Issues with Seeburger FTP adapter

Can one of you with Seeburger FTP adapter experience share some information on these issues I'm facing
1. Do I need to setup resource management in Seeburger workbench. If so, do I need to configure, resource, server and reservations. Do you have more information and what parameters I need here.
2. In the Seebuger FTP adapter, I have
Module Key - exit
Parameter Name - JNDIName
Paramter Valu - deployedAdapters/SeeXIFTP/shareable/SeeXIFTP
JNDIName, should I be replacing this with some other name. I'm trying to get Seeburger FTP to work and in the messaging monitor, I see the message as passed to Module Processor but it does go anywhere from there.
Can one you throw some light on this subject...what to expect from this definition.
Thank you for all your replies,
Parimala

I'm resending this since I did not have any luck with it the first time.
We also have an oss note waiting to be responded on this subject.
When I send messages using Seebuger FTP adapter, I see the following information in the SAP message monitor -
"Message entered module processor exit bean and will be transferred to JCA adapter".
But does not get to IBM VAN mailbox. How do I trace from this point onwards.
Should I use Seeburger monitoring tool for this? If so, I don't see anything in Seeburger monitoring (used all criteria).
Please let me know if you have any information on this subject.
Thanks,
Parimala

Similar Messages

  • Production Issue with Receiver FTP Adapter

    Hi all,
    We have so many interfaces with ECC To FTP via XI, working fine.
    We had problem with one particular Interface, FTP Owner is saying that we did not received any files since last night for this interface. But that receiver channel's log is saying clearly that file has been written to folder with given name.
    Nearly 140 files needs to be received at FTP site. Suddenly they told that received all 140 files at a time with time all with stamp 11:40am
    What might be the cause for this?? has any one faced this kind of issues??
    Please share your thoughts
    Regards
    Suman

    Hi rajesh,
    Thnx for replying, there is no receiver channel on scheduled
    Receiver communication channel time stamp is showing as same as time ecc generated with idoc.
    But received at FTP is different time( more time difference)
    Checked with FTP Admin, and there is no issues or downtime with FTP at that time.
    >>use messaging system and search with message id for knowing this step time stamp.
    How to check this, please let me know the link.
    Regards

  • Seeburger FTP Adapter And SAP PI 7.1

    Hi Everyone,
    Just a few questions about Seeburger FTP adapter please. Bit of background for clarity, we are doing an implementation using Seeburger FTP and sap PI 7.1 picking up EDIFACT (Orders) and returning (DESADV, ORDERSP, INVOICES). However we are not using any BIC, using another tool for EDIFACT -> EDIFACT-XML conversion (conversion agent) and in-house mapping development using graphical mapping.
    So couple of things which I haven't been able to figure out from the standard documentation for Seeburger FTP adapter:
    1) First is the functional ACK which we are meant to send back to the VAN is that a STANDARD FUNCTIONALITY with Seeburger FTP adapter?
    2) Because we are receiving a mix bag EDIFACT interchange on the way IN, I need to split messages accordingly and pass them on to the relevant channels and mappings. By using the standard module Splitter can I achieve that?
    3) Lastly some of the standard validations which are applicable to EDIFACT are they supported within the FTP adapter automatically? e.g. Counting number of messages in one interchange etc.
    Any help in this regard will be really great.
    regards

    Now a Good news.
    If you are using Seeburger version 2.1 (which you should be as you want it for PI 7.1), then there is an Internal Classifier and Split option for FTP adapter. You just need to tick checkbox "Use built-in splitting" and you are done. Then I believe there won't be any need for considering all these problems. The earlier version of Seeburger with PI 7.0 doesn't have such option and that could be the reason you haven't received any appropriate response yet.
    Still I will reply all your questions considering that "your case is of PI 7.0". -> remember PI 7.0
    >>even with just splitter we should be able to break it up?????? or am I wrong in thinking this?
    No. You even need BIC or an equivalent custom module for achieving this.
    >>I can't visualize where to handle the overall message count in one Interchange any suggestions?
    You need to write an adapter module for this. Not sure about the code but this module has to be added before the split happens.
    >> seeburger ftp adapter it does talk about a lot of reports which are available on sender/reciever actions. e.g. delivered, despatched etc. Are these reports not essentially ACKs?
    These reports are the ones used at the receiver side for getting the ACKs from the receiver. Your requirement is at present for sender scenario.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Problems with Seeburger FTP Receiver adapter

    Hello,
    I am working on a scenario sending ORDERS05 Idocs to EDI vendors.
    For this i have configured Seeburger Receiver FTP adapter with 2 modules to convert XML-EDI format. Since this is the test, I have pointed Seeburger to local FTP server with following settings
    Hostname <Hostname of our FTP server>
    Port <Port # of our FTP server>
    Host Path/VAN partner id <some local directory of FTP server>
    Payload mode: Maindocument.
    At runtime i received following exception
    Message could not be forwarded to the JCA adapter. Reason: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: >> Description: com.seeburger.jftp.app.exception.FtpExceptionSoftProcessingError: Unexpected reply: 500 'SITE system 1': command not understood>> Details: com.seeburger.jftp.app.exception.FtpExceptionRethrowError: Error in session: {type:FTPConnectionId}{binding:82ea8d3089dc3e898ae2e608d9d8487d}{channel:a52d1aaa8dd63ff59c2f590e78586a77}{toparty:TestEDIParty} CAUSED BY: com.seeburger.jftp.app.exception.FtpExceptionOpenConnectionError: Error while connection to remote host CAUSED BY: com.seeburger.jftp.app.exception.FtpExceptionRethrowError: Error while executing command QUOTE site system 1 CAUSED BY: com.seeburger.jftp.app.exception.FtpExceptionSoftProcessingError: Unexpected reply: 500 'SITE system 1': command not understood>>SendingStatus: NOT_TRANSMITTED>>FaultCategory: COMMUNICATION_ERROR>>Retryable: true>>Fatal: true
    Few questions related to this
    1] can we use Seeburger adapter to generate EDI files on local FTP server
    2] If not Seeburger can we use normal File adapter to do the same. I tried the same by configuring BIC module in File adapter so that it would convert XML to EDI format and was hoping file to be generated on FTP server. It generated one line XML file with following text "<info>Converted message locates in a attachment</info>". Any idea how to retreive attachments in File receiver adapter (as far as i know no attachments are supported in File receiver adapter).
    Any idea how to generate EDI files with Seeburger FTP on test server?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Rajeev

    Hi Rajeev,
    > 1] can we use Seeburger adapter to generate EDI files on local FTP server
    Yes we can use.
    > Any idea how to generate EDI files with Seeburger FTP on test server?
    It is like a normal process, how to generate the EDI files in normal means without FTP. Check this link
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10b17369-9522-2c10-84a6-d75d8a8ace22
    BIC
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00b66651-eeea-2b10-e5a6-8459ec30d948
    Regards
    Ramesh

  • Issue with Receiver SOAP adapter for synchronous scenario

    Hello All,
    We are facing a strange issue with the SOAP adapter in the interface we have setup. This is the 1st time we are using SOAP adapter in our system (PI 7.11 SP7). We are making a synchronous HTTP call to the web service exposed by another system in our landscape. The payload is send with SOAP envelope and there are no credentials to be maintained in PI settings.
    The issue is that we are always getting timeout exception in PI audit logs after sending the request (3 minutes - standard timeout value, no additional config for this). But target system has confirmed that they are sending the response back. We tested from our server OS level and have received the response back in the same screen (to verify there is no firewall/port issue in between the systems). But when tried from RWB, it is always giving the timeout exception and we are not able to see any other log.
    We have tried checking in the NWA logs as well after increasing the logging level to ALL for com.sap.aii.adapter.soap. But surprisingly, we didn't get any logs at all for the outgoing SOAP call or incoming response and hence we are unable to trace the issue.
    We have setup another synchronous inbound SOAP interface (PI exposing the webservice) and it is working fine. We are also able to trace the logs in both audit log and NWA logs.
    Is there anywhere else we can check for the logs? Audit logs is showing timeout error and we are not able to see anything in NWA logs.
    Does the target system need to maintain PI credentials in the header when they send the synchronous response back?
    Are there any specific settings which should be checked to enable the sync communication? (this should not be the case since the inbound interface is working fine)
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Justin

    Hi Amit,
    Thanks for the reply.
    Yes we had tested successfully via SOAP UI as well (forgot to mention that). We are getting back the expected response in SOAP UI without using any credentials. We got the same response when we tested it through OS commands from PI server.
    The WS is hosted by the target system and they haven't maintained any credentials at their end. So when PI is trying to access, we don't need to provide any credentials. My question is, whether the target system should keep any credentials to send the synchronous response back to PI (java stack). We have tried that as well but since there aren't any logs, we are unable to verify whether the credentials are coming correctly.
    The service interfaces are correct and PI configuration are OK. I will try the XPI inspector for logs as you have suggested.
    Thanks
    Justin

  • AS2 Adapter MDN option and Seeburger FTP adapter

    Hi Experts,
    I configured the a scenario AS2 to File, it takes all the signals from customer and placed in a particular folder, later by using some other scenario it goes to the seeburger workbench and process further.
    Now I sent one outbound (810) signal to customer, then we will receive the MDN back, so we receive MDN also in the specific folder (by using the above AS2 to File configuration)? or we need to create separate CC and Sender Agreement by using the sender party?
    One more Question about Seeburger FTP adapter
    I configured the sender side FTP adapter to pick the functional acknowledgement (997), in the component monitoring it is displaying the below error
    "Cannot create reservation, reason: Resource not available for reservation!; affected object : Resource (type:LOGICAL/id:ABCFTP/name:Logical resource name for abc to access the FTP mailbox)", I have deleted the old reservation in seeburger work bench resource management, still no luck.
    Could you please guide me.
    Thanks
    Ramesh

    Hi Experts,
    I configured the a scenario AS2 to File, it takes all the signals from customer and placed in a particular folder, later by using some other scenario it goes to the seeburger workbench and process further.
    Now I sent one outbound (810) signal to customer, then we will receive the MDN back, so we receive MDN also in the specific folder (by using the above AS2 to File configuration)? or we need to create separate CC and Sender Agreement by using the sender party?
    One more Question about Seeburger FTP adapter
    I configured the sender side FTP adapter to pick the functional acknowledgement (997), in the component monitoring it is displaying the below error
    "Cannot create reservation, reason: Resource not available for reservation!; affected object : Resource (type:LOGICAL/id:ABCFTP/name:Logical resource name for abc to access the FTP mailbox)", I have deleted the old reservation in seeburger work bench resource management, still no luck.
    Could you please guide me.
    Thanks
    Ramesh

  • Issue with JMS inbound Adapter  and Asynchronous BPEL

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing the below issue with JMS inbound Adapter and Asynchronous BPEL .
    I have 2 JMS Queues one inbound and one outbound . The Composite has multiple BPEL Components around 4 on an average and i have 4 composites similar to that .
    Totally 4 Composites * 4 BPEL Components = 16 Services
    Propoesd Solution :
    I have used MessageSelector in the JMS Adapter for selecting the incoming message. The BPEL gets invoked if the message selector is true and proceses the Message and writes the response to the other Queue.
    Initially i had no problems but intermittantly the BPEL processes are getting invoked but they are not processing the data ( Bpel process is supposed to invoke an external service and get the response in a sync call) and each BPEL processe instance is in running state for ever . This remains even if i restart the servers .
    The message gets read by the JMS Adapter , BPEL instace gets created but it wont proceed futher and remains in the runnign state for ever.
    If i redeploy the Composite then messages get processed but the issue creeps up again ( i tried to checl the logs but ino cluea about the issue .
    Getting frustrated day by day tried the bpel.config.transaction, increased the JMS Adapter threads , inreased the worker threads but all in vein..
    please let me know if any one has faced similar issue .
    Anticipating a quick response from the gurus.
    Lakshmi.

    We are also facing this issue in 11.1.1.5.
    Breifly the issue is : The BPEL process which polls an inbound JMSAdater ( consume_message) either stays in running state forever ( whatever we do) or go to the recovery queue. It doesnt recover even if i try to recover it. This happens intermittently. Redeploying the application / restarting servers sometime solve the issue but as know we cant do that on prod systems .
    Can some one look into this on priority and help us giving a solution/workaround.

  • Seeburger ftp adapter issue

    Hi there,
    We have the following scenario. We want to get EDI 861 via ftp from our partner  to XI to our R3. The challenge we are facing is getting started with seeburger adapters. We looked into seeburger ftp/van adapter. We are not using VAN. Is it possible to configure this adapter in sender communication channel for our scenario? We tried it, but we are stuck at choosing the message protocol, because we get only the VAN supported message protocols from the drop down menu.
    Our goal is to get the EDI 861 from our partner via ftp, parse it to XML representation, map the xml to equvalent IDOC and send it to our R3. Is there a seeburger adapter that receives the edi and parses it into? If yes, how do we go about to solve this issue. Right now, we are not able to configure the adapter right so that we could get the edi flat file via ftp and get the parsed edi xml in xi moni.
    Your help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You need to configure the AS2_MDN_Sender Communication Channel with transport protocol is AS2 and Message protocol is Reports.
    Regards,
    Ramesh

  • Issues with Seeburger AS2 alerts

    Hello All,
    I am trying to setup an alert rule for any failures in the AS2 adapters.
    I have created an alert rule in the RWB, with the adapter type as AS2.I have created the alert category as well.
    When the AS2 message is unable to reach the destination system, the communication channel errors out with the description about the connection issue. But for some reasons, the alert rule is not called. I could see in the "SXMSALERT_LOGREADER" report that No active rule for this Adapter Framework exception. I have selected a * for all the filter criteria in the alert rule except for the adapter type (which is filtered as AS2).
    Are my basis guys missing any alert enablement functionality while deploying the AS2?
    Pls note that I am able to receive email alerts if the adapter type is selected as File or JMS instead of AS2.
    Pls help me.
    Edited by: Senthilnathan Natarajan on Oct 4, 2011 5:53 PM

    I'm resending this since I did not have any luck with it the first time.
    We also have an oss note waiting to be responded on this subject.
    When I send messages using Seebuger FTP adapter, I see the following information in the SAP message monitor -
    "Message entered module processor exit bean and will be transferred to JCA adapter".
    But does not get to IBM VAN mailbox. How do I trace from this point onwards.
    Should I use Seeburger monitoring tool for this? If so, I don't see anything in Seeburger monitoring (used all criteria).
    Please let me know if you have any information on this subject.
    Thanks,
    Parimala

  • Client Auth  and SSL with Seeburger AS2 adapter

    Hello All,
    We are using the Seeburger AS2 adapter in our landscape and I am in the process of setting the same up and have made quite some progress in all my issues.
    and I  hope that you will be able to help me out.
    1. Server SSL on Receiver AS2 adapter
    I am sending a message from XI using the Receiver AS2 adapter to my AS2 test tool using Server SSL.
    This is working perfectly fine. In my AS2 adapter I have selected HTTPS as the protocol and the message goes via SSL to the target test tool, is processed and the MDN comes back to XI perfectly.
    The issue here is :
    Irrespective of what is provided in the Server Certificate ( Keystore) , the message goes to my target test tool. I even left this field blank with no certificate entry and still the SSL connection was established and the message went to the target system.
    Is there no validation that XI does here? I am lost what is the use of this entry Server Certificate if XI blindly accepts all SSL connections.
    I am using a Decentral Adapter Engine with LoadBalancer.
    2. Client Auth on Receiver AS2 Adapter
    I tried to perform Client Authentication by proving my Server's private key in the AS2 adapter. The corresponding public key is loaded in my partner's Keystore.
    XI error's with the error "SSL handshake failed - Bad Certificate" .
    I am not sure why XI is erroring out here and I have a feeling that I have misunderstood the use of the fields in the AS2 adapter,
    Server Certificate ( Keystore) and Private Key for Client Authentication.
    Has anyone tried this? If further details are needed, I will be able to furnish the same.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

    Hello Jens,
    Thanks for your reply.
    1. The Encryption and Signature part of the Interface is working absolutely fine and I use the same concept highlighted by you - The Sender always signs the message with his private key and encrypts with message with the partner's public key in the corresponding agreement.
    2. Server SSL is also working perfectly fine, i.e, when XI initiates the connection the SSL connection is established to the partner.
    3. Mutual Auth was the issue where I was getting the bad certificate issue.
    To investigate further I moved the same setup to my Central Adapter Engine and all the issues I had described above seem to have vanished and things work exactly as I was expecting, ie.
    The field : Server Certificate (Keystore) is used to provide the Target System's Server SSL's public Certificate.
    The field : Private Key for Client Authentication is used where XI provides its own Server SSL's private key for Mutual / Client Authentication.
    The problem seems to be with my Decentral Adapter engine and not my central adapter engine and so I guess,
    1. I either have the incorrect certificates on my Decentral Adapter Engine.
    2. I also have 2 instances of a Decentral Adapter Engine with a Webdispatcher and so maybe the 2 Visual Admin's of the 2 Decentral AE are inconsistent.
    3. Maybe it was just a long day and I did something wrong
    Will investigate further for the root cause but I am glad that my concepts remain intact and things do work as I expected them to work.
    A blog on all this is on the cards sometime soon.
    Cheers,
    Bhavesh

  • How to stop the last rnto to be issue by the ftp adapter when downloading a file.

    The company that processes the ftp documents for a partner is a VAN and has a process where the ftp file sent is immediately moved to an archive upon download. The ftp adapter wants to rename the file after the download completes but the originally
    downloaded file is already gone and an error is returned.
    Is there a way to not issue the rnto or have the server process wait until the script is complete before moving the file.
    I don't have the time to write a custom ftp adapter, maybe a dotnet helper ftp process.
    Is there something simple  that can be done.
    Thanks
    Bico Bielich

    Maybe you can't if changing the Spool Folder doesn't change the behavior.
    Does the trading partner have or can they create a temp folder you can use?  You might even be able to create your own with a pre-command script.

  • Issues with signal input adaptive filtering, it won't filter the added noise from the input waveform

    Hello,
    I have an issue with my adaptive noise cancellation program. Essentially I want to input a custom wav add noise to it and then filter the noise away in order to gain the custom wav again.
    While doing so I want to read the learning curve and read the adaptive coefficients. Unfortunately I have an issue when it comes to the filtering of the custom wav+noise. It won't filter the signal at all.
    It would be helpful if someone could have a look at it and possibly help me out.
    Thanks!
    Attachments:
    Testing.vi ‏59 KB

    Hey Jan,
    Thanks for the reply. I am currently using the Adaptive Filter Toolkit in order to obtain those VIs. The VIs which are in use are the LMS Adaptive Filter ones. 
    I figured there might be an error with the input of the array. This VI requires a DBL Array but it seems like it can not process it. 
    The "Get Wavefirn Components" works better now but I still have an issue with a time. I put a 9s wav file in but it only computes it in a very short time and I can not play the file while it is computing.
    I added the modified program to the attachments. 
    This program is ought to read a waveform file add noise to it and then use an adaptive filter in order to get the orginal waveform back again and if possible either store or play the final waveform. 
    Thanks for your help.
    Attachments:
    Testing.vi ‏62 KB

  • Dynamic file naming with File/FTP adapter

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement for writing files with names of the files based on a customer ID.... a dynamic name based on a value retrieved from the customer DB.
    I have already tried using the dynamic file naming suggestion in the bpel dev guide, it does not work. I followed the instructions, the process fails to compile and throws "part" and "undefined variables" errors etc.
    Has anyone succesfully used file/ftp adapter to write files with dynamic file names (using a varibale), not %SEQ% or %datetime% formats?
    Thanks,
    Hasan

    You can create a header variable that will allow you to set the outbound file name inside the process. This variable is a message type. From the type chooser select:
    Message Types
    Partner Links
    Outbound Partner Link
    Outbound wsdl
    Message Types
    Imported WSDL
    fileAdapterOutboundHeader.wsdl
    OutboundHeader_msg
    This variable will have a part filename.
    Set this part to whatever you wish your file to be named.
    Select the invoke to your outbound file/ftp partnerlink. Move to the adapters tab and select the header variable you created as the Input Header Variable.

  • Issue with HAL essbase adapter

    Hi Experts
    I have an issue with HAL,I got the below error when I tried to use essbase adapter, the HAL version is 7
    java.Lang.NoClassDefFoundError
    I know this is known error ...most of the forums are telling this is error related to Environment Variables...but I dont know how to fix as I am unaware of this....java..... classes..bla bla bla..
    I installed HAL in c drive, Can anyone help me ...how to fix this issue....
    Thank You
    M.S

    Go to control panel->system->system properties->advance->environmental variables. You should have something like this "C:\Program Files\Vignette\V7\vbis\Hyperion\EssbaseAdapter" in your classpath variable. Check you installation on your "C:\" drive to get the correct path. Hope this helps.

  • Content based receiver determination with Seeburger AS2 adapter

    We are planning to use the Seeburger AS2 adapter on our XI 3.0 installation to post custom XML documents to XI from external business partners.  The problem we have is to do the receiver and interface determination based on the xml message type that is submitted.  How can we identify what is the name of the root xml node (which is representing the message type that was submitted to us) during the receiver determination and specify conditions for the receiver determination based on this?  We can not use the Seeburger Classifier module here as this is only determining the mapping name to be used for an EDI conversion but can not handle any type of XML message.

    Rudy,
    I think the easiest way would still be the ReceiverDetermination and creating an XSD that contains the main important TAGs from the different messages.
    That should allow you to test for the existing of certain important TAGs or check the value of some TAGS.
    I don´t know about aedaptive-adapters, but I don´t think that they are Drummond-Certified. Check out...
    http://www.drummondgroup.com/html-v2/as2-companies.html
    Without this certification, a lot of your partners might not allow you to use this adapter if you wanna make AS2 with them.
    Greetings
    Stefan

Maybe you are looking for