IT0007 Change Mid Month/Payroll error

Geeks,
I have a situation wherein I need to change the WSR of a employee mid- month - which I did thru PA30 by creating a new IT7 with start date as 14 july 2014 (below is the overview screen shot of IT7 after change)
With Basic as 5000, I ran his payroll from 01-july 2014 to 31-july 2014, but when I look the form, its displaying Basic as 3518 (I haven assigned any unpaid or LOP). Can anybody help me out in knowing wht mistake m I doing?
regards
Tahir

In the IT to or from INP1, I can see that the Partial Period Parameters WageTypes /801, /802, /803 and /806 all total 100% (or 10.000,000), while /804 totals 70.37% and /805 totals 174.19%.
In the IT from XVAL, it can be seen that all valued WageTypes were done so by using /804.
I am not familiar with Payroll for India, but here are a two questions :
1 - If your Payroll Schema includes function PRINT with Par1 = NP and Par2 = PART, check your Partial Period Parameters and try to identify why /804 totals 70.37%.
2 - What kind of Absences or Attendances has the employee to justify that ratio?
You have mentioned that "Basic Salary" WT 1000 has Pr.Cl.10 with value 04, meaning that Partial Period Parameter /804 will be used for the factoring of that WT, and that is what happens.
The solution to your problem lies in understanding why the factors /802 and /804 are identical for the first portion of the payroll period but are different for the second part of the period.
3   /802   01     40 740,74
3   /802   02     59 259,26
3   /804   01     40 740,74
3   /804   02     29 626,63

Similar Messages

Plan Changes Mid-Month

I changed my plan from 1400 min to 2000 min mid-month. If I would not have changed my plan, I would have been charged 32 minutes overage. Because I increased my plan by 600 minutes, I was charged 162 minutes overage. This absolutely makes no sense! Customer service simply says it was explained on the web site as being pro-rated. I did not understand that and the explanation on the web site may only make sense to a trained service representative with a calculator! II feel this is the biggest bait and switch ever.

When you change your plan in a billing period, if you do not backdate the change, what happens is the bill is prorated for each plan.
For example. Lets say you changed on the 15th day of a 30 day billing period. You would be allotted only 700 minutes the first 15 days before overages occur. Then 1000 minutes the last 15 days before overages occur.
Actually online, it is spelled out very clearly. It states if you choose today, the change may result in overages due to proration. And explains why backdating is best,

Costing Sheet Overhead Rate Change Mid Month

Does SAP Support a mid month overhead rate change in a costing sheet? I have an overhead rate change effective 5/12/2007, but my PM Order is not recognizing the change unless the Basic Start Date of the order is 6/1/2007.

hi
it will not support mid month overhead. it should be either period basis or yearly basis.
regards,
siva

Mid month payroll area change

Hi,
i am at the client site and I have been asked to change the payroll area of few employees in the system but system is not allowing me to do that.
What is the best possible solution so that i can change the payroll area so that the changes are reflected in the payroll cycle of the same month?
Regards
Aryan

For this ,
You need to log in SAP system
Once you log in the system then give the TCODE PA30 ( Maintain HR DATA )
Once that screen has appier then you need to give the PERNR No for whome you need to change the Payroll Area.
Give the PERNR No.
Give the infotype 001 ( Organizational Assignment ) and click up on the change ......
Once you get Screen "Change Orgnazation Assigment" you can see the field "Payr.area" give the appropriate Payr.area and save .............
Like this you can change the Payr.area for the Personal NO

Mid Month Transfer Issue in Payroll

Hello All
Good Day!
We have two payrolls defined, Payroll A and Payroll B and both has separate Legal entity but Business Group for both Payroll is same. We are having an issue when employee transfers from Payroll A to B or vice versa as mentioned below :
1) Lets assume Employee transfers from Payroll A to Payroll B as on 17 Oct 2012.
2) As Business Group is same , employee remain in the same BG.
3) So we tried to terminate the employee as on 17-Oct-2012 and re-hired as on 18-Oct-2012 in the Payroll B. We need two IRP5 (tax certificate) so we need to terminate the employee from one payroll and reinstate in new payroll.
4)) We have most of the recurring element configured to Terminate as Last Standard Process so all the recurring elements ended as on 31-Oct-2012, i think this should have been Actual Termination Date but as Payroll is running from last 2 years so this will be too big to change now.
5) Now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee got full month salary in Payroll A which is not correct as employee worked up to 17-Oct-2012.
6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
Could you please provide your input as what is the best practice to handle this mid month transfer ?
Thanks
Gaurav

Hi, Gaurav..
6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
=>I guess.. The "Final Process Date" set as 31-Oct-2012 when you end this employee, isn't it?
Actual Termination Date will let person end at this date, that's mean person record's effective_end_date will equal to the Actual Termination Date and create a new person record after Actual Termination Date.
Last Standard Process Date let all elements ended as this date.
Final Process Date means you can process payroll run before this date, and the assignment record's effective_end_date will equal to Final Process Date. That's why your payroll run includes this person. There's no elements because all elements ended on 17-Oct-2012, system doesn't get any element on 31-Oct-2012.
Best Regards,
Changhua

Posting error..mid month cost cenre chenged

Hi All
One employee transferred (18.04.2011) mid month. So i have changed position (cost centre also), then employee have one cost centre in 01.04.2011 to 17.04.2011 and from 18.04.2011 onwards in another cost centre. While doing posting (PC00_M99_CIPE) system is showing below error.
u201CBalancing field "Profit Centre" in line item 009 not filledu201D Message no. GLT2201u201D
Here, line item 009 is /559(bank transfer wage type)
Thanks and Regards
Madhu Bijjala

Hello Madhu,
Please check with the Finance team. Some of the settins related to cost center and profit center needs to be changed.
Check the below thread for your reference.
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Hope this helps.
Best Regards.
Karan.

Problem in Payroll (mid month payment)

Dear All,
We have Monthly Payroll type. But I have to make incentive and some arrears payments in mid of May, 2010 that is after the execution of April Payroll and before execution of May Payroll.
Please suggest how this can be done?
Regards,
Kanupriya

Hi Kanupriya,
You need to some configuration in the SPRO path provided below.
SPRO --> Payroll --> Payroll - USA --> Off-Cycle Activities
Then maintain 0267 with off cycle reason
Run off cycle Payroll using off cycle reason
The go to Work bench for Off-cycle - Transaction Code PUOC_10
Clik on History tab - chceck result - and Save result.
Regards
Venu

Changing Plan Mid-month "pro-rated" unclear and deceptive practice. C.S. offers no help

I recently found myself having to up my plan minutes for a family emergency. I went online and checked my usage I was at 394 minutes out of a 450 minute plan, so I elected to switch to the 900 plan minute for the month, ancipating I would go over in the next week. I was given options to back date it or start on that day, as I had clearly not gone over my alloted minutes, I chose to start it as of that day.
My Bill came and I received 69 dollars in minute overages. How was this explained, that by prorating the bill, they divide the cylcel in half, not only by "dollars" which seemed to be the explantion I received online, but by minutes. SO my minute alotment of 450 was reduced to 240 for those two weeks I oriignally had 450 minutes in. They billed as if that was my allowance therefore saying I now went over my plan by 154 minute which I was billed to the tune of 69.00 dollars, plus the addition of the monthly increase in plan.
My question to any logical rational intelligent person would be, why would someone choose to up there minute plan, before they went over, just to then be charged for minutes they would not have been had they not upped there plan to the next level. This defies common sense and any explanation would as well.
Customer service sadly would not even hear or understand this, only to say this is a valid "cost" and I should have read the "disclosure" statement or called if I had questions and not use online services. I asked both the operator and a supervisor for the terms of the disclosure agrement and neither could tell me what it said. However in reading billing question answers they respond "For example, if you changed rate plans during the middle of your billing cycle, your statement should contain a charge for the old rate plan (according to the number of days in your cycle that you were on the old rate plan) and the new rate plan. " yes that makes sense but no where does it say your minutes may be reduced up until this point and you may occur additional charges not already used. by ironically "increasing your minute plan".
I am waiting for a manager to return my call, As a long time customer of verizon whom have promoted them and the new iphone all over facebook and such to my friends I am very discouraged by this practice, and the lack of resolve.

Mike I appreciate that at least you are familiar with what the disclosure statement says, despite othert reps not being able to recite it. However the term "may" be in inself is Misleading, if "airtime" is prorated the statement should read "YOUR airtime MINUTES will be prorated and reduced to this point, possibly resulting in overages and additional charges" The wording is intentionally misleading. If it weren't MIke, why would anyone KNowingly select an option that would then cause them to owe an additional 69.00 dollars they didnt owe at the time, when UPPING their PLAN?
The fact that Customer Service Can't see that as a very real possiblity and just is dissmisive saying You should have read the disclosure statement., and it is a valid charge tells, me they run into this frequently and they have a script to read from to cover themselves, leaving the HUman Element out of the equation. It is sad enough I had to Up my plan only temporarily while dealing with a tragic family situation, to add insult to injury. To me the term "may" be prorated and "may" result in additional overages meant, that if I had gone over my minutes prior to the change I would be charged, because MIKE that is COMMON SENSE. and a REASONABLE person May think that. Cutomer Service Reps could at least acknowledge that as a very real Understanding of how that line could be interupted, and that a reasonable person would not otherwise increase their plan only to be charge for something they would not have otherwise been charged.
I am almost positive in the Future this wording will be Changed after the continued Myriad of complaints. From what I already understand the new "changing minutes and not plan" option already has changed it. SO why not make things right for long time loyal customers now. I actually want to reduce my plan back down now as it was a temporary emergency however I DONT dare do it mid month again, SO I will wait another 2 weeks and pay even more.
This is NOT ME and my misunderstanding, just googling the topic comes up with tons and tons of complaints, articles written on the topic and so fourth. I have been waiting days for someone as promised to call me back as well and that hasnt happened. I have talked to so many friends about this many verizon customers and all say this can't be right, because it DOESNT MAKE SENSE, despite it being "valid" as you say.

Mid month Hiring payroll

Hi,
There is a scenario, when we hire a person in mid month, so how payroll driver will calculate its payroll.
Do we need to run payroll twice for this employee.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi,
If it is monthly payroll, no need to run payroll in mid month, we can run the payroll as usual like end of the month(whenever we are running payroll that date).
For mid month of joinging employes, system will take care with the help of INP1 rule for india, XPPF rule for internaational.
No need to run twice payroll.
Based his/her joining date payment will be happen.
Regards
Devi.

How to handle mid month proration in a calendar to month payroll

Appreciate if some 1 can help in handling the mid month proration in a calendar to month payroll.
i.e if an employee desides to quit his job by giving a 24 hours notice say in the middle of the month, then how can one handle such cases in monthly payroll calculations?
Plz help me......!
regards

1. Create a Proration Event Group grouping all the events (here date track update on assignment_status_id of per_all_assignments_f). Attach the event group to elements that you want to prorate.
2. Write a Proration Formula (Formula Type Payroll Run Proration) sth like this.
inputs are pay_value,
proration_start(date),
proration_end(date)
l_days = days_between(prorate_end,prorate_start) + 1
pay_value = pay_value * l_days / 31 /* instead of hardcoding 31 u can get the days_between period start and period end db items */
return pay_value.
3. Attach the above proration formula to the elements that you want to prorate ( element screen > proration tab)
Hope this helps.
Regards,
sharath

PF- Mid month employees

Hi all,
I am facing some issue in the provident fund for the Mid month joined employees. As per the client requirement, SAP is not calculating. I need your help in this.
For all the employees we are maintaining the IT 0587 has whichever is less.
I go through some of the threads, still now I am not able to put condition in the PCR.
Ex: Employee hired in the month of april 15.04.2014 his Basic salary is 10,000 rps. When I run the payroll basic salary is prorated with the amount 5333.33 for 16 days in the april month. But, PF should calculate based on the amount 5333.33 but in the output it is showing as 416.
Actually, PF should deduct 640 rps but it is showing 416 rps. 224 rps different amount is coming. How to resolve this one.
Regards,
Vijay Kumar

Hi,
When employee joins in the middle of the month The provident fund will prorate on Rs 6500 according to PF Act and standard rule that was defined in SAP as per act. You cannot change the rule that has defined in standard. The user exist cannot be the right solution for this. The user exist which are there it will not override the standard functionality. The best way is to go according to Act that was defined in SAP.
Incase if you want Rs 780 to be deducted for the first month for mid month joinee employees This can be done by manually inputting the data in additional payment wage type There are several ways to adjust the amount. You can either create a PF Adjustment wage type in additional payment for mid joinee employees to adjust the amount.

For the mid month new joiner the annual Conveyance exemption is coming incorrectly

Dear All,
For one of our client, we have have faced a uniqe issue.
If any employee join in the mid of the month, his prorated conveyance amount ( wage type 2020) is coming correctly. Suppose an employee joined at 16th of the month, system is calculating his conveyance for that month as INR 400 and which is correct.
However in his tax calculation for that particular month, system is taking INR 400*(rest of the month of the FY) in the wage type /4E3. which is incorrect. Suppose he joined in 16th April , system is calculating tax exemption 400*12=4800
Now if we run next month payroll , system is caculating the exemption properly. i.e. INR 400 + 800* rest of the month of the FY,
Please help
Regards
Tirtha

Hi Tirtha,
system is calculating perfectly.
first of all system check the no. of present days and accordingly it give the amount in the wage type /3C3 conveyance amount monthly and /3C4 will give Conveyance monthly exemption and it will multiply with no. of months to the fiscal year end and store in the wage type /4E3.
for example check for PF:
Every month PF amount store in WT /3F1 and send to /3F5 and this WT multiplied with No. of months and store the Annual amount in wt /3F6.
Regards,
Praneeth kumar

Asset Accounting - Mid month Convention

Hi,
I have a problem in Asset Accouting for configuring a mid-month convention (and mid-quarter), settings. I activated the use of half-month in my company code (value 15), and defined Calender assignment for my Fiscal year variant, for Period control 03. The depreciation start date is correctly calculated for the tax depreciation area (period control 03). But, for my book and group depreciation area (period control 01 - 1st of acquisition month), the system also calculating 15/mm.
For Book Depreciation area I need to calculate depreciation for the entire period in which Asset is acquired (period Control 01) Currently If I acuire the asset before 15th of month its calculating depreciation for entire month and If I acquire the asset after 15th of month its calculating only for half month.
Is there a way to have mid-month calculation only applying to specific depreciation area ? Did i miss something in the customizing or do I have to change the period control 01 to force the start date at the first of the current month ?
If you require any futher info to provide input on this issue, Please let me know.
Thanks in advance to everyone who could help me.

As long as the depreciation keys are different between the depreciation areas you should be able to have one calculating at mid-month and the other at full month, respectively.
Just a thought: Go into transaction "OAVH" and make sure that the periods are assigned correctly for your Period Control "1". It should have one line item with a "0" in the month and day field and the period field should be 'blank'.
If the Period Control is correct, you should try creating a custom Period Control that defines each period as the last day of the month.
Hope this helps,
Chad

Income tax issue for mid month joinees

Issue 2:
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month gross salary is calculated based on the earned salary amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax deducted based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Actual salary = 1,00,000 INR. Earned salary for 15 days = 50,000 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /416 Gross salary = 4,00,000 (50000*8). Based on this gross salary income tax calculated, But I want to calculated the gross at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
Gross salary : August month earned salary = 50,000 + Actual salary per month =1,00,000*7 =7,00,000.
Gross salary = 7,50,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V

Hi Param Dayal,
New issues rise Now....
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V
Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 26, 2011 2:52 PM

Mid-Month Calculations

I am bringing a fixed asset system online in SAP and during the legacy conversion it was realized that the test system is not calculating the depreciation using a mid month convention. That being said looking at the configuration the company code was setup in 2005 and is in production and is productive (since 2005). So it appears that this setting is global and SAP will not allow me to change these settings to allow mid month calculations. Is this correct? anyone ran across the same issue.

Hi
please read the note 2993 and 39416!
Best Regards,
Blaz

IT0007 Change Mid Month/Payroll error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for