Issue with Stock

Hi
Sometimes I am facing this issue. In MMBE and LX03 bin against particular material, stock will be there and in the table if u check stock will be there. When I do stock transfer from bin to bin it is showing no stock.
Material is not deleted.
Thanks....
Raja

Hi,
Check the stock status for that material in both MMBE & LS26.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.

Similar Messages

  • Issue with stock qty of component in Structured Articles in SAP BI

    Dear Experts,
    We are extracting stock in BI through SAP standard data source. We have used 2lis_03_bx and 2lis_03_bf data sources. We are facing issue with stock data validation due to structure articles (pre-pack) available in SAP source system.
    We have stock of structure articles available at DC in source system.  When we extract this information in BI, this article gets split into its components automatically. Due to which stock of components articles gets increased with huge amounts.
    To analysis it in further detail, we have created below scenario:
    Article Document Number:  4900000827
    Article Number (Pre-pack):  300000082901
    Article Number (Component): 300000082002
    Stock of pre- pack article at this article document number: 174 pc
    Stock of component article at this article document number: 348 pc (due to splitting of pre-pack article) + 151 (its own stock movement). Total stock for this article is 499. But actually total stock for this article should be 151 only.
    As per our Business requirement, pre-pack article should not be split into its components. And stock in BI should be totally in sync with SAP stock.
    I kindly request you to suggest the solution to rectify the same.
    Thanks in advance.
    --Vikas

    Hi Vikas,
    Check the OSS note L 1320386 - Frequently asked questions regarding BW Trade Foundation too.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

  • Facing Issue with Stock Ageing report

    In Blocked Stock Ageing report Output, I am facing following issues
    1. Stock is correct but once we include the "Reason For Movement" then the aging is getting wrong  and in some cases value is coming Negative.
    2. In some cases "Reason For Movement" is coming in ‘#’, but this is a mandatory field. Hence cannot be blank.
    Note:
    1. Overall stock is coming correct.
    2. Reason Movement chat. is in free char
    3. Report is based 0IC_C03.

    Hi Nadeem,
    Reason for Movement is loading from  what attribute?  check in RSRV for that attribute.
    RSRV-->All Elementary Tests ->Master Data ->Compare Size of P-, Q- with X- and Y- Tables respectively .
    If it has any error then  correct that error in RSRV. It  will solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

  • Issue with stocks on packagin unit?

    Hi Experts,
    User called in to report that he needs 2 stocks to be checked on Packaging Unit.User wants to check if they  are available. User gave the stock # number also. Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.
    Regards,
    Sauryasen

    Hi Kiran,
    Thank you for your reply. As mentioned earlier the user has given the stock number only which is parsed with the catalog number. However no plant information has been provided though the used wants 2 stocks to be added on the packaging unit and wants to check if they are available. Please provide a solution if the query is clear.
    Regards,
    Edited by: SAURYASEN on Jun 9, 2010 12:04 PM

  • Issue with stocks on packaging unit?

    Hi Experts,
    The issue is that the User called in to report that he needs 2 stocks to be checked on Packaging Unit.User wants to check if they are available. User gave the stock # number also. I want to understand what is the T-CODE is required for this stock updation or is there any other way to check the packaging units for stocks. Kindly help me to solve this issue.
    Any help is highly appreciated.
    Regards,

    Just run MMBE for the material (or MD04).
    Regards,
    Nick

  • Issue with Mvt type 311

    Hi friends,
    I have a issue with stock transfer from one storage location to another with transaction MB1B using movement type 311.
    When ever we transfer stock for a material, it transfers from unrestricted to quality restricted stock. eg. if a trasfer from 0001 sloc to 0002 sloc, then it will transfer 0001 unrestricted to 0002 quality inspection.
    Can plese some one tell me where these settings are maintained?
    Thanks,
    Rohit

    Hello,
    This is not the SAP Standard Practice,
    While transfer of material from one storage location another stoarge location thorugh 311 movement type, the stock type should be same in both the storage locations.
    you can directly transfer from Unrestricted  0001 storage location to 0002 Storage location (quality inspection), before that you should match both stock type , through respective movement type 321 or 322.
    then you can transfer one storage location to another (stock type should be same)
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik.

  • Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

    We have an issue with sale order stock.
    Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
    We need to get rid of this quant.
    I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
    Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
    If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
    Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
    (...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
    BR
    Csaba
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

  • Hi BC, I have an issue with BC. When the shopping cart is used it takes stock out of inventory and h

    Hi BC,
    I have an issue with BC. When the shopping cart is used it takes stock out of inventory and holds it, regardless of whether or not a customer proceeds to purchase. OK.
    To make matters worse, the stock is only cleared from the shopping cart when the customer closes the browser - not when they close the shopping window.
    Now lets say a customer doesn't close their browser for a month - it happens! .. when their stock is finally returned it may throw out our stock levels that have in the meanwhile been adjusted. So their stock will be added on top of an accurate stock take, putting stock in that isnt really available.
    This is causing us mayhem.
    We have not yet seen if stock is actually returned at all. In the test we did today where we filled a shopping cart then closed the browser without making a purchase, the stock was not returned immediately. So we dont even know when it will be returned - thats IF a customer actually closes their browser. Any solutions out there?
    Jo

    Hi there,
    The way stock is managed in this situation is desirable for many in that case otherwise shopping on a site and adding to cart would not be viable or use friendly.
    What you mention about not closing a browser though is a case that is not true. IF you go into the shop settings in the admin you can see the cart restore timer which is by default 24 hours but you can change this to as low as 1 hour if you wish.

  • Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.

    Hi Experts,
    we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
    We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
    For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure  0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
    { Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
    The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock  and  Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero.  Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
    Many Thanks in advance.
    Jeswanth

    Hi Srini,
    I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
    Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
    Let me explain with an example
    Material  : XYZ
    Plant      : A
    Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
    >  12th April 2009.
    So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
    Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
    At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
    So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
    Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
    and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
    opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
    So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
    Calendar Day     Total stock                                                                Received stock                                          Issued Stock         
    28.12.2005 --->  - 2640 EA
    29.12.2005 --->    2000 EA                                                                       640 EA                                                        0
    10.04.2009 --->      0                                                                                0                                                               2000 EA      
    11.04.2009 -
    >    0                                                                                0                                                                0          
                                 (For making
                                  the earlier record of  initilization to 0  a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
    12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) --->  2640 EA                                                 0                                                                0
    13.04.2009 
    the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values...  On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
    This is happening only if we use  both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF  for loading into BW.....
    If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
    Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
    Thanks.
    regards,
    Jeswanth

  • Q9550 and P45, issues with FSB anything over stock.

    I recently acquired Q9550 revision E0 cheap-ish (it's still new, not second hand) so I decided to switch my E8500 for it and see can I bump some extra juice out of it.
    Well, apparently I can't.
    So far I haven't managed to get it stable even at 400 FSB with memory divider 1:1.000, wich is rather strange to me. Tried even lowering the multiplier for CPU to 6 so it was way underclocked while adding more volts to it. 1.36 was the maximum I tried with no luck at all, disabling phase controls, greenpower, c1e and so on doesn't affect anything.
    Suggests to me that the board itself is refusing to pull FSB up, but few weeks back I were still running C2D with 420 and no problems at all.
    Different BIOS versions seem to have some kind of impact, initially I tried with latest official, 1.6 and with that I could get prime to run blend test for 10+ hrs easily, call of duty black ops crashed to windows within minutes tho'. 1.7b9 and the one I have now, 1.7b14 crash in prime95 under 5 seconds to BSOD.
    I know there's the possibility that this chip just doesn't want to take FSB, they are all inviduals and so on. Or that I've accidentally made something explode in my mobo.
    On stock settings \ everything on auto it runs like a charm, can play and run prime95\IBT until doomsday if I want to.
    So far I've given MCH 1.4 volts and VTTFSB has been at 1.3 max, tried loosening memory timings from 5-5-5-18 to pretty much anything. And this all CPU underclocked but it's a no go.
    MB: P45 Platinum bios 1.7b14
    CPU: Q9550 E0
    Mem: Corsair XMS2+ PC6400 (800MHz)
    PSU: OCZ Gamexstream 600W
    GPU: Asus GTX 460
    Now while Prime95 is doing blend-test on the background with stock speeds CPU-Z reports from 1.248 to 1.256 vcore and core temps are pretyt much 50 celsius each. Idles are from 28 to 34.

    I doubt very much it's the CPU. Also I have a similar system, except yours is a E0 chip Q9550 (should be better at overclocking) whilst mine is a C1 Q9450. Also I have a 5770 to your GTX 460. You've probably already read my settings and experience, but I'll chip in.
    My experience of instability on this board due to voltages and overclocking resulted in either a total system freeze, or prime fail. BSOD never happened unless it was a RAM (voltage, or overclocked too far) or driver error, especially the graphics card.
    ALSO - CHECK YOUR SATA CABLES! I was driven mad by a batch of bad SATA cables that came with my P45 Platinum. All of them were dodgy and had to be replaced. The contacts were thin and got flatterned easily. Man those sucky cables wasted a lot of my time thinking my overclock was unstabe.
    Place the jumpers back on the board - so it boots at 333.
    Reset the bios completely by cutting the power for five minutes, then using the jumper/reset switch.
    Enter bios
    Load optimized defaults - save and exit
    Run memtest86+ at default speeds - wait for one pass
    Reset and enter bios
    Disable Greenpower and Phase controls, C1E HALT and EIST for now.
    Set the safe and conservative voltages in my sig (except CPU, you may need higher or reduce your multiplier) and try setting 400 FSB
    MAKE SURE YOU SELECT THE 1600/800 1:1 divider AND NOT THE 1333/667 1:1
    Run memtest86+ again and see if it passes
    I can tell you with certainty, that 1.160v on the MCH Northbridge will be good all the way up to 440 at least, even touching on 450.
    VTT does not need to be higher than 1.21 for 400-450.
    Southbridge 1.52v, mem 1.9v will sail nearly all the way to 900Mhz with 5-5-5 enhanced setting on auto and 1:1 1600/800.
    CPU 1.225v can get you up to 3.6Ghz usually, perhaps less or a little more.
    All the other voltages (GREF etc) and timings on AUTO.
    It could be a driver problem, so I would run memtest86+ outside of windows first or test the system outside of windows in some other way (linux boot cd?). Also, it might be that the bios has chipset timings that your GTX 460 just doesn't like. :(

  • Freezing issues with MSI 970A-G43 and AMD FX 8320

    Hey all,
    I bought my brother a new system a few days ago, but he has had serious issues with the machine crashing ever since.
    The machine has had a fresh installation of Windows 7, it has all the latest drivers for both motherboard, sound, chipset and video card (Latest VGA driver tested as well as the latest Beta version)
    I thought the problem might be with the VGA card, as the computer would just shut off during 3d Gaming, but it also seems to happen when surfing the internet or doing normal "2d" activities
    What happens is the computer will just seemingly shut off, the LED lights on the front of the case, around the dials, start blinking and the only way to get it back up again, is to turn if off at the power supply unit and then turn it back on again.
    I'll paste in what my brother sent me (As I live in the UK and can't see the machine crashing myself), he said:
    I dunno what the issue is but, last night the comp just shut off in middle of game play on 3 different games, and the lights were flashing, I had to turn complete power off to the power box and back on to restart comp, I kept checking all my temps with speccy and speed fan and nothing seemed high at all, also when it shuts off and I re start it, a lot of my desktop icons move around to different spots,
    Update: crashed a few times on me, once playing euro, once just browsing Internet 5 min after the first one, changed out ram just for shots and giggles and ran euro on ultra for about 5 min and crashed. I dl a gpu monitor gadget, was accurate on temp but said the gpu was 0% but with just Internet would randomly jump to 99% or 40% then back to 0 and would stay and eventually crash
    Spec is:
    AMD FX-8320 3.5GHZ EIGHT CORE
    500GB SATA III 6GB/S 7200RPM 16MB
    COOLERMASTER SEIDON 120M WATER COOLER
    4Gb DDR3 / 1600 MHZ MEMORY
    MSI 970A-G43 AMD 970 CROSSFIRE AM3+ DDR3 USB 3.0 SATA
    CORSAIR 500 WATTS CX500 V2 80 PLUS POWER SUPPLY
    ASUS XONAR DG 5.1 CHANNELS PCI XONAR DG SOUND CARD
    AMD RADEON 7750 2GB PCI-E
    There was a concern I did have when I did search earlier, via a thread on Tomshardware in which a similiar board had issues with the FX8350's wattage going above the stated 125 watts and causing the board to freeze.
    It's a different board/chip, but I wonder if the wattage of the CPU goes above 125W and causes problems on the board? Hmm
    I feel really guilty right now, because I bought this for him as a present, it was $700ish plus shipping etc and it's been nothing but problems ever since.
    I'm going to see what version of Bios he's running when he gets out of bed, but the Live Update software said there were no updates, but I'll have him check manually.
    Another issue I noted, was I sent him some ram before the PC arrived, which was:
    XMS3 — 8GB Dual Channel DDR3 Memory Kit (CMX8GX3M2A1333C9)
    He originally put that ram in with the existing 4gb of ram, so I thought it "Might" be a conflict, due to them having a different Mhz value
    So I had him remove the 4gb stick that came with the PC
    As soon as he entered the bios, it froze and did so twice
    So he removed that ram and put back the original 4gb stick and the bios worked
    No idea if the two are related.

    I hope this doesn't count as necro-ing a thread (last post was in October), but it's the one closest to my situation.
    I have the following setup:
    MSI 970a-g43 motherboard
    AMD FX-6300 cpu
    ATI Radeon HD 4550 graphics card
    4x 2GB RAM sticks
    2x 500 GB 3.5" SATA hard drives
    CoolMax 700W psu
    16x r/rw DVD burner
    cheapo SD and others card reader that fits in the floppy drive bay
    Older PC tower that has a temperature sensor built into it
    I built it around November 15th, and it worked until a couple days ago (December 12th I think), when it started doing the sudden shut-off thing. Same as Adresch described: shuts off, tower light blinks, have to flip the i/o switch off and back on to boot again. I consulted a friend for some suggestions, and he said I should put a water cooler in there, because the stock heatsink that comes with most processors are junk. So I went out and bought a Corsair H55 water cooler and installed that.
    The computer seemed to run for a bit longer before shutting off. I loaded up the BIOS software, SpeedFan, and HWMonitor. SF said the CPU was running average of 48*C, and GPU was averaging 51*C. The CPU's highest was at 61*C and its lowest was 36*C. BIOS software said CPU was at 35*C the whole time. HWMonitor listed the GPU at 51*C, and the CPU at 7*C. These are all very inconsistent with each other as far as I can tell, so I don't know what to make of these readings. Didn't seem to much matter as the computer continued shutting off.
    My options then being replacing the PSU or the motherboard, I decided to replace the power supply, since I was just within the 30 days. Switched for a ThermalTake TR2 700W. Before installing it, I pulled the tower's CPU temperature sensor wire from between the water cooler heatsink and the CPU, just in case. Then I installed the PSU, checked and rechecked all of the connections, and turned it on.
    Nothing.
    I then spent the next two hours rechecking everything, even unplugging everything and putting it back together. Still nothing. The best I could get was a flicker of the tower light and the fans doing a quarter turn before ceasing movement. The red LED on the front of the SD card reader stayed on the entire time, though, so I guess it was getting at least a trickle of power. I also removed everything but the PSU, motherboard, CPU, and one stick of RAM. Still no power. I think the new PSU may have been open box, so I'm returning it today for a different one, and even bumping it up to 850W.
    I'm not sure that will solve my original issue though, so I'll be looking for a heatsink to put on the VRMS as mentioned. Just thought I'd get this down in a relevant thread in case anyone had other thoughts on what could be going on.

  • Multiple issues with new installation

    I have several issues with my fresh installation of arch (just got myself a free old-as laptop , thus trying out arch for the first time as I usually run gentoo), and I'm not sure where these should go. I figure that I may as well lump them all at once while I'm at it.
    The laptop model is a Toshiba Dynabook TX/430DX Japanese laptop similar to a Tecra A2 afaik.
    1. If I use stock ARCH kernel, when I load up x11 it seems to be using some wrong drivers or something. Tried with and without xorg.conf. The screen is all fuzzy etc. However, I compiled my own kernel (the Zen sources), took out a whole bunch of drivers I knew I wouldn't be using (etc. SATA/IDE/extra whatnot so that it would merely take 3 hours to compile the kernel), x11 works fine. HOWEVER with the zen sources, when I close x11 I can't exit to console. I get some sort of weird artefact from what happened to be on the screen, or it just goes black. It does actually seem to be in console as I can turn off the laptop with ctrl.alt.del and the capslock etc seems to work fine. I'm thinking of recompiling the zen sources with the stock arch kernel config when I have the time just to see what happens, but I'm not too sure it'd help.
    The VGA device is an: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Intergrated Graphics Device (rev 02), using the intelfb module.
    2. In most consoles I've used, if you type in part of a command then press ctrl.up/down, it autocompletes with previous commands you've run matching what you've already entered. However, in my install it brings me to the very first command in my bash history. How do I make it autocomplete previous commands?
    3. When I use wvdial (I have a mobile modem), I get odd characters as shown in the screenshot posted.
    I don't think it's a unicode issue, as ncmpcpp displays properly. This displays itself both in the console and in x11 (screenshot).
    4. If I'm using the stock kernel and I stop wvdial, I get a whole bunch of kernel error trace messages. After this, anything that goes to dmesg will be displayed to whatever terminal I'm on (but not actually echoed, it gets overwritten if I change screen etc). Wvdial is also prone to crashing, sometimes taking out the whole laptop. However, while using the zen kernel I do not suffer this issue at all.
    Any help in helping me find the source of these issues would be greatly appreciated. They're not showstopping issues, but extremely irritating nonetheless.
    Thanks in advance.
    EDIT: I created a zen kernel based on the arch stock kernel. Unsurprisingly, I still suffer from the x11 video issue. However, I don't have issues with number 4.
    Last edited by ugugii (2009-06-14 00:57:37)

    People are probably going to want to know the make/model of the lappy before they can
    help.
    Deej

  • Performance issue with brand new intel iMac extreme

    I am at a loss to explain a problem I've been having and I thought I might put it out to you guys.
    In September I purchased a macbook Pro (2.4 ghz, 4 GB RAM) to use in video editing with Final Cut Pro, and for the most part I've been thrilled. I use 1TB LaCie external drives connected via FW800, and perform Multiclip editing with 4-5 video streams at a time and only on occasion have dropped frames during the editing process.
    In December I determined that I needed to have an additional system, and thought a 2.8Ghz Intel iMac extreme would be an excellent choice, since for the same price I could get a little more power in the processor, more hard drive space and a bigger screen to work on. When we picked up the new system in the store (The Grove Apple Store in LA), we had them upgrade the memory to 4GB.
    Since day one we have had performance issues, including problems playing streaming and DVD video, severe delays mounting and unmounting drives (firewire and USB) and application images, and freezing while doing even simple tasks like printing or checking email. These problems occur even while there are no external drives are connected. I have none of these issues with the Macbook Pro, which has virtually an identical set of programs installed, and both running the same version of Leopard.
    I already took the original iMac back to the store, and they exchanged it, but did not have 4GB sets of RAM in stock so they took the RAM from the original machine and put it in the new one. They said if I continued to have problems then it was most likely the RAM and I should come back when they got more in stock. I DID have the same problems with the new machine, and took it back to the Apple Store and they swapped the memory. It seemed to improve the issue, but now I'm seeing the same severe performance issues again.
    All tech support can do is tell me to do a PRAM reset, which seems to improve things very temporarily (but that may be my imagination) or have me restart, which at least has the ability to make the printing of documents capable.
    What I'm wondering is if it is likely that the RAM is the issue and I just got another bad batch, or if the iMac has some weird glitch that isn't present in the macbook Pro...?? Or could I have possibly gotten 2 bad systems in a row? It's extremely frustrating, and I KNOW it shouldn't be this way! It's so bad I get better performance out of my single-core G5 tower! How do I get a good working system that operates like it should? Am I better off getting another Macbook Pro? I'd rather not for several reasons...
    I have xbench on both the MBP and the iMac and can provide test numbers if they'll help, as well as any other info.
    Thank you so much for reading my novella of a post and also for any insight you have!
    Best,
    Travis

    Hi!
    I got the same problem with my MacBook when it still was new in may 2006. It was supposed to be one of the faster Laptops around but it was soooo slow it drove me nuts. I can only advise to have a look if there is something hugging up your RAM and run some tests using these programs on your machine:
    Xbench:
    http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10081
    MenuMeters:
    http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10451
    If they show any unusual results you might have your problem...
    As to my problem with the MacBook: I did a complete re-install (writing the harddisk over with zeroes) and suddenly everything was just fine. (But be sure to back all your files before that, I learned this one the hard way.) I know it is just a standard answer, but it worked out for me this time...
    Hope this helps in some ways.
    Cheers,
    Rene

  • Production Order Issue with Qty conflict

    Hi Friends,
    i have a issue with a production order fro which we built the product and the finished goods is moved to storage location, i have status set on my Production order as REL  PRT  CNF  DLV  PRC  GMPS MACM SETC. My order was for 1unit,In the quantities window , total qty shows as 1 pc and delivered as nothing (blank). Its not active were physically i can change , so how do i add the deliverd qty field by 1.And what could be the issue? PLS help Points will be rewarded.

    This Delivered field in CO02-Dates/Qtys tab will get updated automatically , when the order qty is delivered to stock.
    We can not manually update that.
    Have you checked whether the storage location stock has been increased ? In MMBE , you place the cursor on the stock qty and choose Environment - Production orders or Material Movements and check , whether a GR has been made against this order.
    Regards,
    Sheik

  • Issue in Stock transfer

    Hi
    We have an issue in Stock Transfer. the Stock transfer happens between a manufacturing plant which is excise registered and a depot, which is not excise registered. We raise a Stock Transfer order from the depot on manufacturing plant with a freight component. The system creates a freight provision in the depot, when the goods issue is done by the manufacturing plant against the stock Transfer Order. After the goods issue the material is shown in Transit in report MB5T until the same is recieved by the depot. However, some goods are lost in transit and the same is recovered from the freight vendor. In such a case, we do a MIGO for the actual quantity recieved at depot and pass a debit note to vendor by loading the difference to material.
    The issue is:
    1. the quantity and the value of the physical inventory recieved have been rectified by a recovery from the vendor.
    2. However, how can we remove the goods, which we have short recieved from the report MB5T
    The certain work around  we have thought could be :
    1.  Receive the quantity in full at the recieveing Depot and then scrap the material to the extent it has been received short through M Type 551. However, the issue arises in case of transfer of goods from one manufacturing plant to another, where in both are excise registered. In such a case, goods receipt in full would not be correct as it would raise issues in excise registers.
    Please suggest
    Regards
    Sanil K Bhandari

    Hi,
    One suggestion is you can pass a document through MB1A for material loss in transit for the mateial lost.
    Followign accounting Entry would be hit :
    Transporter shrinkage Clearing Dr
    to Inventory Raw Mateial          Cr
    You can pass the same document through Mvt. Type 951 (GI Lost in Transit).
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

Maybe you are looking for