Issuing a handling unit to production order

Hi
Is it possible to issue a handling unit to production order. Kindly through some tips in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
Saravana Kumar

hi Sarvana,
a handling unit consists of altogether several contents items that are listed as
>full delivery items,
>partial delivery items,
>or even further handling units
So from the above the handling unit consist of the items for delivery and are packed in one packaging
material (box). The packaging material and the materials it contains form a handling unit that is
assigned to a delivery and can be moved within the warehouse. The content of the handling unit is not significant for Warehouse Management. In fact, the contents can only be determined by referring to the delivery.
So a HU can't be assigned to the production order within the same plant.
for further assistance you can check the following link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/16/4bad1ba63611d2b44e006094b9b9dd/frameset.htm.
hope this helps to answer your question,
with regards,

Similar Messages

How to create Handling Unit using Process Order no. & Packing Instruction

Hi experts,
Please guide me how to create Handling Unit using Process Order number & Packing Instruction reference?Noramlly this is done using standard transaction 'COWBPACK'.
ANY FUNCTION MODULE OR BAPI TO DO THIS.
if any solution please explain with proper example..
Thanks In advance
Thanks,
Yogesh

Hi experts,
Please guide me how to create Handling Unit using Process Order number & Packing Instruction reference?Noramlly this is done using standard transaction 'COWBPACK'.
ANY FUNCTION MODULE OR BAPI TO DO THIS.
if any solution please explain with proper example..
Thanks In advance
Thanks,
Yogesh

Issue regarding Batch determination in Production order as per Expiry date.

Dear all,
first of all happy Navratri.
I have issue regarding batch determination in production order.
I have to compare P.O header materialu2019s expiry date and issuing components expiry date at the time of batch determination.
lets take example, Material having self life is u201CXu201D years and batch determination against PO is based on FEFO with the help of self life we can determine Expiry date of manufacturing material suppose it is u201CYu201D I have to introduce restriction at the time of good issue if expiry date of issuing components u201CZu201D is less than expiry date u201CYu201D.
Please give your valuable suggestions either standard or through SAP enhancements.
thanks & Regards
SIVA

Dear
Thanks for your reply, i am layman about batch derivation can u elaborate it.
Thanks & Regard

Goods Issue To Each Operation Of Production Order?

As we know, in SAP ,when we create and realse the production order,we could posts good issue to the production order ,using MB1A. And in SAP , the components can be assigned to the operations of the finished product.
But in our company, the production order will take long time,and during production,different materials will be used in different phase of the production order,that means different components will be used for different operations.
And for some reason,we don't want our material to be backflushed during production.
So I want to ask can we post goods issue to each operation of the production order,not to the whole production order? Can SAP support Post Goods Issue To Each Operation Of Production Order?
What shall we do if we want do this?By ABAP development ? Or there is third party software
can do this with SAP?
Thanks for any reply!
Edited by: Fei Liu on Mar 14, 2009 4:56 PM

Hi Fei,
As explained above, i think the concept of releasing the individual operations instead of releasing the order at header level would work fine for your requirement.
Steps:
1. Go to operation page in co02.
2. Select the first operation, at the bottom of the screen you would find a Green Flag, click on the same.
3. You will now find that the status of the first operation has changed to REL, while the others are still not.
4. At header level you will find a status PREL, indicating partial release.
5. After completion of the first operation, confirm the same & select the second operation & click release, & the process follows in this manner
6. Please do not click the green flag at the header level as this will release the entire order.
Pre-requisite:
1. You have assigned components to the respective operations.
You might also want to consider the usage of trigger points. This you can assign to each operation, where-in if the status changes to CNF, you trigger the release of the following operation. But before opting for this flow, first do it manually to ensure it meets your need.
Also if the components assigned to the same operation, needs to be issued at different date, then you can use the lead time offset in BOM. In cs02, go to item details, here you can specify the same. Eg: If your operation stats on 15th March & you want this component to be issue only on 17th March, then specify the offset as 2. But if you want the components to be issued 2 days in advance of 15th march, then specify as 2-.
Hope the above helps.
Regards,
Vivek

To issue the component to the Production Order

Hello All,
I have assigned the component to the Operation of Production Order from Different plant(say 1100) of Same company code(1000).
I want to issue that material from that plant to this plant (say 1000) of Production Order.
So my question is the correct method of directly issuing the component to this Production Order of different plant.
Shailendra

Hi HAdkar
The correct procedure is .
You have to assign special procurement key 80 in material master for which you want to procure from plant 1100. The material master of procuring material should exist for the plant 1100. While running MPR the procurement proposal will be automatically created in the 1100 plant. From 1100 plant you do stock transfer to your storage location. Then finally do GI for the header prod order in you plant.
This is the procure in SAP. Eventhough both the plants exist in the same compound.
Regards
J . Saravan

How to allocate external process cost on the units of Production order

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a cost allocation issue.
The scenario is a make-to-stock scenario in discrete manufacturing industry. I am using production order (PP01) and confirming the material issued to production and operations manually. There is an electrical cost incurred by the client. The total cost of electricity is allocated on the number of units that comes out from the production. Say, total electrical cost is 1000, number of units produced using the production order is 100, then per unit is charged 10 (1000/100).
Can anyone help me how can I perform the cost allocation? Should I go for an activity type in work center OR should I use the cost sheet. Kindly help me.
Thanks and Regards,

Hi
activity type would be better choice...
Ajay M

Issue in Handling Unit creation.

Dear All,
We are using Handling Units functionality in the process order. We are doing packing after confirmation, at the time of packing system is creating HU for those quantities which were confirmed at the last operation. E.g. Confirmation quantity is 90 and order quantity is 100 then system is creating HU for 90 quantities. This is working absolutely fine.
If confirmed quantity is greater than Order quantity, then system is packing the quantities as per the order header quantity only. E g. Confirmation quantity is 110 but Order quantity is 100 then system is creating HU for the 100 quantity only. In this case system should create HU for all the confirmed quantities.
How to solve this issue. Thanks in advance.
Regards
Amit

Hello Amit,
Can you please provide the step you are doing in this process. Hope packing is being done automatically during confirmation.
Regards,
Sana

Consumption acct of materia which issue to maint. ord. and production order

Hi all,
I have one problem with the cost report for maintenance orders.
I have one material code, such as we call A.
Mat. A is issued to production order and also maintenance order.
For production order, consumption account is 123
For maintenance order, consumption account is 456
I have defined new movement type for issuing to Maintenance order is ZB1
in OBYC:
      GBB - VRB --> 123
      ZB1 --> 456
So for accounting purpose, I can slit these consumption accounts
However, when I go to maintenance order cost reports, systems slit these cost into 2 line
Material A        Acct. Cons 123        Plan cost 100        Actual cost 0
Material   A        Acct. Cons 456       Plan cost 0            Actual cost 120
How can I group into 1 line ?
Edited by: Emily Nguyen on Jun 2, 2009 12:15 PM

Hi Emily
In OBYC you can configure GL accounts per valuation class.
You cannot configure Movement type wise. Each General modifier is linked with movement types.
We cannot give two consumption accounts for one valuation class in VBR.
Run your plan cost again.
Thanks
Kiran A

No. range issue : at the time of production order settlement

Hi expert,
My user is unable to settle production order due no no range issue:
Short text of error message:
Document number 9000 20001 2008 was already assigned
Technical information about the message:
Diagnosis
     Document number 20001 in company code 9000 and fiscal year
     already been assigned.
System response
     Termination of processing.
Procedure
     Check document number range 02 in company code 9000 and fi
     2008 and correct the number range status if necessary.
Message classe...... "F5"
Number.............. 152
Variable 1.......... 9000
Variable 2.......... 20001
Variable 3.......... 2008
Variable 4.......... 02
Variable 3.......... 2008
Variable 4.......... 02
Pl advise.
Regards,
Samar

Hi experts,
Thaks for the reply.
Pl advise what is the configuration/T code to be maintained for no range
Regards,
Samar

RE: Goods issue posting through Migo for Production Order

I have released the production order, when I want to post the goods issue through migo to the concerned order I am getting error saying that material "No components exist but there was stock in the storage location for unresticted use.
I have checked through MMbe transaction.

Are there components in the Production Order? If yes, is the reservation created and movement allowed for the reservation?
Lakshman

Goods Issue Control & confirmation control for Production Order.

Dear ALL,
Please let me know how to control,
1) Unauthorised consumption of component quantities in excess of quantity defined in BOM?
2) Posting of Confirmation (At operation Level) against production order for which no components have been issue?
3) Posting of goods receipt against production order for which no components have been issued or no confirmations have been posted?
4) Posting of goods reversal quantity in excess to issued quantity.
Regards,

Prashant,
Not all the requirements you mentioned can be controlled in Standard SAP system. For some of the requirements you could configure User status (Tcode :BS02).
exmaple :
Posting of Confirmation (At operation Level) against production order for which no components have been issue?
SET user status XX on Business transaction : Release that forbids CONF.
SET another user status YY on Business transaction : Goods movement that allows confirmation.
With this kind of tricky user status you can control/prevent some transactions in production order till certain transactions are done.
I know this is not the ideal solution but I have used it for various purposes to meet certain business needs.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks,
Ram

Issue more than Planned in Production Order

Hi All,
I have a problem with 2007B SP00 PL11 for Issue for Production.
In 2005B, I can issue the BOM Components more than planned. But in 2007B version, I am unable to issue more than planned. When I right-click at Production Order to Issue Component or at Issue for Production and copy from Production order. no items are displayed.
I have already issued in full at the 1st issue. Then subsequently, i need to issue some more qty for certain components. But i am unable to do that.
Has this feature of issue more been changed in 2007B?
What other method can be adopted without changing the planned qty?
Please advise.
Regards
Jessie

Hi guys,
Thanks for the fast response.
Duplicate the previous issue to create the over-issue is not a good solution. It is very troublesome. itis not a good procedure to ask customers to do this step.
Changing of the planned qty will mean that i am not able to trace my initial plan and have to go back to the BOM. again, this is not logical. especially when the queries are using figures directly from production order tables.
Since it can be done in 2005 version, why is SAP taking it out this feature in 2007?

Creation of Handling Units at Sales Order Level

Hi Experts ,
Please let me know,how can a handling unit be created at sales order level.
Your comments will be appreciated
Regards
Albert

Hi,
In industry solution - automotive solution, this can be done by HUP12 - create planned HU's for sales order.
In generic SAP, this can not be done.
Hope this helps.
Harry

Issue in committing material for production order

Hi, we are facing an error situation that when we try to release production order there came an issue that few component committed quantity is less than required quantity. When we check the stock of the components they were having enough stock to consider for this production order.
What could be the other reasons or cause for this situation. Can any one suggest for the correction action.
would reservation cause this problem when i check the component availability overview it has ATP 0.   will it cause this.
When i look in to the system there were several Orders that were in CRT state that were using same components as used in the current order under discussion.
Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 3:16 AM

Hi All
Even MD04 also seems to be showing as if the material is available. Pl. see the data against 13/12 hereunder.
06.01.2011     Stock                                                            6,370/      6,370
08.12.2010     Ord.DS     4604767106/00100                         80-/     6,290
09.12.2010     OrdRes     420252                         2,740-/     3,550
13.12.2010     OrdRes     420268                         3,420-/     130
availability overview CO09 shows as follows for the component:
13.12.2010     OrdRes     Totals record     3,420-(receipt/req)       0(confirmed)
13.12.2010     OrdRes     420268                          3,420-(receipt/req)        0(confirmed)                       0(ATP quantity)
scope of check:
to include
purchase order
include dependent requirements
sales requirements
deliveries
include shipment notifications
all reservations
check releases for transport orders only
take all productions orders into account.
With this scenario what can i do get it working.
Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 6:46 AM
Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 6:59 AM
Edited by: kkr_chandran66 on Jan 6, 2011 7:00 AM

Performance Issue, Unable to pull all production Orders in given statuses

HI All,
I have a requirement to pull all production orders that are in the created or released status and then action some different things in the program such as adjusting dates, etc. The issue I'm having is that as the volume of production orders grows the select statement stops being able to complete and pull these production orders. I've tweaked this before and it was able to work for a few weeks but has now reached it's limit again. I tried using the trace and SE30 to analyze the program as I've read suggested here, however it's been difficult to try adjustments as the program runs in about 3 second in the development environment. Our quality environment, which has roughly half the volume of the production system ran in about 15 seconds. So I am unable to duplicate the issue until the program is moved to production.
Here is the select statement:
SELECT k~aufnr
    FROM aufk as k INNER JOIN afko as f ON f~aufnr = k~aufnr
      INNER JOIN jest as j ON k~objnr = j~objnr
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_aufk
    WHERE k~aufnr IN s_aufnr     "Order Number select option
      AND k~werks IN s_werks             "Plant select option
      AND k~auart EQ u2018PP01u2019              "PP01 std orders only
      AND k~kokrs EQ u20181000u2019              "Seneca Controlling Area
      AND k~autyp EQ u201810u2019                "PP Production Order
      AND k~loekz EQ space                 "Deletion indicator
      AND ( j~stat EQ u2018I001u2019             "CTRD, created status
        OR j~stat EQ u2018I002u2019 )           "REL, released status
      AND j~inact EQ space.              "status not inactive
There are a couple thoughts I have to try, but I don't know of any good way to verify if helping given the volume differences until in production so am looking for feedback. Here's the ideas:
1. Use the field IDAT2 in AUFK to determine if an order is not TECO'd , rather than using the JEST table. Testing this in Dev had increased run time versus how I have it written now, but may be helpful with larger volume and/or if an index is put on this field. Thoughts?
2. Separate the select statements to read AUFK and JEST separately and instead use the FOR ALL ENTRIES command. Seems to be a lot of conflicting thoughts on which works better, thoughts on this particular case?
Also, there is another program that pulls only production orders in Created status, and it doesn't have this same issue.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Kyndal
Edited by: Kyndal Copley on Oct 1, 2009 6:46 PM

I have three recommendations for your join.
1) Assuming that fields AUART and KOKRS are always known (constants) I recommend that you move them up in the where clause (like illustrated) to ensure that the system uses index C.
2) AUTYP EQ '10' seems superflous. In addition it seems to increase the search time. Check with your functional consultant if there could be a production order with AUART EQ 'PP01' and AUTYP NE '10'. If you will never encounter this situation it makes more sense to drop the clause AUTYP EQ '10'.
3) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE usually takes longer than INTO TABLE. Define the table with AUFK with just field AUFNR so that you can use the clause INTO TABLE.
SELECT k~aufnr
FROM       aufk AS k
INNER JOIN afko AS f
ON f~aufnr EQ k~aufnr
INNER JOIN jest AS j
ON k~objnr EQ j~objnr
INTO TABLE it_aufk
WHERE k~auart EQ 'PP01'
AND   k~kokrs EQ '1000'
AND   k~aufnr IN s_aufnr
AND   k~werks IN s_werks
AND   k~loekz EQ space
AND ( j~stat EQ 'I001' OR j~stat EQ 'I002' )
AND   j~inact EQ space.

Issuing a handling unit to production order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for