).
      For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
      Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF  container.
      In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and  the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
    Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
    Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
    Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM

  • ECC6.0 upgrade issue with IDoc release

    Hi experts,
    we are in the process of upgrading our ECC environment from 5.0 to 6.0. We have quite a few interfaces which use ORDERS/Invoice Idocs in customised form. In ECC5.0 environment, we had developed a Z segment in the ORDERS Idoc and the segment release was set as 640. Everything worked fine in ECC5.0.
    In upgraded environment, SAP has released new version of some segments. one of those is E1EDP01. This segment has 2 new versions in ECC6.0 environment - 007 and 008. This change in the version changes the data in the IDoc and hence interface goes in error at the EDI provider.
    We have tried to use 640 as the IDoc segment release in the partner profile of the IDocs. This still gives us an issue because the 007 version of the segment E1EDP01 has release 620 and hence the Idoc picks up 007 version instead of 006 version as desired. When we change the partner profile with Segment release in the IDoc type as 46C, it gives us an issue in the Z segment saying that the IDoc segment is not released in 46C and the Idoc goes in error.
    has any one faces such situation in the past? if yes, please throw some light.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    Iam new to SAP. Thar’s why i can’t understand well to do upgrade,
    Then i found out some notes from internet about Upgrade : ‘‘ SAP Note Number 857904  (upgrade from Release 6.’ To 7.0)’’.
    In that notes,
    Actually i would like to know about some key words (for example : ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER…. )  which how to work in the Release 7.0
    Always i have some objets in 4.6C. 
    Ex 01: ’’READ DATASET p_dataset INTO wa_record’’
    Ex 02 :  ’’ TRANSFER i_crhu TO p_crhd ’’
    LOOP AT i_crhd.
    *disable controls in crhd
        PERFORM f_disable_crhd.
        TRANSFER i_crhd TO p_crhd.
        IF sy-subrc NE 0.
          MESSAGE a045.        "Error when transfering data to error file
        ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
      CLEAR i_crhd.
      CLOSE DATASET p_crhd.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        MESSAGE a039.                      "Error at close dataset
      ENDIF.
      OPEN DATASET v_crhd FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE.
    And then i have some FM (ex : WS_UPLOAD , WS_DOWNLOAD)
    So I have changed the code for WS_UPLOAD by GUI_UPLOAD
                                  and WS_DOWNLOAD by GUI_DOWNLOAD
    now my problem is to know about some key word which how to work in ECC6 (for example ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER…. )
    thanks in advance
    Rathy

  • Problem with my release strategy (PR), Please help

    Folks,
    I have designed a release strategy with three characteristics:
    This is what I entered in characteristic
    1.PRQuantity with table name MEREQ3211GRID and  Field :MENGE
    2.PRmaterial # with table name RMMG1 and  Field :MATNR
    3.PRPlant with table name RMMG1 and  Field :werks
    the value for PRQuantity is >= 10000,000.
    Also, I have set the indicator for (allow interval) in characteristics
    Classes, procedure with classification, Release startegies are all proper.
    I am getting the Release startegy tab in PR, but the problem is when I adopt a PR to create a PO with PO quantity >=10000, the release starategy gets picked up, which is perfect but it is also getting picked up with PO Quantity <=10000.
    I dont understand why is it getting picked up for <=10000..Please suggest!!
    Thanks in advance!!
    Megha

    Megha,
    In your original post you said,
    "1.PRQuantity with table name MEREQ3211GRID and Field :MENGE
    2.PRmaterial # with table name RMMG1 and Field :MATNR
    3.PRPlant with table name RMMG1 and Field :werks"
    Per documentation I have seen, the table you should use for your characteristics for PRs should be CEBAN and CEKKO for POs.  Here are some links to SAP notes you may find useful.
    [365604 - Release strategies in purchasing|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=365604]
    [493900 - Release Strategy|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=493900]
    [672719 - Release strategies in the service|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=672719]
    Note 365604 may be by far the most descriptive of how to set up the entire process.  Hope this helps if you are still having problems.
    Regards,
    Paul

  • Verison Management with PO release strategy - CEKKO-REVNO

    Hello,
    I'm a bit stuck... I'm trying to do a PO release strategy using version management, were the PO goes through a release strategy if the PO gets changed (not the intial PO creation).. So once the field RENVO is greater then 0, it should go through R.S.
    I've read to create a characterstic CEKKO-REVNO and then assign it as a valuet <0...  I  intital;y created it with a NUM Data type, but the ABAP dictonary overides it with a CHAR instead... So I read to mark the value as a default value (<0)
    However, after I add it to my class, I go to the define release strategy - classifcation section (to add the value <0)  I'm getting  a value inconsistency check.
    How do i setup this characterstic so I can use it in release strategy?

    Based on adding 00000000 the release strategy will work when its version 0 (intial). However, I'm trying to have it so it goes through a release strategy when the version is 1 or greater...
    It seems like I cant get the strategy to work for more then one version... I can get it to work for version 0 but no others, or version 1 and no others etc...
    I need to have it some it works for anything greater then zero, in which i tried <0000000  and even >000000
    I also tried adding 000001, 000002, 0000003, 0000004 etc..  An although the release strategy tab is still applying, it will NOT result to a blocked status...
    I cant get this to work... How should the characterstic value look to get this requirement?
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Feb 20, 2012 3:16 PM
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Feb 20, 2012 3:43 PM

  • Migration form W/O Classification to With Classification Release Strategy

    Hi MM Experts,
    Our client is currently having purchasing requisition release strategy based on without classification. There are almost hunderds of release codes for multiple sites.
    Now he wishes to migrate to release strategy with classification. So, Can anyone guide me on what all the cut-over tasks that has to be considered before going live ???
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Devendra Gaware

    hi,
    first for doing  the settings
    follow this link
    http://www.sap123.com/showthread.php?t=59
    all these settings should be done in development server and test it
    if it working good
    migrate the data to production server
    if useful Reward me
    Thanks & Regards
    Swathi

  • HR organisation Structuer Link with PR release Strategy

    Dear Gurus,
    As per our organisation, once the PR is created, it has go to  the Cost Center Owner and it has to follow the HR organization structure. we have 200 Cost centers in different departments.
    Please help me how to configure this with HR organization structure
    Your help is most appreciated and Full point will be rewarded.
    Thanks
    RS

    Neetu,
    Hi Neetu,
    My Release strategy working fine and nothing wrong with it. My question is, why only NB type is falling for Rel Strategy. I think I found answer from Rosa's Answer. If you check overall release at Document Type, then that document type falls for Release Strategy.
    Thanks all. I am closing this with Answered and points goes to Rosa...

  • How to block PR creation with no release strategy

    Hi,
    We have this PR release strategy implemented. Currrently, user are able to create the PR even there's no release strategy determined. Thus, PO can be created as the processing state is "02 Active". 
    Would like to block user from creating the PR if there's no release strategy determined. How should we do in order to achieve this?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Sue

    Hi Sue
    Assuming that you are using release with classification.
    Create a new characteristic for PR document type (CT04)
    Attach this characteristic to your Class (CL02)
    Create new release strategy and in Characteristic data you will have to assign all your PR document type. This will ensure that all the PRs need to be released.
    Regards
    Rajesh
    -Do reward if this is useful.

  • Multiple release of Service Entry sheet in ML85 with a release Strategy

    Hello Techies,
    We have requirement where in we need to each release service entry sheet created in each month.
    We have created a release strategy and now using ML85 for releasing SES instead of ML81N.
    Is there any process so that all the SES are released at once(Mass release) .
    Thanks
    Jayashree

    Hi Dear,
    you select the SES as per your Release code and Code Grp, henceofrth the no of service entry sheets will be  display you can choose the multiple Entry sheets and select the green flag w/o coming to the same T-Code again and again.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • Issue with New Release Deploying Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010

    Previously I created a deployment project with Visual Studio 2010 using the Beta 2 release of the distributable. This worked fine and installed on a 32-bit XP machine.
    I've since updated the project to use the new Release version of the distributable CRRuntime_32bit_13_0.msi. Now when I run the installed program it gives me the following message -
    "An error has occurred while attempting to load the Crystal Reports runtime. Either the Crystal Reports registry key permissions are insufficient, or the Crystal Reports runtime is not installed correctly. Please install the appropriate Crystal Reports redistributable (CRRedist*.msi) containing the correct version of the Crystal Reports runtime (x86, x64, or Itanium) required. Please go to http://www.businessobjects.com/support for more information."
    I've had a look at verious posts and added code to the app.config file so it looks like -
    <startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
    <supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.0"/>
    </startup>
    and also tried targetting various .NET frameworks, but without success.
      Am I missing something?

    Hello,
    More info, are you installing on the same PC as the Beta was installed on or a clean PC?
    Your app must be set to the full framework, not the client version.
    Are you installing by right clicking on your setup.exe and selecting run as administrator?
    Setting that option in the app.config is only required if you are using that driver you found the info on.
    Run ProcessMonitor and set it to filter your installer and see what it reports.
    Thank you
    Don

  • Issue with ME28 - Release Purchase Order

    Dear All,
    One of our user is unable to release a purchase order through Transaction code ME28.
    The role is assigned only with the Transaction Code ME28 with the correct Release code and Group.
    We have tested from our end and see that the Auth Objects M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are missing based on SU53. When we have added back it worked.
    When i check in Su24 the Auth Obj M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
    I dont understand how this Transaction is working, when the behaviour of the Transaction ME28 is to release the purchase order why is the system asking for additional Auth Objects.
    please advice.
    Regards

    Hi
    M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
    If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ?  Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
    I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28.  SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
    In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

  • Configuration tool issue with new release

            With this new release - September 2013 - We have found that when doing find products (as opposed to enter sku) the option to add seems to work -  it gives a message that its added. But when returning to config the SKU has not been added.  Its a bit anyoying as you then have to re-enter the SKU to add the product. - Several staff have observed this at our site..   Others ?

    Hello Hsummons,
    Thank you for brining this to our attention and we sincerely apologize for inconvenince this might cause.
    Please be informed that in order for us to process your request with the steps to take on this concern. We are requesting that you may open a case with us or you may us at CCW Support 1-800-553-6387 options 2 and 3 or you may email us at [email protected] or [email protected]
    With this, we may be able to assist you with the CCW Tool. Again, we aplogize for the inconevenience.
    Thanks,
    Jen
    CCW Support Team

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error while validating application in version 11.1.2.2

    Hi guys, This is the first time I work with EPMA, and I find it really challenging! 1) While trying to deploy the application after updating the Shared Library (all dimensions in the application are shared), I got the following error: "Error: The 'Vi

  • DVD will play on iMac, not on DVD player

    I'm burning dual layer DVDs from iDVD. The DVDs won't play on my DVD player, but will play fine using the DVD player on the iMac. Anyone have any idea why?

  • Money owed to me from BT

    Right this is a long story really, i had a mix up with my account at the end of last year, i had to have a new account opened. I received a bill for my previous account which had an error so i called BT and they arranged to get this looked at. A few

  • Family Album Not There After Turning on Family Share

    I have turned on Family Share with my Husband.  We are now sharing Calendar, Reminders, Books, App but not Photos.  A Family Photo album was not automatically created like it was suppose to.  Can anyone help with this?

  • Best way to view PDF page(s) with in a custom program

    What is the best approach for viewing PDF page(s) in a custom program?  I know you can hook in Adobe PDF Viewer, but I need access to mouse clicks and location on the page.  As well, I need to control the scale and zooming of the PDF page(s). I'm not