Issue with stocks on packagin unit?

Hi Experts,
User called in to report that he needs 2 stocks to be checked on Packaging Unit.User wants to check if they are available. User gave the stock # number also. Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.
Regards,
Sauryasen

Hi Kiran,
Thank you for your reply. As mentioned earlier the user has given the stock number only which is parsed with the catalog number. However no plant information has been provided though the used wants 2 stocks to be added on the packaging unit and wants to check if they are available. Please provide a solution if the query is clear.
Regards,
Edited by: SAURYASEN on Jun 9, 2010 12:04 PM

Similar Messages

Issue with stocks on packaging unit?

Hi Experts,
The issue is that the User called in to report that he needs 2 stocks to be checked on Packaging Unit.User wants to check if they are available. User gave the stock # number also. I want to understand what is the T-CODE is required for this stock updation or is there any other way to check the packaging units for stocks. Kindly help me to solve this issue.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Regards,

Just run MMBE for the material (or MD04).
Regards,
Nick

Issue with stock qty of component in Structured Articles in SAP BI

Dear Experts,
We are extracting stock in BI through SAP standard data source. We have used 2lis_03_bx and 2lis_03_bf data sources. We are facing issue with stock data validation due to structure articles (pre-pack) available in SAP source system.
We have stock of structure articles available at DC in source system. When we extract this information in BI, this article gets split into its components automatically. Due to which stock of components articles gets increased with huge amounts.
To analysis it in further detail, we have created below scenario:
Article Document Number: 4900000827
Article Number (Pre-pack): 300000082901
Article Number (Component): 300000082002
Stock of pre- pack article at this article document number: 174 pc
Stock of component article at this article document number: 348 pc (due to splitting of pre-pack article) + 151 (its own stock movement). Total stock for this article is 499. But actually total stock for this article should be 151 only.
As per our Business requirement, pre-pack article should not be split into its components. And stock in BI should be totally in sync with SAP stock.
I kindly request you to suggest the solution to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance.
--Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Check the OSS note L 1320386 - Frequently asked questions regarding BW Trade Foundation too.
Regards,
Rajesh

Issue with language settings and units

Hello All,
We are facing the issue where since yetsreday days our language sttings are not working anymore.
The characteristics which were loading fine before suddenly started giving error and now there are lot of issue with the special characters.
Since we have data in almost all the european languages and with the entries from there language specific keyboard therefore list of chars now cannot be maintained in the RSKC.
We did a lot of verification and there was no changes done and no transport related to language settings was done.
The settings maintained before was ALL_CAPITAL and it was working fine till yesterday.
We have raised an OSS message with SAP but still wanted to know if anyone is aware of the reason.
Thanks
Ajeet

Is this unicode issue ???
Check the below thread :
Loading data from Unicode R3 system to non unicode BW system
Hope this helps.
Edited by: Praveen G on Sep 16, 2008 3:12 AM

Facing Issue with Stock Ageing report

In Blocked Stock Ageing report Output, I am facing following issues
1. Stock is correct but once we include the "Reason For Movement" then the aging is getting wrong and in some cases value is coming Negative.
2. In some cases "Reason For Movement" is coming in ‘#’, but this is a mandatory field. Hence cannot be blank.
Note:
1. Overall stock is coming correct.
2. Reason Movement chat. is in free char
3. Report is based 0IC_C03.

Hi Nadeem,
Reason for Movement is loading from what attribute? check in RSRV for that attribute.
RSRV-->All Elementary Tests ->Master Data ->Compare Size of P-, Q- with X- and Y- Tables respectively .
If it has any error then correct that error in RSRV. It will solve your problem.
Regards,
Rajesh

Issue with Stock

Hi
Sometimes I am facing this issue. In MMBE and LX03 bin against particular material, stock will be there and in the table if u check stock will be there. When I do stock transfer from bin to bin it is showing no stock.
Material is not deleted.
Thanks....
Raja

Hi,
Check the stock status for that material in both MMBE & LS26.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.

Issue with Mvt type 311

Hi friends,
I have a issue with stock transfer from one storage location to another with transaction MB1B using movement type 311.
When ever we transfer stock for a material, it transfers from unrestricted to quality restricted stock. eg. if a trasfer from 0001 sloc to 0002 sloc, then it will transfer 0001 unrestricted to 0002 quality inspection.
Can plese some one tell me where these settings are maintained?
Thanks,
Rohit

Hello,
This is not the SAP Standard Practice,
While transfer of material from one storage location another stoarge location thorugh 311 movement type, the stock type should be same in both the storage locations.
you can directly transfer from Unrestricted 0001 storage location to 0002 Storage location (quality inspection), before that you should match both stock type , through respective movement type 321 or 322.
then you can transfer one storage location to another (stock type should be same)
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Reporting an audio/video issue with a TV show from a Season Pass? How?

I would like to report some audio/video issues with the latest The Unit and The Seeker episodes but I can't find them in my Purchase History??? I own a Season Pass for both. Any idea how to do it? I'm lost. Thanks!

Is this the lack of audio on "Shadow Riders"? I've just got to that episode, and I tried to report the problem, but the whole series of hoops you have to jump through seems to have changed. Rather than get to the page where you add comments for the problems, it merely sends you to an internet link on apple that has no bearing on the problem.
If you open your account information (store > View my account) you can click your purchase history there. The theory is that you find your program, click the arrow next to it, then click "report a problem" and it should allow you to enter a comment, or the problem... Anyone else having this troubvle?

Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

We have an issue with sale order stock.
Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
We need to get rid of this quant.
I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
Thanks

Hi,
You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
(...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

Hi BC, I have an issue with BC. When the shopping cart is used it takes stock out of inventory and h

Hi BC,
I have an issue with BC. When the shopping cart is used it takes stock out of inventory and holds it, regardless of whether or not a customer proceeds to purchase. OK.
To make matters worse, the stock is only cleared from the shopping cart when the customer closes the browser - not when they close the shopping window.
Now lets say a customer doesn't close their browser for a month - it happens! .. when their stock is finally returned it may throw out our stock levels that have in the meanwhile been adjusted. So their stock will be added on top of an accurate stock take, putting stock in that isnt really available.
This is causing us mayhem.
We have not yet seen if stock is actually returned at all. In the test we did today where we filled a shopping cart then closed the browser without making a purchase, the stock was not returned immediately. So we dont even know when it will be returned - thats IF a customer actually closes their browser. Any solutions out there?
Jo

Hi there,
The way stock is managed in this situation is desirable for many in that case otherwise shopping on a site and adding to cart would not be viable or use friendly.
What you mention about not closing a browser though is a case that is not true. IF you go into the shop settings in the admin you can see the cart restore timer which is by default 24 hours but you can change this to as low as 1 hour if you wish.

Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.

Hi Experts,
we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure 0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
{ Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock and Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero. Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
Many Thanks in advance.
Jeswanth

Hi Srini,
I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
Let me explain with an example
Material : XYZ
Plant      : A
Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
> 12th April 2009.
So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
Calendar Day     Total stock                                                                Received stock                                          Issued Stock
28.12.2005 ---> - 2640 EA
29.12.2005 --->    2000 EA                                                                       640 EA                                                        0
10.04.2009 --->      0                                                                                0                                                               2000 EA
11.04.2009 -
>    0                                                                                0                                                                0
                             (For making
                              the earlier record of initilization to 0 a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) ---> 2640 EA                                                 0                                                                0
13.04.2009
the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values... On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
This is happening only if we use both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF for loading into BW.....
If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
Thanks.
regards,
Jeswanth

PO outbound IDOC - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu

Sorry.. Posting it in ABAP Development forum.

PO outbound interface - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu
Edited by: shahuraj shirure on Mar 5, 2008 1:06 AM

Its always that while sending Units from SAP, it needs to be sent in ISO code and SAP always receives units of measure in the ISO unit format only.

Big issues with Leopard and writing to NAS units or Windows servers

Quick run down of the issues
1st client has a number of G5's all running 10.5.2
NAS units running embedded Windows SBS 2003 or Windows Storage .
All shares have worked fine before the macs were upgraded to Leopard.
Now the macs can see the shares, mount and write to the folders. But immediately afterwards all inherited permissions are stripped from the folders/files and only the owner of the file/folder can access them. All other mac users have no access. It seems that Leopard is ignoring the inherited permissions of the share and just applying its own.
2nd Client
Number of imacs running 10.5.2. Can see the mac shares on the server running Windows SBS 2003 fine. The minute any files are copied you get the progress of the items being copied, seems to appear on the server and then just hangs.
In most circumstances the copying crashes the whole server.
Have tried binding the imacs to AD, but no joy. SMB sharing (with Appletalk turned off) dosent help either.
Somewhere there seems to be some gremlins with AFP and windows shares
Anyone have similar issues or bright ideas ?

Alright I'm running into the same issue with my iMac 10.5.2 connecting to windows server 2003 r2. I'm about to go nuts, I can log on to the server, open files manipulate them and sometimes I'm able to save that file back to server but I'm unable to transfer almost anything new to the server, (I can create new folders though). When you try to transfer something to the server I get "progress of the items being copied, seems to appear on the server"... then it hangs, a corrupt file is left on the server. If you try and open that file I get an error message on my mac, "OS X is currently using this file" on a pc it will say the file is corrupt. I'm forced to carry my psd files on a flash drive and walk to coworkers machines to upload it to the server... (haven't had time to set up parallels). I'm the only mac in the office and I'm seeing why I've been so spoiled at past jobs where its 100% macs.

X-Fi unit issues with Win 7

I have a SB X-fi Xtreme unit in my system. It was running XPsp3 and ran just fine. Upgraded to Win 7 home premium. Now some video files have issues with the sound tracks but music seems to be okay. Itunes seems to play my music just fine (although a couple of things may be boarderline - hearing sux LOL). I can't narrow it down to any particular video type since it happens on FLV, MPG, MOV and other extensions. VLC and MS MP both show these issues. Playing stuff on Youtube and elsewhere acts up. I am running the creative 8/3 release 5.2..208. I went to the website and tried the dri've upgrade available ?but it errors out saying that it does not find a device. I also installed various codecs since I figured that might be a cause. Any help is welcome. BTW I am running 32bit.
EDIT
I have also downloaded both:
XFXA_PCDRV_LB__04_0000.exe and
XFXA_PCDRV_LB__04_0090.exe
version 0000 gives me a message that it'scould not find a?device type?error and closes
version 0090 didn't complete (I waited 5 minutes and there was no disk activity - task manager said it was working) under normal mode
I then ran 0090 under XP sp3?compatibility and got a 'driver not found' error.

CS2 is totally unsupported under Win 7. And if you have 6 gigs of RAM I'll guess that it's a 64 bit system which simply adds to the complexity.
Sorry, but the best advice you'll get is to upgrade.
Bob

Issue with stocks on packagin unit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for