Issues in Tcode-CO06

Hi,
We are experiencing an allocation issue in CO06. Basically, when we allocate stock to different orders, some of them lose the allocated stock when we save. Especially when we allocate stock partially to an order. For example : Order is for 4 pcs but we would only like to allocate 2. When we do this and save the CO06 screen and then go back into CO06, we see that the allocation on that order is 0 versus the 2.
Please advice how this can be rectified.
Regards,
Vikas

Can you please specify the requirement in more elaborate way?

Similar Messages

Issue with Tcode Iviews

Hi Friends,
We have few tcode iviews created in our portal. Whenever we execute this iview they work fine. Whenever we try to attach any document to such iviews, system asks for user credentials. We need to remove this pop-up. Can anyone help on this?
Regards,
Shreya

Hi Arun,
The SSO has been performed between Portal and backend systems. We are facing issue only when we try to add attachment from our hard disk in tcode iviews. If we do not attach any documents, it does not ask for user credentials and everything works fine. Only when we click to attach docs, it asks us for user credentials.
Regards,
Shreya

ECATT issue in Tcode MIGO- High priority

Hi ,
We are facing an issue in eCATT for Tcode MIGO in MM.
Everything went on well earlier. All of a sudden an error occurs as"Programming error. Data already aggregated". I asked my MM guy to check with his data. he says the MIGO is fine when ran independantly as aTcode. Thi serror occurs only while running thro' eCATTs. I would request someone to respond on this ASAP as we are stating our UAT today.
Sudha

Hi Sudha,
Even I am getting exactly the same error while running the script in Ecatt for the Tcode - MIGO.
(Error : Proramming error : Data already aggregated)
How did you resolve the error? Please help me in solving this error.
Regards,
Sachin Maheshwari
9881154030

Srm issue in Tcode BBPSC04

Hi All
I have a issue in srm in Tcode BBPSC04 , in detailed history the Error is displaying as
ERROR IN PROCESS -TRANSFER FAILED , INFORM SYSTEM ADMINSTRATION
Can any body guide me to solve the issue and what is the error about
Thanks & Regards
vedagiri

Hello,
Are you seeing this error within a shopping cart?
If so, this means that cart failed to generate a follow-on document.
Please, check note 1480994, which provides more information.
Regards
Ricardo

Trying to resolve Recursive BOM Component issue in Tcode CO46

Hello,
I am trying to identify the problem component when running CO46 and getting a "Recursive BOM Component" message.
I thought I would try to catch the bad component in the debugger, but I can't seem to find where to put the Breakpoint or identify a field to put a Watchpoint on.
Has anyone else had this issue and were you able to ID the BOM Component that was causing the issue?
Thanks very much for your help.
Andy

Dear all,
I resolved the Issue myself
SPTO and MAST table table has the all the details
Regards,
Gaurav Sood

Issues with Tcode MM60

Hi,
The user is using Transaction code MM60 for extracting Material List based on Material Number and Plant.
After receiving the output data in SAP screen, the user is unable to export the same date in MS Excel by pressing CtrlShiftF7
We can download the same output to Excel onto Desktop, however unable to see the same in SAP Excel format.
We dont find any missing authorizations, however we evem tried with SAP_ALL profile still the issue remains the same.
Please advice.
Regards.

I had a similar problem with displaying data in Excel within SAP. This was resolved by making changes to settings in Excel depending on whether you are using Excel 2003 or 2007.
In Excel 2003:
use menu option Tools> Macro> Security--> there are two tabs:
Security level and Trusted partners. In the trusted partners tab make sure both checkboxes (trust access to VB content AND installed add-ins) are TICKED. This should most probably resolve the problem.
In Excel 2007:
Goto Excel Options. Select the Trust Center tab. Under Microsoft Office Excel trust Center click on the Trust Center Settings.
In the Trust Center Window select Macro Settings tab. Under that, enable Macros and tick Trust access to VBA project object model.
Hope this helps. This Solution is available on one of the SAP Notes. I can't remember which one though....
Regards,
Prashant

Reg: Issues in Tcode: MIGO

Hi,
Can anyone suggest me tht, as per client requirement, they need T.code :MIGO had to be Customised and they need range between G/L number(eg: From:50000076, To: 50000094), we can able to customize tht t.code or any other transaction code to do tht....
Can u anyone revert me back....
Thanks &Regards
Karthick
Edited by: Vasanth Karthick on Aug 23, 2010 2:13 PM

Can you please specify the requirement in more elaborate way?

Issue in Tcode -- COOIS

Hi All,
We have upgraded our system from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 , but when I am running the COOIS transaction , On selection field 'Profile' selection field is not there but in 4.6c its available.
Is there any reason behind or How can I populate Profile selection field.
thanks
bobby

There are some changes that happened to COOIS screen from SAP R/3 4.6c to ERP 6.0.
Following are some of the screen changes -
Screen Fields
4.6c - Profile u2013 Standard Profile
ERP 6.0 - Profile List Box not available
Fields for selection at Component level
ERP 6.0 - Requirement Date Missing Part Check Box
Fields in Options
ERP 6.0 - Reduced Reading Check Box, This indicator determines whether all data in an order is displayed in the output list.
Fields in Relative dates at header level
4.6c - Basic Start-Finish, Scheduled Start-Finish-Release, Actual Start-Finish-Release
ERP 6.0 - For all field labels, Relative is prefixed.
By default the profile is standard layout only.
Hope this helps you.

Post goods issue - restriction on plant - VL01N tCode

Hi All!
I have an authorization/restriction problem as regards posting goods in VL01N and VL02N.
I have more users (U1, U2...) and each user has the authorization to post goods just for one plant (U1-P1, U2-P2......) . The user U1 can create delivery for P1, P2 but he must post goods only for P1.
I created 2 type of roles: one role for all users with no restriction on plant but with restriction on movement type (no authorization for 601) and the other type role has the authorization for movement type 601 and the plant (Role1 for 601 and P1 assigned to U1, Role2 for 601 and P2 assigned to U2). And is working if the user wants to post goods from VL02N. But if the user posts goods from VL01N (before saving the delivery)......U1 can post goods for P2...
I don't know if I made clear which one is my need. If I succeed, please let me know if there is one solution. Maybe there is a way to disable the button Post goods issue for tcode VL01N.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Florina Cheta

Florina,
tried what you explained.
I created a role with just VL01N transaction and system asks for shipping point and assigns actions 01 and 06.
Later I added transaction VL02N and system doesnt add any new authorization but just adds activity 02.
Now, I do not understand what activity type you are refering by 601.
Otherwise, its very simple to restrict access as yiou mentioned. Its perfect.

Error while creating media issue in msd using jpmg0

Dear all,
kindly help me to solve the following issue. when i am creating media issue using tcode jpmg0, in the process lo,g system shows the following error message.
"Required parameters missing when calling up module " ACCOUNTING_KEYS_READ_FOR_BWKEY". It is very helpfull to me, give a reply by anybody as early as possible. kindly help me.

Hi,
Request you to check media product and media issue master data setup.
Items for which neither financial accounting nor price calculation is permitted,you might this error.
Best Regards,
Chandra

AIAB issue (asset settlement issue)

Dear Sapguru,
On dev system, we are facing an issue for tcode AIAB. In our current process we park & post document through MIR7 & MIR6 respectively. While posting the document we post to CWIP asset & later on transfer from CWIP to actual asset.
But from January 2012, CWIP asset master shows document posted but while transfering from CWIP to main asset through t code AIAB line items are not display. but in QA the same is working fine.
Kindly help us to resolving issue.
Thanks & regards,
Pramod Chavhan

Varsha,
When did you settle the Values from IO to AUC?
If this was done in 2011, just look after year closing and opening new.
If it is in 2012, go to AR01, AR02 and AR03 and check if the values are appearing for AUC
Let us know the results
Thanks

Position goods issue log.

Dear gurus,
We run the solution on ECC 6.0 SR3. when I performed goods issue using tcode 'vl06g',Goods movement error occured.
Now my problem is that the error log is so simple ,there is no material number and the item is empty.how can I position the error in so many delivery items.
In contrast to that ,error log of tcode 'vl02n' is enough easy to position the delivery item.
I think this is a bug, it's too inconvenient.
Can you help me ? maybe there is a note to fix it.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Lykin Kan

hi santhosh
kindly check the order type .i think you are using MB1A for refurbishment process.but it is not possible.only maintenance order can be posted via MB1A
follow the procedure for goods issue in refurbishment order.
Choose Logistics ® Plant maintenance ® Maintenance processing ® Completion confirmation ® Goods movement ® Goods movement.
The entry screen for a goods issue appears.
Choose the pushbutton For order.
Enter the relevant order number in the dialog box and choose Continue.
An entry screen appears.
Choose Copy.
The Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box appears.
Choose Reference document.
Enter the order number in the Refurbishment order group box and choose Execute.
A list appears with the planned serial numbers for the refurbishment order.
Check the selections of serial numbers, for whose material you want to post a goods issue, and choose Copy.
The serial numbers are copied into the Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box.
Choose Exit window.
The goods issue is posted.
regards
thyagarajan

CO06 Backorder processing

Good morning!
I have to allow access to users to the sales orders backorder processing, but I cannot provide access to modifications. I thought about the tcode CO06 (which fully suits our purposes), but once there the users can change the reservations. My question is, is there a transaction like CO06, but that allows only displaying?
Thank and best regards,
Adriano Cardoso
Edited by: Adriano Cardoso on Oct 19, 2010 12:39 PM

Yes,pls use CO09-->Its the same but u cannot modify nothing.
Thanks and best regards
L

Issue with VC/2 - not fetching the invoice details

Hi All,
We have an issue with TCode VC/2 in ECC 6. This is not fetching( not showing) the Invoice documents under the header "Last SD Documents".
It is fetching the sales documents like orders, credit memo/debit memo requests but not the invoice documents.
PLease help on this.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Harini Kesani on Jan 12, 2010 8:25 PM

Is it possible that 'last SD document' means 'last sales document', not 'last billing document'? Unfortunately, I'm unable to confirm - we don't use this transaction. You can also check what tables are used in this transaction (get help from an ABAPer or Basis) and then check if there is correct data in those tables. It might be using info structures or index tables, which may need to be populated first.

Tcode DSWP, Determining warning messages from CCMS

We use SAP Solution Manager 4.0, SPS 13 for System Monitoring of almost 100 systems.
We configured SOLMAN as CEN system and activated the CCMSPING with push option.
For almost the 2/3 of the systems we configured SAPCCM4X agents.
Our current problem is a performance issue in tcode DSWP. When we try to enter into one of the solutions there (by pressing on it) we get the following warning:
Determining warning messages from CCMS
It tooks a while and then it is possible to access the desired solution.
My important question is of course:
How can this issue be solved?
Is there some techniques to analyse and change the problem
How can I check whether all the agents work in push mode and that we do not use standard CCMS methods that can cause the RFC load?
Thank you very much for any helpful information
Regards
Thom

Hi Thom,
Have you already installed CCMS agents, the will speed up communication? That's definitely required in your situation with many systems connected to SolMan.
See [http://service.sap.com/monitoring|http://service.sap.com/monitoring]
You can also check CPU, Memory, as recommended by Afi, but I expect that this will not be the bottleneck.
Response times depend on the number of connect systems, number of activated monitoring objects (MTE nodes), number of server, instances.
If you are not satisfied with performance, I would recommend to open a customer message on component SV-SMG-OP or SV-SMG-MON-SYS.
Best regards,
Ruediger

Issues in Tcode-CO06

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for