Issue with UPDATE/INSERT Loading type

Hi ,
i am using the owb11g
all that i am trying to do is load in to Target table using update/insert loading type.
there are duplicates in the src table, and i have PK defined on the Target table.
when ever i execute the mapping it says NO DATA TO READ FROM SOCKET.
what is the solution? can there be a better way of doing this?
please help

why do you keep posting duplicate posts for the same problem?
Please continue with your post (link below)
No more data to read from socket

Similar Messages

INSERT Loading Type not working correctly?

Hi,
I'm using ver. 9.2.0.2.8 for the owb client, and ver. 9.2.0.2 for the repository. I'm currently encountering this problem when using the INSERT loading type for loading data into one of my staging tables. It's a simple simple mapping really:
I have a source table (A) that maps to a filter operator, which is then mapped to a staging table(B).
The problem is, when I run the mapping to INSERT data from A into an already populated B, not all the desired records are inserted. Weird thing is, when I run the code from generating the intermediate result in TOAD or whatever, I get the desired results. So that kinda rules out any doubts on the select statement generated by OWB.
Out of 23 records I get like 6.. just 6 of the 23 records I was hoping to be inserted into B.
And yes, none of the remaining 17 records are present in A, so INSERT should (ideally) work fine and carry out inserting all the 23 records.
Any ideas? ..

Hi JP,
Thank you very much for helpin out, I tried what you told me and here's what I got:
Starting Execution STG_MAP_FILTER_DCS_IRREG
Starting Task STG_MAP_FILTER_DCS_IRREG
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P012
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (RTOWNER.FK_RTER_RTA) violated - parent key not found
ORA-06512: at "RTOWNER.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT", line 338
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at "RTOWNER.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT", line 1736
ORA-06512: at "RTOWNER.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT", line 2625
ORA-06512: at "TOPSSTAGE.STG_MAP_FIL_R_TGT0_719337", line 1443
ORA-06512: at "TOPSSTAGE.STG_MAP_FIL_R_TGT0_719337", line 2076
ORA-06512: at "TOPSSTAGE.STG_MAP_FILTER_DCS_IRREG", line 482
ORA-06512: at "TOPSSTAGE.STG_MAP_FILTER_DCS_IRREG", line 813
ORA-06512: at line 1
Completing Task STG_MAP_FILTER_DCS_IRREG
Completing Execution STG_MAP_FILTER_DCS_IRREG
..I wonder what it means, hehe.

Issue with Update of Table VARINUM

Hi,
I am getting waiting Issues with Update of table VARINUM. Has anybody faced such an issue.
I have a lot of Jobs which are running in background. I am submitting it through a report. what can be the issue.
Regards,
Abhishek jolly

Thisi is quite old, but not answered properly yet, so there you go:
SAP generates a new job and temporary variant on report RSDBSPJS, for each HTTP call,which creates database locks on table VARINUM .
This causes any heavyweight BSP application to hang and give timeout errors.
The problem is fixed applying OSS note 1791958, which is not included in any service pack.

Any other realtors having issues with updating their Suprakey on their Android?

Any other realtors having issues with updating their Suprakey on their Android?

The follow is from clicking on that error number in the article cited at the end of my post:
Error 3194: Resolve error 3194 by updating to the latest version of iTunes. "This device is not eligible for the requested build" in the updater logs confirms this is the root of the issue. For more Error 3194 steps see: This device is not eligible for the requested build above.
iOS: Resolving update and restore alert messages

Having issue with update Adobe 11.0.06. Error 1603.

Having issue with update Adobe 11.0.06. Error 1603.

You should have gotten this information with the error: "Shut down Microsoft Office and all web browsers. Then, in Acrobat or Reader, choose Help > Check for Updates. See also Error 1603 | Install | CS3, CS4 products." Also, be sure you log in as the administrator and disable anti-virus.

Having issues with update to iOS 8

Having issues with update to iOS 8, wheel keeps spinning with 9 hrs remaining to complete update. What are my options?
<Re-Titled By Host>

I am a windows/mac user... And I was Linux user for several years... And so far I have been really happy with apple but this problem is frustrating.
I don't understand:
1)Why can't I go back to iOS7 since this was apparently the most stable version for my iPad ?
2) Why is apple not doing anything about it, ?
3) If the problem is that my iPad's can't fully support the features of iOS8, why on earth have they made it available to iPad 2?
Any way, I will just wait a bit longer and probably start looking in to a Samsung tablet or something....
Cheers,

Problems with update/insert and the ON clause

I have two rather identical mappings, both supporting SCD Type II. One of them works, the other one doesn't.
As in the SCD whitepaper, I have a split, that ultimately ends in a union, and then UPDATE/INSERTs into the target dimension. My problem is, that though using the matching_id for matching in one mapping, it is not allowed in the second mapping. The error is ORA-38104: The columns refererred in the ON-Clause cannot be updated "MyTable.MyId" (all loosely translated).
I just don't understand it, as it should be able to match the ID, and if not found, create a new record using INSERT.
I found a description of the error that sounded like this (https://cwisdb.cc.kuleuven.ac.be/ora10doc/server.101/b10744/e38001.htm):
ORA-38104: Columns referenced in the ON Clause cannot be updated: string
Cause: LHS of UPDATE SET contains the columns referenced in the ON Clause
Action: none
I just don't understand how this can be a problem, since I have to carry the surrogate key along, in order to assure that the proper records gets updated...
Anyone who can enlighten me on this one?
Regards
Kim

Oh yes :) I was a quite active participant. What puzzles me is, that I cannot get mapping #2 to work. I have tried to do everything virtually alike, with regards to the surrogate key, and the extra mapping column.
My setting for the keys are as below:
Surrogate Matching
Load column when inserting: yes no
Load column when updating: yes no
Match column when updating: no yes
Load column when deleting: no no
Table best viewed in notepad :)
It "feels" like it's trying to update the surrogate key, instead of actually matching.
Regards
Kim

Issue with updating Security Info on my Microsoft ID

I am stuck in a vicious circle trying to sort an issue with my Microsoft account.
I need to remove an old, defunct, email address and add a load of new security info however, depending on whether the date format on the page I keep being directed to is UK or US, either the updates haven’t happened or they won’t
be happening until next month – which seems ridiculous!
I’m trying to sign up for a Windows Store developer account to publish a Windows 8 app. I’m using my MSDN subscription to register for this (for free) but there is a step I can’t get past because it insists on sending a code to
my old email address – to which I have no access. It is picking up this address from my Microsoft Account Security info – however, I updated this info weeks ago. This is the screen I see (I’ve blurred out some of it as it seemed foolish to publish all my security
info J
It says my old address will be removed on 03/04/2013 and my new info added on that same date. Does anyone know if this is UK date format 3rd April – in which case it’s a long wait or a US date 4th
March in which case it didn’t happen? I’ve tried phoning 5000 and the Microsoft Customer support lines but neither of them have a clue where to start. They just keep asking me if I’ve forgotten my password – which I haven’t.
Does anyone know how I can resolve this? My only option at the moment is to wait until 3rd of April and see if anything changes – which is not ideal.
Cheers,
Rob

Hello,
The Microsoft account forum has been retired and all account related questions must now be asked online
here.
Select the issue you need help with and fill out the requested details on the next page.
You need to be signed in with a Microsoft account to access the form. If you are unable to access your primary account, you can use an alternate account (if you have one) or create a new one at
https://signup.live.com
You can read further information about blocked accounts
here.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book:
Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C406F75746C6F6F6B2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

I'm using Firefox 3.6.23 on my windows 2000 and lately i've been having issues with web pages loading and need help figuring out why.

Some of the issues : '''1'''. Page loads blank showing web address in tab. Try reloading usually with no results.(problem have the most!) '''2'''. Message appears "problem loading page, server not found" (diff times & diff websites). '''3.''' Pg with msg "oops link broke, DNS error, server not found" then lists suggested links to sites for fix though all links connect to site IGEARED.COM. (new issue) I don't know what to do please help me identify and fix my issue(s) in english, kind of a newbie : ). thx

Try this.
Type in the address bar about:config.
Accept the warning.
In the page that appears, in the Filter box, type network.http.max-connections. Change the value to 32 (which is probably set to 256 in your case).
Close that page. Restart the browser.

Issue with update to 10.6.5 and WIFI connection

I have been having an ongoing issue with my MBP over the last 6 months and even more consistently within the last several weeks.
I have searched the other posts and I think that I might be making a connection here. So, please chime in if you have anything to add to solving or addressing my problem as I think that there are others out there suffering.
Issue in short: Waking my MBP from sleep mode or turning it on loses my connection to my WIFI that is password protected.
Mainly when I wake my MBP from sleep mode this occurs a lot.
I have contacted AppleCare many times and have taken my computer to the Genius guys and I have done the following:::
Genius guys tested the computer and could not replicate. No hardware issues found, must be a software issue.
AppleCare, done many things to reset the computer, re-installed Snow Leopard, deleted Caches and other things.
Now, I am wondering if there is something actually due to the OS updates after 10.6.2 or 10.6.3 that is causing my issue that much more.
I can see my wireless router as available to join, I select it, type in my password, and it states invalid password. Try to restart, reboot, and nothing. It almost appears that it loses the sync between my keychain and such.
As of late, as I stated, the problem is more persistent now.
What do you think? An issue with the latest updates of 10.6.5?

I too often have a devil of a time connecting to a Linksys WiFi router with a brand-new unibody MacBook Pro 15", 2.66GHz. I noticed that if I boot the machine off an external Firewire drive this seems to be more of an issue than if I boot off the internal drive.
I beginning to thing there's some kind of interference between the Firewire system and the WiFi system.
The router is a Linksys with the latest firmware update. My MacBook and iPhone 3G, iPhone 4 connect to the router fine.

Issue with updating partitioned table

Hi,
Anyone seen this bug with updating partitioned tables.
Its very esoteric - its occurs when we update a partitioned table using a join to a temp table (not non-temp table) when the join has multiple joins and you're updating the partitoned column that isn't the first column in the primary key and the table contains a bit field. We've tried changing just one of these features and the bug disappears.
We've tested this on 15.5 and 15.7 SP122 and the error occurs in both of them.
Here's the test case - it does the same operation of a partitioned table and a non-partitioned table, but the partitioned table shows and error of "Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'".
I'd be interested if anyone has seen this and has a version of Sybase without the issue.
Unfortunately when it happens on a replicated table - it takes down rep server.
CREATE TABLE #table1
 ( PK char(8) null,
 FileDate date,
 changed bit
CREATE TABLE partitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
LOCK DATAROWS
PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
LOCAL INDEX
CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
LOCK DATAROWS
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
insert partitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert unpartitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert #table1
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
union all
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
go
update partitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
update unpartitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
drop table #table1
go
drop table partitioned
drop table unpartitioned
go

wrt to replication - it is a bit unclear as not enough information has been stated to point out what happened. I also am not sure that your DBA's are accurately telling you what happened - and may have made the problem worse by not knowing themselves what to do - e.g. 'losing' the log points to fact that someone doesn't know what they should. You can *always* disable the replication secondary truncation point and resync a standby system, so claims about 'losing' the log are a bit strange to be making.
wrt to ASE versions, I suspect if there are any differences, it may have to do with endian-ness and not the version of ASE itself. There may be other factors.....but I would suggest the best thing would be to open a separate message/case on it.
Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.7/EBF 23010 SMP SP130 /P/X64/Windows Server/ase157sp13x/3819/64-bit/OPT/Fri Aug 22 22:28:21 2014:
-- testing with tinyint
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed tinyint
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned
-- duplicating with 'int'
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed int
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned

Issues with ondemand Data loader

Hello,
We are facing 2 issues with on demand data loader.
Issue 1
While inserting 'Contacts' and 'Assets' if the 'Account' information is wrong, the records are created with out accounts even though "Account" is a required field.
Issue 2
While inserting records data loader is not checking for duplicates. So duplicate records are getting created.
Kindly advise if anyone has come across similar issues. Thanks
Dipu
Edited by: user11097775 on Jun 20, 2011 11:46 PM

Hello,
We are facing 2 issues with on demand data loader.
Issue 1
While inserting 'Contacts' and 'Assets' if the 'Account' information is wrong, the records are created with out accounts even though "Account" is a required field.
Issue 2
While inserting records data loader is not checking for duplicates. So duplicate records are getting created.
Kindly advise if anyone has come across similar issues. Thanks
Dipu
Edited by: user11097775 on Jun 20, 2011 11:46 PM

Issues with updating!! Help!!

I got the App 200 Error and am trying to update the OS, but my desktop manager keeps saying that I have connection issues with the internet and won't let me update. Is there something I can do??

Are you doing a web-based upgrade or are you going through the BlackBerry Desktop Software?
If you have tried both of those options, and are still having issues have a look at the link below. This link will explain how to perform a clean application load of the BlackBerry device Software.
How to perform a clean reload of the BlackBerry Device Software using BlackBerry Desktop Manager for Windows - KB11320
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB11320
Hope this helps.

Performance issues with Planning data load & Agg in 11.1.2.3.500

We recently upgraded from 11.1.1.3 to 11.1.2.3. Post upgrade we face performance issues with one of our Planning job (eg: Job E). It takes 3x the time to complete in our new environment (11.1.2.3) when compared to the old one (11.1.1.3). This job loads then actual data and does the aggregation. The pattern which we noticed is , if we run a restructure on the application and execute this job immediately it gets completed as the same time as 11.1.1.3. However, in current production (11.1.1.3) the job runs in the following sequence Job A->Job B-> Job C->Job D->Job E and it completes on time, but if we do the same test in 11.1.2.3 in the above sequence it take 3x the time . We dont have a window to restructure the application to before running Job E every time in Prod. Specs of the new Env is much higher than the old one.
We have Essbase clustering (MS active/passive) in the new environment and the files are stored in the SAN drive. Could this be because of this? has any one faced performance issues in the clustered environment?

Do you have exactly same Essbase config settings and calculations performing AGG ? . Remember something very small like UPDATECALC ON/OFF can make a BIG difference in timing..

Performance issues with data warehouse loads

We have performance issues with our data warehouse load ETL process. I have run
analyze and dbms_stats and checked database environment. What other things can I do to optimize performance? I cannot use statspack since we are running Oracle 8i. Thanks
Scott

Hi,
you should analyze the db after you have loaded the tables.
Do you use sequences to generate PKs? Do you have a lot of indexex and/or triggers on the tables?
If yes:
make sure your sequence caches (alter sequence s cache 10000)
Drop all unneeded indexes while loading and disable trigger if possible.
How big is your Redo Log Buffer? When loading a large amount of data it may be an option to enlarge this buffer.
Do you have more then one DBWR Process? Writing parallel can speed up things when a checkpoint is needed.
Is it possible using a direct load? Or do you already direct load?
Dim

Issue with UPDATE/INSERT Loading type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for