Issues in Posting_interface_clearing

Hi All,
I am posting a Customer invoice using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST and then I am clearing the same by calling the FM, Posting_interface_clearing.
In some cases, the Clearing fails with the message that 'Difference is too large for clearing'.
However if I reprocess the same file, it goes through successfully.
This issue occurs intermittently mostly during the first run of the Interface program.
Can anybody tell me the probable cause of this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Binu

Hello Binu,
Please have a look at below link :
[POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING|POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING;
Regards,
Sujeet

Similar Messages

Issue with indirect Quotation Exchange rates...

Hi All,
I am using FM 'POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING' to clear the customer open items.
While posting with indirect quotation exchange rates i.e BKPF-KURSF is in negative.It is throwing below error
"The Exchange rate may not be transferred if negative".
When i check it in BKPF table the value is saved like exp: '/1.9010'. for select query it is picking like '1.9010-'
How to resolve this issue.? it is very urgent.
Thanks in Adv.
Regards,
Raj.

Hi,
I gave the OB08 entries, not sure if you wanted me to explain the logic. Here it is..
Maintain 'Indirect quotation' from Local currency(USD) to Transaction currency(CAD) and 'Direct quotation' from Transaction currency(CAD) to Local currency(USD).
Direct quotation is where the cost of one unit of foreign currency is given in units of local currency, whereas indirect quotation is where the cost of one unit of local currency is given in units of foreign currency.
Your local currency is USD:
- Direct exchange rate: 1CAD = 0.92819 USD
- Indirect exchange rate: 1USD = 1.08238 CAD
The following settings have been made in the standard system:
- Direct quotation: ' '
-   Indirect quotation: ' / '
Direct exchange rates do not have a prefix.
Your local currency is USD. You enter a business transaction in the transaction currency CAD. Until now, you had to use direct quotation to enter the exchange rate (1CAD =0.92819 USD). If you have defined '/' as the prefix for indirect quotation, you can also enter the exchange rate with indirect quotation (1 USD = 1.08238 CAD) by entering '/1.08238' in the exchange rate field.
Direct or indirect quotation can be maintained as the standard form of quotation for a certain currency pair. You use:
         - '1' for direct quotation
         - '2' for indirect quotation
If a standard form of quotation has not been specified for a currency pair, the system automatically uses direct quotation.
You make the settings in the IMG: General Settings -- Currencies -- Set Standard for Direct/Indirect Quotation per Currency Pair.
Thanks
Ganesh

Problem with clearing FM - POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING

Hello,
We are using the above FM for clearing customer open items against the incoming payments.
This is working fine for some cases.
However for large volume ransactions, this does not work - When executed in background the program gives error "BDC_OPEN_GROUP, group .. is invalid".
Currently we are tyring to clear around 220000 open items against 1 payment document.
This function module works fine for all scenarios, however does not work only for for large volume transactions.
SAP does not provide any assistance for this issue as the function module is 'not released'
Given below is the code that we are using to call the function module:
CALL FUNCTION 'POSTING_INTERFACE_START'
    EXPORTING
      i_function         = 'C'
      i_group            = l_group
      i_mode             = 'N'
      i_update           = 'S'
      i_user             = sy-uname
      i_xbdcc            = 'X'
    EXCEPTIONS
      client_incorrect   = 1
      function_invalid   = 2
      group_name_missing = 3
      mode_invalid       = 4
      update_invalid     = 5
      OTHERS             = 6.
Clear all the line items.
CALL FUNCTION 'POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING'
    EXPORTING
      i_auglv                    = c_auglv     "value = UMBUCHNG
      i_tcode                    = c_tcode    "value = FB05
    TABLES
      t_blntab                   = t_blntab
      t_ftclear                  = t_ftclear
      t_ftpost                   = t_ftpost
      t_fttax                    = t_fttax
    EXCEPTIONS
      clearing_procedure_invalid = 1
      clearing_procedure_missing = 2
      table_t041a_empty          = 3
      transaction_code_invalid   = 4
      amount_format_error        = 5
      too_many_line_items        = 6
      company_code_invalid       = 7
      screen_not_found           = 8
      no_authorization           = 9
      OTHERS                     = 10.
IF t_blntab[] IS INITIAL.    " sy-subrc <> 0.
    w_flag = 'X'.
    w_indicator = 'U'.
ELSE.
    CLEAR w_flag.
    w_indicator = 'A'.
    COMMIT WORK.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION 'POSTING_INTERFACE_END'.
Any pointers regarding the solution for this problem will be of great help.
Thanks,
Sushil Joshi

Hello Sujeet,
As I mentioned, we are using FM POSTING_INTERFACE_START, then POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING and POSTING_INTERFACE_CLOSE.
We have successfully tested this FMs for clearing documents over 50000 at a time, without splitting into sets of 999. Its only for this particular case that it is failing.
We have 1 payment document and rest others (over 200000) open items. So my question is - if we have to split for every 999 items, do we need to call the POSTING_INTERFACE_START, then call the FM POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING in a loop and at the end call POSTING_INTERFACE_CLOSE.
Will this post a single clearing document or a separate payment document for every set of 999 items ?
Please advise.
Thanks.

DME error : POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING

Dear Gurus.
I could run payment on F110 properly.
But when I create DME file, error displayed that
"Internal error when calling POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING"
DME program is RFFOJP_T.
Do you have any idea how to solve?
BR
Y.Kaneko

Hi Yoshitada / Narasimham,
Please check below information which might help you on resolving this error:
SAP Note 304698
Check if the tables T042E, T012D are maintained in your system.
Go to T-cd:SU52 and check there is 'BUK'(parameter ID) or not.
If there is BUK, enter the Parameter value for BUK with CAPITAL letters.
Enter program 'RFFOJP_T' and push Execute button at t-cd:SE38.
On next screen, fill in 'Run date' and 'Identification feature' and set 'A:Display all screens' to field 'Posting session'.
Then, execute RFFOJP_T. You can process the transaction by push ENTER key, and check if any error messages are displayed.
This issue might occur if you run the program in any other language other than 'JA'. This is because the program uses some Japanese characters that are required in the ASCII file.
If you run the program in language JA this issue should not occur.
Also a missing customizing for posting of bank charge with program RRFOJP_T. Please complete your posting key customizing settings via FBZP for corresponding House bank T-cd: FBZP-> Edit-> Company code -> Bank charges (Japan)-> account determination
Here you have to set the Bank subacct's postkey and the Bank charge acc's postkey as the same as 50. Then you can run the print program without error.
If the transaction that you are using is selecting the information from the customer with withholding tax to determine the tax amount automatically please read the following information:
Clearing transactions like, for example F-44, F-32, FB05 'Transfer posting with clearing' are generally not relevant to withholding tax. Thus documents which were posted using clearing transactions do not contain any withholding tax information.There is also no withholding tax information transferred into the cleared documents.
Transactions relevant to withholding tax are FB01, FB60, FB70 or payment payment transactions like FBZ2, F110, FB05 (incoming payment and outgoing payment).Then in the clearing document withholding tax items are generated.
Only with the option 'Transfer posting with clearing' the withholding tax will not be calculated in FB05 transaction. In relation with the withholding tax calculation the system works as design.
Kind Regards,
Leo

New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York. I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
1. I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention. Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording. I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows. I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR. Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
2. I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes. One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day. My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new". Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR. Any fixes?
Thanks for the help.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I came from RCN about a year ago. Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable. Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
Some general principles.
Saving changes. When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes. Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options. Look at the Series Options window. Look at the far right side. There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes. Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
Default Series Options. This is accessed from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options. This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options. You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create. Be sure to SAVE your changes. This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide. When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead. Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
Non-series recordings. With Fios you have no directly available options for these. With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series. With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later; change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
And now, to the unwanted repeats.
First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only". If not, fix that and SAVE. Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New". It happens. Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time". To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide. Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored.
Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New". These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel". Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes". However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.
As for you missing two minutes, I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time. To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time. You might have an older software version. Newest is v.1.8. Look at Menu--Settings--System Info. Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes. I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording. There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them. With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

Dear All,
As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
Please suggest.
Ashwani

Dear Jayanti,
We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
/111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
With Regards
Ashwani

Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

Hello Friends
I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
(Delivery completed).
We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
following:
DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM      DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
650000001       10     UB        X
650000001       20     UB        X
650000001       30     UB
650000001       40     UB
When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
system.
Any help is appreciated in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
sampath

Hi Priya and Reddy
   Thanks for your response.
                     Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                    I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                   In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
    41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---
    42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
    43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
    44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
(Here --- means blank)
Thanks and Regards
sampath

HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue

Hello,
I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
Regards,
Anatoly

I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
Click on New Post.
I hope this helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue

Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
Physical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3073 MHz
Built-in memory: 12279 MB
Free memory: 9577 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
Image tile size: 128K
First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
Any help will be gratefully accepted.
Doug

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
doug87510 wrote:
The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key. When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair. That's a feature, not a bug.
Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out. I will download them and try them now myself.
Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing... QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe. Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
-Noel

Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0

Hello,
I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
The issues i am facing --
1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are - Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
--Regards
Dedeepya

Hi Anu,
i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
You can preset your break-points at :-
1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
Regards
Dedeepya C

Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10

Hi all,
This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
When i entered into Log-
1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
My segemnt is as follows-
ZMATMAS05                      matmas05
       E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)
           Z1KLART                        KLART----
My extention
           E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
           E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT)
           E1MARCM                        Master material C segment (MARC)
               Z1AUSPM                        E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
My extention
               E1MARC1                        Additional Fields for E1MARCM
               E1MARDM                        Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
               E1MFHMM                        Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
               E1MPGDM                        Master material product group
               E1MPOPM                        Master material forecast parameter
               E1MPRWM                        Master material forecast value
               E1MVEGM                        Master material total consumption
               E1MVEUM                        Master material unplanned consumption
               E1MKALM                        Master material production version
           E1MARMM                        Master material units of measure (MARM)
           E1MBEWM                        Master material material valuation (MBEW)
           E1MLGNM                        Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
           E1MVKEM                        Master material sales data (MVKE)
           E1MLANM                        Master material tax classification (MLAN)
           E1MTXHM                        Master material long text header
           E1CUCFG                        CU: Configuration data
       E1UPSLINK                      Reference from Object to Superior UPS
Thanks.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PM

CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ?

Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA

Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Thanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi

Issue of Free Goods

Dear All
I have some is my current assignment-Customer is buying some material say "A" want "B,C" as exclusive free goods
is it possible to give two free at a time in same order ?
I only know one exlusive free good can be give to one material with combination of customer ( Customer/Material)
Looking for some inputs regarding the issue.
Can you plz suggest me if there is any possiblities for BOM?
Many Thanks
Rakesh Naveen

Dear Rakesh,
Be informed that free goods is not currently supported in combination with material structures (e.g. product selection,
bills of material, variants with BOM explosion), see note 796926.
Determination of free goods is performed in include FV45PF0N_NATRAB_SELECTION and the check is hardcoded. You will have to modify the program to get that functionality, but be carfull that any modification won't be supported by SAP, see note 170183.
I hope it can help you.
Ruy Castro

Issue in creation of control cycle

Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshots.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the threads in Production Planning and LE/WM Forum. I could not resolve the issue with the threads.
Hope that I will get any pointer in EWM forum.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3610822
With Regards,
Malay

Hello Malay,
Can first contact your ABAPer and ensure the bottom screen is not an Screen Enhancement?
If it is a some custom development, your ABAPer can help you on the logic behind it.
Else, Let us know.
Regards,
Sathish

Issue in Creation of XML file from ABAP data

Hi,
I need to create a XML file, but am not facing some issues in creation of XML file, the in the required format.
The required format is
-<Header1 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201D>
   - <Header2 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 10 fields>
          <Header3 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
          <Header4 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 4 fields/.>
           <Header5 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
      </Header2>
   </Header1>
Iu2019m using the call transformation to convert ABAP data to XML file.
So please anybody can help how to define XML structure in transaction XSLT_TOOL.
And one more thing, here I need to put the condition to display the Header 3, Header 4, Header 5 values. If there is no record for a particular line item in header 3, 4 & 5, I donu2019t want to display full line items; this is only for Header 3, 4 & 5.
Please help me in this to get it resolved.

Hello,
you can use CALL TRANSFORMATION id, which will create a exact "print" of the ABAP data into the XML.
If you need to change the structure of XML, you can alter your ABAP structure to match the requirements.
Of course you can create your own XSLT but that is not that easy to describe and nobody will do that for you around here. If you would like to start with XSLT, you´d better start the search.
Regards Otto

Issues in Posting_interface_clearing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for