IWEB Features you would like to see added

Hi I have posted this here to see what users would like from iweb. I hope to compile the list and send it as a suggestion to Apple. It would be good to have one central location for all requests.
I don't know if iweb can support some of these requests but here goes.
Simple Google/search engine listing feature for all iweb sites
Simple site backup to a folder or location/hard drive etc
Easy Transfer, One cilck transfer of site for editing on another computer
Ability to change the text size and font of the home pages and menu bar.
A flash player that takes photos video with an on/off mute function, scalable with the ability to adjust the time each photo is displayed.
A magnification too that allows photos to be enlarged once the cursor hovers over them/scalable in size
A set of flash wipes and transitions for introducing your text/videos.
A paypal shopping cart system, doesn't have to be a full web shop just the facility to sell a few items via our site.
Ability to host a few sites say 4 max. I have a personal site and a small business site and would like to host both ( Maybe I can do this ! I am still discovering things about iweb)
A rapid loading function that you can drop you site into and it will format for quickest loading.
Maybe allow different compression settings like in Final Cut for different types of content.
(don't know if you can do this but it would be great)
A contact page that is linked to my mobile me account as well as my site, this allows me have the one location or a second to forward my mail to.
Ok Thats all I can think of at the moment, I'm sure their are a ton more suggestions out there.
Regards

Here are a few more items for your wish list:
1. ability to import a published site.
2. a full fledged eCommerce / PayPal capability is a must.
3. ability to edit a template and save changes to the template, or create your own.
4. ability to import templates from other iLife or iWork programs such as Keynote and Pages

Similar Messages

What happened to this thread? -- LabVIEW poll "Features you would like to see in LabVIEW!"

What happened to this thread? --> LabVIEW poll "Features you would like to see in LabVIEW!"

Warren Massey -
Unfortunately, we were not able to migrate the polls and topics to the new system when we launched. The good news is that we still have access to the data and are investigating our migration options available.
We will also focus on getting some new topics and polls out to the community in the next few weeks.
Thanks!
Molly K.
Web Support & Operations Manager
National Instruments

Your Favorite FreeHand Features You Would Like To See In Illustrator

I am really curious to hear about the favorite features that Freehand users think would be important additions to Illustrator.
I would also be interested in hearing why you think this feature is better than the way Illustrator handles the same task, unless you the feature just doesn't exist in Illustrator.

Just found your question, Wade. Many thanks for asking since it is very encouraging to know that Adobe is aware of Freehand (FH) users' frustrations, beyond the usual learning curve challenge. Many CS3 Illustrator (AI) features are terrific and not available in FH, but the frustration of seeing FH's many intuitive options disappear from our desk top is difficult. I'd hardily amen the words of Ken Nielsen: ... 'incorporate EVERY feature possible from Freehand.' I am quickly improving my ability to exploit AI's advantages but still get frustrated that many of FH options are not available in AI. Here are a few and will try to add others later:
PAGE SIZE TOOL: I cannot change the page size with FH's page tool. To get a page size to fit new art work I have to guess and run the risk of something not being open and not adjusting if I move my work. This is important to keep the white border from appearing in exports, although I have found that making a Clipping Path can solve this. Why not have the FH option, however, of diagonally dragging the corner of the page and fit it the size of the page to the art work?
PEN TOOL DRAWING: The pen tool does not have an option that automatically makes beautifully curved lines (which always and exactly fit the complex map borders I draw), and simply by holding down Option in FH while clicking the pen tool (dragging out in AI is nice sometimes, but I had to buy a Big Wacom tablet to do what FH does naturally).
OPEN/CLOSED PATH: I always knew in FH if my path was 'closed' or 'open.' I know fill does not depend upon this in AI but in my work to know this is very important.
SWATCH BOX: In AI I have to remember the short cut or travel around my 30" screen to change between stroke and fill. In FH it was right in the color palette where it should be. As in the case of layers below, my choice of viewing swatches (small list) does not stick and I have to choose again every time I reopen AI. Have you thought of layers for swatches for those of us who have many?
GRAPHIC STYLES: I thought AI had a 'Redefine' option in the Graphic Style but can't find it. Since AI does not allow the editing of a graphic style in the Style palette, I have to make a new style and toss the old one. FH has both of the possibilities (redefine and editing).
PASTE INSIDE/CUT CONTENTS: Paste Inside, etc. was great in FH. I understand how it works in AI but to have the old FH option, and edit inside (hold down Option) were so easy.
LAYERS: AI's great layer/sub layer/sub layer organization is especially exciting for me since my 300-400 layers in FH can be nicely 'compacted.' This has vast potential and already I cannot live without it. However, you should demonstrate how good it is to new users rather than simply imply 'you'll get used to it.' I have tons of docs with tons of layers (maps and charts).
COMPRESS ALL SUBLAYERS NEEDED: I have my layers collapsed so that my palette is very easy to use, *but* when I close the doc and bring it up again they are all open again and I have to go through and close them. Make them 'stick' so they open the way we close them, and 2) put in a way to deal with sub layers so that we can make all of a certain set of sub layers visible/invisible or locked/unlocked without affecting other layers. Yes, I can drag my mouse down the list, but when I have 600 map city names in their individual sub layers that is a bit much.
A BIT OF TROUBLESHOOTING: A graphic style fill would not change (disappear) although fill color was nothing. I even use 'Break Link to Graphic Style' and tried again. Something is wrong since the stroke changes color if I choose it manually or via a style, but the fill remains the same (one of my styles = 50% red) although I change it many all or via the Graphic Style palette. Thus it appears the the fill is stuck in one mode, or rather two since it will change color or change to gradient, but it will not disappear and always default to the 50% red. I tried quitting the program and bringing it up again, and also rebooting. No change. Finally, after long hours I tried putting the graphic on a new layer and it was okay. Thus, it appears that something can be 'caught' on a layer, in this case the fill color, or rather the fact that I could not get rid of the fill color, no matter what it was. I do have 310 layers in THE doc, most as sub layers under main layers.
Must add that AI's Opacity, Layers, and other features are terrific. I finally have gotten over my reaction in the move from FH to AI, especially since CS3 version sped up the very slow CS2 version. Again, do everything you can to get all of FH features into AI. FH is a tremendous program which relatively few people knew of and exploited. If Adobe wants to create another real success story, follow Ken Nielsen's advice (as you are doing with your question, Wade.)

Features I'd like to see added to iTunes

I'm mostly pleased with iTunes and much prefer it over WMP10. The only niggle I have with it is that it won't let you copy playlists. So if I set up a smart playlist with a host of variables then want to create a copy with only one variable changed I have to go through the whole playlist creation process to make the new playlist. If there was a menu option whereby I could create a copy of a playlist and the new playlist would be called copy of... that would help in this regard.
Something else I'd like to see added is a mood rating - a bit like the 5 star rating you can attach to songs. It would be like the 5 star rating but instead of 5 stars you would rate songs from sad to happy. Then when you felt in a happy mood you could choose a smart playlist with all your happy songs or if you were in a sad mood you could choose a smart playlist with all your sad songs.
Just my twoppence worth...

THANKS FOR YOUR DETAILED RESPONSE --SORRY TO HEAR YOU ARE HAVING
CONVERSION PROBLEMS--HOPE THEY WORK OUT
I'll check out your suggestion re Buelie's discussions.
Regarding the conversion from Apple Lossless to lower bit rates, I understand
that its not time consuming from the discussions quoted below--but I am still
working on it (and still sitting on the fence re what bit rate I should use).
Secondly you mentioned the problem of duplicate songs--again I think it might
be easy to make the Lossless files distinctive. From the discussion below
I think they are already distinguished by "kind" which should make it easy to
add another distinguishing feature in a batch process. Unfortunately I'm not at that stage yet so I can't confirm that.
We are probably getting off the topic in this forum so this will probably be my last post here -- thanks again for all your help.
Below are some of the discussions (provided by King Cole) which you may or may not have read but which may provide useful:
Problem: Before I knew anything about bit rates or file sizes, I accidently imported a ton of my music as giant music files like Apple lossless! Now, my iPod has filled up with far fewer songs than Apple said could fit on my iPod! What do I do?!?
Solutions:
You have a couple options now. What you are going to need to do is convert the songs to a smaller file size like mp3. Under your import preferences (which can be found under iTunes>Preferences>Import Tab if you use an Apple or File>Preferences>Import Tab if you use Windows), change the file type to the type you would like to convert your music too.
Then, in your music library, sort your music by "Kind." If there isn't a "Kind" column at the top of your library, right click or control-click the "sorting bar" and select Kind. Click on "Kind" so that the arrow is either pointing up or down. See what file types your songs are. Are there any that are already in the file format that you are about to convert to? If so, don't select those songs. Otherwise, select the other songs (we'll say for discussion purposes that you chose AAC under the Import tab). Right click or control-click the selected songs and choose "Convert to AAC." iTunes will then copy and paste all the songs you selected into the new file format, AAC. Now, you have two options. If you have plenty of memory on your computer, I would choose Option 2.
Option 1:
You could delete all the music in the large file format from your library and continue syncing the iPod automatically.
Pros: You don't have to change any of the settings you use to sync your iPod. You also save hard drive space.
Cons: You delete the higher quality music. If you ever want to play your iPod through a stereo or high quality speakers, you won't have the high quality music to play. Also, you have to recreate all your iTunes playlists.
Option 2
Make a Smart playlist (File>Make New Smart playlist). Choose "Kind" in the first drop down menu. Choose "Does Not Contain" from the next drop down menu. Then, type in "Apple Lossless or whatever the large song file type was." What this does is essentially create a separate library for you; one that contains no large files. Now, depending on how many playlists you have, you may want to replace the songs in the playlists with AAC files, but if you don't have too many playlists with large files, it should not be a problem. Next, connect your iPod. Go to File>Preferences>iPod Tab Choose automatically update selected playlists only. Then select all the playlists, including the smart playlists, you want to sync onto your iPod. This will sync all the files in your library, excluding those in the large format.
Pros: You get the best of both world. You have all the lossless files on your computer, and all the AAC files on your iPod.
Cons: You take up a lot of file space on your computer when you virtually duplicate your library.
JC
----------------------------------------------

Features I would like to see in z10

1. I would like to access wifi toggle options in within the app. 2. I would like more launchers added: Customizable and acessible in ammy app - accessed by tapping or swiping on the screen. 3. The ability to put 1 active frame on top of another so that I'm able to access that app without swiping up to the homescreen. And I could view the info in the combined active frames by peeking. 4. The ability to swipe the bottom bezel to: (1.) close the open active frames; (2.) Delete active messeages; half swipe closes/detes 1 active frame/message, full swipe deletes all active frame/messages. 5. More options to put on lockscreen: (1.) Sport scores; (2.) Stocks; (3.) Weather; (4.) App world news; (5.) Rss feeds, etc. Thank You.

Feature Requests for BlackBerry10 OS
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Which topics you would like to see featured on Public Sector BPx content?

Dear community,
We would like to hear from you...
- On which topics would you be interested to get/share further information?
- What would be a good Blog to organize?
- Should we open a thread in the forum to discuss about a particular topic?
- Would you like to share some documents within the BPx library?
best regards,
The Public Sector Community

We are currently planning an upgrade to the ERP 2005s release that will include the new Tax and Revenue Management features. We have been using SAP FI-CA and SD for out tax processing for years and really look forward to finally getting a tax processing solution out of the box from SAP.
Thanks

Features I would like to see in the next version o...

Following are some of the drawbacks in the OVi suite when compared to PC suites from other manufacturers.As a Nokia Ovi user I would love to have these features added to Nokia OVi suite as I believe they are very useful,
1.OVi suite doesnt show the mobile network coverage.This could be a useful feature as user can see whether the mobile is having enough range when using OVi to send SMS's.
2.OVi suite doesnt show the available battery level.
3.Ovi suite should also list the call details as well. Now only messages,contatcs,Photos/Videos,music store,maps and software updates are shown.Having the call logs (received/missed/dialled) will be a very useful feature.
4.Ovi suite does not have any option to view the Notes and Calendar entries on the phone.This is also one useful feature i have found in other mobiles and their PC suites.
Hope Nokia will consider adding the above mentioned features in Ovi suite in future.

Hello @sjose2x,
Have you seen this announcement from Nokia Beta Labs?
http://betalabs.nokia.com/apps/nokia-suite-beta
There could be some features you listed above and what is very
exciting you will have an opportunity to give your feedback directly to
the team behind the Nokia Suite.
-vvaino
#SwitchToLumia

Features I would like to see in Capacity IQ

Hi all,
I am currently implementing Capacity IQ in our virtual environment and I encounter some issue's. I know some probably will be solved by VCops however it is yet uncertain whether we will purchase that software.
- I have 4 vCenters, so I need to log into Capacity IQ 4 times. This makes it hard to provide a Capacity Plan for over all my resources.
- I have multiple hardware platforms in the same vCenter. Sometimes my managment would like to know what the remaining capacity is on a specific platform. I cannot select multiple clusters, so I need to provide a forecast myself.
- Capacity IQ does not provide the intelligence for performing a what-if analysis on datacenter level.
- Some of my clusters function as a DR test-cluster. Never running any machines only during the DR-test, which are scheduled frequently. I would like the option to exclude clusters in Capacity IQ's trend analysis. This way the DR-test does not mess up the trend analysis.
- I cannot enter a custom account to schedule reports with(workaround logon to vCenter and schedule)
- I need the reports to be written to a NFS/CIFS share somewhere, so I can serve them from there and anyone can go look for themselves.
Any ideas with regards to these issue's are much appreciated!
Regards,
Ad

have you follwed this link ?
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmfs-best-practices-wp.pdf
please award points if you see fit.Thanks

Features I would like to see in LabView to enhance documentation and transparency

Problem1: How to make the operator aware of what a logical structure is currently doing/waiting for.
Suggested solution: Introduce a "Header" in all the structures, including a structure NAME and a structure INFO and TEXT (all of which may be entered in ASCII, or fed a value from inside).
Nested structures may feed values "outwards", overriding the previous text in this field.
Thus, accessing the header of the structure "NAME" and retrieving its "INFO" you may actually get the "NAME" of the last activated sub-structure, and so forth.
Benefits:
a) In the code, the header will serve to enforce further documenting the purpose of the structure. On the top of a case structure (for example) you will always see it's NAME (i.e. "Machine Supervision") and for each case you feed a separate INFO (i.e. "Overcurrent has Tripped") and a TEXT (i.e. "Check this or that and press GO to continue")
b) As each case is entered (or "continually"?) the header is made globally available to a "Header info vi" or directly to a front panel object. Thus, on the front panel the operator may easily track the actions of the program. (i.e. This program is currently doing "Machine Supervision". It is currently in state "Overcurrent has tripped". The programmer now advices you to "Check this or that and press GO to continue")
Problem2: What really happened when things went wrong? There are many ways to solve this general problem, however...
Suggested solution: I would like a special "Event Printer" front panel object. That is, a fifo register where info may be entered (from the "Header" above perhaps) and where the last few events may readily be displayed for the operator, much like a solid state event printer.
Benefits: Allows the operator a nice means to track the operation of the program. (and the programmer an easy way of accomplishing it). Example printout:
|09.00 > "Initialization" |
|09.03 > "Machine Supervision" |
|11.42 > > "Overcurrent has tripped"|
(I can think of many options here, such as a selectable fifo depth, how much should be visible, scrollable or not, printing up/down or left/right, etc. This way you can make anything from a simple "current action" field, up to a scrollable historical event database from now, back to when the program was started.
If you have a really elegant way of doing the same with current vi's, I would be interrested to learn how.
Best regards / Ake Hansson

All this is functionality you can create coding your own VIs. It's nice that LabVIEW comes with in-built functions fro a lot of basic tasks..it even has a wealth of functions for very specific tasks...but you got to draw the line somewhere (and let third-party developers do the rest...).
Creating a functional global/que e.g. to hold the last status update from different processes and then read that status and display it on an indicator (or on the window status bar (using e.g. G Toolkit)) is straigtforward.
You can create a version of each structure with string constants or controls in the upper corner(s), fed into the functional global/que...save it in a VI that you put in the user.lib directory and then set the Merge VI option in the palette...you now have a
structure template with the header field and status que.
MTO

Features you'd like to see

These aren't meant as suggestions for a specific model, but more improvements for future products.
1. Since most processors now have an integrated GPU, we're losing a lot of back-panel space to HDMI, DVI, VGA, and DisplayPort sockets. FireWire, eSATA, and extra USB sockets are the casualty (admittedly, nobody cares about the first two, but I like having 8 USB sockets!). Why not put the video sockets on a special card that sits along the main PCI-E x16 slot. If you want to use the integrated GPU, you install that in lieu of a video card. Side benefit for systems integrators: No risk that some user will decide to plug his monitors into an inactive motherboard video port.
2. Instead of a backup BIOS system, why can't they find a way to put the BIOS on a MicroSD card? A bad flash can be fixed by taking the card to another PC, rather than having to replace a non-socketed ROM chip. This would be great for boards on a long-lived platform-- if you bought an old board and a new CPU, you could just take out the BIOS card and flash it on another PC, rather than having to do the "can I find/borrow an older CPU to do the flash" dance. In addition, having loads of flash space (even a 128Mb card would be cavernous for this purpose) would allow for cool stuff like "put Memtest86+, or a minimal bootable Linux districution, or other utilities on the card."
3. On a related note-- if that's infeasible, can they put the installed BIOS version on the sticker on the box? That way, you can check, before leaving the store, if the parts are compatible. I know the 990FXA-GD80 "V2" product was the same board with a newer BIOS... but this would eliminate the need to do such an elaborate reworking.

Quote from: Hak Foo on 24-January-15, 10:34:38
These aren't meant as suggestions for a specific model, but more improvements for future products.
1. Since most processors now have an integrated GPU, we're losing a lot of back-panel space to HDMI, DVI, VGA, and DisplayPort sockets. FireWire, eSATA, and extra USB sockets are the casualty (admittedly, nobody cares about the first two, but I like having 8 USB sockets!). Why not put the video sockets on a special card that sits along the main PCI-E x16 slot. If you want to use the integrated GPU, you install that in lieu of a video card. Side benefit for systems integrators: No risk that some user will decide to plug his monitors into an inactive motherboard video port.
Many cpus made by Intel & AMD do not have an IGP. (I actually search for motherboards that do not include an IGP.) The way it works is that you buy an IGP cpu before you buy a discrete 3d card, generally. Most people who buy an IGP do so because they don't want/need a discrete 3d card. Some motherboards, especially those made by Apple these days, feature surface-mount technology, which means the cpus are soldered to the motherboard and cannot be removed/upgraded. As well, when you add a discrete 3d card into a system with an IGP cpu, and you make whatever bios/efi adjustments are called for, the on-board IGP is disabled. A customer who buys a discrete 3d card and installs it is presumed to know where the "video socket" is located--but even if he's not too sharp, connecting up the disabled IGP won't do anything detrimental, and if he gets no video because he's in the wrong socket he'll soon figure it out...
Quote
2. Instead of a backup BIOS system, why can't they find a way to put the BIOS on a MicroSD card? A bad flash can be fixed by taking the card to another PC, rather than having to replace a non-socketed ROM chip. This would be great for boards on a long-lived platform-- if you bought an old board and a new CPU, you could just take out the BIOS card and flash it on another PC, rather than having to do the "can I find/borrow an older CPU to do the flash" dance. In addition, having loads of flash space (even a 128Mb card would be cavernous for this purpose) would allow for cool stuff like "put Memtest86+, or a minimal bootable Linux districution, or other utilities on the card."
Well, a UEFI is in a discrete motherboard chip for security purposes that would be hobbled by having systems load a bios from an SD card. The bios or UEFI, these days, is the strongest link in the chain of security in a PC--for instance, UEFI "secure boot" is absolutely dependent on a set of inviolate UEFI instructions. If a hacker can get into the machine UEFI/bios then he can control the machine, essentially, and remedies run at the OS level won't have an effect. Some OEMs like Dell ship machines with bioses/efi's that include links to certain kinds of diagnostic routines, however, so perhaps a Dell is more inline with your preferences than a discrete retail motherboard. When customers buy components like discrete motherboards it is assumed by the manufacturer that they already know enough in general to have little if any trouble installing the board--otherwise, they'd not be buying a discrete motherboard in the first place. Right? Makes sense to me...
As for knowing which motherboards support which cpus, well, MSI has an online list of motherboards you can consult, which includes a list of the cpus each board & efi/bios version supports. References like these should be consulted prior to purchasing a motherboard. And if you are in a retail store that is selling such motherboards, it never hurts to ask for that information in the store--assuming the store isn't completely clueless, they should be able to answer questions like that.
I certainly don't understand why you'd think that it's easier to have a second, fully operative computer system around than it is to have a separate cpu handy... I would think the opposite, because if you are buying a new cpu and a new motherboard, then the chances are good that your *old cpu* might be compatible with the new motherboard. At any rate, it is these kinds of questions the buyer is assumed to have the answers to by the motherboard manufacturers when he purchases a discrete motherboard--if you don't have the answers to these questions then you really don't even know what you're buying, right? Someone like that is not going to buy a discrete motherboard because chances are he won't have a clue as to how to install/use it--I think that is generally a logical assumption.
For instance--my motherboard is an MSI G46-970a with an AM3+ cpu socket. When I bought this (excellent) board a couple of years ago, it was to replace an older AM3+ motherboard which was running an Athlon II (it could have been a PhenomII, as well) so I knew when I ordered the board that if I needed to update the bios to support an FX-6300--which it turned out I did--I would need to boot initially with the AthlonII, download the latest bios from MSI, and then install the FX-6300. That's what I did and it went like clockwork because I already knew what I might have to do and was prepared when it came time to do it. Customers who buy discrete motherboards are expected to know certain things when they buy the boards else they risk buying/doing everything related to the motherboard erroneously. Sometimes, though, that's not all bad, because that's how people best amass information and knowledge that is worth having. Nothing beats hands-on.
Quote
3. On a related note-- if that's infeasible, can they put the installed BIOS version on the sticker on the box? That way, you can check, before leaving the store, if the parts are compatible. I know the 990FXA-GD80 "V2" product was the same board with a newer BIOS... but this would eliminate the need to do such an elaborate reworking.
Doing Internet research *before* buying a product is always highly advised. It's only an "elaborate reworking" when you do it the first time, because you don't know what to do and you have to learn your way through, step by step. I can guarantee that if you retain your lessons learned that you will not make the same mistake again, but you'll be fully prepared when buying your next motherboard/cpu.
Good luck... Computing is a lot of fun when you know which way is up--and I'll pass along a hint that has helped me enormously through the years...learn how things work as they work and not as you think you'd prefer them to work...! Some folks spend/waste an enormous amount of time/effort in trying to make their hardware and software do what they think it should do instead of simply learning how and why it does what it does. As you grow in experience you'll begin to get a glimmer of how & why things are done as they are done, and you'll come to understand that there are very good reasons most things work as they do.

Some features I would like to see on Digital Editions

Hey All!
I just wanted to pitch in my two cents. I think Digital Editions is quite nice yet I believe there are a couple of things missing. The GUI could get a little "pimping" so it looks a little more like iBook with the shelves and such, just from an aesthetic point of view. Maybe linking it with a simple, good looking, FAST flash app might work. Also, we should be able to modify the books margins. Many of the books from the Gutenberg Project don't come with margins. Also it would be nice to have a full screen view and perhaps a change of the white background to the more matte beige for less eye strain.
I hope I find some people to echo these proposals so that adobe can incorporate them in future updates.
Thanks

Feature Requests for BlackBerry10 OS
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Extra features I would like to see supported

The immediate thought that comes to my mind which appears to
be lacking in Kuler would be support for the Pantone colour
reference system. Not sure whether there would be some kind of
restriction on this ability though.
I also thought that perhaps it would be useful if the base
colour could be selected at random so that you could then go on to
use a colour scheme which you may not have originally thought
of.

Hi,
Thanks for posting and we appreciate your ideas! Just
curious, how are you using kuler? Always interested...
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=72&catid=622&threadid =1220313&enterthread=y
Sami

Fortran features I would like to see

I have a few suggestions for Fortran features. With the upcoming F2008 public comment period, maybe there is still a chance to suggest some features and still get them incorporated before waiting another 5 years.
The new allocate-on-assignment feature could be applied to some built-in procedures. Now that allocatable and pointer attributes are allowed to distinguish specific procedures, it seems that this should be fairly easy to implement. With allocatable string lengths, this would make the use of return strings much easier. For example, the IOMSG= result could be passed an unallocated string, which gets allocated to the exact message size, but only if needed. Another very useful automatic allocation would be for internal WRITE statements. In all cases, automatic allocation should probably only occur if not already allocated, to avoid changing the behavior of existing valid code. This would only extend the unallocated case, which is otherwise an error.
It makes a lot of sense to me to lift the restriction on mixing functions and subroutines with the same generic name. Subroutine calls always have the CALL token, so there is no chance of confusion. Fortran is even capable of distinguishing variable names from identical language tokens, so this restriction seems especially odd to me. Is there any real value to having this restriction?
Another useful feature would be to have host entity access control and renaming with an enhanced IMPORT statement, similar to what is available with USE statements. This is a much bigger feature, but there are some Fortran committee members that already think it is a good idea.

Please file an RFE (Type) through bugs.sun.com.
http://bugs.sun.com/
Rose

Feature I would like to see for Keyframing masks/shapes

When keyframing a mask shape or a shape in general, you have one keyframe switch in the Inspector window. Then you have the points below the keyframe switch. It doesn't tell you straight off that if you move Point 1 between Frame 3, 6, 10, and 20 and then you move Point 2 between Frame 10 and Frame 20, the points on Frame 6 and 3 will no longer stay for Point 2 and readjust to the Frame 10. Which, makes sense as far as keyframing is concerned...but it kind of cancels that sense out when you only have one keyframe button. So I assumed it would put a keyframe on every point that I have said "add keyframe", but thats not the case. SO! Motion Developers. I don't mind the one keyframe set in the inspector, but I think it would be really cool if you could visually show in the Canvas on each point where there is a keyframe, and where there is not. Maybe color differentiation or something. DO IT!

That might be cool, but you won't reach Motion developers here. Just us chickens here -er- users.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/motion.html
is where you wanna post this.
Patrick

What Features Would YOU Like To See Added To Encore?

I'm a relative newbie to DVD authoring, though I've completed hundreds of successful Projects. I also have used few other authoring programs, before Encore. I'd be interested in hearing what others would like to see added to Encore. This is kinda' like your "Feature Request," but it's really only for my interest and edification, as I cannot imagine Adobe reading the Lounge forum.
To date, every thing that I have wanted to do has been accomplished by either reading this forum, a couple of books or asking specific questions, and then using various workarounds. Maybe I have not set my DVD authoring sights high enough. That's why I'm posing my question to you. I also hope to get ideas for neat "things," that I never even have thought about.
Thanks,
Hunt

A real coaching app would be much appreciated. All the one alread offered does the samething... designing drills.
We (the coaches) need more than that, we need something to allow us follow and take note, comment our teams/players/coach.

IWEB Features you would like to see added

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for