Issue with Update of Table VARINUM

Hi,
I am getting waiting Issues with Update of table VARINUM. Has anybody faced such an issue.
I have a lot of Jobs which are running in background. I am submitting it through a report. what can be the issue.
Regards,
Abhishek jolly

Thisi is quite old, but not answered properly yet, so there you go:
SAP generates a new job and temporary variant on report RSDBSPJS, for each HTTP call,which creates database locks on table VARINUM .
This causes any heavyweight BSP application to hang and give timeout errors.
The problem is fixed applying OSS note 1791958, which is not included in any service pack.

Similar Messages

Issue with updating partitioned table

Hi,
Anyone seen this bug with updating partitioned tables.
Its very esoteric - its occurs when we update a partitioned table using a join to a temp table (not non-temp table) when the join has multiple joins and you're updating the partitoned column that isn't the first column in the primary key and the table contains a bit field. We've tried changing just one of these features and the bug disappears.
We've tested this on 15.5 and 15.7 SP122 and the error occurs in both of them.
Here's the test case - it does the same operation of a partitioned table and a non-partitioned table, but the partitioned table shows and error of "Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'".
I'd be interested if anyone has seen this and has a version of Sybase without the issue.
Unfortunately when it happens on a replicated table - it takes down rep server.
CREATE TABLE #table1
 ( PK char(8) null,
 FileDate date,
 changed bit
CREATE TABLE partitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
LOCK DATAROWS
PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
LOCAL INDEX
CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
PK char(8) NOT NULL,
ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
LOCK DATAROWS
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
insert partitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert unpartitioned
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
insert #table1
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
union all
select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
go
update partitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
update unpartitioned
set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
from #table1 t
inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
and t.changed = 1
go
drop table #table1
go
drop table partitioned
drop table unpartitioned
go

wrt to replication - it is a bit unclear as not enough information has been stated to point out what happened. I also am not sure that your DBA's are accurately telling you what happened - and may have made the problem worse by not knowing themselves what to do - e.g. 'losing' the log points to fact that someone doesn't know what they should. You can *always* disable the replication secondary truncation point and resync a standby system, so claims about 'losing' the log are a bit strange to be making.
wrt to ASE versions, I suspect if there are any differences, it may have to do with endian-ness and not the version of ASE itself. There may be other factors.....but I would suggest the best thing would be to open a separate message/case on it.
Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.7/EBF 23010 SMP SP130 /P/X64/Windows Server/ase157sp13x/3819/64-bit/OPT/Fri Aug 22 22:28:21 2014:
-- testing with tinyint
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed tinyint
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned
-- duplicating with 'int'
1> use demo_db
1>
2> CREATE TABLE #table1
3> ( PK char(8) null,
4> FileDate date,
5> -- changed bit
6> changed int
7> )
8>
9> CREATE TABLE partitioned (
10> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
11> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
12> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL
13> )
14>
15> LOCK DATAROWS
16> PARTITION BY RANGE (ValidTo)
17> ( p2014 VALUES <= ('20141231') ON [default],
18> p2015 VALUES <= ('20151231') ON [default],
19> pMAX VALUES <= (MAX) ON [default]
20> )
21>
22> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
23> ON partitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
24> LOCAL INDEX
25>
26> CREATE TABLE unpartitioned (
27> PK char(8) NOT NULL,
28> ValidFrom date DEFAULT current_date() NOT NULL,
29> ValidTo date DEFAULT '31-Dec-9999' NOT NULL,
30> )
31> LOCK DATAROWS
32>
33> CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX pk
34> ON unpartitioned(PK, ValidFrom, ValidTo)
35>
36> insert partitioned
37> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
38>
39> insert unpartitioned
40> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 7 2015", "Dec 31 9999"
41>
42> insert #table1
43> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
44> union all
45> select "ET00jPzh", "Jan 15 2015", 1
(1 row affected)
(1 row affected)
(2 rows affected)
1>
2> update partitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join partitioned p on (p.PK = t.PK)
6> where p.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 6:
Server 'PHILLY_ASE', Line 2:
Attempt to insert duplicate key row in object 'partitioned' with unique index 'pk'
Command has been aborted.
(0 rows affected)
1>
2> update unpartitioned
3> set ValidTo = dateadd(dd,-1,FileDate)
4> from #table1 t
5> inner join unpartitioned u on (u.PK = t.PK)
6> where u.ValidTo = '99991231'
7> and t.changed = 1
(1 row affected)
1>
2> drop table #table1
1>
2> drop table partitioned
3> drop table unpartitioned

Issue with updation of table BBP_PDBEI

Hello,
I am facing a strange issue. I created an extended classic PO. It is properly replicated in the backend. But the table BBP_PDBEI is not getting filled. The only details I found in BBP_PD were BE_OBJECT_TYPE as BUS2201 and BE_OBJECT_ID as 1. BBP_GET_STATUS_2 seems to work fine.
If I execute function module BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC using the GUID of PO which is already transferred to backend, then the table BBP_PDBEI is updated properly.
Therefore, everytime I need to update the PO using FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC. Ideally, it should happen automatically.
Any suggesstions?
Thanks,
Arun Singh

Hi,
It appears to be more a BBP_GET_STATUS program issue.
You can do 2 things:
1) Execute Report BBP_GET_STATUS_2 manually & then check BBP_PD for the particular PO.
2) You may also look for spools (Log) for the GET STATUS job in tcode SM37. Look for any errors listed.
Cheers,
Akash

Issue with data dictionary -Table maintanance generator

Hi all,
I have an issue with Data dictionary, table maintenance generator. I have entered some records in a custom table (ZBCSECROLETOGRP) and changed the delivery class from C to A. When I create the table maintainance generator, I am encountered with the following errors:
1)Field ZBCSECROLETOGRP-PORTALGROUP shortened (new visible length: 000032)
2)0012 could not be generated
3)In TCTRL_ZBCSECROLETOGRP field LENGTH has the invalid value 01
My main motto is to create the table maintainace generator and transport to the furthur systems .
Please help.
ThnX in advance,
Vishal..

HI,
Regenerate the table maintenance by selecting the checkbox of "Modified field structure" => new entry & then save.
Also ensure that the new changes are not affecting old data bcz of data type changes. If that is the case, then delete the old records, regenerate table maint. & re-enter those records which you had deleted.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Prashant

Any other realtors having issues with updating their Suprakey on their Android?

Any other realtors having issues with updating their Suprakey on their Android?

The follow is from clicking on that error number in the article cited at the end of my post:
Error 3194: Resolve error 3194 by updating to the latest version of iTunes. "This device is not eligible for the requested build" in the updater logs confirms this is the root of the issue. For more Error 3194 steps see: This device is not eligible for the requested build above.
iOS: Resolving update and restore alert messages

Having issue with update Adobe 11.0.06. Error 1603.

Having issue with update Adobe 11.0.06. Error 1603.

You should have gotten this information with the error: "Shut down Microsoft Office and all web browsers. Then, in Acrobat or Reader, choose Help > Check for Updates. See also Error 1603 | Install | CS3, CS4 products." Also, be sure you log in as the administrator and disable anti-virus.

Having issues with update to iOS 8

Having issues with update to iOS 8, wheel keeps spinning with 9 hrs remaining to complete update. What are my options?
<Re-Titled By Host>

I am a windows/mac user... And I was Linux user for several years... And so far I have been really happy with apple but this problem is frustrating.
I don't understand:
1)Why can't I go back to iOS7 since this was apparently the most stable version for my iPad ?
2) Why is apple not doing anything about it, ?
3) If the problem is that my iPad's can't fully support the features of iOS8, why on earth have they made it available to iPad 2?
Any way, I will just wait a bit longer and probably start looking in to a Samsung tablet or something....
Cheers,

CVC creation - Strange issue with Master data table of 9AMATNR

Hi Experts,
We have encountered a strange issue with Master data table (/BI0/9APMATNR) of info object 9AMATNR.
We have a BADI implemented for checking the valid Characteristic before creation of the CVC using transaction /SAPAPO/MC62. This BADI puts a select on master data tab of material /BI0/9APMATNR and returns no value. But the material actually exists in the table (checked through SE16).
Now we go inside the info object 9AMATNR and go to the Master data Tab. There we go inside the master table
/BI0/9APMATNR and activate that. After activating the table it is read by the select statement inside BADI (Strange) and allows the CVC to be created.
Ideally it should not allow us to activate the SAP standard table /BI0/9APMATNR. I observed that in technical settings of this table it has single record buffering as switched on. (But as per my knowledge buffer gets refreshed every 2 to 4 mins and not in 2 days or something).
Your expert comment is valuable to us. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Chandan Dubey

Hi Chandan,
Try to use a WAIT statment with 5 seconds before your select statment.
I'm not sure whether this will work. Anyway check it and let me know the result.
Regards,
Siva.

Performence issue with Update

hi all,
I am facing issue with below update statemetn. taking huge time to update. in xx__TEMP table I have index on Project id column. and all underlying table hase index.
Please look into plan and let me how I can reduce Cost for the blow update statement.
Thanks in advance.
UPDATE dg2.ODS_PROJ_INFO_LOOKUP_TEMP o
SET Months_In_Stage_Cnt =
(SELECT
NVL(ROUND(MONTHS_BETWEEN(SYSDATE,x.project_event_actual_date),2),0) Months_In_Stage_Cnt
FROM od.project_event x
WHERE x.project_id = o.project_id
AND event_category_code = 'G'
AND project_event_seq_nbr =
(SELECT MAX(project_event_seq_nbr)
FROM od.project_event y
WHERE y.project_id = x.project_id
AND y.event_category_code = 'G'
AND y.project_event_actual_date IS NOT NULL
AND stage_nbr <> 0
AND y.project_event_seq_nbr <
(SELECT project_event_seq_nbr
FROM od.project_event z
WHERE stage_nbr =
(SELECT current_stage_nbr
FROM od.project
WHERE project_id = x.project_Id )
AND z.project_id = x.project_Id
AND z.event_category_code = 'G'
AND skip_stage_ind = 'N'
AND project_event_actual_date IS NULL )
Plan
UPDATE STATEMENT CHOOSECost: *1,195,213* Bytes: 71,710,620 Cardinality: 41,213
14 UPDATE DG2.ODS_PROJ_INFO_LOOKUP_TEMP
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE DG2.ODS_PROJ_INFO_LOOKUP_TEMP Cost: 36 Bytes: 71,710,620 Cardinality: 41,213
13 FILTER
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OD.PROJECT_EVENT Cost: 9 Bytes: 104 Cardinality: 8
2 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) od.XPKPROJECT_EVENT Cost: 3 Cardinality: 8
12 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
11 FILTER
5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE od.PROJECT_EVENT Cost: 9 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
4 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) od.XPKPROJECT_EVENT Cost: 3 Cardinality: 8
10 FILTER
7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE od.PROJECT_EVENT Cost: 9 Bytes: 108 Cardinality: 6
6 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) od.XPKPROJECT_EVENT Cost: 3 Cardinality: 8
9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE od.PROJECT Cost: 2 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
8 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) od.XPKPROJECT Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
Thanks
Deb

882134 wrote:
Can any body give me some light why upto Select statement cost is ok, but only Update statemet is take huge 11m costing.
thanks
DebOkay so completely ignore the content of the 2 forum posts.
Why is the cost an issue for you? Without your tables, data and environment, and without a readable execution plan it's difficult to help you.
Maybe you could read the link I gave you and post some of the information it talks about up here.
p.s. read the link.

Issue with Period Control Table after copying Essbase adapter

Hi Experts,
I'm working on version 11.1.1.3 and have copied the adapters (Essbase, Pull + EPRi) in the work bench so I can add an additional target for the FDM application. However, I have an issue with the import process; it returns an error with the Time & Periods (I guess it's something to do with the Periods category).
I have reimported the Periods Control Table and updated the new application's Target Period & Year (whilst changing the system code in the Application settings to the newl adapter) and still receive the same error message.
Any direction or thoughts would be welcome.
Thanks
Mark

The time periods do not copy. You need to maintain them through the UI or upload them from excel. There is a KM article on this if you need additional detail.

Issues with update rule

Hi All,
I am having a problem with update rule
My object
A
B
C
D(Seller phase) (complex table)
Q1(Question)
A1(Answer) (complex table)
Q2(Question)
A2(Answer) (complex table)
Q3(Question)
A3(Answer) (complex table)
E(Collection object)
D(seller Phase)
Q(Question)
A(Answer)
My transaction during Add
A
B
C
D(Seller phase)(complex table)
Q1(Question)
A1(Answer)(complex table)
Q2(Question)
A2(Answer)(complex table)
Q3(Question)
A3(Answer)(complex table)
E(Collection object)
D(seller Phase)
Q(Question)
A(Answer)
here is my requirement:
During Activity create/Edit upon choosing seller phase i bring questions based on update rules of q1 q2 and q3 from complex table.
Possible answers are also fetched from complex table based on selection of phase for each question. I have a update rules for answers to check the object collection(E) and determine if this phase exist or not, If exist previously selected Answers will bulled from collection for the corresponding question if not it has to empty.
All rule are working with out any problem.
Issue.
During create or edit if some one chooses phase P1 and answers for the questions and with out saving if they change phase then answers which are been selected earlier still exist.
This is happening in IPAD but not in ATE. I have checked the log for rules all the rules are returning values as expected.
So i tried the below options to test
1) with special value option in field level
2) I created a dummy field with update rule with value test. On creation i have modified the dummy field value X then changed the phase the value is not getting updated as per update rule.
Is it the real behavior of update rule? Is there any work around for this problem
Regards,
Gupta

Gupta,
So based on your comments above I have the workarounds I gave you.
1) A button that refreshes "resets" to make the screen repaint (in essence a button that just re-navigates to the same screen will make all the system reset) if you just want one screen.
2)Or the multiple screen approach. Let phase 1 be in one screen and the other questions and answers on others.
Not sure if you can just do 1 screen with multi-tiles - If this is better approach where the phase selection is on 1 tile (top tile) and the questions and answers are on a different tile (bottom tile).
The trick is to make the screen repaint. As long as you present to the customers a flawless flow you will be okay. The one that you don't want to happen is when your rules are buggy then it may be just a good idea to sell a more controlled flow that works than debugging what went down the wrong during UAT (User Acceptance Test).
Regards,
Mark

Issue while Updating a table having Unique Secondary Index

Hi,
I am trying to update a 'Z' table in which there are 5 fields comprising of primary key. Out of them 2 key fields are defined as a part of seconadry index with 'Unique' option selected.
As per the requirement, I am trying to update the table using modify statement so whenever this statement occurs it will check the primary keys and accordingly try to m

958572 wrote:
Hi,
We have observed the exception *'JDBC activity timed out while updating the table -Table1"* in our logs in prod environment.
1)we verified the AWR report for that particular time and observed that one update statement was trying to update the table table1.
its a simple update statement as below
UPADTE TABLE1 SET COL1=VAL1,COL2=VAL2 WHERE ID1=VAL1 AND ID2=VAL2;
there is a PK index on ID2 column.
2)we also came to know that there were no locks on TABLE1 during this time.
can some one please let me know what could be the possible reason for this kind of exception?
ThanksOS/Networking mis-configuration.
Oracle does not know or care about the type or flavor of remote client (JDBC, OCI, ODBC, etc).
Oracle's default configuration contains no timeout.
I suspect a FireWall setting.

Problem with update a table

Hi,
--I need to update a table with only year 2010 data, it looks like this:
update abc_tab set dept_cd = replace(dept_cd, 'HRE','HW')
where dept_cd in (select dept_cd from edu_tab e, edu_lkp l
where l.dept_rnd_cd =e.dept_rnd_cd
and l.fy_cd ='2010');
--when I run above query, it updated all the data in the column , not just 2010 data, but if I do following
(select dept_cd from edu_tab e, edu_lkp l
where l.dept_rnd_cd =e.dept_rnd_cd
and l.fy_cd ='2010');
-- I got only 2010 data, so what did I do wrong on the update statement?
Thanks a lot.
Wendy

data is not correlated based on DEPT_CD,
try this:
update abc_tab abc set abc.dept_cd = replace(abc.dept_cd, 'HRE','HW')
where abc.dept_cd in (select e.dept_cd
                      from   edu_tab e
                            ,edu_lkp l
                      where l.dept_rnd_cd = e.dept_rnd_cd
                      and    e.dept_cd     = abc.dept_cd
                      and    l.fy_cd       = '2010'
commit
/

Issue with updating Security Info on my Microsoft ID

I am stuck in a vicious circle trying to sort an issue with my Microsoft account.
I need to remove an old, defunct, email address and add a load of new security info however, depending on whether the date format on the page I keep being directed to is UK or US, either the updates haven’t happened or they won’t
be happening until next month – which seems ridiculous!
I’m trying to sign up for a Windows Store developer account to publish a Windows 8 app. I’m using my MSDN subscription to register for this (for free) but there is a step I can’t get past because it insists on sending a code to
my old email address – to which I have no access. It is picking up this address from my Microsoft Account Security info – however, I updated this info weeks ago. This is the screen I see (I’ve blurred out some of it as it seemed foolish to publish all my security
info J
It says my old address will be removed on 03/04/2013 and my new info added on that same date. Does anyone know if this is UK date format 3rd April – in which case it’s a long wait or a US date 4th
March in which case it didn’t happen? I’ve tried phoning 5000 and the Microsoft Customer support lines but neither of them have a clue where to start. They just keep asking me if I’ve forgotten my password – which I haven’t.
Does anyone know how I can resolve this? My only option at the moment is to wait until 3rd of April and see if anything changes – which is not ideal.
Cheers,
Rob

Hello,
The Microsoft account forum has been retired and all account related questions must now be asked online
here.
Select the issue you need help with and fill out the requested details on the next page.
You need to be signed in with a Microsoft account to access the form. If you are unable to access your primary account, you can use an alternate account (if you have one) or create a new one at
https://signup.live.com
You can read further information about blocked accounts
here.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book:
Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C406F75746C6F6F6B2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator

Hi All VC Expert,
We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
Hot Package
- SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
- SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
We are using material variant
We are on the first level of configuration
Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
$self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
Here is the result we have:
At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.

Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?

Issue with Update of Table VARINUM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for