IWeb - does it still work?

Every time I open iWeb it comes up with the error message (which is sent to apple) and asks if I want to reopen. I re open & get the same message.
Does it still work? I haven't used it for ages...
If not then how do I find the pics & videos that are embedded in iWeb?

To open your domain file in Lion, Mountain Lion or Mavericks or to switch between multiple domain files Cyclosaurus has provided us with the following script that you can make into an Applescript application with Script Editor. Open Script Editor, copy and paste the script below into Script Editor's window and save as an application.
do shell script"/usr/bin/defaults write com.apple.iWeb iWebDefaultsDocumentPath -boolean no"
delay 1
tell application "iWeb" to activate
You can download an already compiled version with this link: iWeb Switch Domain.
Just launch the application, find and select the domain file in your Home/Library/Application Support/iWeb folder that you want to open and it will open with iWeb. It modifies the iWeb preference file each time it's launched so one can switch between domain files.
WARNING: iWeb Switch Domain will overwrite an existing Domain.sites2 file if you select to create a new domain in the same folder. So rename your domain files once they've been created to something other than the default name.
For Mavericks, 10.9 , go to your Home folder and use the View ➙ Show View Options menu to bring the this window:
If using the iWeb Switch Domainapp doesn't let you open your domain file try the following:
1 - delete the iWeb preference file, com.apple.iWeb.plist, that resides in your
User/Home/Library/ Preferences folder.
2 - delete iWeb's cache file, Cache.db, that is located in your
User/Home/Library/Caches/com.apple.iWeb folder (Snow Leopard and Earlier).
3 - launch iWeb and try again.

Similar Messages

ITunes, Remote.app v2: Does v2 still work in iOS7 or will I be automatically updated to version 3? (Plus v3 and iTunes issues)

Remote.app (version 2): Does it still work in iOS7 or will I be automatically updated to version 3?
That is basically the main question I've come to ask (with some side commentary in parenthesis below).
After trying out iTunes Remote App version 3, I saw that it scrambles playlists (such as Recently Purchased), which makes my playlists worthless. For example, using Remote.app, it's no longer possible to simply play the songs you bought over the last week at the iTunes Store using the Recenlhy Purchased Playlist. Since I buy a lot of music through the iTunes Store, I naturally want to listen to what I just paid for, just as I could using Remote.app version 2.
But it's not just the Recenly Purchased playlist, it's all my playlists. Through the last decade, day in and day out, I've carefully orgnized hundreds of playlists that I've very crafted, song by song like old mix tape casettes.
They payoff for this work has been enormous. Since starting with mp2 in 1995, then mp3 and continuing through to the thousands of dollars I've spent purchasing songs through the iTunes Store and tens of thousands on iPods, iPhones, iPads, and computers—I've been able to make music match whatever mood or music was juuust right for the moment, making for great moments and memories with friends and families. For some artists, I always want to hear their latest songs first or I want to to hear top rates songs first. Other lists are about creating a particular mood for just about any occasion. I can even shift the mood in the room with the right music list. It's really been fantastic the memories and moments I've been able to set the tone with the right song, and most of this has been not the song itself, but the flow of music I've created by orgnizing music lists. That's a lot of work I've invested. So the order of the songs matters a lot to me, especially the very first song that starts that list. That's the song I want to hear first, not somewhere in the middle.
As of Remote.app version 3, these carefully crafted songlists are scrambled, making the App worthless. When I first noticed this I couldn't believe it, must be a bug. Nope, no bug, by design I found out. It's like when Lucy pulls the football away. It's mean spirited to take back features you've sold and promoted and people have grown to rely on in the workflow of their lives. So I downgraded back to Remote.app version 2.
((Actually, they're not really technically scrambled, they're actually presented in alphabertical order, which I think is really the same thing to me. Think about it: listening to an artists work alphabetically by title is really the most random and completely scrambled way to listen to their music. Or if you don't want to listen to them alphabetically, you can have them shuffled. Those are now the only two choices. Either way, the lists are jumbled, and like iTunes 11, several of the most powerful features have been taken away. In this case the exact thing that's missing is that the iTunes Remote no longer reflects the sort order of iTunes playlists.
I don't know if this is a quiet, update-by-update shift away from our playlists and towards iTunes Radio or not, but I would think so. Why else would you make it less powerful. To quote Merlin Mann Apple tends to "fire a warning shot" feature wise before taking something away. The Finder has gotten less and less powerful in finding files and folders by their name and size through the last decade.
I'm now noticing the same thing with iTunes, it's becoming more difficult to find the currently playing song. In iTunes 10, Go to Current Song would open the folder containing the list of the currently playing song, highlight and move that list to the top of the left column and then highlight that song. In iTunes 11, Go to Current Song will only highlight the folder that contains that song and nothing more. At that point you're on your own to hunt town the currently playing song. This feature has been broken—on purpose I suspect.))
SO—I don't want to be forced into Remote.app version 3 and have my playlists scrambled on my iPhone and iPad. Is there anyone who knows the answer from first hand experience?
If customer loyalty is as important to Apple as it should be taking away features in iTunes and Remote app will only drive old customers away.
Thanks!!
David

I like that I would be able to maintain my iPhoto library data for Faces and Places in Aperture, but am concerned that when the iPhoto library is "upgraded" for Aperture, and I decide I don't really need that program, the upgraded library won't work with iPhoto anymore.
The iPhoto library isn't changed in any way by Aperture. Aperture will import the Library and you can choose to copy the files to the Aperture Library or reference them within iPhoto. As long as you don't delete files from the iPhoto Library via Aperture (which you could do if you choose to Reference) there is no impact on iPhoto
Will I still be able to use iPhoto to access and organize my library, or will it be forever converted for use with Aperture?
They are completely different libraries.
Recently, iPhoto bugs make Events show up multiple times in iTunes when syncing for iPhone and iPad.
Fixed in the 9.1.3 update.
Will I find a better user experience with Aperture, or does it also use the single file library and suffer the same struggles iPhoto users have been seeing lately?
Like iphoto, Aperture can use the "single file library" or it can use a Referenced Library (just like iphoto can). Note that using a Referenced Library offers not a whit more in terms of features or capabilities. It's file storage plain and simple. Nothing more.
No you won't see the "same struggles iPhoto users have been seeing..." because Aperture is an entirely different allication.
But you my see Aperture or Lightroom struggles
Regards
TD

I dropped my iphone 3gs in water and grabbed it immediately out. It gave me a charger is not supported with device screen every minute or two. I powered it off for the night. I havent experienced problems since. Why does it still work?

I dropped my iphone 3gs in water and grabbed it immediately out. It gave me a charger not supported sign every minute or two. I decided to turn it off for the night and the next morning it worked fine and only the bottom sensor was triggered. Why does it still work and how long will it last?

Water in itself will not kill electronic components if you let it dry out. Your first reaction to turn it off was a good one but you could have waited even longer.
It also depends what's on your water that will stay after the water itself had dried; like salt. Anything that iseither acid or conductor left on the circuit board will reduce the life of the board. Given said this, no one could state how long your iPhone will work since no one will know for sure where the water had time to infiltrate before you removed your device and no one what's may left there.
Consider yourself lucky. I don't understand however what you mean by a sensor triggered.

Does FaceTime still work when you're browsing the Internet simultaneously

Does FaceTime still work when you're browsing the Internet simultaneously on your phone?

triptifromsan francisco wrote:
Does FaceTime still work when you're browsing the Internet simultaneously on your phone?
iOS: Using FaceTime - Apple Support
in my experience with facetime, you can't browse other apps or features while on a facetime video call.

Callibrating Battery after the 1st week you use it, does it still work?

Does callibrating your macbook pro battery after the fist week ou use it still work? ( about after you have it for around a month)

Hi g5g4g3,
According to some Apple fact sheets, it is never too late to calibrate your battery.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.4/en/mh2339.html
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/9036.html
PB

Does shake still work with OS X Yosemite?

I still use Shake extensively in my workflows. Does anyone know yet whether it will still work with Yosemite? If now what kinds for work around might there be?
All I have seen on it so far is this thread: no Shake 4 and Motion 4 support in Yosemite which feels inconclusive ATM.

Unfortunately, it most definitely does not. It gets moved to "/Incompatible Software", acquires a prohibitory symbol over the icon, and the Finder won't let you launch it. Attempting to start it from the command line results in a crash with an "Assertion failed" message. If there's a workaround for this, I haven't found it yet.
If you need Shake, don't upgrade to Yosemite. Sorry.

Does iCloud still work if you are signed out

Does iCloud still store information and link to other devices if you are signed out?

see
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH2610 and yes once you have enabled them
http://www.apple.com/uk/icloud/setup/mac.html

Apple Mail specific domain domain \ username does this still work for Mavericks?

THIS DISCUSSION IS ARCHIVED
Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?
10212 Views 8 Replies Latest reply: Aug 18, 2010 2:37 PM by jruano
Level 1 (10 points)
mike_donahue
Jun 2, 2010 4:46 PM
Our company is running Exchange 2007, OWA enabled, EWS is setup, Auto discovery is enable. The only thing I haven't got an answer on is whether Service Pack 4 has been installed. The server is set up with a domain specified but I don't know where to include that in the Mail Account Setup. Mail seems to be locating the server fine but it says username or password can not be verified. I can only assume that it's because I haven't included the domain correctly.
iPad (and I assume iPhone/iTouch) have a field in their setup to include the domain and a coworker is connecting fine with to the company server. Where is it in Mail? I have tried to prepend it to my username (domain/username) but it hasn't worked. I can't recall all the variations I have tried of this, but unless I have the domain first in the username field, Mail won't even connect to the server. I've been all over these boards and dozens more and I can't find any answers to this problem.
Any here have any ideas? Thanks,
Mike D
MacBook Pro, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Mac OS X (10.6.3), 4 gig RAM
I have this question too (0)
Categories: Mail and Address bookTags: mail_address_book_macosx_v10.6, mac_os_x_v.10.6
Level 7 (22,080 points)
Matthew Morgan Los Angeles, CA
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 2, 2010 5:48 PM (in response to mike_donahue)
Here's an article that may help.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3748
MattDual 1.8 GHz G5 2.5 GB RAM/MBP 2.26GHz 2GB RAM/iPod nano 4g/iPhone 3GS, Mac OS X (10.6.2), ATI Radeon 9600, Time Capsule, AirPort Express
Like (0)
Level 1 (10 points)
mike_donahue
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 2, 2010 9:01 PM (in response to Matthew Morgan)
I already read that one and it fails to address the domain question, but thank you for the suggestion.
MikeMac OS X (10.6.3)
Like (0)
Level 1 (10 points)
mike_donahue
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 6, 2010 5:07 PM (in response to mike_donahue)
Bump.
I still haven't found an answer to this. Anyone else have any ideas. Still waiting to hear back from out IT guys about the service pack issues.
Is there any way to attach a screen grab to a post? Thought it might help paint the picture in case I haven't stated it clearly.
Again, thanks in advance for any help with this.
MikeMacBook Pro, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Mac OS X (10.5.1), 4 gig RAM
Like (0)
Level 1 (0 points)
tf99
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 22, 2010 1:00 PM (in response to mike_donahue)
Hi. I'm having precisely the same problem. My Exchange account works like a charm on my iPhone, but all permutations of the same settings simply don't work in OS X Mail (v. 4.3).
Has anyone out there set up an Exchange account with a domain? Can you tell us where you put it to get the account to work?
Thanks!2.0 GHz MacBook, Mac OS X (10.6.4)
Like (0)
Level 4 (2,535 points)
Asatoran
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 22, 2010 1:16 PM (in response to mike_donahue)
Enter your username as:
<domain>\<username>
This is standard practice for Microsoft if there's no place to enter the domain name.
(Note the backslash, not the forward slash. Backslash is NOT the one under the question mark on a U.S.A. English keyboard.)MBP 15" Penryn, Mini 2009, Mac OS X (10.6.2)
Like (0)
Level 1 (0 points)
tf99
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 22, 2010 1:42 PM (in response to Asatoran)
Thanks Asatoran. That turned out to be part of the solution for me. The other part was changing the port I used for the SSL connection -- it was set wrong at some point, either because the default was wrong, or because I forgot I had changed it in troubleshooting before trying the slash the way you suggest. Anyway, the port number for some reason doesn't show up on my iPhone settings, so it didn't occur to me to tweak it.2.0 GHz MacBook, Mac OS X (10.6.4), 4GB RAM
Like (0)
Level 1 (0 points)
frieiv
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Jun 25, 2010 12:06 PM (in response to tf99)
Hi!
Could you please state the port numer you changed from and to?
I´m having the same problem and still can´t access the exchange server outside the company network.
But it seems like Mail 4.3 tryes to use the internal server and never the external? Any tips on this?MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.6.4)
Like (0)
Level 1 (0 points)
jruano
Re: Where do I include Exchange domain in Mail setup?Aug 18, 2010 2:37 PM (in response to mike_donahue)
<domain>\<username> worked for me... FINALLY!!
Thanks muchMacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.6.4), iMac

Quit your mail entirely, then in terminal do:
mv ~/Library/Mail/V2/MailData/Envelope* ~/Desktop
This moves all your "Envelope Index*" files to your desktop. An alternative is deleting the files, but this allows you to keep them as a temporary back-up (you can delete them at-will later). Also, you can move the files from Finder instead of Terminal, if you prefer.
After the files have been moved, re-open Mail
This should re-load all your email messages, updating/restoring the count
While this works, it does not explain the reason the count goes missing, nor does it ensure that the count won't go missing again in the future, but at least it's a temporary workaround.

IDVD ...does it still work?

I have a new MacBook Pro running mountain lion which of course does not include iDVD. I called Apple and spoke to two people on the chance that they might send me a copy if I begged, as some have reported worked for them. No luck, they say they don't have it anymore.
So, plan B. I was going to buy it on Amazon. Three questions:
Will it still run on my MacBook with the latest iMovie version? Will I need to export the movie first?
Also, since I would be buying a copy of iLife11, can I only install iDVD and not the entire suite? Is this simple to do?
Finally, will iDVD burn to blu-ray?
Thanks!!

IDVD remains very popular in the Macintosh community.
Mountain Lion is tested for compatibility with iDVD. IT WORKS FINE.
IDVD is a wonderful piece of software and well worth the low cost of $40.
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MC623Z-A-iLife-VERSION/dp/B003XKRZES/ref=sr_1_1?ie=U
http://dealmac.com/lw/artclick.html?1,527850,1872219
Finally, will iDVD burn to blu-ray?
Sorry no.

Does MacMini still work as a media computer or HTPC?

I was wanting to buy a second ATV2 but have always wanted the extra functionality of a MacMini. Principally, I'd like to be able to record TV.
I've just dscovered that Frontrow has gone in Lion and iTunes 10.4.
Does this mean I can no longer think of using a MacMini instead of an ATV2? I've tried controlling iTunes from my iPad / iPhone and although it controls OK it's very much a standard itunes interface on the screen.
Thanks

Sahara C wrote:
I was wanting to buy a second ATV2 but have always wanted the extra functionality of a MacMini. Principally, I'd like to be able to record TV.
I've just dscovered that Frontrow has gone in Lion and iTunes 10.4.
Does this mean I can no longer think of using a MacMini instead of an ATV2? I've tried controlling iTunes from my iPad / iPhone and although it controls OK it's very much a standard itunes interface on the screen.
There is an unofficialy way to get Frontrow working under Lion but it is currently not compatible with iTunes 10.4 (only older versions). Most people have given up on Frontrow due to Apple having neglected it for years. The two main replacements people look at are either Plex or XBMC (both for Mac).
While it is not perfect Microsoft Media Center is almost the only example of a Microsoft software product that -
Microsoft has developed themselves,
and is the best in class

ACGI Dispatcher - Does it still work?

I just downloaded the 30-day trial of acgidispatcher. Judging from the website documentation, it looks like a product that might do just what I need.
However, I'm having a little trouble getting it going. I think I've installed it right, but I get the error message...
acgi services temporary unavailable.
...when I point my browser at what I believe to be a properly compiled Applescript CGI application in the correct folder.
I tried to use James Sentman's support site, but the only URL I can find for it...
http://www.sentman.com/support/
...is getting a 404. I also sent an email that hasn't been answered.
I'm beginning to wonder if maybe this product broke and there's no one to fix it.
Is there anyone else using this product with 10.4.9?
--Gil
12 inch PB G4 w/20 inch Flat Plane Array Mac OS X (10.4.9)

You asked...
The script has to be compiled as a "Stay-Open" application", which means that once it's launched it never quits. The same condition applied in OS9, so it wasn't too hard to figure out. A mention in the documentation would have been nice.
Applescript modules (called scripts) are not plain text files, but must be created by a special editor ("Script Editor.app" is one.) When the file is Saved, options allow the file to be saved as an application. This one file then functions as an application but also contains both source and object. When you launch the file, the application runs. If instead you opened the same file with the editor, you could edit the source and Save again.
Scripts typically are coded in a single file with a program at the top followed by all its subroutines. The top program is called the "run" handler because it is run whenever the application is launched.
Subroutines are called "handlers" because they can be accessed externally, from other scripts, even other processes. There is syntax to call a handler as a subroutine from the run handler or any other handler in the script. There is also syntax to call a handler defined in another application:
tell application "foo" to dowhatwith given params
You can even make the top-level program in another application run again:
tell application "foo" to run
The name of the handler and the syntax for its parameters would be defined in the other script:
source in file "foo":
<... run handler code here>
on dowhatwith given params
<..."dowhatwith" handler code goes here>
end dowhatwith
For these sample acgi applications, the run handler is null: when you launch them they do nothing. However, they all have (at least) one handler named "handle CGI request".
on handle CGI request
<...>
end handle CGI request
This is the entry point for Apache or MacHTTP or WebStar or whatever http server is calling the AppleScript cgi.
Apache will first launch the application then call the "handle CGI request" handler. Problem is, the application will finish its run handler and quit almost instantly, so then there's no process to handle the "handle CGI request".
The solution is to make the AppleScript "stay-open" when saved, so that once launched it never quits. And there they are in my dock right now, still running after my tests yesterday. I can quit them manually.
I like to code my cgi scripts so that they do quit by themselves after a few minutes with no work. This is assisted by a special "idle" handler which, if present in the script, MacOS will call with no parameters every now and then.
So I'm off and running on this path for now, to see where it leads.
Thank you very much, Anthony, for your help and encouragement, and especially for your review of some very attractive alternatives.
--Gil
12 inch PB G4 w/20 inch Flat Plane Array Mac OS X (10.4.9)

IWeb - does it REALLY work. Here's my deal...

I used a site builder at Network solutions / printadvisor.com is my domain. Nothing really fancy - just art / pics / links... my SMALL BUS card site. Anyways... the page doesn't view correctly. Their template problem... they don't intend to fix it. So I have to do something as I refuse to pay them another dime.
I been messing around in iweb '08... and I could rebuild my site using it to look half decent ( I know how to get around in pretty well with the interface etc.)
MY QUESTIONS - is it really wysiwyg. Really? No code writing needed, AND will view properly across browsers?
I'll need some ftp storage for clients to upload graphics files / and printers to retrieve.
And email forwarding to an address to get my mail.
I have a guy willing to build me a site possibly using a wordpress template. I'm also bidding out to designers to build me a site. All of this will likely cost way more than I'd like to budget right now... plus I'd like to have the ability to add / or make changes once it's built.
iWeb looks pretty cool now that I've been poking around... and should get a .mac account so my kids could do stuff... BUT IS IT REALLY USEABLE / APPROPRIATE FOR A BUS SITE (low traffic)
Any comments appreciated.
Thank you,
David Stamm

David Stamm wrote:
BUT IS IT REALLY USEABLE / APPROPRIATE FOR A BUS SITE (low traffic)
David ~ Since you're building a business site, you may want to consider SEO (Search Engine Optimization) before using iWeb: +"iWeb websites are not made to be search engine friendly"+ — read more here:
_SEO For iWeb: How to get your iWeb Websites into Google & Other Major Search Engines_
...iWeb is designed for personal sites and, as such, Apple apparently thinks there's no need for Google — you tell granny the URL of your personal site, she painstakingly types it in and then gazes admiringly at the photos of her grandchildren.
Apple hasn't changed this approach in three iterations of iWeb but perhaps, with all the feedback it receives on this issue, there's still hope. Meanwhile, web-design apps for business sites tend to integrate search engine optimization — Sandvox Pro is an example:
http://www.karelia.com/sandvox/getyour_site_noticed_andb.html

Does LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT still work for you?

Those of you who have AIGLX-capable video hardware: can you still force accelerated indirect rendering for OpenGL stuff, using LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1, without X freezing solid? Or does LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT cause a lockup?

Hmm, so this might be a little late to ask but I never really understood what actually happens when the driver detects AIGLX capable hardware and displays somehting like this in Xorg.0.log:
(II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
(II) GLX: Initialized DRI GL provider for screen 0
Does it use AIGLX or the regular DRI preferably? What about these btw:
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 8, (OK)
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:00:10.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 8, (OK)
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 8
drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:00:10.0
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x24
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x25
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x26
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x27
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x28
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x29
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2a
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2b
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2c
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2d
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2e
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2f
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x30
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x31
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x32
(II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
(II) GLX: Initialized DRI GL provider for screen 0
(**) Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
(**) Mouse1: Device: "/dev/input/mice"
(**) Mouse1: Protocol: "IMPS/2"
(**) Option "CorePointer"
(**) Mouse1: Core Pointer
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Sorry, also want to ask someone before I go diggin in myself once.
Most importantly, yes LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1does still affects the Xserver. It is switching to indirect rendering as glxinfo suggests while most OpenGL apps such as neverball run just fine still. Sorry, didn't try beryl or anything heh. This is on a mac though using archppc, similar setup what goes for versions though.

Illustrator 9 - does it still work?

My illustrator 9 program 'stopped working' on my laptop - and doesn't work after installatino on a new computer - is it permanently defunct? I can't even open all my old and valuable drawings. Thanks for any insight.

Hello artforward,
Win 7 might be too advance operating system for Ai 9 as it was launched in 2000 and it is possible that it might not work. But, as you said it worked for 1 day and didn't the next then there might be following reasons for that:
1. Your OS got upgraded the 2nd day and installed some updates which are causing compatibility issues with AI9 and need to uninstalled. Still recommendation from Windows would be is to keep your OS updated to keep it safe and secure..
2. You can also try choosing to restore your OS to a previous date on which it was working fine and see if it starts to launch.
If it starts to work using above methods then it is really very good but otherwise we suggest you to please upgrade to a higher version so that you do not encounter any such compatibility issues with the OS.
Regards,
Dhirendra Mohan

Does Winclone still work to restore a Boot Camp partition?

I have a 50GB Boot Camp partition, NTFS file system, with Windows XP. My computer is a Mac Pro running OS X 10.6.5. I have been using Winclone to clone the Boot Camp partition as a backup. I know that Winclone is no longer supported, and have heard that Winclone may not work properly with Snow Leopard.
I have no problem creating an image of the Boot Camp partition using Winclone. I have not yet had to do a restore to a new partition, but assume that some day I may need to do so.
My question is: Has anyone running Snow Leopard successfully used Winclone to restore a Boot Camp partition?
A secondary question: Is there any other utility, running on the Mac side, that will clone/restore a Boot Camp partition?

coruscate wrote:
I have the Winclone backup, but I am unclear how to restore it.
Using Winclone, I can select the Image to restore.
When I click on Mount, Winclone puts a disk image of the partition on the desktop.
When I select the desired partition in Destination and click Restore, it tells me "No Windows Partition Found."
Has anyone done this? Can you give me any advice about how to complete the restore?
Good luck to you. I am trying to transfer/migrate my Bootcamp partition (XP pro, FAT32) to a larger HD. I tried Winclone, and like you could create an image, but am unable to restore it on the new drive. I get the same error that you do. I tried creating a Bootcamp partition, rather than having Winclone do it, but would get this error in the log:
Source image volume size is not an exact multiple of 1 MiB
This happened whether I used Bootcamp Assistant or Disk Utility to create the partition, and it didn't matter whether I used a larger partition size or attempted to match the existing one. Apparently Winclone measures the block-sizes differently than Finder, Terminal, or any other measurement that I have used reports.
I've read about suggestions to turn my old FAT-32 Bootcamp Parition into an NFTS one, but I'm loathe to do that since I have on idea if that will work.

IWeb - does it still work?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for