Issues with payment run

Hi All,
I am facing with a issue with payment run FPY1. Some of the customers are refunded the amount which is not supposed to be refunded to them. When i check the Contract account level and document level, at both level there is no outgoing payment method set. Is there any other way by which payment run would pick up the amount and refund it back to custmer.
Kindly share your thoughts.
Regards,
Rahul

Do you have a third level of master data?  In certain FI-CA systems there is a lower level of master data (i.e. contract, insurance object).  A payment method can also be set at this level.

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Payment Run (FPY1)

    Hi Gurus, need you help. I am getting the following message when executing the FPY1. Exceptions        1 Message no. MASSACT101 Diagnosis Counter Exceptions has value        1. For a more precise description of counter Click Here. Counter in Payment Program: Items with Exception Indicator Definition Number of items that cannot be paid and that have been placed in the list of payment exceptions. Each payment exception is classified using the item indicator (data element POKEN_PAY). For each item indicator, you can define whether these exceptions are to be included in the clarification worklist of the payment run.

    Hi Aravind
    Payments which cannot be made through FPY1 are caught in the exceptions. You can view the exception list by checking on the excpetion checkbox. Each exception corresponds to an item indicator (POKEN_PAY). Check for what item indicator, you are getting an exception. The solution is based on the type of exception.
    check the screenshot below
    regards
    debashish

  • Issue with payment run

    hi guru's
    We have one vendor in two company code one is India and one is USA. The bank account number  is different in vendor master data but both accounts in the same country.
    When we make the payment run it has to split to different account based on the currency say for example in this case INR and USD.
    What we are doing at the moment  is whenever we want to make payment to say for example bank account 123456789 we will delete one bank in master data that is 987654321  and make payment. Whenever we want to make payment to 987654321 we will delete 123456789 bank in the master data and make payment.
    Is there any alternative way to split payment according to two bank or 3 banks based on the vendor master data?
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    I don't know a way to split, but to make separate payments you do not need to change the vendor master all the time.  In the vendor master, assign a unique value in the field BnkT for each bank account that you have in the vendor master; this 4-character value is free text (you can enter anything you want as long as you can distinguish).  You then enter this key while entering vendor invoice in SAP (either via FB60 or MIRO).  You will see the field as "Part. Bank" in Payment tab of FB60/MIRO.  The payment program then pays the item via that bank in the vendor master to which this key is assigned.

  • Error FZ-358 - Overlap with payment run

    Hello.
    We have a client SAP 40B that experienced an issue while running a new payment run throught T-code F110.
    The payment was:
    Run Date: 12.30.2008
    Identification: F0719
    The user got the following message:
    "FZ 358 - Overlap with payment run 02.03.2008 / Identification F0719"
    "Payment run canceled"
    Anybody have an idea why this happened as the payments ran in different dates?
    Thank you!

    Hello MSJ.
    This issue happens probably because there was another payment ID with the same name that ran incompletely in the past. Somehow the system identifies this payment ID and then try to use the same one when you run another payment with the same ID so this message comes up. The solution is really delete the old uncompleted payment run and then run the payment again.
    Regards,
    Volnei Luiz

  • Overlap with payment run 25.02.2008

    Hello friends,
      While running APP at F110, i got the error as "overlap with payment run 25.02.2008 HMY1(Co. code)" The description is given below:
    Diagnosis
    Accounts to be processed in this run have already been processed in payment run or proposal run 25.02.2008 HMY1.
    System Response
    The run is terminated to avoid double payments.
    Procedure
    Either narrow down the accounts to be processed or wait until the payments for the 25.02.2008 HMY1 have been carried out.
    I have deleted the payment proposal and parameters entered and again run the programme. Again i am getting the same error. Could anyone let me know how to solve this error.
    Regards
    Sabera

    Hi Sabera,
    Please check the following in your system :
    1. If there is a blocked entry in the table T042X. If yes, this should be the reason why you get error FZ358 when runing any proposal in your Company Code. In such case, you may have to delete the entry in tha table T042X.
    2. If in table REGUV, there is a value 'S' in field XECHT for this payment run, which is incorrect. The value here should be a space.
    It is dificult to know the exact reason for this error. I guess this would have caused by some improper actions for F110 proposal deletion. In order to get this corrected you should carry out a correction in
    tables T042X and set REGUV in your system. I would suggest you to do that first in your test system.
    Hope this information helps you.
    Thank you.
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Overlap with payment run in SAPF110S

    Scheduled F110S in background job, but the job is throwing the following error :
    "Log for payment run for payment on 29.07.2008, identification ABC
    Overlap with payment run 27.06.2008 64GT1
    ... the execution of the payment program is terminated"
    Please advise/suggest what could have gone wrong  and if possible please suggest the solution?

    Hi,
    There is already a payment run was half way through... with the same selection parameters... 
    Use T Code F110,
    run date 27.06.2008
    ID -64GT1
    Now delete the proposal...
    Try now F110S...
    Hope it helps
    Regards
    A.Saravanan.

  • HT1199 Hi. I've got an issue with Pages running on Mavericks on Macbook air. Every time I open the app it hangs right there and I can't do anything on it. I've uninstall and install it back again but the issue still persists. Any help please?

    HI. I've got an issue with Pages running on Mavericks. Everytime I open it up it just hangs right there and I can't do anything with it. I've deleted the app and installed it back again but the problem sitll persists. Any help please?

    Thank you so much for helping,
    But i really wonder how you did that. did you always switch between design view and preview view, then change the key position for 2px then switch back, to align the four letters? because i imagine that can get really frustrating, if you have a logo consisting of 58 parts instead of 4!:)
    Anyway thank you very much for your time and effort!!!!

  • Will I have a issues with ITunes running on a single PC?

    Will I have a issues with ITunes running on a single PC?  I have an IPad 1 and will be receiving an IPad Mini next week.  Th iOS is different and apps will use different versions. 

    How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1495
     Cheers, Tom

  • Issue With Payment Proposal.

    Hello Experts,
    When I am running proposal,I am facing the message " Payment Proposal Could not be carried Out".
    Could you please guide me what it means?
    Thanks,
    Bala

    In order to debug this problem follow these steps:
    1 Key note - If you have other payment runs that you have executed with the same vendors that have not been carried to completion, they must be finished or deleted. you cannot have multiple payment runs in process with the same vendor.
    1. in F110 - Click Edit > Proposal > Delete - The parameters will now be open for you to edit them
    2. On the "Additional Log" tab, make sure you have selected the checkbox " Payment method selection in all cases"
    3. Also on the additional log tab, make sure to enter the range of your vendors you wish to make payments to in the "Accounts Required" field
    4. Now Save the proposal and execute again.
    5. Once it is done running click on the "display proposal log" button. This will give you an explanation of any errors that you may run into.
    If you still cannot figure out the issue let me know
    David

  • Issue with Payment File Creation: F110

    Hi, Everyone.
    Can anyone help me regarding this issue: Payment with identification MR319 with the run date 15.11.2011 does not contain bank account and BIC in the header of the payment file?
    Please advise.
    Thank you in advance for the help.

    Hi, Everyone.
    Another update regarding this issue, in the transaction code F110, we added another program: ZSTR001S at the Printout/data medium.  But whenever we run the payment, there's no payment file being created.  How can I resolve this issue?
    Actually, the solution in order to have bank headers in the file is to add the program ZSTR001S.  Whenever we use the payment method: V, E and S, this program should be visible at the last tab.  But upon adding this at the Printout/data medium (I did this by changing the payment medium of V and S from TRAX_DOMEST to ZSTR001S).  So it became visible at the last tab, but it didn't create any payment file.  What do you think is the reason behind this?
    Thank you.

  • Dunning issue with payment block

    Hi Experts,
    I am currently having an issue with Dunning process.
    -> In SAP standard behaviour, if we have a document which has a payment block associated to it,will it be dunned ?
    My issue is that whenever I have a document which has a payment block associated to it, it is being dunned and I dont want this.
    Could you please advise me on how to proceed ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi SDNer,
    Thanks for the confirmation.
    But the thing is that I can not put a Dunning Block to it.
    The requirement is that when there is a payment block associated to a document, it should not be dunned.
    Is there any configuration that needs to be done or any Enhancement ?
    Thanks.

  • Issue with user running Outlook on Windows XP

    We are having an issue with many of our users who have had their sent items disappear from Outlook. We are running Exchange 2010 SP2 with Rollup 8. All users on Windows 7 appear to be working fine, it is just users on XP that are having the issue. All
    PCs are SP3 with updates applied. The messages were there previously, but the Sent folder shows empty as of Monday. They show correctly in OWA, it is just in Outlook itself that is the problem. If we enable cached mode the items populate, but our standard
    policy is to run online with no local PST. We have tried running Outlook with /clearviews and in Safe Mode, but this does not resolve the issue.

    Hi
    Cached mode will use an OST file not a PST file.
    If you remove the contents from the folder and add a new profile does it work? Are you planning on upgrade to SP3 on exchange 2010?

  • Lockbox Issue with payment on exact day as Cash Discount Days 1 Due Date

    Dear Gurus
    We are running into an issue in as much as when we receive a payment against our Lockbox on the exact day as the Cash Discount Days 1 due date the system posts this as an on account posting as opposed to applying the cash against the open receivable and posting the difference to the Cash Discount Account.
    E.g. Invoice 10000 Payment term 34 days 2% Net 35. I created the AR invoice today with invoice date and posting date of Oct 9, 2009 and posted the same. Received payment $ 9800 on Lockbox file today Nov 12 using the BAI2 format Lockbox file and found that the system did not even show the invoice # on the Lockbox reports but it recognized the customer based on the MICR # and posted an on account payment. It gave the error" F5 263 Difference too large for Clearing"
    The users have prior complained that this situation arises in F-28 as well where they would have to force the discount instead of the system recognizing the same if cash was being applied on the same date as the Cash discount Days 1 due date.
    Any help in this regards will be geratly appreciated and points awarded.
    Regards
    Satpal Narang

    Hi Satpal,
    Please check the net due date of the document which you are trying to do the payment. As it is critical information to calculate the cash discount.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Issue with Payment Accounting in a 'Cash with Encumbrance' setting.

    Hi Everybody,
    We are upgrading from 11i v 11.5.10.2 to Oracle R12 v 12.1.3 . We have setup Cash with Encumbrance as the subledger accounting ledger in our primary
    ledger. The AAD for payables which is the seeded one is also valid, however to our surprise and dissapointment Create Accounting program does not account any new or old payments alike after upgrade. Any one who has encountered similar problem pls. help. Error message in Create Accouting report output is Error Number 0, Error Message : The subledger journal entry does not balance in the entered currency.  Please verify the entered amounts on the journal entry lines. (This error appears because the system does not create a Cash Clearing Line,hence the JE is unbalanced; which is wrong.)
    It seams the system is behaving like Accrual, checking first if the Invoice for the payment has been accounted or not, which in our case is erroneous because we have setup Cash Basis alongwith encumbrance. please advise.
    Many thanks,
    Arv

    Please see if these docs help.
    R12 "The Subledger Journal Entry Does Not Balance In The Entered Currency" Error While Create Accounting [ID 743441.1]
    Enhancement Request- Purchasing - Accounting [ID 1281525.1]
    Issues Related To R12 Create Accounting Process - List Of Code Fixes [ID 1179643.1]
    R12 - Troubleshooting Accounting Errors [ID 1112504.1]
    R12 Multi-Fund Account Receivables Accrual: Negative Misc Receipts and Receipt Reversal Fail During Accounting: The subledger journal entry does not balance in the entered currency. [ID 762218.1]
    Awt Wrongly Accounted On Cash Basis Accounting [ID 1294376.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Issue with payment of terms

    Hi ,
    I am using Basic type ORDERS05 , Message Type ORDERS and for processing FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.
    I expect the sales orders to give the same data when the IDOC's are the same and the customer master data is the same, but we have a concern with some orders coming in via EDI for customer sold-to-party is 10000000. When we check for IDOC's 200 (sales order 600 is been created) and for idoc 205 (sales order 650 is been created). Comparing the IDOC's and the sales orders and customer ship-to's, I see no differences except that for the sales order 600, the terms of payment do not show up from the sold-to master, but in order 650, they do.
    Please help me.
    Thanks.

    In debugging found that the PIN code of the customer is different from the IDoc to the SAP ones. So we are getting this issue.

Maybe you are looking for