Issues in Heuristic Run

Hi Friends,
I am having a small problem during the Heuristic Run.
System is showing error when I try to take a Heuristic Run for a period (say May) if there are some planning results lying in the system for that product in other period (say April).
Is there any specific setting required so that when I run Heuristic for the month May, system will give result for May althogh there is planning results lying for April.
Guidence solicited.
Thanks & Regards
Kumar

Hi All,
Thanks for this prompt response.
I am talking about SNP Heuristic. I am giving an example to understand the matter :
1. Say I have a product X for which I manually enter a Forecast quantity of 100 in the month of April. Then I run a locational Heuristic. The product is Inhouse manufactured. So system generates a Production Planned Figure of 100 in April.
2. Now I put a forecast qty. of 150 in the month of May for the same material. Then I run locational Heuristic. Now I am finding that system is giving error and not generating any Production Plan.
But if I delete the Planned order of April and again run Heuristic, system generates Planned order for both April & May.
So, the problem is, when there is already an order existing in the system, system does not generate orders for other periods.
Hope this is now clear.
Looking forward to your suuport.
Thanks - Kumar

Similar Messages

Error in Heuristic run SNP

Hello,
In SNP after executing Heuristic run it gives me error message "Invalid product-location combination (peagging Area)".
(/n/SAPAPO/SNP94)
can any body help me to reslove this issue.
Thanks,
Nikhil

Hi Senthil,
I have created pagging area for location product( planning version 000 /n/SAPAPO/RRP_NETCH ).
but i am not able to assign location product to planning version 000.
It is already assign to Model 000 active model.
I am getting error message "No simulation parameters could be set for the active version".
i am getting error message in Heuristic run because of location product is not assign to active version 000?
Thanks,
Nikhil

Issues with payment run

Hi All,
I am facing with a issue with payment run FPY1. Some of the customers are refunded the amount which is not supposed to be refunded to them. When i check the Contract account level and document level, at both level there is no outgoing payment method set. Is there any other way by which payment run would pick up the amount and refund it back to custmer.
Kindly share your thoughts.
Regards,
Rahul

Do you have a third level of master data? In certain FI-CA systems there is a lower level of master data (i.e. contract, insurance object). A payment method can also be set at this level.

Heuristic run @ destination location is creating the purchase requisition without source plant

Hello All,
Trust you are doing well.
Believe this is the good time to connect with you all get some advice on the below mentioned scenario:
Material (XXXXXX) is discontinued at source location (Plant specific material status: 90) but the same material
(XXXXXX) is still used in destination location (plant specific material status: 60). Here heuristic run @ destination location is creating the purchase requisition without source plant.
Here the customer expectation is that “SNP should not create the order, since the material is discontinued in source plant”
Could you please advise?
Regards,
Prabin

Hi Prabin,
You can change the SNP profile to NO PLANNING automatically and exclude the target location from the SNP run. Maybe you can try using Badi: SMOD_APOCF005.
This is what I would do:
1- Do not exclude the status 90 in the iModel.
2- Then when you change the status in order to discontinue a material at the source location you will be changing the status from 60 to 90 and you will CIF this modification to APO. At this time, I would use the BAdI: SMOD_APOCF005 to identify this situation. You will need to add a code in order to identify what are the possible target plants of your source plant and you will need to change the SNP Profile at the target location.. look for a BAPI for this...
Take a look of this document to see an example code of SMOD_APOCF005:
APO SNP - Master Data Automation
Kind Regards,
Mariano

HT1199 Hi. I've got an issue with Pages running on Mavericks on Macbook air. Every time I open the app it hangs right there and I can't do anything on it. I've uninstall and install it back again but the issue still persists. Any help please?

HI. I've got an issue with Pages running on Mavericks. Everytime I open it up it just hangs right there and I can't do anything with it. I've deleted the app and installed it back again but the problem sitll persists. Any help please?

Thank you so much for helping,
But i really wonder how you did that. did you always switch between design view and preview view, then change the key position for 2px then switch back, to align the four letters? because i imagine that can get really frustrating, if you have a logo consisting of 58 parts instead of 4!:)
Anyway thank you very much for your time and effort!!!!

Heuristic Run - Fail

Dear All,
Working on SCM 5.0
Whenever i change/load the T- Lanes , next Day the first Heuristic Run Fails.
After Changing the T-Lane , i do the following,
1. Consistency Check - Planning Areas.
2. Consistency check - Live Cache
3. Low level Code.
Then also i am facing the same problem?
Why ? and how can i resolve the same..
Regards,
Rajesh Patil

Ya ..when u change T-lane/Load new T-Lane first Heuristic Run fails ...and in application log of Heuristic Run ... for some product- locations the source location isnot showing?
But when i rerun(2nd time) the same Heuristic it is working fine?.
As i am taking Daily Run..
plz guide me when i Change the T-lane ...Except the above consistency check is there any thing to do?
So the Heuristic will run smoothly.
Regards,
Rajesh Patil

Will I have a issues with ITunes running on a single PC?

Will I have a issues with ITunes running on a single PC? I have an IPad 1 and will be receiving an IPad Mini next week. Th iOS is different and apps will use different versions.

How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1495
 Cheers, Tom

Supply shortage, after heuristic run

hi guru s,
i run heuristic (for loc. product). then i c planning book, i c that for every product heuristic has planned, except one loc-product combination (say product A loc B). analysis .... i found that for that product (A), no planning object found(err msg). then i run consistency check, again run heuristic, and faced the same problem, e.g, no planning for 'A', showing supply shortage in the planning book at loc 'B', but demand was their.and this time no err msg.
there are valid transportation lane for tht (A) product . procurement type at source loc is 'E' , at desti loc. "F (loc B).
any help will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Satyajit

Harish,
Thank you for your answer. No i didnt create planned order in rrp3, coz, i dont have setting for ppds, so i m not so confident to create planned order in rrp3 (actually i dont have much idea on apo), thinking that it might change the requirment. we r very near to go-live and on final testing.
no the all other products dont have PPMs in the model, but some of the products have PPMs.
And one thing what is special procurement type?.. I hve planned order setting -'apo order type' 31 (that is 'in-house production' ) for heuristic run (to genarate Planned order), in the destination loc. (plant). 'Model consys check' completed before.
Satyajit

Issue regarding consecutive run for an Interface

hi all,
i have an issue regarding an interface
if this Interface is a initial run for the file, you have to populate all the data of the people. That is , unlike other interfaces where we send only the latest record, in this interface we need to send all the records of the employees. in a employee has 10 records with different dates, we will pick up all the records greater than 1999 and pass it. whereas if there is a change in one field, then we will send all the record of that file. And If it is a consecutive run then you have to populate changes only. the following algorithm can help you in this
if intial_run EQ 'X'
transfer IT_FINALDATA to XI.
else
Declare a 2 more internal tables similar to IT_FINALDATA...for our below example let us assume that
         DATA: IT_CLUSTERDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
         DATA: IT_COMPAREDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
use the following statement to retrieve the data from cluster and comparing it
        IMPORT IT_CLUSTERDATA TO IT_COMPAREDATA FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8085'.
        Compare IT_COMPAREDATA with IT_FINALDATA
If sy-subrc = 0.
Means there are no changes, and no output required
Else
Pass the data to XI interface, And store the internal table in the same INDX table, using the following statement
EXPORT IT_FINALDATA to IT_CLUSTERDATA FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8077'.
Endif.
In this can we deliver the changed data at every single consecutive run.
Please let me know,
Thank Q
Rohini.

This is something where HR Interface Toolbox (PU12) can be very helpful, it will take care of changes from one run to another and you can configure it to send changes only in next run. But, you will need some ABAP in its user exits to restrict the data after 1999, and any other restrictions that you might want.

Hard drive issues...running out of ideas...opinions?

Hello everyone!
Let me start by saying that I love all of my Apple products. I've been able to use an iPod mini, another iPod, an iPhone, a Powerbook G4 and a MacBook with no daily or otherwise recurring issue; however, the reason I now have a MacBook is because the Powerbook G4's hard drive died. Sad, but after 3 1/2 years of problem-free use in college...I could justify the upgrade.
I purchased the MacBook from my university at a nice discount back in March of this year (this was right after the newest batch was released). I was comforted by the fact that I'd more than likely have another 3-4 years before a replacement would be needed. Now, I'm not so sure...
One day last week, a tab that was opened in Safari froze up, and a song playing in iTunes began to hang. I attempted a force quit of both, but with no luck. Eventually I had no other option but to shut the computer down. Afterwards, I began getting the infamous flashing question mark upon booting back up. I realized that I'd probably had some damaged files as a result of the forced shut down, so I began working with Disk Utility/First Aid to correct the problem. Luckily, I had no important files or programs to worry about, so I went for the Erase option and hoped I could just re-install the OS.
Unfortunately it was not that easy. Now my hard drive is not showing up as Verified under the S.M.A.R.T. status, and the volume "disk1s2" will not mount. I tried everything I could find on these boards, still with no luck. So, I went for Disk Warrior today and crossed my fingers. When the menu finally loaded, there were 2 options in the drop down menu: the disk warrior cd, and an Unknown Drive. When I chose the latter, this is what I was met with:
Directory cannot be rebuilt due to disk hardware failure (-36,2268).
I'm almost convinced that I need a new hard drive. However, when I run the Apple Hardware Test, everything checks out fine. I ran it twice. Also, when I run a test on the hardware in Disk Warrior, I get this message:
This hard drive's built-in SMART diagnostics indicate the drive is functioning normally.
Now, with my old Powerbook G4, the hard drive doesn't even show up in Disk Utility. That I can understand. It needs to be replaced. But with this MacBook, all the tests indicate the hard drive is fine. The only blatent message about hardware failure I get is when I try rebuilding the directory with Disk Warrior. I know I'm probably just in denial, but when my computer is only 5 months old...I think I have the right.
So, what is your opinion? New hard drive for the 5 month old MacBook (grrr)? Or is there still hope left?

SMART diagnostics are by no means all-encompassing, so it's quite possible for a drive to pass SMART diagnostics but still be defective. My advice at this point would be to boot from the Installer, go to Disk Utility, and see if you can erase, or if that doesn't work re-partition (normally you'll choose to create a single partition) the drive. A badly corrupted disk catalog might not be reparable, but reformatting may work.
If that also fails, then the probability of the drive being defective is quite high and replacing it will probably be necessary. The tiny drives used in laptops are by nature of their very small components more prone to failure than are other drives, though as capacity and performance rise, even desktop drives are becoming more prone to breaking.
Hope this helps.

Hard drive issues; how to run hardware test

A couple of weeks ago my hard drive experienced what I would call "minor crashes". The computer booted up to the grey box with the question mark, and would do nothing more. The hard drive also made unpleasant noises. I think I got it back by resetting PRAM, but it happened a second time, and then a PRAM reset again got it back. Needless to say, I'm nervous about this drive.
I have Apple Care until January '09 (this is an '06 Intel machine) and figure I should try to move on figuring out what's up ASAP (both because I don't want a drive failure, and because I only have a few more months of Care).
I'm guessing that I should run the extended hardware test, but I can't seem to get it going using the Leopard disk I used to upgrade the OS. Do I need the original install disks (which I can't find, of course!)? What else can I do to determine if I have an issue that calls for hard drive replacement? If I need a new hard drive (it now seems small at 250gb anyhow), will I be able to do it myself (assuming Apple Care won't take care of it)?
Any insights welcome. Thanks!

Give it a try, if not you'll need to dig up your Disk 1!
+Some Intel-based Macs ship with Apple Hardware Test and Mac OS X 10.4.x preinstalled on the hard drive. If an Erase and Install installation of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard is performed using a retail Leopard installation disc, Apple Hardware Test will be erased and not reinstalled on these Macs.+
+If you're in this situation and need to use Apple Hardware Test, simply start from the DVD that came with your computer (not the Leopard installation disc) while holding the "D" key. Apple Hardware Test will run from the DVD.+
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306568

AppLocker service issue: AppIDSvc not running, but enforcement working.

I have a strange problem with AppLocker. I configured the service (AppIDSvc) and some policies using group policy and deployed it to some computers in my domain. I logged onto one of the systems and verified that AppIDSvc was running, and that
enforcement and logging were working correctly.
Later, I decided to expand that policy to more computers. I reorganized the policies somewhat, but the RSOP is the same. I logged onto one of the new machines that I applied the policy to, and noticed that the service was not running and nothing
audited in the AppLocker logs. When I try to start the service, I get "System error 31 has occurred. A device attached to the system is not functioning."
This is strange, but what is more strange is that on the first set of systems I deployed AppLocker to, I am seeing the same behavior from the service: not starting, and attempts to start result in the same error. However, AppLocker is still working!
It is still enforcing the original policies I created, and is still logging events.
I did a little more investigation, and I see that the AppID service (which AppIDSvc depends on) is running, and must be the service doing the heavy lifting behind the scenes. When I prevent the AppID service from starting (by removing it from [HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services]),
and restart the system; the enforcement/logging stops. When I put it back, it restarts. But, I cannot get it to start on systems other than the original test group, and obviously something is wrong that the AppIDSvc won't start.
It's as if the enforcement mechanism (provided by AppId.sys?) cannot be called by the AppIDSvc, or AppIDSvc cannot access the resources in use by AppID; or something to that effect. I have tried auditing the behavior of the system using procmon, but
haven't made much headway yet.
Any insight into this issue, or how to better troubleshoot it would be greatly appreciated.

Despite hours of troubleshooting, just minutes after resorting to posting about this problem I solved it!
The issue ended up being that when I updated my group policy to ensure that the AppIDSvc was enabled, in my due diligence to ensure that everything was set correctly, I selected the radio button for "Log on as: Local System account." In fact, this
service must run under the "NT Authority\Local Service" account, not the Local System account. Once the account settings were corrected, the service started no problem.
I have updated my group policy to fix the issue and all seems to be well.

MRP issue after MRP run

Hello Everyone,
We have a issue in the MRP process. When we run MRP it creates PR for additional quantity then needed not considering the Purhcase Order that exisits already. Below example will explain you in detail.
Product A Plant ABC
Stock 4
Product A safety stock = 8
Purchase Order creatred = 3
So when MRP run it should create another Purchase requistion for Quantity 1 (4-8+3 =1). But it is creating a Purhcase Requistion for Qty 4 which means it is not looking into the Purhcase Order Qty 3 that is coming in. There is no minimum lot size or any rounding rule.
Please can you tell me if there is a settings/config where we allow/not allow the Purchase Order to be considered during MRP run. I think it should be a plant specific config as for our other plant I dont see this happening.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
SAP Fan

hi,
Few checks:
1. Check rescheduling horizon...
2. check the plannning key set while running the MRP....is it NETCH...try with NETPL or NEUPL if doing for first time...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Asset Reversal AB08 and Issue in Dep run

Hi folks,
I have done an inter company asset transfer Using ABT1N -Asset got successfully transferred and after posting 2 depreciations runs, i have cancelled the asset transfer via AB08. The asset posted values tab is showing me a reversal of previous depreciations in the 3rd month but the depreciation run is throwing me an error for the same asset.
The error is as follows.
113 User is not authorised to post to company in nominal Message no. Z1144
(But I have the full authorization no issues found in su53)
Can someone please help..!
Regards,
KB

Hi,
Message is not a Standared one,
Please Check with ABAPer, There is any validations exist
Regards
Viswa

Issue with user running Outlook on Windows XP

We are having an issue with many of our users who have had their sent items disappear from Outlook. We are running Exchange 2010 SP2 with Rollup 8. All users on Windows 7 appear to be working fine, it is just users on XP that are having the issue. All
PCs are SP3 with updates applied. The messages were there previously, but the Sent folder shows empty as of Monday. They show correctly in OWA, it is just in Outlook itself that is the problem. If we enable cached mode the items populate, but our standard
policy is to run online with no local PST. We have tried running Outlook with /clearviews and in Safe Mode, but this does not resolve the issue.

Hi
Cached mode will use an OST file not a PST file.
If you remove the contents from the folder and add a new profile does it work? Are you planning on upgrade to SP3 on exchange 2010?

Issues in Heuristic Run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for