ITUNES v7.0 Distortion when changing volume level

Anyone else having this issue?

i updated the s/w version to 7.1.1 and tried the speakers... they still did not work....i had itunes running when i plugged them in... as soon as i closed itunes and restarted it after i had plugged them in, the speakers and buttons worked fine....

Similar Messages

Changing volume level

I have a timeline with several speech segments in audio track 1.
I want to increase the volume level of each segment by +6dB.
When I select more than one segment at a time, the volume control disappear from the effects control panel.
Is there a way to increase the volume of all segments at a time?

Open the Audio Mixer and increase the level of the Master fader by 6 dB.
(Or the level of the Track 1 fader if you have more than one audio track)

Funny noise when changing volume

I've just noticed that when the volume is changed by pressing the volume keys at the top of the keyboard a small tapping noise comes from the speakers. I've checked the sound settings in the system preferences and I've turned off the play feedback feature when the volume is changed.
It's really beginning to bug me. This has only occurred after installing the latest update.
Has anyone else experienced the same problem?
Anna

So I took my 1.33Ghz iBook back to the Apple Store to have it replaced for this clicking/popping noise, volume balance problem that they are unable to fix or acknowledge as a bug. While I was waiting to be helped by the genius, I thought I would do a test with the iBooks and Powerbooks in the store.
Here are my startling findings....
ALL OF THE 12" IBOOKS AND POWERBOOKS IN THE STORE HAD THIS POPPING/CRACKLING SOUND.
Seems to be a bigger problem than even I had thought. I guess we will have to wait for a 10.4.4 update that hopefully will fix this problem.

ITunes sound crack / Pop when changing song

Hello
I'm having iTunes Crack / Pop everytime i change a song.
It doesn't occur with Windows Media player.
I'm using Windows 7 x64
Soundcard: ASUS XONAR D2X
anyone got idea on how to remove the crack / pop everytime i change song?

bump

Loss of sound effect when changing volume.

Hi there,
I have just purchased a Macbook Pro and everything was going well until I noticed that when I changed the volume using the F11 and F12 keys, the sound effect would no longer be produced. I have been through Sounds in System Preferences and checked all the settings are correct, even the 'play feedback when volume is changed' option is checked. All I have been doing so far is using iTunes and using the internet. I also loaded djay but I don't think this would have anything to do with it. Please help.

iCloud only keeps photo stream photos for 30 days, even though up to 1000 photos will remain on your devices until deleted. When you re-enabled photo stream you only received photo stream photos from the last 30 days as older photos are no longer in iCloud.
To change your iCloud ID, go to Settings>iCloud, tap Delete Account, then sign back in with the new ID. This deletes the account and your iCloud data from your device, but not from iCloud. Provided you are signing back into the same account, your iCloud data will reappear on your device when you sign back in.
However, to avoid losing photo stream photos, before deleting the account save them to your camera roll (if not already there). To do this, open your my photo stream album, tap Edit, tap the photos, tap Share, then tap Save to Camera Roll. Be sure to do this on your other devices first.
To get the missing photos back on your iPod, create a shared photo stream that includes them on one of your other devices and invite yourself as a subscriber (see http://help.apple.com/icloud/#mmc0cd7e99).

Workflow not triggering when changing Item-level Permissions in Sharepoint 2013 list

Scenario:
We have a custom list in Sharepoint 2013 that we use for Case Management. We have a workflow that triggers on a created item generated from an email. The user then gets a reply with a link to his own case.
I want the users only to be able to see their own cases and no one elses. When I change this under
Advanced Settings under List Settings and
Item-level Permissions and set them to Read items that were created by the user
and Create items and edit items that were created by the user
the workflow doesn´t trigger.
How can I resolve this? I've tried every possible out-of-the-box permissions but with no result. Help!
Thanks in advance!
// Browncreek

When you're testing , remember you cant trigger declarative workflow from the System Account - you need a general user account for auto-trigger workflows. Good luck!
Chris McNulty MCSE/MCTS/MSA/MVTSP | blog http://www.chrismcnulty.net/blog | twitter @cmcnulty2000 Microsoft Community Contributor Award 2011
Hi, I have the same problem. Except that I am not using an email to create a new item. The item is created by members of a SharePoint group that have Contribute access to the list. When use the same settings i.e.
Read items that were created by the user and Create items and edit items that were created by the user,
the workflow does not trigger. If I set it back to Real all items and Create
and Edit all items, it triggers the workflow.
Please help me resolve as I have rolled this out to pilot users and am having this trouble.
Thanks,
Vishal

Ram preview green line goes away when changing zoom level

I did a ram preview of my project, about 12 seconds long. Everything looks good until I want to zoom in or out on the comp, then the green line disappears and I have to render it over again. I don't remember AE doing this before. If I zoom to say 25% and render part of the comp, then zoom to 50%, that part with the green line is gone. I can render a different segment of the comp while in 50% and switch back to 25%, and the green line from when I rendered at 25% is back. I've turned off adaptive resolution in the fast preview options, and I turned off the disk cache. Is this a bug or just the way AE works now? I'm using CS6 version 11.0.2 on Win7.

Actually, I think I am. I didn't notice it before, but when I zoom in, if I have the resolution set to Auto, it changes between quarter, half and full depending on the zoom level. I've never noticed that before, or maybe they only recently made it so it didn't say Auto all the time, but now says what effective resolution it's set to. So is that the answer to my problem? Leave it on full resolution (or whatever I need at the time)?

ITunes 10.6 freezes when changing sync settings

Update to iTunes 10.6 on Windows 7 computer today. Now when I try to change my sync settings, and hit "apply" - iTunes freezes and the sync does not complete. I have already tried to factory reset the iPod Nano, and tried to totally uninstall and reinstall iTunes. Any other suggestions?

Uninstall/Reinstall did not work. Same issue with freezing as soon as it's launched.
Just to confirm, this is 10.6.3 64-bit Windows build.

Changing Volume Levels

1.) When raising or lowering the volume of an audio file, is there a way to know what -21 db is? Is this a fixed form of measurement, or is it based on the audio levels of the original file?
2.) Is there a way to visually see when noise is being introduced when the "Level" is raised in the Viewer?
3.) When wanting to raise volume, when is it better to raise the Levels, vs. Copying and pasting the track to increase the volume? Which situations work best for what?
Thanks!!!

1.) Are you asking about output level or gain level? By default, all FW captured audio comes into FCP with a gain level of 0db, regardless of it's output level. Gain level (the amount of adjustment from the default setting) can be seen in the Viewer window. Output level can be seen on the meters.
2.) Not unless you're really, really good a reading waveforms.
3.) Both methods achieve the same thing; raising the output level (volume). Of course, both methods also raise the noise floor. Duplicating the clip on the Timeline is much like assigning an analog mixer's channel to an additional bus.
You can also use the Dynamic Processor filter to raise the level beyond FCP's +12db gain limit.
-DH

Rumbling from output when changing volume.

I just recieved my iPod Classic from the mail yesterday. I bought a refurbished one to save some money but when I recieved it and uploaded all music/videos and applied the 2 yr warrenity on it that I found out it was rumbling the noice coming out of the head phones. But when it was too quite or maxed out it was fine. After a day of playing around with the settings I got it working normally but however it sometimes goes back to rumbling and will have to play with volume and reset the iPod before it goes back to normal. Is there anything I could do or is it something that I need to go to an apple store for? Also, if I do go to an Apple Store, will it be a quick fix or something that will take more than a day?

I have the EXACT SAME proublem. At first I thought my card went bad because I lost 3 channels but after hitting the defult button all the speakers started working again. For me it also seems that if I change the master volume on the soundblaster controll pannel to anything other then defult I then lose the same 3 channels. However if I use window's volume controll (single click on the speaker in the task tray), or the volume adjustment on my keyboard I have no proublems.

Feedback When Changing Volume Stopped Working

I have "Play feedback when volume is changed" checked in System Preferences > Sound > Sound Effects, but this has stopped working when I use the volume keys on my Apple keyboard. I would try trashing the appropriate preferences, but I can't find the right preferences file. Any help/suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Emily

I had to shut down my iMac because of a thunderstorm, and when I turned the computer back on, the feedback was working again.

No beeping when changing volume

When I turn the volume up and down the beep doesn't come on. What settings should I change?

System Preferences > Sound > Sound Effects -
Note - that pic is from Lion, but the one for Snow Leopard should be similar.

No sound from Sub, Rear L/R, Centre, when changing volume (X-Fi xtremegamer, 5.1 T61

Hey, since this week I got a really strange problem, I first noticed it when in games, i don't hear people coming from the back anymore, and music doesn't sound as crisp anymore. At first the rear right was switched around with the sub and some other strange stuff going on, and now it affects 4 speakers: the central speaker, the 2 rear speakers, and the subwoofer. When i click on standard configuration(dunno how it is exactly in english, cus i have the?dutch version, but it changes everything into default), they work again. I started customizing everything again, and tested if they were working, but same problem: only front left/right were working. After some testing I found out that it occurs as soon as i change the volume with the main volume knob. By default it is something like 74%, and after changing it to something else, the problem occurs, even if turned back to 74.
Does someone know how to fix it's

I have the EXACT SAME proublem. At first I thought my card went bad because I lost 3 channels but after hitting the defult button all the speakers started working again. For me it also seems that if I change the master volume on the soundblaster controll pannel to anything other then defult I then lose the same 3 channels. However if I use window's volume controll (single click on the speaker in the task tray), or the volume adjustment on my keyboard I have no proublems.

Effect on symbolic link when changing volume name

I just wanted to verify this information before I proceed with changing the name of my hard drive. I have 3 partitions of my MBP's internal drive. There is the system partition "Mac HD", a boot camp partition and a data only partition called "Storage". I have quite a few symbolic links on "Mac HD" which point to "Storage", where the data is stored. If I change the name of "Mac HD" and/or "Storage", will the symbolic links update to the new name of the volume automatically? Or, will the change of volume name break the symbolic links so I have to create them all over again? Everything I have read leads me to believe they will update, but I don't want to mess anything up and find out the hard way. A little confirmation would make me feel much better before I make the change.
Thanks,
sterling

etresoft wrote:
I don't want to get off on a tangent about pros and cons of cloning, I just want to plant a seed of worry to review it at a later date. It is one thing to restore a disk image for a kiosk machine, it is something else entirely to restore an image of some machine that has had people using it. Misconfiguration, corrupt filesystems, and failed hard drives are some of the most frequent causes of failures. Having a clone of a system that has just failed for one of those reasons doesn't give me a warm fuzzy. It would be a much better idea to have a procedure (or script) to build a new server from scratch and load it from a backup (not a bitwise clone) of known, good data.
Our computer use is typical. There are only a few employees who use the computers regularly, and a few people others who use it less often. the daily use is mostly for back end management like bookkeeping and processing orders. The rest of the operations are design based, like graphics and documents. We don't have a business like a kiosk where people are all over the computers all day. With deep freeze on the system though, there is no worry about anyone doing anything to the system that would corrupt it. Also, the actual drives with the OS rarely get changed or backed up, because they remain the same for the most part. All of the files that are created like documents, designs, orders and such, are saved to storage. The storage is what I back up frequently, because that's where everything is stored. I may have a false sense of security, but I always thought I was more protected than most, because all of my files are stored on a drive without any operating system. I figured there is very little that can go wrong which could corrupt my data since the drive is data only. I always have 2 backups up both the OS drive and the data storage drive. One is like a daily backup, the other is more like once a week or so update which is kept in the safe. I always verify that the backup by opening a few files on it, but I never really know for sure that everything is safe because I can't open everything! I have no clue how to start a server based system backup like you are talking about, but it sounds like a much safer backup method. A little overkill for use considering we don't do that much on the computers? Maybe, but only because I would have to hire someone to come set it up for me. Maybe it's not so hard as it sounds, but I know I don't have the time to learn how to do something like that myself. I didn't realize the backup techniques I am using are so inferior. I feel like my data is pretty safe, but I guess I can look into other options.
I don't consider it "fun", I consider it a "requirement".
I am a bit of a prepper, okay a lot of a prepper. I am prepared for just about anything that can come my way. I do not consider testing my preps fun either. I was just saying, I anticipate that there will be some sort of loss when I restore, based on what you're telling me.
Disasters do have a remarkable ability to strike when you are least prepared. There is a logical reason for that. The more prepared you are, the less disastrous the event.
Agreed, 100%. That's why we're talking about it. I was starting to think that I was over thinking it! Clearly I'm not the only one!
Interesting. Unfortunately, the symbolic link method is pretty invasive because it requires those links to be up and functioning before the clone. A better solution would be to identify all those files, and have a launchd script that replaces the original files with either modified versions or links at system boot time.
With deep freeze, the symlinks are re-created every time I boot, even if they are broken before shutdown. So, it's pretty safe as long as they work before I freeze the system. I also have the two backups in case something goes wrong. I'm confident the links work. And the worst thing that can go wrong if they break is that I have to re-create the broken ones. either way, the data that is linked is still on my storage drive and both of my backups. The only thing I wouldn't be able to recover would be the symbolic link itself.
You need to think of this in terms of the file system. The "name" of a volume doesn't really mean anything. What matters is the mount point. The mount point, however, depends on a particular hardware configuration. You could control it better with some clever mounting scripts, but it sure seems like there is a much easier way to accomplish your ultimate goal.
I guess you're saying I could get by without deep freeze, and that it complicated things. Yes, it does. I am always trying to find workarounds because of it. However, I like the fact that my computer is the same every time I turn it on no matter what someone has done to it.
You have extensive control over your mount points.
I will have to look into this, because if I can get the firewire clone to run with the symlinks in place, I could have a fully working system with nothing more than a restart of the computer.
That, I don't know. Restoring a disk image that has embedded symbolic links to another drive is a fragile solution. You know what files you need to symlink, write a script that will set up the links at boot time - or at any time. Exactly what files are these? I strongly think there is an even easier solution lurking around. Why are you so concerned about retaining user data through restarts? Why are you even restarting?
There's actually not as many as I thought. I have symlinked data and prefs from mail, ical, address book, blackberry desktop. Then, some document folders. I could cut a lot of these down by linking my entire documents folder and building my hierarchy within that, but I've built my own which is neatly organized into the 4 departments of our business. It's really not that much. The only thing is that my mail, ical and address book won't work on the clone, because they are dependent on the simlinks. Everything else is just files that I would access directly from the storage drive anyway, so no loss there!
Wow! I made it through here! I'll review over the ideas you recommended and see if I can actually implement any of them myself. My guess is, I don't have the skills to pull them off. I'll look into it though. thanks for your time, and I will let you know what happens.

[SOLVED] pulseaudio visual feedback when changing volume

I'm using pasystray and have the volume rocker on my thinkpad bound to increase and decrease the volume using xbindkeys. Its working, but I would really like some visual feedback and when I increase and decrease the volume. Is there something out there that already does this? Something that looks kinda like the screen brightness popup that shows up in xfce4 would be nice.
Last edited by syamajala (2013-02-02 18:07:59)

i was searching for the wrong thing before. what i wanted was osd volume display. this script worked for me, https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 1#p1004571

ITUNES v7.0 Distortion when changing volume level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for