It shows less memory. why?!

i have a 3220 mobile phone, and my pc suite is working properly. and i don't have problems.
my only difficulty is that when i use the application installer, it shows that i have 119kb free memory on the phone, when, on the phone it shows 504kb!!!
what is happening? why is that? do i have to do something? is there something wrong with my phone?
pls help me.
10q

Sounds to me like it's indicating that you have 119kb free for use with installing applications... the memory on your phone will be split up with some free for aplication installation, some free for gallery data etc... doesn't sound like there's a problem to me.

Similar Messages

Why Photoshop CC is showing less memory rather then the installed?

Dear all,
in my Windows 8 (64 bit) I've 12 GB of RAM installed, but oddly Photoshop CC 64 bit shows only 3255 available RAM.
This is blocking me from on using some expensive tool like content aware fill, because I get "not enough memory".
Who can help?
Thanks
Nadia

You are using the 32bit version. Both 32 and 64bit versions are installed. You need to find the 64bit version.

Itunes shows less memory than on my Ipod

I just purchased an Ipod picture/video 30gb, I have loaded 3376 songs into Itunes and Ipod so far, no pic's or videos, which comes out to 12.13gb. One day I received a "corrupt file" message in the bottom of my computer related to my Ipod. Itunes and Ipod still run ok, but now my Ipod indicates it only has about 4.6gb of memory remaining from Itunes. I checked memory on my Ipod and it is accurate stating 12.13gb have been used. Why is Itunes indicating that I only have 4.6gb remaining on my Ipod, is there a way to fix this?
dell 4500s Windows XP

Please clarify.
How do you get the audio from a TV show if the show doesn't appear on the iPod? Is it that the show really is there but that the video doesn't appear? If that's the case, check your TV Out setting.

Why is 8gb only showing total memory of less than 6.5?

why is 8gb only showing total memory of less than 6.5?

Because the difference is due to the operating system taking up most of the diference and the other is how GB is advertised and actually used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabyte

Weird! U350 + Win7 - shows less usable memory (2.84GB) with 4GB than with 3GB?

Hi,
I have a Ideapad U350, which came with Windows 7 32-bit, and 3GB of memory.
I just wanted to extend the RAM so installed instead of the 1GB of RAM a new one of 2GB. Before, Windows 7 shows "3GB installed and 2.87GB usable" but now, it shows "4GB installed and 2.84GB usable".
Now, I know that 32-bit Windows 7 will typically only show something less than 4GB if 4GB is installed, but I was really surprised that when I had the 2x2GB memory installed, Windows 7 showed 2.84GB!!!
In other words, Windows 7 32-bit is showing less usable memory when the 4GB (2x2GB) memory is installed, than when 3GB (2GB + 1GB) memory is installed...
I'm kind of puzzled about this. Just to be clear, as I said above, I *KNOW* that with 32-bit Win7, it wouldn't show the full 4GB, but I expected something like 3+GB usable with the 4GB, not < 3GB!!!
Can anyone here explain why this is happening?
Thanks,
Dragos
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Re-seating the RAM modules didn't solve the problem. I suppose that this issue is because I installed some 32-bit applications. I think I must avoid this and install ONLY 64-bit apps. For example I installed the 32-bit MS Office 2007 suite because some time ago I bought a license for 32-bit. I will reinstall the 64-bit OS version and will get back with conclusions/solution. Thanks for your support.

Activity monitor says I have 1 -3% of System Memory free, yet CPU usage shows less than 10% total of all processes

Activity monitor says I have 1 -3% of System Memory free, yet CPU usage shows less than 10% total of all processes

I think you should review what you wrote. There is no question, hence, my reply. I can't tell by the AM listing what applications are using memory. You need to click on the Real Mem column once or twice to display in descending order.
Aside from what you see in AM, what exactly is your problem or perceived problem. You are very low on Free Mem at the moment the screen shot was taken. Those displays are not depicting your computer's instantaneous memory usage.
About OS X Memory Management and Usage
Using Activity Monitor to read System Memory & determine how much RAM is used
Memory Management in Mac OS X
Performance Guidelines- Memory Management in Mac OS X
A detailed look at memory usage in OS X
Memory Usage Performance Guidelines- About the Virtual Memory System
Understanding top output in the Terminal
The amount of available RAM for applications is the sum of Free RAM and Inactive RAM. This will change as applications are opened and closed or change from active to inactive status. The Swap figure represents an estimate of the total amount of swap space required for VM if used, but does not necessarily indicate the actual size of the existing swap file. If you are really in need of more RAM that would be indicated by how frequently the system uses VM. If you open the Terminal and run the top command at the prompt you will find information reported on Pageins () and Pageouts (). Pageouts () is the important figure. If the value in the parentheses is 0 (zero) then OS X is not making instantaneous use of VM which means you have adequate physical RAM for the system with the applications you have loaded. If the figure in parentheses is running positive and your hard drive is constantly being used (thrashing) then you need more physical RAM.
Adding RAM only makes it possible to run more programs concurrently. It doesn't speed up the computer nor make games run faster. What it can do is prevent the system from having to use disk-based VM when it runs out of RAM because you are trying to run too many applications concurrently or using applications that are extremely RAM dependent. It will improve the performance of applications that run mostly in RAM or when loading programs.

Why export dump shows less than the actual size?

why export dump shows less than the actual size?

i tried to find to find out the logical size using the following command
select sum(bytes/1024/1024) from dba_segments;
SUM(BYTES/1024/1024)
739when i tried the following query removing index segement:
select sum(bytes/1024/1024) from dba_segments where SEGMENT_TYPE \<\> 'INDEX' ;
SUM(BYTES/1024/1024)
535What other type of information is not exported in a full database export?

Showing less data at retrival time

Hi Everyone,
I have a datafile with me to load the data into cube.when i am loading the data it is loading succeesfully with out any error but at the time of retrival of data it is showing less when i compared with my original data.
Then i checked the data in cube based on agents hierarchy and i observed data for some of the agents are loosing because that agent is parent for some members so the children data is overwriting the parent data when we run default calc all but i have the data for that parent itself in our data file.like
for example
A is parent B and C is children of A when we run default calc Band C data is overwriting the A's data but i have the data for 'A' also. like this i am loosing the data of A but i need to maintain the A' s data also.For this i created 'A' itself as a child under it and i renamed the parent A like A(Supervisor).
like A(Supervisor)Parent and A,b,c are children
Like this i am getting the correct data but i am doing all this modificaions manually by identifying manually.
I have around 23000 agents are there with different hierarchies so i am getting very difficult to identify and add like this manually.
Is there any script to write to solve this problem like if we miss any data is should take care about (or)
Is there any other method to do this task faster.
If any one knows please tell me how to proceed in this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Sravan

You can create an adjustment account under A called A_adj, load data to A, B, and C, then before you consolidate, write a script that goes through and calculates the adjustment (A_adj) by taking the difference between A and B + C. "A_adj" = "A" - ("B"+"C");
Now to get all this to work dynamically will take some work but using @CHILDREN and @CONCAT functions along with @CURRMBR, should get it done. As for performance, that would remain to be seen.
Is there any particular reason why your supporting detail doesn't support the totals you are getting? Perhaps you should be going back to the source and getting a better data feed that has all the correct numbers in it. I know you can't always do that, but before engineering a big work around, I would take a pass at the source and see if you can get better data to begin with.

HT1848 On itunes, when synced to my pc, I show less than half of the music that is on my iphone 4. How do I get all the music onto my pc?

I am about to scream if I don't figure this out or just decide to leave Apple and get a Galaxy phone. On itunes, when synced to my pc, I show less than half of the music that is on my iphone 4. How do I get all the music onto my pc? I have read many forums and tried many things, but apple/iTunes is not intuitive at least not on a PC. When I go to devices it won't let me select "transfer music". It's grayed out. Why is this and what can I do? I'd like to delete some of the music off of my iPhone but don't want it gone forever. Pleae help.

Thanks Turingtest2,
I appreciate your response. I have done all of the things mentioned, but still when I click on "devices", the "transfer music" option is still not selectable. I see it, but can't select it. I am running Windows 7 on my PC.
However, one thing I read makes me take pause. At one point I did erase my computer back to factory settings using the mirrored image. We backed up all information and put the important stuff back on, but I don't believe we did anything with iTunes, so it's a possibility that the music that is in my library now, may only be music I have purchased since then. But, (thinking out loud) that was a while ago and I am pretty sure I have purchased more music than what is in my iTunes library, since then. Maybe I will approach it from that angle and see what happens.
It just doesn't make any logical sense that syncing goes from computer to device. Ostensibly then, my iPhone would only have the music that is on my computer after syncing and that is not the case. I still have all my music on my phone. I can see the new music that's on my phone get added to my iTunes library when I connect, which would make one think that syncing occurs both ways. I don't know. It's maddening. Maybe I should just follow my husbands advice and go to an Android. LOL. Or maybe I will take my laptop and phone to the Apple store and make them figure it out. Ha.
If you have any thoughts about this, let me know. Thanks again.

Byref or Byval - which is faster and consume less memory ?

Hello !
I'm using vb.net 2013.
I have a situation when I need to pass as parameter some controls like Buttons. checkboxes and also a Bindingsource and an Entity.
Both Byref and Byval are working in my case.
but I'm asking :
- Which of them is faster and consume less memory ?
Thank you !

I have observed ByVal to be faster
Passing a value variable ByRef requires it to be boxed. That's what's taking the extra time in this example. OP is passing reference variables. Rerunning the text with a reference variable passed ByVal or ByRef would remove the difference in
speed even for that number of cycles.
Actually, Acamar is right. Used this way, ByRef is faster. But it doesn't matter. Speed and memory consumption is not the basis that a decision to use byref or byval should be made upon. That is the main point I wanted to make
Option Strict On
Option Explicit On
Option Infer Off
Public Class Form1
Private Sub btnExample_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles btnExample.Click
Dim s1, s2 As New Stopwatch
Dim testLoopCount As Integer = 100000000
s1.Start()
For I As Integer = 1 To testLoopCount
test1(1)
Next
s1.Stop()
s2.Start()
For I As Integer = 1 To testLoopCount
test2(1)
Next
s2.Stop()
Dim result1 As String = String.Format("ByRef ElapsedMilliseconds:{0}", s1.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString)
Dim result2 As String = String.Format("ByVal ElapsedMilliseconds:{0}", s2.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString)
Dim resultMsg As String = String.Format("{0}" & vbCrLf & "{1}", result1, result2)
MessageBox.Show(resultMsg)
End Sub
Sub test1(ByRef val As Integer)
End Sub
Sub test2(ByVal val As Integer)
End Sub
End Class
“If you want something you've never had, you need to do something you've never done.”
Don't forget to mark
helpful posts and answers
! Answer an interesting question? Write a
new article
about it! My Articles
*This post does not reflect the opinion of Microsoft, or its employees.

What can I tune to make the database use less memory in a 1GB ram notebook?

Hi,
Our notebook has 1GB ram only, running Windows XP Pro, Oracle10g Database, Oracle9i Application Server. It consumes about 1.4 - 1.5GB ram where it's already start using the virtual memory, therefore have some performance issue with it especially when try to startup the services.
I'm not a DBA but I would like to get some advice on what and how can I tune the database to use less memory since the notebook is used for demo application only, so we save memory resource and make the notebook runs faster.
Please advise.
Thank you.

Application Server 10gR1, 10gR2 is certified against WinXP:
XP      10g (9.0.4.0.1)      N/A      Desupported       None       Yes      N/A
XP      10g (9.0.4)      N/A      Desupported      None      Yes      N/A
XP      10g (10.1.3.1.0)      N/A      Certified      Yes      None      None
XP SP2+      10g (10.1.3.0.0)      N/A      Certified      None      Yes      Yes
XP SP2      10g (10.1.2.0.2)      N/A      Certified      None      Yes      Yes
XP SP2      10g (10.1.2.0.1)      N/A      Certified      None      Yes      Yes
XP Xeon      10g (10.1.2.0.0)      N/A      Certified      None      Yes      Yes
XP      10g (10.1.2.0.0)      N/A      Certified      None      Yes      Yes
XP      9.0.3      N/A      Desupported      None      Yes      N/A
XP      9.0.2.0.1      N/A      Desupported      None      None      N/ADessupported means Oracle will no longer produce patches or provide maintenance for the version, so in case you hit some new bug the only alternative will be to work with a higher version.
In your case you could use 10g on XP. The only XP not supported is Home Edition.
Coming back to the issue, since 9iR2 Oracle recommendation is to provide 1G for each AS node (infrastructure and middle tier). If you have this on the same box, by itself on the Enterprise install will consume more than 1G.
Tuning 10g database won't make much difference. If you install AS 10gR2 it includes a 10gR1 Database as infrastructure database you could use for demo purposes.
~ Madrid.

EPM 2013 Report is displayed as cut off and shows less than half the width of the report in IE 10 and IE 9.

EPM 2013 Report is displayed as cut off and shows less than half the width of the report in IE 10 and IE 9. This issue occurs for some users only.I tried the same url in google chrome and is working fine.
Can you please help.
Please find the attached screenshot.

Hi BJ1986,
According to your description, I think this issue is caused by the IE browser that runs the report. To trouble shoot this issue, I suggest that we can try to clear internet temporary files, cookies and others in IE browser. And also add this site
as a trusted site in IE browser to check this issue again.
If this issue is still existed, it can also be occurred due to the setting or third party add-ons of Internet Explorer (IE). In this scenario, you can try to run IE in compatibility mode to check the issue again. Or I suggest that you can refer to the
steps below to troubleshoot the issue:
Click Tools -> Internet options.
Switch to the Security tab, click Local intranet, and then select Default level.
Switch to the Advanced tab, and click Restore advanced settings.
Temporarily disable third party add-ons. For detailed steps, please see the link below:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-IN/internet-explorer/manage-add-ons#ie
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

I imported some 24P HD videos from my DSLR to Aperture but these videos do not show up in iMovie '09 for editing purposes. Although my previous 24P HD Videos from iPhoto '09 show up. Why can't I access these videos stored in Aperture library?

I imported some 24P HD videos from my DSLR to Aperture but these videos do not show up in iMovie '09 for editing purposes. Although my previous 24P HD Videos from iPhoto '09 show up. Why can't I access these videos stored in Aperture library? I assumed that like the videos in iPhoto, I would be able to access the videos in Aperture through iMovie. Come on Apple! I am starting to get frustrated with your products here. And this is saying a lot when I have been using and loving apple products for the last 4 years.

Hi. My camera is a Canon 600D. And yes my videos are stored in the Aperture library and they are not referenced. Even then I tried to select all the videos in Aperture and clicked 'consolidate masters' and there was a messge that said all 'none of the files are referenced',... so they didn't need consolidating.
I also tried preferences> export> external video editor > choose > iMovie. And then right click on the video to edit with imovie. Even then the video didn't show up in iMovie. It seems like the only option for me is to import the videos directly to iMovie which means there will be two versions of the same file stored in my computer eating up space.
APPLE. What are you doing?

All the sudden my iPod shuffle no longer shows up in my devices on my computer nor does iTunes show it? Why would this happen? How can i fix this? Anyone know?

All the sudden my iPod shuffle no longer shows up in my devices on my computer nor does iTunes show it? Why would this happen? How can i fix this? Anyone know?

Start with the "Shuffle not recognized" section in this Apple support document.
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1412#q2
B-rock

Synching iPad to older PC with less memory - it ran out of space when synching movies - how to synch in the future if we can't free up more space (besides buying a new computer)

In synching ****...
Tried to synch iPad with several movies with a PC that turns out to have less memory than what we were synching.
Turned off synching of movies to try to help the situation...
WRONG!
Two of our purchased movies were deleted in the synch process.
We got them out of the PCs recycle bin but now how have them on the PC, but not on the iPad.
How do we (a) get the movies back on to the iPad and
(b) solve the longer-term issue of synching if the PC can't hold as much as the iPad does?

He doent have to , we already know he's got a xp machines, and from the fact that he's able to sync his iPad to it tells me enough, it's enough to know he has the basic requirements to connect an external drive via USB, now we know it's an older machine so it more than likely he's got a ton of .tmp files taking up space,and the fact that he's asking this question makes me think he may not be aware of how to search the HD via *.tmp from the command line to location and delete those files, so w/o buying a new machine, his only option is intsalling a new Internal or external hard drive.

It shows less memory. why?!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for