Issue with settlement of prod. order (KO88)

Hi Friends,
We are facing a issue while settlement of prod order using with tcode KO88.
In production Order, the distribution rule is created for account assignment category MAT (material) with settlement type PER (periodic settlement). We have added category CTR (cost center) with type PER to distribute percentages as 50% & 50%.
When we check the distribution rules in Production order system says its OK with-out error but when same is settled with KO88 system shows an error "Settlement type PER: Total percentage in distribution rules <> 100%".
Please help.
Regards,
Rohit

Hi Siva,
I looked into this OSS note and seems to be relevant for this error.
Thanks for the reply and i am closing this thread.
Regards,
Rohit

Similar Messages

Goods Issue with reference to Purchase Order

Hi MM Gurus,
Is there any settings to do Goods Issue with reference to Purchase order?
I want to capture the material price in purchase order during goods issue instead of standard price or moving average price.
Thanks in advance
Dinesh

Hello Dinesh,
Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
Please check in sandbox environment before using.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Issue with exported playlist song order

I exported a playlist (with the playlist sorted on the manually arranged order, far left column) as a .xml file using iTunes 7.0.2. When a friend imports this playlist into his iTunes (7.0.1) the song order is incorrect (again with sorting done on the far left column). When I look at the exported XML file with a text editor the order of the song entries is also wrong in the XML file. Has anyone elsed noticed this problem?

Actually, I looked more closely in the text editor and the playlist order looks correct so there appears to be an issue with 7.0.1 (I guess).

Automatic Settlement for Prod.orders & Product Cost Collectors.

Dear all,
Please help me how to carryout the Automatic settlement of Production orders &
Product Cost collectors on every month last working day mid night.
Please tell me how to schedule this as an automatic scheduled job.
This program is not been allowed to schedule as a job.
Waiting for your inputs.
Please help me.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Hi
Create a Variant with the order types need to be setteled at the period and schedule the same in background processing.
Regards
Venkat

Issue with part delivery of orders containing payment card lines

We have a problem with part deliveries of orders containing payment card authorizations.
Our customers can buy items in our webshop paying with credit cards. The webshop is connected to our payment service provider who authorizes the complete amount of each order. The order data including authorization data is transferred from the webshop to our SAP ERP (ECC 5.0), where order documents are created, delivered and billed.
For example, an order was created with 3 items:
A for 5 u20AC
B for 10 u20AC
C for 20 u20AC
For now, we create 3 payment card authorization lines according to those items.
Line 1 5 u20AC
Line 2 10 u20AC
Line 3 20 u20AC
Item C is temporarily not available, item A and B can be delivered and billed. The system now takes authorization line 3 (as 5 u20AC + 10 u20AC = 15 u20AC < 20 u20AC) for the first billing. The authorized amount of this line is completely consumed.
When item C becomes available and is delivered and billed, the creation of the FI-document fails because there isn't enough authorization amount left.
The creation of 3 payment card authorization lines is not mandatory for our business, creating one line for the complete amount would be as fine. But how can we avoid the complete comsumption of the authorization line then? Or do you have any other suggestions / best practices how to deal with part deliveries of orders containing payment card authorizations?
Regards.
Hilka Kaminski-Nieswandt
Sabrina Förster

Hello fridaynights,
It would be worrisome to receive an email notification that we were unable to authorize your payment method, especially if the payment method appears to be fine on your end.
Generally speaking, when items ship separately from one order, we will authorize the full amount of the order when the order is placed. Authorizations may expire after a few business days, but as items ship individually, your card would be authorized and charged for the individual shipments.
Using the email address you registered with the forum, I was able to locate your order with the canceled amiibos. It would appear that we were unsuccessful in authorizing funds on the card on multiple occasions, and so the remaining amiibos were canceled. I apologize for any trouble or displeasure that this cancelation may cause you. I would encourage you to keep an eye on these amiibos on BestBuy.com for changes in their availability.
As it seems there was an issue with your My Best Buy MasterCard, I would encourage you to contact Citibank, the issuer of your My Best Buy MasterCard account, at 1-888-574-1301 for further inquiries into this authorization issue.
If you should need further assistance, please let me know.
Regards,
Tasha|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Issue in settlement of sub orders to WBS Element

Hi Team,
Request your help in getting the below issue resolved:
Our client would like to have the sub order cost details to be settled to the superior order settlement reciever (In our case it is WBS). So we have changed the configuration in the Distribution rule in SPRO to "DIstribution Rule from Main Order". With this change the WBS Settlement receiver is getting populated automatically during release of the sub order. But when we are trying to do the settlement in KO88 we get a message that "Either the order is settled or there is nothing to settle". Please let us know incase of any setting being missed out.
Thanks for your help in advance
Regards.
Priya

by moving thread to forum http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/project-systems or http://scn.sap.com/community/eam may generate favourable replies.
Thanks
Ritesh

BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but it returns the message 'Goods Movement not possible with mvmt type 601'.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Hi John,
My data are as follows:
GOODSMVT HEADER:
PSTNG_DATE: 30.09.2004
DOC_DATE: 30.09.2004
REF_DOC_NO: had tried 1014000359 or empty
GOODSMVT_CODE: 03
GOODSMVT_ITEM:
MATERIAL: HP0121002
PLAN: 1010
STGE: 10FG
BATCH: BATCH1
MOV: 601
CUSTOMER: 180017
ENTRY_QNT: 1
ENT_UOM: PC
ENT_UOM_ISO: PC
DELIV_NUMB: 1014000359
DELIV_ITEM: 000001
From your feedback, it is possible to use the BAPI to create a goods issue for movement type 601?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Issue with Monitoring of Subscription Orders

Dear Experts ,
Recently we are facing an issue in the monitoring of subscription orders.
We have scheduled the Monitoring ( Tcode : JKRM) in the background during the night time. Since last few days, our basis guy is complaining about creation of too many archive logs due to this. I am not sure whats to be done for this. Hence seeking your help in this. Please suggest what needs to be done for this so as to avoid creation of un necessary archive logs.
Regards,
Chintu

Hi Chintu ,
SAP has a standard functionality of creating the archive log in the system whenever any transaction is processed (Table Name : BALDAT).
In your case , there can be 2 reasons for creation of unnecessary archive logs :
1. There are lot of subscription orders which are in Error ( Check the monitoring log )
2. You are running transaction JKRM with Record Success Messages in Application Log check box On. If this check box is on at the time of monitoring , system will try to record each and every activity done for the individual subscription order ( Either Suspension , termination, closure or offer creation) though it is not in error.
Hence I will suggest you to check which of the above 2 reasons causing you trouble.
Please check the same and Get back to me.
Regards,
Nikhil

Issue with the Framework Purchase Order

Background: Using the Framework Purchase Order in the Plant Maintenance module for external operations:
When The Framework Purchase Order is used for external services procurement with service specifications, Purchase Requisitions are created based on the quantity of services requested against the Maintenance Order. Since I am using the service specifications, limits are not used in the Framework Order.
Problem:
The system does not do any check on the quantity that is requested for a service against that in the Framework Order. Hence the PRs get created linked to the Framework Order for whatever quantity requested in the Maintenance Order. Now the vendor submits the Service Entry sheets against those PRs released with respect to the Framework Order. That time the system does not allow the SES to be posted, because it exceeded the service quantity in the Framework order service specifications. In otherwords, there is no check against the framework order service quantity, when requisitions are released against the Framework order in the Maintenance Order. The check at the the time of SES is too late causing problems for mass creation of service entry sheets and also if external data entry is done for the SES by the vendor.
Is there any setting or configuration in SAP that helps to circumvent this issue? Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Nebu.

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Issue with creation of sales order in CRM system

Hi Experts,
Here are the details of the process we followed
1.     We found a Function Module u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D which is used to create a sales order in CRM.
2.     We have set a Break point in the FM u201CCRM_ORDER_MAINTAINu201D and tried to create a sales order using the transaction u201CCRMD_ORDERu201D. For this the parameters we have given are
a.     sold-to-party
b.     ship-to-party
c.     quantity
d.     product
And after this we have saved the order and the order is saved and in the debug mode we have the parameters in u201CCRM_ORDER_MAINTAINu201D and we found all these     parameters in the FM.
3.     After this we have given all the parameters mentioned above in the FM u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D and still the order is not created, gave an error message saying that CRM_ORDER: Incorrect values in the interface object.
4.     We checked the CRM_ORDER badiu2019s interface and it is having only header guid to be given. We gave this header guid also in the FM u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D and then it gave a different error saying that : Document cannot be saved.
5.     Finally we are not able to know the parameters to be passed to the FM to create an order.
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Lakshman.

Hi Easwar,
Now i am able to create a sales order by passing the parameters to "BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI" and the parameters i am passing are Process_type in the ORDERADM_H, parner_fct (partner function), partner_no , Quantity and prod_ordered (product name) but after creation of sales order using my report program and if i see the sales order uisng transaction crmd_order (using transaction ID) or crmd_orderadm_h(using headerguid) or crm_order_index, only the PROCESS_TYPE is updated but the remaining parameters which i passed like QUANTITY,PRODUCT NAME,PARTNER NUMBER are not present in the sales order. I am providing the code which i have written for creation of the sales order. Can you please look into it and tell me where i might have went wrong??
*& Report ZCREATEORDER_TEST
REPORT ZCREATEORDER_TEST.
DATA : LV_HEADER_GUID TYPE GUID_32,
WA_HEADER            TYPE         BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_HEADER          TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_GUID_DIS,
ITAB_PARTNER        TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_PARTNER_INS,
lt_product_i TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_ITEM,
wa_product_i type BAPIBUS20001_ITEM,
lt_schedlin_i type standard table of BAPIBUS20001_SCHEDLIN,
wa_schedlin_i type BAPIBUS20001_SCHEDLIN,
ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS TYPE TABLE OF bapibus20001_input_fields,
ls_inputfields TYPE bapibus20001_input_fields,
WA_PARTNER          TYPE BAPIBUS20001_PARTNER_INS,
ITAB_RETURN          TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIRET2,
WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE LIKE LINE OF ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE,
           "To store the Objects to be saved.
WA_CREATED_PROCESS LIKE LINE OF ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS,
ITAB_SAVED_OBJECTS   TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_OBJECT_ID,
WA_SAVED_OBJECTS    LIKE LINE OF ITAB_SAVED_OBJECTS,
GC_X type c.
gc_x = 'x'.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUID_CREATE'
IMPORTING
    ev_guid_32 = lv_header_guid.
CLEAR : WA_HEADER.
Passing the respective values from the Header table to internal table.
WA_HEADER-GUID          = LV_HEADER_GUID.
WA_HEADER-PROCESS_TYPE = 'ZTA'.
APPEND WA_HEADER TO ITAB_HEADER.
*Appending the values to the ITAB_HEADER.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PROCESS_TYPE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
*ls_inputfields-ref_handle = '0000000000'.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CHANGES MADE
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'LOGICAL_KEY'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
   ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'QUANTITY'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
   ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CHANGES MADE
WA_PARTNER-REF_GUID = LV_HEADER_GUID.
WA_PARTNER-REF_KIND = 'A'.
giving the partner function and partner no 000000038 for slod to party
WA_PARTNER-PARTNER_FCT = '00000038'.
WA_PARTNER-PARTNER_NO = '10017'.
APPEND WA_PARTNER TO ITAB_PARTNER.
*"ADDING VALUES for the product
wa_product_i-header        = lv_header_guid.
wa_product_i-handle        = '0000000001'.
wa_product_i-ordered_prod = '12000014'.
wa_product_i-mode          = 'A'.
APPEND wa_product_i TO lt_product_i.
*"ADDING VALUES for quantity
wa_schedlin_i-quantity   = 30.
wa_schedlin_i-handle = 1.
APPEND wa_schedlin_i TO lt_schedlin_i.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
*ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'REF_GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PARTNER_FCT'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PARTNER_NO'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'
TABLES
    HEADER          = ITAB_HEADER
    ITEM            = lt_product_i
    RETURN          = ITAB_RETURN
    PARTNER         = ITAB_PARTNER
    INPUT_FIELDS    = ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS
    CREATED_PROCESS = itab_created_process
    SCHEDULELINE    = lt_schedlin_i.
READ TABLE ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS INTO WA_CREATED_PROCESS WITH KEY GUID = LV_HEADER_GUID BINARY SEARCH.
WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE-GUID = WA_CREATED_PROCESS-GUID.
Appending the Guid of the contract to be saved to the internal table
APPEND WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE TO ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    update_task_local = space
    save_frame_log    = GC_X
TABLES
    objects_to_save   = itab_objects_to_save
    saved_objects     = itab_saved_objects
    return            = itab_return.
Calling the Standard BAPI to Commit the transcation.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
I have debugged the above code, all the values are passing are passing to the FM "'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'" and these passed to the CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN and then to CRM_ORDER_READ which are called inside the "'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'". Finally the sales order is created but not able to see all the values that i am passing except PROCESS_TYPE.
Thanks a lot in Advance,
Lakshman.

Issue in closure of prod order

hi friends,
even after production order is fully delivered, when i try to close the orders i am getting an error as no hr update. this error is applicabe only when the orders are confirmed based on personnel numbers in co11n.
i ticked no hr update in confirmation parameters and closure is happenning. but for those orders which were already executed before i ticked in conf. pmts. are not able to close.
pls guide me if u have come across this and have a solution.
regards
madan

Hi
try with setting the status technically completed though tcode COHV for mass processing
and then check
i think it will get closed

Issue with service line purchase orders.

Hi Experts,
    We have recently upgraded to following pack levels -
System                                 Pack level
ECC 6.0          17, EHP4 Stack 7
SRM 5.0          17
There is an issue around purchase order change. If an existing PO is edited and a new line is added to the PO it appears fine in SRM system. But on replicating to backend, we see that the newly added line has been duplicated i.e. appears twice thereby reflecting incorrect value.
This is happening for Service line items. Has anyone had similar issue at their end ? I tried to search SAP Notes but found nothing relevant to our issue.
Any pointers / suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks
RB

Hi
Before going to SAP, Check the data being passed to ECC from SRM. Activate the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for creating data in test directory instead of posting the documnet. then check the data in BAPI Segments, if the data is proper there then there is some problem in ECC 6 ehp 4 which need to be highlighted to SAP, otherwise its a problem in sending the data from SRM to ECC.
OSS Note for creating test data is - Note 539978 - Automatic generation of BAPI test data directory
Regards
Virender Singh

Issue with ME28 - Release Purchase Order

Dear All,
One of our user is unable to release a purchase order through Transaction code ME28.
The role is assigned only with the Transaction Code ME28 with the correct Release code and Group.
We have tested from our end and see that the Auth Objects M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are missing based on SU53. When we have added back it worked.
When i check in Su24 the Auth Obj M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
I dont understand how this Transaction is working, when the behaviour of the Transaction ME28 is to release the purchase order why is the system asking for additional Auth Objects.
please advice.
Regards

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Having Issues With IPhone 4 Pre Order at Apple & AT&T

Hi all
I to tried to order this morning and am stuck in the loop at the Apple site. I then went to the AT&T site (Premier and regular) and those give you the link to pre-order then only show you the 3GS. Even the AT&T rep could only bring them up.
I do have a question for all. When I placed my business number in (have business and personal) to the Apple site it told me to go to AT&T. My question is if I am finally able to order a phone under my personal line can I use this with my business line (transfer the phone to that line) ? I am eligible for upgrades on both lines.
Reason I ask is that I will be buying one phone per account but as the white is not available was thinking I would order the black first on my personal line and pair it with my business number. I know you could do this by calling AT&T and switching over your SIM card in the past but with the new micro sims is that possible ?
Thanks all, hopefully we will all be able to pre order successfully soon

I had the same problems with the Apple site. The AT&T site began offering the iPhone 4 pre-order around 4 AM CDT and I was able to pre-order through them on the first try, after several failures on the Apple site. The only downside is that you have to have it shipped, so you can't pick it up at a store as you can with the Apple site.

Issue with Dying Light pre order points.

I pre ordered Dying Light for the PS4 and my account shows that I have gotten the 500 points for the $10 credit, but it shows that the total of the order was $0 and that I recieved no points for the actual purchase.I used my store card to pay for the order

Hello BBCJustin,
I've heard good things about Dying Light. What do you think so far?
I'll be happy to review your points with you for the purchase. Please watch for a private message from me shortly.
Thanks for being a My Best Buy member,
Mike|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Issue with settlement of prod. order (KO88)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for